Luspatercept in MDS with Ring Sideroblasts: A Real-Life Multicenter Experience from a Named Patient Program

Abstract Background Low risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (LR MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal disorders of the hematopoietic stem cell characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias and relative increase of bone marrow blasts [List 2004]. The most common cytopenia is anemia, which occurs in 85-90% of cases (isolated in 35% of cases) [Fenaux 2013], and ranges from mild/asymptomatic to transfusion dependent. The standard of care for anemia remains supportive care and about 70% of cases benefits from erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). According to the FAB classification, a low-risk group of MDS characterized by the presence of ring sideroblasts (RS) was recognized. In the 2017 WHO classification, the nosologic entities of MDS uni-linear and multi-linear dysplasia with RS (MDS-UD-RS, MDS-MD-RS) were established, to emphasize the importance of identifying forms with a potential therapeutic target [Arber 2016]. Luspatercept is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of the modified extracellular domain of human activin receptor type IIB (ActRIIB) linked to a domain of human immunoglobulin Fc G1. The drug showed efficacy in re-establishing erythropoiesis and was recently approved for the treatment of adult patients with very low- to intermediate-risk MDS-RS failing ESAs[Platzbecker 2017; Fenaux 2020]. Aims To retrospectively assess the efficacy and/or clinical benefit (defined as a reduction in red blood cells transfusions [RBCT] or increase in hemoglobin levels) of luspatercept in patients with LR MDS with RS in a real-life setting. Safety issues were also addressed and clinical and hematological predictors of outcome analyzed. Methods We considered all IPSS-R lower-risk MDS with RS patients with unsatisfactory response or unsuitable for ESAs, treated with luspatercept as monotherapy through an expanded access program since November 2020, in 2 tertiary hematologic centers in Milan, Italy. Luspatercept was administered according to the published schedule: starting dose 1,0 mg/kg every three weeks, with the possibility to increase up to 1,33 mg/kg and 1,75 mg/kg if patients did not reach transfusion independence or decreased transfusion burden after two consecutive infusions. Response to luspatercept was evaluated according to IWG 2018 criteria: Hb increase by > 1.5 g/dL and/or relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 wk compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 wk. Results We included a total of 17 pts (70% males, 30% females), with a median age of 68 years (range 45-89). The median follow-up from the start of the Luspatercept was 4 months (range 3-6).According to WHO 2017 we included 13 MLD (76%) and 4 ULD (24%); in all of them SF3B1 mutations was confirmed. Moreover, According to IPSS-R classification: 5 (27%)cases were intermediate and 12 (73%) low risk. All patients received at least three doses of luspatercept. Nine patients (53%) needed a dose escalation to 1,33 mg/kg, and 7 (41%) required the maximal dose of 1,75 mg/kg. Interestingly, not all patients received a dose escalation, and 8 (47%) obtained prolonged efficacy with 1 mg/kg dose. Hemoglobin levels increased in 9 pts (53%): 4 (24%), 3 (18%) and 2 (12%) cases at 1 mg/Kg, 1,33 mg/kg and 1,75 mg/dl, respectively. Medina increase was 1,5 g/dl (range 0,2 - 2,2) and these levels were maintained for a median of 4 months (range 3-6). In addition, considering transfusion burden, the independence was reached in 3 pts (18%), after a median time of 6 weeks from treatment start. Importantly, off the 14 patients remaining transfusion-dependent, 6 (35%) reduced the transfusion burden. The most prominent toxicity was increased blood pressure (grade 2) occurring in 3 pts (18%), and dizziness (grade 2) in 2 pts (12%); though the drug was generally well tolerated. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. Therefore, patients were treated as outpatients in all cases. At the last follow up, all patients are alive and free from leukemic evolution. Conclusions: Our real-world experience confirms the efficacy of luspatercept in improving erythropoiesis and decreasing transfusion dependency in very low, low or intermediate risk MDS with RS, with an acceptable toxicity profile. Disclosures Fattizzo: Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Speakers Bureau; Annexon: Consultancy; Momenta: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Kira: Speakers Bureau. Barcellini: Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Biological Characteristics and Outcomes of Richter Transformation : A French Multicenter Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128053 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4112-4112

Author(s):

Charline Moulin ◽

Romain Morizot ◽

Thomas Remen ◽

Hélène Augé ◽

Florian Bouclet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Long Term Survivors ◽

