scholarly journals VIP152 Is a Novel CDK9 Inhibitor with Efficacy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 270-270
Author(s):  
Steven Sher ◽  
Larry Beaver ◽  
Katie Williams ◽  
Shelley Orwick ◽  
Brandi R. Walker ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is a genetically heterogeneous disease characterized by clonal expansion of B-lymphocytes that induce secondary immune suppression. CLL is now treated with inhibitors of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and BCL2. Virtually all patients respond to therapy, however resistance to these therapies has been described justifying the need for novel CLL therapies. Broad inhibition of cyclin dependent kinases (CDK) and associated alternative target enzymes with agents such as flavopiridol or dinaciclib have demonstrated significant clinical activity in CLL but are hindered by a relatively narrow therapeutic window. VIP152 is a highly specific inhibitor of CDK9 - considered the most important CDK kinase member for CLL clinical activity. VIP152 has favorable pharmacokinetic properties and has demonstrated durable, preliminary single-agent clinical activity in double-hit diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Herein, we report the efficacy of VIP152 preclinically in CLL. Methods: On-target activity of VIP152 was measured using a KinomeScan from DiscoveryRx at 100nM and 1000nM. Kinase profiling for VIP152 was performed on 6 kinases in a 10-dose assay at ReactionBio. Cell-based viability and proliferation assays (MTS, Annexin-V (AV), and propidium iodine (PI)) were performed in primary CLL cells and the CLL cell lines, HG3 and MEC1. Transcriptional activity after VIP152 exposure was measured via qPCR and limiting-cell RNA sequencing (lcRNAseq). Proteomic and immunoblot studies were performed to measure perturbations in CDK9 binding partners and on-target activity of VIP152. A genome-wide CRISPR/CAS9 knockout screen was performed to identify any synthetically lethal targets and pathways. Results: The KinomeScan identified CDK9 as the kinase with maximal inhibition upon VIP152 treatment and no other CDKs were identified at 100nM. Kinase profiling revealed the IC 50 of VIP152 was lowest for CDK9/Cyclin T1 and CDK9/Cyclin T2 with close similarity to dinaciclib and greater than 1 log superiority over KB-0742. Co-immunoprecipitation and proteomics experiments have identified a CDK9 specific mechanism of action relating to perturbations of CDK9 binding partners. Specifically, we showed that CDK9 nuclear immunoprecipitation resulted in decreased co-immunoprecipitation of 7SK RNA components (HEXIM1 & MEPCE) as well as decreased RNA Polymerase II (RNAP2). The decrease in RNAP2 CoIP was further seen via proteomics. A 2-hour exposure of VIP152 against HG3 and MEC1 demonstrated growth inhibition, with an IC 50 of 0.9814µM and 1.092µM respectively. Continuous exposure of the compound for 24 hours resulted in a statistically significant drop in relative viability of 30% across a 10-fold dose range (0.1µM to 1.0µM) as measured by AV/PI. Primary CLL cells (n=10) responded with similar dosing strategies with a 54% reduction in viability at 1µM; moreover, stromal cell co-culture experiments demonstrated VIP152's ability to induce cell death and overcome stromal protection with short exposure. Induction of apoptosis was observed with pro-caspase-3 and PARP cleavage on immunoblot. qPCR and immunoblot studies demonstrated a time dependence of phosphorylated serine 2 (pS2) RNAP2 decreases alongside diminishment of MYC and MCL1 mRNA and protein. pS2 was shown to decrease as early as 2 hours after VIP152 treatment with similar decreases in MCL1 and MYC at both the protein and mRNA levels. We identified several pathways which are disrupted following treatment via lcRNAseq, including TNFR1 and TNFR2 signaling as well as upregulation of autophagy signals. Finally, CRISPR screen identified several potentially synergistically lethal targets, including transcriptional co-activators, DNA binding proteins, and cell proliferation pathways. Validation of these is ongoing as is an in vivo study of VIP152 in a CLL mouse model. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate VIP152 to be a highly selective and potent CDK9 inhibitor that disrupts the CDK9 nuclear complex and mediates significant preclinical activity against CLL cell lines and primary CLL cells. VIP152 also demonstrates predictable and new pharmacodynamic markers to assess target engagement. Collectively, these data support the recently initiated CLL clinical trial (NCT04978779). Disclosures Johnson: Vincerx: Current Employment; Janssen: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Frigault: Vincerx Pharma Inc: Current Employment; AstraZeneca: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months, Ended employment in the past 24 months, Patents & Royalties. Greer: Gilead: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Vincerx Pharma Inc: Current Employment. Hamdy: Vincerx Pharma Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta Pharma Inc: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Ended employment in the past 24 months, Patents & Royalties. Izumi: Acerta Pharma Inc: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Ended employment in the past 24 months, Patents & Royalties; Vincerx Pharma Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hwang: Vincerx Pharma Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Blachly: KITE: Consultancy, Honoraria; INNATE: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Byrd: Vincerx Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Trillium, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Newave: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3736-3736
Author(s):  
Jeff P. Sharman ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
Catherine C. Coombs ◽  
Marisa Hill ◽  
