Outcomes of Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agents (HMA) in Adult Patients with KMT2A-Rearranged Leukemias

Abstract Background Rearrangements of lysine methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A) gene, previously known as the MLL gene, occur in 3 to 5% of adult patients with de novo AML and are enriched in therapy-related disease after treatment with topoisomerase II inhibitors (Bill, M et al. PNAS. 2020). KMT2A encodes a histone H3 lysine 4 methyltransferase and KMT2A rearrangements result in fusion proteins that induce aberrant Hox gene expression. (Armstrong, SA et al. Nature. 2002) Among patients with KMT2A rearranged AML (rAML) receiving intensive chemotherapy, the fusion partner impacts prognosis, and KMT2A-MLLT3 is associated with an intermediate risk while other KMT2A rearrangements are associated with adverse risk in the ELN classification. (Dohner, H et al. Blood. 2017) Here we evaluate the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML with KMT2A rearrangements receiving venetoclax and hypomethylating agents (HMA). Methods Medical records of 333 patients with newly diagnosed or R/R AML receiving venetoclax in combination with HMAs at City of Hope National Medical Center between 11/1/2015 and 4/15/2020 were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion were a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of AML, age > 18 years, treatment with either decitabine or azacitidine in combination with venetoclax. KMT2A rearrangements were detected by karyotype and confirmed by FISH or RNA sequencing. Responses were evaluated per the ELN criteria (Dohner, H et al. Blood. 2017) Minimal residual disease flow cytometry was performed at the University of Washington. Patient characteristics were summarized by frequency and associations between overall response and patient and disease characteristics were tested by Fisher's exact test. OS was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the difference between groups was determined by log-rank test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and Prism. Results We identified 18 patients (5.4%) with KMT2A rAML who met criteria for inclusion. MLLT3 was the predominant fusion partner, occurring in nine patients followed by ELL (n=2), AFDN (n=2), MLLT6 (n=1), MLLT10 (n=1), AFF1 (n=1), CBL (n=1), and TET1 (n=1). The cohort included both newly diagnosed (n=10) and R/R (n=8) AML patients. 44% had therapy-related or secondary AML. NRAS or KRAS mutations occurred in 4 out of 13 patients (31%) with available sequencing prior to treatment. Decitabine was the predominant HMA used in combination with venetoclax and 56% of all patients received 10-day dosing during the first cycle. For the total cohort, 9 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 50%), including 8 patients with a complete remission (CR/CRi 44%) and 1 (6%) patient with a morphologic leukemia free state, Figure 1. All six of the responders who were tested for MRD were negative. For treatment naïve patients, we observed a CR/CRi rate of 70% and a median survival of 11 months. On univariate analysis, R/R disease was the only factor associated with a significant decrease in response (ORR 12.5% vs. 80%, p=0.015, Table 1). With a median follow-up of 14.4 months for responding patients, median OS for the cohort was 6.59 months and 19.15 months for responding patients (Figure 2). The presence of NRAS or KRAS mutations was the only factor significantly impacting survival (HR 6.04, log rank 0.05, Table 1). Notably, the KMT2A fusion partner type did not impact response or survival. Allogeneic stem cell transplant was performed in 4 out of 9 (44%) responding patients. Conclusion Here, we show that venetoclax in combination with HMA led to a high rate of response and prolonged survival in a high-risk KMT2A rAML population. The outcomes of newly diagnosed KMT2A rAML patients after treatment with venetoclax and HMA in this study are similar to chemotherapy outcomes in patients aged < 60 years (CR 68% and median OS 0.9 months; Bill, M et al. PNAS. 2020). Consistent with previous studies, we found that MLLT3 was the most common fusion partner, occurring in 50% of patients and that RAS mutations were also common (~30%). In contrast to what has been reported for chemotherapy outcomes and in the ELN classification, the KMT2A-MLLT3 translocation was not associated with improved outcomes when compared to other KMT2A translocations. While this study was limited in being retrospective and having a small and heterogeneous population, our findings suggest that venetoclax and HMA are effective in KMT2A rAML and warrant further investigation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Koller: Novartis: Consultancy. Al Malki: Hansa Biopharma: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy; Neximmune: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy. Aribi: Seagen: Consultancy. Ali: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marcucci: Novartis: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings; Agios: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings; Abbvie: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings. Pullarkat: AbbVie, Amgen, Genentech, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Dova, and Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Interim Results of An Ongoing Clinical Study Suggests Efficacy and Improved Toxicity Profile with Once a Week Bortezomib with Dexamethasone In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with Older Age and Co-Morbidities

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3061.3061 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3061-3061 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Nikhil C. Munshi ◽

Saem Lee ◽

Suman Kambhampati ◽

Abid Mohiuddin ◽

Michal Rose ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Previous History ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Current Time ◽