First Line Treatment

Introduction: About 2 to 10% of patients (pts) diagnosed with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, so-called Richter transformation (RT)) over long-term follow-up. The outcomes of pts with RT are variable and poorly understood and there is no consensus on the best therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, outcomes and factors predictive of survival in a large series of RT from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO). Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT (limited to DLBCL and excluding Hodgkin lymphoma) diagnosed from 2001 to 2018 were identified from eight FILO centers. Clinical and biological characteristics of CLL and RT at diagnosis, including cytogenetics, clonal relation with the pre-existing CLL, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, cell of origin (COO) analyzed by immunohistochemistry and RT score (Tsimberidou AM et al, J Clin Oncol, 2006) were analyzed as well as treatment and outcomes. Overall survivals (OS) were defined as time from CLL and RT diagnosis to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4. Results: A total of 70 CLL pts who developed RT were identified. The median age at CLL diagnosis was 62 years old (range 35-82), and 50 (71.4 %) were male. The median time to transformation was 5.5 years (range 0 to 22 years), with 12 simultaneous diagnosis of CLL and RT. Prior to RT, 20 (29%) pts had not been treated for CLL, 50 received one (n=21) or more (n= 29) line of treatment ; 6 pts had received a novel agent (ibrutinib, idelalisib or venetoclax). The median age at RT diagnosis was 68 years old (range 42-88). All biopsies were centrally reviewed; 38/58 pts (66%) had elevated LDH (>1.5N) ; 35/65 pts (54 %) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm); 10/54 (18.5%) pts had del(17p) or TP53 mutation ; 9/42 pts (21%) had a complex karyotype (at least 3 abnormalities). The CLL and RT were clonally related in 27/27 (100%) tested pts. COO by Hans algorithm was non germinal center B cell-like (GCB) in 26/28 pts (93%). EBV was positive or detected in 5/40 (12.5%) pts. The median of Ki67 positivity was 70% (range 30% to 100%). The RT score (based at RT diagnosis on ECOG performance status 2-4, LDH >1.5 x normal, platelets<100 x 109/L, tumor size >5 cm and >1 prior therapy for CLL) was : low risk in 17 pts (31%), low-intermediate risk in 10 pts (19%), high-intermediate risk in 14 pts (25%) and high risk in 14 pts (25%). The most common first-line treatment of RT was immunochemotherapy (n=57, 87%) including R-CHOP-like regimen (n=48, 73%). Autologous or allogeneic transplantation was performed for 7 pts (11%). Response to first-line treatment was complete or partial response in 26 pts (40%), and stable disease or progression in 39 pts (60%). After a median follow-up of 8 years, 51/64 pts (80%) have died. The main causes of death were progressive DLBCL (n=36, 71%), infection (n=8, 16%) or progressive CLL (n=2, 4%). The median OS of the cohort from CLL and RT diagnosis (Figure 1) were 7.8 years and 9.5 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with TP53 disruption at CLL stage, low platelets count, elevated LDH, elevated beta2-microglobulin, high ECOG score, high RT score, EBV positivity and absence of response to first-line RT treatment had worse OS. The ECOG score, platelets count and TP53 disruption remain significant in multivariate Cox-regression. Last, we compared the clinical and biological parameters of two Richter groups defined as: (i) short-term survivors (<12 months, n = 34) and (ii) long-term survivors (>48 months, n = 18). Long survival was significantly associated with elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to RT first-line treatment. Discussion: The clinical outcomes of RT patients is poor and novel treatment options are needed. However, a group of long-term survivors was identified, characterized by elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to immunochemotherapy. Disclosures Leblond: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cymbalista:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Guièze:Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Broseus:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Feugier:gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Routine Use of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in 7+3-Based Inductions for All "Non-Adverse" Risk AML

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142691 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 36-37

Author(s):

Gavin Hui ◽

Abdullah Ladha ◽

Edna Cheung ◽

Caroline Berube ◽

Steven Coutre ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Myeloablative Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Monosomy 7

Introduction: The addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to 7+3 chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been shown to significantly improve event-free survival (EFS) for cytogenetically favorable-risk AML, with marginal benefit for intermediate-risk AML, and no benefit for cytogenetically adverse-risk AML. Of note, with the exception of mutated FLT3-ITD, little is known about the impact of GO in ELN 2017-defined genotypically adverse-risk AML, and a recent randomized trial found no EFS benefit for 7+3+GO in patients (pts) with genotypically favorable-risk, NPM1-mutated AML. Since 2017, our institution incorporated GO into 7+3-based inductions for all "non-adverse" risk AML pts, as defined by wild-type FLT3 and no abnormalities on rapid FISH analysis for del(5q)/monosomy 5, del(7q)/monosomy 7, and del(20q). We report our experience treating all pts with "non-adverse" risk AML-as defined by this algorithm-with 7+3+GO. Methods: An institutional database was queried in order to identify all pts ≥18 years old who received 7+3-based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML between 2017 and 2020; pts who received the FDA-approved fractionated dose of GO were included in the analysis. Data collection included demographic variables, karyotype/FISH, targeted PCR analyses, and multigene NGS panels for AML-related mutations including, but not limited to, mutations in FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, TP53, RUNX1, and ASXL1. Outcome data included response to induction, relapse, and death, as well as hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) rates, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complications. Results: Between January 2017 and July 2020, 96 pts received 7+3-based induction at our institution. Of these, 29 (30%) received 7+3 in combination with GO. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years (range 23-66), with 17 (59%) males. Sixteen (55%) pts had ELN favorable-risk AML (5 [31%] by cytogenetics and 11 [69%] by genotype), 6 (21%) pts had ELN intermediate-risk AML, and 7 (24%) pts had ELN adverse-risk AML (4 [57%] by cytogenetics and 3 [43%] by genotype). Median time from diagnosis to start of induction was 4 days (range 0-43). For cytogenetically adverse-risk pts, median time from diagnostic bone marrow biopsy to receipt of adverse karyotype results was 8 days (7-14). Median time from start of induction to receipt of multigene NGS results for all pts was 15 days (3-32). Overall, 22 (76%) pts achieved remission. All genotypically adverse-risk pts (1 with mutated TP53 and 2 with mutated RUNX1) were refractory to induction, while 3 of 4 (75%) cytogenetically adverse-risk pts (1 with t(6;9), 1 with monosomy 7, and 2 with 11q23 abnormalities) achieved remission. Eight of the 29 (28%) pts proceeded to HCT, including 4 adverse-risk pts. Of the adverse-risk pts, all received myeloablative conditioning prior to HCT and 3 (75%) developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD), with 2 (50%) requiring defibrotide therapy. In favorable/intermediate-risk pts, 4 (18%) proceeded to HCT (2 intermediate-risk pts in first remission and 2 favorable-risk pts in second remission). Of these, 2 (50%) received myeloablative conditioning and 1 (25%) developed VOD. At last follow-up, 23 of 29 pts (79%) remained alive, with a median overall survival not reached (range 1-29 months) and a median EFS of 20 months (9-31). The percentage of ELN favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk pts who remained event-free at last follow-up was 75%, 33%, and 43%, respectively. Discussion: This single-center, retrospective cohort describes the outcomes of pts with "non-adverse" risk AML who received induction chemotherapy with 7+3+GO according to a pre-defined algorithm. Using this algorithm, 30% of all pts receiving 7+3-based inductions received GO. Of these, nearly 25% were ultimately found to have adverse-risk AML as defined by ELN 2017 criteria, largely driven by long turn-around times for karyotyping and NGS multigene panel results. No patient with genotypically adverse-risk AML by ELN criteria responded to induction chemotherapy, and 75% of cytogenetically adverse-risk pts who proceeded to HCT developed VOD. Routine use of 7+3+GO induction outside of the context of cytogenetically favorable-risk AML remains controversial, and further study is needed to define the role of GO, particularly for pts with ELN genotypically adverse-risk AML. Table Disclosures Gotlib: Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair of the Response Adjudication Committee and Research Funding, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: co-chair of the Study Steering Committee and Research Funding. Liedtke:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muffly:Adaptive: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Research Funding. Mannis:AbbVie, Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech: Consultancy; Glycomimetics, Forty Seven, Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Persistent Improvement In Clinical Outcomes With Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone Vs Thalidomide-Dexamethasone Incorporated Into Double Autologous Transplantation For Multiple Myeloma: An Updated Analysis Of Phase 3 Gimema-MMY-3006 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.2090.2090 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 2090-2090 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Michele Cavo ◽

