A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Thalidomide in Patients with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma.

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma disproportionately affects the elderly and is currently an incurable malignancy. New therapies for myeloma, particularly oral therapies, are urgently needed. Objectives: To determine if thalidomide with or without other agents, improves response rate (≥ 50% reduction in monoclonal protein), survival, and/or progression in patients with previously untreated myeloma. To determine the frequency and significance of major adverse events associated with thalidomide in this setting. Methods: A literature search of Medline (1966–June 2006), Embase (1980–June 2006), the Cochrane Library, abstracts from the annual meetings of the American Society of Hematology (1999–2005) and the American Society of Oncology (1999–2006) was completed with a pre-specified search strategy. No language restrictions were applied. Randomized controlled trials of induction thalidomide (any dose, any duration) for adults with previously untreated multiple myeloma were included. Trials of exclusively maintenance therapy were excluded. Two reviewers independently extracted data. The methodological quality of selected trials was assessed and summarized. Weighted data was expressed as relative risk, risk difference, number needed to treat (NNT), and number needed to harm (NNH). A random-effects model was used. Results: Six eligible studies involving almost two thousand patients (N=1875) were identified and meta-analyzed. Two studies were published and four were reported in abstract form only. Five studies reported overall response rate (ORR); the four largest trials reported statistically significant improvements in ORR with the addition of thalidomide to standard therapy. The weighted relative risk of responding to a thalidomide-containing regimen versus control was 1.50 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.86). The NNT to achieve one additional response with thalidomide was 4 (95% CI 2.9 to 8.3). Two trials reported improvements in EFS/PFS. One trial reported an improvement in OS. The risk of VTE, peripheral neuropathy, and constipation was consistently elevated with thalidomide such that for every 50 patients treated with a thalidomide-containing-regimen, one could expect 12 to 13 additional patients to respond, 4 additional patients to develop VTE (NNH 12.5; 95% CI 8.3 to 20), 2 additional patients to develop peripheral neuropathy (NNH 25; 95% CI 16.7 to 50), and 4 additional patients to develop constipation (NNH14; 95% CI 10 to 25). In our analyses, prophylactic anticoagulation appeared to decrease, but not abolish, the risk of VTE with thalidomide. Conclusions: Thalidomide improves response rate and possibly progression free and overall survival in patients with previously untreated myeloma. It also increases the incidence of VTE, neuropathy, constipation and other adverse events. Further studies are required to confirm the survival advantage seen in one study, and to determine the optimum strategy for VTE prophylaxis.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Selinexor-Based Treatment in Multiple Myeloma, a Meta-Analysis Based on Prospective Clinical Trials

Frontiers in Pharmacology ◽

10.3389/fphar.2021.758992 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Yali Tao ◽

Hui Zhou ◽

Ting Niu

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Response Rate ◽

Complete Response Rate ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Complete Response ◽

Cochrane Central Register ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Grade 3

Background: Selinexor (SEL) is an orally bioavailable, highly-selective, and slowly-reversible small molecule that inhibits Exportin 1. Preclinical studies showed that SEL had synergistic antimyeloma activity with glucocorticoids, proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulators. The combination of selinexor and dexamethasone (DEX) has been approved in the United States for patients with penta-refractory multiple myeloma in July 2019. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of selinexor based treatment in Multiple myeloma.Methods: We systematically searched the Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Library databases and ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcome measures of efficacy included overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), stringent complete response rate (sCR), complete response rate (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response rate (PR), minimal response (MR), rate of stable disease (SDR), rate of progressive disease (PDR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS). Safety was evaluated by the incidences of all grade adverse events and Grade≥3 adverse events. The subgroup analysis was conducted to analyze the difference in different combination treatment regimens (SEL + DEX + PIs vs SEL + DEX).Results: We included six studies with 477 patients. The pooled ORR, CBR, sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, MR, SDR, and PDR were 43% (18–67%), 55% (32–78%), 5% (−2–13%), 7% (4–11%), 14% (5–24%), 23% (15–31%), 11% (8–14%), 26% (14–38%) and 14% (4–23%), respectively. SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had higher ORR (54 vs 24%, p = 0.01), CBR (66 vs 37%, p = 0.01), sCR (10 vs 2%, p = 0.0008), and VGPR (23 vs 5%, p < 0.00001) compared to SEL + DEX treatment, and lower PDR (4 vs 23%, p < 0.00001) and SDR (17 vs 37%, p = 0.0006). The pooled incidences of any grade and grade≥3 were 45 and 30% in hematological AEs, and in non-hematological AEs were 40 and 30%, respectively. The most common all grade (68%) and grade≥3 (54%) hematological AE were both thrombocytopenia. Fatigue was the most common all grade (62%) and grade≥3 (16%) non-hematological AE. Compared to SEL + DEX treatment, SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had lower incidences of hyponatremia (39 vs 12%, p < 0.00001), nausea (72 vs 52%, p < 0.00001), vomiting (41 vs 23%, p < 0.0001), and weight loss (42 vs 17%, p = 0.03) in all grade AEs. Meanwhile, SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had lower incidences of anemia (36 vs 16%, p = 0.02), fatigue (20 vs 13%, p = 0.04), hyponatremia (22 vs 5%, p < 0.0001) than SEL + DEX treatment in grade≥3 AEs.Conclusion: Our meta-analysis revealed that selinexor-based regimens could offer reasonable efficacy and tolerable adverse events in patients with multiple myeloma. SEL + DEX + PIs treatments had higher efficacy and lower toxicities than SEL + DEX.

