COVID-19 Outcomes Among Participants in the NHLBI Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Natural History Study

Abstract Introduction: The NHLBI MDS Natural History Study (NCT02775383) is an ongoing prospective cohort study conducted across 144 sites in the U.S. and Israel intended to establish a data and biospecimen repository to advance the understanding of MDS. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study also collected data on COVID-19 infection and management. Here, we report a summary of COVID-19 outcomes from participants in this study and the impact of the pandemic on study operations. Methods: This prospective cohort study initiated in June, 2016 is enrolling patients (pts) undergoing diagnostic work up for suspected or newly diagnosed MDS or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in the setting of cytopenia. Study enrollment was paused from Mar. 27, 2020 to May 18, 2020 due to COVID-19. Previously untreated pts underwent a bone marrow assessment with a centralized histopathology review at enrollment for assignment to a longitudinal cohort (MDS, MDS/MPN overlap, idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with <30% blasts, or "At-Risk" (pts with sub-threshold dysplasia, select karyotype, or select genetic mutations) for follow-up every six months; or a cross-sectional cohort (other cytopenia or cancers) with no further follow-up. COVID-19 outcomes, including tests, status, hospitalizations and treatments for COVID-19, were collected for all eligible pts. Protocol deviations related to COVID-19 were also collected. Fisher's exact test was used for comparing the proportions of pts tested or positive between groups. Results : Of 758 eligible pts with available COVID-19 data, 507 (67%) were assigned to the longitudinal cohort and 251 (33%) to the cross-sectional cohort or are pending assignment. Among longitudinal pts, 74 (15%) had ICUS, 240 (47%) MDS, 47 (9%) MDS/MPN overlap, 11 (2%) AML with <30% blasts, and 135 (27%) At-Risk for MDS. The median age over all pts was 72 years (range=21-95) and 66% were male, 92% White, 4% Black, 2% Asian, and 2% other. Among 244 pts (32%) tested for COVID-19 (Table 1), 23 (9%) were positive. Twelve (>50% of the positive pts) were in Wisconsin, California (CA), and Missouri (Figure 1), with 8 identified from Sep. to Dec. 2020, which overlaps with third waves of COVID-19 reported in CA and in the Midwest. Tests from 17 (74%) of the 23 pts were based on a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. The proportion of pts positive were similar between pooled disease (ICUS, MDS, MDS/MPN, AML <30%), At-Risk, and cross-sectional groups (8%, 8%, 16%, respectively; Table 2) but the proportions tested differed significantly (39%, 28%, and 25%, respectively, p=0.004). Among all positive pts, 21 (91%) are recovering or have recovered (16 with sequelae), 1 (4%) died, and 1 outcome is unknown (Table 1). The one participant who died had MDS with excess blasts-1 (MDS-EB1, 5-9% blasts). Eight pts (35% of positive pts) required hospitalization (median duration of 7 days (range=2-17)) or treatment (tx) in response to COVID-19, 7 of whom required both. In the 8 pts who required tx for COVID-19, 4 reported Remdesivir-use, 3 of whom were diagnosed with MDS or MDS/MPN overlap. The study monthly accrual rates were similar when compared pre- vs. post-study pause (23 vs. 22 pts, respectively) but the rate of missed follow-up visits increased from 5% to 11% post-pause. About half (49%) of the 144 COVID-19-related study deviations occurred during the months the study was paused. Conclusions: In this analysis of 758 pts with MDS and related conditions, the largest reported for these diagnoses, the COVID-19 mortality rate (13%) in MDS was lower than has been reported in a smaller (n=61) case study (39%, Feld et al Blood 2020) but is similar to the rates for MDS observed annually each year prior to study pause (range=11-19%) and to the rate reported in a larger (n=2186) observational study of cancer patients (16%, Rivera et al Cancer Discov 2020). Infection rates were similar across disease groups. The pandemic also resulted in substantial study-specific challenges, including increased rate of deviations, the study being paused, and difficulty sourcing material for biospecimen processing. Data on vaccine efficacy and rates of pts with long-haul symptoms post-COVID may be of interest in future work. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Padron: BMS: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Taiho: Honoraria; Stemline: Honoraria; Blueprint: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding. Komrokji: Novartis: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Acceleron: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Saber: Govt. COI: Other. Al Baghdadi: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Epizyme: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Heron Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cardinal Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. DeZern: Taiho: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sekeres: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda/Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Frailty Among Participants in the NHLBI MDS Natural History Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136992 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 15-16

Author(s):

Gregory A. Abel ◽

Donnie Hebert ◽

Cecilia Lee ◽

James M. Foran ◽

Steven D. Gore ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Physical Activity ◽

At Risk ◽

Natural History ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Natural History Study ◽

