scholarly journals Dose Escalation Study of GCC19CART CoupledCAR ® Technology for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Colorectal Cancer

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4841-4841
Author(s):  
Naifei Chen ◽  
Chengfei Pu ◽  
Lingling Zhao ◽  
Chang Wang ◽  
Ruihong Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Cellular Therapeutics

Abstract Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown remarkable clinical efficacy in hematologic malignancies but limited success in solid tumors. GCC19CART, the first clinical candidate from the CoupledCAR ® solid tumor platform, targets guanylate cyclase-C (GCC) which is expressed in colorectal cancers. A Phase 1 investigator-initiated dose escalation trial is underway in China for patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Data presented here are from a single participating institution. Methods: Subjects with relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer are screened for GCC expression, with 70% to 80% of subjects expected to demonstrate GCC per historical data. Subjects undergo leukapheresis, a single dose of lymphodepleting chemotherapy (fludarabine 30mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 300mg/m2) 3 days prior to infusion, and then administration of a single infusion of GCC19CART at one of three doses of 1x10 6, 2x10 6, or 3x10 6 cells/kg. Endpoints are safety and preliminary evidence of efficacy as determined by CT or PET/CT per RECIST1.1 or PERCIST 1.0. Results: 5 subjects have been enrolled to dose level 1 (1x10 6 cells/kg) and 5 subjects have been enrolled to dose level 2 (2x10 6 cells/kg) and have a 1-month post-infusion imaging study available for review. The most common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in 10/10 subjects (Grade 1 9/10 (90%) or Grade 2 1/10 (10%)) and diarrhea in 10/10 subjects (Grade 1 3/10 (30%) Grade 2 1/10 (10%) Grade 3 6/10 (60%)). Neurotoxicity was observed in 1/10 (10%) subjects at Grade 4 and resolved with corticosteroids. The combined overall response rate (ORR) for both dose levels was 50% (5/10). For dose level 1, the overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 was 40% (2/5). Two subjects demonstrated a partial response (PR) while an additional subject had partial metabolic response (PMR) on PET/CT with stable disease (SD) per RECIST 1.1. For dose level 2, The ORR per RECIST 1.1 was 60% (3/5). 3 subjects demonstrated a PR (2 at month 1, 1 at month 3 after being SD at month 1) and an additional subject had PMR on PET/CT with SD per RECIST 1.1. Conclusions: GCC19CART demonstrated meaningful clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. This trial is ongoing and updated data will be presented. A United States based Phase 1 trial of GCC19CART is anticipated for early 2022. Disclosures Pu: Innovative Cellular Therapeutics: Current Employment. Zhu: Innovative Cellular Therapeutics: Current Employment. Huang: https://www.accme.org/accreditation-rules/standards-for-integrity-independence-accredited-ce/eligibility: Current Employment. Tang: Innovative Cellular Therapeutics: Current Employment. Jia: Innovative Cellular Therapeutics: Current Employment. Chen: Innovative Cellular Therapeutics: Current Employment. Kennedy: Innovative Cellular Therapeutics: Current Employment. Wu: Innovative Cellular Therapeutics: Current Employment. Xiao: Innovative Cellular Therapeutics: Current Employment.

scholarly journals ACTR-63. PHASE I DOSE ESCALATION STUDY OF PROCASPASE ACTIVATING COMPOUND-1 (PAC-1) IN COMBINATION WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT ANAPLASTIC ASTROCYTOMA OR GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi28-vi28
Author(s):  
Matthias Holdhoff ◽  
Martin Nicholas ◽  
Richard Peterson ◽  
Oana Danciu ◽  
Stefania Maraka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Anaplastic Astrocytoma ◽  
Caspase 3 ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract BACKGROUND Procaspase activating compound -1 (PAC-1) is a small molecule that catalyzes conversion of procaspase-3 to caspase-3 which induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Glioblastoma (GBM) is among the tumors with high concentrations of procaspase-3 and low levels of caspase-3. PAC-1 crosses the blood brain barrier and has been shown to synergize with temozolomide (TMZ) in canine malignant glioma and meningioma that arise spontaneously. METHODS This is a multicenter phase 1 dose-escalation study to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PAC-1 administered days 1–21 in combination with TMZ days 8–12 at a dose of 150 mg/m2 of each 28 day cycle in subjects with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or GBM. A modified Fibonacci 3 + 3 design is used with up to 4 dose levels of PAC-1 (375, 500, 625 and 750 mg/day). Neurologic toxicity, including cognitive function, is closely monitored throughout the trial. INTERIM DATA: A total of 14 subjects have been enrolled to-date. Of these, 7 at dose level 1, PAC-1 375 mg/day (6 GBM, 1 AA; median age 58y, range 25–75) and 7 at dose level 2, PAC-1 500 mg/day (5 GBM, 2 AA; median age 51y, range 35–60). Best responses to-date were 2 subjects with a partial response and 2 with stable disease. Grade 3 (hepatotoxicity) and 4 (cerebral edema) was reported as possibly related to PAC-1 in 1 patient at dose level 1. The median number of cycles received was 4 (range, 1–12+) at dose level 1 and 2 (range, 1–3) at dose level 2. Enrollment to dose level 2 has been completed and data analysis is ongoing. Updated response and toxicity as well as pharmacokinetic data will be presented.

