scholarly journals Real-World Effectiveness of Damoctocog Alfa Pegol in the Subgroup of Adolescent Hemophilia A Patients Aged 12-18 Years in the ATHNdataset

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4241-4241
Author(s):  
Martin Chandler ◽  
Michael Recht ◽  
Chunla He ◽  
Thomas Moulton ◽  
Lena Charafi
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Group 13 ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Moderate Disease ◽  
Adolescent Patients ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: The ATHNdataset is a HIPAA-compliant, de-identified database, sponsored by the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network. Over 40,000 people with a bleeding or clotting disorder followed at United States hemophilia treatment centers (HTC) have submitted health information, including 15,747 hemophilia A patients. Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of damoctocog alfa pegol (BAY 94-9027/Jivi®) to treat hemophilia A adolescent patients aged between 12-18 years in a real-world setting. Methods: The ATHNdataset was queried for people with hemophilia A aged ≥12 years of age treated with damoctocog alfa pegol. From this dataset adolescent patients aged between 12-18 years, treated either prophylactically or on-demand were identified. Collected data included baseline demographic data, treatment history, comorbidities and bleeding rates. The data were captured via patient chart review and entered into the database. The database was queried for patient data between January 1, 2010 and October 31, 2020. Results: At the data cutoff, 16 patients aged between 12-18 years were being treated with damoctocog alfa pegol. In this group, 13 patients (81%) had severe hemophilia A and 3 patients (19%) had mild/moderate disease. The majority of patients were male - 14/16 (87.5%) with 2/16 (12.5%) being female and the mean age of patients was 15.9 years old (median = 15.8). Of the total, 4 patients (25%) had a history of inhibitors. Patients had an average of 1.2 years of therapy with damoctocog alfa pegol and most (56%) had over 12 months of treatment. All the patients included in this analysis had documented bleeding rates in the ATHN system (Table 1). Mean total annualized bleed rate (ABR) was 0.05. Mean joint ABR and spontaneous ABR were zero. In the subgroup of patients who were on prophylaxis with damoctocog alfa pegol (n = 13), the mean total ABR, joint ABR and spontaneous ABR were zero. The proportion of patients with zero total bleeds during the entire observational period was 15/16 (94%) in the overall cohort and 13/13 (100%) in adolescent patients who were on prophylaxis. The majority of patients who were on prophylaxis 9/13 (69%) were treated twice-weekly with the mean weekly dose of 77.2 IU/kg/wk. Conclusions: The data from this analysis show that damoctocog alfa pegol provides protection from bleeding events in adolescent patients aged 12-18 years in the real-world setting. Mean ABR was low in this patient population, with 94% of patients experiencing zero bleeds. This data should be interpreted with caution due to limitations in real-world studies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Recht: American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network: Current Employment; Oregon Health & Science University: Current Employment; Foundation for Women and Girls with Blood Disorders, Partners in Bleeding Disorders: Speakers Bureau; uniQure: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Kedrion: Consultancy; Hema Biologics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy. He: ATHN: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Moulton: Bayer: Current Employment. Charafi: Bayer: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Straightforward Transition to Bay 81-8973 Prophylaxis in Patients with Hemophilia A: Prospective Real-World Data from the Taurus Non-Interventional Study Show That Number of Infusions per Week Is Maintained or Reduced

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5045-5045
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Beng Fuh ◽  
Philip Maes ◽  
Maria Eva Mingot-Castellano ◽  
Rubén Berrueco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
World Data ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Dosing Frequency