Download Full-text

Pomalidomide Based Regimens for Treatment of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111439 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2022-2022

Author(s):

Adeela Mushtaq ◽

Ahmad Iftikhar ◽

Midhat Lakhani ◽

Fnu Sagar ◽

Ahmad Kamal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Significant Heterogeneity ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Stratified Analysis

Abstract Introduction Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide (Len), an immunomodulatory drug are the backbone of established treatment regimens for newly diagnosed MM. Patients with dual-refractory (refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide) disease have a poor prognosis with overall survival estimated to be less than one year. Pomalidomide (Pom) has distinct anticancer, antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory properties and has demonstrated synergistic antiproliferative activity in combination regimens. The aim of our study is to compare different Pom based regimens to identify the most effective regimen for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Embase and AdisInsight databases on 03/29/2018 which identified a total of 1374 studies. We included phase II/III clinical trials on pomalidomide based regimens that have clearly documented efficacy outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) Version 3. We used the Cochrane Q statistics (p<0.05 considered significant) and I2 index to calculate the degree of heterogeneity of the studies. A random effect model was used if there was significant heterogeneity (p>0.05 or I2 >50%). Studies were classified into subgroups according to the therapeutic regimen: dual and triplet combinations. A separate stratified analysis of triplet regimens based on type of regimen was also performed. Results A total of 35 studies (n = 4623 patients) were included. The most commonly studied regimen was Pom + LoDex (Low dose dexamethasone) with a total of 16 studies on this regimen. All patients included in our study had ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy. Mean number of prior lines of therapy was 6. Most patients were lenalidomide refractory, with 10 patient cohorts of 100% refractoriness and 8 cohorts of ≥ 90% refractoriness. Pooled analysis showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 47.1% across all Pom regimens including both doublet and triplet regimens. An I2 value of 87.3 was found, indicating high heterogeneity across all Pom regimens. With Pom-LoDex, pooled ORR was found to be 35.7% and mean OS 14.37 months. With triplet regimens, pooled ORR was found to be 61.9%. In a separate stratified analysis of triplet regimens based on type of regimen, pooled ORRs with few selected regimens were as follows; Bort-Pom-LoDex (pooled ORR 83.5%, mean PFS 15.7 months [mos]), CFZ-Pom-LoDex (pooled ORR 77.1%, mean PFS 15.3 mos), Pom-LoDex-bendamustine (pooled ORR 74.2%), Pom-Dex-daratumumab (pooled ORR 64.5%), Pom-LoDex-cyclophosphamide (pooled ORR 59.4%, mean PFS 9.5 mos), Pom-LoDex-doxorubicin (pooled ORR 32%). Most frequently reported adverse event with Pom based regimens was myelosuppression. Mean incidences of grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events were neutropenia (47.6%), anemia (26.5%), and thrombocytopenia (20.8%). Mean incidences of grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events were infections (29.1%), pneumonia (13.8%) and fatigue (10%). Most of the studies used pomalidomide 4mg daily dosing. Lacy et al. suggested no advantage of 4mg pomalidomide over 2 mg daily dosing. Conclusion From results of pooled analysis, we can infer that triplet combinations of Pom yield almost double response rates (pooled ORR 61.9%) when compared to dual combination of Pom-LoDex (pooled ORR 35.7%). Among three drug combinations, Bort-Pom-LoDex (pooled ORR 83.5%) and CFZ-Pom-LoDex (pooled ORR 77.1%) seem to produce better outcomes. Our study provides useful insight into relative efficacy of various Pom regimens for treatment of RRMM patients. Several trials involving various MoAbs like nivolumab, daratumumab, elotuzumab, isatuximab and pembrolizumab in combination with Pom-LoDex are currently ongoing. Pomalidomide has an acceptable safety profile. Most common treatment emergent adverse events were myelotoxicity and infections that can be effectively managed with supportive care and dose modifications. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Toxicity Profile of Elotuzumab for Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117209 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5640-5640