Cyclosporine Modulation of Multidrug Resistance in Combination with Pravastatin, Mitoxantrone, and Etoposide for Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): A Phase 1/2 Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4343-4343
Author(s):  
Tara L Chen ◽  
Elihu H. Estey ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Kelda M. Gardner ◽  
Lauren Markle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Multidrug Resistance ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract Abstract 4343 Background: Outcomes in relapsed/refractory AML are dismal. Given the high prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR), many clinical studies have tested whether MDR reversal agents such as cyclosporine (CSA) could increase the efficacy of conventional chemotherapeutics but results have been inconsistent. More recently, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (e.g. pravastatin) have been investigated after demonstration that cholesterol synthesis inhibition can restore chemosensitivity of AML cells in vitro. As studies further suggested the HMG-CoA inhibitors could downregulate MDR function, we attempted to improve the efficacy of mitoxantrone and etoposide in patients with relapsed/persistent AML by combining CSA and pravastatin in a single-arm, open-label phase 1/2 trial. Patients and Methods: Adult patients with relapsed/refractory non-APL AML and a treatment-related mortality score of <9.2 (Walter et al. J Clin Oncol 2011) were eligible if they had an ECOG performance status (PS) ≤3 and adequate organ function. Prior hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was permissible if relapse occurred >180 days post-HCT. Planned treatment included induction and consolidation therapy with pravastatin, CSA, and increasing doses of mitoxantrone and etoposide. All patients received pravastatin 320mg PO every 6 hours on days 1–10. The starting dose level (level 1) used etoposide 60mg/m2/day and mitoxantrone 5mg/m2/day via continuous infusion on days 5–9. CSA started 6 hours before the first doses of mitoxantrone/etoposide; after loading with 6mg/kg over 2 hours and 4mg/kg over 6 hours, CSA was infused at 18mg/kg/day on days 5–9. CSA levels were monitored on Day 6 and 8 to maintain levels <2,400ng/mL (by LCMS-MS). At dose level 2, identical doses of pravastatin and CSA were combined with etoposide (80mg/m2/day) and mitoxantrone (6mg/m2/day). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as: 1) any Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours except of febrile neutropenia (FN), infection, or hyperbilirubinemia; and 2) any Grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity except FN/infection, constitutional symptoms if recovery to Grade ≤2 within 14 days, and hyperbilirubinemia. An “adaptive” Bayesian phase 1–2 design that monitored both toxicity and response was used. The maximal acceptable rate of toxicity was 30%, the minimum acceptable rate of efficacy 20% (historical rate of 15% in this population), stopping when posterior probability >90%. A maximum of 45 patients would be treated in cohorts of 3. Results: Between October 2010 and February 2012, 10 patients (median age 52 [range 40–58] years) were treated, including 4 patients (all at dose level 1) who received therapy off protocol. Two patients had secondary AML, and 6 had complex cytogenetics. PS was 1 (7 patients) or 2 (3 patients). Average TRM score was 4.32 for on-study patients. All patients had received at least 2 prior regimens, and 7 received 3 prior therapies. One patient had undergone HCT. The average CSA level on Day 6 was 1,366.3ng/mL (range 713–2,082ng/mL) and 1,199.8ng/mL on Day 8 (range 526–1,593ng/mL). Efficacy (CR or CRi)/DLTs for on-study patients were: level 1 (n=3): 0/1 (grade 4 acute kidney injury); level 2 (n=3): 0/2 (grade 4 acute kidney injury; sepsis/multiorgan failure). Among the 7 patients treated at level 1, other toxicities included septic shock (n=1), FN (4), mucositis (2), and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (1). One off-study patient achieved CR after 1 course and received 1 cycle of consolidation with pravastatin, etoposide, and mitoxantrone but experienced CNS relapse after CR duration of only 46 days. Based on the results of the on-study patients, the statistical monitoring mandated early study closure for lack of efficacy & excessive toxicity. Conclusion: In the targeted, heavily pretreated patient population, the study regimen was excessively toxic and failed to achieve acceptable efficacy. Further clinical testing, if any, should be limited to less heavily pretreated, otherwise “fit” patients with AML. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01342887. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Docetaxel and capecitabine for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13579-13579
Author(s):  
T. E. O’Brien ◽  
E. Newton ◽  
J. Trey ◽  
E. Crum
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Human Colon Cancer ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