Diagnostic Categories ◽

Patient Reported

Introduction: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as quality of life (QOL) are variably affected in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but the heterogeneous composition of disease states grouped together as "MDS" increases the difficulty of assessing and understanding these outcomes. Moreover, little is known about the potential relationship between QOL and frailty in this population. Methods: The NHLBI MDS Natural History Study (NCT02775383) is a prospective cohort enrolling patients undergoing diagnostic work up for suspected MDS or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in the setting of cytopenias. Untreated participants undergo bone marrow assessment with centralized histopathology review at enrollment for assignment into subcategories for longitudinal follow-up: MDS, MDS/MPN, ICUS, AML (<30% blasts), and "At-Risk" (cases with sub-threshold dysplasia or select karyotypic or genetic mutations). PRO and frailty data are collected at enrollment and every six months thereafter. PRO instruments include MDS-specific (QUALMS) and general (FACT-G, PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a, EQ-5D-5L) instruments, and a measure of frailty (VES-13). While no frailty instrument alone has been shown to be a substitute for comprehensive geriatric assessment, VES-13 has been successfully used in cancer-related studies for basic screening, where a score of 3 or more is considered frail (vulnerable). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the overall comparisons of mean baseline scores between diagnostic categories. Pairwise comparisons of scores between diagnostic categories and vulnerability subgroups were performed via two-sample t-tests. Results : Of 835 participants assessed for eligibility, 369 (44%) were classified as MDS, MDS/MPN, AML, ICUS or At-Risk, and further evaluated. Mean age was 72 years (standard deviation (SD)=10.7) and 68% were male. Mean baseline scores on the PRO measures are compared between diagnostic categories in the Table; scores did not differ significantly across categories. In particular, no significant differences were found between MDS and the other diagnostic categories. ICUS had similar QOL scores to MDS and MDS/MPN (e.g., means (SD) on EQ-5D-5L of 74.1 (17.8) in ICUS and 70.8 (19.4) in MDS, p=0.348) but had significantly higher scores than those for AML on EQ-5D-5L (60.7 (28.4), p=0.031). For the 216 participants with diagnostically-confirmed MDS, QOL impairment was similar to that routinely seen in other cancers; for example, the mean total FACT-G was 81.8 (SD=15.9), similar to localized breast cancer (82.4, SD=16.2), localized colorectal cancer (79.6, SD=16.1), and lung cancer with no current evidence of disease (82.6, SD=15.5; comparison means from Pearlman, Cancer, 2014). For frail/vulnerable participants with MDS or MDS/MPN (N=87), the most common reasons for vulnerability were age ≥75 years (68%), overall rating of health as poor or fair (62%), and difficulty with prolonged physical activity (90%) such as walking a quarter mile (75%) or doing heavy housework (70%). A minority also were vulnerable due to requiring help with instrumental activities of daily living (iADLS) such as shopping (28%) or managing money (16%). Mean QOL scores were compared between vulnerability subgroups (Figure). Vulnerable participants pooled over all diagnostic categories had significantly worse PROs than non-vulnerable participants for all measures (p<0.001). In particular, vulnerable MDS participants scored significantly worse on the QUALMS (mean 64.4, SD=13.4) vs. non-vulnerable MDS participants (mean 72.7, SD=13.3), p<0.001. Conclusions: Participants in our cohort with histologically-confirmed MDS-even low-grade MDS-had similar impairments in PROs as those with other cancers. Among those with histologically-confirmed MDS, vulnerable participants had significantly worse QOL on many measures compared to non-vulnerable participants, suggesting that this domain of function be specifically assessed in clinic. Moreover, while a "gestalt" of frailty may be inferred by observing how patients present and move in the office, these data suggest that other contributing domains, such as difficulty with prolonged physical activity and iADLs, should be evaluated explicitly. Disclosures Foran: H3Biosciences: Research Funding; Aptose: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xencor: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Trillium: Research Funding; Revolution Medicine: Consultancy; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding. Gore:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Padron:Incyte: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding. Sekeres:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda/Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Multiple Low Level Mutations Identifies Imatinib Resistant CML Patients At Risk of Poor Response to Second-Line Inhibitor Therapy, Irrespective of the Resistance Profile of the Mutations

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.111.111 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 111-111

Author(s):

Wendy T Parker ◽

Musei Ho ◽

Hamish S Scott ◽

Timothy P. Hughes ◽

Susan Branford

Keyword(s):

At Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Mutation Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Poor Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Low Level ◽