Overall Response

Abstract Abstract 3061 The current bortezomib schedule involves administration of the drug twice a week at 1.3 mg/m2 for 2 weeks every 21 days. This regimen although effective is inconvenient and associated with side effects including neuropathy and gastrointestinal toxicities that limits its use in a proportion of patients. Therefore, to improve convenience and compliance, we have investigated efficacy and safety of a weekly regimen of bortezomib. In this one-stage phase II multi-center, open-label single-arm study bortezomib is administered once a week at 1.6 mg/m2 in combination with dexamethasone in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients not considered for autologous stem cell transplant in participating Veterans Hospitals nationwide. The objective is to evaluate overall response rate and toxicity of this regimen. Patients received bortezomib at 1.6 mg/m2 IV weekly for 4 weeks followed by 1 week off and dexamethasone 40mg PO on the day of and day after each dose of bortezomib. Patients may receive 6 such 5-week cycles. At the current time 32 patients (median age - 73; range 50–88) have been enrolled at 11 Veterans Administration Hospital across the U.S. Patients had significant co-morbidities including 61% with cardiovascular problems, 58% with diabetes and/or hyperlipidemia, 58% with elevation of serum creatinine, 26% with respiratory problems and 23% with previous history of cancer. All patients were at least on 5 daily medications. Of the 32 patients enrolled, 25 patients have received at least one cycle of therapy and were evaluable for toxicity and efficacy, while 6 patients have received less than one cycle of therapy and one patient has inadequate data. With a median of 4 cycles administered, this regimen was well tolerated. None of the patients have developed grade 3 neuropathy, while grade 1 neuropathy was observed only in 2 patients and one patient with grade 1 neuropathy at diagnosis had increase to grade 2. Dexamethasone dose was reduced in 29% patients while 6% required reduction in bortezomib dose to 1.3 mg/m2. Additionally, Grade ≥1 asthenia was observed in 42%, diarrhea in 35%, and thrombocytopenia in 26%. Four patients have died of co-morbidities which were considered unrelated or probably unrelated to the treatment with bortezomib. The partial response or better was achieved in 68% patients receiving at least 1 cycle of therapy; 20% patients achieved CR/nCR and additional 12% achieved VGPR. Including MR in the analysis, overall response was observed in all evaluable patients. On intent to treat analysis including all 32 patients, overall response rate (≥ MR) was observed in 78% patients and PR or better in 53% patients. These preliminary results suggest that the once a week bortezomib regimen is effective and tolerable with reduced toxicity even in this older patient population with significant co-morbidities. Disclosures: Munshi: Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roodman:Millennium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVD) in Combination with Vorinostat As Front-Line Therapy for Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results of a Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.336.336 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 336-336 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Jacob P. Laubach ◽

Alaina R. Mitchell ◽

Cathy Sharp ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Cardiopulmonary Arrest ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response

Abstract Abstract 336 Background: The combination of lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V), and dexamethasone (D) (RVD) in newly diagnosed MM patients is well tolerated and associated with a very high overall response rate (Richardson et al, Blood 2010; Kumar et al, Blood 2012). The addition of a novel targeted agent to RVD may improve depth of response as reflected by an increase in complete remission (CR) rate. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that vorinostat (Vor), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, is synergistic with bortezomib, immunomodulatory compounds and dexamethasone. Clinical studies in the relapsed setting using either bortezomib or lenalidomide with vorinostat have yielded promising results with manageable toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine the tolerability and activity of the combination of RVD with vorinostat in newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic MM. Methods: Patients (pts) received the classical RVD regimen (lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–14, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11 and dexamethasone 20/10 mg PO [cycles 1–4/5–8] days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 for up to 8 21 day cycles) combined with oral vorinostat (Vor), provided by Merck and Co. Inc., at 100, 200, 300 or 400 mg daily days 1 – 14 of each cycle. Pts were assigned to one of the four dosing cohorts according to the Bayesian Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) algorithm. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (Grade (G) 3 non hematologic toxicity, G4 hematologic toxicities defined as G4 thrombocytopenia of any duration; failure of recovery of neutrophils to 1,000/μL or platelets to 50,000/μL within 14 days of the last treatment; or inability to receive Day 1 dose for Cycle 2 due to continued drug-related toxicity from cycle 1) was determined in the first cycle of therapy. Toxicities were assessed and graded for all cycles using the NCI CTCAE v 3.0. Responses were assessed by modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Uniform Criteria. Pts with partial remission (PR) or better could proceed to autologous transplant after 4 cycles. After completion of 8 cycles, patients could continue maintenance with lenalidomide +/− bortezomib, with Vor not administered during maintenance therapy. Results: Thirty pts (median age 56 years [range 40–76], 63% men) were enrolled with 4 pts in cohort 1 (Vor 100mg), 15 pts in cohort 2 (Vor 200mg), 8 pts in cohort 3 (Vor 300 mg) and 3 pts in cohort 4 (Vor 400mg). The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 200 mg Vor with RVD. Including maintenance, the median number of cycles completed was 4 (range <1 to 41) with 5 pts completing less than 4 cycles, 4 because of toxicity and one for non-compliance. Ten patients completed 4 cycles and discontinued study therapy and proceeded to autologous stem cell transplant. Eleven pts completed 8 cycles with 8 pts remaining on study having completed between 4 and 41 cycles. Five DLTs have occurred, one in cohort 1 (syncope), one in cohort 2 (venous thromboembolism [VTE]) and 3 in cohort 4 (reversible G4 thrombocytopenia without bleeding; G3 reversible, asymptomatic elevated transaminases and G5 cardiopulmonary arrest, suspected to be due to VTE but not confirmed). The most common G1 or higher toxicities included thrombocytopenia (n=30), constipation (n=25), diarrhea (n=20), fatigue (n=19), nausea (n=16), and neuropathy (n=8). Grade 3 toxicities that occurred in 10% or more of pts were thrombocytopenia (n=8), fatigue (n=5), neutropenia (n=3), cardiovascular (n=3) and neuropathy (n=3). The overall response rate (PR or better) was 100% for the 29 evaluable pts, with a very good PR (VGPR) or better of 52% and a CR rate of 28%. For those pts who completed 4 cycles, VGPR and CR rates were 60% and 32% respectively and for pts who completed 8 cycles, the rates were 64% (VGPR) and 55% (CR). At a median follow up of 11.5 months (range 1 – 31 months) there has been only one pt with progressive disease (asymptomatic relapse from CR). Conclusion: The combination of RVD with vorinostat using the classical dose and schedule proved most tolerable at 200mg Vor dosing D1-14 every 21 days. The remarkably high VGPR/CR rate after 4 cycles and favorable progression free survival suggest that this combination is very effective. Alternative dosing and schedule of Vor may improve tolerability and so enhance clinical benefit, thus warranting further study. Disclosures: Kaufman: Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Off Label Use: use of vorinostat in myeloma; use of lenalidomide as induction. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Harvey:Celgene: Research Funding. Heffner:Millenium: Research Funding. Richardson:Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Orlowski:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, BMS, Onyx, Merck; all < $10,000 per year and disclosed to my institution: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Long Term Outcome of Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (Rd) Vs Melphalan-Lenalidomide-Prednisone (MPR) Vs Cyclophosphamide-Prednisone-Lenalidomide (CPR) As Induction Followed By Lenalidomide-Prednisone (RP) Vs Lenalidomide (R) As Maintenance in a Community-Based Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Population: Updated Analysis of EMN01 Phase III Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.901.901 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽

pp. 901-901

Author(s):

Sara Bringhen ◽

Massimo Offidani ◽

Pellegrino Musto ◽

Anna Marina Liberati ◽

Giulia Benevolo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Community Based ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Grade 3 ◽

To Receive

Abstract Introduction : Rd and MPR showed to be effective combinations in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients (pts). Cyclophosphamide is a less toxic alkylating alternative agent. EMN01 is the first trial to formally compare these three different Lenalidomide-based combinations. Maintenance with Lenalidomide has been recently approved in patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Few data are available about the best combination as maintenance in patients not eligible for ASCT. Methods : 662 pts with NDMM were randomized to receive 9 28-day cycles of Rd (lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days; dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1,8,15 and 22 in pts 65-75 years old and 20 mg in those >75 years), MPR (lenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days; melphalan orally 0.18 mg/Kg for 4 days in pts 65-75 years old and 0.13 mg/Kg in >75 years pts; prednisone 1.5 mg/Kg for 4 days) or CPR (lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days; cyclophosphamide orally 50 mg/day for 21 days in pts 65-75 years old and 50 mg every other day in >75 years pts; prednisone 25 mg every other day). After induction, pts were randomized to receive maintenance with lenalidomide alone (R; 10 mg/day for 21 days) or with prednisone (RP; R, 10 mg/day for 21 days and P, 25 mg every other day), until disease progression. Results : Pts characteristics were well balanced in all groups; 217 pts in Rd, 217 in MPR and 220 in CPR arms could be evaluated. After a median follow-up of 63.7 months, median PFS was 23.2 months in MPR, 18.9 months in CPR and 18.6 months in Rd (MPR vs CPR p=0.02; MPR vs Rd p=0.08). Median overall survival (OS) was 79.9 months in MPR, 69.4 months in CPR and 68.1 months in Rd (MPR vs CPR p=0.98; MPR vs Rd p=0.64). The most common grade ≥3 adverse event (AEs) was neutropenia: 64% in MPR, 29% in CPR and 25% in Rd pts (p<0.0001). Grade ≥3 non hematologic AEs were similar among arms. At the end of induction, 402 pts were eligible for maintenance, 198 in the RP and 204 in the R groups. PFS from start of maintenance was 22.2 months in the RP group and 17.6 in the R group, with 20% reduced the risk of death/progression for pts receiving RP maintenance (HR 0.81, p=0.07; Figure 1). A subgroup analysis was performed to determine the consistency of RP vs R treatment effect in different subgroups using interaction terms between treatment and cytogenetic abnormalities, ISS, age, sex, induction treatment and response before maintenance (Figure 1). No difference in OS was observed (HR 1.02, p=0.93) but the OS analysis was limited by the low number of events. Median duration of maintenance was 23.0 months in RP pts and 20.5 months in R pts, 14% and 13% of pts discontinued due to AEs, in RP and R groups, respectively. Conclusion : This phase III trial compared 2 different Lenalidomide-containing induction regimens and 2 different Lenalidomide-containing maintenance regimens in an elderly community-based NDMM population. MPR prolonged PFS by approximately 5 months, yet the higher incidence of hematologic toxicity should be carefully considered. The addition of low-dose prednisone to standard lenalidomide maintenance reduced the risk of death/progression by 20%, with a good safety profile. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Bringhen: Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Karyipharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Offidani: celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Musto: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Gaidano: Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. De Sabbata: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Palumbo: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hájek: Amgen, Takeda, BMS, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharma MAR: Consultancy, Honoraria. Boccadoro: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Crenolanib, a Type I FLT3 TKI, Can be Safely Combined with Cytarabine and Anthracycline Induction Chemotherapy and Results in High Response Rates in Patients with Newly Diagnosed FLT3 Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1071.1071 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1071-1071 ◽

Cited By ~ 31

Author(s):

Eunice S. Wang ◽

Richard M. Stone ◽

Martin S. Tallman ◽

Roland B. Walter ◽

John R. Eckardt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Chemotherapy ◽

