scholarly journals A Phase 1 Trial of Regorafenib in Advanced Myeloid Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Chi-Joan How ◽  
Siyang Ren ◽  
Jennifer Lombardi Story ◽  
Meghan Bergeron ◽  
Julia E. Foster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Board Member ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Myeloid Neoplasms ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis is increasingly known to play a role in pathogenesis of hematologic malignancies, including myeloid neoplasms. Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor that targets angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic kinases including VEGF- 1, 2, 3, TIE-2, PDGFR-β,c-KIT, rRET, RAF-1, FGFR-1, BRAF and p38 MAP kinase. As a result of regorafenib's broad inhibition of kinases and its effects on angiogenesis, this drug has the potential to overcome the limitations of more selective kinase inhibitors and may be associated with efficacy in various myeloid neoplasms, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). METHODS: We conducted a single-center, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion phase I trial in patients with relapsed/refractory AML, MPN, or MDS to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of regorafenib and identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). A 3+3 dose escalation design was used with 2 planned dose levels (120 mg or 160 mg daily in 28-day cycles), as well as 1 de-escalation level (80 mg daily). An additional 10 patients were treated on an expansion cohort. RESULTS: Six patients were enrolled during the dose escalation phase (3 at 120 mg daily followed by 3 at 160 mg daily), with no DLTs, as defined by a Grade >3 toxicity occurring within the first 28 days after initiation of treatment, and unrelated to the myeloid neoplasm. Therefore, the RP2D of regorafenib was identified as 160 mg daily. Ten additional patients were enrolled on this dose during the expansion phase. The median age was 74 (range 36-84), and 13 (81%) patients were male. Diagnoses included 7 AML, 6 MDS, and 3 MPN patients (Table 1). Dose modifications and delays occurred in 5 and 4 patients, respectively. The median duration of treatment was 56 days or 2.5 cycles (range: 5-410 days, 1-15 cycles). Of the 16 patients, the best overall disease response as measured by IWG criteria included partial remission (in 1 patient with AML), stable disease in 12 (2 de novo AML, 2 secondary AML, 3 MPN, and 5 MDS) patients, and progressive disease in 3 (1 MDS and 2 secondary AML) patients. An initial improvement in absolute neutrophil count and/or hemoglobin was observed in the 6 MDS patients, although this did not meet criteria for hematologic improvement by IWG criteria. All patients have discontinued off treatment. The most frequent Grade 3-4 adverse effects (AEs) included liver function test abnormalities (5.1%), fatigue (4.3%), thrombocytopenia (3.4%), and neutropenia (3.4%) (Table 2). The majority of AEs were grades 1-2. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib demonstrates an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory myeloid malignancy patients, a population where few treatment options exist. The majority of patients achieved stable disease. Modest improvements in cell counts were observed in MDS patients, and we are performing correlative studies to clarify regorafenib's mechanism of action and identify populations which may benefit from treatment. Disclosures Amrein: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Brunner:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fathi:Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Blueprint: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Narayan:Sanofi-Genzyme: Other: Current Spouse employment ; Takeda: Other: Prior Spouse employment within 24 months; Genentech: Other: Prior Spouse employment within 24 months and prior spouse equity divested within past 24 months. Neuberg:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Celgene: Research Funding. Chen:Takeda: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Equillium: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board Member; AbbVie: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board Member; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Actinium: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board Member; Kiadis: Consultancy. Hobbs:Merck: Research Funding; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Regorafenib was used to assess safety and preliminary efficacy in advanced myeloid malignancies

scholarly journals Patient Reported Financial Toxicity in Acute Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4796-4796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Knight ◽  
Myra Robinson ◽  
Michael R. Grunwald ◽  
Lauren M. Bohannon ◽  
Erin Blackwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Financial Toxicity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring

Abstract Background: Financial Toxicity (FT) is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in a variety of cancers. Treatment of acute leukemia is associated with heavy healthcare utilization and high costs. The purpose of this study was to define rates, risk factors, and mortality implications for FT in patients with acute leukemia using patient reported data. Methods: All patients seen at the Levine Cancer Institute, a tertiary hospital-based leukemia practice, were surveyed prior to each visit over a six-month period. All patients were aged ≥18 years and were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The survey consisted of the PROMIS Global-10 measure and two questions from the COST measure. FT was defined as scoring 4 or less (maximum: 10) in agreement with the COST questions: "I know that I have enough money in savings, retirement, or assets to cover the costs of my treatment" and "I am satisfied with my current financial situation." Demographic data and disease characteristics were abstracted from the medical record. Model selection was carried out using logistic regression to identify factors impacting the incidence of financial toxicity. Correlation of numerical financial toxicity scores with PROMIS scores and with mortality data was assessed using linear regression. Results: Of the 106 patients, 58 (54%) met the definition of exhibiting FT. The factors associated with incidence of FT included: age, race, and insurance type. The odds of FT in those patients <65 years of age were 2.7 times the odds of FT in those ≥65, adjusting for race, insurance, and time since first treatment (95% CI: 0.884 - 8.438, p = .081). The odds of FT in African American patients were 4.3 times the odds of FT in Caucasian patients, adjusting for age, insurance, and time since first treatment (CI: 0.408 - 44.824, p = .150). The odds of FT in patients with Medicaid insurance were 14.2 times the odds of FT in patients with commercial insurance, adjusting for age, race, and time since first treatment (CI: 1.658 - 121.862, p = .106). Gender, distance from the hospital, type of acute leukemia, history of blood/marrow transplant, and history of relapsed disease were not found to be significant. There was a significant correlation for both the PROMIS global physical (p < .001) and mental (p < .001) scores with the FT score. Lower FT score (higher degree of FT) was associated with lower mental and physical scores. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between patients with FT scores >4 compared to patients with FT scores <=4; however, there was a trend toward decreased survival in those with lower FT scores (Figures 1 and 2). Conclusions: Patients with acute leukemia represent an extremely vulnerable population for financial toxicity with rates of distress even higher than other reported malignancies. Urgent interventions are indicated in this population. Disclosures Grunwald: Medtronic: Equity Ownership; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Avalos:Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Symanowski:Five Prime Therapeutics: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board ; Boston Biomedical: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board ; Eli Lily & Co: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Immatics: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board.