Mass Spec ◽

Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Abstract 111 Specific imatinib resistant BCR-ABL1 mutations confer clinical resistance to nilotinib (NIL; Y253H, E255K/V, T315I, F359V/C) and/or dasatinib (DAS; V299L, T315I/A, F317L/I/V/C). Therefore, mutation analysis is recommended for CML patients (pts) after imatinib failure to facilitate selection of appropriate therapy. However, around 40% of chronic phase (CP) pts without these NIL/DAS resistant mutations also fail second line inhibitor therapy. For imatinib resistant pts without these mutations at the time of commencing NIL/DAS therapy (switchover) we investigated whether sensitive mutation analysis could identity pts at risk of poor response to subsequent therapy. Switchover samples of 220 imatinib resistant pts (DAS n=131, NIL n=89) were analysed by direct sequencing (detection limit 10–20%) and sensitive, high throughput mass spectrometry (mass spec; Sequenom MassARRAY, detection limit 0.05–0.5%), which detects 31 common BCR-ABL1 mutations (approximately 89% of mutations detected in pts receiving imatinib). We previously demonstrated that mass spec could detect NIL/DAS resistant mutations at switchover in an extra 9% of pts compared to sequencing and that these low level resistant mutations were associated with subsequent failure of these inhibitors (Parker et al, JCO. 2011 In Press). Therefore, for the current analysis, pts with NIL/DAS resistant mutations detected by either method (n=45) were excluded since response is already known to be poor in these cases. In the switchover samples of the remaining 175 pts, 159 mutations were detected in 86 pts by mass spec, but just 108 mutations were detected in 89 pts by sequencing. Thirteen rare mutations detected by sequencing were not included in the mass spec assay design. Mass spec detected all other mutations detected by sequencing, plus an additional 64 low level mutations. Multiple NIL/DAS sensitive mutations (≥2 mutations) were detected at switchover in more of the 175 pts by mass spec (34/175, 19%; 2–9 mutations per pt) than sequencing (16/175, 9%; 2–3 mutations per pt), P=.009. We divided pts into 2 groups; those with multiple mutations detected by mass spec at switchover (n=34) and those with 0/1 mutation (n=141), and investigated the impact of multiple mutations on response to subsequent NIL/DAS therapy. Pts with 0 or 1 mutation, and similarly pts with 2 or >2 mutations, were grouped together, as no difference in response was observed. The median follow up for CP, accelerated phase and blast crisis pts was 17 (2–33), 18 (1–33) and 3 (1–27) mo, and the frequency of multiple mutations was 18%, 24% and 18%, respectively. During follow up, multiple mutations at switchover was associated with lower rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR; 21% vs 50%, P=.003, Fig 1A) and major molecular response (MMR; 6% vs 31%, P=.005, Fig 1B), and a higher incidence of acquiring new NIL/DAS resistant mutations detectable by sequencing (56% vs 25%, P=.0009, Fig 1C). At 18 mo, the failure-free survival rate (European LeukemiaNet recommendations) for CP pts with multiple mutations at switchover was 33% compared to 51% for CP pts with 0 or 1 mutation (P=.26, Fig 1D). The number of mutations detected per pt by mass spec at switchover (max of 9, 8 of 86 pts with mutations had ≥4, 9%) far exceeded the number concurrently detected by sequencing (max of 3). This suggests that mass spec detected a pool of subclonal mutants, each with a small survival advantage after imatinib therapy that was insufficient for their clonal predominance. Multiple low level mutations may be a marker of an increased propensity for subsequent selection of resistant mutations, possibly driven by genetic instability, demonstrating the advantage of a sensitive multiplex mutation assay. In conclusion, sensitive mutation analysis identified a poor-risk subgroup with multiple mutations that were not identified by sequencing. This subgroup represented 15.5% of the total cohort (34/220), who would not otherwise be classified as being at risk of poor response on the basis of their mutation status. These pts did not have NIL/DAS resistant mutations at switchover; however, they had a lower incidence of CCyR and MMR, and higher incidence of acquiring new NIL/DAS resistant mutations during NIL/DAS therapy compared to pts with 0 or 1 mutation. This poor-risk subgroup may warrant closer monitoring or experimental approaches to reduce the high risk of kinase inhibitor failure after imatinib resistance. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Quality of Life Scores Improve with Increasing Hemoglobin but Optimal Thresholds Vary According to Transfusion Dependence and Clinical Risk Scores: A Canadian Cross Sectional Study of 689 Patients with 2969 Measurements

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3192.3192 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3192-3192

Author(s):

Rena Buckstein ◽

Richard A. Wells ◽

Nancy Y Zhu ◽

Michelle Geddes ◽

Mitchell Sabloff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Risk Scores ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

And Function

Abstract Background : We previously presented that selected quality of life (QOL) domains in MDS patients are impaired compared with age-matched controls and most impacted by hemoglobin (Hgb) level, transfusion dependence, frailty and comorbidity in an initial cohort of 236 patients from a Canadian MDS registry (Buckstein R. et al, Abstract 699, ASH 2012 and Abstract 2500, ASH 2009). The optimal Hgb threshold associated with improved QOL may vary according to health states that may fluctuate for any given patient. With longer follow up and greater sample size, we now examine the impact of Hgb levels on QOL in transfusion dependent (TD) versus independent (TI) patients and according to IPSS-R risk scores. Methods:Since 2008, we have prospectively assessed QOL in all patients registered in the Canadian national MDS registry using the instruments EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-F, global fatigue scale (GFS) and EQ-5D, at enrollment and every 4-6 months. These QOL data are paired with disease specific and laboratory information at the same time intervals. Each patient could provide multiple QOL measurements at different time points. Clinically significant score differences were considered 10 points for the EORTC, 0.08 for the EQ-5D and 4 for the FACT F. General linear regression analysis was applied to search for a significant relationship between physical and social functioning, dyspnea, fatigue and QOL with Hgb, according to transfusion dependence, IPSS and IPSS-R measured categorically. To account for multiple comparisons among 5 Hgb categories, Bonferroni adjusted p-value < .01 was considered statistically significant. Results: 689 patients from 15 Canadian sites completed their first QOL assessment at a median time of 7.8 (IQR 2.7-23) months from MDS diagnosis. The median time from MDS diagnosis to death or last follow-up was 2.5 years (IQR 1.2-4.9). The median Hgb at enrollment was 100 g/L (IQR 86-113) and the distribution of risk scores included: very low (13%); low (35%); intermediate (28%); high (15%); and very high (10%). 27% of patients were TD at enrollment and 54% were TD at any time. The median number of QOL assessments per patient completed was 3 (IQR 2-6) with 547 patients completing at least 2, 424 at least 3 and 335 at least 4 serial QOL measurements at a median time interval of 17 weeks (IQR 13-25). When examined by Hgb thresholds, mean physical functioning, dyspnea, fatigue (QLQ-C30 and GFS) and global QOL improved with increasing Hgb. QOL symptom and function scores were clinically and statistically significantly superior in TI versus TD patients (table 1). The optimal discriminating Hgb threshold for improved symptom and function scores was 100 g/L for patients that were TI or with IPSS-R very low, low and intermediate risk MDS; and 90 g/L for high and very high risk disease (table 2). No discriminating threshold was found in TD patients. Conclusions: In the largest reported serial cross sectional population based assessment of QOL in MDS patients, we confirm that higher Hgb and transfusion independence have significant impact on QOL, symptoms and self-reported function and should be considered important surrogate endpoints for clinical improvement. Disclosures Buckstein: Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wells:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: advisory board; Alexion: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board. Zhu:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Geddes:Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Sabloff:Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Research Funding. Leber:BMS Canada: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Keating:Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Storring:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Leitch:Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. St-Hilaire:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nevill:Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Shamy:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Delage:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Body Mass Index and Survival of Patients with Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139402 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2-3