High Dose ◽

Type I ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Monosomy 7 ◽

Full Count ◽

Count Recovery

Abstract Background: Crenolanib is a type I oral FLT3 TKI, which inhibits both FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD mutations (D835, N841, etc). Crenolanib has a half-life of 6-8 hours and does not accumulate with repeated dosing. Crenolanib does not inhibit c-kit at clinically achievable concentrations, potentially allowing for full count recovery even when combined with myelosuppressive chemotherapy. We report here the first analysis of a phase II trial evaluating the tolerability and efficacy of crenolanib combined with standard induction chemotherapy in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed FLT3 mutant AML. Methods: Pts (≥ 18yrs) (no upper age limit) with newly diagnosed AML characterized by FLT3 (ITD and/or TKD) mutations were enrolled. Pts received standard 7+3 induction with cytarabine 100 mg/m2/d for 7 days and either daunorubicin (<60yrs: 90 mg/m2; ≥60yrs: 60 mg/m2) or idarubicin 12 mg/m2 for 3 days. Crenolanib 100 mg TID was administered starting on day 9 until 72 hrs prior to next chemotherapy. Re-induction was permitted for pts with inadequate leukemia cytoreduction. Up to 4 courses of consolidation consisting of 6 doses of high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) (<60yrs: 3 g/m2; ≥60yrs: 1g/m2) was given, with crenolanib starting on day 7. Eligible pts could proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). Crenolanib maintenance therapy was offered for 1 year after HiDAC or -SCT. Safety and tolerability were assessed as well as anti-leukemic activity. Results: Demographics: Twenty-six pts (14 females, 12 males) with a median age of 55yrs (range 22-74yrs) have received 7+3 followed by crenolanib; nine (35%) pts were ≥ 60yrs. Five pts had initial WBC >100,000/μL (two pts had WBC >200,000). Three pts had AML following antecedent MDS or MPN. Mutational Analysis: Twenty-two pts had either FLT3-ITD (n=19) or FLT3-D835 (n=3) mutations. Genomic sequencing revealed multiple concurrent FLT3 activating mutations in four pts. One pt had a dual-activating kinase domain mutation in trans (D835Y+N841T). Three other pts had FLT3-ITD together with N841 (n=2), I836del (n=2), and V592/593 (n=2). Fifteen (60%) pts had FLT3 and NPM1 mutations, and 11 (52%) had FLT3 and DNMT3A mutations. Five pts (24%) had AML with three mutations (FLT3 + NPM1+ DNMT3A). WIT (WT1, IDH1/2, TET2) mutations were present in 11 (52%) pts. Three pts had trisomy 8; one pt each having monosomy 7, trisomy 4, and t(3;18)del(6q)der(3). Treatment Outcome: Eighteen (69%) pts received induction with cytarabine+daunorubicin (10 pts at 90 mg/m2, 8 pts at 60 mg/m2) and eight pts (31%) received cytarabine+idarubicin. To date, crenolanib has been well-tolerated in combination with chemotherapy. Six pts required crenolanib dose reductions for periorbital edema (n=2), delayed count recovery (n=1), LFT elevation (n=1), nausea (n=1) and rash (n=1). Out of the twenty-five pts evaluable for response, twenty-two (88%) achieved complete remission (CR) with full count recovery after one cycle of induction. Overall CR/CRi rate was 96% (Table 1). Sixteen pts (10 pts< 60yrs; 6 pts≥ 60yrs) have received a total of 26 cycles of consolidation with HiDAC and crenolanib. Twelve pts (46%) have been bridged to allogeneic SCT. With a median follow up of 6 months, only three pts (all > 60yrs) have relapsed. Overall survival is shown in Figure 1. Conclusion: Crenolanib, a type I pan-FLT3 TKI, can be safely combined at full doses with cytarabine/daunorubicin or cytarabine/idarubicin induction and HiDAC consolidation chemotherapy for upfront AML therapy. A high CR rate of 88% with full count recovery was observed after one cycle of induction with an overall CR/CRi rate of 96%. HiDAC consolidation and allo SCT could be administered on schedule. Encouraging anti-leukemic activity has been observed with no relapses in FLT3 mutant AML pts <60yrs. Accrual to this trial continues. Disclosures Stone: Roche: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Xenetic Biosciences: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celator: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ONO: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Eckardt:Arog: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Machine Learning Prediction for Complete Response to Hypomethylating Agents with or without Additional Agents in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130155 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1720-1720

Author(s):

Koji Sasaki ◽

Guillermo Montalban Bravo ◽

Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna ◽

Elias Jabbour ◽

Farhad Ravandi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Machine Learning ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Area Under The Curve ◽

Complete Response ◽

Learning Model ◽

Hypomethylating Agents ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Machine Learning Model