scholarly journals Systematic Review of the Published Evidence on the Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2818-2818
Author(s):  
Menchen Xi ◽  
Tamara Navarro-Ruan ◽  
Sunil Mammen ◽  
Victor S. Blanchette ◽  
Cedric R. Hermans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Population Pk ◽  
Viii And Ix ◽  
Factor Concentrate

Abstract Introduction: The efficacy of factor VIII and IX concentrates administered to prevent bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A and B is correlated with the plasma levels measured over time after the infusion. The inter-patient variability of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters is large, and it is difficult to assess individual PK profiles due to the need for multiple time points. This is often not feasible, particularly for pediatric patients. Population PK modeling potentially provides a practical solution to this problem. The successful modelling of PK parameters at the population level requires knowledge of disposal characteristics and relevant covariates. We performed a systematic review of the available evidence in order to identify available PK data for factor VIII and IX concentrates to facilitate the implementation of a population PK approach. Methods: We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1997 to May 2014, using the keywords "hemophilia" and "pharmacokinetic". We included only articles that published original PK data for factor VIII and IX concentrates in humans and published in English. Two authors independently screened the studies and extracted the relevant data. Results: We retrieved 237 unique articles published between 1998 and 2013. We excluded 185 articles that did not meet our research criteria. We included 52 articles, with a total of 1365 patients included in PK analyses. 26 articles reported PK data on factor VIII concentrates, 18 articles report PK data on factor IX concentrates, and one article reported on both factor VIII and IX concentrates. Seven articles reported pharmacokinetic data on both factor VIII and Von Willebrand factor concentrates. We extracted the following data: number of patients, type and severity of hemophilia, patient age, factor concentrate infused, dose infused, sampling data points, half-life, clearance, recovery and the model used for pharmacokinetics, and inclusion of patients undergoing surgery or with inhibitors. The main results are summarized in table 1. Conclusions: This review provides the first systematic appraisal of the methods and results of published papers in the field. The data gathered confirms the intra-patient variability of factor concentrate PK and provides useful information on which to build population based PK models. *3 FIX articles and 2 FVIII articles did not report lab test; one article reported PK data for both FIX and FVIII †11 articles reported FVIII PK data for both one-stage clotting and chromogenic assays ǂPapers reporting on long-acting FVIII and FIX were included in the review, but not summarized in the table. For this reason, not all 1365 patients are accounted for in the table §Estimate of the range of the means found in the papers Disclosures Xi: Baxter: Research Funding. Navarro-Ruan:Baxter: Research Funding. Mammen:Baxter: Research Funding. Collins:Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Neufeld:Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: data safety monitoring board, data safety monitoring board Other; Biogen IDEC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NovoNordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfiser: consultancy, data and safety monitoring board Other; Octapharma: Research Funding. Dunn:CSL Behring,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfiser: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Iorio:Baxter: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biogen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfiser: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Hemophilia Prophylaxis No Longer Just for Children without Inhibitors - Increasing Use of Prophylaxis in Other Groups (children with inhibitors and adults with and without inhibitors)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3535-3535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Carcao ◽  
Maria L. Avila ◽  
Victor S. Blanchette ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Carmen Escuriola-Ettingshausen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring ◽  
Adults And Children