Denise Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors (BTKi) have transformed the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), but these treatments are not curative and many patients will require additional treatment. Covalent BTKi share pharmacologic liabilities (e.g. low oral bioavailability, short half-life) that collectively may lead to suboptimal BTK target coverage especially in rapidly proliferating tumors with high BTK protein turnover such as accelerating CLL/SLL, ultimately manifesting as acquired resistance in some patients. To address these limitations, pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, non-covalent BTKi that inhibits both wild type (WT) and C481-mutated BTK with equal low nM potency was developed. In the phase 1/2 BRUIN study, pirtobrutinib achieved pharmacokinetic exposures that exceeded its BTK IC96 at trough, was well tolerated and demonstrated promising efficacy in CLL/SLL patients regardless of prior therapy, number of prior lines of therapy, or BTK C481 mutation status (Mato et al. Lancet 2021;397,10277:892-901). The purpose of this randomized phase 3 study is to demonstrate the superiority of continued BTK pathway inhibition with pirtobrutinib compared to other available therapies in patients with BTKi-treated CLL/SLL. Study Design and Methods: BRUIN CLL-321 is a randomized, open-label, global phase 3 study comparing pirtobrutinib monotherapy versus investigator's choice of idelalisib plus rituximab or bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with CLL/SLL who have been treated with a prior covalent BTKi. Prior therapy with venetoclax is permitted. Approximately 250 patients will be randomized 1:1. Randomization will be stratified by 17p deletion (yes/no) and prior venetoclax (yes/no). Patients receiving investigator's choice are eligible to crossover to pirtobrutinib monotherapy if they experience progressive disease per iwCLL 2018 (determined by IRC). Eligible patients are adults aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of CLL/SLL who require therapy per iwCLL 2018 criteria and who have received prior covalent BTKi. Unlimited number of lines of prior therapy are allowed. Key exclusion criteria include CNS involvement by CLL/SLL, Richter transformation any time pre-enrollment, a major bleeding event on prior covalent BTKi and history of allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) or autologous SCT or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy within 60 days of randomization. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) per iwCLL assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), safety and tolerability, and patient reported outcomes. The global study is currently enrolling patients (NCT04666038). Disclosures Sharman: BeiGene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy; Centessa: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy. Jurczak: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Celtrion, Celgene, Debbiopharm, Epizyme, Incyte, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Merck, Mei Pharma, Morphosys, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Sandoz, Roche,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Coombs: LOXO: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; MEI Pharma: Honoraria. Hill: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment. Wang: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment. Ku: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Guntur: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shahda: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Leow: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ghia: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/Juno/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; ArQule/MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding. Mato: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nurix: Research Funding; MSKCC: Current Employment; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Genmab: Research Funding; LOXO: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: DSMB, Research Funding; DTRM BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3846-3846
Author(s):  
Javier Pinilla Ibarz ◽  
Meixiao Long ◽  
John Lister ◽  
Jennifer A. Woyach ◽  
Friedrich Graf Finckenstein ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (ie, ibrutinib, acalabrutinib) are approved for treating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and can mediate durable responses in some patients; however, relapses are common, primarily due to acquired mutations in BTK enzyme and/or phospholipase C gamma 2 (Albitar F, et al. J Cancer. 2015;6[5]:409-411. Maddocks KJ, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1[1]:80-87. Woyach JA. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2016;14[5]:330-333. Woyach JA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370[24]:2286-2294.). Preclinical studies demonstrated successful generation and robust cytotoxicity of an autologous, non-genetically modified, polyclonal T-cell product (IOV-2001) from BTK-inhibitor-treated patients with CLL (Karyampudi L, et al. HemaSphere. 2019; 3[suppl 1; abstract PF447]), consisting of billions of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs). Compared with pre-ibrutinib and treatment-naïve PBLs, those derived from post-ibrutinib blood samples demonstrated higher-fold expansion from peripheral blood and produced higher levels of IFNγ in response to non-specific T-cell receptor stimulation. Methods IOV-CLL-01 (NCT04155710) is an ongoing, first-in-patient, Phase 1/2, open-label, multi-cohort, dose-finding study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IOV-2001 in patients with CLL/SLL who are progressing or have progressed on ibrutinib or acalabrutinib treatment. PBLs are generated by T-cell expansion from 50 mL of the patient's blood in a 9-day manufacturing process at a centralized GMP facility. The PBL product is then cryopreserved and sent back to the treatment center for infusion into the patient. Treatment consists of a preparative regimen of lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide IV 500 mg/m 2 and fludarabine IV 30 mg/m 2) for 3 days, followed by 2 days of rest, a single infusion of IOV-2001, and 6 doses of either low-dose (9 MIU SC) or high-dose (600,000 IU/kg IV) interleukin-2 (IL-2; Figure 1). Approximately 1 to 5 clinical sites in North America will treat ~39 to 70 patients across 4 cohorts in 2 phases (Table 1). The primary endpoint for Phase 1 (Cohorts 1a and 1b) is to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of IOV-2001 followed by IL-2, and for Phase 2 (Cohorts 2 and 3) is to evaluate efficacy of the RP2D of IOV-2001 followed by IL-2, as measured by objective response rate per investigator assessment. Patients ages ≥18 years, diagnosed with CLL/SLL with radiographically measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and meeting prior therapy criteria according to Table 2 are eligible for inclusion. Four US sites are currently active and enrolling patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pinilla Ibarz: Sellas: Other: ), patents/royalties/other intellectual property; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Takeda: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, TG