Background: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a heterogeneous malignant myeloid neoplasm of hematopoietic stem cells due to cytogenetic alterations and somatic mutations in genes (DNA methylation, DNA repair, chromatin regulation, RNA splicing, transcription regulation, and signal transduction). Hypomethylating agents (HMA) are the standard of care for MDS, and 40-60% of patients achieved response to HMA. However, the prediction for response is difficult due to the nature of heterogeneity and the context of clinical conditions such as the degree of cytopenias and the dependency on transfusion. Machine learning outperforms conventional statistical models for prediction in statistical competitions. Prediction with machine learning models may predict response in patients with MDS. The aim of this study is to develop a machine learning model for the prediction of complete response (CR) to HMA with or without additional therapeutic agents in patients with newly diagnosed MDS. Methods: From November 2012 to August 2017, we analyzed 435 patients with newly diagnosed MDS who received frontline therapy as follows; azacitidine (AZA) (3-day, 5-day, or 7-day) ± vorinostat ± ipilimumab ± nivolumab; decitabine (DAC) (3-day or 5-day) ± vorinostat; 5-day guadecitabine. Clinical variables, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of genetic mutations by next generation sequencing (NGS) were included for variable selection. The whole cohort was randomly divided into training/validation and test cohorts at an 8:2 ratio. The training/validation cohort was used for 4-fold cross validation. Hyperparameter optimization was performed with Stampede2, which was ranked as the 15th fastest supercomputer at Texas Advanced Computing Center in June 2018. A gradient boosting decision tree-based framework with the LightGBM Python module was used after hyperparameter tuning for the development of the machine learning model with training/validation cohorts. The performance of prediction was assessed with an independent test dataset with the area under the curve. Results: We identified 435 patients with newly diagnosed MDS who enrolled on clinical trials as follows: 33 patients, 5-day AZA; 23, 5-day AZA + vorinostat; 43, 3-day AZA; 20, 5-day AZA + ipilimumab; 19 patients, AZA + nivolumab; 7, AZA + ipilumumab + nivolumab; 114, 5-day DAC; 74, 3-day DAC; 4, DAC + vorinostat; 97, 5-day guadecitabine. In the whole cohort, the median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range, 13.0-90.3); 117 (27%) patients had a history of prior radiation or cytotoxic chemotherapy; the median white blood cell count was 2.9 (×109/L) (range, 0.5-102); median absolute neutrophil count, 1.1 (×109/L) (range, 0.0-55.1); median hemoglobin count, 9.5 (g/dL) (range, 4.7-15.4); median platelet count, 63 (×109/L) (range, 2-881); and median blasts in bone marrow, 8% (range, 0-20). Among 411 evaluable patients for the revised international prognostic scoring system, 15 (4%) had very low risk disease; 42 (10%), low risk; 68 (17%), intermediate risk; 124 (30%), high risk; and 162 (39%), very high risk. Overall, 153 patients (53%) achieved CR. Hyperparameter tuning identified the optimal hyperparameters with colsample by tree of 0.175, learning rate of 0.262, the maximal depth of 2, minimal data in leaf of 29, number of leaves of 11, alpha regularization of 0.010, lambda regularization of 2.085, and subsample of 0.639. On the test cohort with 87 patients, the machine learning model accurately predicted response in 65 patients (75%); 53 non-CR among 56 non-CR (95% accuracy); and 12 CR among 31 CR (39% accuracy). The trend of accuracy improvement by iteration (i.e., the number of decision trees) is shown in Figure 1. The area under the curve was 0.761521 in the test cohort. Conclusion: Our machine learning model with clinical, cytogenetic, and NGS data can predict CR to HMA in patients with newly diagnosed MDS. This approach can identify patients who may benefit from HMA therapy with and without additional agents for response, and can optimize the timing of allogeneic stem cell transplant. Disclosures Sasaki: Otsuka: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Jabbour:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding. Ravandi:Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding; Selvita: Research Funding; Menarini Ricerche: Research Funding; Macrogenix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kadia:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bioline RX: Research Funding; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Takahashi:Symbio Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. DiNardo:syros: Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; notable labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; medimmune: Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; daiichi sankyo: Honoraria. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immunogen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Mutations Highly Specific for Secondary AML Are Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with NPM1-Mutated ELN Favorable Risk AML

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150759 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 686-686

Author(s):

Onyee Chan ◽

Najla Al Ali ◽

Hammad Tashkandi ◽

Austin Ellis ◽

Somedeb Ball ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Secondary Aml ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background: NPM1 is commonly mutated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and represents a distinct entity under the WHO 2016 classification. It is one of the few mutations that can potentially support favorable risk by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 criteria. Mutations that are highly specific for secondary AML including SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, ZRSR2, ASXL1, EZH2, BCOR, and STAG2 (sMut) (Lindsley et al.) have been shown to confer poor prognosis. The impact of these mutations on NPM1-mutated AML warrants further investigation. Objective: In this study, we explore the outcomes in patients with NPM1-mutated AML. Methods: This was a retrospective study of NPM1-mutated AML patients who were diagnosed and treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center from 2013 to March 2021. Inclusion was restricted to NPM1-mutated patients with mutation analysis (NGS) performed at diagnosis (n=159). Kaplan-Meier, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Among 159 patients (78M/81F, median age 63 years at diagnosis), 80.5% had de novo AML. By ELN 2017 criteria, 63.5% (101/159) had favorable risk, 27.7% (44/159) had intermediate risk, and 8.2% (13/159) had adverse risk disease. Almost 90% had intermediate risk cytogenetics at the time of diagnosis. Common co-mutations included DNMT3A (47.2%), FLT3-ITD (35.8%), TET2 (26.4%), IDH1 (17.6%), FLT3-TKD (15.1%), and IDH2 (13.8%). sMut comprised 19.5% (31/159) of patients and 20.8% (21/101) of those with ELN favorable risk. In patients with treatment response data, those with sMut never achieved CR/CRi in 35.7% (10/28) compared to 17.2% (22/128) of patients without sMut (p=0.038). The overall survival (OS) was 43.7 months with a median follow up of 35.5 months. Patients with sMut had worse OS compared to those without sMut (14.7 months vs 57.6 months, p=0.011). Among patients with favorable risk disease, OS was 11.6 months compared to not reached for those with sMut and without sMut, respectively (p<0.0001). Univariate analysis showed sMut and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) significantly impacted OS (sMut: HR 3.48, 95% CI: 1.80-6.72, p<0.001; HCT: HR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07-0.44, p<0.001). Multivariate regression using covariates including age, AML type, sMut, and HCT confirmed their prognostic significance on survival (sMut: HR 2.40, 95% CI: 1.17-4.93, p=0.017; HCT: HR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.56, p=0.002). Conclusions: Our findings suggest NPM1-mutated AML patients with sMut have significantly worse prognosis despite being classified primarily as favorable risk by ELN 2017 at diagnosis. This may have treatment implications altering the need for and/or timing of HCT. These findings should be assessed prospectively and validated in independent datasets. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hussaini: Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celegene: Consultancy; Decibio: Consultancy; Guidepoint: Consultancy; Bluprint Medicine: Consultancy. Talati: AbbVie: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Kuykendall: Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Protagonist: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Blueprint: Honoraria; Pharmaessentia: Honoraria. Padron: Blueprint: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Stemline: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding. Sallman: Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sweet: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Consultancy; BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Acceleron: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet: AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Millenium Pharma/Takeda: Consultancy; BerGenBio: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Phase II Study Of The Combination Of MLN 9708 With Lenalidomide As Maintenance Therapy Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant In Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1983.1983 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1983-1983 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Veera Baladandayuthapani ◽

