Requirement for CD4 Help for Optimal GVL Effects of Alloreactive T Cells Given to Established Mixed Chimeras but Not Freshly Irradiated Mice.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3044-3044
Author(s):  
Hyeon-Seok Eom ◽  
Ronjon Chakraverty ◽  
Jessica Sachs ◽  
Guiling Zhao ◽  
Megan Sykes
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Cell Subsets ◽  
Class I ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Cross Presentation ◽  
Mixed Chimeras

Abstract Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) may lead to lymphohematopoietic graft-versus-host (GVH) reactions without graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). The graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect of DLI is greater in mixed chimeras than in full chimeras following fully MHC-mismatched bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Some studies showed, following MHC-mismatched BMT, that only CD8+ T cells are involved in GVL effects of DLI against MHC class I+ class II− tumors, but others showed that the GVL effect of DLI is dependent on both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. Previously, we have observed that GVL against EL4 is mediated by CD8+ T cells but not CD4+ T cells following DLI in freshly irradiated mice treated with cytokines to reduce GVHD mortality in fully MHC-mismatched BMT. The exact contribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to the GVL effects of DLI in established mixed chimeras is not known. We hypothesized that lethal conditioning leads to the production of many proinflammatory cytokines which may help to generate a CD4 cell-independent, CD8 cell-mediated anti-tumor effect. However, in delayed DLI recipients, CD4+ helper T cells might be needed to induce CD8+ anti-tumor effector cells. We evaluated the role of T-cell subsets in GVL effects of DLI following fully major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched BMT in freshly irradiated mice and mixed chimeric delayed DLI recipients. While GVL effects of delayed DLI given to established mixed chimeras were dependent on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells did not contribute to GVL effects in freshly irradiated mice. Consistent with this, MHC class II expression on host antigen-presenting cells (APCs) was needed to optimize GVL effects of DLI in established mixed chimeras. To address whether cross-presentation of tumor antigens (Ag) via class I would permit GVL responses in full chimeras, we generated full chimeras in which donor and recipient shared a class I locus. However, there were no GVL effects of delayed DLI in full chimeras, providing no evidence that cross-presentation of tumor Ag through class I molecules shared by donor and the tumor led to anti-tumor effects in this model. We conclude that following delayed DLI to established mixed chimeras, the GVL response requires extensive MHC disparity, MHC class II expression on host APCs and the presence of CD4+ T cells. In contrast, the requirement for CD4+ T cells can be bypassed in freshly irradiated recipients, but this occurs at the expense of a greater risk of GVHD. Administration of delayed DLI to mixed chimeras permits achievement of optimal GVL effects because large numbers of GVH-reactive T cells can be administered without inducing GVHD.

Double Loading of Dendritic Cell MHC Class I and MHC Class II with an AML Antigen Repertoire Enhances Primary and Secondary T-Cell Responses In Vitro.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2529-2529
Author(s):  
William K. Decker ◽  
Dongxia Xing ◽  
Sufang Li ◽  
Simon N. Robinson ◽  
Hong Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cross Presentation ◽  
Ifn Γ

