scholarly journals Retrospective Analysis of Minimal Residual Disease Testing By High Throughput Immunosequencing Versus High Sensitivity Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1625-1625
Author(s):  
Anwar Khan ◽  
Nagehan Pakasticali ◽  
Omar Fathalla ◽  
Taiga Nishihori ◽  
Mohammad O Hussaini
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Spearman Correlation ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Introduction: Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is one of the strongest predictors of outcome in multiple myeloma (MM). Until recently, the most commonly available method to detect MRD in clinical practice has been high sensitivity flow cytometry (FC) which can detect MRD with at 10 -5 sensitivity. In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become a viable method to assess the MRD in MM patients with a 10 -6 sensitivity. NGS appears to have some advantages over HC-FC by circumventing subjectivity of analysis. However, real-world comparison between these two methodologies in the literature is limited and is important to inform daily hematopathology and oncology ordering practices. Methods: We retrospectively identified all cases of MM with NGS MRD data from bone marrow specimens at the Moffitt Cancer Center and collated corresponding flow MRD data and clinical data (OS, patient demographics) electronically and via chart review. 10-color flow cytometry was performed on a Gallios System and analyzed on Kaluza (Beckman Coulter, IN). Two million events were collected on all cells. Validated lower limit of detection was at least 0.01%. Antibodies included CD28, CD81, CD56, CD138, CD319, CD20, CD19, CD117, CD38, CD45, CD27, CD200 (BD, Biolegend, Beckman Coulter). clonoSEQ ® (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA) testing was performed which uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and NGS to identify, characterize, and monitor clonotypes of immunoglobulin (Ig) IgH (V-J), IgH (D-J), IgK, and IgL receptor gene sequences, and translocated BCL1/IgH (J) and BCL2/IgH (J) sequences Statistical analysis was performed by Spearman correlation coefficient and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: 192 samples from 122 unique patients were identified that had both NGS and FC data performed on the same sample. FC+ values ranged from 1x10 -7 to 0.39. NGS+ values ranged from 2.3 x 10 -7 to 0.15. Spearman correlation coefficient showed moderate concordance between NGS and FC at r=0.67 (p<0.001). Six samples were positive by FC (mean tumor burden (MTB)= 0.0007) but missed by NGS; whereas 59 samples were positive by NGS (MTB= 0.002) but missed by flow cytometry. Two cases by FC were equivocal and these were both definitively designated as MRD+ by NGS. Overall survival was worse for MRD+ (by NGS or FC) vs MRD(-) (Figure 1). Conclusion: Our study confirms the importance of MRD detection in MM and shows the robust utility of NGS for MRD detection in routine hematopathology practice. While both FC and NGS are complementary given that each can potentially detect MRD missed by another method, the data supports the increased sensitivity of NGS over FC. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nishihori: Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Hussaini: Stemeline Therapeutics: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Retrospective Analysis of Minimal Residual Disease Testing By High Throughput Immunosequencing Versus High Sensitivity Flow Cytometry and qPCR in B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4476-4476
Author(s):  
Omar Fathalla ◽  
Anwar Khan ◽  
Nagehan Pakasticali ◽  
Bijal D. Shah ◽  
Mohammad O Hussaini
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Spearman Correlation ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Introduction: Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is one of the most powerful predictors of prognosis in patients with B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). Standard methods to detect MRD in ALL include high-resolution flow cytometry (FC) (sensitivity 10 -4 to 10 -5) and qPCR for Ph+ ALL (sensitivity 10 -5 to -6). More recently, high-throughput sequencing (NGS) has been leveraged to detect MRD (sensitivity 10 -6). Retrospective, non-clinical trial based real-world data comparing between these methodologies in the literature is limited to absent. We report our experience at a high-volume cancer center comparing NGS, qPCR, and FC. Methods: All cases of ALL with NGS MRD data at the Moffitt Cancer Center were identified. Corresponding FC, qPCR (p190 and p210) and clinical data were collected electronically and via chart review. 10-color flow cytometry was performed on a Gallios System and analyzed on Kaluza (Beckman Coulter, IN). 750,000 events were collected on all cells. Validated lower limit of detection was at least 0.01%. Antibodies included CD15, CD130, CD10, CD58, CD22, CD33, CD13, CD123, CD19, CD20, CD45, CD38, CD34, CD81, CD200 (BD, Biolegend, Beckman Coulter). Quantidex™ BCR-ABL IS Kit (RT qPCR) was used to quantify BCR-ABL (p190 and p210) and ABL transcripts in total RNA in patients with ALL on Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR instrument. The results were expressed by normalized BCR-ABL to ABL (control) ratio. clonoSEQ ® (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA) testing was performed which uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and NGS to identify, characterize, and monitor clonotypes of immunoglobulin (Ig) IgH (V-J), IgH (D-J), IgK, and IgL receptor gene sequences, and translocated BCL1/IgH (J) and BCL2/IgH (J) sequences. Statistical analysis was performed by Spearman correlation coefficient and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: 95 samples from 54 unique patients were identified that had both NGS and FC data. A subset of patients had qPCR data (n=31 samples). FC+ values ranged from 0.00004 to 0.75. NGS+ values ranged from 8.25E-08 to 0.49. Spearman correlation coefficient showed moderate concordance between NGS and FC at r=0.62 (p<0.001). Spearman correlation coefficient for qPCR vs Flow was r= 0.08 (p=0.68). Three samples were positive by FC (mean tumor burden (MTB= 0.002) but missed by NGS; whereas 31 samples were detected by NGS (MTB= 0.0016) that were missed by flow cytometry. By FC, 9 samples were equivocal of which 7 were definitively designated as MRD+ by NGS. There were 7 qPCR+/NGS- samples (MTB= 2.5 x 10 -5) and 6 qPCR-/NGS+ cases (MTB= 0.012). Overall survival was worse for MRD+ (by NGS, qPCR, or FC) vs MRD(-) (Figure 1). Conclusion: Our study confirms the importance of MRD detection in ALL and shows the robust utility of NGS for MRD detection in routine hematopathology practice. While qPCR, FC and NGS are complementary given that each can potentially detect MRD missed by another method, the data supports the increased sensitivity of NGS over FC. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Shah: Servier Genetics: Other; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acrotech/Spectrum: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Expenses; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Expenses, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Hussaini: Stemeline Therapeutics: Honoraria.

Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Final Results from the NCI Phase 2 Pilot Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4746-4746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ola Landgren ◽  
Mark Roschewski ◽  
Sham Mailankody ◽  
Mary Kwok ◽  
Elisabet E. Manasanch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract BACKGROUND: Early treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone delays progression and increases overall survival in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. The addition of the selective proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib to a lenalidomide and dexamethasone backbone has proven effective in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma; this combination may allow patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma to obtain deep and durable responses. METHODS: In this phase 2 pilot study, patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma received eight 28-day cycles of induction therapy with carfilzomib (at a dose of 20/36 mg per square meter on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16), lenalidomide (at a dose of 25 mg on days 1–21), and dexamethasone (at a dose of 10 or 20 mg on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23). Patients achieving stable disease or better after combination therapy received 2 years of maintenance therapy with lenalidomide. Minimal residual disease was assessed with multi-color flow cytometry, next-generation sequencing by the LymphoSIGHT method, and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Myeloma clonotypes were identified in genomic DNA obtained from CD138+ bone marrow cell lysate or cell-free bone marrow aspirate at baseline for each patient based on their high frequency within the B-cell repertoire. Per study protocol, minimal residual disease assessment by next-generation sequencing, multi-color flow cytometry and FDG-PET/CT was repeated when patients achieved a complete response or completed 8 cycles of induction treatment. A sample size of 12 evaluable patients was calculated as being minimally necessary based on the following probability calculations: If the true probability of a very good partial response was 20% or 50%, we calculated that there would be a 7.3% or 80.6% probability, respectively, if 5 or more patients exhibiting a very good partial response (VGPR). Thus, if 5 or more patients out of 12 achieved a very good partial response, there would be strong evidence that the true probability of a VGPR was 50% or more. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled. All 11 patients (100%) who completed 8 cycles of combination therapy obtained VGPR or better (primary end point). Minimal residual disease assessment by next-generation sequencing was performed on bone marrow supernatant to detect cell-free myeloma clonotypes, while flow cytometry analysis utilized bone marrow cells. Overall (N=12), 100% of patients achieved a complete response or better over the study period, including 11 patients (92%) negative for minimal residual disease based on multi-color flow cytometry. Based on next-generation sequencing, two of the 12 patients were positive for minimal residual disease in the bone marrow supernatant; one of these two patients was also positive for minimal residual disease based on multi-color flow cytometry in the bone marrow cells. Information regarding longitudinal minimal residual disease status will be available and presented at the meeting. Adverse events were manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone was associated with high rates of complete response and minimal residual disease negativity by multi-color flow cytometry, next-generation sequencing, and FDG-PET/CT in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. Disclosures Landgren: Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC), Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) Other. Off Label Use: Carfilzomib and lenalidomide for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma.

scholarly journals Validation of a Sensitive Flow Cytometry Assay to Assess Minimal Residual Disease of Multiple Myeloma Cells in Apheresis Product