Donna M. Weber ◽

Sheeba K. Thomas ◽

Raymond Alexanian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Time To Progression ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background The role of lenalidomide for maintenance after myeloblative therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been established based on the CALBG 100104 and IFM 2005-02 experience. Continuous low dose lenalidomide demonstrated a significant benefit in progression free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP) in both trials and the CALBG trial also demonstrated a benefit in early overall survival. The benefit in PFS with lenalidomide is preserved in patients with high risk cytogenetics and in complete remission after ASCT. Proteaseome inhibitors (PI) have been studied after ASCT in a hybrid consolidation/maintenance model with a predefined course of bortezomib-based therapy, which was well tolerated and led to a significant improvement in response rates and in PFS. However long term proteasome inhibitor maintenance therapy has been limited by the route of administration. The combination of PIs and immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) have a strong preclinical rationale, and their activity has been confirmed with high response rates in various combinations in both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory myeloma. MLN9708, an oral PI, may be more convenient as an oral therapy to be studied in the maintenance setting. Here we report preliminary data from a pilot study of the combination of MLN9708 and lenalidomide as maintenance therapy post ASCT. Methods This is a single arm phase II study with the primary objective to establish the safety and efficacy (PFS) of MLN 9708 (Ixazomib) and lenalidomide in the maintenance setting post ASCT. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the incidence of secondary primary malignancy, the best response rate (sCR/nCR/VGPR/PR), time to progression and time to next therapy. Patients must have undergone ASCT with melphalan as a preparative regimen within 12 months of initiation of induction for newly diagnosed myeloma. Patients started maintenance therapy 60-180 days post ASCT. Treatment consisted of 28 day cycles of oral MLN9708 4 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and oral lenalidomide 10 mg daily on days 1-28 with a dose increase to 15 mg after 3 months if tolerating well. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4. Response was assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results A total of 16 patients have been enrolled with a median age of 60 years (range 51-74); 12/16 patients were male. 6 patients had ISS stage 1, 2 patients had stage II, 5 patients had stage III, and 3 had an unknown stage. 14 of the patients remain on trial, 2 patients have discontinued maintenance therapy. 1 patient with high risk disease, including del17p, del 13 discontinued due to rapidly progressive disease during cycle 2; 1 patient discontineud due to hospitalization for bilateral pneumonia. 3 patients had a treatment related SAE including 2 patients with PNA, 1 pt with G2 dehydration requiring hospitalization. 5 patients required a dose reduction in MLN9708 or lenalidomide due to G3/4 thrombocytopenia (n=2); dose delays for thrombocytopenia/neutropenia (n=3); one patient also had concurrent grade 3 rash. Hematologic toxicity included 3/16 patients with G3/4 thrombocytopenia, 9/16 with G1/2 thrombocytopenia, 5/16 patients with G3 neutropenia and 6/16 patients with G1/2 neutropenia. G3/4 drug-related non-hematologic AEs occurring in >1/16 of patients were limited to 2 patients with G3 creatinine elevation (in the setting of hospitalization for pneumonia). Additional non-hematologic G1/2 events included 9/16 patients with nausea, 5/16 with diarrhea, 9/16 with constipation, 4/16 with emesis, 6/16 patients with G1 rash; 1 pt with worsening of baseline G1 neuropathy. Conclusions The combination of MLN9708 and lenalidomide as maintenance therapy post ASCT for NDMM is a well-tolerated combination. 14/16 patients remain on study with only 1 patient discontinuing due to toxicity (pneumonia). The preliminary experience demonstrates the combination is safe, feasible and well tolerated with minimal toxicity and no unexpected toxicity. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: This abstract describes bortezomib + rituximab as 1st line induction therapy for patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Thomas:Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang:Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Orlowski:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Resverlogix: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

D.C.E.P. in Patients with Quad- or Penta-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117713 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2021-2021

Author(s):

Scott Goldsmith ◽

Mark A. Fiala ◽

Brandon B. Wang ◽

Mark A. Schroeder ◽

Tanya M. Wildes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Salvage Regimen ◽