Monica Galli ◽

Annalisa Pezzi ◽

Francesco Di Raimondo ◽

Claudia Crippa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Low Risk ◽

Standards Of Care ◽

Consolidation Therapy ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract Over the last years, incorporation of novel agents into autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has improved markedly the outcomes of younger patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Superior results with experimental treatments vs previous standards of care have been frequently reported after preliminary analyses and need to be confirmed with longer follow up. The randomized phase 3 GIMEMA-MMY-3006 study was designed to compare bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) vs thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) as induction therapy before, and consolidation after, double ASCT. Data from the initial analysis, with a median follow up of 36 months, demonstrated that patients randomized to the VTD arm enjoyed superior complete/near complete response (CR/nCR) rates after both induction and consolidation therapy, and had a significantly longer PFS compared to those prospectively assigned to the TD arm. We performed an updated analysis of the study after a median follow up of 59 months and results are herein reported. A persistent TTP and PFS benefit with incorporation of VTD into ASCT was confirmed. On an intention-to-treat analysis of 236 patients randomized to the VTD arm, median TTP was 62 months and median PFS was 57 months. The median values for 238 patients randomly assigned to the TD arm were 45 months for TTP (HR=0.64, p=0.001) and 42 months for PFS (HR=0.66, p=0.001) (Fig. 1). With the longer follow up of this analysis, an initial divergence between OS curves could be appreciated after 4 years, although the difference was not yet statistically significant at 6 years (75% for VTD vs 69% for TD). Superiority of VTD over TD for TTP and PFS was retained across prespecified subgroups of patients with high risk and low risk disease. In particular, PFS benefit with VTD was seen for patients age >60 years (HR=0.62, p=0.013) and younger than 60 years (HR=0.70, p=0.026), with ISS stage 1 (HR=0.59, p=0.009) and ISS stage 2-3 (HR=0.69, p=0.018), and for those with t(4;14) and/or del(17p) (HR=0.43, p<0.001) and with t(4;14) alone [t(4;14) positivity but lack of del(17p)] (HR=0.41, p=0.001). In comparison with patients with t(4;14) positivity who were randomized to TD, those assigned to the VTD arm had significantly longer PFS (median: 24 vs 53 months, HR=0.41, p=0.0007) (Fig. 2) and a trend towards longer OS (4-year estimates: 66% vs 81%, p=0.052). By the opposite, similar PFS curves were seen for patients in the VTD group regardless of the presence or absence of t(4;14) (Fig. 3). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, randomization to the VTD arm was an independent factor predicting for prolonged PFS (HR=0.64, P=0.001). Additional disease- and treatment-related variables independently affecting PFS included attainment of CR/nCR after both induction (HR=0.64, p=0.010) and consolidation therapy (HR=0.57, p<0.001), β2-m >3.5 mg/L (HR=1.7, p<0.001) and presence of t(4;14) and/or del(17p) (HR=2.0, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, β2-m, cytogenetic abnormalities and attainment of CR/nCR after consolidation therapy were independently associated with OS. With an updated median follow-up of 49 months from the landmark of starting consolidation therapy, median PFS was 50 months for patients receiving VTD consolidation and 38 months for those treated with TD (HR= 0.69, P=0.015) (Fig. 4). Superior PFS with VTD vs TD consolidation therapy was observed for patients who failed CR/nCR after the second ASCT (HR=0.48, P=0.003) and was retained in both low risk and high risk subgroups. Finally, duration of OS from relapse or progression was similar between the two treatment groups (median, 42 for VTD vs 35 months for TD, p=0.47), even when bortezomib was incorporated into salvage therapy. In conclusion, this updated analysis of the GIMEMA-MMY-3006 study demonstrated: 1) a persistent PFS benefit with VTD vs TD in the overall population, as well as in subgroups of patients with high risk and low risk MM; 2) the ability of VTD, but not of TD, incorporated into double ASCT to overcome the adverse prognosis related to t(4;14); 3) the significant contribution of VTD consolidation to improved outcomes seen for patients randomized to the VTD arm; 4) the lack of more resistant relapse after exposure to VTD as induction and consolidation therapy compared to TD. A longer follow up is required to assess the OS benefit, if any, with VTD plus double ASCT. Disclosures: Cavo: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tacchetti:Janssen and Celgene: Honoraria. Zamagni:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Caravita:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Brioli:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Disease-Attributable Mortality in the Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Study from the Spanish MDS Cooperative Group (GESMD)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1672.1672 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1672-1672

Author(s):

Meritxell Nomdedeu ◽

Xavier Calvo ◽

Dolors Costa ◽

Montserrat Arnan ◽

Helena Pomares ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Mortality Rates ◽