Abstract Despite improvements in therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), a significant percentage of patients still relapse and succumb to their disease. Dendritic cell immunotherapy offers the promise of potentially effective supportive therapy for a variety of neoplastic conditions; and the use of DCs loaded with tumor antigens is now recognized as an important investigational therapy. Though a variety of methods have been used to load DC vaccines, the loading of the MHC class II compartment with tumor lysate has predominated. The priming of a class II-mediated (CD4) T-cell response may be crucial to the success of DC immunotherapy as such a response is likely required for the development of memory CD8+ T-cells. DC cross-presentation is credited with the ability of lysate-loaded DCs to prime both CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses, enabling the generation of CD8+ CTLs without the loading of the MHC class I compartment (i.e. the cytoplasm). Recently, however, several reports have raised doubts as to the efficiency of cross-presentation as a mechanism for CTL priming in vivo. To examine this issue, we have loaded human DCs with both AML tumor lysate and mRNA. This technique allows the full repertoire of class I antigens to be presented without dependence upon cross-presentation; and, moreover, provides a full complement of class II antigens necessary for CD4 T-cell priming and the generation of memory responses. Methods: CD14+ precursors were isolated from normal donor PBPCs by magnetic separation. Immature DCs were then generated by culturing precursors for six days in GM-CSF and IL-4. Lysate was produced by three successive freeze/thaw cycles of blasts. mRNA was extracted from blasts using Trizol and oligo-dT separation. Immature DCs were pulsed for three hours with AML lysate and subsequently electroporated with AML mRNA. Loaded DCs were matured for 48 hours with IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and PGE2 and then used to prime autologous T-cells. Short-term responses were assayed on day 5 of the 1st stimulation. Memory responses were assayed on day 10 of a tertiary stimulation. Results: Doubly-loaded DCs can prime a superior T-cell response in vitro in comparison to that of singly-loaded DCs, demonstrating a 30–70% increase in IFN-γ ELISpots over lysate-loaded DCs (p<0.001) and a 3–4 fold increase in ELISpots in comparison to mRNA loaded DCs (p<0.001). These results were verified by flow cytometry which showed 35% of CD8+ T-cells primed by doubly-loaded DCs were CD69+/IFN-γ+ vs. 14% of CD8+ T-cells primed by lysate-loaded DCs (p<0.001). This enhancement may be based upon both an upregulation of CD83 surface expression (p<0.0019) of doubly-loaded DCs and/or the upregulation of B7.1/B7.2 that accompanies elevated CD40L signaling. Memory responses were also greatly improved, with a 126% increase in total ELISpots (double loaded DCs versus lysate loaded DCs; p<0.03) and a 187% increase in total IFN-γ secretion (p<0.03). Unloaded (p<0.01) and mRNA (p<0.007) loaded DCs exhibited a virtual inability to generate memory T-cells in vitro, suggesting that the perpetuation of the memory response is reliant upon T-cell help. Conclusion: DCs doubly-loaded with lysate and mRNA are more efficient in the generation of primary and secondary immune responses than are singly-loaded DCs. The clinical administration of such doubly-loaded DCs may offer an important therapeutic option to patients with AML.

scholarly journals A Class II-Restricted CD8γ13 T-Cell Clone Protects During Chlamydia muridarum Genital Tract Infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 221 (11) ◽  
pp. 1895-1906
Author(s):  
Raymond M Johnson ◽  
Norma Olivares-Strank ◽  
Gang Peng
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Genital Tract ◽  
Cell Clone ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
T Cell Clone ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background The T-cell response to chlamydia genital tract infections in humans and mice is unusual because the majority of antigen-specific CD8 T cells are not class I restricted (referred to here as “unrestricted” or “atypical”). We previously reported that a subset of unrestricted murine chlamydia-specific CD8 T cells had a cytokine polarization pattern that included interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-13. Methods In this study, we investigated the transcriptome of CD8γ13 T cells, comparing them to Tc1 clones using microarray analysis. That study revealed that CD8γ13 polarization included IL-5 in addition to IFN-γ and IL-13. Adoptive transfer studies were performed with Tc1 clones and a CD8γ13 T-cell clone to determine whether either influenced bacterial clearance or immunopathology during Chlamydia muridarum genital tract infections. Results To our surprise, an adoptively transferred CD8γ13 T-cell clone was remarkably proficient at preventing chlamydia immunopathology, whereas the multifunctional Tc1 clone did not enhance clearance or significantly alter immunopathology. Mapping studies with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I- and class II-deficient splenocytes showed our previously published chlamydia-specific CD8 T-cell clones are MHC class II restricted. Conclusions The MHC class II-restricted CD8 T cells may play an important role in protection from intracellular pathogens that limit class I antigen presentation or diminish CD4 T-cell numbers or impair their function.

Immunological relevance of the tumor associated antigen (TAA) COA-1 in colorectal cancer (CRC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13590-13590
Author(s):  
D. C. Corsi ◽  
C. Maccalli ◽  
M. Ciaparrone ◽  
A. F. Scinto ◽  
G. Cucchiara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Hla Typing ◽  
Class I ◽  
Mhc Molecules

