scholarly journals Prognostic Role of IL-6 in POEMS Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2700-2700
Author(s):  
Maryam Omar ◽  
Rahma M Warsame ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Francis K. Buadi ◽  
Ronald Go ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Poems Syndrome ◽  
Reference Ranges ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract INTRODUCTION POEMS syndrome is a paraneoplastic disorder that results in multi-organ disease, and Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is associated with disease activity. There is evidence that the cytokine Interleukin- 6 (IL-6) stimulates VEGF production in several cancer cell lines. It has also been suggested that patients with POEMS syndrome experience symptoms improvement when IL-6 levels are low. Our study aims to understand the role of IL-6 and whether it is a contributor to disease activity in POEMS syndrome. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of patients (pts) seen at Mayo Clinic within 1 year of diagnosis for POEMS syndrome with an IL-6 level within 3 months of diagnosis between 01/01/2011-05/31/2021 were included. Our database comprised 358 pts,7 were excluded because did not have official diagnosis of POEMS syndrome. Two hundred and ninety-nine pts did not have IL-6 testing within 90 days of diagnosis and were excluded. Clinical data was abstracted from our electronic medical record. Descriptive statistics were used for IL-6 levels. The majority of IL-6 laboratory testing for pts utilized the same reference range. A minority of pts had alternate reference ranges; thus, all IL-6 values and reference ranges were fold-corrected to have a unified reference to determine elevation in IL-6. High IL-6 was considered any value above the normal range, also analyzed pts in quartiles and deciles. Hematologic, VEGF and PET response criteria were utilized to group pts into responders or non-responders. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Differences between curves were by log rank. Statistical analysis was conducted via JMP software package (SAS, Cary, NC, USA). Univariate analysis was done to determine the prognostic value of IL-6. Statistical significance is considered with p-values <0.05. RESULTS 52 patients from among 352 met criteria and were included for analysis. Twenty-one patients (40%) had elevated IL-6 levels (IQR 5.67, 22.6) at the time of diagnosis. The fold elevation about normal was typically not very high, with a median of 3.1-fold elevation (IQR 1.3, 4.4; and range 1.0, 8.3). The percentage of males in the high IL-6 versus the normal Il-6 group were 90% versus 65%, p=0.03. Compared to normal IL-6, those with elevated IL-6 values had more instances of hepatomegaly (43% vs 16%, p=0.03), ascites (28% vs 6%, p=0 .04), abnormal DLCO (26% vs 3%, p=0.03), mixed bone lesions (57% vs 29%, p= 0.04), and lower serum albumin (range 2.3-3.5 vs 2.5-4.5 g/dL, p=0.0008).There was a trend for lower VEGF values among the high IL-6 group, but this did not meet statistical significance (median 250 vs 438 pg/mL). There was no significant difference in the time to progression between pts with high versus normal IL-6 levels (HR 1.36; p=0.456). Overall survival was significantly longer in pts with normal IL-6 compared to pts with high IL-6 levels (Median OS 67.4 vs 47.8 months, p=0.02). Forty-two pts were evaluated for VEGF response after treatment; there was a significant improvement in time to progression (85.5 vs 14.9 months, p=0.03) in pts who were VEGF responders. Among pts evaluable for a hematologic response (n=15), time to progression in pts with baseline high IL6 was longer in hematologic responders compared to non-responders (p=0.02). Conclusion Although OS was longer for pts with normal IL-6, elevated IL-6 at the time of diagnosis does not prevent pts from achieving disease remission. The study demonstrates that response to treatment rather than interleukin-6 levels in pts with POEMS syndrome is more prognostic. This study is an important initial step into understanding the utility of IL-6 in POEMS syndrome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gertz: Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Prothena: Consultancy; Aurora Biopharma: Other: Stock option; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie Inc, Celgene Corporation: Other: Data Safetly & Monitoring; Akcea Therapeutics, Ambry Genetics, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc (to Institution), Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria. Kumar: Oncopeptides: Consultancy; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tenebio: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Carsgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Dingli: GSK: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy. Lin: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sorrento: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding. Kapoor: Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Dispenzieri: Pfizer: Research Funding; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Alnylam: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Treatment Outcomes of Real Life Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients:Â Analysis from Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2019-2019
Author(s):  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Roman Hajek ◽  
Lucie Brozova ◽  
Ludek Pour ◽  
Ivan Spicka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Monoclonal Gammopathies

