scholarly journals Lenalidomide in follicular lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 135 (24) ◽  
pp. 2133-2136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Flowers ◽  
John P. Leonard ◽  
Nathan H. Fowler

Abstract Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug approved in the United States for use with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. We reviewed data from trials addressing the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide alone and in combination with rituximab as a first-line therapy and as a treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Lenalidomide-rituximab has been demonstrated to be an effective chemotherapy-free therapy that improves upon single-agent rituximab and may become an alternative to chemoimmunotherapy.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 1811-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
G W Sledge ◽  
P J Loehrer ◽  
B J Roth ◽  
L H Einhorn

Cisplatin has had only minimal activity when used as second- and third-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). There have been no phase II studies in the United States evaluating cisplatin in patients with MBC with no prior chemotherapy. We therefore treated 20 consecutive patients with cisplatin 30 mg/m2/d for four days every 3 weeks for a maximum of six courses. We obtained partial responses in nine of 19 evaluable patients (47%), with responses in liver, lung, and soft tissue indicator lesions. Our data suggest that cisplatin has substantial single-agent activity as front-line therapy in MBC, and should be considered for inclusion in first-line combination chemotherapy regimens.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4787-4787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Arnieri ◽  
Coen Bernaards ◽  
Kenneth Wilhelm ◽  
James Black ◽  
Ceri Hirst ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 18,960 new cases of CLL and 4,660 deaths from CLL are estimated in the US in 2016, with an overall estimated 5-year survival rate of 82%. Despite this, CLL patients with unfavorable genetic features such as 17p deletion have relatively poor outcomes when treated with conventional chemoimmunotherapy (e.g. fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, or bendamustine plus rituximab); however, several new treatments have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of previously untreated CLL in the past 3 years, including obinutuzumab with chlorambucil and ibrutinib. The aim of this analysis was to assess demographics and treatment patterns in patients with previously untreated CLL since the introduction of new treatment options using a novel oncology electronic health record (EHR) database. Methods: A cohort of CLL patients was selected by identifying patients within Flatiron's real-world oncology database. The Flatiron provider network comprises 230 clinics, 2,000 clinicians, and more than 1 million cancer patients throughout the United States (US). Patients included in the cohort were required to meet the following criteria: ≥2 clinic encounters on different days occurring on or after January 1, 2011; ≥1 medication order for an antineoplastic occurring on or after January 1, 2013; physician documentation of CLL; and, evidence in unstructured documents (ie, information not organized in a pre-existing data model, such as free text from a physician note/lab report) of having been treated specifically for CLL. The latter two criteria were assessed based on technology-enabled abstraction of unstructured data (e.g., pathology reports, clinician notes). Patients who lacked unstructured documents, absence of evidence of first-line treatment, or received CLL treatment at a practice outside of the Flatiron network were excluded. The cohort included patients of all ages treated between 2011 and 2015 from all 50 states of the US. The index date was defined as the date of the patient's CLL treatment initiation. Start of first-line therapy after January 1, 2011, was defined as the first episode of an eligible therapy given after or up to 14 days before the date of the patient's CLL treatment initiation. Line of therapy was the first eligible drug episode plus other eligible drugs given within 28 days. Therapies eligible for inclusion in lines of therapy were systemic treatment, as evidenced by an order or administration of an antineoplastic agent recorded in the EHR; radiotherapy and surgery were not included. For patients with documented transformation of CLL, the abstracted date of transformation ended any active line of therapy, and the patient was not considered eligible for any subsequent CLL lines of therapy. Any treatment that occurred after the date of transformation was not included as a CLL line of therapy (steroids were not included in the definition of CLL lines of therapy). Results: As of June 2016, the cohort consisted of 766 eligible CLL patients with a median age of 71 years, and 64% were male (Table 1). While distribution of first-line therapies initiated in 2011 to 2013 remained relatively constant by year, changes were observed during 2014 and 2015 following the introduction of obinutuzumab and ibrutinib (Figure 1); obinutuzumab monotherapy as first-line therapy increased from 8.2% in 2014 to 14.5% in 2015, and ibrutinib monotherapy or ibrutinib + rituximab increased from 10.5% in 2014 to 13.6% in 2015. Of note, fludarabine containing regimens declined from 19.8% in 2012 to 8.8% in 2015. Decreases were also observed with rituximab monotherapy from 21.0% to 16.2%, bendamustine + rituximab (BR) from 36.1% to 31.6%, and rituximab + fludarabine + cyclophosphamide (RFC) from 11.0% to 8.8%. Factors associated with chlorambucil treatment (as monotherapy or in combination) vs. chemoimmunotherapy included older age (75.9 years vs. 68.7 years and 62.6 years for BR and RFC, respectively) and Rai stage (78.1% of patients treated with chlorambucil had Rai stage 0-I disease vs. 70.1% and 71.7% treated with BR and RFC, respectively). A fifth of patients with 17p deletion were treated with ibrutinib. Updated data inclusive of 2016 treatments will be presented. Conclusion: Using a novel EHR database, the marked change in CLL treatments from 2011 to 2015 shows increased utilization of newer agents. Further follow-up and analysis will contrast treatment patterns beyond RCT data in a real-world setting. Disclosures Arnieri: F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd: Employment. Bernaards:F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd: Employment. Wilhelm:Roche: Equity Ownership; Genentech: Employment. Black:F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd: Employment. Hirst:F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd: Employment; AstraZeneca: Other: Previous employment . Taylor:F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd: Employment. Lambert:F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd: Employment. Green:F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd: Employment. Lu:F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd: Employment. Humphrey:Genentech, Inc.: Employment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2333794X2096928
Author(s):  
Alisha K. Bajwa ◽  
Chokechai Rongkavilit