Author(s):

Dai Chihara ◽

Melissa C. Larson ◽

Dennis P. Robinson ◽

Carrie A. Thompson ◽

Matthew J. Maurer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Body Mass Index ◽

At Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Body Mass ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

The United States ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact

Background: Obesity is increasing worldwide, with the highest prevalence in the United States. High or low body mass index (BMI) is a well-established risk factor for increased all-cause mortality and also has been associated with cancer-specific mortality. However, the impact of BMI on survival following diagnosis with lymphoma currently remains controversial. We leveraged a prospective cohort of lymphoma patients to assess the relationship of BMI two years prior to diagnosis (BMI-2), at diagnosis (BMI-dx), and three-years post-diagnosis (BMI+3) with lymphoma-specific survival (LSS) as the primary endpoint and with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints. Patient and Method: Patients were prospectively enrolled at lymphoma diagnosis to the SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort at Mayo Clinic and University of Iowa from 2002-2015. BMI-2 and BMI+3 were self-reported in patient questionnaires, while BMI-dx was extracted from the medical chart. Patients with extreme BMI (BMI <14 and BMI ≥50) were excluded from the analysis. BMI change from BMI-2 to BMI-dx and from BMI-dx to BMI+3 was categorized as no change (-5% to 5%), decrease (>-5%), and increase (>+5%). Person-time at risk was assessed from lymphoma diagnosis until death or last follow-up, except for analyses of BMI change from BMI-dx to BMI+3, which started person-time at risk when the 3-year (+/- 6 months) follow-up questionnaire was returned. Cause of death was assigned by a study clinician. For all lymphoma patients combined and in the most common subtypes, we evaluated the association of BMI at each time point and change in BMI with EFS, LSS, and OS using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from multivariable adjusted Cox models. Results: A total of 4,009 lymphoma patients (including 670 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], 689 follicular lymphoma [FL] and 1018 chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma [CLL/SLL] and 1,632 others) with data on BMI-dx were included. Among them, 2,955 patients had BMI-2 and 2,004 had BMI+3 and were evaluable for change in BMI. The median age of all patients at diagnosis was 61 years (range 18-92 years), and 94% of patients had ECOG performance status <2. At the time of diagnosis, 28% were normal weight (BMI 18.5-25), 1% were underweight (BMI <18.5), 39% were overweight (BMI 25-30) and 32% were obese (BMI ≥30). With a median follow-up of 108 months from diagnosis (IQR 83-143 months), 1320 deaths were observed, 48% of which were due to lymphoma. Patients with FL who were obese at BMI-2 had significantly shorter LSS (HR: 3.02, 95%CI: 1.43-6.41, p=0.004). Associations between obesity at BMI-2 and LSS were not evident for DLBCL (HR: 1.04, 95%CI: 0.62-1.76, p=0.879) or CLL/SLL (HR: 1.10, 95%CI: 0.71-1.70, p=0.668) (Table). BMI-dx was not associated with LSS in any lymphoma patients, except that DLBCL patients who were underweight at BMI-dx (n=10) experienced shorter LSS (HR: 3.52, 95%CI: 1.22-10.1, p=0.020). This correlated significantly with presence of B symptoms (p=0.004) and may signify aggressive disease. Across all subtypes, >5% decrease in BMI from BMI-2 to BMI-dx was associated with significantly shorter LSS in patients with (HR: 2.02, 95%CI: 1.65-2.48, p<0.001). However, only for FL patients, >5% increase in BMI from BMI-dx to BMI+3 also was associated with significantly shorter LSS in subsequent years (HR: 3.74, 95%CI: 1.30-10.8, p=0.014). The associations reported for LSS generally were similar for EFS and OS. Conclusions: FL patients with obesity prior to diagnosis or who experienced increasing BMI after the diagnosis had significantly shorter LSS. The impact of weight control after the diagnosis of FL patient outcomes warrants investigation. Figure Disclosures Maurer: Celgene / BMS: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flowers:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; OptumRx: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cerhan:NanoString: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Who Received Third Line Therapy at the Christie NHS Foundation Trust in the UK

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148490 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5011-5011

Author(s):

Kim Linton ◽

Cristina Julian ◽

Adam Gibb ◽

Ellie White ◽

Emma-Frances Armstrong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Index Date ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Time Period ◽