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma patients over the age of 65 represent the majority of myeloma population. The main goal was to evaluate treatment outcomes in terms of overall survival for elderly patients based on initial choice of anti-myeloma drugs, and to find potential factors affecting survival. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective registry based analysis from the Registry of monoclonal gammopathies of the Czech Myeloma Group. Patients with multiple myeloma diagnosed between 2007-2016 over the age of 65 with symptomatic myeloma were included in the analysis. Basic demographic data and disease characteristics were obtained. The Kaplan-Meier estimates were completed by the Greenwood confidence interval. The log-rank test was used to estimate the statistical significance of the difference between the curves. The Cox proportional hazards model was performed to explore the univariate significance of risk factors. Results: Data from 1410 MM patients were obtained. Gender [HR 1.316 (1.124-1.541), p=0.001], age [above 75 vs. 66-75, HR 1.437 (1.221-1.692), p< 0.001], creatinine levels [at cutoff 152 µmol/L, HR 1.613 (1.365-1.905), p< 0.001] and ECOG performance status [0-1 vs. 2-4, 1.869 (1.594-2.191), p< 0.001] were found to significantly affect overall survival. Moreover these risk factors have cumulative effect on overall survival of the patients. Overall survival of patients regardless to above mentioned risk factors treated with upfront bortezomib (N = 880) was median OS 40.4 months (CI: 36.1-44.7), patients treated with upfront thalidomide (N = 370) had median OS 48.1 months (CI: 41.0-55.2), for lenalidomide (N = 64) median overall survival was 53.2 months (CI: 44.6-61.8) and for combination of bortezomib and thalidomide (N = 46) 32.2 months (CI: 26.6-37.8). When any of these risk factors was present the OS in each group shortened. In the group of patients with no risk factors (N = 255) the median OS for bortezomib (N = 126) was not reached, for thalidomide (N = 96) the median OS was 66.3 months (CI: 43.1-89.6), for lenalidomide (N = 17) 71.1 months (CI: 44.8-97.4) and for combination of bortezomib and thalidomide (N=8) was not reached. In the group of patients with 1 risk factor (N = 514) the median OS for bortezomib (N = 303) was 46.1 months (CI: 36.2-56.1), for thalidomide (N = 141) 56.2 months (CI: 47.5-64.9), for lenalidomide (N = 29) 49.0 months (CI: 9.7-88.2) and for combination of bortezomib and thalidomide (N=20) was not reached. In the group of patients with 2 risk factors (N = 420) the median OS for bortezomib (N = 288) was 34.0 months (CI: 24.7-43.4), for thalidomide (N = 87) 31.9 months (CI: 22.8-40.9), for lenalidomide (N = 14) 33.2 months (CI: 0.0-67.6) and for combination of bortezomib and thalidomide (N=20) 29.4 months (CI: 7.6-51.1). In the group of patients with 3-4 risk factors (N = 221) the median OS for bortezomib (N = 163) was 19.2 months (CI: 14.9-23.5), for thalidomide (N = 46) 18.9 months (CI: 13.0-24.7), for lenalidomide (N = 4) 6.1 months (CI: 0.0-63.0) and for combination of bortezomib and thalidomide (N=3) 14.3 months (CI:-). Conclusion: The overall survival of patients above the age of 65 shows promising results with the use of novel agents. The treatment outcomes seem to be generally affected by overall condition, age and gender of the patient rather than treatment modality used upfront. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Hajek: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Maisnar:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Different Treatment Approaches to Blast Phase-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3641-3641
Author(s):  
Franco Castillo Tokumori ◽  
Najla Al Ali ◽  
Onyee Chan ◽  
David A. Sallman ◽  
Seongseok Yun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Blast Phase ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract CONTEXT: Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) occurs in 5-20% of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Overall survival in blast phase MPN (MPN-BP) is poor, usually in the range of 3 to 6 months, and is not significantly impacted by intensive chemotherapy. Current guidelines favor treatment with a hypomethylating agent (HMA), but survival remains poor, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) holds the only potential for long term survival. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics and overall survival of MPN-BP according to different treatment approaches. DESIGN: Single-institution, retrospective analysis of 70 MPN patients that progressed to blast phase, who presented to our institution between 2001 and 2020. Transformation to AML defined as &gt;20% myeloblasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. We stratified the patients according to initial treatment strategy for AML. Baseline variables were compared between groups. Median overall survival (mOS) was measured from time of AML diagnosis to date of death. Kaplan-Meier plots were created to compare mOS. RESULTS: Among 70 MF patients that progressed to AML, initial treatment was: 19 best supportive care (BSC), 25 HMA (20 HMA only and 5 HMA + venetoclax), and 26 intensive chemotherapy (IC) [12 patients received standard "7+3" regimen with daunorubicin/idarubicin and cytarabine, 12 received high-dose cytarabine, cladribine +/- mitoxantrone (CLAG/CLAG-M), and 2 received CPX-351 (Vyxeos)]. Patients receiving IC were younger at time of leukemic transformation than those receiving BSC (median 63.9 years vs 72.9 years; p=0.029) or HMA (median 63.9 years vs. 69.0 years; p=0.026). Additionally, 70% of IC patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 compared to just 48% of patients receiving either BSC or HMA (p=0.088). Median OS for the entire cohort (n = 70) was 4.8 months. Compared to patients who received active treatment with HMA or IC, those treated with BSC had shorter survival (0.9 months vs 6.4 months; p=0.001). Median survival between patients treated with HMA and IC was not significantly different (4.5 months vs 9.6 months; p=0.13). Patients treated with IC were more likely to proceed to AHSCT (46% vs 5%; p &lt; 0.001). Between HMA and IC groups, there was no difference in time from MPN-BP diagnosis to treatment (median 0.4 months vs 0.3 months; p=0.644) or total number of lines of treatment for MPN-BP. Focusing specifically on the role of AHSCT in patients treated with IC, we found that patients who received AHSCT had significantly longer mOS than those patients who did not (18.9 months vs 4.9 months; p=0.002), suggesting the beneficial role of intensive chemotherapy is critically tied to the ability to subsequently undergo AHSCT. Among patients who underwent AHSCT, 1-year and 2-year OS was 51% and 34%, respectively. In contrast, patients not receiving AHSCT had 1-year and 2-year OS of 14% and 2%, respectively. Independent of age, AHSCT (p=0.008) and receipt of therapy (p=0.017) significantly correlated with longer survival after AML diagnosis. Besides these factors, there were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics between the three groups. Acknowledging the