scholarly journals Dose Reductions Related to Adverse Effects in Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Treated with the BTK-Inhibitor Ibrutinib

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3529-3529
Author(s):  
Shayna Sarosiek ◽  
Joshua Gustine ◽  
Catherine A Flynn ◽  
Carly Leventoff ◽  
Timothy P White ◽  
...  

Abstract The BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib is the first FDA approved therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and produces overall response rates >90% and long-term disease control in both treatment naïve and previously treated patients. Despite the remarkable efficacy of ibrutinib, dose reduction is often required for intolerance. In this study, we analyzed those patients requiring a dose reduction and evaluated the time to dose reduction, the symptoms leading to dose reduction, the rate of improvement in symptoms after dose reduction, and the hematologic response at 12 months after dose reduction. 385 patients received treatment with ibrutinib in our clinic from May 2012 through October 2020. Their baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Starting dose for these patients was 560 mg (n=11); 420 mg (n=358); 280 (n=15); 140 mg (n=1). Approximately 1/3 of all patients were treatment naïve at the time ibrutinib was initiated. Anemia, constitutional symptoms, and symptomatic hyperviscosity (or risk of hyperviscosity) were the most common reasons for treatment initiation. Reasons for dose reduction are shown in Table 2. Ninety-five patients (25%) required at least one dose reduction of ibrutinib. Twenty-three patients (6%) required a second dose reduction. Of the patients requiring dose reductions, 1 patient started at 280 mg and reduced to 140 mg, 91 patients started ibrutinib at 420 mg (1 patient ultimately had dose reduction to 70 mg, 22 patients to 140 mg, and 68 patients to 280 mg), and three patients started ibrutinib at 560 mg in the setting of Bing-Neel syndrome (2 patients had dose reduction to 420 mg and 1 patient to 280 mg). Patients requiring a dose reduction had a median age of 71 years (range, 46-96) at the time of ibrutinib initiation versus 66 years (range, 40-93) for those not requiring a dose reduction (p<0.001). Forty-five patients (47%) of patients requiring dose reduction were female versus 98 (34%) not requiring dose reduction (p=0.017). Median time to first dose reduction was 7.3 months (range, 0.5-75) and median time to second dose reduction from initiation of ibrutinib was 23 months (range, 3-75). Of the 95 patients requiring a dose reduction, 40 patients (42% of all patients with dose reductions) had improvement in at least 1 of the medication side effects after the initial dose reduction. Twenty-two patients (23%) had complete resolution of adverse effects. Twenty-six patients (27%) had no change in symptoms and 10 of these patients required an additional dose reduction. After the second dose reduction, 5 patients had improvement or resolution in symptoms. Two patients had no adverse effects prior to dose reduction and medication was reduced simply due to drug interaction. Of the 48 patients with 1-year hematologic follow-up data available, 10 patients (21%) had improvement in hematologic response and 35 patients (73%) maintained their hematologic response despite dose reduction. Three patients (6%) had worsening of hematologic response after dose reduction. In conclusion, one quarter of WM patients in this series on ibrutinib required a dose reduction due to development of intolerable medication side effects. In the majority of these patients, adverse effects improved or resolved with dose reduction. Importantly, hematologic response remained stable or improved in most patients despite dose reduction. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Treon: BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lily: Research Funding; Abbvie/Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Castillo: Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Ariel Denson ◽  
Kristyn Y. DiSogra ◽  
Justin Arnall ◽  
Srinivasa R. Sanikommu ◽  
Nilay A. Shah ◽  
...  