Low Risk ◽

Attributable Mortality ◽

Risk Category ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Very High ◽

Risk Categories

Abstract Introduction: The MDS are a group of clonal hematopoietic disorders characterized by blood cytopenias and increased risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The MDS predominate in old people (median age at diagnosis > 70 years) so that a fraction of the observed mortality would be driven by age-related factors shared with the general population rather than the MDS. Distinguishing between the MDS-related and unrelated mortality rates will help better assessment of the population health impact of the MDS and more accurate prognostication. This study was aimed at quantifying the MDS-attributable mortality and its relationship with the IPSSR risk categories. Methods: The database of the GESMD was queried for patients diagnosed with primary MDS after 1980 according to the WHO 2001 classification. Patients with CMML, younger than 16 years or who lacked the basic demographic or follow-up data were excluded. Relative survival and MDS-attributable mortality were calculated by the cohort method and statistically compared by Poisson multivariate regression as described by Dickman (Stat Med 2004; 23: 51). Three main parameters were calculated: the observed (all-cause) mortality, the MDS-attributable mortality (both as percentage of the initial cohort), and the fraction of the observed mortality attributed to the MDS. Results: In total, 7408 patients met the inclusion criteria and constitute the basis for this study. Among these patients, 5307 had enough data to be classified according to the IPSSR. Median age was 74 (IQR: 16-99) years and 58 % were males. The most frequent WHO categories were RAEB, type I or II (29% of cases), RCMD (28%), and RA with ring sideroblasts (16%). Most patients (72%) were classified within the very low and low risk categories of the IPSSR. At the study closing date (December 2014), 1022 patients had progressed to AML, 3198 had died (974 after AML) and 3210 were censored alive. The median actuarial survival for the whole series was 4.8 (95% CI: 4.6-5.1) years and 30% of patients are projected to survive longer than 10 years. The overall MDS-attributable mortality at 5 years from diagnosis was 39%, which accounted for three-quarters of the observed mortality (51%, figure). The corresponding figures at 10 years for the MDS-attributable and observed mortality were 55% and 71%, respectively. According to the IPSSR, the 5-year MDS-attributable mortality rates was 19% for the very low risk category, 39% (low risk), 70% (intermediate risk), 78% (high risk), and 92% (very high risk). On average, the incidence rate ratio for the MDS-attributable mortality increased 1.9 times (95% CI: 1.7-2.3, p<0.001) as the IPSSR worsened from one to the next risk category. The fraction of the observed mortality attributed to the MDS was 0.55 for the very low risk category, 0.79 (low risk), 0.93 (intermediate risk), 0.96 (high risk), and 0.99 (very high risk). After distinguishing between AML-related and unrelated mortality, the 5-year MDS-attributable mortality not related to AML was 10% for the very low risk category, 20% (low risk), 33% (intermediate risk), 42% (high risk), and 44% (very high risk). By comparing these figures with the above ones, we could estimate that about 50% of the MDS-attributable mortality was AML-unrelated and that such fraction kept nearly constant across the five IPSSR categories. Conclusions: About three-quarters of the mortality observed in patients with MDS is caused by the disease, the remaining one-quarter being due to MDS-independent factors shared with the general population. The MDS-attributable mortality increases with the IPSSR risk category, from half the observed mortality in the very low risk to nearly all the mortality observed in the high and very high risk groups. Half the MDS-attributable mortality is driven by factors unrelated to leukemic transformation, a proportion that keeps constant across the five IPSSR risk categories. Disclosures Valcarcel: AMGEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ramos:AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Esteve:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Advanced Multiple Myeloma: Experience from a Single Center

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5536.5536 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5536-5536

Author(s):