Therapeutics, Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory; MEI, Sunesis: Research Funding. Lister: Oncology Analytics: Other: Academic Board. Woyach: Gilead Sciences Inc: Other: Data & Safety; AbbVie Inc, ArQule Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Janssen Biotech Inc, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company,: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc, ArQule Inc, Janssen Biotech Inc, AstraZeneca, Beigene: Other: Advisory Committee; AbbVie Inc, Loxo Oncology Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly & Company: Research Funding. Graf Finckenstein: Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Jagasia: Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Samakoglu: Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Yadav: Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Li: Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Byrd: Novartis, Trillium, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Newave: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vincerx Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3803-3803
Author(s):  
Sudeep Karve ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Veronica Gonzalez De La Calle ◽  
Silvia Mangiacavalli ◽  
Chang-Ki Min ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) commonly encompasses combination of drugs within the three drug classes including proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulators and (IMiDs), and monoclonal antibodies, both for newly diagnosed and relapsed disease. With increasing appreciation of disease heterogeneity based on underlying genetic abnormality, and demonstration of efficacy of venetoclax in patients with t(11;14) MM, the outcomes with commonly used MM regimens among the different cytogenetic subgroups are of great interest. Venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, is being studied in t(11;14) positive MM patients who have received at least two prior lines of treatment (NCT03539744; CANOVA). However, outcomes in previously treated t(11;14) MM patients using standard of care approaches in the real-world setting is limited. Patients and methods: This non-interventional, retrospective observational cohort study included patients with t(11;14) MM from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) retrospective study of t(11;14) MM. From the overall cohort, patients with t(11;14) MM receiving pomalidomide + dexamethasone (PomDex) in ≥3 rd line were selected, similar to those being enrolled in the ongoing CANOVA trial. Patients were also required to have prior exposure to lenalidomide and a PI without a history of transplant within 16 weeks prior to PomDex initiation. Patients enrolled in a clinical trial were excluded. Overall best response, time to next therapy (TTNT) as a surrogate measure for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed after initiation of PomDex. All analyses were descriptive in nature and were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Results: Fifty-two patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Median age was 63 years, 60% were male. Patients had a median of 3 prior lines at start of PomDex, at a median of 4.3 years from diagnosis; 52% had a prior transplant. A PR or better was observed in 34% of patients with PomDex. The median TTNT for this cohort was 6.1 months and median OS was 19.2 months. Conclusion: This retrospective study of non-trial patients with t(11;14) MM provides a benchmark for newer therapies in this patient population for comparison with both venetoclax dexamethasone in the ongoing CANOVA study as well as combinations using the pomalidomide backbone. Disclosures Karve: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kumar: Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Carsgen: Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Tenebio: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Gonzalez De La Calle: Celgene-BMS, Janssen, Amgen: Honoraria. Mangiacavalli: GSK: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Kastritis: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Esteves: AbbVie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Delforge: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee: Karyopharm: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Arriola: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Ross: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Manthena: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Durie: Amgen, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: fees from non-CME/CE services .


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4997-4997
Author(s):  
Surbhi Shah ◽  
Shuchi Gulati ◽  
Ang Li ◽  
Julie Fu ◽  
Vaibhav Kumar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : Patients (pts) with COVID-19 are reported to have increased risk of venous thromboembolism yet bleeding has been an under recognized complication. Rates of bleeding remain unexamined in all patients especially in pts with cancer and COVID-19. Aim: To estimate the incidence of bleeding complication in patients with cancer and COVID 19 Methods: The CCC19 international registry (NCT04354701) aims to investigate complications of COVID-19 in pts with cancer. Our aim was to investigate the frequency of bleeding in hospitalized adult pts with cancer andCOVID-19, enrolled between March 16, 2020 and Feb 8, 2021. The incidence of bleeding complications was captured as defined by CCC19 and included both major and non major bleeding . Associated baseline clinic-pathologic prognostic factors and outcomes such as need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality rates were assessed Results :3849 pts met analysis inclusion criteria. Bleeding was reported in 276 (7%) pts with median age of 70years; incidence was 6.6 % in females and 7.6 % in males, 6.5% in non-Hispanic white pts, 8.2 % in non-Hispanic Black pts, and 7.8 % in Hispanic pts. 74% had solid cancer and 29% had hematologic malignancies, 33% had received anti-cancer therapy in preceding 30 days, and 8% had surgery within 4weeks. In pts taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications at baseline, 7.2% developed bleeding. Need for mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, 30-day mortality, and total mortality were significantly higher in those with bleeding complications compared to those without, p<0.05 Conclusion : We describe the incidence of bleeding in a large cohort of pts with cancer and COVID-19. Bleeding events were observed in those with adverse outcomes including mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and