Abstract BACKGROUND: BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry®, Bayer) is an unmodified full-length recombinant FVIII indicated for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds in patients with hemophilia A; BAY 81-8973 was launched in 2016 and has since accumulated 6765 patient-years of exposure. The TAURUS study (NCT02830477) was established to investigate BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis dosing regimens chosen in clinical practice and confirm the established safety and efficacy results from the LEOPOLD clinical trials in a real world setting. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the proportion of patients on specific BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis regimens, bleeds, and patient-reported outcomes at baseline and most recent follow-up. METHODS: TAURUS is an international, open label, prospective, non-interventional, single arm study with a target recruitment of 350 previously treated patients with hemophilia A of all ages with moderate or severe hemophilia A (≤ 5% FVIII:C) with ≥ 50 exposure days to any FVIII product who have been switched to prophylaxis with BAY 81-8973. At baseline, physicians document clinical information including age, BMI, severity of hemophilia, number of target joints, prior treatment regimen, bleed history, inhibitor history, and reason for choosing a specific prophylaxis regimen. Patients/caregivers reported bleeds in ongoing patient diaries, and completed questionnaires on treatment satisfaction (HEMOSAT) and adherence (VERITAS-PRO) at baseline and follow-up. A scheduled interim analysis (30% of patients recruited) was conducted with data collected up to 2 July 2018. RESULTS: At the cut-off, 160 enrolled patients were included in the baseline analysis set, of whom 89 had ≥ 6 months of follow-up data available (median observation period 201 days), 33% of whom had completed one year of the study. Median (range) patient age was 22 (2‒69) years, time since diagnosis was 15 (0.5‒64) years, and most patients (76/89, 85%) had baseline FVIII level of <1%. Treatment assignments are shown in the table. All patients had received pre-study prophylaxis, for a median of 15 years, with 66% of patients using rFVIII-FS as their most recent FVIII treatment prior to BAY 81-8973. Most (91%) had been treated with BAY 81-8973 for <3 months prior to study entry. Pre-study, 72% of patients were treated ≥3 times per week (xW). At baseline, most patients (59%) were assigned treatment ≥3xW (every day, 1%; every other day, 16%; 3xW, 41%). The majority remained on their previous regimen (78% on ≤2xW and 97% on ≥3xW); any changes were mainly a reduction in frequency on BAY 81-8973 vs previous treatment (22%), with only 2% increasing frequency on BAY 81-8973. At last follow up, most patients remained on the same regimen: 60% on ≥3xW (≥ every other day, 17%; 3xW, 42%). Most patients (92%) did not alter their dosing frequency. Of the 8% who changed dosing frequency, the majority (6 patients) changed from ≥3xW to ≤2xW; 1 patient changed from ≤2xW to ≥3xW. The median prescribed weekly dose was 52 IU/kg (64 IU/kg for ≥3xW and 43 IU/kg for ≤2xW) on study, slightly lower than those with previous product: 56 IU/Kg overall, 64 IU/kg for ≥3xW and 50 IU/kg for ≤2xW. Median (Q1; Q3) patient diary-reported annualized joint bleed rates were 1.5 (0.0; 5.3), 1.2 (0.0; 5.3) and 1.4 (0.0; 6.1); for ≤2xW, ≥3xW, and all patients, respectively. HEMO-SAT and VERITAS-PRO data will be presented in the poster. No recruited patients developed inhibitors with BAY 81-8973. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world data from 89 patients show that the range of dosing options available for BAY 81-8973 allowed the majority of patients to become established quickly on this treatment upon switching. In the few instances where patients changed dosing frequency either upon switching to BAY 81-8973 or once established on treatment, most moved to less frequent treatment. Joint bleeding rates confirm and extend findings from the clinical trials and speak to effective bleeding prophylaxis with BAY 81-8973 in a real-world setting. Therefore, BAY 81-8973 treatment may be successfully individualized according to patient need and disease characteristics. Disclosures Wang: Terumo BCT: Other: CPC Clinical Research; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Bayer, Bioverative, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Shire, Genentech, Biomarain, Pfizer, CSL Behring, HEMA Biologics, Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Genentech, HEMA Biologics, Shire, CSL Behring: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy. Maes:Bayer: Honoraria. Rauchensteiner:Bayer: Employment.

Baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a European real-world, non-interventional registry study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
U Zeymer ◽  
L.H Lund ◽  
V Barrios ◽  
C Fonseca ◽  
A.L Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Real World ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is a major medical and economic burden that is often managed in office based practices. Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) was introduced as novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of HF. The ARIADNE registry aims to provide information on how outpatients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are managed in Europe, in light of this novel treatment option. Methods ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF treated by office-based cardiologists (OBC) or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists; PCP) in a real world setting. HFrEF patients were included prospectively, independently of whether treatment had been changed recently or not. 9069 patients were recruited from 687 centres in 17 European countries. Results The mean age of all patients was 68.1 years (S/V: 67.3 years, Non-S/V: 68.9 years). The majority of patients were in NYHA class II (61.3%), or NYHA class III (37.1%) overall, while more patients in the S/V group showed NYHA class III (S/V: 42.8%, Non-S/V: 30.9%). Mean LVEF was slightly lower in the S/V group than in the Non-S/V group (S/V: 32.7%, Non-S/V: 35.4%, overall 34.0%). The most frequently observed signs of HF were dyspnoea upon effort, followed by fatigue, palpitations on exertion at baseline. More patients tend to have more severe symptoms in the S/V groups (e.g. for dyspnoea on effort, Non-S/V: moderate 40.8%, severe 8.6%; S/V: moderate 46.4%, severe 14.1%). 44.0% of patients from the S/V group and 39.3% of non-S/V patients reported at least one hospitalization within 12 months prior to baseline, of which 73.3% in S/V and 69.9% in non-S/V patients were due to HF., At baseline, 44.7% of the patients used a CV device, of which most were implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD: Non-S/V 54.2%, S/V: 52.8%), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-ICD:Non-S/V 21.9%, S/V: 27.0%), and pacemaker (Non-S/V: 13.4%, S/V: 10.5%). The mean KCCQ overall summary score was 62.6 in the S/V group and 69.5 in the Non-S/V group at baseline. 83.9% of patients were treated with ARB or ACEi in Non-S/V group, (ACEi 57.3%, ARB 26.9%). The most frequently taken drug combinations in either group were ACEi/ ARB or S/V with β -blockers (Non-S/V 69.3%, S/V 67.3%). 40.2% in the Non-S/V group and 42.9% in S/V groups used a combination of ACEi/ARB or S/V, β-blocker and MRA. Conclusions The ARIADNE prospective registry provides insights and reflects variations in HF treatment practices in outpatients in Europe and the way S/V was introduced by OBCs and specialized PCPs in a real-world setting. In the observed population, S/V is more often prescribed to slightly younger patients with slightly lower LVEF, there was a greater observed percentage of S/V patients NYHA class III, with lower quality of life measurements and with more severe symptoms and recent hospitalizations for heart failure. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG

scholarly journals Real-World Clinical Outcomes Associated with Canagliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain: The Real-Wecan Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2275
Author(s):  
Juan J. Gorgojo-Martínez ◽  
Manuel A. Gargallo-Fernández ◽  
Alba Galdón Sanz-Pastor ◽  
Teresa Antón-Bravo ◽  
Miguel Brito-Sanfiel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Real World ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Baseline Hba1c ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Antihyperglycemic Therapy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Hba1c Levels

The aims of this multicentric retrospective study were to assess in a real-world setting the effectiveness and safety of canagliflozin 100 mg/d (CANA100) as an add-on to the background antihyperglycemic therapy, and to evaluate the intensification of prior sodium–glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) therapy by switching to canagliflozin 300 mg/d (CANA300) in patients with T2DM. One cohort of SGLT2i-naïve patients with T2DM who were initiated on CANA100 and a second cohort of patients with prior background SGLT-2i therapy who switched to CANA300 were included in the study. The primary outcome of the study was the mean change in HbA1c over the follow-up time. In total, 583 patients were included—279 in the cohort of CANA100 (HbA1c 8.05%, weight 94.9 kg) and 304 in the cohort of CANA300 (HbA1c 7.51%, weight 92.0 kg). Median follow-up periods in both cohorts were 9.1 and 15.4 months respectively. CANA100 was associated to significant reductions in HbA1c (−0.90%) and weight (−4.1 kg) at the end of the follow-up. In those patients with baseline HbA1c > 8% (mean 9.25%), CANA100 lowered HbA1c levels by 1.51%. In the second cohort, patients switching to CANA300 experienced a significant decrease in HbA1c (−0.35%) and weight (−2.1 kg). In those patients with baseline HbA1c > 8% (mean 8.94%), CANA300 lowered HbA1c levels by 1.12%. There were significant improvements in blood pressure in both cohorts. No unexpected adverse events were reported. In summary, CANA100 (as an add-on therapy) and CANA300 (switching from prior SGLT-2i therapy) significantly improved several cardiometabolic parameters in patients with T2DM.

scholarly journals Acute Mechanical Performance of Magmaris vs. DESolve Bioresorbable Scaffolds in a Real-World Scenario

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niklas F. Boeder ◽  
Oliver Dörr ◽  
Tim Koepp ◽  
Florian Blachutzik ◽  
Stephan Achenbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Eccentricity Index ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Vascular Scaffold ◽  
High Adverse Event ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Absorb Bvs ◽  
Event Rates ◽  
Minimal Area

Background: After the bioresorbable PLLA-based vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) was taken from the market due to its high adverse event rates, a magnesium-based scaffold (Magmaris) was introduced.Objective: To compare the acute performance of the sirolimus-eluting magnesium alloy Magmaris scaffold with that of the novolimus-eluting PLLA-based DESolve scaffold in terms of appropriate scaffold deployment using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Methods and Results: Data from the final OCT pullback of 98 patients were included (19 Magmaris, 79 DESolve) and analyzed at 1-mm intervals. The following indices were calculated: mean and minimal area, residual area stenosis, incomplete strut apposition, tissue prolapse, eccentricity index, symmetry index, strut fracture, and edge dissection. OCT showed a minimum lumen area for Magmaris vs. DESolve of 6.6 ± 1.6 vs. 6.0 ± 1.9 (p = 0.06). Scaffolds with residual area stenosis &gt;20% were predominantly seen in the DESolve group (15.8 vs. 46.8%; p = 0.01). The mean eccentricity index did differ significantly (0.74 ± 0.06 vs. 0.63 ± 0.09; p &lt; 0.001). No fractures were observed for Magmaris scaffolds, but 15.2% were documented for DESolve BRS (p &lt; 0.001). Incomplete scaffold apposition area was significantly higher in the DESolve group (0.01 ± 0.02 vs. 1.05 ± 2.32 mm2; p &lt; 0.001).Conclusion: This is the first study to compare the acute mechanical performance between Magmaris and DESolve in a real-world setting. The acute mechanical performance of Magmaris BRS seems to be superior to that of DESolve BRS, whereas OCT showed a good acute mechanical performance for both BRS in terms of generally accepted imaging criteria.