13590 Background: Immunotherapy (IT) in CRC has often produced discouraging results. COA-1 is a new TAA recognized by CD4+ T cells from peripheral blood (PB) of a CRC pt; its immunogenic epitope is presented on the surface of tumor cells in association with DRβ1*1301 or *0402 HLA class II molecules. Our aim is verifying whether an immune response directed against COA-1 mediated by CD4+ T cells can be isolated from PB of CRC pts. To achieve a more efficient anti-tumor response a recognition of a specific antigen by both the CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes should be performed; so different epitopes deriving from the processing of the same antigen should be presented to the immune system in association with both class I and class II MHC molecules. We identified a list of COA-1 derived peptides with the calculated score for the binding to HLA-A2, the more common HLA class I molecule within the Caucasian population. A failure in generating COA-1 specific T cells was observed in stage I-II CRC pts. Methods: From Jan 04 to day PB samples from 36 CRC pts (14 stage III/ 22 stage IV) have been collected and the HLA typing has been performed. Pts. expressing HLA DRbβ*0402, HLA DRβ1*1301 or HLA-A2 have been selected to collect other blood drawns and verifying whether an immune response directed against COA-1 could be isolated from their PB. Results: 4 pts were positive for the expression of DRβ1*1301 and 2 for the expression of DRβ1*0402. PB lymphocytes have been in vitro stimulated with the COA-1 derived epitopes and tumor reactivity has been verified. An immune response directed to COA-1 was detected in the PB of these 6 pts; anti-COA-1 CD4+ T cells were in vitro isolated and their cytotoxicity measured by granzyme B release. 9 pts were positive for the expression of HLA-A2 and we are stimulating the lymphocytes isolated from these pts with 6 selected COA-1 derived peptides binding the HLA-A2. We observed specific CD8+ T cells for 2 peptides in 1 pt. Conclusions: Our data identify COA-1 like an immunogenic antigen that can evoke an anti-tumor immune response CD4+ mediated in CRC; the response correlates with disease progression. Experiments are ongoing to evaluate an immune response mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. These results will determine whether COA-1 could be used for future protocols of IT in CRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals CD4+ T Cells: Multitasking Cells in the Duty of Cancer Immunotherapy

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 596
Author(s):  
Jennifer R. Richardson ◽  
Anna Schöllhorn ◽  
Cécile Gouttefangeas ◽  
Juliane Schuhmacher
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Human Cancer ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cells ◽  
T Cell Subsets ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches

Cancer immunotherapy activates the immune system to specifically target malignant cells. Research has often focused on CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, as those have the capacity to eliminate tumor cells after specific recognition upon TCR-MHC class I interaction. However, CD4+ T cells have gained attention in the field, as they are not only essential to promote help to CD8+ T cells, but are also able to kill tumor cells directly (via MHC-class II dependent recognition) or indirectly (e.g., via the activation of other immune cells like macrophages). Therefore, immunotherapy approaches have shifted from only stimulating CD8+ T cells to targeting and assessing both, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets. Here, we discuss the various subsets of CD4+ T cells, their plasticity and functionality, their relevance in the antitumor immune response in patients affected by cancer, and their ever-growing role in therapeutic approaches for human cancer.

scholarly journals CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (12) ◽  
pp. 5346-5354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainhoa Perez-Diez ◽  
Nathalie T. Joncker ◽  
Kyungho Choi ◽  
William F. N. Chan ◽  
Colin C. Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
Tumor Rejection ◽  
Effector Cells ◽  
Cd8 Cells ◽  
Antitumor Effector

Abstract Researchers designing antitumor treatments have long focused on eliciting tumor-specific CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) because of their potent killing activity and their ability to reject transplanted organs. The resulting treatments, however, have generally been surprisingly poor at inducing complete tumor rejection, both in experimental models and in the clinic. Although a few scattered studies suggested that CD4 T “helper” cells might also serve as antitumor effectors, they have generally been studied mostly for their ability to enhance the activity of CTL. In this mouse study, we compared monoclonal populations of tumor-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells as effectors against several different tumors, and found that CD4 T cells eliminated tumors that were resistant to CD8-mediated rejection, even in cases where the tumors expressed major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules but not MHC class II. MHC class II expression on host tissues was critical, suggesting that the CD4 T cells act indirectly. Indeed, the CD4 T cells partnered with NK cells to obtain the maximal antitumor effect. These findings suggest that CD4 T cells can be powerful antitumor effector cells that can, in some cases, outperform CD8 T cells, which are the current “gold standard” effector cell in tumor immunotherapy.

scholarly journals MHC Class II on Ccl19+ Reticular Cells Mitigates Graft-Versus-Host Disease Via Maintenance of Regulatory T Cells

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 23-23
Author(s):  
Muhammad Haroon Shaikh ◽  
Juan Gamboa Vargas ◽  
Josefina Peña Mosca ◽  
Duc Dung Le ◽  
Hermann Einsele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Alloreactive T Cells ◽  
Reticular Cells