limitations associated with small numbers, we did not note any difference in survival between patients who received HMA vs HMA + venetoclax (p=0.27). CONCLUSIONS: In MPN-BP, patients receiving treatment had superior outcomes to those that received BSC. Initial treatment with intensive chemotherapy was associated with non-significant improvement in survival; however, this appears to be critically linked to the receipt of AHSCT. In appropriate patients, intensive chemotherapy may be reasonable in an effort to provide an effective bridge to AHSCT. Still, this study reinforces the poor prognosis associated with MPN-BP and the desperate need for novel therapeutic approaches in this group of patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sallman: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Aprea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Sweet: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Padron: BMS: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Blueprint: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; Stemline: Honoraria. Lancet: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; Millenium Pharma/Takeda: Consultancy; BerGenBio: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Komrokji: PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuykendall: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Prelude: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; PharmaEssentia: Honoraria; CTI Biopharma: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BluePrint Medicines: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Protagonist: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Outcome with Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone Followed by Early Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation In the ECOG E4A03 Randomized Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 38-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Samuel diCapua Siegel ◽  
Susanna Jacobus ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Rafat Abonour ◽  
Natalie Scott Callander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
First Year ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 38 INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide and bortezomib have moved into the management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma leading to dramatically improved outcomes. As a consequence, the role of upfront autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (ASCT) has become more controversial. The ECOG E4A03 clinical trial randomized newly diagnosed MM patients to lenalidomide with high-dose dexamethasone (LD) vs lenalidomide with low-dose dexamethasone (Ld) (Rajkumar et al Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 29–37). Upon completing four cycles of therapy, pts had the option of ASCT or continuing on the assigned therapy. The purpose of this abstract is to determine the outcome of patients on this trial pursuing early ASCT according to various age-groups. MATERIALS and METHODS: This is a post hoc, retrospective analysis of overall survival within age subgroups stratified by early ASCT status. This is a landmark analysis including only pts surviving the first 4 cycles of therapy. RESULTS: In all three age-groups studied, 1, 2, and 3-year survival probability estimates with ASCT were excellent (Tables 1, 2, and 3). For patients under the age of 65 who survived the first 4 cycles of therapy, overall survival at 3-years was 94% with early ASCT, 78% in pts continuing protocol therapy. Although direct comparison with patients not going to early transplant is not possible because the assignment to early ASCT versus no early ASCT was not randomized, survival with ASCT at 3-years appeared higher. While we attempt to correct for age, the differences may be influenced by other factors such as performance status, comorbidities, response to therapy, etc. The presumption that treatment related mortality (TRM) should be more problematic for older pts undergoing ASCT is addressed by looking at the >65 and >70yo cohorts. In the >65 age group, one-year mortality is similar between the early ASCT population and the no early ASCT population. In the >70 age group, no adverse impact of early ASCT was seen in the first year on overall survival but the sample size is extremely small. In all age groups early ASCT seemed to mitigate some of the survival disadvantage associated with randomization to the LD arm. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that the strategy of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone induction followed by early ASCT has a remarkably good outcome in terms of overall survival in all age groups studied and supports the continued role of early consolidative ASCT in newly diagnosed patients. The risk of early mortality was notably low in the first year in all age groups. The risk of early mortality seems to increase at 2 years for the LD pts not choosing early ASCT and at 3 years for the Ld pts not choosing early ASCT. Selection bias makes it difficult to compare results for pts that chose early ASCT directly to the patients who did not receive early ASCT in this trial. As such, these results emphasize the need for randomized trials investigating the timing of ASCT in myeloma in the era of novel therapy. Disclosures: Siegel: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for front line therapy. Abonour:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Callander:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Fonseca:Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy; Onyx: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy. Vesole:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Long-Term Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) for Patients with POEMS Syndrome (Polyneuropathy, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, Monoclonal Protein, Skin Changes): A CIBMTR Analysis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 120-120
Author(s):  
Ankit Kansagra ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Raphael Fraser ◽  
Noel Estrada-Merly ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Rare Disease ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Poems Syndrome ◽  