Author(s):

Faiza Jamil ◽

Madeeha Shafqat ◽

Sharoon Samuel ◽

Zunairah Shah ◽

Ceren Durer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Single Agent ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Drug Regimen ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Control Group

Abstract Background: Elotuzumab (elo) is a humanized monoclonal antibody, which has been approved by the FDA for use in combination with lenalidomide (lena) and dexamethasone (dexa) in patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Elotuzumab is effective as a single agent, as well as in combination for multiple myeloma treatments, supporting the use of elo in pts with RRMM and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) pts. Method: After review of literature using database searches was done on 6/27/18 (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Clinical Trials.gov), 9 prospective and 1 retrospective study with 1128 enrolled pts met the inclusion criteria to date in RRMM and 2 clinical trials including 123 pts in NDMM (Table 1). CMA software v.3 was used for meta-analysis. A random-effect model was applied. Result: Regimens used in RRMM: Based on pooled analysis (95% CI), an overall response rate (ORR) of 66% (54-76.2) was calculated in 685 evaluable pts treated with elo based regimens in RRMM (Figure 1). Most common grade (G) ≥ 3 hematological adverse events (HAE) and non-hematological adverse events (NHAE) based on regimen were calculated using pooled analysis in RRMM pts (Table 2). Anemia was noted in 12.1% ( 7.7-18.6) in 559 pts, while neutropenia in 14.5% (7.5-26.4) out of 591 pts and thrombocytopenia (tcp) in 11.9% (7.9-17.4) in 198 evaluable pts. Diarrhea 5.5% (3.6-8.3), pyrexia 2.4% (1.5-4), peripheral neuropathy (PN) 8.4% (3.8-17.8) were measured in 626, 668 and 143 pts respectively. Elotuzumab as monotherapy: 1 study (n=34) evaluated the efficacy of elo as single agent in RRMM. The median age, time from diagnosis and number of prior therapies were 64.5 years (y) (46-87), 4.4 y (0.9-12.8) and 4.5 y (2-10) respectively. It produced an ORR of 1.4% (0.1-19.1 95% CI) in 34 evaluable pts. Adverse events recorded were pyrexia and fatigue in 17.6% and 8.8% pts respectively. Elotuzumab in two drug regimen: In RRMM, 2 clinical trials (n=49) evaluated the efficacy (95% CI) of elo, ORR of 25% (4.1-72.3) was calculated. The best PFS (progression free survival) produced was in combination of elo 20 mg with bortezumib (bort) 1.3mg/m2 of 9.46 months as compared to 1.8 months when elo10mg/kg + dexamethasone (dexa) 28mg was used. In our analysis for safety, common G≥ 3 HAE calculated were, thrombocytopenia 8.7% (3.3-21.1) n=49, neutropenia 10.7 % (3.5-28.4) n=28 pts and anemia 7.1% (1.8-24.5) n=28 pts. NHAE included diarrhea 1.7% (0.1-22.3), PN 10.7% (3.5-28.4), pyrexia 1.7% (0.1-22.3) in 28 evaluable pts each. Elotuzumab in three drug regimen: In RRMM, 10 clinical trials including 602 pts evaluated the efficacy of elo as a part of triple drug regimen, producing an ORR of 72.2% (54-76.2). The best results were produced with the combination of elo 10-20mg/kg + lenalidomide (lena) 25mg + dexa 40mg producing a PFS of 32.2 mo and 28.62 mo in its phase I and II cohorts respectively. Based on pooled analysis (95% CI) common HAE calculated were neutropenia 17.5% (7.6-35.4) in n=563, thrombocytopenia 12.7% (8.2-19.4) in n=149 and anemia 13% (8-20.5) in n=531 pts. Common G ≥ 3 NHAE estimated were diarrhea 5.7% (3.7-8.6), PN 6.6% (2-19.2), pyrexia 2.5% (1.5-4.1) in 598, 115 and 640 pts respectively. Elotuzumab based regimen in NDMM: A currently ongoing clinical trial NCT02272803 has produced promising results in NDMM pts. As a part of three drug regimen with dose of elo 10mg/kg-20mg/kg, lena 25mg, dexa 20mg in 40 pts produced an ORR of 87.5% (73.2-95.8) versus control group of lena 25mg plus dexa 40mg in 42 pts with an ORR of 73.8% (58-86.1). The PFS rate recorded at 1 year was 93% (79-98%) and 91% (73-97%) respectively. The HAE G ≥ 3 included, neutropenia 18% and leukopenia 15%. In another study with 41 pts, elo was used in combination with lena, bort and dexa producing an ORR of 100% and greater than grade 3 adverse events including Tcp 15%, PN 2%. Conclusion: Results produced in our study suggest that elotuzumab is highly effective when used in pts with RRMM and NDMM. Combination regimens for elo produces an ORR ranging from 79-83% with elo + lena+ dexa, proving that the best results were produced by three drug regimens. Large prospective studies are required to evaluate efficacy and safety of elotuzumab in combination therapies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Efficacy and Toxicity Profile of Ixazomib for Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117159 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5639-5639