Allogeneic T cell priming is considered as an essential event determining the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), ideally triggering anti-leukemic responses (GvL effect) or, at worst, causing life-threatening acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD). During aGvHD initiation, alloreactive T cells are activated by host antigen presenting cells (APCs), rapidly expand and subsequently exert tissue damage. Recently, it was discovered that in absence of host hematopoietic APCs, aGvHD cannot be prevented, suggesting a crucial role of non-hematopoietic APCs for priming alloreactive T cells (Toubai et al., Blood 2012, Li et al., J Immunol. 2012, Koyama et al., Nat Med 2012). However, the exact location and identity of host non-hematopoietic APCs triggering alloreactive T cell responses remains controversial and needs to be proven in vivo. Fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) have shown to provide the crucial delta-like notch ligand to alloreactive T cells (Chung et al., JCI 2017) in aGvHD, therefore we investigated the role of FRCs MHC class II in aGvHD and their potential role as non-hematopoietic APCs in MHC class II dependent manner. In vitro cultured FRCs cell line as well as FRCs from lethally irradiated mice upregulate MHCII and co-stimulatory molecules. Moreover, FACS sorted FRCs (CD45-CD24-CD31-gp38+) were able to process DQ-OVA via MHC class II machinery, indicating that FRCs have the potential to activate CD4+ T cells. Employing allo-HCT mouse models in combination with flow cytometry and advanced microscopy techniques, we explored early alloreactive T cells activation initially in a myeloablatively conditioned MHC major mismatch allo-HCT setting (FVB/NàC57Bl/6). We generated MHCIIΔCcl19 mice with a Ccl19-intrinsic deletion of MHC class II on all Ccl19 expressing reticular lineage cells by crossing mice with floxed H2-Ab1 gene (H2-Ab1fl) with a mouse expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the Ccl19 promoter (Ccl19Cre). On day+3 after allo-HCT, CD4+ T cells activation (CD44 and CD25 expression) and proliferation (Ki67 expression and CFSE dilution) did not differ in the MHCIIΔCcl19 mice from H2-Ab1fl wildtype littermates. To further elucidate FRCs MHC class II in aGvHD milieu, we utilized iFABP-tOVA transgenic model in which OVA is expressed by intestinal epithelial cells as well as ectopically by FRCs of the lymphoid organs. OT-II cells transferred from RagΔ background mice failed to proliferate in the mLNs of lethally irradiated iFABP-tOVA, whereas excessive proliferation was observed in CD11c.DOG mice (where OVA is presented by CD11c-expressing cells). Taken together these results indicate that MHCII on FRCs does not play a role in direct antigen presentation and CD4+ T cell activation. Next, we asked whether MHCII on FRCs influences alloreactivity of CD4+ T cells in the symptomatic phase of aGvHD. Indeed, in MHCIIΔCcl19 mice, CD4+ T cells expressed higher levels of effector molecules: CD44 and CD127 as well as the proliferation marker Ki67 on day +30 of allo-HCT. Furthermore, the proportion of donor CD90.1+CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) were reduced in MHCIIΔCcl19 mice as compared to H2-Ab1fl wild-type littermates. This led to overall poor survival of MHCIIΔCcl19 mice by day+60 after allo-HCT. At this time point in MHCIIΔCcl19 mice CD4+ T cells displayed higher levels of CD44, CD127 and Ki67 and down-regulated PD-1 and Lag3. To further elucidate the effect of FRCs MHC class II on CD4+FoxP3+ donor Tregs, we transplanted CD90.1+CD4+CD25hi Tregs, TCD BM from FVB mice along with naïve luc+ CD90.1+CD4+ T cells from FVB.L2G85 mice. Tregs protected against aGvHD in H2-Ab1fl littermate controls whereas Tregs could not protect MHCIIΔCcl19 recipients rendering them susceptible to aGvHD and to poor overall survival. Conclusively, these results indicate for the first time that MHC class II on FRCs assists to maintain donor Tregs in the SLOs after allo-HCT. Conclusively, we propose a model in which FRCs promote T cell alloreactivity by providing notch ligands (Chung et al., JCI 2017) in the initiation phase and mitigate aGvHD by maintenance of Tregs via MHC class II in the aGvHD-effector phase. Disclosures Einsele: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Mechanisms of mouse spleen dendritic cell function in the generation of influenza-specific, cytolytic T lymphocytes.