Third Line ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Background: There are limited data on real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for follicular lymphoma (FL) in the relapsed/refractory (r/r) setting, with shorter response durations reported after each relapse (Link et al, 2019; Rivas-Delgado et al, 2019 and Batlevi et al, 2020). We examined treatment patterns for patients with FL initiating third line (3L) therapy at a single institution by time period in the post-rituximab era (2004-2010 and 2011-2020), and clinical outcomes for the overall cohort receiving therapy between 2004 and 2020. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational study of patients with FL who initiated 3L therapy between 2004 and 2020 in routine clinical practice at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK. We selected patients aged ≥18 years at 3L initiation, with histologically documented FL Grade 1−3a treated with two prior lines of systemic therapy including an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and an alkylating agent, and at least one year of follow-up after initiating 3L therapy; follow-up ended June 2021. We excluded patients with grade 3b FL or transformation to high grade lymphoma any time before 3L treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) to 3L therapy was calculated, and overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method with 3L therapy initiation date as the index date. Results: Overall, 41 patients met all eligibility criteria; 11 and 30 patients received 3L therapy between 2004-2010 and 2011-2020, respectively. Median age at index date was 59 years and 53.7% were male; 73.2% had grade 1 or 2 FL; 78.1% had advanced stage (III/IV) FL at diagnosis. Median follow-up was 33.9 (IQR: 14.5, 63.0) months, and median time from diagnosis to 3L treatment was 60.2 (IQR: 29.4, 89.1) months. The most common regimen in 3L was rituximab plus bendamustine (R-benda) followed by rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and rituximab used as a single agent (R-mono). Treatment patterns differed by time period (Table 1). R-benda was more commonly used between 2011 and 2020. The most common sequence was rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) followed by R-CHOP and R-benda (Figure 1). ORR to 3L treatment was 61.0%, CR 29.3%. Median OS, PFS and TTNT with 95% confidence interval (CI) were 70.0 (30.2-NR), 19.2 (9.5-34.7) and 11.8 (9.0-27.6) months after 3L initiation, respectively. Two- and five-year OS rates were 79% and 50%, and two-year PFS rate was 37%. Conclusions: Patients with r/r FL treated in the routine 3L setting have highly variable treatment patterns and unfavorable outcomes, representing a continued unmet medical need. This study is limited by its small size and evolving treatments, warranting a larger study of more recently treated 3L patients to evaluate the impact of modern treatment pathways and novel therapies on clinical outcomes for r/r FL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Linton: University of Manchester: Current Employment; BeiGene: Research Funding; Hartley Taylor: Honoraria; Genmab: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Julian: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Gibb: The Christie NHS Foundation Trust: Current Employment; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Li: Genesis Research: Current Employment. Liu: Genesis Research: Current Employment. Shewade: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Radford: BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.

Download Full-text

Hemophilia Natural History Study (ATHN 7): Baseline Characteristics, Adverse Events, and Self-Reported Health Status of Individuals with Hemophilia a and B

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137696 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2-3

Author(s):

Tyler W. Buckner ◽

Shannon L Carpenter ◽

Stacy E. Croteau ◽

Adam Cuker ◽

Nabil Daoud ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Health Status ◽

Natural History ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Skin Reactions

INTRODUCTION The recent introduction of new therapies for hemophilia A and B (HA and HB) mandates careful monitoring of the safety of these treatments as their use becomes more widespread. The American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) collects information about the use of all HA and HB therapies through the more than 140 ATHN-affiliated hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs) in the United States (US). The primary aim of ATHN 7: A Natural History Cohort Study of the Safety, Effectiveness, and Practice of Treatment for People with Hemophilia is to monitor the safety of current hemophilia therapies. Secondary aims include assessment over time of real-world effectiveness and patient experience of current therapies. METHODS ATHN 7 is being sponsored by ATHN. It is a longitudinal, prospective cohort study being conducted at over 20 ATHN-affiliated sites in the US. The study is approved by central and local institutional review boards. Any person with a diagnosis of congenital hemophilia A or B (factor VIII or IX activity < 50%) who receives care at a participating site is eligible for inclusion. All participants and parents/guardians sign informed consents and assents prior to participation. Patients are excluded if they have any other known bleeding disorder. Adverse events, including those events designated by the European Haemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) group as well as other adverse events of special interest, are recorded and monitored. Demographic and clinical information are collected at baseline and at least quarterly through patient interview and medical record review. Health status is measured using the 5-level EuroQoL-5D questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Descriptive statistics of the baseline medical history and demographic data are used to characterize the study population. RESULTS The first participant consented to ATHN 7 in February 2019. As of 06/30/2020, a total of 367 subjects were enrolled in the study from 24 sites. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatments are shown in Table 1. Most participants (69.9%) had severe HA. Approximately half of the participants were being treated with clotting factor as their primary therapy and half with a bispecific antibody. Adverse events reported to date include allergic reactions/redness at the injection site, rash unrelated to treatment, and a severe subdural hematoma due to a fall, all in patients receiving emicizumab (Table 2). At baseline, problems with mobility, self-care, and completing usual activities were reported by 32.9%, 13.0%, and 33.7% of participants, respectively. Problems with pain and anxiety were reported by 52.4% and 34.1% of participants (Figure 1). The average health status rating was 83.4 out of 100 (Figure 2). DISCUSSION These results demonstrate the capability of ATHN 7 to enroll a large cohort of subjects from multiple sites, monitor safety events, and assess outcomes related to living with and being treated for HA and HB. Adverse events attributed to any hemophilia therapy have been limited to minor skin reactions and have not led to product discontinuation. One subject experienced a trauma-related subdural hemorrhage, which provides important information on the risk of bleeding from severe/significant trauma in those receiving emicizumab. We provide a sobering picture of the high prevalence of difficulties with activities of daily living, pain, and mental health concerns. Despite many advances in therapy, hemophilia continues to have a real, everyday impact on the lives of our patients. CONCLUSIONS During the first 16 months of enrollment in the ATHN 7 study, we observed skin reactions, as well as one severe, unanticipated bleeding event due to trauma. At baseline, pain, anxiety/depression, and impaired physical function were concerns for a significant proportion of the individuals in the study. Disclosures Buckner: Tremeau Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; uniQure: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Kedrion: Consultancy; Spark: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Biomarin: Consultancy. Carpenter:Hemostasis & Thrombosis Research Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; American Academy of Pediatrics: Other: PREP Heme/Onc editorial board; Shire: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria; Kedrion: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria. Croteau:ATHN: Research Funding; National Hemophilia Foundation: Honoraria; Spark Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Hemophilia Federation of America: Honoraria; CSL-Behring: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Sigilon Therapeutics: Consultancy. Cuker:Synergy CRO: Consultancy; Alexion: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Spark Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kempton:Spark Therapeutics: Honoraria; Octapharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Malec:SOBI: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; CSL: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Raffini:XaTek: Other: Advisory Board; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; HemaBiologics: Other: Advisory Board; Roche: Other: Advisory Board. Staber:Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Wang:CSL Behring: Honoraria; Biomarin: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Bioverativ Inc: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Recht:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Spark: Research Funding; uniQure: Consultancy, Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: personal fees, Research Funding; BioMarin: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: personal fees; Genentech: Consultancy, Other: personal fees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Other: personal fees.