Plasma Cell Dyscrasia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction POEMS syndrome is a rare disease associated with a plasma cell dyscrasia with limited information regarding the role of ASCT. Small single institution series have demonstrated deep and durable responses after ASCT along with neurological improvement. Despite these benefits, ASCT is thought to have higher treatment related morbidity and mortality, limiting its use. We describe the outcomes from an international multicenter database of patients with POEMS syndrome undergoing ASCT. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing ASCT for POEMS syndrome. Standard descriptive methods were used to report patient characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predicators for non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). NRM was compared between POEMS and multiple myeloma (MM) patients who underwent ASCT during the same time period. Results Between 2008-2018, 331 pts with POEMS syndrome who underwent ASCT were identified. The median age was 51 years, with 66% males. Racial distribution was 65% Caucasians, 19% African American, 5% other, and 10% missing. Pre-transplant characteristics included 70% patients had Karnofsky score &lt;90, and 50% had HCT-CI ≥ 3, reflecting underlying disease severity and symptoms. The most common comorbidity was pulmonary (52%). Only 14% of patients were in very good partial response or better at the time of ASCT and 72 (22%) patients underwent ASCT without prior treatment. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 7 months and 74% underwent ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis. The most common mobilization strategy was GCSF +/- plerixafor in 50% of pts and 87% of pts received conditioning with 200mg/m2 of Melphalan. The median follow up was 48 (range 3-137) months. At day 100, NRM was 0.9 % (95% CI: 0.2-2.2%). At 4 years, NRM was 4.9% (95% CI: 2.6-7.9%), relapse 15.4% (95% CI 11.3-20.1%), PFS 79.7% (95% CI 74.5-84.3%) and OS 92% (95% CI 89.2-95.6%). Subsequent neoplasms were seen in 16 (5%) with 4 myeloid malignancy and 12 solid tumors. On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 60 years was associated with greater hazards of mortality, HR 2.6 (95% CI 1.2-5.6), p 0.01. The figure shows the comparable NRM between POEMS and MM (p 0.31). Conclusions: We report outcomes of the largest ASCT series of POEMS patients. Despite a high HCT-CI and low functional status among patients with POEMS syndrome, no difference in NRM was seen when compared to MM. Post-transplant outcomes were excellent and support single center data on the role of ASCT in this rare disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kansagra: Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alynylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cota Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dispenzieri: Alnylam: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kumar: Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Carsgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tenebio: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Qazilbash: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Advisory Board; NexImmune: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Biolline: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Other: Advisory Board; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Shah: GSK: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Indapta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Nektar: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Teneobio: Research Funding; CareDx: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy. D'Souza: Sanofi, Takeda, Teneobio, CAELUM, Prothena: Research Funding; Imbrium, Pfizer, BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen, Prothena: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Increased Interleukin-8 (IL8)-CXCR2 Signaling Promotes Progression of Bone Marrow Fibrosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Andrew Dunbar ◽  
Min Lu ◽  
Mirko Farina ◽  
Young Park ◽  
Julie Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Introduction: Elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines are a hallmark feature of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-8 (IL8) is increased in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and correlates with adverse outcome, including overall survival. Previously, the Levine/Fang labs identified increased IL8 secretion from individual CD34+ stem cells in a subset of MF patients. The role of IL8 and its cognate receptors CXCR1/2 in MF pathogenesis has not been delineated. Methods: Single-cell cytokine assays were performed on isolated CD34+ cells from 60 clinically annotated MPN patients (20 MF, 20 PV, 20 ET) using a previously described micro-chip platform (Kleppe et al, Can Disc 2013). 10 healthy donors (CD34+ cells from hip replacements) were used as controls. Integrated RNA-Seq and Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin followed by next-generation sequencing (ATAC-Seq) was performed on CD34+ cells from MPN patients with and without expanded IL8 secreting clones for gene expression/chromatin accessibility analysis. To model the role of IL8-CXCR2 on fibrosis in vivo, the human MPLW515L transplant model (hMPLW515L) of MF was used. Specifically, wild-type (WT) murine bone marrow (Creneg-Cxcr2f/f; Cxcr2WT) or marrow lacking the CXCR2 receptor (VavCre-Cxcr2f/f; Cxcr2KO)were retrovirally infected with MSCV-hMPLW515L-IRES-GFP and transplanted into lethally irradiated WT recipient mice and monitored for disease. Blood counts, chimerism, and flow cytometry were assayed. Moribund mice were sacrificed and assayed for grade reticulin fibrosis and overall survival. Results: Single-cell cytokine assays confirmed an increased proportion of IL8-secreting CD34+ cells in MF patients (40%) in comparison to other MPN sub-types (10% PV/0% ET) (Figure 1A). MF patients with expanded IL8 secreting clones (defined as &gt;50% of total CD34+ cells) had increased leukocytosis (p&lt;0.0001), larger spleen sizes (p=0.0004), greater prevalence of constitutional symptoms (p=0.0084), and higher-grade reticulin fibrosis in marrow (Figure 1B) in comparison to MF patients without prevalent IL8 clones. IHC confirmed increased IL8 expression in marrow biopsies from 8/15 MF patients in comparison to 0/4 normal controls (Figure 1C), and high IL8 