Author(s):

Madeeha Shafqat ◽

Faiza Jamil ◽

Zunairah Shah ◽

Ali Younas Khan ◽

Seren Durer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Drug Regimen ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Background: Ixazomib (Ixa) is the first FDA approved oral proteasome inhibitor to be used for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of all published prospective clinical trials to analyze the efficacy and safety of ixazomib in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Method: After review of literature (last updated June 30, 2018) using database searches (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Clinical Trials.gov), from a total of 1290 studies, only fifteen clinical trials (n=1387) met the inclusion criteria for RRMM and eight clinical trials (n=537) met criteria for NDMM. CMA software v.3 was used for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I2 test. A random-effect model was applied. Result: Based on pooled analysis, an overall response rate (ORR) of 40.6% (95% CI:19.4-66.0) with a very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) of 15.7% (95% CI: 6.8-32.1) in RRMM and ORR (CR+VGPR+PR) of 77.5% (95% CI: 73.1-81.4, I2=48.05) in NDMM was observed. Most common grade (G) ≥ 3 adverse events (AE) based on regimen were calculated using pooled analysis in MM patients. Ixazomib Based Regimen in RRMM: Ixazomib as monotherapy: Four studies (n=192) evaluated the efficacy of ixazomib as a single agent. On subgroup pooled analysis on Ixa as monotherapy, an ORR of 22.7% (95% CI: 13.3-35.9, I2=45%) was observed with ≥VGPR of 7.8% (95% CI: 2.7-20.3). Pooled analysis for safety profile on most common G ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were thrombocytopenia 32.3% (95% CI: 22.4-44.2), neutropenia 21.5% (95% CI: 12.6-34.1), diarrhea 13.1% (95% CI: 6.8-23.9), fatigue 11.6% (95% CI: 7.4-17.7) and peripheral neuropathy 2.2% (95% CI: 0.7-6.6). Ixazomib in two drug regimen: In RRMM, two clinical trials (n=92) evaluated the efficacy of Ixa weekly with dexamethasone (D). In this subgroup pooled analysis, ORR of 40.7% (95% CI: 22.8-61.5, I2=41.76%) with ≥VGPR of 19.5% (95% CI: 4.6-52) was calculated. One study reported event-free survival (EFS) of 8.4 months(4.5-12.8) with a 1-year overall survival rate of 96% (95% CI: 91-100). In our analysis for safety (n=102), common G≥ 3 AEs calculated was thrombocytopenia in 20% (95% CI: 7.5-43.7), neutropenia in 14.3% (95% CI: 3.7-41.6), fatigue in 9.1% (95% CI: 5.0-16.2), diarrhea in 5.7% (1.1-25.5), nausea in 5.7% (95% CI: 1.4-20.2) and peripheral neuropathy in 5.7% (95% CI: 1.4-20.2). Ixazomib in three drug regimen: In RRMM, the efficacy of Ixa was evaluated inten clinical trials (n=646), an ORR of 56.3% (95% CI: 41.8-65.5, I2=82%) with ≥VGPR of 22.8% (95% CI: 13.2-36.4) was noted. Best response was seen when Ixa was used in combination with lenalidomide (R) and dexamethasone, with reported ORR of 78.3%. Common AEs were neutropenia 23.5% (95% CI: 16-33.1), thrombocytopenia 18.8% (95% CI: 13.4-25.6) anemia 10.5% (95% CI: 8.2-13.2), diarrhea 6.3% (95% CI: 3.4 -11.3), fatigue 4.2% (95% CI:2.7-6.4), nausea 1.8% (95% CI: 0.9-3.5) and peripheral neuropathy 2.3% (95% CI: 1.3-3.9). Ixazomib Based Regimen In NDMM: Pooled analysis of subgroup study for combination regimen of Ixa as IRD, Ixa-Thalidomide (T)-D, Ixa-Cyclophosphamide (C)-D, and with Ixa -melphalan-prednisone (IMP), their estimated ORR was 83.7% (95% CI: 75.6-89.5), 80.8% (95% CI: 72.8-86.9), 75% (95% CI: 66.6-82) and 66% (95% CI: 52.4-77.4) respectively. We also measured the efficacy of Ixa as a maintenance therapy, estimated ORR was 81.5% (95% CI: 36.6-97.1, I2=90.5%). In one phase II maintenance study (n=64), a combination of IR receiving patients (n=34), an ORR of 90.4% with VGPR of 53% was reported. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached after a median follow up of 37.8 months and estimated 2-year PFS was 81%. Common G≥3 AEs in NDMM patients were neutropenia 21.6% (95% CI: 11.2-37.6), thrombocytopenia 15.9% (95% CI: 4.7- 42), infections 15.2% (95% CI: 10.3-21.9) and peripheral neuropathy 7.9% (95% CI: 4.7-13). Conclusion: In our pooled analysis (95%CI), Ixazomib has shown promising efficacy both in NDMM as well as RRMM. Especially in three drug regimen it showed an estimated ORR of 84.8% in NDMM and 56.3% RRMM.Cytopenia was a common side effect.Peripheral neuropathy was noted to be a rare side-effect (2.6%) in RRMM. Further studies are required to evaluate efficacy and safety of ixazomib in combination therapies in NDMM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of calcitonin for treating acute pain associated with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: an updated systematic review