high mortality; the overall mortality of 43% in patients with bleeding complications is especially notable. This important complication may reflect underlying COVID-19 pathophysiology as well as iatrogenic causes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kumar: Diagnostica Stago: Honoraria. Zon: AMAGMA AND RLZ: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Byeff: Pfizer, BMS, Takeda,Teva, Merck, United health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Nagaraj: Novartis: Research Funding. Hwang: astrazaneca,Merck,bayer, Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. McKay: Myovant: Consultancy; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Calithera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dendreon: Consultancy; Caris: Other: Serves as a molecular tumor board ; Vividion: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bayer: Research Funding. Warner: Westat, Hemonc.org: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Connors: Pfizer: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Alnylam: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria; Abbott: Consultancy. Rosovsky: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Inari: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1930-1930
Author(s):  
Gaurav Goyal ◽  
Krystal W. Lau ◽  
Xiaoliang Wang ◽  
Amy J. Davidoff ◽  
Scott F. Huntington ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic reduction of in-person medical care in the general population; however, impacts have not been well-characterized for patients with hematologic malignancies. This study assessed the impact of COVID-19 on healthcare delivery for patients with hematologic malignancies with documented active treatment. Methods: Patients from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database with confirmed diagnosis of AML, DLBCL, FL, MCL, CLL or MM, and age ≥ 18 years at initial diagnosis were included. To be included in the study, documented receipt of at least one systemic, non-maintenance line of therapy between March 1, 2016 - February 28, 2021 was required. Patients were categorized into treatment types within lines of therapy: Oral therapy (OralTx); outpatient infusions (OutPtTx); and inpatient infusions, including hematopoietic transplants and CAR-T cell therapy (InPtTx). Monthly visit rates were calculated as the number of visits (telemedicine or in-person [in-clinic treatment administration, vitals, and/or labs]) per active patient per 30-day standardized month. Only visits occurring within a line of therapy were included (i.e. during active therapy, excluding surveillance). Telemedicine was only available for abstraction during the pandemic period. We used time-series forecasting methods on pre-pandemic monthly visit rate data (March 2016 - February 2020) to estimate projected counterfactual visit rates between March 2020 - February 2021 (expected in-person visit rates if the pandemic had not occurred) for all diseases combined, each disease, and each treatment type. Differences between projected and actual monthly visit rates during the pandemic period were considered statistically significant and related to the pandemic if the actual visit rate was outside of the 95% prediction interval (PI) surrounding the projected estimate. Results: A total of 22,559 patients were included in this analysis (6,241 OralTx, 14,501 OutPtTx, 7,675 InPtTx): 4,069 AML, 3,641 DLBCL, 2,004 FL, 1,899 MCL, 4,574 CLL and 6,701 MM. There was a gradual downward trend in in-person visit rates across all diseases over the study period (March 2016 - February 2021, Figure) and general visit frequencies were lower for OralTx and higher for OutPtTx and InPtTx overall. For all diseases combined, early pandemic months (March - May 2020) saw an 18% (95% PI 8.9% - 25%) reduction in in-person visit rates averaged across OralTx and OutPtTx, with the projected rate being 1.5 (95% PI 1.3 - 1.6) visits per patient per month, compared to an actual rate of 1.2. Reductions in the in-person visit rates were significant for all 3 treatment types for MM, for OralTx for CLL, and for OutPtTx for MCL and CLL. Telemedicine visit rates were greatest for patients who received OralTx, followed by OutPtTx, then InPtTx, with greater use in the early pandemic months and subsequent decrease in later months. All in-person visit rates increased close to predicted rates in the later half of the pandemic period. Conclusions: In treatment of hematologic malignancies, overall documented in-person visit rates for patients on OralTx and OutPtTx significantly decreased during early pandemic months, but returned close to the projected rates later in the pandemic. There were no significant reductions in the overall in-person visit rate for patients on InPtTx. Variability in these trends by disease type was observed, with significant reductions in in-person visits impacting MM, CLL, and MCL. Figure. Visit rates over time according to treatment category Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lau: Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment. Wang: Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Flatiron Health: Current Employment. Davidoff: AbbVie: Other: Family member consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Huntington: Bayer: Honoraria; Thyme Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Flatiron Health Inc.: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; SeaGen: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; DTRM Biopharm: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Calip: Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment. Shah: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding. Stephens: CSL Behring: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; JUNO: Research Funding; Mingsight: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Arqule: Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Miksad: Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Parikh: GNS Healthcare: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Onc.AI: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Humana: Honoraria, Research Funding; Nanology: Honoraria; Thyme Care: Honoraria; Flatiron Health Inc: Honoraria. Takvorian: Pfizer: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy. Neparidze: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Eidos Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Seymour: Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 11-12
Author(s):  
Mahmoud A.Z. Abdelaal ◽  
Dyala Abdelrahman ◽  
Mahir Cengiz ◽  
Hakan Yavuzer ◽  
Serap Yavuzer ◽  
...  