Overall Response

Abstract Introduction: Despite the recent introduction of novel agents for multiple myeloma (MM), the disease remains incurable and invariably progresses through these new therapies. Patients with quad-refractory MM (refractory to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide) and penta-refractory MM (refractory to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody as well) are left with few treatment options and poor prognoses. The chemotherapy regimen of dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM. We and others employ DCEP as a salvage regimen, however, few outcomes data exist in this heavily pretreated population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to identify all patients who received DCEP for quad- or penta-refractory MM at our institution between 2013 and 2018. Disease response and refractoriness were defined by IMWG criteria. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) defined as PR or better. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR). Results: We identified 31 patients who received DCEP, 8 (26%) for quad-refractory and 23 (74%) for penta-refractory MM (Table 1). Twenty-eight (90%) had at least one autologous stem cell transplant, and one had a prior allogeneic transplant. Sixteen (52%) were female, 27 (87%) were white, and median age at DCEP was 60. Median number of prior treatment regimens was 8. All patients received dexamethasone (40mg/day), cyclophosphamide (400mg/m2/day), etoposide (40mg/m2/day), and cisplatin (10mg/m2/day) on days 1-4 (Lazzarino et al. 2001). Cycles were generally 28 days in length, but doses were delayed in cases of cytopenias or other toxicities. Dose reductions occurred in cases of renal impairment or prolonged cytopenias. Twenty patients (65%) received more than one cycle (range: 1-5). The overall response rate was 35%. One patient achieved CR allowing him to proceed to a second autologous transplant. One patient achieved a VGPR, 9 (29%) a PR. Four of the 8 (50%) quad-refractory patients responded compared to 7 of the 23 (30%) of the penta-refractory patients. Eleven (35%) were primary refractory to DCEP, and two patients died after one cycle prior to response assessment. The overall median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.5-3.8) and median OS was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.4-7.8). For responders, median DOR was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.0-5.4) and median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI 7.2-10.9). Conclusion: Quad- and penta-refractory MM carry a grim prognosis. In our retrospective study, DCEP led to a notable ORR of 35% (95% CI 19%-55%) in this very heavily-treated population, and suggests that it remains a reasonable salvage therapy. Furthermore, it supports prospective study of this regimen, possibly in combination or in comparison with other agents effective in quad- or penta-refractory MM. Disclosures Schroeder: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vij:Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Deep Molecular Response in Imatinib First-Line 418 Newly Diagnosed CP CML Patients.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113044 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3014-3014

Author(s):

Franck Emmanuel Nicolini ◽

Vincent Alcazer ◽

Pascale Cony-Makhoul ◽

Stephanie Dulucq ◽

Sandrine Hayette ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Deep Molecular Response ◽

Chi2 Test

Abstract Introduction Deep molecular response (DMR) are now highly desirable goals in the treatment of CP-CML, especially in the front-line setting, because it can lead to a definitive treatment-free remission (TFR). However, such a goal is difficult to attain and does not concern the majority of patients (pts), but currently the precise number of pts able to access to TFR is unknown. Aims We aim to determine the number or newly diagnosed CP-CML pts reaching DMR, stable DMR, and access to TFR, on Imatinib (IM, Glivec®) first-line. Methods We retrospectively analyzed in an observational study, a cohort of newly diagnosed CP-CML pts treated with IM first-line 400 mg daily alone in our 3 reference centers between 2000→2018. All pts were followed according to the ELN recommendations 2006, 2010 and 2013. Clinical data were extracted from medical files, and responses (hematologic, cytogenetic, molecular) were analysed according to standard methods. Molecular results were standardised according to the ELN/Eutos programs since 2003, and were all expressed as BCR-ABLIS in %. DMR have been defined according to the ELN (NCP. Cross et al., Leukemia 2015). Stability of DMR has been defined as a stable if ≥2 years at least on 4 datapoints. TFR has been proposed to pts presenting the only current recommended criteria: MR4.5 ≥2 years at least on 4 datapoints [(Rea et al., Cancer 2018)], in the 3 centers involved, within clinical trials, pioneered in our country, or now as a clinical routine recommendation. Loss of MMR was the trigger for TKI resumption after IM cessation for TFR. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), failure-free survival (FFS, defined as progression to advanced phases death, loss of CHR, CCyR, or MMR, discontinuation of IM for toxicity, primary cytogenetic resistance) were analysed since IM initiation in intention-to-treat. Results Four hundred and eighteen pts have been included in this study, with a median age of 60.7 (48-70) years at diagnosis, with 57% males and 43% females. Sokal score (n=401) was low in 32%, intermediate in 51% and high in 17%. ACA were present at diagnosis in 5.5% of the pts (NA in 1.44%). Major BCR transcripts were found in 98% of pts, and atypical transcripts in 1.9%. CHR was reached in a median of 1 (0.85 to 1.64) month of IM, <10% BCR-ABL transcript (IS) level at 3 months was found in 81% of the pts, and only 9.5% of pts were in MMR at 3 months. The median follow-up after IM initiation is 77.4 (0.9-231.5) months, 125 (30%) pts have switched to TKI2 for IM resistance or intolerance. Overall, 252 (60%) pts reached MR4, 127 (30%) stable MR4, 170 (41%) MR4.5, and 82 (20%) stable MR4.5. The median time on TKI necessary for obtaining stable MR4.5 is 15.6 (5.9-28) months. The cumulative incidence of MR4.5 at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months were 12.5%, 23.4%, 31.6%, 36.72%, 43.55%, 48.7%, 48.3%, 52.98%, 54.03%, 59.18% respectively (Figure 1A.). The cumulative incidence of stable MR4.5 at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months were 5.76%, 11.5%, 17.83%, 21.82%, 26.35%, 28.13%, 28.13%, 29.13%, 29.13%, 29.13% respectively (See figure 1B.). Seventeen (13%) and 10 (12%) pts have switched IM→TKI2 before obtaining a stable MR4 and a stable MR4.5 respectively. Overall, 41 (10%) pts have reached the TFR criteria and stopped their TKI and 23 (56%) never lost their MMR after cessation, with a median follow-up of 41.7 (9.4-121.8) months. In an univariate analysis, only gender (female vs male, 39% vs 61% for no MR4.5 and 53.66% vs 46.34% for stable MR4.5, p=0.028, Pearson's CHI2 test), and MMR at 3 months (yes vs no, 3.74% vs 96.26% for no MR4.5 and 17.46% vs 82.54% for stable MR4.5, p<0.001, Pearson's CHI2 test) were identified variables impacting on stable MR4.5. A multivariate analysis could not be performed on so few discriminant factors identified in the univariate analysis. Conclusions Only 42 out 418 (10%) of the newly diagnosed CP-CML pts on IM first-line in our study reach the TFR criteria we recommended, and only 22 over 418 pts (5%)will finally definitively stop any TKI durably within the limits of this retrospective observational study. Urgent strategies in order to increase the access to definitive TFR are needed. Disclosures Nicolini: Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy; Incyte Biosciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Cony-Makhoul:BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Other: Travels for attending to Congress; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Writing support, Travels for attending to Congress. Dulucq:BMS: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Hayette:Incyte: Consultancy. Mahon:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Etienne:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Treatment-Free Remissions in Newly Diagnosed CP CML Patients Treated with the Combination of Nilotinib + Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2a Versus Nilotinib Alone in the National Phase III Petals Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146412 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2553-2553