Abstract Background: Long-term prophylaxis is standard of care in children with severe hemophilia A (SHA) and B (SHB) without inhibitors. Studies have shown benefit from long-term prophylaxis in adults with SH and in both adults and children with SH and inhibitors. Yet there is little data on the prevalence of prophylaxis in these groups. Aim/Methods: To understand the current use of long-term prophylaxis in these groups of patients in countries capable of underwriting the high cost of prophylaxis we surveyed (2013) hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs) in countries where long-term prophylaxis in children is routinely used. Results: 134 HTC from 14 countries in North America, Australasia, and Western Europe reported on 4,763 adults with SH (4,011 SHA; 752 SHB) and on 751 children and adults with inhibitors. Prophylaxis use in these groups is shown in table 1: Table 1. Prophylaxis use in adults with SH (without inhibitors). Adults without inhibitors Children and adults with inhibitors HA HB In ITI setting In non-ITI setting % on Prophylaxis 59 49 29 28 Most common regimen EOD 2 d/wk FEIBA EOD or 3 d/wk FEIBA EOD or 3 d/wk EOD, every other day Adults without inhibitors: A higher proportion of SHA (59%) vs SHB adults (49%) were on prophylaxis (Χ2 p<.001). This was particularly true in the age group of 18-30 y [74% (SHA) vs 60% (SHB)]. For SHA the use of prophylaxis was progressively less in older age groups: 31-40 y (55%), 41-50 y (47%), 51-70 y (39%) and >70 y (29%). There was little drop in the proportion of SHB adults on prophylaxis with increasing age. 67% of SHA adults on prophylaxis were receiving ≥3 infusions/wk while 80% of SHB adults on prophylaxis were receiving ≥2 infusions/wk. Once/wk prophylaxis was reported in 3% of SHA and by 19% of SHB patients on prophylaxis. Daily prophylaxis was rarely reported in both groups. Children and adults with inhibitors: Data was available on 407 children and 344 adults with SH and inhibitors. Table 2 shows the proportion of children and adults on/not on Immune tolerance induction (ITI) and on/not on bypassing agent prophylaxis (BA-P). Most children (78%) were on either ITI (with or without BA-P) or on BA-P alone and as such were having some bleed protection. In contrast only 28% of adults were on either ITI (with or without BA-P) or on BA-P and as such most adults with inhibitors are not on any bleed protection. Table 2. Use of ITI and of BA-P in children and adults with SH (+ inhibitors). 403 children 344 adults On ITI. Not on BA-P 43% 8% On ITI. On BA-P 17% 4% Not on ITI. Not on BA-P 23% 71% Not on ITI. On BA-P 18% 16% In total, 185 patients had received FEIBA prophylaxis while 70 had received rFVIIa prophylaxis. FEIBA prophylaxis was particularly more common (vs. rFVIIa prophylaxis) in the non-ITI setting [FEIBA (n=107 pts) vs rFVIIa (n=33 pts)]. The most common prophylactic FEIBA regimen was EOD or 3/wk while the most common rFVIIa prophylaxis regimen was daily. Conclusions: This survey captured data on 4,763 adults with SHA/SHB and on 751 adults and children with SH and inhibitors. This is the largest survey of prophylaxis in these 2 groups of patients. Given the benefits of prophylaxis in children it is reassuring to observe that prophylaxis in adults (without inhibitors) is more prevalent than previously reported. Use of BA-P in patients with inhibitors still however lags far behind the use of prophylaxis in non-inhibitor patients - particularly in adults. FEIBA is more commonly used for prophylaxis than rFVIIa. Our survey did not capture longterm patient outcome data; this needs evaluation. Note: This abstract includes data presented as separate abstracts at the ISTH 2015 meeting. The data has been combined and analyzed in this abstract to show the increasing use of prophylaxis outside of children without inhibitors. Disclosures Blanchette: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board, Research Funding. Santagostino:CSL Behring: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen/Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Baxter/Baxalta: Speakers Bureau; Kedrion: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau. Leissinger:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Aledort:Baxter Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: DSMB Participation; Kedrion BioPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Determining Clinical Course of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Using Targeted Transcriptome and Machine Learning Algorithms

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2395-2395
Author(s):  
Maher Albitar ◽  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Andre H. Goy ◽  
Zijun Xu-Monette ◽  
Govind Bhagat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Short Survival ◽  
Naive Bayesian ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Naïve Bayesian

Abstract Introduction: Multiple studies have demonstrated that diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be divided into subgroups based on their biology. However, these biological subgroups overlap clinically. While R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) remains the standard of care for treating patients with DLBCL, predicting which patients will not benefit from such therapy is important so that alternative therapy or clinical trials can be considered. Most of the studies stratifying patients select biomarkers first, then explore how these biomarkers can stratify patients based on outcome. We explored the potential of using machine learning to first group patients with DLBCL based on survival, then isolating the biomarkers necessary for predicting these survival subgroups. Methods: RNA was extracted from tissue paraffin blocks from 379 R-CHOP treated patients with de novo DLBCL, and from 247 patients with extranodal DLBCL. A targeted hybrid capture RNA panel of 1408 genes was used for next generation sequencing (NGS). Sequencing was performed using an Illumina NextSeq 550 System platform. Ten million reads per sample in a single run were required, and the read length was 2 × 150 bp. An expression profile was generated from the sequencing coverage profile of each individual sample using Cufflinks. A machine learning system was developed to classify patients into four groups based on their overall survival. This machine learning approach based on Naïve Bayesian algorithm was also used to discover the relevant subset of genes with which to classify patients into each of the four survival groups. To eliminate the underflow problem commonly associated with the standard Naïve Bayesian classifiers, we applied Geometric Mean Naïve Bayesian (GMNB) as the classifier to predict the survival group for each patient. Results: Using machine learning, patients were first divided into two groups: short survival (S) and long survival (L). To refine this model, we used the same approach and divided the patients in each group into two subgroups, generating four groups: long survival in the long group (LL), short survival in the long group (LS), long survival in the short group (SL), and short survival in the short group (SS). The hazard ratio for this model was 0.174 (confidence interval: 0.120-0.251), and P-value &lt;0.0001. After defining these four groups, a machine learning algorithm was used to discover the biomarkers from the expression data of the 1408 genes from NGS data. To reduce the effects of noise and avoid overfitting, we employed a 12-step cross validation to obtain a robust measure. For an individual gene, a generalized Naïve Bayesian classifier was constructed on the training of one of the 12 subsets and tested on the other 11 testing subsets. This allowed us to limit the prediction process to 60 genes for each separation step. Using the selected biomarkers, we classified the patients in the original set (379 patients) into LL, LS, SL, and SS groups and then evaluated the survival pattern of these groups. As shown in Fig. 1A, the selected biomarkers predicted survival as expected in the overall survival groups prior to biomarker selection. For additional validation of the system, we used the selected biomarkers to classify a completely new set of 247 samples of patients with extranodal DLBCL. As shown in Fig. 1B, these selected biomarkers successfully predicted the overall survival in this group of patients with an HR of 0.530 (confidence interval: 0.234-1.197, P=0.005). This classification correlated with cell of origin classification, TP53 mutation status, MYC expression, and IRF4 expression. However, in a multivariate analysis, only TP53 mutation was independent in predicting prognosis (P=0.005) and age (below or over 60) (P=0.01) along with the survival grouping (P&lt;0.000001). Conclusions: Using a novel machine learning approach with the expression levels of 180 genes, we developed a model that can reliably stratify patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP into four survival subgroups. This model can be used to identify patients who may not respond well to R-CHOP to be considered for alternative therapy and clinical trials. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hsi: AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Ferreri: Ospedale San Raffaele srl: Patents & Royalties; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Hutchison Medipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; PletixaPharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; x Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adienne: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Piris: Millenium/Takeda, EUSA, Jansen, NanoString, Kyowa Kirin, Gilead and Celgene.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Winter: BMS: Other: Husband: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Actinium Pharma: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Husband: Consultancy; Agios: Other: Husband: Consultancy; Gilead: Other: Husband: Consultancy; Epizyme: Other: Husband: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Ariad/Takeda: Other: Husband: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Husband: Consultancy, Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Karyopharm (Curio Science): Honoraria.