expression was also observed in MF splenic megakaryocytes (MKs) as well as in splenic stromal/endothelial cells not seen in normal spleen (Figure 1D). Integrated RNA-Seq/ATAC-Seq analysis of IL8-high MF patients confirmed up-regulation of IL8-CXCR2 signaling and enrichment in pro-inflammatory pathways (i.e TNFa, NFkB, etc) by GSEA, as well as increased expression/accessibility of pro-inflammatory genes S100A8 and S100A9-previously implicated in fibrosis development. Flow analysis of IL8-high MF CD34+ cells revealed enhanced surface expression of CXCR2 and its analog CXCR1, such that MF was characterized by increased IL8 ligand and receptor expression (Figure 1E) and coincided with enhanced NFkB pathway activity (Figure 1F). Consistent with this, colony forming assays of cultured MF CD34+ cells revealed enhanced colony output when cultured with IL8 compared to WT CD34+ cells-an effect ameliorated by co-treatment with the CXCR1/2 antagonist Reparixin (Figure 1G). In vivo, hMPLW515L adoptive transplant with Cxcr2KO hematopoietic donor cells demonstrated improved leukocytosis, thrombocytosis (Figure 2A) and splenomegaly in comparison to Cxcr2WT hMPLW515L recipient mice. Pathologic analysis revealed a reduction in reticulin fibrosis in bone marrow (Figure 2B) and spleen, translating into an improvement in overall survival (Figure 2C). Notably, a significant reduction in dysplastic MKs-a hallmark feature of MF-was also observed in Cxcr2KO hMPLW515L mice (Figure 2D) supporting a role for CXCR2 signaling in MK proliferation. Conclusion: IL8 secreting clones are associated with increased symptom severity and fibrosis grade in MF. Gene expression of MF CD34+ IL8 secreting clones shows up-regulation of inflammatory genes S100A8/A9, implicated in myofibroblast proliferation. Cxcr2 KO abrogates fibrosis formation and prolongs survival in the hMPLW515L model, and CXCR1/2 inhibition impairs colony forming capacity of MF CD34+ cells. These data suggest pharmacologic inhibition of this pathway should be investigated as potential therapy in MF and in PV/ET patients at high risk of fibrotic transformation. Disclosures Fan: IsoPlexis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company; Singleron Biotechnologies: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Levine:Morphosys: Consultancy; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Qiagen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria; Loxo: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy; Imago: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; C4 Therapeutics: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Isoplexis: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy. Hoffman:Protagonist: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dompe: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forbius: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Further Evolution of Metronomic Therapy Extended to 28 Days (Metro28) for Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2128-2128
Author(s):  
Xenofon Papanikolaou ◽  
Rashid Z Khan ◽  
Adam Rosenthal ◽  
Clyde Bailey ◽  
Yogesh Jethava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Metronomic Therapy

Abstract Despite the increasing availability of novel agents for RRMM, many patients run out of treatment options due to disease refractoriness and/or progressive toxicities, both hematological (cytopenia) and non-hematological (cachexia, asthenia, renal and cardiopulmonary).Patients who are refractory to both proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents (IMIDs) carry an ominous prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 9 months (Leukemia, Kumar 2013). We previously reported on the efficacy and toxicity profiles of a metronomically scheduled chemotherapy regimen administered over the course of 16 days (Haematologica, Papanikolaou 2014). Encouraged by the results of that treatment, we have since modified metronomic chemotherapy to cover a 28-day period (metro28). The regimen consisted largely of bortezomib 1.0mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 7, 10, 13,16,19, 22,25,28; along with dexamethasone 12mg on days 1-4, 7-10, 13-16, 19-22, 25-28; thalidomide 100mg days 1-28, continuous 28 day infusion of doxorubicin 1.0mg/m2 (0.5mg/m2 for Ejection Fraction <40%) and cis-platinum 1.0mg/m2 (0.5mg/m2 for creatinine >2mg/dL), with the addition of arsenic trioxide (ATO) at 0.1mg/kg on each day after bortezomib; and lately vincristine (VCR) at 0.07mg daily dose by continuous infusion for 28 days. Patient characteristics included age >65yr, 46%; female, 33%; cytogenetic abnormalities at any time prior to therapy (CA), 86%; Gene Expression Profile (GEP) 70-defined high risk, 44%. The median number of prior therapies was 8 (1-64), prior transplants, 83% (1, 2, >=3), 20%, 32%, 31%; prior exposure to novel agents including Carfilzomib/Pomalidomide was 81%. Thrombocytopenia prior to treatment was present in 75% including thrombocytopenia <50,000/uL in 15%. Clinical outcomes are depicted in Figure 1. At a median follow up of 8.1 months, the median number of metro 28 cycles administered was 1 (1-5), with 37% achieving a partial response and median OS not yet reached. Interestingly, the 6 month - partial response duration estimate for the patients achieving PR was 53% (Figure 1A), while the one year OS estimate for all patients receiving metro 28 was 59% (Figure 1B). Prognostic factors that held statistical significance in univariate analysis for overall survival were albumin <3.5 g/dl (HR 2.56, P=0.009), beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) ≥3.5 mg/L (HR 3.03, P=0.003), LDH≥ 190 U/L (HR 2.81, P=0.003), GEP-70 High Risk (HR 2.32, P=0.048), GEP-5 High Risk (HR 5.75, P<0.001) (Figure 1C) and GEP PR subgroup designation (HR 3.71, P=0.003). In multivariate analysis, albumin < 3.5 g/dL (HR 2.81, P=0.035), B2M≥ 3.5 mg/L (HR 3.4, P=0.017), GEP PR subgroup (HR 3.8, P=0.012), and GEP-5 High Risk (HR 8.58, P<0.001) (Figure 1C) achieved statistical significance. The majority of cycles administered in the patient population were done in the outpatient setting (81%), while secondary admissions due to regimen toxicity occurred in 36% of the cycles administered. Grade 3 & 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia within 3 months from the start of the metronomic treatment were evident