scholarly journals Real World Use of Extended Half-Life Products and the Impact on Bleeding Events and Joint Health in the United States

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1195-1195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn M. Malec ◽  
Char M Witmer ◽  
Julie Jaffray ◽  
Peter A. Kouides ◽  
Kristina M. Haley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Joint Health

Abstract Background : The hemophilia treatment landscape has evolved substantially in the last several years with the approval of extended half-life (EHL) products which reduce the burden of prophylaxis. Data reported from the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) as of June 2017 indicate that 21% of patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A, and 42% of patients with moderate or severe hemophilia B, receive prophylaxis utilizing an EHL. As new treatments become available and are adopted into practice, it is important to recognize the need for evaluation of efficacy, safety, and economic impact of their use outside of the clinical trial setting. We aimed to characterize the real world impact of EHL products by collecting detailed information on bleeding rates, joint health and quality of life amongst patients cared for at ATHN-affiliated Hemophilia Treatment Centers. We hypothesized that use of EHL products were utilized in at least 30% of patients and would lead to decreased ABRs and improved joint health. To date 67 of a planned 135 subjects have been enrolled, constituting this interim analysis. Methods:Subjects were recruited from seven U.S. Hemophilia Treatment Centers. Subjects with severe hemophilia A or B ≤ 30 years of age on prophylaxis or demand therapy were eligible for enrollment. Subjects excluded from study were those with a recent joint bleed (within the last 2 weeks) or those unwilling to complete all elements of the study. Data were collected during a one-time encounter concurrent with an appointment for clinical evaluation, including demographic information, treatment regimen, product type, frequency, location and severity of all bleeds, Hemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS), and Quality of life (QoL). Bleeding rates in subjects receiving prophylaxis were compared with those receiving on demand therapy by type treatment, EHL vs standard half-life (SHL), and by hemophilia type. Severity of bleeding events (mild, moderate, or severe) and HJHS were compared by prophylaxis groups. Results: A total of 67 patients were enrolled and eligible for analysis. This included 58 subjects with severe hemophilia A, and 9 subjects with severe hemophilia B. The mean age of the cohort was 15 years (median 12 years, IQR 8 - 21 years). For these patients whose race information was known, 89.1% were Caucasian, 3.3% African-American, 3.3% Asian, and 4.7% were of mixed or 'other' race. Eleven out of 61 (18.0%) subjects with known ethnicity were Hispanic. Among 59 patients whose treatment type were available, the majority were on prophylaxis (n=53; 89.8%) as compared to on demand therapy (n=6; 10.2%). The average annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 2.8 amongst all individuals. As expected, the ABR was substantially lower in those receiving prophylaxis (ABR=1.0) as compared to on demand therapy (ABR=18.6) (p<0.001). Additionally, HJHS in those receiving prophylaxis was lower (mean HJHS= 3.9), meaning less evidence of joint damage, than in those receiving demand therapy (mean HJHS= 8.8) (p=0.162). For patients with severe hemophilia A, the ABR was lower in those individuals receiving EHL (ABR= 0.5) versus SHL (ABR= 1.5), although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.136). All subjects with severe hemophilia B enrolled to date receive EHL products (n=9) therefore no comparison of ABR could be made between EHL and SHL products; the ABR in this group was 0.9. In patients with severe hemophilia A, there was a higher HJHS for those receiving EHL (mean HJHS= 7.0) versus those receiving SHL (mean HJHS = 2.1) (p=0.053). For patients with severe hemophilia B, all of whom received EHL, the mean HJHS was lower than in the hemophilia A cohort (mean HJHS=1.2). Conclusions: We report real-world bleeding events and joint health in patients with severe hemophilia A and B utilizing EHL and SHL products across a wide U.S. geographic distribution. As anticipated, there is substantial bleed reduction with prophylaxis versus on demand therapy. In our severe hemophilia A cohort, the ABR for patients receiving EHL products was similar to ABRs reported in clinical trials, suggesting clinical trial data may be reflective of real world use. Patients with severe hemophilia A receiving EHL for prophylaxis had a lower ABR than those receiving SHL, although the early impact is not reflected in the HJHS score. Longer follow-up will be necessary to determine the impact of EHL on HJHS. Disclosures Malec: Bioverativ: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy. Jaffray:Octapharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kouides:UniQure: Other: DSMB; Octapharma: Research Funding. Sidonio:Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board; Shire: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Other: Advisory Board; Kedrion: Research Funding; Biomarin: Other: Advisory Board; Grifols: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Uniqure: Other: Advisory Board. Abshire:CSL: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Other: DSMB. White:Asklepios: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Shire: Other: Physician Leadership Group; Bayer: Other: GRAC; Bioverativ: Other: DSMB; Biomarin: Other: DSMB; Invitrox: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Pfizer: Equity Ownership. Ragni:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; SPARK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Sangamo: Research Funding; MOGAM: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