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5646-5646
Author(s):  
Nicholas Jones ◽  
Josette William Ragheb ◽  
Brian Ngo ◽  
David Uyeji ◽  
Anselm L. Hii
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Patient Monitoring ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Flow Cytometry Assay ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract For treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), flow cytometry has become a widely used and valuable method for the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow. Use of an optimized single-tube, 10-color flow cytometry panel for assessment of MM MRD has shown to be beneficial in patient monitoring and has shown correlation to the acknowledged EuroFlow 8-color, 2-tube method. In order to further correlate levels of MM and relapse in patients, validation of a sensitive MM MRD assay that can be applied to testing for residual disease in apheresis product prior to autologous stem cell transplant, a standard treatment for patients with multiple myeloma. This approach can exhibit great value in patient monitoring and treatment. As new combination therapies are developed for treatment of multiple myeloma in concert with autologous stem cell transplantation, evaluation of MRD in apheresis will likely continue to grow in importance. The purpose of this study is to show the validation and sensitivity of a flow cytometry assay designed to detect Multiple Myeloma (MM) cells in G-CSF and other mobilized apheresis samples from human Multiple Myeloma patients. Using GSM-mobilized apheresis product, spiked with different levels of patient de-identified MM plasma cells, validation of a 10-color MM MRD panel can be evaluated, intended to mimic patient apheresis at varying levels of residual disease post treatment. As with any minimal residual disease assessment, a high number of events are required to ensure sensitivity and precision. Typically, acquisition of 3-5 x 107 events is required to ensure precision of MM MRD levels to 0.001%. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Real-World Experience with Minimal Residual Disease Testing with Next Generation Flow Cytometry and Functional Imaging in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
David Böckle ◽  
Paula Tabares Gaviria ◽  
Xiang Zhou ◽  
Janin Messerschmidt ◽  
Lukas Scheller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Functional Imaging ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Focal Lesions ◽  
High Risk Disease ◽  
Minimal Residual

Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) diagnostics in multiple myeloma (MM) are gaining increasing importance to determine response depth beyond complete remission (CR) since novel agents have shown to induce high rates of deep clinical responses. Moreover, recent reports indicated combining functional imaging with next generation flow cytometry (NGF) could be beneficial in predicting clinical outcome. This applies in particular to the subset of patients suffering from relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who tend to show a higher incidence of residual focal lesions despite serological response. Here, we report our institutions experience with implementing both functional imaging and NGF-guided MRD diagnostics in clinical practice. Methods: Our study included patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and RRMM achieving VGPR, CR or sCR. Bone marrow aspirates were obtained for MRD-testing according to IMWG 2016 criteria. Samples were collected between July 2019 and July 2020 and analyzed with NGF (according to EuroFlowTM guidelines) at a sensitivity level of 10-5. Results were compared to functional imaging obtained with positron emission tomography (PET) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). High-risk disease was defined as presence of deletion 17p, translocation (14;16) or (4;14). Results: We included 66 patients with NDMM (n=39) and RRMM (n=27) who achieved VGPR or better. In patients with RRMM the median number of treatment lines was 2 (range 2-11). Fifteen patients suffered from high-risk disease. Median age at NGF diagnostics was 64 years (range 31-83). Among patients achieving VGPR (n=27), CR (n=10) and sCR (n=29) seventeen (26%) were MRD-negative by NGF testing. CR or better was significantly associated NGF MRD-negativity (p=0.04). Notably, rates of NGF MRD-negativity were similar among patients with NDMM (28%) and RRMM (26%). Even some heavily pretreated patients who underwent ≥ 4 lines of therapy achieved MRD-negativity on NGF (2 of 9). Functional imaging was performed in 46 (70%) patients with DW-MRI (n=22) and PET (n=26). Median time between NGF and imaging assessment was 2 days (range 0-147). Combining results from imaging and NGF, 12 out of 46 (26%) patients were MRD-negative with both methods (neg/neg). Three patients displayed disease activity as measured with both, imaging and NGF (pos/pos). Twenty-nine of the remaining patients were MRD-positive only according to NGF (pos/neg), while two patients were positive on imaging only (neg/pos). More patients demonstrated combined MRD-negativity on NGF and imaging (neg/neg) in the NDMM setting than in RRMM (32% versus 19%). We also observed that 30% of the patients with high-risk genetics showed MRD-negativity on both imaging and NGF. Of note, none of the patients with very advanced disease (≥4 previous lines) was MRD-negative on both techniques. Conclusion In the clinical routine, MRD diagnostics could be used to tailor maintenance and consolidation approaches for patients achieving deep responses by traditional IMWG criteria. Our real-world experience highlights that MRD-negativity can be achieved in patients suffering from high-risk disease and also in late treatment lines, supporting its value as endpoint for clinical trials. However, our data also support MRD diagnostics to be combined with functional imaging at least in the RRMM setting to rule out residual focal lesions. Future studies using MRD for clinical decision-making are highly warranted. Disclosures Einsele: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rasche:Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Skyline Dx: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria.