CJEM ◽

10.1017/cem.2019.490 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (3) ◽

pp. 359-367 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Emily Boucher ◽

Brianna Rosgen ◽

Eddy Lang

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Acute Pain ◽

Salmon Calcitonin ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Compression Fracture ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽

Control Group ◽

Number Needed To Treat ◽

Compression Fractures

ABSTRACTObjectiveAcutely painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are associated with hospitalization and mortality in older adults. Calcitonin may be an alternative to opioid or nonopioid analgesia for treating acute compression fracture pain in emergency and primary care settings. This review summarizes pain, function, and adverse events associated with calcitonin.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, clinical trials registries, and reference lists of included studies. Eligible studies evaluated the effect of synthetic calcitonins (salmon, eel, and human) on pain scores in adults ≥60 years old with a recent atraumatic compression fracture. Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and allocated bias in duplicate. A random effects meta-analysis evaluated standard mean difference (SMD) and heterogeneity (I2).ResultsOf 1,198 articles screened, 11 were included (9 in the meta-analysis). Treatment lasted from 14 days to 6 months. Pain was lower in the salmon calcitonin group (100–200 IU IM or NAS, daily) than the control group with high certainty of evidence at week 1 (SMD, -1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.02 – -1.06; I2 = 52%), representing a number needed to treat of two. The analgesic efficacy of salmon calcitonin at 4 weeks was unclear due to substantial heterogeneity. There was low certainty evidence that calcitonin did not increase the overall risk of adverse events, including nausea and vomiting (risk ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 0.87–5.08; I2 = 47%).ConclusionsCalcitonin is beneficial and appears safe for treating acute pain associated with compression fractures. Further studies may improve the certainty of evidence.