13579 Background: Docetaxel (D) induces human colon cancer cell lines to upregulate thymidine phosphorylase, an enzyme which activates capecitabine (C) to its cytotoxic form. This provided rationale for adding low dose D to C in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Although this combination has been established in metastatic breast cancer, it has not been evaluated in CRC. Because of concerns of toxicity in a pretreated population, we performed a phase I trial in patients with previously treated CRC. Methods: Eligibility: At least 1 prior treatment for metastatic disease; ECOG PS 0–1; adequate organ function. Design: Phase I, dose escalation. D, IV, days 1 & 8, and C, PO BID days 5–18, repeated q21days. Dose Level 1: D=15mg/m2, C=1000mg/m2; Level 2: D= 15 mg/m2, C= 1100 mg/m2; Level 3: D= 20 mg/m2, C= 1100 mg/m2; Level 4: D=20mg/m2, C=1250mg/m2. Results: 13 patients have thus far been treated. 11 are evaluable for toxicity and 10 for response (1 at dose level 4 was taken off study due to non-compliance before completion of cycle 1; another died of progressive cancer before completing cycle 1 at dose level 4; another is evaluable for toxicity but not yet for response). 9 with colon, 4 with rectal primary sites. Median follow-up= 5 mo (1–19 mo). Med age= 59 (30–75); #prior regimens for met disease 1–2, all of which were 5-FU based. Toxicities No dose limiting toxicities (DLT) until Dose Level 4. Dose Level 1: 1/3 developed grade 2 diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome and delayed grade 3 hand-foot; Dose Level 2: 2/3 developed grade 2 toxicities (hand-foot in one and diarrhea in the other); Dose Level 3: 1/3 developed delayed grade 2 hand-foot; Dose Level 4: 1 patient with delayed grade 2 hand-foot and grade 1 eye tearing; another developed DLT (grade 4 stomatitis/dehydration). Response 6/10 patients progressed after 2 cycles; 2 pts had stable disease, one lasting 4.6 mo; 2 patients had a partial response, one of which lasted 9 mo. The latter case had refractory disease to FOLFOX 4 but a 78% reduction in her liver metastases to D+C. Conclusions: The combination of low dose docetaxel, used as chemosensitizing agent, with capecitabine in this pretreated group of patients with metastatic CRC appears to be well tolerated, with no DLTs seen until Dose Level 4, and has modest activity. MTD determination awaits further accrual. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Romidepsin in Combination with ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin and Etoposide) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1748-1748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dai Chihara ◽  
Yasuhiro Oki ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Emily Wesson ◽  
Charnelle Ruben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract Background: Despite recent approval of 4 new drugs for relapsed PTCL, an unmet need remains for new therapies. Survival of relapsed/refractory PTCL patients is improved by stem cell transplant particularly if patients are in CR prior to transplant (Smith 2013). ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide) is commonly used salvage regimen which produces CR rates ranging from 7% to 23% in patients with PTCL (Zelenetz 2003, Mikesch 2013). Romidepsin is a HDAC inhibitor which showed overall response rate of 25% with CR rate of 15% in a large phase II trial for relapsed/refractory PTCL (Coiffier 2012). To further improve outcomes particularly in CR rates pre-transplant, we conducted a phase I study of romidepsin in combination with standard ICE in patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL. Methods: The primary objective of this trial is to determine the toxicity profile and to identify the maximum tolerated dose of the romidepsin in combination with standard ICE. A statistical design of modified toxicity probability interval method was used (Ji 2010). Romidepsin was administered intravenously on days 1 and 4 of ICE, at 8mg/m2 (dose level 1), 10mg/m2 (level 2), or 12mg/m2 (level 3). All patients received G-CSF support. Patients could receive next cycle of treatment on day 14 if ANC was > 1 and platelets were ≥ 75,000 with ≥ 20,000 allowed if patients had bone marrow involvement with PTCL at time of enrollment. Results: As the time of the data cut off (August 2014), a total of 9 patients were registered (4 PTCL-NOS, 4 AITL, 1 NK/TCL) and 7 were assessable for toxicity and response (Cheson 2007). Two patients were consented but did not received treatment. Median age of patients was 60 (range 59-70) years, 5 patients had primary refractory disease and 5 patients had advanced stage disease at the time of enrollment. Median number of prior regimens was 1 (range 1-2) and 1 patient had received a prior front-line consolidative ASCT. At the time of data cut off a total of 7 patients were treated with 2, 4 and 1 patients respectively at dose level 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Median number of treatment cycles were 2 (range 1-4). The common non-hematologic toxicity of grade 3/4 was fatigue (71%), nausea (43%), shortness of breath (29%), and vomiting (14%). With a total of 15 cycles overall given, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 87% and 40% of the cycles and febrile neutropenia occurred once in 1 patient. Dose limiting toxicities occurred in a 70 year-old female treated at dose level 2 with renal failure which was considered to be associated with ifosfamide and etoposide and in 67 year-old male with bone marrow involvement who previously had a front-line consolidative ASCT 6 months earlier and was treated at dose level 3 with persistent grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. The overall response rate was 71% (5/7, 95%CI: 22-96%) with all in CR. Two patients who received dose level 1 underwent allogeneic transplant and one patient in dose level 2 underwent autologous stem cell transplant but all patients relapsed after transplant. Median duration of response was 7.2 months and six of the 7 patients experienced further disease progression. Summary: In conclusion, romidepsin plus ICE is an effective salvage regimen but with a higher rate of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia as anticipated than with romidepsin or ICE alone. Even though romidepsin plus ICE produces a high CR rate, early relapse despite this even when followed by transplant indicates the crucial need to develop methods to detect minimal residual disease and approaches to best address this. Enrollment continues to this trial. Disclosures Fanale: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding.