Background:The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a 3- to 9-fold higher age-adjusted mortality in African American and Hispanic populations, the major US racial groups affected by sickle cell disease (SCD). The Centers for Disease Control designates SCD as a condition at increased risk for severe COVID-19. An urgent need for repurposing of available and safe therapeutics has been cited for such high-risk populations until vaccines are widely available. L-glutamine (GLN) ameliorates clinical pathology of SCD related to elements of COVID-19. Multiple systemic complications of COVID-19 are increasingly attributed to oxidative damage, a target which GLN regulates. Prescription-grade L-glutamine (PGLG) (Endari®, Emmaus Medical) decreases oxidative stress by increasing the ratio of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) to total NAD, which may increase availability of reduced glutathione. PGLG also decreases red cell endothelial adhesion in patients with SCD. Of note, additional analysis of the phase 3 trial demonstrated a 63% lower occurrence of acute chest syndrome (ACS) in PGLG-treated SCD patients compared to control, which has important relevance in the pandemic. A recent report of two computational screens of FDA-approved therapeutics, directed to protein and chemistry targets and to gene expression changes induced by SARS-CoV-2, predicts glutathione and GLN are highly likely to confer benefit in COVID-19 (Kim, J Translat Med, 2020). Methods:We therefore reviewed reports of multi-system effects of GLN in experimental respiratory distress animal models and in ICU and COVID-19 patients. We focused on contributors to cytokine storm and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the leading causes of mortality in COVID-19 (Huang, Lancet, 2020). We also conducted a clinical trial in hospitalized COVID-19 patients on ESPEN-recommended nutrition +/- GLN. Results:In experimental ARDS, sepsis, and endotoxin-induced lung injury, GLN decreases consolidation, pulmonary edema, and neutrophil infiltration and increases lung compliance, oxygen saturation, heat shock protein activation, and survival by 2.5-fold over saline controls (Perng WC, Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2010; Singleton, Crit Care Med, 2005). Patients with severe COVID-19 have increased proinflammatory cytokines; interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels predict and contribute to severity of COVID-19 (Yuki, Clin Immunol, 2020). GLN modulates inflammatory responses by suppressing C-reactive protein, IL-6, and TNF-α release; it also reduces IL-6 in murine studies (37% decrease,p< 0.05; Chuang, BMC Pulm Med, 2014), which could benefit COVID-19 patients. Myocardial injury occurs in up to 12% of COVID-19 patients directly with viral entry through ACE-2 receptors, microvascular damage, endothelial shedding, and inflammation-mediated damage, which GLN protects against (Shi, Eur Heart J, 2020; Shi, JAMA Cardiol, 2020; Shao, Pak J Med Sci, 2015). Inflammatory states lead to GLN consumption and negative GLN balance (Santos, Amino Acids, 2019). Deficient plasma GLN (< 420 µmol/L) is a defined risk for higher mortality in ICU and COVID-19 patients (Shen, Cell, 2020). Glutathione deficiency contributes to SARS-CoV-2 oxidative lung damage and severe disease (Polonikov, ACS Infect Dis, 2020). In a recent clinical trial, patients were confirmed to have SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR, had positive CT scans, and were admitted from a COVID-19 clinic. Both arms received ESPEN-recommended nutrition for COVID-19 alone or with GLN (10 grams, 3 times/day; see Table). Conclusions:GLN and glutathione deficiency contribute to COVID-19 severity, and GLN has salutary biologic actions on reducing lung pathology, mediators of cytokine storm, and myocardial injury in animal models, SCD, and ICU patients. GLN reduces severity in standard risk COVID-19 patientsafterinfection has occurred. These findings, combined with computational prediction of GLN benefit vs. COVID-19, support the hypothesis that PGLG treatmentprior toSARS-CoV-2 infection mayreducethe development of severe COVID-19 in SCD and perhaps other high-risk populations. The data as a whole provides a strong rationale for a controlled clinical trial of PGLG toreducesevere COVID-19 in high-risk SCD patients and improve outcomes if infection occurs. Disclosures Cengiz: Biruni University Medical Faculty:Current Employment;Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty:Ended employment in the past 24 months.Yavuzer:Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics:Current Employment.Yavuzer:Biruni University Medical Faculty:Current Employment;Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Mediacl Faculty:Ended employment in the past 24 months.Tang:Kaiser Permanente:Current Employment.Ward:Emmaus Medical, Inc.:Current Employment.Goodrow:Emmaus Medical, Inc.:Current Employment;Emmaus Life Sciences Shareholder:Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Ludlum:Emmaus Life Sciences, Inc.:Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Stark:Emmaus Life Sciences Shareholder:Current equity holder in publicly-traded company;Emmaus Medical, Inc:Current Employment.Perrine:Cetya Inc.:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Phoenicia Bioscience:Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Phoenicia Therapeutics:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties;Boston University School of Medicine:Current Employment, Patents & Royalties;Viracta Therapeutics:Patents & Royalties.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1204-1204
Author(s):  
Bin Cai ◽  
Aaron N Nguyen ◽  
Songmao Zheng ◽  
Jianfeng Shi ◽  