1992 ◽  
Vol 176 (2) ◽  
pp. 519-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Nonacs ◽  
C Humborg ◽  
J P Tam ◽  
R M Steinman
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Mhc Class I ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Class I

We have evaluated the capacity of dendritic cells to function as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) for influenza and have examined their mechanism of action. Virus-pulsed dendritic cells were 100 times more efficient than bulk spleen cells in stimulating cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) formation. The induction of CTLs required neither exogenous lymphokines nor APCs in the responding T cell population. Infectious virus entered dendritic cells through intracellular acidic vacuoles and directed the synthesis of several viral proteins. If ultraviolet (UV)-inactivated or bromelain-treated viruses were used, viral protein synthesis could not be detected, and there was poor induction of CTLs. This indicated that dendritic cells were not capable of processing noninfectious virus onto major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. However, UV-inactivated and bromelain-treated viruses were presented efficiently to class II-restricted CD4+ T cells. The CD4+ T cells crossreacted with different strains of influenza and markedly amplified CTL formation. Cell lines that lacked MHC class II, and consequently the capacity to stimulate CD4+ T cells, failed to induce CTLs unless helper lymphokines were added. Similarly, dendritic cells pulsed with the MHC class I-restricted nucleoprotein 147-155 peptide were poor stimulators in the absence of exogenous helper factors. We conclude that the function of dendritic cells as APCs for the generation of virus-specific CTLs in vitro depends measurably upon: (a) charging class I molecules with peptides derived from endogenously synthesized viral antigens, and (b) stimulating a strong CD4+ helper T cell response.

scholarly journals Discordance in the Epithelial Cell-Dendritic Cell Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Immunoproteome: Implications for Chlamydia Vaccine Development

2019 ◽  
Vol 221 (5) ◽  
pp. 841-850
Author(s):  
Karuna P Karunakaran ◽  
Hong Yu ◽  
Xiaozhou Jiang ◽  
Queenie W T Chan ◽  
Leonard J Foster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Major Histocompatibility Complex ◽  
Epithelial Cell ◽  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Protective Immunity ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Histocompatibility Complex

Abstract Background Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia muridarum are intracellular bacterial pathogens of mucosal epithelial cells. CD4 T cells and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules are essential for protective immunity against them. Antigens presented by dendritic cells (DCs) expand naive pathogen-specific T cells (inductive phase), whereas antigens presented by epithelial cells identify infected epithelial cells as targets during the effector phase. We previously showed that DCs infected by C trachomatis or C muridarum present epitopes from a limited spectrum of chlamydial proteins recognized by Chlamydia-specific CD4 T cells from immune mice. Methods We hypothesized that Chlamydia-infected DCs and epithelial cells present overlapping sets of Chlamydia-MHC class II epitopes to link inductive and effector phases to generate protective immunity. We tested that hypothesis by infecting an oviductal epithelial cell line with C muridarum, followed by immunoaffinity isolation and sequencing of MHC class I- and II-bound peptides. Results We identified 26 class I-bound and 4 class II-bound Chlamydia-derived peptides from infected epithelial cells. We were surprised to find that none of the epithelial cell class I- and class II-bound chlamydial peptides overlapped with peptides presented by DCs. Conclusions We suggest the discordance between the DC and epithelial cell immunoproteomes has implications for delayed clearance of Chlamydia and design of a Chlamydia vaccine.

scholarly journals Differentiation of Ia-reactive CD8+ murine T cells does not require Ia engagement. Implications for the role of CD4 and CD8 accessory molecules in T cell differentiation.

1988 ◽  
Vol 168 (1) ◽  
pp. 437-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Mizuochi ◽  
L Tentori ◽  
S O Sharrow ◽  
A M Kruisbeek ◽  
A Singer
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Cell Differentiation ◽  
Class I Mhc ◽  
Accessory Molecules

The present study was undertaken to assess the Ia differentiation requirements of CD8+ class II-allospecific CTL, whose CD8+ phenotype is apparently "discordant" with their MHC class II reactivity. To do so, we compared the effect of in vivo anti-Ia blockade on the differentiation of Ia-reactive CD8+ CTL with its effect on the differentiation of CD4+ T cells. We found that anti-Ia blockade did not detectably interfere with the differentiation of CD8+ Ia-reactive CTL, even though it arrested the differentiation of CD4+ T cells. Thus, the differentiation of CD4+ T cells is strictly dependent upon Ia engagement, whereas the differentiation of CD8+ T cells, even those with reactivity against MHC class II alloantigens, does not require Ia engagement. These results support the concept that Ia-reactive CD8+ T cells are conventional CD8+ CTL, probably selected by self-class I MHC molecules during differentiation, whose receptors fortuitously crossreact on MHC class II alloantigens. Taken together, the present data indicate an intimate relationship between CD4/CD8 expression with MHC class specificity during T cell differentiation and selection. We suggest that an active triggering role for CD4 and CD8 accessory molecules in T cell differentiation is best able to explain these observations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document