SO073IRON-RELATED PARAMETERS AND ANTI-ANAEMIC THERAPY IN HAEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH SUCROFERRIC OXYHYDROXIDE: A 1-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE EUROPEAN CLINICAL DATABASE (EUCLID) ANALYSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayne Carey-George ◽  
Konstantin Gurevich ◽  
Rosa Ramos Sanchez ◽  
Charles Chazot ◽  
Anibal Ferreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Transferrin Saturation ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Clinical Database ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Iv Iron ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Previous Phase

Abstract Background and Aims This retrospective analysis of data from the European Clinical Database (EuCliD®) evaluated changes in iron-related parameters and use of concomitant anti-anaemic therapies in European haemodialysis (HD) patients treated with sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH). Previous Phase 3 clinical studies and non-clinical studies have indicated that there is minimal iron absorption from SFOH. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in iron-related parameters among patients treated with SFOH in the real-world setting. Method De-identified patient data were extracted from a clinical database (EuCliD®) for adult HD patients newly prescribed SFOH routinely for up to 1 year (1 Jan 2015–1 Jan 2019). Levels of serum ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT) and haemoglobin were compared between baseline (BL; 3-month period before starting SFOH) and each quarterly period in the year after starting SFOH treatment (Q1–Q4). Proportions of patients receiving intravenous (IV) iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapies, in addition to their mean weekly doses, during each quarter were recorded. Results The cohort included 1,096 patients with recorded SFOH prescriptions (mean age: 60.6 years; 65.8% male). There were small, but significant increases in ferritin from BL to Q1–Q4 (P&lt;0.05 for all periods vs BL). There were also increases in TSAT (P&lt;0.05 at Q1 and Q2 vs BL) and haemoglobin (P&lt;0.001 at Q1 and Q3 vs BL) (Table). During the 1-year SFOH treatment period, the proportion of patients receiving IV iron therapy decreased (P&lt;0.05 at Q2 and Q3 vs BL) and there was a significant reduction in the mean weekly dose of IV iron administered (P&lt;0.05 at Q2 and Q3 vs BL). The use of ESA therapy also declined (P&lt;0.05 at Q3 and Q4) and there was a significant decrease in the mean weekly dose of ESA during the 1-year SFOH follow-up period (P&lt;0.05 for all periods vs BL). Conclusion This real-world study showed that SFOH treatment in routine clinical practice for up to 1 year was associated with small increases in iron-related parameters and decreases in the use and mean dose of concomitant anti-anaemic therapies in European HD patients. The results from this study indicate that SFOH treatment may be associated with the reduction in concomitant IV iron and ESA use in HD patients, in line with previous findings from the Phase 3 study.

scholarly journals POS0296 DOSING OF BDMARDS IN AXSPA AND PSA IN A REAL WORLD SETTING

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 373.1-373
Author(s):  
A. Regierer ◽  
A. Weiß ◽  
D. Poddubnyy ◽  
H. Kellner ◽  
F. Behrens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Biologic Dmards ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Receive Treatment ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal ◽  
Higher Doses