A Phase 1 Trial of Vorinostat and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin In Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2816-2816
Author(s):  
Frederick Lansigan ◽  
Stuart Seropian ◽  
Dennis L. Cooper ◽  
Von Potter ◽  
Noelle Sowers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Refractory Lymphoma ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract Abstract 2816 Background: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with activity in lymphoma and leukemia. Vorinostat has been reported to act synergistically with topoisomeraseII inhibitors such as anthracyclines (Ac) by facilitating an open chromatin configuration thus enhancing double-strand DNA breaks and apoptosis. We conducted a phase 1 study of escalating doses of vorinostat with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (V+PLD) in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Other endpoints included safety, tolerability, and activity of V+PLD. Methods: Patients age ≥18 years with relapsed or refractory lymphoma were enrolled sequentially into 1 of 3 dosing levels using a standard 3+3 design for up to 8 cycles. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, good clinical practice and regulatory guidelines. Vorinostat 200 (dose level 1), 300 (dose level 2), or 400mg (dose level 3) twice daily on days 1–7 and PLD 30mg/m2 on day 3 of a 21-day cycle were administered to eligible and consenting patients. CTCAE v.3.0 was used to determine toxicities, and the revised criteria for malignant lymphoma were used to determine response. Results: 14 patients have been enrolled; 2 men and 12 women; median age 69 years [range 27–88]; median prior therapies (4) [1-11]; prior Ac (13); median prior Ac dose (300mg/m2) [108-440mg/m2]; prior HDACi (1); Dose level 1 (7); Dose level 2 (4); Dose level 3 (3). Lymphoma subtypes included: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL)(4), peripheral T-cell lymphoma (3), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)(5), grey zone lymphoma (1), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (1). Median number of study cycles was two [1-8](2). Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities included: neutropenia (3) and thrombocytopenia (1). Grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included: fatigue (2), nausea (1), anorexia (1), dehydration (1), AST/ALT elevation (1), amylase/lipase elevation (1). No cardiac toxicities were observed. There was one death attributed to disease progression. Partial responses (PR) were documented in two HL patients, stable disease (SD) in one HL and one DLBCL patient. Three patients continued therapy beyond 2 cycles. One HL patient with a PR tolerated 8 cycles despite a prior anthracycline dose of 350mg/m2 and 9 prior systemic treatments including ABVD, ICE, GND, DICEP, BEAM and autologous stem cell transplant, Gem and C-MOPP. Another HL patient with a PR after 2 cycles is currently on cycle 3 at dose level 3 and had 5 prior treatments including autologous transplant. One other HL patient with SD discontinued therapy after 2 cycles to proceed with alternative chemotherapy including allogeneic stem cell transplant. One patient with cutaneous DLBCL obtained a skin response but had overall stable disease and completed 6 cycles before disease progression; prior treatment included R-CHOP, R-ICE, CEPP, and GemOx. In addition, one patient with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma had a clinical response after 1 cycle but therapy was discontinued because of neutropenia and her disease progressed. Conclusions: The combination of V+PLD is well tolerated even among older and heavily pretreated patients. There were no cardiac toxicities even in patients heavily pretreated with anthracyclines. The MTD has not been reached and enrollment to dose level 3 is ongoing. Disease control was achieved in 4 of 14 patients (2 PR and 2 SD). Of interest, 3 of 4 patients with HL achieved disease control (2 PR and one SD), and treatment with vorinostat in combination with anthracycline-based therapy warrants further investigation in HL. Disclosures: Lansigan: Merck: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Vorinostat in combination with pegylated doxorubicin is considered experimental in lymphoma. Foss:Merck: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Study of MDR1 Inhibitor Plus Brentuximab Vedotin in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1636-1636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Chen ◽  
Lu Chen ◽  
Alex F. Herrera ◽  
Matthew Mei ◽  