Download Full-text

An Ongoing Global, Longitudinal, Observational Study of Patients with Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency: The PEAK Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123059 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2223-2223

Author(s):

Rachael F. Grace ◽

Paola Bianchi ◽

Bertil Glader ◽

Andreas Glenthøj ◽

Bryan Jones ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Natural History ◽

Blood Cell ◽

Longitudinal Data ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Pyruvate Kinase ◽

Red Blood Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Natural History Study ◽

Equity Ownership

Pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency is an autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in the PKLR gene that lead to reduced red blood cell PK (PK-R) enzyme activity. This rare hereditary glycolytic enzymopathy, with over 300 causative PKLR mutations identified to date, results in defective red blood cell glycolysis and hemolytic anemia. While the clinical presentation is variable, patients with PK deficiency may experience symptoms of hemolytic anemia, most commonly fatigue (sometimes extreme), jaundice, and dyspnea. No disease-specific therapy currently exists and treatment is limited to supportive care, including red blood cell transfusions, splenectomy/cholecystectomy, and iron chelation. Affected neonates may need phototherapy or exchange transfusions for severe hyperbilirubinemia. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation may cure the disease but experience is limited and the outcome is variable. Due the rarity of PK deficiency, its prevalence, clinical burden, and long-term clinical course are not well defined. To address this gap, Boston Children's Hospital is nearing completion of the observational PK deficiency Natural History Study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02053480; N=254) to better understand the natural history and clinical burden of the disease. This longitudinal analysis (2-year follow-up) will report on PK deficiency-related signs, symptoms, and treatment outcomes. In order to continue and expand upon the collection of longitudinal data for PK deficiency, the Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Global Longitudinal Registry (the PEAK Registry; NCT03481738) was developed. This registry study is a global, longitudinal, observational study for adult and pediatric patients with PK deficiency. Its primary objective is to record the natural history, treatment, outcomes, variability in clinical manifestations, and disease burden of patients with PK deficiency. Secondary objectives include data collection to assess the prevalence, incidence, and complications associated with PK deficiency; evaluate pregnancy outcomes; and investigate possible phenotype-genotype correlations. The study also aims to provide longitudinal data to assist physicians with the clinical management of individual patients. In order to maximize the amount of longitudinal data available, a novel data management system is being employed to harmonize Natural History Study and PEAK Registry data. Approximately 500 patients will be enrolled over 7 years at an estimated 60 study centers in up to 20 countries in the 9-year study. All enrolled patients will be followed prospectively for at least 2 years and up to 9 years. Site and patient recruitment began in 2018. As of July 2019, 43 sites in 11 countries are active (Figure) and site recruitment has begun in Thailand, South Korea, and Australia. An update on patient enrollment will be provided. Disclosures Grace: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Bianchi:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Glader:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Glenthøj:Celgene: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Alexion: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Jones:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kanno:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Kuo:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy. Layton:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cerus Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. van Beers:Pfizer: Research Funding; RR Mechatronics: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Xu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Follow-up of More Than 5 Years in a Cohort of Patients with Hemophilia B Treated with Fidanacogene Elaparvovec Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150541 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3975-3975

Author(s):