Guizhong Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Recent clinical data illustrate the effectiveness of CD20xCD3 T cell engagers (TCEs) that redirect the patient's endogenous T cells to eliminate CD20-positive tumor cells. While several of these products have demonstrated promising clinical activities in B-cell malignancies, their potential therapeutic utility is limited by cytokine release syndrome (CRS), even after strategies such as step-up dosing are implemented. ADG152 is a novel CD20xCD3 TCE prodrug engineered using Adagene's SAFEbody technology to minimize or eliminate CRS and on-target/off-tumor toxicities. The anti-CD20 arm of ADG152 has been engineered for enhanced binding to CD20 compared to other clinical stage or approved antibodies, while its anti-CD3 arm has modulated affinity for CD3 and is also masked by a conditionally activable peptide. In normal tissues and in circulation, the masking moiety on the anti-CD3 arm can function to block the binding of ADG152 to T cells; however, in an activable condition such as the tumor microenvironment where protease activity has been reported to be elevated, the masked antibody can be activated, enabling the activated ADG152 to simultaneously engage T cells and neighboring CD20-expressing tumor cells. In vitro studies showed that ADG152 has enhanced binding to human B cells and CD20-positive Raji tumor cells compared with the benchmark CD20xCD3 TCE plamotamab. On the other hand, ADG152 has significantly reduced binding to the human CD3 δ/ε protein dimer and no binding to human CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of normal human donors. Consistent with these results, ADG152 shows significantly decreased ability (more than 100-fold) compared with the benchmark and the unmasked parental molecule to activate CD8+ T cells and to induce T cell-mediated killing in the presence of tumor cells in vitro. ADG152 demonstrated strong anti-tumor effects in vivo. In a human PBMC-engrafted Raji xenograft mouse tumor model, dosing with ADG152 resulted in almost complete tumor growth inhibition at 1.5 mg/kg. In exploratory toxicology studies in cynomolgus monkeys, ADG152 resulted in significantly less cytokine release in monkey blood compared with benchmark, giving ~100-fold safety margin for ADG152 for cytokine induction (Figure). In addition, ADG152 was as effective as the benchmark at inducing B cell depletion from peripheral blood of cynomolgus monkeys. In summary, the preclinical characterization of ADG152 demonstrates that our SAFEbody platform can be used to engineer safe and potent bispecific T cell engagers with increased therapeutic index by allowing for strong anti-tumor activities in mice at doses with minimal cytokine release in monkeys, thereby supporting its advancement to clinical development either as a single agent or in combination with other therapies for the treatment of CD20-expressing B cell malignancies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cai: Adagene Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Nguyen: Sparcbio, LLC: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Adagene Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zheng: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Adagene Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shi: Adagene Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Liu: Adagene Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Li: Adagene Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Du: Adagene Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Frankel: Cytovia Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Adagene Inc.: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bristol Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; IMV: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sutro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immunai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Minerva Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; RAPT Therapeutics: Consultancy; Syros: Consultancy. Luo: Adagene Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Xu: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Adagene Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1345-1345
Author(s):  
Peter Trask ◽  
Jaisson Bortolini ◽  
Shinya Rai ◽  
Antonio Salar ◽  
Miguel Canales ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who are on initial treatment, report low levels of symptoms and a higher quality of life index in contrast to patients who have relapsed (Pettengell et al. Ann Oncol 2008). In the immunochemotherapy era, effective and safe treatments should create minimal treatment-related symptoms, regardless of the underlying patient characteristics. In the GALLIUM study (NCT01332968), patients treated with obinutuzumab (G)-chemotherapy followed by G maintenance reported low levels of symptoms (Davies et al. Ann Hematol 2020). Short duration infusions (SDI) of treatments for patients with untreated, advanced FL may yield substantial time savings for patients, and free up healthcare resources. The GAZELLE study (NCT03817853) is a prospective open label, multicenter, single arm, Phase IV study, which evaluated the safety of G administered as a 90-minute (min) SDI infusion from Cycle 2 (C2) onwards in patients with previously untreated advanced FL. G SDI appears to be safe, with no Grade 3 infusion-related reactions (IRRs) reported in C2, and only one Grade 3 IRR reported in subsequent cycles (Canales et al. ASCO 2021). In this analysis, we report symptom levels and provider preference during G SDI administration. Methods: During the first cycle, patients received the first three infusions of G (1000mg) administered at the standard infusion rate on Days 1, 8, and 15. Patients who did not experience any Grade ≥3 IRRs during the first cycle received G as a SDI from C2 onwards. The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI: range 0 [not present) to 10 [worst]) was used to assess the severity of disease/treatment-related symptoms, and how symptoms interfere with aspects of the patient's daily living. It was completed on Day 1 of C1-6, at the end of induction, during maintenance, at the end of maintenance, and at the end of the study. Additional MDASI analyses were conducted based on patient risk groups (bulky disease, Ann Arbor staging, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, B-symptoms, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index). At any time point after C4 Day 1, study investigators (physicians and nurses) completed an evaluation composed of questions addressing their site's experience with regards to time saved, convenience and infusion preference after administration of SDI and standard infusion of G, across all patients enrolled in the study. Results: 110/113 patients received at least one SDI of G, as per protocol. Median age was 62 years, (range: 28-86 years) and 62% of patients had stage IV FL, 51% presented with B-symptoms at baseline, 45% with bulky disease and 45% were classified as high-risk FLIPI. Median baseline MDASI severity and interference scores were 0 or 1 for most symptoms. Interference scores did not meaningfully change over the course of treatment. Median MDASI scores (baseline or change over treatment), also