Yizel Elena Paz Nuñez ◽

Beatriz Aguado Bueno ◽

Isabel vicuña Andrés ◽

Ángela Figuera Álvarez ◽

Miriam González-Pardo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Introduction The prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has improved in the last years due to the important advances in the knowledge of the biology of the disease, the implementation of new drugs and the incorporation of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (autoHSCT). The allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) continues to be controversial: it offers a curative potential but with the cost of high toxicity, limiting the procedure to those young patients with a high-risk disease. This procedure shall be performed in expert centers and, whenever possible, in the context of a clinical trial. In the following we describe the experience of our center with alloHSCT in advance multiple myeloma patients. Patients and methods A total of 18 patients were diagnosed with multiple myeloma received an alloHSCT during a 13 year period (1996-2013), with a median age of 46 ± 5.9 years. All of our patients received an allogenic HLA matched sibling donor with reduced-intensity conditioning. The majority of patients were transplanted because of advanced disease, relapse after an autologous transplant or as part of a sequential transplant in patient with a high risk disease. One patient received, in two occasions, an alloHSCT. Around 70% of patients had received more than 3 previous lines of treatment including, in nearly 95%, an autoHSCT. Patient's characteristics can be found on table 1, characteristics of the procedure can be found in table 2.Table 1.Patient«s CharacteristicsN (%)GenderMale Female10 (55,5%) 9 (44,4%)Secreted ProteinIgGκ IgG λ IgA κ BJ Plasmocitoma8 (44,4%) 4 (22,2%) 2 (11,1%) 3 (16,7%) 1 (5,6%)Debut DS stageII-A II-B III-A III-B Plasmocitoma5 (27,8%) 1 (5,6%) 8 (44,4%) 3 (16,7%) 1 (5,6%)Cytogentics at diagnosisMissing Unfavorable Favorable10 (55,5%) 6 (33,3%) 2 (11,1%)Previous lines of treatment²2 3-4 ³56 (33,3%) 10 (55,5%) 2 (11,1%)Previous autoHSCTYes No17 (94,5%) 1 (5,6%)Previous radiotherapyYes No8 (44,4%) 10 (55,6%)Disease status at transplantComplete remission Partial remission Relapse9 (50,0%) 3 (16,7%) 6 (33,3%)Table 2.Treatment characteristicsN (%)Conditioning regimenMyeloablative Reduced-intensity6 (33,3%) 12 (66.7%)Stem cell sourceBone marrow Peripheral blood4 (22.2%) 14 (77.8%)GVHD prophylaxisCsA+MTXCsA+CSCsA+MMF10 (55.6%) 3 (16.7%) 5 (27.8%)InfectionsYes No16 (88.9%) 2 (11.1%)MucositisYes No12 (66.7%) 6 (33.3%)Acute GVHDYes II-IV III-IV No4 (22.3%) 3 (16.7%) 1 (5.6%) 14 (77.8%)Chronic GVHDNo Limited Extensive8 (44.3%) 5 (27.8%) 5 (27.8%) Results: Transplant related mortality (TRM) before day 100th was one case due to a thromboembolic event. Global TRM was 16.6% (3 cases). The incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) was 22%, controlled on most cases when corticosteroids were initiated. More than half of the patients developed chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD), with an equal distribution on either presentation as limited or extensive. (Table 2) The total number of patients eligible for analysis was 17 (one patient was lost on follow-up). With a median follow up of 11 years, the overall survival (OS) was of 8.06 years [IC 95% 4,33-11,78] (figure 1.) and the estimated progression free survival (PFS) was of 25.83 months [IC 95% 8.87-42.79](figure 2). A total of 5 (29,4%) patients are still alive and 2 (11,7%) of them are in complete remission, of these 1 patient did not have a previous autoHSCT with a follow up of almost 15 years. Conclusions: Our results are similar to those reflected on the literature1-2. However we have to point out that our population is homogenous with advanced MM with more than 3 previous lines of treatment including in most cases auto-HSCT. In spite of this, morbility and mortality in our cohort was acceptable with the limitation of a high rate of cGVHD. There is a need of more studies including more patients to evaluate the role of alloHSCT in the era of new drugs for MM. References 1. Rosi-ol L et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in multiple myeloma: long-term results from a single institution. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015. 2. Beaussant Y et al. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Study of the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Disclosures Alegre: Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Trial of the Antibody-Cytokine Fusion Protein F16IL2 in Combination with Anti-CD33 Immunotherapy for Posttransplant AML Relapse

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145859 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2345-2345

Author(s):

Andrew F. Berdel ◽

Christoph Rollig ◽

Martin Wermke ◽

Linus Angenendt ◽

Leo Ruhnke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Fusion Protein ◽

Nk Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Human Antibody ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Introduction Natural killer (NK) cells are key effectors in cancer immunosurveillance and posttransplant immunity, but shortage of environmental growth factors and deficient recognition of malignant cells may limit their anticancer efficacy. We hypothesized that the antibody-mediated anchoring of interleukin-2 (IL-2) to the leukemia-modified extracellular matrix (ECM) would increase NK cell abundance and activity to potentiate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts. In this novel-novel combination dose-escalation phase 1 trial, we enrolled patients with AML relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary activity of F16IL2, an antibody-cytokine fusion protein composed of the human antibody fragment scFv(F16) in diabody format and two molecules of human IL-2, in combination with the Fc-optimized, ADCC-mediating anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody BI 836858. F16 specifically targets the A1 domain of the ECM protein tenascin C (TnC), which is spliced into the TnC molecule during active angiogenesis and tissue remodeling while it is virtually absent in normal tissues. Methods F16IL2 (10 - 20 Mio IU IV) was administered on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 28-day cycles, followed by administration of BI 836858 (10 - 40 mg IV) two days after each F16IL2 infusion. Dose escalation was performed over 4 dose levels (DL). Cohort 1 (10 Mio IU F16IL2 and 10 mg BI 836858, n = 5), cohort 2 (10 Mio IU F16IL2 and 20 mg BI 836858, n = 3), cohort 3 (20 Mio IU F16IL2 and 20 mg BI 836858, n = 4), cohort 4 (20 Mio IU F16IL2 and 40 mg BI 836858, n = 3). Safety and tolerability, pharmacodynamics and -kinetics, clinical efficacy and immune effector cell dynamics were investigated. This trial was registered at EudraCT as #2015-004763-37. Results Between December 2016 and March 2020, 15 patients with a median age of 50 years (range, 20 - 68) were enrolled and treated across 4 dose levels. Six patients (40%) had received two or more prior HSCT. The most frequent drug-related AEs (F16IL2 or BI 836858 or combination) were pyrexia (n = 13, 87%), chills (n = 12, 80%) and infusion-related reactions (n = 9, 60%), consistent with the expected toxicity profile of cytokine-armed or naked mAbs. These events were generally manageable, transient and of grade ≤ 2. One dose-limiting toxicity occurred at each of DL 3 (pulmonary edema) and 4 (acute GVHD). No patient died within the first 30 days of treatment initiation. Whereas no formal maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached, the maximum tested dose of 20 Mio IU F16IL2 and 40 mg BI 836858 was considered the recommended dose (RD). Three objective responses (1 CR, 1 CRi, 1 PR in extramedullary AML) were observed among 7 patients treated at the two higher DL, whereas no responses occurred at the two starting DL. Median OS among all 15 patients was 4.8 months (1.5 - 12.9), with a 6- and 12-month OS of 40% and 27%, respectively. Among those 7 patients whose AML was at least temporarily controlled with study treatment (CR/CRi, PR, SD), 12-month OS was 67% vs. 0% in non-responders. Combination therapy stimulated the expansion and activation of NK cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that the strategy of potentiating ADCC with tumor-targeted immunocytokines is feasible in humans. In the difficult-to-treat situation of posttransplant AML relapse, responses were observed at higher DL, even in patients with extramedullary disease. The antibody-mediated targeted delivery of IL-2 to the ECM combined with anti-CD33 immunotherapy represents an innovative experimental approach associated with acceptable safety and encouraging biologic and clinical activity in posttransplant AML relapse. Disclosures Wermke: Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hemmerle: Philogen S.p.A.: Current Employment. Schäfers: Philogen S.p.A.: Research Funding. Rossig: BMS and Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; AdBoards by Amgen: Honoraria. Stelljes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rueter: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG: Current Employment. Neri: Philogen S.p.A.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: Multiple patents on vascular targeting; ETH Zurich: Patents & Royalties: CD117xCD3 TEA. Berdel: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schliemann: Roche: Consultancy; Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants.