Introduction Gleevec, Imatinib mesylate, is the first in class BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor initially approved to treat CML. In February 2016, generic imatinib products became available. As generic products are not required to offer comparative efficacy and safety data, differences may arise. Small reports have found no significant differences in response durability and tolerability in patients transitioned from Gleevec to generic imatinib. Further, lower cost of generic products often influence treatment decisions and patient compliance. We sought to evaluate response durability, tolerability, financial costs, and adherence in patients with chronic phase CML (cpCML) who switched from Gleevec to generic imatinib and newly diagnosed cpCML patients initiated on generic imatinib. Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective chart review of adult patients who received imatinib therapy for cpCML between June 1, 2015 to November 14, 2019. Patients who received ≥6 months of brand through the Specialty Pharmacy Service (SPS) at Atrium Health prior to switching to generic were included in Group 1 (Switch). Patients who initiated therapy with generic imatinib dispensed from SPS were included in Group 2 (New Start). Durability of response was described determined via peripheral blood BCR-ABL transcripts by PCR and reported major molecular response (MMR) after 12 months generic imatinib therapy. Additional factors characterizing the durability and tolerability of therapy included adverse effects due to drug, dose modifications, adherence rate, prescription cost per month, and frequency of switch between generic products. Results Of 298 patients assessed, 12 patients were evaluable. There were 7 Switch patients and 5 New Start patients. Figure 1. All 12 patients met WHO diagnostic cpCML criteria. No patients in either group had accelerated or blast phase CML, no patients received maintenance imatinib following allogeneic HCT. In the Switch Group, 4 patients (57%) achieved MMR after 12 months of generic therapy. Of the 3 patients that did not achieve MMR, 1 patient relocated prior to 12-month assessment, 1 patient was noted to be non-compliant, and 1 patient had several treatment delays and dose reductions due to toxicities. 1 New Start patient achieved MMR at 12 months. Of those not achieving MMR, 1 was started on a reduced dose (100 mg /day) due to renal dysfunction, 1 had a PDC of 49.10% due to treatment delays while receiving treatment for a different malignancy, and 2 patients had logarithmic decreases in BCR-ABL but had not crossed the MMR threshold after 12 months of therapy. 5 Switch patients (71.4%) reported at least 1 adverse effect related to therapy, 3 of these (42.9%) required dose reduction. The adverse effects requiring dose reductions in the New Start patients included thrombocytopenia (n=2) and myalgia (n=1). All New Start patients reported at least 1 adverse effect with none of these patients requiring a dose reduction. Cost stayed the same or was reduced for 85.7% of the Switch patients, 1 patient experienced a cost increase and did not have co-pay assistance, and 2 patients received copay assistance. Cost of generic therapy was <$10/month in 85.7% of the Switch and 80% of the New Start patients. No patients experienced disease progression and PDC was >90% after 12 months on generic therapy for 71.4% Switch patients and 80% New Start patients. Table 1. and Table 2. Conclusion Patients with cpCML switched from brand to generic imatinib and patients newly started on generic imatinib appear to have durable responses and tolerance to generic imatinib. Dose reductions and non-adherence may have contributed to inadequate disease control in patients not achieving MMR in both groups. Patients switched from brand to generic imatinib may develop new side effects necessitating dose reduction. Thrombocytopenia may be more common in patients switched from brand to generic imatinib. Adherence to brand and generic imatinib is high and medication is affordable with most patients paying <$10/month. Our study is limited by a small sample size and retrospective nature. Prospective large studies are needed to compare tolerability and durability differences between brand and generic imatinib and available imatinib generic products. Disclosures Knight: Foundation for Financial Planning: Research Funding. Ai:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Grunwald:Premier: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Premier: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Cardinal Health: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Cardinal Health: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cardinal Health: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Premier: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding. Avalos:Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Best Practice-Br Med J: Patents & Royalties: receives royalties from a coauthored article on evaluation of neutropenia. Copelan:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chojecki:Novartis: Other: Investigator Meeting Attendance; Incyte: Research Funding.


BMJ ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 341 (sep15 2) ◽  
pp. c4999-c4999

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Claire J. Wiggins ◽  
Susan Y. Chon

As aberrant Notch signaling has been linked to cancerous growth, Notch inhibitors represent a novel category of targeted oncological therapy. Notch pathways in tumor cells may contribute to proliferation or limit apoptosis and differentiation. Healthy skin differentiation and homeostasis are reliant on normal Notch expression, and disruption of this signaling has been implicated in dermatological conditions such as hidradenitis suppurativa, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and lichen planus. Here, we describe two cases of patients with cutaneous side effects from Notch inhibitor treatment for adenoid cyst carcinoma (ACC) and review the role of Notch signaling in skin disease. By illuminating connections between medication side effects and disease pathogenesis, our goal is to increase awareness of the cutaneous side effects of Notch inhibitor treatment.


2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Fawzi ◽  
Mohamed Yousry Abdel Mohsen ◽  
Abdel Hamid Hashem ◽  
Suaad Moussa ◽  
Elizabeth Coker ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackground: Adherence to treatment is a complex and poorly understood phenomenon. This study investigates the relationship between older depressed patients’ adherence to antidepressants and their beliefs about and knowledge of the medication.Methods: Assessment was undertaken of 108 outpatients over the age of 55 years diagnosed with depressive disorder and treated for at least four weeks with antidepressants. Adherence was assessed using two self-report measures: the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) and a Global Adherence Measure (GAM). Potential predictors of adherence investigated included sociodemographic, medication and illness variables. In addition, 33 carers were interviewed regarding general medication beliefs.Results: 56% of patients reported 80% or higher adherence on the GAM. Sociodemographic variables were not associated with adherence on the MARS. Specific beliefs about medicines, such as “my health depends on antidepressants” (necessity) and being less worried about becoming dependant on antidepressants (concern) were highly correlated with adherence. General beliefs about medicines causing harm or being overprescribed, experiencing medication side-effects and severity of depression also correlated with poor adherence. Linear regression with the MARS as the dependent variable explained 44.3% of the variance and showed adherence to be higher in subjects with healthy specific beliefs who received more information about antidepressants and worse with depression severity and autonomic side-effects.Conclusions: Our findings strongly support a role for specific beliefs about medicines in adherence. Challenging patients’ beliefs, providing information about treatment and discussing side-effects could improve adherence. Poor response to treatment and medication side-effects can indicate poor adherence and should be considered before switching medications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document