Author(s):

Franck E. Nicolini ◽

Gabriel Etienne ◽

Francoise Huguet ◽

Agnès Guerci-Bresler ◽

Aude Charbonnier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Statistical Difference ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Obstructive Sleep

Abstract Aims: Combining 2GTKI+pegylated IFN-a (Peg-IFN) represents an attractive approach for first-line treatment of CP CML, while providing somewhat light additional AEs, it induces high rates of deep molecular responses. We evaluated nilotinib (NIL) alone versus NIL+Peg-IFN in newly diagnosed CP-CML patients (pts) in a randomised phase III trial (PETALs, EudraCT 2013-004974-82) and analysed here the proportion of patients reaching Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) and outcome. Methods: Newly diagnosed CP CML pts ≤65 years, without vascular history were randomized 1:1 to get NIL 300 mg BID alone [M0 to M72 (unless TFR), arm A] vs Peg-IFN alone for 30 days (M-1→M0) 30 mg/wk, prior to NIL 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 30 mg/wk 2 wks, upgraded to 45 mg/wk thereafter, for up to 2 y (M0 to M24, arm B) followed by NIL alone until M72 unless TFR. The primary endpoint was the rate of MR4.5 by M12, and after amendment, the trial was extended to 72 months follow-up in order to add, as a secondary endpoint, the TFR rate in pts reaching MR4.5 ≥2 y. The trigger for treatment resumption was loss of MMR. All molecular assessments were centralised until M36, and in case of TFR, MR4.5 was centrally confirmed at M0 TFR, and further molecular follow-up was then performed locally. All molecular quantifications are expressed as BCR-ABL1/ABL1 (IS) in % with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control in the central lab and in the local labs all involved to the pluri-annual French external quality controls. Results are analysed in intention-to-treat. Results: As previously reported, 200 pts were randomized (99 in A, 101 in B), 130 M and 35 F in each arm, median age of 46 (18-66) y. The median follow-up (FU) since diagnosis is now 47.5 (33.77-62.39) Mo. and the median FU since discontinuation is 9.86 (5.8-23) Mo. in arm A and 15.57 (12.62-22.77) Mo. in arm B. Sokal and ELTS scores were high in 25% and 2.5%, intermediate in 33% and 16.5% and low in 42% and 81% pts respectively, equally balanced. All pts harboured a "Major" BCR transcript. We have previously shown that by M12, the rate of MR4.5 was 15.9% vs 21.5% (primary endpoint met, p=0.049) and that the overall cumulative incidence of MR4.5 was somewhat superior in arm B (54.6 [43.7-65.5] %) vs A (44 [31.5-54] %), p=0.05. Two pts died, one from myeloid blast crisis before TFR (arm A), one from a solid tumour (arm A). Overall, 40 pts (20%) reached the TFR criteria, 21 in arm A with a median FU of 9.86 (5.8-23) Mo. and 19 in arm B with a median FU since Nilo cessation of 15.57 (12.62-22.77) Mo, partly related to slightly different time for obtaining sustained MR4.5 in favour of arm B (16 vs 13 Mo.). For these 40 pts reaching TFR criteria, there was no statistical difference in terms of age at diagnosis and age at TFR, gender, Sokal, ELTS, FU since diagnosis, undetectability at cessation, BCR-ABL1 levels at 3 Mo. after cessation between the 2 arms. The survival without loss of MMR after cessation is illustrated in Figure 1. It looks superior in arm B over arm A, but did not reach statistical difference (p=0.445), but the FU is very short after cessation yet, especially in arm A. Once NIL was resumed in the pts that failed TFR, all pts recovered MMR within 6 Mo., with no difference between arms (p=1.00). In univariate analysis, we did not identify significant factor impacting on the TFR success (age at cessation, sex, undetectability at cessation, Sokal, ELTS) except the BCR-ABL1 value at M3-TFR (undetectable versus detectable, HR 7.15 [2.06-24.75], p=0.002), and the duration of MR4.5 before discontinuation (HR 1.11 [1.03-1.19], p=0.004). During this TFR phase 7 SAEs were reported in arm A (2 pregnancies, 1 obstructive sleep apnea, 1 fever episode, 1 carotid stenosis and 1 femoral stenosis in the same patient at 2 Mo. after cessation, 1 lung carcinoid tumor) and 2 in arm B (1 persistent atrial fibrillation, 1 cholecystectomy). Conclusions: The combination of NIL + Peg-IFN induces higher MR4.5 rates by M36 in newly diagnosed CP CML pts that may translate in higher successful TFR rates, however a longer follow-up is needed to see consistent significant differences. Updated data will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria. Etienne: Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Celgene: Other: Advisor; BMS: Other: Advisor; Amgen: Other: Advisor; Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Guerci-Bresler: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Charbonnier: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Deconinck: Stemline Therapetutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imunogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Travel Grants, Research Funding; Abbevie: Research Funding. Rea: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text