Phase 1/2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 432-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Jonathan Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 432 Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody directed against CS1, a cell surface glycoprotein, which is highly and uniformly expressed in multiple myeloma (MM). Elotuzumab induces significant antibody-dependant cytotoxicity (ADCC) against primary myeloma cells in the presence of either autologous or allogeneic peripheral lymphocytes (PBMC), which is significantly enhanced when PBMC effector cells were pretreated with lenalidomide (Tai et al., Blood 112:1329, 2008). The primary objective of the phase 1 portion of the study is to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM. The study is also evaluating safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical response. Lenalidomide (25 mg PO) is given on Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Elotuzumab in three escalating dose cohorts (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg) is administered by IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of the 28-day cycle in the first two cycles and then on Days 1 and 15 of each subsequent cycle. Dexamethasone is given weekly at 40 mg PO. Initially, patients received 6 cycles of treatment unless withdrawn earlier due to disease progression or unacceptable. toxicity. The protocol was amended to allow for patients in the 10 and 20 mg/kg cohorts to receive treatment for up to 12 months following enrollment of the last patient. Key entry criteria: age ≥ 18 years; MM with at least one relapse; measurable disease M-protein component in serum and/or in urine; and prior lenalidomide treatment, if any, more than 6 weeks of first dose. To date, 24 patients with a median age of 60 years have been enrolled in the study and 23 patients have received study drug. The median time from initial diagnosis of MM was 5 years and patients had received a median of 3 prior MM treatments. Patients had been previously treated with thalidomide (58%), bortezomib (67%) or lenalidomide (21%) and 42% were refractory to their most recent MM therapy. Patients have been treated in the 3 cohorts; 3 patients each in the first two cohorts (5 and 10 mg/kg elotuzumab) and 17 patients (7 in dose-escalation phase and 10 in the expansion phase) in the third cohort (20 mg/kg). No dose limiting toxicities were identified during the dose-escalation phase of the study and no MTD was established. One patient discontinued in the first cycle due to grade 4 allergic reaction resulting from elotuzumab infusion in the expansion phase of the study. Additional SAEs (1 of each) included grade 2 atrial fibrillation (related to lenalidomide/dexamethasone) and unrelated grade 4 ruptured diverticulum, grade 3 neutropenic fever and grade 3 diarrhea.. Other common grade 3 or 4 AEs included neutropenia (25%) and thrombocytopenia (25%), which were managed by dose withholding or dose reduction of lenalidomide. Approximately 25% of patients experienced grade 1 or 2 chills and/or pyrexia associated with elotuzumab infusion. The best clinical response (IMWG criteria) in the 13 patients who have received at least two cycles of treatment is shown in the table below. Preliminary PK analysis of elotuzumab suggests a serum half-life of 10-11 days at 10 and 20 mg/kg. Elotuzumab at all three doses resulted in near complete saturation of CS1 sites on plasma cells and NK cells in bone marrow and NK cells in the peripheral compartment. In conclusion, the combination of elotuzumab with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone has a manageable adverse event profile and compared to historical data for lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone, the preliminary efficacy data (≥ PR of 92%) are very encouraging. Additional safety, efficacy and PK/PD data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Lonial: Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide/dexamethasone in combination with elotuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Vij:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Harousseau:Celgene France: Advisory Board; Janssen Cilag France: Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding. Mazumder:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Leleu:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Fry:Facet Biotech: Employment. Singhal:Facet Biotech: Employment. Jagannath:Millennium: Advisory Board; Merck: Advisory Board.