Katrina McBride ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract Background: Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an antibody drug conjugate (ADC), selectively delivers anti-tubulin agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) to CD 30+ cells. In a multi-center phase II trial in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), BV showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 75%, a complete response (CR) rate of 34%, and a median duration of response (DOR) of 6.7 months (Younes A et al, JCO 2012). Although this drug has high response rates in HL, many patients will eventually develop resistance. We have shown that resistance to BV is associated with upregulation of MDR1 (multidrug resistance pump), and BV resistance cells have a decreased intracellular concentration of MMAE as a result of overexpression of drug export pump (Chen et al, MCT 2015). Cyclosporine (CsA), an immunosuppressant, can inhibit drug export pump by competitive binding. It has been combined with non-targeted chemotherapy to overcome drug resistance in the past without significant benefits. However, it has never been combined with targeted therapies such as antibody drug conjugates. We found that addition of CsA to BV restores intracellular MMAE concentration in BV resistant cell lines and restores the IC50 to BV (Chen ASH 2017). In BV resistant mouse xenograft models, addition of CsA also restores BV sensitivity (Chen ASH 2017). We hypothesize that the combination of CsA and BV is safe and efficacious, thus we designed and conducted a phase I trial using the combination of CsA plus brentuximab vedotin in patients with R/R HL. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective, phase I trial with a 3 + 3 design in patients with relapsed/refractory HL. All patients had biopsy proven relapsed/refractory HL. Three dose levels are planned: 1) 1.2 mg/kg BV every 21 days and 5 mg/kg CsA PO BID on D 1-5, 2) 1.8 mg/kg BV every 21 days and 5 mg/kg CsA PO BID on D 1-5. 3) 1.8 mg/kg BV every 21 days and 7.5 mg/kg of CsA PO BID on D 1-5. DLT period is 21 days. Patients who were relapsed/refractory to BV were allowed. The primary endpoint was MTD. Secondary endpoints were safety, ORR, duration of response, and correlative analysis. Imaging studies were performed every two cycles with alternating CT and CT/PET scans. Response criteria were per Lugano 2014. Results: Thirteen patients were accrued, and all were evaluable for toxicity and 12/13 for efficacy. The baseline characteristics are shown in table 1 and include: previous BV (100%), previous PD1 inhibitor (92%), previous HCT (62%), male predominance (54%), Caucasian predominance (85%), median age of 37, stage III/IV (69%), refractory to previous BV (92%), progressed after PD1 blockade (92%). There was 0 DLT at dose level 1 (0/3), 1 DLT of abdominal pain (grade 3) and neutropenia at dose level 2 in the same patient (1/6 patients), and 4 DLT in 2 out of 3 patients treated at dose level 3. The DLTs were grade 3 hyperglycemia (1), grade 3 bone pain (1), grade 3 constipation (1), and grade 4 lymphopenia (1). Thus dose level 2 is the MTD. Grade 3 or higher possibly-related toxicities (excluding DLT) included neturopenia (6) anemia (4), lymphopenia (3), hyponatremia (3), hypophosphatemia (3), acidosis (1), pneumonitis (1), abdominal pain (1), colitis (1), AST elevation (1), weight loss (1), and hypokalemia (1). Grade II possibly related toxicities >20% included hypertension (46%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (31%), hypophosphatemia (31%), hypokalemia (31%), fatigue (31%), ALT increase (23%), elevated bili (23%), and myalgia (23%). Patients treated at the MTD experienced grade 3/4 possibly-related toxicities that were mainly laboratory based which included: neutropenia (4), anemia (2), hypophosphatemia (2), hypophosphatemia (1), hyponatremia (1), AST elevation (1), lymphopenia (1), abdominal pain (1), and colitis (1). The best overall response (CR+PR) rate was 67%, CR rate was 33%, PR 33%, stable disease rate was 25%, 1 patient was inevaluable. The best overall response rate for patients treated at dose level 1 and 2 was 67% with a CR of 44%. Median number of cycles was 4 (1-14). 2 patients went to autoHCT and 2 patients went to alloHCT after protocol. Conclusion: Addition of CsA to BV is safe and feasible at the MTD. The MTD was determined to be 1.8 mg/kg BV every 21 days plus 5 mg/kg of CsA PO BID on D 1-5. The ORR of 67% and CR of 33 % is very encouraging in a primary BV refractory population. The study has opened the expansion phase. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Chen: Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck & Co., Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech Inc.: Consultancy; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Herrera:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; KiTE Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding. Siddiqi:Juno Therapeutics: Other: Steering committee. Forman:Mustang Therapeutics: Other: Licensing Agreement, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Phase 1 Trial of Sorafenib and Everolimus In Patients with Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2802-2802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Luis F Porrata ◽  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