Coccidioidomycosis is a fungal infection that is prevalent in western United States, Central America, and South America. The infection is acquired by inhalation. It can affect persons of all ages including infants and children. The majority of cases are asymptomatic and the incidence of infection is greater during a dry summer season after heavy rainfall in prior winter. For those with symptoms, they may experience a self-limiting influenza-like illness. However, some may progress toward pneumonia or disseminated diseases involving skeletal system and central nervous system. The diagnosis is based mainly on various serology testing. Antifungal treatment is generally not required for those with mild symptoms. For those with moderate to severe infections, the mainstay of treatment is azole, with fluconazole being often considered as the first line therapy. Currently there is no effective solution to prevent coccidioidomycosis. Those who work in high-risk conditions should be given appropriate protective equipment as well as education on proper precaution.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18007-e18007
Author(s):  
Cynthia Barbara Aller ◽  
Paul Rigo ◽  
Ishmael A. Jaiyesimi

e18007 Background: Imatinib mesylate is first-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) since its introduction in May, 2001. Once deadly, CML is now a chronic disorder due to this medication.We sought to analyze the impact on survival in our patient population at Beaumont Health System, a tertiary care facility, versus all hospitals in the United States. Methods: Patients with CML were identified and categorized as pre- or post-2001 when first seen. Analysis of survival in intervals of 12 months in the two groups was done with the Elekta’s National Oncology Data Alliance Database (NODA): 1990-2000 and 2001-2010. Overall 5-year survival results are reported. Results: Analysis of survival was performed on pre- and post-2001 populations in Beaumont patients versus their national counterparts. In the pre-2001 population, 580 patients nationwide and 34 patients from Beaumont were analyzed for a total of 614 patients. In the post-2001 population 1,602 patients nationwide and 122 patients from the Beaumont were analyzed for a total of 1,724 patients. The pre-2001 group nationally showed a survival probability of 28% ± 1.8%, patients in the Beaumont group showed a survival probability of 26% ± 8%. Patients in the post-2001 nationwide group showed a survival probability of 56% ±1.4%, the Beaumont group showed a survival probability of 48% ±5.0%. Both groups showed a significant survival advantage after 2001 in the era of imatinib as first-line therapy for CML. Patients in the national analysis showed a survival advantage of 28% and patients in the Beaumont analysis showed a survival advantage of 22%. Conclusions: This analysis provides evidence for a survival advantage in the post-2001 era of imatinib mesylate therapy a first-line therapy for CML on both a national and our institution level. Differences in numbers of patients analyzed, drug availability, and implementation of molecular monitoring could account for variability of the results. This data supports the revolutionary nature of this medication in the treatment of CML in the United States since 2001.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document