A Phase 1b, Dose-Finding Study Of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat In Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF): Identification Of The Recommended Phase 2 Dose

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4045-4045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincen t Ribrag ◽  
Claire N Harrison ◽  
Florian H Heidel ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Suddhasatta Acharyya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with progressive, debilitating symptoms that impact patient quality of life (QoL) and reduce survival. Ruxolitinib (RUX), a potent dual JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated superiority in spleen volume and symptom reduction, improved health-related QoL measures, and prolonged survival compared with traditional therapies or placebo in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. Panobinostat (PAN) is a potent oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (DACi) that inhibits JAK pathway signaling through increased acetylation of the JAK2 protein chaperone HSP90. In phase 1/2 studies in MF, PAN has shown reduction in splenomegaly and JAK2 V617F allele burden, and improvement of marrow fibrosis. RUX and PAN demonstrated synergistic anti-MF activity in JAK2-mutation–driven MF murine models. Here, we present the results of a phase 1b study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of RUX and PAN in MF patients. Methods Patients with intermediate-1, -2, or high-risk MF by International Prognostic Scoring System criteria and with palpable splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm below the costal margin were enrolled. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first cycle along with other safety findings. DLTs were defined as protocol-specified toxicities related to treatment but unrelated to disease progression, intercurrent illness, or concomitant medications, occurring up to and including cycle 1 day 28, that are considered severe enough to prevent continuation of treatment. Each dosing cohort consisted of ≥ 3 evaluable patients. Data for ≥ 9 patients were required to determine the preliminary RP2D and/or maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Following determination of the preliminary RP2D, additional patients were to be enrolled and treated at that dose in the safety-expansion phase. The range of dose levels tested for RUX was 5-15 mg twice daily (BID) and for PAN was 10-25 mg once daily, 3 times a week (TIW; days 2, 4, and 6), every other week (QOW) in a 28-day cycle. Serial blood samples collected following the first dose of RUX alone on day 1 and in combination with PAN on days 2 and 6 were evaluated for plasma concentrations of RUX (days 1, 2, and 6) and PAN (days 2 and 6) by LC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using noncompartmental analysis. Spleen size was determined by palpation. Results A total of 38 patients have been enrolled across 6 cohorts in the dose-escalation phase. Preliminary data presented here are based on a cutoff date of March 7, 2013. Thirteen patients (34.2%) have discontinued study treatment. Reasons for discontinuation include disease progression (n = 4), adverse events (n = 7), withdrawal of consent (n = 1), and death due to pulmonary embolism (n = 1). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were anemia (34.2%), thrombocytopenia (21.2%), abdominal pain (7.9%), and diarrhea (7.9%). QTc prolongation of > 500 ms was observed in 1 patient in cohort 4. DLTs are summarized in the Table. An approximate 50% increase in plasma exposure of both RUX and PAN on day 6 from respective baselines suggested drug-drug interaction (DDI) at 15 mg RUX and 25 mg PAN. The RP2D was defined at the cohort 6 dose and schedule. Evidence of preliminary activity was observed across all cohorts with 28 patients (73.7%) showing ≥ 50% decrease in palpable spleen length at some point during the study. Conclusions The combination of RUX and PAN has a tolerable safety profile, with few DLTs and acceptable rates of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia. Also, encouraging splenomegaly reduction was seen in the dose-escalation phase. The MTD was not reached; however, due primarily to findings of anemia and potential DDI in dose cohort 6, preliminary RP2D was identified at RUX 15 mg BID/PAN 25 mg TIW/QOW and will be confirmed in the dose-expansion phase. Additional safety and efficacy data from patients in the expansion phase will be presented. Disclosures: Ribrag: Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson : Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ruxolitinib is approved for MF but panobinostat is not approved anywhere globally at this time for any indication. Harrison:S Bio: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Heidel:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Acharyya:Novartis: Employment. Mu:Novartis: Employment. Liu:Novartis: Employment. Williams:Novartis: Employment. Giles:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Conneally:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kindler:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Passamonti:sanofi-aventis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Vannucchi:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Characterizing the Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Children Using the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Dataset (ATHNdataset)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1156-1156
Author(s):  
Jennifer G. Davila ◽  
Dunlei Cheng ◽  
Leslie J. Raffini ◽  
Courtney D. Thornburg ◽  
Fernando F. Corrales-Medina
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring

Background: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children has risen significantly. (Raffini, Huang et al. 2009) There are currently four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) - apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban - approved for the acute treatment and prevention of VTE in adults. Advantages of these medications over the traditionally used anticoagulants, enoxaparin and warfarin, include fixed dosing, no need for routine laboratory monitoring, few drug interactions and no dietary restrictions. Despite lack of information on the safety and efficacy of these agents in children, pediatric hematologists across the United States are using DOACs in their patients based on extrapolated data from adult studies. The American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) is a nonprofit network of over 140 federally funded Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs) which provides the infrastructure for clinical and surveillance-based research. ATHN maintains the ATHNdataset (ADS), a "limited dataset" free of protected health information, with data collected on patients with bleeding and clotting disorders at participating HTCs within the Human Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-supported regional hemophilia networks across the US. The authors acknowledge ATHN, the ATHN-affiliated U. S. Hemophilia Treatment Centers and their 39,000+ patients who have contributed their demographic, clinical, and genetic information to the ATHNdataset. Methods: The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of pediatric patients diagnosed with VTE in the ADS, focusing on those patients who received a DOAC. Data were abstracted for patients in the ADS who had acute VTE at age <21 years from January 2010 to March 2019. Data extraction included basic demographics and information about VTE and treatment. Results : A total of 1,094 pediatric VTE cases were captured in the ADS. 577 (52.7%) were male. Caucasians were the most prevalent racial group (n = 809; 74%), followed by African-Americans (n = 203; 18.6%).14.9% (n = 163) were Hispanic. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was the most prevalent pediatric VTE reported in the ADS (n=889, 81.3%), followed by pulmonary embolism and cerebral venous thrombosis (n=130, 11.9% and n=40, 3.7% respectively). VTE location by age group is listed in Table 1. The most common DVT location was the lower extremities or pelvis, comprising 37.5% (n = 333) of all reported DVTs. Upper extremities or upper thorax DVT occurred less often (n = 211; 23.8 %). 345 (38.8 %) cases were reported only as "DVT" without a specific thrombus location. We reviewed 1,051 anticoagulant prescriptions for 650 VTE patients (mean 1.6 prescriptions per person). Enoxaparin was the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant (n = 676 prescriptions; 64.3%) followed by warfarin (n = 178 prescriptions, 16.9%). Interestingly, 116 (11%) patients, from 21 HTCs, had a DOAC prescribed as their anticoagulant regimen. Anticoagulant prescription by anticoagulant starting age is shown in Table 2. Further analysis of the DOAC subgroup showed that rivaroxaban was the most prescribed DOAC with 77.6% (n = 90/116) of the patients using this agent. Apixaban and dabigatran use was also reported (n= 23, 19.8% and n= 3, 2.6% respectively). The majority of DOACs were prescribed for patients older than 13 years of (111/116, 95.7 %). In children between 3 to 6 years of age (n = 3), rivaroxaban was the only DOAC prescribed. DOACs were primarily used to treat DVT of the extremities (84/116 patients). Other scenarios in which DOACs were also prescribed were PE and abdominal venous thrombosis patients (26, and 4 patients, respectively). Anticoagulant prescription by anticoagulant starting age is shown in Table 2. Conclusion: DVT of the lower extremities and pelvis is the most prevalent pediatric VTE in the ADS. Enoxaparin and warfarin remain the main anticoagulant agents used for pediatric VTE treatment. Despite lack of an FDA-approved pediatric indication, hematologists in US-based HTCs are already using DOACs in pediatric patients with VTE. As further characterization of DOAC use in children is needed, the authors, in collaboration with ATHN, are currently building a multi-institutional retrospective and prospective registry, ATHN 15. This registry will serve as a resource for pediatric hematologists to collect real-world use of DOACs in children, as we await the results of prospective clinical trials. Disclosures Davila: Octapharma: Other: Grant to attend VWD meeting ; Genentech: Other: Advisory board; Spire Learning: Speakers Bureau. Raffini:Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board; Roche: Other: Advisory Board. Thornburg:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding; Bluebird bio: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Research Funding; Ironwood: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Sanofi Genzyme: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Corrales-Medina:Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasm Has a Distinct Pro-Inflammatory Bone Marrow Microenvironment and Delayed DNA Damage Repair

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
Monika M Kutyna ◽  
Li Yan A Wee ◽  
Sharon Paton ◽  
Dimitrios Cakouros ◽  
Agnieszka Arthur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cytotoxic Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Myeloid Neoplasm ◽  
Myeloid Neoplasms ◽  
Damage Repair