in 64% and 78% respectively of the cases. Treatment related mortality was 2%, due to one instance each of grade 5 infection and cerebrovascular event. In conclusion 28 day metronomic therapy is a feasible treatment with acceptable toxicity and encouraging preliminary results both in terms of ORR and OS for RRMM. Table 1: Patient characteristics at start of Metro28 therapy Factor n/N (%) Age >= 65 yr 56/122 (46%) IgA Isotype 28/110 (25%) Female 40/122 (33%) White 108/122 (89%) Albumin < 3.5 g/dL 47/122 (39%) B2M >= 3.5 mg/L 46/93 (49%) B2M > 5.5 mg/L 26/93 (28%) CRP >= 8 mg/L 54/122 (44%) Creatinine >= 2 mg/dL 15/122 (12%) Hb < 10 g/dL 57/122 (47%) LDH >= 190 U/L 36/121 (30%) Platelet Count < 150 x 10^9/L 92/122 (75%) Cytogenetic abnormalities 105/122 (86%) CA within 1 year of therapy 84/121 (69%) CA within 90 days of therapy 65/119 (55%) New Kit GEP Sample 91/91 (100%) GEP 70 High Risk 40/91 (44%) GEP 5 High Risk 39/91 (43%) GEP CD-1 subgroup 5/91 (5%) GEP CD-2 subgroup 17/91 (19%) GEP HY subgroup 14/91 (15%) GEP LB subgroup 6/91 (7%) GEP MF subgroup 9/91 (10%) GEP MS subgroup 9/91 (10%) GEP PR subgroup 31/91 (34%) GEP proliferation index >= 10 28/91 (31%) GEP centrosome index >= 3 26/91 (29%) n/N (%): n- Number with factor, N- Number with valid data for factor ND: No valid observations for factor Figure 1A Figure 1A. Figure 1B Figure 1B. Figure 1C: OS by GEP5 Figure 1C:. OS by GEP5 Disclosures Zangari: Norvartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. van Rhee:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morgan:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Myeloma UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; International Myeloma Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; The Binding Site: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MMRF: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Multiple Myeloma R-ISS Prognostic Stratification System in Real Life Population

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3333-3333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Vladimír Maisnar ◽  
Ludek Pour ◽  
Zdenek Adam ◽  
Ivan Spicka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Revised prognostic scoring system R-ISS (standard ISS plus cytogenetic changes) has been introduced as a possible tool for evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma. This system is based on pooled data from various clinical trials but has not been validated in patients´ population outside the clinical trial setting. Aim: To evaluate clinical relevance of R-ISS in real life population of multiple myeloma patients. Methods: Registry of monoclonal gammopathies (RMG) was established in 2007 and has become one of the flagship projects of the Czech Myeloma Group. The registry collects prospective data from patients with myeloma and other gammopathies (https://trials.cba.muni.cz/trialdb2/interface_forms/login_rmg.asp). Registry is regularly monitored and data are validated by an external monitor. Data from registry were retrieved to identify patients in whom all above mentioned parameters were available. These patients were then stratified according to R-ISS and TTP and OS were calculated as primary endpoints. Results: 555 patients (260 females, 295 males, median age 66 years) with multiple myeloma who had full set of necessary data available were identified. Median follow-up of this cohort was 22.2 months. 97 17.5% (97/555) patients were R-ISS stage I, 55.7% 309/555 were R-ISS stage II and 26.8% (149/555) patients were R-ISS III. Median overall survival was not reached for stage I, 3.9 years for stage II and 2.5 years for stage III. The differences were statistically significant (p<0.001, log-rank test). Median time to progression was 3.3 years for stage I, 1.9 years for stage II and 1.3 years for stage III. The differences were statistically significant (p<0.001, log-rank test). Stage I versus II showed HR (95% CI): 2.84 (1.66-4.87), p<0.001 and stage I versus III HR (95% CI): 5.20 (2.99-9.03), p<0.001 for overall survival and HR (95% CI): 2.02 (1.37-2.96), p<0.001 and (95% CI): 2.49 (1.64-3.77), p< 0.001 for time to progression. Similar survival pattern can be seen in a subgroup of patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation, without autologous stem cell transplantation and the system provides valuable information even in a subgroup of patients who were never treated with novel agents. Figure 1 shows overall survival and figure 2 time to progression of the cohort. Conclusion: Revised ISS provides valuable information about the long term prognosis in a mixed cohort of real life multiple myeloma patients. This system enables to estimate the prognostic category of each specific patient in a horizon of several years ahead. Supported by PRVOUK P37. Table 1 Table 1. Figure 1 Overall survival for R-ISS stages Figure 1. Overall survival for R-ISS stages Figure 2 Time to progression for R-ISS stages Figure 2. Time to progression for R-ISS stages Disclosures Spicka: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Honoraria. Hájek:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Loss of TOSO Promotes Richter's Transformation of TCL1A Driven CLL

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 354-354
Author(s):  
Alexandra da Palma Guerreiro ◽  
Cornelia Dorweiler ◽  
Laurent Kintzelé ◽  
Dunja Baatout ◽  
Malte Huelsemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Germinal Center ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditional Knockout ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Richter’S Transformation ◽  
Richter's Transformation