Background:The treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has been revolutionised by the introduction of biologic DMARDs targeting TNF, IL17, and IL23 inhibitors (i). In Germany, about 30-50% of axSpA and PsA patients receive treatment with bDMARDs. Although many patients benefit from these drugs, in some patients effectiveness of the standard dose may be insufficient and higher doses are used.Objectives:To describe dosing of TNFi and non-TNFi bDMARDs over a 2 year period in a real world cohort of patients with axSpA and PsA managed by rheumatologists.Methods:RABBIT-SpA is a prospective longitudinal cohort study including axSpA and PsA patients enrolled at the start of a new conventional treatment (including NSAID) or b/tsDMARD treatment. Description of dosing of TNFi (adalimumab bio-original (bo), adalimumab bio-similar (bs), etanercept bo, etanercept bs, golimumab, certolizumab) in comparison to nonTNFi-bDMARDs (secukinumab, ustekinumab, ixekizumab, guselkumab) in axSpA and PsA. Standard dosing was defined according to the current labels for axSpA and PsA.Results:1628 patients (axSpA: n=903, PsA: n=725) were included in this analysis. At inclusion mean age was 44 years in axSpA and 51 years in PsA. 44% of patients with axSpA and 58% of those with PsA were female. The mean disease duration of axSpA was 7.6 years, of PsA 6.4 years.Standard doses of TNFi were used during a 2 year period in > 90% of patients with axSpA and PsA (Figure 1). In contrast, standard doses of non-TNFi-bDMARDs were only used in 70-80% of patients. The percentage of documented higher doses in patients with axSpA ranged from 20-30% at different time points. In PsA, this percentage increased from 27% at baseline to 44% at 2 years. On the other hand, TNFi were used in lower doses than the label in up to 9% and 7 % of patients with axSpA and PsA, respectively, after 2 years.Figure 1.Percentages of patients with axSpA or PsA who received less than, equal to, or more than the approved doses of bDMARDs at baseline and at 5 follow-up visits.Conclusion:While TNFi are used in licensed doses in most patients, non-TNFi-bDMARDs were often used in higher doses, which corresponds to higher doses approved in other indications like psoriasis. The effectiveness of this treatment strategy in axSpA and PsA needs to be analysed further.Acknowledgements:RABBIT-SpA is supported by a joint, unconditional grant from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Viatris.We thank all participating patients and rheumatologists.Disclosure of Interests:Anne Regierer Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Viatris., Anja Weiß Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Viatris., Denis Poddubnyy: None declared, Herbert Kellner: None declared, Frank Behrens: None declared, Georg Schett: None declared, Juergen Braun: None declared, Joachim Sieper: None declared, Anja Strangfeld Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Viatris

scholarly journals Effectiveness and Safety Outcomes in Patients with Hemophilia a Receiving Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) for at Least 5 Years in a Real-World Setting: 6-Year Interim Analysis of the Ahead International and German Studies

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Dimitrios A. Tsakiris ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Robert Klamroth ◽  
Benoît Guillet ◽  
Kate Khair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Real World ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Antihemophilic Factor

Introduction: Long-term effectiveness and safety data in patients treated in routine clinical practice settings can be captured from real-world studies. The international (INT) and German (GER) Antihemophilic factor (recombinant; rAHF) Hemophilia A (HA) outcome Database (AHEAD) studies assess long-term effectiveness and safety outcomes in patients with moderate HA (factor VIII level 1-5%) or severe HA (factor VIII &lt;1%) receiving rAHF (ADVATE®; Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA) in routine clinical practice. Methods: These are non-interventional, prospective, long-term, multicenter studies (INT: NCT02078427; GER: DRKS 00000556). Key outcomes include Gilbert scores (primary endpoint; pain scored 0-3; bleeding scored 0-3, and physical exam scored 0-12), annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) by disease severity, and adverse events (AEs). Findings reported here are from the 6-year interim analysis (data cut-off: July 15, 2019), and focus on patients who have received rAHF prophylaxis or on-demand (OD) treatment for ≥5 years in the studies. All data are reported for the safety analysis set (SAS), which comprised patients who passed screening and were assigned to a treatment group or regimen in the INT study, or were enrolled and have received ≥1 dose of rAHF since study enrollment in the GER study. Results: At the time of analysis, the INT study SAS comprised 707 patients, 156 of whom had received ≥5 years of rAHF treatment during the study. The GER study SAS comprised 382 patients, 231 of whom had received ≥5 years of rAHF treatment. Average Gilbert scores (all joints) were consistently low (years 1-6: median 0-1.0; mean 0-1.3) for both children aged 2 to &lt;12 years and adolescents aged 12 to &lt;18 years receiving rAHF prophylaxis within both studies. In the INT study, average Gilbert scores were lower with prophylaxis than with OD therapy in adults (aged ≥18 years) throughout the observation period (years 1-6: median: 0.9-1.4 [n=8-25] vs 1.4-6.3 [n=2-8], respectively; mean: 1.4-2.2 vs 2.1-6.3; respectively); significant differences (P&lt;0.05) between mean values were observed for years 3, 4, and 6. In the GER study, average Gilbert scores were slightly higher with prophylaxis than with OD in adults (years 1-6: median: 0.7-2.2 [n=12-37] vs 0.3-1.4 [n=2-15], respectively; mean: 1.0-2.7 vs 0.5-2.2, respectively; P-values not available). In the INT study, ABRs were consistently lower in patients receiving rAHF prophylaxis than in those receiving rAHF OD, irrespective of disease severity (Table). A similar trend was observed in the GER study in patients with severe HA, whereas ABRs were similar for both treatment regimens in patients with moderate HA. In both studies, greater proportions of patients with moderate or severe HA receiving rAHF prophylaxis had 0 bleeds than those receiving rAHF OD (Table). In the INT study, 842 AEs were reported in 116/156 (74.4%) patients, including 2 treatment-related serious AEs in 2 (1.3%) patients. In the GER study, 1321 AEs were reported in 197/231 (85.3%) patients, including 29 treatment-related serious AEs in 14 (6.1%) patients. Conclusions: These findings in patients receiving rAHF for ≥5 years in a real-world setting corroborate previous data on the long-term efficacy and tolerability of rAHF in patients with moderate or severe HA. rAHF demonstrated effectiveness in maintaining joint health (as measured by Gilbert scores) in adult patients. Table Disclosures Tsakiris: Roche: Research Funding; Shire, a Takeda company: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding. Oldenburg:Sobi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire, a Takeda company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Klamroth:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biomarin: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Guillet:CSL Behring: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shire, a Takeda company: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche-Chugai: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Khair:Shire, a Takeda company: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta/Shire, Takeda companies: Research Funding. Huth-Kühne:Bayer: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Shire, a Takeda company: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy. Kurnik:Sobi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biotest: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire, a Takeda company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Regensburger:Takeda Pharma Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Botha:Takeda Pharmaceutical International AG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fernandez:Takeda Pharmaceutical International AG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tang:Takeda Pharmaceutical International AG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ozelo:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Real-World Bleeding Outcomes, Weekly Factor Consumption Doses, Annualized Factor Costs in Severe-Type Patients with Hemophilia a (PwHA) before and after Switching to Extended Half-Life rFVIII-Fc Prophylaxis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3198-3198
Author(s):  
Chia-Yau Chang ◽  
Shiue-Wei Lai ◽  
Mei-Mei Cheng ◽  
Pei-Yi Lai ◽  
Jung-Tzu Ku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Episodic Treatment ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Prophylaxis Therapy ◽  
Severe Type