Ben J. Samelson-Jones ◽

Spencer K. Sullivan ◽

John E.J. Rasko ◽

Adam Giermasz ◽

Lindsey A. George ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Hemophilia B ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Adeno Associated Virus ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Fifteen patients with moderately severe to severe hemophilia B (factor IX [FIX] activity ≤2%) were treated with fidanacogene elaparvovec at a dose of 5e11 vg/kg as part of a phase 1/2a study. The study was 52 weeks in duration, after which patients were eligible to enroll in the long-term follow-up (LTFU) study of up to 5 years. All 15 patients completed the phase 1/2a study, and 14 patients were subsequently enrolled in the LTFU study. At the time of the data cut (December 2020), 13 patients were enrolled in the LTFU study, with follow-up ranging from >2.5 years to >5 years following vector administration. Over this period of time, fidanacogene elaparvovec remained generally well tolerated. As reported previously, 3 patients were treated with corticosteroids within the first 6 months of the phase 1/2a study. No patients have required treatment or re-treatment with corticosteroids in the LTFU study. There were no serious adverse events (SAEs) in the phase 1/2a study, and 3 patients reported SAEs in the LTFU study, none of which were considered treatment related. No patient developed an inhibitor or had a thrombotic event. No patients have developed hepatic masses or significant elevations in alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Annual liver ultrasounds revealed only hepatic steatosis in one patient. Mean FIX activity levels by year remain in the mild hemophilia severity range: 22.8%, year 1 (n=15); 25.4%, year 2 (n=14); 22.9%, year 3 (n=14); 24.9%, year 4 (n=9); and 19.8%, year 5 (n=7) when evaluated centrally using the ACTIN/FSL one-stage assay. These levels have been associated with mean annualized bleeding rates ranging from 0-0.9 over the course of follow-up, and no patients have resumed FIX prophylaxis. Four patients have undergone 6 surgical procedures during the LTFU study, 4 elective and 2 emergent. There were no bleeding complications with these procedures, and the 2 emergent procedures (appendectomy and lumbar discectomy) were performed without the need of additional FIX. Overall, this represents the largest cohort of hemophilia B patients with a duration of follow-up up to 5 years following treatment with an adeno-associated virus gene therapy expressing a highly active variant of FIX. Fidanacogene elaparvovec remains generally well tolerated over a period up to 5 years postinfusion. While encouraging, more long-term data in a larger cohort of patients are needed to further characterize the safety and durability of fidanacogene elaparvovec, which is under way in an ongoing phase 3 study. Disclosures Samelson-Jones: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spark: Research Funding. Sullivan: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rasko: Imago: Consultancy; Cynata: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gene Technology Technical Advisory Board: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NHMRC Mitochondrial Donation Expert Working Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Australian Cancer Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cure the Future Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; FSHD Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Australian Government: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Inc: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Spark: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; bluebird bio: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Genea: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Giermasz: BioMarin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; ATHN: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy; UniQure: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sangamo Therapeutics,: Research Funding. George: CSL Behring: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Avrobio: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee . Ducore: Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; HEMA Biologics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Teitel: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spark: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy. McGuinn: Biogen: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Shire/Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spark: Research Funding. O'Brien: Pfizer Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Winburn: Pfizer Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Smith: Pfizer Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Chhabra: Pfizer Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Rupon: Pfizer Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company.

Download Full-text

Diagnosis of Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Related Conditions: Rates of Discordance between Local and Central Review in the NHLBI MDS Natural History Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116629 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4370-4370 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ling Zhang ◽

Donald M Stablein ◽

Pearlie Epling-Burnette ◽

Alexandra M. Harrington ◽

Lynn C. Moscinski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Natural History ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Diagnostic Errors ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Natural History Study ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Blast Count

Abstract Background Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a collection of hematopoietic disorders with widely variable prognoses and treatment options. Pathologic diagnosis can be challenging and misdiagnosis can impact patient therapy and outcome. How commonly misdiagnosis occurs, and the severity of diagnostic errors, is not known. Here, we report interim analyses of patients (pts) with cytopenia and suspected MDS from the NHLBI National MDS Natural History Study (https://thenationalmdsstudy.net ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02775383) assessing MDS occurrence and rates of agreement on classification of MDS/MDS-related disorders by local and centralized review. Methods Pts with cytopenias and clinically suspected MDS were identified between 6/16 and 6/18 from 84 participating centers in this ongoing multi-Institutional Cooperative Group study, with a goal of recruiting 2000 MDS (WHO 2016 subcategories), MDS/MPN or low blast count acute myeloid leukemia (AML, <30% blasts without core binding factor) and 500 cases with idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) from both NCI community oncology research program (NCORP) and lead academic participating sites. Centrally submitted clinical and pathologic data and bone marrow samples were analyzed by pathologists in the central laboratory & biorepository (CL/B) blinded to the original site's diagnosis, with a third-level review for cases with disagreement between the local and CL/B assignment. Disagreements in the 5 categories detailed in Figure 1 were considered clinically meaningful. Cases were assigned to longitudinal (MDS, MDS/MPN, ICUS, low blast count AML) versus cross-sectional (other cytopenias or cancers) cohorts after central classification based on clinical, pathologic, and cytogenetic features. Interrater-agreement was evaluated with the Kappa statistic. Results Of 375 pts for whom data and samples were submitted with completed classification, 88 (23%) had MDS, 15 (4%) MDS/MPN, 12 (3%) ICUS, 23 (8%) AML, and 237 (63%) other cytopenias (Figure 1). The median age of all pts was 71 years (range, 20-92), 44% were female, and median baseline blood counts and other baseline measures are in Figure 2. MDS pts had single lineage dysplasia (SLD, 0), SLD with ring sideroblasts (RS, 9 (10%)), multi-lineage dysplasia (MLD, 17 (19%)), MLD -RS (18 (20%)), excess blasts I (EB, 14 (16%)), EBII (19 (22%)), del(5q) (6 (7%)), and MDS-U (5(6%)). IPSS-R categories were defined in 51 of 88 MDS cases (58%): Very Low (27%), Low (43%), Intermediate (27%), High (16%), and Very High (14%). Overall site/central agreement on diagnosis occurred in 225 cases (60%) with inconsistency associated with recognized site coding errors resolved in 54 cases (14%) without 3rd party review. Seventy-eight others (21%) were referred to 3rd level review; confirmation of CL/B classification occurred in 49/78 cases (63%), agreement with site in 13/78 (17%), and a different diagnosis in 16/78 (21%). Clinically meaningful changes in diagnoses between local and central review occurred 26% of the time (Figure 1, n=97/375 kappa =.53 95% CI (.45, .61)). Site assigned MDS was changed to ICUS or other cytopenia in 35% (n=34/99); and to AML in 3% (n=3/99). For cases with site assignment to other causes of cytopenias (225 of 375 cases, 60%), central assignment identified ICUS in 3, MDS/MPN overlap in 8, AML in 2 and MDS in 22, totaling a change in diagnosis in 16%. Of note, 60% (15/25) of ICUS diagnosed locally were interpreted as reactive marrow or normal according to central review. Within MDS cases diagnosed locally, the greatest discrepancy was observed in the MDS-U classification, reported 31 times (31/99 31%) but confirmed in only 2 cases (6%), with 22 (71%) found to not have MDS. Across the study when compared to local assignment, central review changed the follow-up cohort assignment for 87 pts (23%). Conclusions In this well-characterized series of pts evaluated for MDS with bone marrow biopsy and paired site/central morphologic assessment, 40% of site diagnoses were changed at central review and site coding errors were common. In 26%, the changes were clinically meaningful, potentially affecting patient treatment and prognosis. In particular, site designation of MDS-U was an unreliable classification category, which could only partially be attributed to miscoding errors at the local site. Incorporating genomics data might help refine MDS diagnoses. Disclosures Bejar: Genoptix: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Modus Outcomes: Consultancy; Astex/Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy. Komrokji:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Scott:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sekeres:Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Comparable Outcomes between Unrelated Donor (8/8 or 7/8 matched) and Haploidentical Donor for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130419 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4619-4619