Novel Leukemia Associated Immunophenotype (LAIP) Absent from Normal and Regenerating Bone Marrow Identified by Multiparameter 6-Color Flow Cytometry.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2362-2362
Author(s):  
Denis Guyotat ◽  
Daniela Olaru ◽  
Pascale Flandrin ◽  
Nathalie Nadal ◽  
Lydia Campos
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blast Cells ◽  
Disease Study ◽  
New Generation ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Flow cytometry analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is based on the detection of aberrant phenotypes responsible for the relapse. Until now, all studies were performed by 3 or 4 color immunostaining, allowing the identification of LAIP in 80% of cases. Moreover, no data is available regarding the existence of such phenotypes in regenerating bone marrow. The new generation of cytometers allows the study of 8 parameters that permit a better distinction of malignant from normal phenotypes. In our study we analyzed 20 bone marrow samples from allogeneic donors, 20 ALL regenerating bone marrows after chemotherapy and 53 AML samples at diagnosis. Multiparameter 4 colour and 6 colour flow cytometry was used in order to define antigen combinations which are totally absent or present at very minimal levels in normal and regenerating hematopoiesis. “Blast cells” were gated according to CD45/SSC properties.For the first time we describe by 6 color flow cytometry 47 phenotypes totally absent from “blasts” gate in all normal bone marrow (ex: CD34+DR−117+33−15+, CD34+38+33−56+19−, CD14−DR+4+11B+64+). Another 41 phenotypes were identified as presents at a frequency < 0,05% of total cells (ex: CD34+DR+117−33+15+, CD14−DR+4+11B+64−, CD34+65−56+4−16−). There was no significant difference between normal and regenerating marrows. The 4 color panel of moAbs allowed us to identify only 30 phenotypes presents at a frequency < 0,05% of total cells (ex: CD34+33−13+, CD34+117+11b+, CD34+DR−13+). 53 AML at diagnosis were studied using 6 color immunophenotyping and 58 % of phenotypes described as aberrant or infrequent in normal myeloid hematopoiesis were found in at least one AML at diagnosis in more than 1% of total cells. All AML cases show at least one LAIP but frequently we observed more than one LAIP blast subpopulation in the same sample. Some examples of LAIP observed are CD34+ 38+ 33+ 56+ 19−, CD34+ 38+ 33+ 56− 19+, CD34− DR− 117+ 33+ 15−. In conclusion our results shows that (1) the ability to clearly distinguish leukemic from the healthy cells is considerably increased by 6 color approach (8 parameters analyzed) than 4 color. (2) Furthermore that these aberrant or infrequent phenotypes in normal or regenerating bone marrow samples are identified in AML cases and can be utilized in AML minimal residual disease study. (3) Knowledge of the expression of different markers in normal hematopoietic development provides a frame of reference for identification of abnormal differentiation patterns.

Minimal Residual Disease Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma: Impact on Outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (20) ◽  
pp. 2540-2547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy C. Rawstron ◽  
J. Anthony Child ◽  
Ruth M. de Tute ◽  
Faith E. Davies ◽  
Walter M. Gregory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Medical Research ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Medical Research Council ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Minimal Residual

Purpose To investigate the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in patients with multiple myeloma treated in the MRC (Medical Research Council) Myeloma IX trial. Patients and Methods Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) was used to assess MRD after induction therapy (n = 378) and at day 100 after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT; n = 397) in intensive-pathway patients and at the end of induction therapy in non–intensive-pathway patients (n = 245). Results In intensive-pathway patients, absence of MRD at day 100 after ASCT was highly predictive of a favorable outcome (PFS, P < .001; OS, P = .0183). This outcome advantage was demonstrable in patients with favorable and adverse cytogenetics (PFS, P = .014 and P < .001, respectively) and in patients achieving immunofixation-negative complete response (CR; PFS, P = .0068). The effect of maintenance thalidomide was assessed, with the shortest PFS demonstrable in those MRD-positive patients who did not receive maintenance and longest in those who were MRD negative and did receive thalidomide (P < .001). Further analysis demonstrated that 28% of MRD-positive patients who received maintenance thalidomide became MRD negative. MRD assessment after induction therapy in the non–intensive-pathway patients did not seem to be predictive of outcome (PFS, P = .1). Conclusion MRD assessment by MFC was predictive of overall outcome in patients with myeloma undergoing ASCT. This predictive value was seen in patients achieving conventional CR as well as patients with favorable and adverse cytogenetics. The effects of maintenance strategies can also be evaluated, and our data suggest that maintenance thalidomide can eradicate MRD in some patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document