Abstract Background: The immunoglobulin-like protein TOSO, which has been found to serve as Fc receptor for IgM (FcµR), was shown by us and others to be overexpressed on CLL cells and only weakly expressed on more aggressive B-NHL. However the functional role of TOSO on lymphomagenesis has not been explored so far. Methods: To determine the role of TOSO on lymphoma development, we took advantage of the Eµ-TCL1 transgenic mice, which usually end up with an aggressive (IgVH unmutated) CLL-like phenotype. We generated a novel B cell-specific conditional knockout (KO) mouse model in which EµTCL1 mice (TC or control in the following) were crossbred with TOSO-floxed mice, expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the CD19 promoter (EµTCL1;Tosofl/fl;Cd19cre/wtor TCT in the following). TCT mice were further compared with p53 conditional knockout (EµTCL1;Tp53fl/fl;Cd19cre/wt or TCP). Results: In this study, we compared kinetics, overall survival and phenotype of lymphoma/CLL in TC, TCT and TCP mice. Interestingly, TCTmice developed a very aggressive phenotype and resulted in significantly shorter overall survival compared to TC mice (TCT 274 days vs. TC 346 days; p<0.0001). As expected, mice lacking p53 (TCP) died even more rapidly than TCT mice (median survival: TCP 233 days). Initially, all three genotypes (TC, TCT, TCP) developed a CLL phenotype, exhibiting a CD19 and CD5 positive malignant clone. In the TCT mice, shorter overall survival is accompanied by a stronger increase of blood leukocytes. Flow cytometry analysis confirmed a strong increase of leukemic CD19/CD5-positive B cells in the blood of TCT mice. With only 20 weeks of age, leukemic cells already made up 37.5 % (SD ± 15.47; n=14) of lymphocytes (TC: 14.3 % SD ± 9.81; n=31). At the age of 36 weeks, TCT mice showed even a 3.6-fold elevated malignant cell count compared to control mice (n=35 TC, n=14 TCT; p=0.006). All TCT mice developed a splenomegaly, with spleen weight (p=0.01) and size (p=0.018) significantly increased in 36 week old TCT mice (n=7) compared to TC mice (n=7) and comparable to those from TCP mice. Interestingly, between week 28 and 36, we could observe that most of the TCT mice start losing CD19+ cells in the blood in contrast to TC and TCP mice. Immunohistochemistry revealed the expansion of malignant cells with pleomorphic nuclei and abundant cytoplasm in the spleen and bone marrow, as we know it from Richter`s transformation. To understand the rapid development of leukemia in TCT mice, we first determined the role of the BCR in this model. Interestingly, flow cytometry revealed a higher surface IgM expression (MFI: TCT 9,27; TC 2,05). In addition, in vitro assays revealed a significantly higher resistance of TCT cells towards PI3K inhibition (Idelalisib and Duvelisib) compared to TC cells. To further rule out the role of TOSO under "germinal-center conditions", we stimulated primary human CLL cells with CD40L expressing feeder cells and IL-4. Interestingly, both stimuli (either alone or in combination) resulted in almost complete loss of TOSO on CLL cells. Moreover, we uncovered, that the TOSO promoter is counteractively regulated by NF-κB and BCL6. Furthermore, our data illustrate that DNA hypomethylation of the TOSO promoter is a discriminating characteristic in CLL patients compared to healthy donors, thus explaining the significantly enhanced expression levels. Thus, both, epigenetic regulation and altered NF-κB/ BCL6 expression are critical pathogenetic steps in the development of CLL and aggressive B-NHL by regulating TOSO expression. Conclusion: The transformation of CLL into more aggressive malignancies is still not fully understood. Our data reveal that the loss of TOSO might play a major role in Richter's transformation by upregulation of the BCR and by mimicking the germinal-center phenotype. Disclosures Fingerle-Rowson: Roche: Employment. Wendtner:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Morphosys: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hallek:GSK: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Unexpected Toxicities When Nivolumab Was Given after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1956-1956
Author(s):  
Amy Wang ◽  
Justin Kline ◽  
Wendy Stock ◽  
Satyajit Kosuri ◽  
Andrew S. Artz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Relapsed Disease

Background:Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We hypothesized that checkpoint inhibitors may offer a novel approach for maintaining remission after allo-SCT. Data from pre-clinical studies have suggested a potential role for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Zhang et al., Blood 2009), so it is possible that immunomodulation with checkpoint inhibitors could stimulate the donor anti-leukemia immune response and prevent disease relapse. However, the safety of checkpoint blockade early after allografting remains to be established. Methods:We conducted a pilot study to assess the tolerability and efficacy of Nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, as maintenance therapy after allo-SCT (NCT02985554). Pts were eligible if they were post allo-SCT without evidence of relapse or active graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) or history of prior greater than stage I skin acute GVHD. Nivolumab was to be administered intravenously at 1mg/kg every 2 weeks for 4 doses followed by dosing every 12 weeks. Treatment started 4 weeks after routine immunosuppression was discontinued until 2 years after the transplant. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability of Nivolumab on this schedule. Secondary objectives were evaluation of adverse events, relapse, and overall survival. Results:Four pts were enrolled from December 2017 through November 2018. (Table 1)All pts experienced immune-related adverse events (irAE) from Nivolumab, and 2 (50%) pts experienced serious adverse events. (Table 2)One pt developed grade (G) 4 neutropenia soon after the first dose. (Figure 1)The absolute neutrophil count nadired at 20 cells/µL, at which point pegfilgrastim was administered. An interim bone marrow biopsy (BMBx) confirmed no evidence of relapsed disease. Full neutrophil recovery occurred approximately 3 months after the initial dose, and no subsequent toxicities occurred. Another pt developed G3 autoimmune encephalopathy concurrently with G2 transaminitis and G2 thrombocytopenia after one dose of Nivolumab. (Figure 2)Intravenous methylprednisolone (1mg/kg daily for 3 days) and immunoglobulin (2g/kg in 4 divided doses) were administered, followed by a 7-week steroid taper with full resolution of symptoms. Relapsed disease was ruled out by a BMBx. A third pt developed G2 skin rash approximately 10 days after the first dose of Nivolumab. Skin biopsy demonstrated drug hypersensitivity reaction vs GVHD, and the pt was treated with a 3-week prednisone course (starting at 1mg/kg followed by a taper). A mild flare recurred 2 weeks later, which was treated with topical steroids only. However, Nivolumab was not resumed. The fourth pt developed G2 