did not differ by risk subgroups. Over 60% of providers reported that SDI of G would save at least 2 hours in infusion time per visit, with >65% saying it was much more convenient versus regular infusion. SDI was preferred by >95% of providers for reasons attributed to time savings and patient comfort. Conclusions: Untreated, advanced FL patients had no or mild symptom severity and interference at baseline regardless of risk group. These low levels were maintained during G SDI administration. Additionally, SDI administration was preferred by providers for the time it saved, convenience, and comfort for patients, suggesting that G SDI administration can be a beneficial treatment option for untreated, advanced FL patients by minimizing patient treatment burden with no impact on health-related quality of life. Disclosures Trask: Genentech: Current Employment; Genentech/Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bortolini: Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Rai: Janssen Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Ono Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau. Salar: Abbvie: Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; EusaPharma: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Hospital del Mar: Current Employment. Canales: Eusa Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; iQone: Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy; Sandoz: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Klingbiel: F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Parreira: Hoffmann la Roche: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria. Deraet: Hoffmann La Roche: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Vorozheikina: IQVIA: Current Employment. Hübel: Celgene: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; EUSA: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Buchholz: Scripps Health Care System: Current Employment; Roche (Navify software): Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nucleix LLC: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ultimate Opinions in Medicine LLC: Honoraria; Empyrean medical systems: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mirada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 14-16
Author(s):  
Matthew M Lei ◽  
Erica Tavares ◽  
Uvette Lou ◽  
Evan Buzgo ◽  
Noopur S. Raje ◽  
...  

Background Hypercalcemia (HC) is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma (MM) occurring in 20-30% of patients. This is often associated with renal dysfunction and both features are important myeloma defining events resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANKL, has been evaluated in the prevention of skeletal related events in patients with newly diagnosed MM, as well as the treatment of bisphosphonate-refractory HC of malignancy (HCM). Cases of denosumab for HCM in MM patients with renal dysfunction have been described. Both denosumab and IV bisphosphonates (IVB) represent treatment options for HC in MM. We describe a comparison of patients with MM with HC who received denosumab vs IVBs. Methods We retrospectively identified patients age ≥18 with a diagnosis of MM with HC (corrected serum calcium level [CSC] >10.5 mg/dL). Patients were included if they received either denosumab or IVB (zoledronic acid [ZA] or pamidronate), between April 2016 and June 2020. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as normalization of CSC to less than 10.5 mg/dL. Secondary endpoints included HC relapse (CSC >10.5 mg/dL) and safety. Hypocalcemia was graded per CTCAE v5. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined using KGIDO criteria. Patients were followed-up for 56 days. Bivariate analyses were performed. Results A total of 40 patients were included with 18 in the denosumab group and 22 in the IVB group, of whom 15 (68%) received ZA and 7 (32%) received pamidronate. Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. Patients with newly diagnosed MM composed 33% and 55% of the denosumab and IVB groups, respectively. All patients in the denosumab group received 120 mg except one who received 60 mg, while in the IVB group, dose reductions occurred in 5/15 patients who received ZA (median dose, 4 mg; range, 3.3-4) and 4/7 patients who received pamidronate (median dose, 60 mg; range, 30-90). Most patients received HC treatment as an inpatient (58% inpatient vs. 42% outpatient). A minority of patients had received IVBs in the past 90 days. The mean CSC was 12.5 mg/dL (standard deviation [SD], 1.40) and 13.3 mg/dL (SD, 2.39) in the denosumab and IVB groups, respectively. Baseline serum creatinine (SCr) was higher and creatinine clearance (CrCl) was lower in the denosumab group (median SCr, 2.06 vs. 1.24 mg/dL, p=0.048; median CrCl, 33 vs. 48 mL/min, p=0.048). The CR rate by day 3-4 was 92% and 94% in the denosumab and IVB groups, respectively (p=NS). HC relapse occurred in 2 (12%) and 6 (29%) patients in the denosumab and IVB groups, respectively (p=0.257). Incidence of grade 1 hypocalcemia was similar between groups; however, incidence of grade ≥2 hypocalcemia was higher in the denosumab group. Incidence of new AKI was 28% (5/18) in the denosumab group 23% (5/22) in the IVB group (p=0.71). No patients in the denosumab group received an additional dose of denosumab within 14 days of initial dose. Three patients in the IVB group received an additional dose of an IVB within 14 days of initial dose. One patient, who was in the denosumab group, had refractory hypercalcemia and had not achieved CR at day 56. Conclusions We describe our experience with denosumab and IVB for the management of HC in patients with MM. The CR rate at 3-4 days was similar with either agent in our MM only population that was not bisphosphonate refractory. A higher incidence of grade 2 hypocalcemia was noted in the denosumab group. Conclusions on renal safety are limited by the small sample size and that patients in the denosumab group had a higher SCr on presentation. Denosumab and IVB represent acceptable agents for the management of HC in MM patients with further investigation necessary in those with renal dysfunction. Disclosures Lei: Fresenius Kabi USA: Consultancy; Trapelo Health: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bristol Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Clovis Oncology: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Blueprint Medicines: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Lou:Fresenius Kabi USA: Consultancy. Raje:Bluebird, Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Immuneel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caribou: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Astrazeneca: Consultancy. Yee:Karyopharm: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Denosumab is indicated for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy refractory to bisphosphonate therapy. We describe the use of denosumab for hypercalcemia of malignancy in a multiple myeloma only patient population that is not bisphosphonate refractory. The use of denosumab for these patients was part of normal clinical practice in adherence to institutional policies and guidelines.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1864-1864