Abstract Introduction: Stand half-life (SHL) rFVIII had been used in patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) for episodic treatment (ET) and prophylaxis therapy (PT) for years. Extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII had been available since 2014, also available in Taiwan since 2018, and resulted in markedly increased willingness for PT because it reduced injection burden. We aimed to investigate the real-world bleeding outcomes, weekly factor doses, and factor costs of severe-type PwHA with pre-switch SHL rFVIII and post-switch EHL rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in Taiwan, and made a pre-switch and post-switch comparison. Methods and Materials: There were totally 51 non-inhibitor, severe-type PwHA, with complete bleeding records before and after switching from SHL rFVIII to EHL rFVIII-Fc, enrolled from two hemophilia centers during Nov, 2018－July, 2019. Most of them had various degree of one to more major joints arthropathy, except children. The medical charts were retrospective reviewed and data were collected, including body features and factor regimen, etc. Patients' annualized bleeding/joint-bleeding rate (ABR/AJBR), weekly doses (WD), annualized factor costs (AFC) were obtained from the chart records of pre-switch 12 months and post-switch at least more-than 6-month until July, 2019. Data from scheduled operation or hospitalization due to trauma or accidence were excluded. Results: There were 8 boys and 43 adults, the median age of all PwHA when switching was 35.6 years (10.5-62). Before switching, these 51 PTP treated with SHL rFVIII who received ET (ET group), irregular prophylaxis (IP group), and regular prophylaxis (RP group) were 19 (37.3%), 7 (13.7%), and 25 (49%), respectively. Bleeding records of 51 PTP treated with SHL rFVIII were traced back with 11.8±0.9 months. After switching to rFVIII-Fc, 3 PwHA receiving ET were excluded, and bleeding records of 48 received RP were obtained with 14.7±4.6 months. Pre-switch and post-switch prophylaxis rate were 62.7% (32/51) and 94.1% (48/51), respectively. For comparison of pre-switch and post-switch outcomes: Median ABR was reduced from 48, 12, and 4 to 1.15, 1.9, and 1.5 for ET, IP, and RP group, respectively. Median AJBR was reduced from 32, 11, and 4 to 0.95, 0.7, and 1.2 for ET, IP, and RP group, respectively. Median WD was increased from 38.4, 52.9, and 63.6 IU/kg/wk to 84.6, 84.5, and 84.9 IU/kg/wk for ET, IP, and RP group, respectively. Median AFC was increased from 4,141,800, 4,064,000 and 5,129,700 NTD to 7,042,325, 5,835,450, and 5,762,810 NTD for ET, IP, and RP group, respectively. Comparing pre-switch and post-switch outcomes of children and adults who received pre-switch and post-switch prophylaxis, median ABR was reduced from 3 and 5 to 1.35 and 1.85 for children and adults, respectively. Median AJBR was reduced from 3 and 4 to 1.35 and 1.15 for children and adults, respectively. Median WD was increased from 58.8 and 58.3 IU/kg/wk to 87.85 and 83.85 IU/kg/wk for children and adults, respectively. Median AFC was increased from 4,104,225 and 5,879,025 NTD to 4,419,800 and 6,024,916 NTD for children and adults, respectively. For all PwHA, zero ABR accounted for 5.9% (3/51) with pre-switch SHL rFVIII treatment and for 20.8% (10/48) with post-switch rFVIII-Fc prophylaxis. Zero AJBR accounted for 9.8% (5/51) with SHL rFVIII treatment and for 33.3% (16/48) with rFVIII-Fc prophylaxis. For PwHA with pre- and post-switch prophylaxis, zero ABR accounted for 12.5% (1/8) and 8.3% (2/24), respectively, for children and adults on SHL rFVIII prophylaxis and 25% (2/8) and 25% (6/24) respectively, for children and adults on rFVIII-Fc prophylaxis. Zero AJBR accounted for 12.5% (1/8) and 16.7% (4/24), respectively, for children and adults on SHL rFVIII prophylaxis and 25% (2/8) and 37.5% (9/24) respectively, for children and adults on rFVIII-Fc prophylaxis. Conclusion: In real-world setting, for pre-switch ET group, switch to rFVIII-Fc prophylaxis made both mean ABR and AJBR reduced &gt;95%, and mean WD increased &gt;50%. For pre-switch IP group, switch to rFVIII-Fc prophylaxis made both mean ABR and AJBR reduced &gt;80%, and mean WD increased &gt;35%. For pre-switch RP group, switch to rFVIII-Fc prophylaxis made both mean ABR and AJBR also reduced &gt;45%, and mean WD increased &gt;20%. The proportions in zero ABR and zero AJBR as post-switch rFVIII-Fc prophylaxis were increased. No matter in ET, IP, or RP group, after switching to RP with rFVIII-Fc, improvement for bleeding outcomes was quite evident. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