Download Full-text

From Mild Cytopenia to Overt MDS and AML, the Mutational Profile Predicts Progression, but Not Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-110767 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 794-794

Author(s):

Jakob Werner Hansen ◽

Morten Munk Johansen ◽

Maj Karoline Westman ◽

Leonie Saft ◽

Lene Dissing Sjö ◽

...

Keyword(s):

At Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Bone Marrow Cells ◽

Low Risk ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Myeloid Neoplasm ◽

Risk Of Progression

Abstract Purpose: Recurrently mutated genes have been identified in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and, more recently, in patients with unexplained cytopenia. (Kwok et al. Blood 2015, Hansen et al. American Journal of Hematology 2016 and Malcovati et al. Blood 2017). In this study, we investigated the prognostic impact of these mutated genes in patients with idiopathic cytopenia and compared them to a control cohort of patients with low risk MDS. Methods: We included patients with idiopathic cytopenia after routine assessment, without cytogenetic abnormalities. For comparison, a group of low risk MDS patients without cytogenetic abnormalities, excess of blasts or ring sideroblasts were included. All samples were sequenced covering at least the 20 most recurrently mutated genes in MDS, and a subset of cases underwent a blinded morphology review by two hematopathologists. Results: Two hundred and forty nine patients, 171 with idiopathic cytopenia and 78 with low risk MDS, were included in this study. Of these, 80 (47%) and 53 (68%), respectively, had one or more detectable mutations. There was no difference in survival between the groups, however a predefined subset of "adverse mutations" (ASXL1, NRAS, SRSF2, U2AF1, TP53, RUNX1, EZH2, IDH2 and GATA2, adopted from Bejar et al. Current Opinion in Hematology 2017) was associated with inferior survival in the MDS group (p= 0.035), but not in the group with idiopathic cytopenia and at least one mutation (p= 0.43) (Figure 1). However, if an adverse mutation was present in the idiopathic cytopenia group the risk of progression to MDS or AML increased significantly (HR [CI:95%] 12.01 [1.47; 98.23], p= 0.02), after adjusting for age and sex. Thus mutational screening identified the patients with unexplained cytopenia at risk of progressing to an overt myeloid neoplasm (Figure 2). A total of 18 patients (23%) progressed to a myeloid neoplasm during follow up, of those 12 had material available at time of progression. All patients who progressed to AML (n=4) acquired a new driver mutation at time of progression, in contrast to the patients who progressed to MDS or CMML (n=8) without excess of blasts, who showed a clonal expansion or a steady variant allele frequency at the time of progression. TET2 and DNMT3A mutations were more frequent in patients with idiopathic cytopenia, and were associated with less dysplasia of bone marrow cells. A total of 109 cases with idiopathic cytopenia underwent a blinded morphology review by two independent reviewers; ten cases were concordantly reclassified to fulfill the criteria for MDS, and all of these had at least two mutations. None of these have progressed to higher risk MDS and these ten are not included in the 18 patients mentioned above, who progressed to MDS, CMML or AML during follow up. Conclusion: We here show that mutational profiling can identify patients with idiopathic cytopenia who are at risk of progression, but in contrast to low-risk MDS, the presence of adverse mutations in patients with idiopathic cytopenia do not predict inferior survival. Disclosures Hansen: Otsuka Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Grønbæk:Janssen Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Survey of Serum Aspergillus Antigen in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Role in Predicting Invasive Aspergillosis and in Modifying the Therapeutic Strategy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3428.3428 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3428-3428

Author(s):