Author(s):  
Julie Kanter ◽  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
Patrick Leavey ◽  
David C. Shyr ◽  
Alexis A Thompson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a recessive monogenic disease caused by a single point mutation in which glutamic acid replaces valine in Codon 6 of the human beta-globin gene (HBB) leading to the production of abnormal globin chains (HbS) that polymerize and cause erythrocytes to sickle. This results in hemolytic anemia, vaso-occlusion and organ damage, which leads to lifelong complications and early mortality. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) is the only known cure for SCD, however, its use is limited by the lack of well-matched donors, need for immunosuppression, risk of graft versus host disease and graft rejection. GPH101 is an investigational, autologous, hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) drug product (DP) designed to correct the SCD mutation in the HBB gene ex vivo using a high fidelity Cas9 (CRISPR associated protein 9) paired with an AAV6 (adeno-associated virus type 6) delivery template, efficiently harnessing the natural homology directed repair (HDR) cellular pathway. This approach has the potential to restore normal adult hemoglobin (HbA) production while simultaneously reducing HbS levels. In preclinical studies, HBB gene correction in SCD donor HSCs resulted in ≥60% of gene-corrected alleles in vitro with minimal off-target effects. Gene corrected cells were successfully differentiated toward the erythroid lineage and produced ≥70% HbA in vitro. Long-term engraftment of gene-corrected HSCs was demonstrated in vivo, following transplant into immunodeficient mice, with multi-lineage allelic gene correction frequencies well above the predicted curative threshold of 20%, with potential of this approach to be equivalent or superior to allo-HSCT. In addition, HSC-based correction in an SCD mouse model led to stable adult hemoglobin production, increased erythrocyte lifespan and reduction in sickling morphology, demonstrating the therapeutic potential of this gene correction platform as a curative approach in SCD. Study Design and Methods CEDAR (NCT04819841) is a first-in-human, open-label, single-dose, multi-site Phase 1/2 clinical trial in participants with severe SCD designed to evaluate safety, efficacy and pharmacodynamics (PD) of GPH101. Approximately 15 adult (18-40 years) and adolescent (12-17 years) participants will be enrolled across 5 sites, with adolescent enrollment proceeding after a favorable assessment of adult safety data by a Safety Monitoring Committee. Participants must have a diagnosis of severe SCD (βS/βS), defined as ≥ 4 severe vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) in the 2 years prior and/or ≥ 2 episodes of acute chest syndrome (ACS), in 2 years prior with at least 1 episode in the past year. Participants on chronic transfusion therapy may be eligible if required VOC and ACS criteria are met in the 2 years prior to the initiation of transfusions. Key exclusion criteria include availability of a 10/10 human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donor, or prior receipt of HSCT or gene therapy. After eligibility confirmation including screening for pre-treatment cytogenetic abnormalities, participants will undergo plerixafor mobilization and apheresis, followed by CD34+ cell enrichment and cryopreservation, undertaken locally at each trial site before shipment to a centralized manufacturer for GPH101 production. After GPH101 release, participants will undergo eligibility reconfirmation prior to busulfan conditioning and DP infusion. Safety, efficacy and PD measurements will occur for 2 years post-infusion; a long-term follow up study will be offered to participants for an additional 13 years of monitoring. The primary endpoint for this study is safety, measured by the kinetics of HSC engraftment, transplant related mortality, overall survival and frequency and severity of adverse events. Secondary endpoints will explore efficacy and PD, including levels of globin expression as compared to baseline, gene correction rates, clinical manifestations of SCD (including VOC and ACS), laboratory parameters, complications and organ function. In addition, cerebral hemodynamics and oxygen delivery will be assessed by magnetic resonance techniques. Key exploratory endpoints include evaluation of patient-reported outcomes, erythrocyte function, on-target and off-target editing rates, and change from baseline in select SCD characteristics. Disclosures Kanter: Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Graphite Bio: Consultancy; GuidePoint Global: Honoraria; Fulcrum Tx: Consultancy. Thompson: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Graphite Bio: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding; Beam Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Porteus: Versant Ventures: Consultancy; CRISPR Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Allogene Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ziopharm: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Graphite Bio: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Intondi: Graphite Bio: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Global Blood Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Lahiri: Graphite Bio: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dever: Graphite Bio: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Petrusich: bluebird bio: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Graphite Bio: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lehrer-Graiwer: Global Blood Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Graphite Bio: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document