Joseph P Colgan ◽  
Betsy LaPlant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract Abstract 2802 Background: Redundancy of pro-survival signaling pathways promotes survival and drug resistance in lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies. In particular, the PI3K-Akt and the MEK-ERK pathways have been shown to play an important role in the proliferation and survival of these malignant cells induced by various cytokines in the tumor microenvironment. Sorafenib, a Raf kinase and VEGF receptor inhibitor, and everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, have synergistic cytotoxicity in myeloma and lymphoma cells due to inhibition of multiple signaling pathways. Methods: We designed a Phase 1/2 clinical trial to identify the maximum tolerated doses of the two drugs used in combination and the efficacy of the combination. Patients (Pts) with relapsed myeloma or lymphoma were eligible for enrollment. Pts were required to have an absolute neutrophil count ≥1500 × 10(6)/L, a platelet count ≥75,000, and a serum creatinine 21.5 mg/dL. The study utilized the classic 3+3 design. Extensive pharmacokinetic studies were performed to better delineate potential drug interactions. Results: Twenty-six pts were accrued from August 2007 to February 2009. Four pts discontinued sorafenib during cycle 1 for various reasons (2 patient refusal, 1 unrelated medical condition and 1 physician discretion) and were excluded from MTD determination. An additional pt did not have measurable disease and was ineligible, leaving 19 pts with lymphoma (including 6 with Hodgkin lymphoma) and 2 with myeloma for phase I analysis. The pts had a median age of 56 years (range, 22, 69) and were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). Eighteen (86%) had received a prior stem cell transplant. Four dose limiting toxicities were seen across all dose levels (Table). These included grade 3 vomiting (level 1), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (level 2 and 3, one each) and grade 2 hand and foot rash leading to treatment delay (level 3). Overall, 13 pts experienced a grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 19%, 43%, and 38% of pts, respectively. Four pts have experienced a grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity; no grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities were seen. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included hypokalemia, weight loss, vomiting, hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, and elevated alkaline phosphatase. Dose level 1 (sorafenib 200 mg and everolimus 5 mg daily) was best tolerated and was selected for phase 2 evaluation. The ORR was 33% (7/21;95% CI: 15–57%, Table) with 3 pts at dose level 0 (2 PR, 1 CR), one at level 2 (1 PR) and three at level 3 (2 PR, 1 CR) responding. The responders included 5 pts with Hodgkin's disease and one each with an NK cell and T-cell lymphoma. Pts have received a median of 6 cycles (range: 1–19) of treatment. 16 pts have discontinued treatment due to disease progression (13 pts), non-resolution of cytopenias (1 pt), physician discretion (1 pt), and death on study due to lymphoma (1 pt). Disease progression has been seen in 16 pts; 9 pts have died. Median follow-up for pts still alive is 18.7 months (range: 11.5–29.4). 6 pts died from disease progression, one each due to sepsis unlikely related to treatment, cholecystitis, and unknown causes. Sorafenib is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 CYP3A enzyme and RAD-001 mainly by the CYP3A4 system in the liver, hence there is a potential for interactions. The detailed PK analyses performed as part of this trial showed a decrease in the RAD001 levels following initiation of sorafenib on day 8 of cycle 1 (Figure). Conclusion: The combination of sorafenib and everolimus is safe at a recommended phase 2 dose of sorafenib 200 mg and everolimus 5 mg daily. There is no significant drug interaction seen. Activity has been observed, especially in the setting of Hodgkins Disease. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma. Witzig:Novartis and Celgene: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding, Served on advisory boards with Novartis and Celgene – both uncompensated with compensation to Mayo Clinic.