Author(s):

Jee Yon Shin ◽

Sung-Soo Park ◽

Gi June Min ◽

Silvia Park ◽

Sung-Eun Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Sibling Donor ◽

Alternative Donor ◽

Matched Sibling ◽

Grade Ii

Background Either allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) from HLA-matched sibling donor or immunosuppressive therapy (IST) has been recommended as one of the standard treatments for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Regarding only 30% of chance finding HLA‐matched sibling donor, SCT from an alternative donor including unrelated (URD) or haplo-identical related donor (HAPLO) is considered to be a treatment option after failure to IST in patients who lack of a HLA-matched sibling donor. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of URD SCT and HAPLO SCT for SAA patients. Method Consecutive 152 adult patients with SAA who received first SCT between March 2002 and May 2018 were included: 73 of HLA-well-matched (8/8) URD (WM-URD), 34 of HLA-mismatched URD (MM-URD), and 45 of HAPLO. With the intention to have a follow-up period at least 1 year, data were analyzed at May 2019. A conditioning regimen with total body irradiation (TBI) and cyclophosphamide was used for URD-SCT, whereas that with TBI and fludarabine was administered for HAPLO-SCT (Lee et al, BBMT 2011;17:101, Park et al, BBMT 2017;23:1498, Lee et al, Am J Hematol 2018;93:1368). The combination of tacrolimus and methotrexate were used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Results The median follow-up was 53.4 (range, 0.2-174.1) months. The median age of URD and HAPLO cohort was 30 (range 18-59) and 34 (range 18-59) years, respectively. Except for one and three patients who failed respective a neutrophil and platelet engraftment, other patients achieved neutrophil and platelet engraftments with median 11 and 15 days for WM-URD, 13 and 16.5 days for MM-URD, and 12 and 14 days for HAPLO, respectively. The five-years overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and cumulative incidences (CIs) of graft-failure and transplant-related mortality were similar among three groups: 88.3%, 85.5%, 2.7%, and 11.7% for WM-URD; 81.7%, 81.7%, 0%, and 18.3% for MM-URD, and 86.3%, 84.1%, 6.7%, and 9.2% for HAPLO. The 180-days CI of grade II-IV acute GVHD in WM-URD, MM-URD and HAPLO were 35.6%, 52.9%, and 28.9%, respectively; and moderate to severe chronic GVHD were 28.7%, 38.7% and 11.8% in respective cohort. The CI of grade II-IV acute GVHD and moderate to severe chronic GVHD were significantly higher in MM-URD than those in HAPLO (both, p=0.026). ATG is the only factor affecting both grade II-IV acute GVHD (Hazard ratio 0.511, p=0.01) and moderate to severe chronic GVHD (Hazard ratio 0.378, p=0.003) in multivariate analysis. Other complications including CMV DNAemia, hemorrhagic cystitis, invasive fungal disease, secondary malignancy, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome were similar among three groups. Survival outcomes of a subgroup of ≥ 2 allele MM-URD (n=16) extracted form MM-URD were inferior that of other donor types (n=136): 75.0% vs. 86.9% (p=0.163) for 5-year OS and 75.0% vs. 84.7% (p=0.272) for 5-year FFS. Conclusion This study shows that there were no significant differences between alternative donor sources in the absence of suitable matched sibling donor. Host/donor features and urgency of transplant should drive physician towards the best choice among alternative donor sources for SAA patients treated with SCT. However, selection of ≥ 2 allele MM-URD should not be recommended due to high incidence of GVHD and inferior outcomes. Figure Disclosures Kim: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Hanmi: Consultancy, Honoraria; AGP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SL VaxiGen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Yuhan: Honoraria; Sanofi-Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Handok: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BL & H: Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria. Lee:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Achillion: Research Funding.

Download Full-text