P031 Adherence with Methotrexate in Tunisian Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Patients

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiba Bettaieb ◽  
Wafa Triki ◽  
Kaouther Maatallah ◽  
Hanene Ferjani ◽  
Dorra Ben Nessib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Rheumatoid Factor ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
High Adherence ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in the pediatric population. Methotrexate (MTX) has been considered as the cornerstone of treatment of poly and oligoarticular subtypes of JIA. However, this treatment is supposed to be for long term, which may involve an obstacle for adherence. The aims of the study were to evaluate adherence of Tunisian JIA patients to MTX and to identify factors associated with high adherence to MTX. Methods A cross-sectional study including patients with confirmed JIA diagnosis, according to the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria, was performed. Demographic data as well as disease characteristics were obtained from medical records. Laboratory markers including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were collected. Adherence was measured, for patients under MTX for &gt;3 months, using the 5-item Compliance Questionnaire Rheumatology (CQR5) (1). Patients were divided into two groups: group 1: High adherence (HA) for patients having a CQR5 ≥ 80% and group 2: low adherence (LA) for patients having CQR5 &lt; 80%. A p inferior to 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study included 29 patients (10 males and 19 females) with a mean age at disease onset of 9.1 ± 3.4 years. The mean disease duration was 61 ± 79 months [7–336]. JIA subtypes were in decreasing order of frequency as follows: enthesitis-related arthritis (n = 13), oligoarticular (n = 8), Polyarticular without rheumatoid factor (n = 4), Polyarticular with rheumatoid factor (n = 2), systemic (n = 1) and, psoriatic arthritis (n = 1). A biologic inflammatory syndrome was found in 48.3% (n = 14) of cases. The mean ESR and CRP were 20 mm/h ± 11.3 [3–98] and 5 ± 17.8 mg/l [0–56] respectively. Nineteen (65.5%) patients had coxitis. Overall, 55.17% of patients (n = 16) were treated with MTX with a mean weekly dose of 9.2 ± 3.2 mg [5–15]. MTX was orally administrated in all patients. NSAIDs and prednisone were prescribed in 51.7% (n = 15) and 17.2% (n = 5) of cases respectively. The MTX was associated with biological DMARDs in five patients (17.2%). It was about Etanercept in 4 patients and Tocilizumab in 1 patient. Mean CQR5 score was 70.8% ± 18 [25–100]. Only seven patients (43.8%) showed high adherence to MTX. The statistical study revealed no difference between HA and LA in term of gender (P = 0.84), age at disease onset (P = 0.39), disease duration (P = 0.9), prednisone use (P = 0.22), the occurrence of coxitis (P = 0.2), ESR (P = 0.83) and CRP (P = 0.033) rates. Conclusion In this study, less than one half of JIA patients were highly adherent to MTX according to CQR5. Low adherence should be considered before declaring MTX treatment failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document