Download Full-text

Patients With IBD Receiving Methotrexate Are at Higher Risk of Liver Injury Compared With Patients With Non-IBD Diseases: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Frontiers in Medicine ◽

10.3389/fmed.2021.774824 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

Author(s):

Yang Wang ◽

Yimin Li ◽

Yun Liu ◽

Yifan Zhang ◽

Ziliang Ke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Relative Risk ◽

Liver Injury ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Future Research ◽

The Difference ◽

Trim And Fill ◽

The Cochrane Library ◽

Rr Relative Risk

Background: Methotrexate is well-known in treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (Ps), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Several reports have indicated a higher incidence of methotrexate (MTX)-related liver adverse events in patients with IBD. We aim to investigate the risk of liver injury in patients with IBD and those with non-IBD diseases treated with MTX.Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles that reported liver adverse events in patients with IBD, RA, and Ps/PsA, receiving MTX therapy. Additional articles were obtained by screening the references of recent meta-analysis and reviews. Raw data from included articles were pooled to calculate the cumulative incidence of total liver injury (TLI), MTX discontinuation (MTX-D), and liver fibrosis (LF). RR (relative risk) was calculated to compare the difference between patients with IBD and those with non-IBD diseases.Results: A total of 326 articles with 128,876 patients were included. The patients with IBD had higher incidence of TLI [11.2 vs. 9.2%; relative risk (RR) = 1.22; P = 0.224] and MTX-D (2.6 vs. 1.8%; RR, 1.48; P = 0.089) than patients with non-IBD diseases. Due to the publication bias, trim-and-fill was performed. Afterwards, the patients with IBD showed significantly higher risk of TLI (11.2 vs. 3%; RR = 3.76; p < 0.001), MTX-D (3.3 vs. 0.7%; RR = 5; p < 0.001) and LF (3.1 vs. 0.1%; RR = 38.62; P = 0.001) compared with patients with non-IBD diseases.Conclusion: IBD is associated with a higher risk of MTX-related liver injury. The mechanism of MTX-induced hepatotoxicity might be different in IBD and non-IBD diseases, and needs to be verified in future research.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Bone-Targeting Radioisotopes in Patients with Bone Metastases: A Meta-Analysis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-805434/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Wanzhong Ye ◽

Yijun Fan ◽

Guoping Shen

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Bone Metastases ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Occurrence Rate ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Hematological Toxicity ◽

Overall Response ◽

Radium 223

Abstract Background: Radionuclides such as Strontium-89, Samarium-153, and Radium-223 are commonly used for the treatment of bone metastases (BM) and they have shown efficacy in previous studies. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the curative performance of different types of radionuclides in patients with BM, and to provide evidence for further future research and clinical practice.Methods: The electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched. Studies using radionuclides therapy to cure patients were included. Pooled overall response rate, occurrence rates of common adverse events, hazard ratio (HR), and their respective 95% confidence interval (CIs) were calculated.Results: A total of 28 articles with 33 studies patients were identified for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The types of radionuclides used in the studies contained 89Sr, 153Sm, 223Ra, 186Re, and 188Re. The overall response rate was 72% [66%, 77%]. The respective overall response rates of 89Sr, 153Sm, and 223Ra were 72% [64%, 79%], 80% [75%, 84%], and 54% [32%, 75%]. In the survival analysis, the pooled HR was 0.85 [0.67, 1.08]. The pooled occurrence rate of leucocyte hematological toxicity of any grade was 5% [2%, 8%]. The pooled occurrence rate of thrombocytopenia of any grade was 7% [5%, 8%]. With regard to anemia, the pooled occurrence rate of any grade was 15% [11%, 19%].Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that radionuclides therapy is efficacious in patients, type of radionuclides and history of patients should be considered to prevent potential adverse events.

Download Full-text

Optimal dose of erenumab for preventive treatment of episodic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Current Neuropharmacology ◽

10.2174/1570159x19666210823104916 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 ◽

Author(s):

Yanbo Yang ◽

Mingjia Chen ◽

Da Wu ◽

Yue Sun ◽

Fan Jiang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Response Rate ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Preventive Treatment ◽

Episodic Migraine ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Migraine Treatment ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Safety Outcomes