Multicenter phase I/II trial of BBI608 and pembrolizumab combination in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (SCOOP Study): EPOC1503.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 760-760
Author(s):  
Akihito Kawazoe ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Tomohiro Nishina ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Paired Samples ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Biomarker Research ◽  
Level 2

760 Background: The anti–programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibody, pembrolizumab provided an objective response rate (ORR) of 40% in patients (pts) with Mismatch Repair–Deficient (dMMR) or Microsatellite Instability–High (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) vs 0% in pts with MMR-proficient/Microsatellite Stable (MSS) mCRC. The WNT/β-catenin signaling has been reported to prevent anti-tumor immunity and promote resistance of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. This study investigates efficacy and safety of the combination of BBI608, which blocks phosphorylated STAT3 and downregulates WNT/β-catenin signaling, with pembrolizumab in pts with mCRC (both MSS and MSI-H). Here, we present the results of the phase I part. Methods: Phase I part was designed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in a “3+3” cohort-based dose escalation design of BBI608 (240mg BID every day on level 1 and 480mg BID every day on level 2) with pembrolizumab (200mg/body q3w). We also conduct biomarker research using paired samples from repeated tumor biopsies and blood collections. Results: Five pts were enrolled in level 1, and 3 pts in level 2. All pts were MSS mCRC. Seven pts were included in the safety analyses. Two pts in level 1 were excluded from dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation because of disease progression during DLT evaluation period. No DLTs were observed at either level. Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were not observed. Grade 1 or 2 TRAEs included diarrhea related to BBI608 (57%), hyperthyroidism (14%), hypothyroidism (14%), and fever (14%) without unexpected safety signals. One patient in level 2 showed a tumor shrinkage lasting more than 12 weeks for lung and lymph node metastases with remarkable decline of CEA level. Analysis of repeated tumor samples from this case demonstrated that CD8+ T-cells infiltration inside the tumor on treatment was observed by immunohistochemistry and flow-cytometry. Conclusions: BBI608 480mg BID with pembrolizumab was tolerable and determined as RP2D. This combination showed a hint of activity and might evoke immunity in MSS mCRC, which will be confirmed by ongoing phase II part. Clinical trial information: NCT02851004..

Phase I trial of regorafenib, hydroxychloroquine, and entinostat in metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15580-e15580
Author(s):  
Timothy J Brown ◽  
Thomas Benjamin Karasic ◽  
Charles John Schneider ◽  
Ursina R. Teitelbaum ◽  
Kim Anna Reiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Dose Levels

e15580 Background: The antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib provides a survival benefit in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Antiangiogenic therapy causes hypoxic stress within tumor cells, which activate autophagy as a survival mechanism. Entinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, increases dependence on autophagy through epigenetic mechanisms. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blocks autophagy by blunting lysosomal acidification and is synergistic with antiangiogenic therapies. We hypothesized that HCQ and entinostat would be tolerable with regorafenib and potentiate the antitumor response. Methods: This was a 3+3 phase I trial to find the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of HCQ and entinostat with regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. No prior regorafenib or HDAC inhibitor therapy was permitted. Regorafenib was dosed at 160mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles, with provision to lower the starting dose to 80mg if toxicity was excessive. Entinostat was dosed at 3mg weekly in dose level 1 and at 5mg weekly in dose levels 2 and 3 while HCQ was dosed at 200mg qAM and 400mg qPM in dose levels 1 and 2 and at 600mg BID at dose level 3. Expansion was planned at the RP2D with a primary endpoint of objective response rate. Results: Twenty-eight patients were screened, and 20 patients were enrolled from November 2017 to January 2020. Six patients were treated at dose level 1 with no dose-limiting toxicity. The starting regorafenib dose was reduced to 80mg after 3 patients discontinued therapy early due to fatigue or rash due to regorafenib. At dose level 2, 7 patients were enrolled to achieve 6 evaluable patients. One DLT (G3 fatigue) was noted and one patient withdrew consent after 14 days due to fever and tumor pain flare possibly related to treatment. Six patients enrolled at dose level 3; no DLTs were seen. One additional patient received HCQ 400mg BID instead of 600mg BID due to a clerical error. Weight loss (60%), fatigue (50%), and anorexia (50%) were the most common toxicities. Thirteen grade 3 toxicities were noted, with rash (15%), fatigue (10%), and alkaline phosphatase elevation (10%) the most common. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Seven patients discontinued therapy early due to toxicity. Nearly all patients experienced rapid weight loss, with a range of 1.5 lbs to 27.1 lbs and a median weight loss of 9.5 lbs at two weeks. No objective responses were observed. The median PFS was 1.8 months, the median OS was 5.2 months, and no patient remained on study longer than 4 months. Expansion was not pursued due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. Conclusions: The combination of regorafenib, HCQ, and entinostat was poorly tolerated without evident activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. The substantial weight loss suggests a potential adverse metabolic interaction between these drugs. Clinical trial information: NCT03215264.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Results of Anti-PD-Ligand 1 (Durvalumab) & Lenalidomide in Patients with Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma and Correlation with Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Gene Expression Profile