Van Hung Tran ◽

Florence Persat ◽

Sophie Gardes ◽

Jeremy Monfray ◽

Sophie Ducastelle-Leprêtre ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Chemotherapy ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Aspergillus Antigen ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction Invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains an important cause of mortality in immunocompromised acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving induction chemotherapy and in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for hematological malignancies. Early diagnostic is critical and challenging given the efficacy and availability of several new anti-fungal therapies. In this study, we evaluated the performance of different factors in predicting the occurrence of IA, including the Aspergillus antigen galactomannan (GM) detection in sera. Methods We included all AML patients receiving induction chemotherapy and patients undergoing allo-HSCT for any hematological malignancy at our center between April 2006 and April 2014 with available data on Aspergillus antigen GM. Serologic detection of circulating GM fungal biomarker was considered during the 100 days following the first day of induction chemotherapy in AML patients or from the day of allo-HSCT. Usual follow-up included two GM tests per week, only patients with at least three serum GM results were considered. The GM tests have been performed routinely using the ELISA kit (Platelia Aspergillus antigen ELISA, Biorad), giving the results in index values. Demographic, GM index results and diagnostic data were collected. IA cases were classified as proven or probable according to the EORTC criteria. The value of the first antigen test, the delay to positivity, and the slope of the progression of the index value between the first two antigens concentrations were considered as predictors of IA. ROC curves for each predictor and their combination were performed and prognostic scores were established. Results A total of 775 patients were included : i) 292 AML patients, 153 (52%) males with a median age of 62 years (range: 17-79), 15% were classified as favorable, 8% as intermediate I, 18% as intermediate II and 59% as unfavorable according to cytogenetics and molecular markers; ii) 483 allo-HSCT patients, 293 (61%) were males, median age was 48 years (range: 18-70), among them 234 (48%) AML, 66 (14%) multiple myeloma, 46 (10%) Myelodysplastic syndromes, 38 (8%) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and the rest of patients had other hematological disorders; 233 (48 %) patients received reduced intensity conditioning and 250 (52%) myeloablative conditioning. The disease status at allo-HSCT was complete remission (CR) in 366 (76%) patients and the rest of patients were in less than CR. HSC source was peripheral blood in 42.2% (90 identical siblings, 150 10/10 matched unrelated, 54 9/10 mismatched unrelated), bone marrow in 42.6% (105 identical siblings, 162 10/10 matched unrelated, 45 9/10 mismatched unrelated) and cord blood in 15.2%. A total of 877 episodes with 16121 GM serum antigen results was considered (median: 18 GM tests per patient). During the follow-up, we identified 121 episodes with at least one positive GM test with a cumulative incidence at day 100 of 13.8%. We also diagnosed 48 IA (2 proven, 46 probable), with a cumulative incidence at day 100 of 5.5% in total, 7.2% in AML and 4.3% in allo-HSCT, respectively. We then classified the GM positive episodes in 82 false-positive (68%) and 39 true-positive episodes (32%) for IA, respectively. A majority of IA events occurred during the first 30 days of follow up, GM positivity showing a positive predictive value of 41% versus a negative predictive value of 99%. The three IA predicting factors had similar independent effects and their combinations were performed, allowing the establishment of an area under ROC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.89). Cut off values of the first positive GM serum and slope were equal or higher than 1.04 and 0.04, respectively, and delay to positivity equal or less than 15 days. To simplify the practical use in clinical practice, the prognostic score defining the IA risk probability was defined as the number of predictors present (values from 0 to 3). This score was tested on positive follow-up giving values of 0, 1, 2 or higher for 45 (37%), 39 (32%) and 37 episodes (31%), respectively. A score superior or equal to 2 was indicative of IA in 62% of the cases (figure 1). Conclusion As IA has a significant impact on hematology patient's survival, this GM predictive score combining three predictors (value of the first antigen index, delay of positivity and slope of the index values) may help clinicians to conclude about starting an early preemptive IA treatment. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab for the Treatment of Multiply Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Real-Life Campus ALL Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147325 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3408-3408

Author(s):

Mariarita Sciumè ◽

Cristina Papayannidis ◽

Antonio Curti ◽

Antonella Vitale ◽

Sabina Chiaretti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Real Life ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Intensive Chemotherapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Female Ratio ◽

Immunotherapy Strategy ◽

Blast Count

Abstract Blinatumomab (Blina) and inotuzumab (InO) have improved the outcome of relapsed/refractory B-lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, many patients (pts) relapse after these treatments and little is known on their outcomes after recurrence and re-treatment with subsequent immunotherapy. We hereby describe the clinical characteristics and outcome of 71 pts with R/R B-ALL treated with both Blina and InO in any sequence - Blina/InO or InO/Blina - at different disease recurrences. At diagnosis, the median age was 34 years (15-64) and the male/female ratio was 1.6. Sixteen pts (22%) were Ph+ ALL, 3 (4%) were t(4;11)+ and 9 (13%) carried a complex karyotypes. ECOG PS was 0-1 in 66 pts (93%). At the time of the first immunotherapy, pts had received a median of 2 previous lines of treatment (1-8). All Ph- pts received intensive chemotherapy front-line; Ph+ pts received TKIs and steroids in 13 cases and intensive chemotherapy plus TKIs in 3 cases. Blina was the first salvage treatment (Blino/InO sequence) in 57 pts (80%) and InO (InO/Blina sequence) in 14 (20%). Twenty-seven pts (38%) had underwent a previous allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). At the start of Blina as first immunotherapy, the median bone marrow (BM) blast count was 40% (0-100%); at the start of InO as first immunotherapy, the median BM blast count was 64% (2-90%). An extramedullary involvement was present in 5 patients (9%) in the Blina/InO group and in 1 patients (7%) in the InO/Blina group. During immunotherapy, the median number of lumbar punctures was 2 (0-9). A median of 2 cycles were administered for both Blina (range 1-9) and Ino (range 1-4). In the Blina/InO group, after Blina a G3/4 toxicity occurred in 15 cases (26%): non-hematologic in 12 cases (21%), neurologic in 6 (8%). Infections occurred in 17 pts (30%). In the InO/Blina group, after InO a G3/4 toxicity occurred in 3 pts (21%), with extra-hematologic toxicity in 2 cases (14%, liver toxicity 1 case). Infections occurred in 4 cases (28%). In the Blina/InO group, after Blina 36 pts (63%) achieved a complete remission (CR), with a negative minimal residual disease (MRD) in 24 (42%) pts; after InO, a CR was re-achieved in 47 pts (82.4%), with 34 (59.6%) being MRD-. In the InO/Blina group, after InO a CR was reached in 13 cases (93%), with 6 pts (42.8%) being MRD-; after Blina, a CR was re-achieved in 6 pts (42.8%), with 3 (21.4%) being MRD-. This salvage immunotherapy strategy represented a bridge to alloHSCT for 26 pts (37%). From the first immunotherapy, in the Blina/InO group, the median overall survival (OS) was 19 months and after InO 6.3 months (OS in MRD- vs MRD+, p ns). Disease free survival (DFS) after Blina was 7.4 months (11.6 vs 2.7 months in MRD- vs MRD+ pts, p .03) and after InO it was 5.4 months (MRD- vs MRD+ pts, p ns). In the InO/Blina group, the median OS was 9.4 months and after Blina 4.6 months (7.5 vs 2.8 months in MRD- vs MRD+ pts, p .02). DFS after InO was 5.1 months (MRD- vs MRD+ pts, p ns) and after Blina it was 1.5 months (8.7 vs 2.5 gg in MRD- vs MRD+ pts, p .02). OS and DFS in MRD- pts after Blina was significantly better, both in the Blina/InO and the InO/Blina groups. With a median follow-up of 16.5 months from the start of immunotherapy and 33.8 months from initial diagnosis, 24 pts (34%) are alive and 16 (22%) are alive in CR. Four patients (6%) died in CR due to veno-occlusive disease during HSCT after InO treatment. Interestingly, OS and DFS from the first immunotherapy was better in pts with a previous alloHSCT (median survival 24.2 vs 13 months, p=.0135). AlloHSCT after second immunotherapy was associated with a better OS and DFS (OS 9.8 and DFS 7.2 months vs 7.8 and 4.4 months, p ns). Our real-life study in R/R B-cell ALL pts with multiple previous lines of treatment demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of a sequential immunotherapy strategy in terms of MRD response, DFS and OS, and as a bridge to HSCT. SM and PC: equal contributors Disclosures Papayannidis: Janssen: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Curti: Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chiaretti: amgen: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Forghieri: Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria. Bonifacio: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Cerrano: Janssen: Honoraria; Insight: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Fracchiolla: Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