Background : Erenumab is a novel monoclonal calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antibody that is used for the preventive treatment of migraine. Objectives : To evaluate overall safety and efficacy and dose-response relationship of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine and patients with prior migraine treatment failures. Methods : We searched randomized clinical trials on PUBMED, EMBASE database, and Cochrane Library database. A pair-wise meta-analysis and Bayesian network analysis were performed. Results : For efficacy outcomes, the network meta-analysis suggests that compared with erenumab 70 mg, participants received erenumab 140 mg reported significantly decreased monthly acute migraine-specific medication days(MSMD) and increased 50% response rate, and erenumab was most likely to be ranked first for monthly migraine days(MMD), MSMD and 50% response rate. For safety outcomes, the network meta-analysis has found no significant difference between the 70 mg group and the 140 mg group measured by adverse events and serious adverse events. For patients with ≥2 treatment failures, 140mg erenumab group, patients with ≥2 treatment failures reported significantly reduced MMD and MSMD, increased 50%, and 75% response rate, compared with placebo. For safety outcomes, no significant difference was found between 140 mg erenumab group and the placebo group. Conclusion : Erenumab was effective in patients with episodic migraine. 140 mg erenumab was associated with better efficacy outcomes without increased risk for developing adverse events compared with 70 mg erenumab, and 140 mg erenumab was effective in patients with prior migraine treatment failures.

Download Full-text

The association between immune-related adverse events and the prognosis of solid cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology ◽

10.1177/1758835920980546 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

pp. 175883592098054

Author(s):

Huilin Xu ◽

Ximing Xu ◽

Wei Ge ◽

Jinju Lei ◽

Dedong Cao

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Good Survival ◽

Solid Cancer ◽

Cancer Type ◽

Early Effect ◽

Overall Response

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and reported to be associated with good survival. This study evaluated the association between onset timing of irAEs and survival of cancer patients treated with ICIs. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched to retrieve clinical studies assessing the relationship between irAEs and survival in cancer patients with ICIs. The overall response rate for treatment response and hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using RevMan 5.3. Subgroup analysis in terms of cancer type, ICIs type, region, specific irAEs, accordingly. Results: A total of 34 studies were included. The HRs for OS and PFS in cancer patients with versus without irAEs were 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.74; p < 0.0001], and 0.50 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.67; p < 0.00001), respectively. The odds ratio for overall response in cancer patients with irAEs was 4.72 (95% CI: 3.48, 6.40; p < 0.00001) compared with those without irAEs. Subgroup analyses suggested that the prognostic role of irAEs was associated with cancer types and region, but not irAEs types. The landmark analysis of OS revealed that there is a non-proportional (early) effect of irAEs on OS in ICI-treated cancer patients (landmark >12 weeks, HROS = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.30; p = 0.46). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the occurrence of irAEs could be a prognostic factor for cancer patients who were treated with ICIs.

Download Full-text

Daily sodium consumption and CVD mortality in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Public Health Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s1368980014000949 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 18 (4) ◽

pp. 695-704 ◽

Cited By ~ 37

Author(s):

Rosana Poggio ◽

Laura Gutierrez ◽

María G Matta ◽

Natalia Elorriaga ◽

Vilma Irazola ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Relative Risk ◽

General Population ◽

Prospective Studies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Random Effects Models ◽

Meta Regression ◽

Cvd Mortality

AbstractObjectiveThe purpose of the present study was to determine whether elevated dietary Na intake could be associated with CVD mortality.DesignWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies representing the general population. The adjusted relative risks and their 95 % confidence intervals were pooled by the inverse variance method using random-effects models. Heterogeneity, publication bias, subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed.SettingsMEDLINE (since 1973), Embase (since 1975), the Cochrane Library (since 1976), ISI Web of Science, Google Scholar (until September 2013) and secondary referencing were searched for inclusion in the study.SubjectEleven prospective studies with 229 785 participants and average follow-up period of 13·37 years (range 5·5–19 years).ResultsHigher Na intake was significantly associated with higher CVD mortality (relative risk=1·12; 95 % CI 1·06, 1·19). In the sensitivity analysis, the exclusion of studies with important relative weights did not significantly affect the results (relative risk=1·08; 95 % CI 1·01, 1·15). The meta-regression analysis showed that for every increase of 10 mmol/d in Na intake, CVD mortality increased significantly by 1 % (P=0·016). Age, hypertensive status and length of follow-up were also associated with increased CVD mortality.ConclusionsHigher Na intake was associated with higher CVD mortality in the general population; this result suggests a reduction in Na intake to prevent CVD mortality from any cause.

Download Full-text