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 20-20
Author(s):  
Christiane Querfeld ◽  
Ni-Chun Tsai ◽  
Joycelynne Palmer ◽  
Xochiquetzal U. Martinez ◽  
Farah Abdulla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Gene Expression Profile ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Expression Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

Background:T cells in CTCL are functionally exhausted and are characterized by the expression of immune inhibitory molecules such as PD1 and PD-L1 (Cancer Immunol Res 6; 2018). These findings justify the evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibition to reverse T cell exhaustion in CTCL. We initiated a phase 1/2 clinical trial of lenalidomide and durvalumab (NCT03011814) to determine the safety and efficacy of this regimen. Durvalumab is a human monoclonal antibody with high affinity and selectivity for PD-L1, targeting exhausted T cells and distinct cells within their environment. Lenalidomide, an oral immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and analog of thalidomide, has previously shown activity in CTCL (Blood 123; 2014). Durvalumab may restore an anti-tumor immune response, and the combination of durvalumab and lenalidomide may enhance immune checkpoint blockade-induced immune responses. Associations between immune checkpoints, gene expression profile and the clinical efficacy of durvalumab/ lenalidomide combination were evaluated. The primary objectives were to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide in combination with durvalumab and safety with primary endpoint of toxicity (using CTCAE 4.03). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and median duration. Relationships between gene expression profile (GEP), PD-L1 expression, and antitumor activity were exploratory end points. Methods:Phase 1 portion to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the durvalumab and lenalidomide combination has completed enrollment. Pts were enrolled in sequential cohorts to receive durvalumab (fixed dose at 1500 mg) and dose escalation of lenalidomide (dose level 1 = 10 mg for all cycles; dose level 2 = 10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for all subsequent cycles; dose level 3 =10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for cycle 2, and 20 mg for all subsequent cycles) to characterize safety, efficacy and antitumor activity. Serial skin samples were collected to assess the impact on the tumor microenvironment and anti-tumor activity. Results:Thirteen pts. were evaluable for toxicities and 12 patients evaluable for response. 10 males/3 females, median age 36 (29-72 y), with aggressive or refractory/advanced CTCL, clinical stages IB (2), IIA (3), IIB (6), IIIA (1), and aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ CTCL (1) and a median of prior systemic treatments of 3 (range, 2-8) have been enrolled. Dose level 1 (n=3), dose level 2 (n= 3), dose level 3 (n=4). Median follow up time was 16.1 months (range, 3.7-36.1) months. No serious AEs or DLTs were observed during the DLT evaluation period (cycles 1-3). The most frequently reported AEs were fatigue (n=8), skin pain (n=4), chills (n=3), anemia (n=3), and leukopenia (4). One grade 3 maculopapular rash (possibly due to lenalidomide) was observed, all other treatment-related AEs were grade 1/2 in severity. One patient discontinued treatment due to fatigue. Three patients developed grade 1/2 autoimmune thyroiditis that resolved with treatment. Median cycles of treatment were 7 (range, 1-28). Median duration of response was 6 (range, 1- 28+) months. Nine pts achieved PR, 2 pts maintained stable disease and 2 pts developed PD. Five pts remain on treatment. Gene expression levels for several checkpoints (PD1, PD-L1 & ICOS) (Cycle1 Day1 vs Cycle 2 Day15) were analyzed. Gene expression profile highlights downregulation of TNF-alpha signaling via NFkB, IFN-gamma, and PI3-AKT-mTOR signaling pathways in responders; up-regulation of MYC targets, IL2-, JAK-STAT and pro-inflammatory pathways were seen in PD compared to responders. Conclusions:Anti-PD-L1/lenalidomide has significant clinical activity in refractory/advanced CTCL, which will be formally evaluated in the Phase 2 portion. Responses were durable and ongoing, and treatment was well tolerated. Dose escalation is up to maximum dose of 20 mg lenalidomide daily. Our preliminary results reveal adaptive and innate immune signatures that may be predictive of response to checkpoint blockade and yield insights into mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. Disclosures Querfeld: MiRagen:Consultancy;Stemline:Consultancy;Trillium:Consultancy;Celgene:Research Funding;Kyowa Kirin:Consultancy;Helsinn:Consultancy;Bioniz:Consultancy.Abdulla:Johnson Johnson:Research Funding;Mallinckrodt:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.Rosen:Seattle Genetics:Consultancy;NeoGenomics:Consultancy;Aileron Therapeutics:Consultancy;Novartis:Consultancy;Pebromene:Consultancy;Celgene:Speakers Bureau;paradigm Medical Communications:Speakers Bureau;Abbvie:Speakers Bureau.Zain:Mundi Pharma:Research Funding;Seattle Genetics:Research Funding;Kyowa Kirin:Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document