The Use of Venetoclax for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in a Real-Life Setting: A Multicenter National Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128583 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5098-5098

Author(s):

Jacopo Nanni ◽

Giacomo Gianfaldoni ◽

Gianluca Cristiano ◽

Giovanni Marconi ◽

Matteo Piccini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Real Life ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Real ◽

Real Life Setting ◽

Treatment Naïve ◽

Grade Iii

Background The oral anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 protein inhibitor venetoclax has shown strong activity in R/R AML in controlled clinical trials, and recently impressive results in treatment-naïve AML elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. However, limited data are available in the real-life setting. Methods This is a multi-center (n=4), retrospective study involving patients with treatment-naïve or Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) AML treated with Venetoclax in combination with HMAs. Data were collected after anonymous aggregation, in accordance with GCP and Helsinky declaration. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according CTCAE v4.03. Survival is estimated with Kaplan-Meyer method. Results Forty-four patients have been prescribed Venetoclax from March 2018 to June 2019 and completed at least 1 course of venetoclax (range 1-8, median 2, IQR 2.0 - 4.0), being evaluable in this analysis. Patients's characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Five/44 (11.4%) patients had a low risk AML, 21/44 (47.7%) had an intermediate risk AML and 14/44 (31.8%) patients had a high risk AML, according to ELN 2017 risk stratification (4 patients had no available ELN risk at baseline). Six out of 44 (13.6%) patients received Venetoclax in combination with HMAs as first line of therapy, whereas 14/44 (31%) as first line rescue for resistant AML, 15/44 (34.1%) at first relapse, 9/44 (20.5%) for second or further R/R AML. Among R/R patients who received Venetoclax, 17/38 (44.7%) and 21/38 (55.2 %) had received chemotherapy or HMAs as induction therapy, respectively. Overall, Venetoclax was combined with azacitidine in 19/44 patients (43.2%), with decitabine in 19/44 patients (43.2%), with Low-dose of Cytarabine in 5/44 (11.4%), and was performed in monotherapy in 1/44 (2.3%) patient. Three out of 44 patients (6.8%) received a maximum dosage of 100 mg daily, 2/44 (4.5%) received 200 mg, 37/44 (84.1%) received 400mg and 2/44 (4.5%) received 600 mg. Fifteen out of 44 (34.1%) patients reduced the dosage of venetoclax for concomitant Azole administration. The median follow-up is 75.5 (IQR 45.2 - 178.5) days for patients who received upfront venetoclax therapy, while 143 (IQR 49.2 - 235.7) days for R/R patients. In the first-line setting, no patients reduced venetoclax dosage for concomitant adverse events; two neutropenia grade IV and two thrombocytopenia grade III have been documented. In the R/R setting, 14/38 (36.6%) patients reduced venetoclax dosage for concomitant adverse events. Specifically, we reported 22 adverse events, of which 10 were grade III-IV (5 neutropenia grade IV, 2 pancytopenia grade IV, 1 neutropenia grade III and 2 febrile neutropenia grade III). The overall CR rate is 16.7 % in newly-onset AML patients and 28.9 % in R/R patients, respectively. Two out of 6 treatment-naive patients had an evaluable response at 2 months after the beginning of Venetoclax treatment, and 2/6 had an evaluable 4-months response: 1 stable disease (SD) and 1 disease progression (PD) at 2 months,1 SD e 1 complete remission (CR )at 4 months. Thirty-one out of 38 R/R patients had an evaluable response at 2 months and 21/38 had an evaluable 4-month response: 10 CR, 1 complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 14 SD and 6 PD at 2 months; 6 CR, 10 SD and 3 PD at 4 months have been documented. After a short follow-up period (75.5 days), no patients who received Venetoclax as upfront therapy underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). On the other hand, after a longer follow-up period (143 days), 5 out of 38 patients (13.2%) received a HSCT after Venetoclax therapy among R/R patients. Median Overall Survival was not reached in the newly-onset cohort. In R/R setting, median OS was 253 days (95% C.I. 157-349). Interpretation These data extend to the real-life setting some previous evidence obtained from trials. In particular, our data confirm that venetoclax plus HMAs or LDAC has an acceptable toxicity profile and is safe and manageable. However, especially in the R/R setting, hematological toxicity represents the most frequent adverse event, arising some concerns about the optimal drugs management. Although our data suggest a similar clinical activity of venetoclax combinations to that reported in clinical trials, further studies from the real-life setting are highly warranted to confirm venetoclax efficacy under normal clinical practice. GG and JN equally contributed CP and AC equally contributed Disclosures Boccadoro: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cavo:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; bms: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Papayannidis:Shire: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax is not approved to treat Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Italy

Download Full-text