elevated TSH approximately 2 months into therapy and after 4 doses of Nivolumab. Thyroid hormone replacement was initiated with subsequent symptom improvement and normalization of TSH over a 4-month period. As a result of these unexpected severe toxicities, the study was closed to further enrollment, and further Nivolumab administration ceased. Thus far, one pt (#1) relapsed after a total remission duration of 530 days; the remission duration after starting Nivolumab was 318 days. One pt has mild chronic skin GVHD. All 4 patients remain alive with a median overall survival of 2.3 years (range, 1.9-4.7). Conclusions:Even at low doses, the use of Nivolumab as maintenance therapy in the post allo-SCT setting was not tolerable at the current dosing and schedule due to an unexpected number of high grade irAEs. Additional studies of dose and timing after allo-SCT are needed to improve safety and tolerability, in conjunction with correlative studies to better understand the immunomodulatory processes in the post-transplant setting. Disclosures Kline: Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Stock:Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Artz:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Larson:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Contracts for clinical trials; Celgene: Consultancy. Riedell:Novartis: Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bishop:CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liu:Arog: Other: PI of clinical trial; BMS: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Novartis: Other: PI of clinical trial; Karyopharm: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab used as maintenance therapy in the post-transplant setting

scholarly journals Role of Remission Status and Prior Transplant in Optimizing Survival Outcomes Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Transplantation (HSCT) in Patients Who Received Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (INO) for Relapsed / Refractory (R/R) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 886-886
Author(s):  
Partow Kebriaei ◽  
Matthias Stelljes ◽  
Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Survival Probability ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Attaining complete remission (CR) prior to HSCT is associated with better outcomes post-HSCT. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, has shown significantly higher remission rates (CR/CRi and MRD negativity) compared with standard chemotherapy (SC) in patients (pts) with R/R ALL (Kantarjian et al. N Engl J Med. 2016). Pts treated with INO were more likely to proceed to HSCT than SC, which allowed for a higher 2-yr probability of overall survival (OS) than patients receiving SC (39% vs 29%). We investigated the role of prior transplant and proceeding directly to HSCT after attaining remission from INO administration as potential factors in determining post-HSCT survival to inform when best to use INO in R/R ALL patients. Methods: The analysis population consisted of R/R ALL pts who were enrolled and treated with INO and proceeded to allogeneic HSCT as part of two clinical trials: Study 1010 is a Phase 1/2 trial (NCT01363297), while Study 1022 is the pivotal randomized Phase 3 (NCT01564784) trial. Full details of methods for both studies have been previously published (DeAngelo et al. Blood Adv. 2017). All reference to OS pertains to post-HSCT survival defined as time from HSCT to death from any cause. Results: As of March 2016, out of 236 pts administered INO in the two studies (Study 1010, n=72; Study 1022, n=164), 101 (43%) proceeded to allogeneic HSCT and were included in this analysis. Median age was 37 y (range 20-71) with 55% males. The majority of pts received INO as first salvage treatment (62%) and 85% had no prior SCT. Most pts received matched HSCTs (related = 25%; unrelated = 45%) with peripheral blood as the predominant cell source (62%). The conditioning regimens were mainly myeloablative regimens (60%) and predominantly TBI-based (62%). Dual alkylators were used in 13% of pts, while thiotepa was used in 8%. The Figure shows post-transplant survival in the different INO populations: The median OS post-HSCT for all pts (n=101) who received INO and proceeded to HSCT was 9.2 mos with a 2-yr survival probability of 41% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31-51%). In patients with first HSCT (n=86) the median OS post-HSCT was 11.8 mos with a 2-yr survival probability of 46% (95% CI 35-56%). Of note, some patients lost CR while waiting for HSCT and had to receive additional treatments before proceeding to HSCT (n=28). Those pts who went directly to first HSCT after attaining remission with no intervening additional treatment (n=73) fared best, with median OS post-HSCT not reached with a 2-yr survival probability of 51% (95% CI 39-62%). In the latter group, 59/73 (80%) attained MRD negativity, and 49/73 (67%) were in first salvage therapy. Of note, the post-HSCT 100-day survival probability was similar among the 3 groups, as shown in the Table. Multivariate analyses using Cox regression modelling confirmed that MRD negativity during INO treatment and no prior HSCT were associated with lower risk of mortality post-HSCT. Other prognostic factors associated with worse OS included older age, higher baseline LDH, higher last bilirubin measurement prior to HSCT, and use of thiotepa. Veno-occlusive disease post-transplant was noted in 19 of the 101 pts who received INO. Conclusion: Administration of INO in R/R ALL pts followed with allogeneic HSCT provided the best long-term survival benefit among those who went directly to HSCT after attaining remission and had no prior HSCT. Disclosures DeAngelo: Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immunogen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian: Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Delta-Fly Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Advani: Takeda/ Millenium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Merchant: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stock: Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Loberiza: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vandendries: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Marks: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document