Introduction: Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) are associated with extremely poor clinical outcomes in otherwise long-term cancer survivors. t-MN accounts for ~20% of cases of myeloid neoplasms and is expected to rise due to the increased use of chemotherapy/radiotherapy (CT/RT) and improved cancer survivorship. Historically, t-MN was considered a direct consequence of DNA damage induced in normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) by DNA damaging cytotoxics. However, these studies have largely ignored the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment and the effects of age and concurrent/previous cancers. Aim: We performed an exhaustive functional study of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) obtained from a comparatively large cohort of t-MN patients and carefully selected control populations to evaluate the long-term damage induced by cytotoxic therapy to BM microenvironment and its impact on malignant and normal haematopoiesis. Methods: Four different cohorts were used: (1) t-MN, in which myeloid malignancy occurred after CT/RT for a previous cancer (n=18); (2) patients with multiple cancer and in which a myeloid neoplasm developed following an independent cancer which was not treated with CT/RT (MC-MN; n=10); (3) primary MN (p-MN; n=7) untreated and without any prior cancer or CT/RT; (4) age-matched controls (HC; n=17). Morphology, proliferation, cellular senescence, differentiation potential and γH2AX DNA damage response was performed. Stem/progenitor supportive capacity was assessed by co-culturing haematopoietic stem cells on MSC feeder-layer in long-term culture initiating assay (LTC-IC). Cytokine measurements were performed using 38-plex magnetic bead panel (Millipore) and RNA sequencing libraries were prepared with Illumina TruSeq Total RNA protocol for 150bp paired-end sequencing on a NextSeq500 instrument. Functional enrichment analysis was performed using EnrichR software. Results: MSC cultured from t-MN patients were significantly different from HC, p-MN and MC-MN MSC according to multiple parameters. They exhibited aberrant morphology consisting of large, rounded and less adhesive cells compared to typical spindle-shaped morphology observed with controls. MSC from myeloid neoplasm also showed impaired proliferation, senescence, osteo- and adipogenic differentiation with t-MN MSC showing the greatest differences. DNA repair was dramatically impaired compared to p-MN and HC (Fig.1A). Importantly, these aberrant t-MN MSC were not able to support normal or autologous in vitro long-term haematopoiesis (Fig.1B). The biological characteristic and poor haematopoietic supportive capacity of MSC could be "cell-intrinsic" or driven by an altered paracrine inflammatory microenvironment. Interestingly, several inflammatory cytokines were higher in t-MN compared with marrow interstitial fluid obtained from p-MN patients (Fig.1Ci) and many of these including Fractalkine, IFNα2, IL-7 and G-CSF were also significantly higher in t-MN MSC conditional media (Fig.1Cii). Together, this data suggest that t-MN microenvironment is distinct from p-MN with paracrine production of pro-inflammatory milieu that may contribute to poor HSC supportive capacity. Preliminary whole transcriptome analysis revealed differential gene expression between t-MN and HC (Fig.1Di) and p-MN MSC. Importantly, the deregulated genes play critical role in cell cycle, DNA damage repair, and cellular senescence pathways explaining phenotypical characteristic of t-MN MSC (Fig.1Dii). Moreover CXCL12 expression, a key regulator of haematopoiesis, was significantly lower in t-MN compared to HC (p=0.002) and p-MN MSC (p=0.009), thus explaining poor HSC supportive capacity. The key difference between the p-MN, MC-MN and t-MN is prior exposure to CT/RT. To study this we obtained MSC from two t-MN patients for whom we had samples at the time of their primary cancer, post high-dose chemotherapy and at the time of t-MN. MSC displayed aberrant proliferation and differentiation capacity after high-dose cytotoxic therapy (2 to 4 years prior to developing t-MN) and remained aberrant at t-MN diagnosis (Fig.1E). Conclusions: BM-MSC from t-MN patients are significantly abnormal compared with age-matched controls and typical myeloid neoplasm. Importantly, prior CT/RT leads to long-term irreversible damage to the BM microenvironment which potentially contributes to t-MN pathogenesis. Disclosures Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hiwase:Novartis Australia: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Antibody Response to Vaccination with BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChADOx1 in Patients with Myeloid and Lymphoid Neoplasms

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 218-218
Author(s):  
Jil Rotterdam ◽  
Margot Thiaucourt ◽  
Juliana Schwaab ◽  
Andreas Reiter ◽  
Sebastian Kreil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Hematological Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematological Diseases ◽  
Myeloid Neoplasms ◽  
Lymphoid Neoplasms ◽  
Treatment Naïve

Abstract Background: In general, patients with hematological diseases are predisposed to develop infections. Severe COVID-19 infection associated with high mortality is more likely in these patient cohorts compared to the general population. Due to immune defects related to the primary disease and/or to immunosuppressive treatment regimes, vaccination efficacy may be reduced in patients with hematological diseases. So far, data on this area are limited. Aim: To evaluate vaccination-related antibody response to BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChADOx1 in patients with hematological disorders. Patients and methods: In this interim analysis of a prospective, observational single-center study, we report antibody levels at least 2 weeks after COVID-19 vaccination. A FDA/CE approved electrochemiluminescent assay (ECLIA) (Elecsys®, Roche, Mannheim, Germany) was used to quantify antibodies, pan Ig (including IgG) against the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The assay has a measurement range of 0.4 to 250 U/mL, with a concentration ≥0.8 U/ml considered as positive. Data were analyzed for patients without detection of anti-N (nucleocapsid) SARS-CoV-2 antibody (i.e., without having passed SARS-CoV-2 infection). All tests were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions in an accredited laboratory at the University Hospital Mannheim. Results: Between February 2021 and July 2021, a total of 175 patients with hematological diseases were included in this study. The median age was 66 years (range 21-90 years), and 81 (46.3%) were female. The antibody levels were measured at least 14 days (median, 58 days) after the 2 nd vaccination. The patients were vaccinated with BNT162b2 (BioNTech, n=134), mRNA-1273 (Moderna, n=19), ChADOx1 (AstraZeneca, n=12), or got the first vaccination with BNT162b2 and the second with ChADOx1 (n=10). Overall, 145/175 (82.9%) were diagnosed with a malignant hematological disease (myeloid neoplasms, n=108; lymphoid neoplasms, n=37) and 30/175 with a non-malignant hematological disease (autoimmune disease, n=24; benign, n=6). 124 patients (70.1%) were on active therapy, and 51 patients (29.1%) were previously treated or treatment naïve. Correlation to specific therapies is ongoing and will be presented. In general, vaccination-related antibody response was positive (≥0.8 U/mL) in 148/175 (84.6%) patients with a median level of 208.6 U/mL (range 0.8-250.00) and negative (&lt;0.8 U/mL) in 27/175 (15.4%) patients. The distribution of the negative cohort regarding the disease subgroups were as followed: myeloid neoplasms 7/27 (25.9%), lymphoid neoplasms 16/27 (59.3%), non-malignant hematological disease 4/27 (14.8%). Within the negative cohort, 21/27 (77.8%) were treated on active therapy, 6/27 (22.2%) were previously treated or treatment naïve. In myeloid neoplasms, patients with classical myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) had the highest negative result for antibodies with 4/7 (57.1%) followed by myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) 2/7 (28.6%). Interestingly, all patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) had a measurable immune response. In lymphoid neoplasms, patients with low-grade non-hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (predominately chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CLL) had the highest negative antibody result 13/16 (81.3%) followed by high-grade NHL 4/8 (50%; predominately diffuse large b-cell lymphoma, DLBCL). In non-malignant hematological diseases, only patients with autoimmune diseases had a negative result. Conclusion: A remarkable group of patients with hematological disease were measured with no or low immune response after 2 nd COVID-vaccination, especially those with low-grade NHL, MDS and autoimmune disease. It seems that the percentage of patients with MPN and low response is less critical. No problems appeared in CML patients. Further explorations are needed with focus on potential risk of COVID infections despite full vaccination: The potential of 3 rd booster vaccination should be explored within clinical trials. Disclosures Reiter: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Deciphera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses. Kreil: Novartis: Research Funding. Hofmann: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Jawhar: Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria; Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Other: Travel support; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau. Saussele: Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Ixazomib with Conventional Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
Eyal C. Attar ◽  
Geoffrey Fell ◽  
Traci M. Blonquist ◽  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among older patients has remained largely unchanged for decades. Long-term survival for patients aged &gt;60 years is poor (median survival 10.5 months). Targeting the proteasome in AML is attractive, since leukemia stem cells have demonstrated sensitivity to proteasome inhibition in preclinical models, perhaps through down regulation of nuclear NF-KB (Guzman, Blood 2001). AML cell lines are susceptible to synergistic cytotoxicity when bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is combined with daunorubicin and cytarabine. We have shown that adding bortezomib to standard treatment in AML results in a high remission rate, although grade 2 sensory neurotoxicity was noted in approximately 12% of treated patients. A newer generation proteasome inhibitor, ixazomib, is less frequently associated with neurotoxicity, and, therefore, was selected for combination with conventional chemotherapy in this phase I trial. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib in combination with conventional induction and consolidation chemotherapy for AML. Herein are the initial results of this trial. Methods: Adults &gt;60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML were screened for eligibility. Patients with secondary AML were eligible, including those with prior hypomethylating agent therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We excluded those with promyelocytic leukemia. There were 2 phases in this study. In the first phase (A), the induction treatment consisted of the following: cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day by continuous IV infusion, Days 1-7; daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day IV, Days 1, 2, 3, and ixazomib was provided orally at the cohort dose, Days 2, 5, 9, and 12. Consolidaton or transplant was at the discretion of the treating physician in phase A. In the second phase (B), induction was the same as that with the determined MTD of ixazomib. All patients were to be treated with the following consolidation: cytarabine at 2 g/m2/day, days 1-5 with ixazomib on days 2, 5, 9, and 12 at the cohort dose for consolidation. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine whether the dose of ixazomib could be safely escalated in 3 cohorts (1.5 mg/day, 2.3 mg/day, 3.0 mg/day), initially in induction (phase A) and subsequently in consolidation (phase B). The determined MTD of ixazomib in the first portion (A) of the trial was used during induction in the second portion (B), which sought to determine the MTD for ixazomib during consolidation. Secondary objectives included rate of complete remission, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-six patients have been enrolled on study, and 28 have completed dose levels A-1 through A-3 and B1 through B-2. Full information on cohort B-3 has not yet been obtained, hence, this report covers the experience with the initial 28 patients, cohorts A-1 through B-2. There were 12 (43%) patients among the 28 with secondary AML, either with prior hematologic malignancy or therapy-related AML. Nineteen patients (68%) were male, and the median age was 68 years (range 61-80 years). There have been no grade 5 toxicities due to study drug. Three patients died early due to leukemia, 2 of which were replaced for assessment of the MTD. Nearly all the grade 3 and 4 toxicities were hematologic (Table). There was 1 DLT (grade 4 platelet count decrease extending beyond Day 42). There has been no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity with ixazomib to date. Among the 28 patients in the first 5 cohorts, 22 achieved complete remissions (CR) and 2 achieved CRi, for a composite remission rate (CCR) of 86%. Among the 12 patients with secondary AML 8 achieved CR and 2 achieved CRi, for a CCR of 83%. The median OS for the 28 patients has not been reached (graph). The 18-month OS estimate was 65% [90% CI, 50-85%]. Conclusions: The highest dose level (3 mg) of ixazomib planned for induction in this trial has been reached safely. For consolidation there have been no serious safety issues in the first 2 cohorts with a dose up to 2.3 mg, apart from 1 DLT in the form of delayed platelet count recovery. The recommended phase 2 dose of ixazomib for induction is 3 mg. Accrual to cohort B-3 is ongoing. Notably, to date, no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity has been encountered. The remission rate in this older adult population with the addition of ixazomib to standard chemotherapy appears favorable. Figure Disclosures Amrein: Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Attar:Aprea Therapeutics: Current Employment. Brunner:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Fathi:Blueprint: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. We are using it in this trial for acute myeloid leukemia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document