Results of High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5438-5438
Author(s):  
Kenneth A. Ault ◽  
Delvyn Caedren Case ◽  
Marjorie A. Boyd ◽  
Thomas J. Ervin ◽  
Frederick Aronson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Transplant Program ◽  
Maine Medical ◽  
Acute Myelogenous ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract 43 patients with acute myeloid leukemia have undergone transplantation at our institution over the past 14 years. Patient selection criteria included age less than 70 years, creatinine less than 2mg/ml, no active infection, cardiac ejection fraction >40%, DLCO > 50% of predicted and no other co-morbid conditions that would jeopardize survival. 39 patients were in first remission, 4 were in second or higher remission. 3 patients had favorable cytogenetics, 40 had intermediate or unfavorable cytogenetics. After achieving remission for at least 30 days, patients were consolidated with Etoposide and AraC, followed by G-CSF. Hematopoietic stem cells were collected when the WBC rebounded to at least 10,000/μl. The target dose of CD34 positive cells was 5×106/kg. The minimum dose given was 2.3 × 106/kg). High dose therapy consisted of Busulfan 1mg/kg and Etoposide 60mg/kg. The average age at transplantation was 42 years (range 20 to 61). Days of neutropenia (AGC<500/μl) ranged from 2 to 10 (average 5.2). The median length of follow up is 4.0 years. Kaplan-Meier progression-free survival is 38% at 5 years and 35% at 10 years. Currently 26 patients are alive, and 23 are free from progression. Overall survival is 60%. Maine Medical Center Autologous HPC Transplant Program Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Maine Medical Center Autologous HPC Transplant Program Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

scholarly journals Analyzing How Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Are Treated, an Institutional Experience

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5849-5849
Author(s):  
Christopher Allen Willner ◽  
Mohammad Muhsin Chisti ◽  
Michaela Soriano ◽  
James Huang
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Elderly Populations ◽  
Acute Myelogenous ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Rationale: Treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) remains a challenge in elderly populations, those with comorbid conditions, and patients with poor performance status indices. The optimal choice for induction therapy as well as further agent selection is unclear, and current guidelines recommend enrollment in a controlled clinical trial. Methods: Institutional cases of AML via an electronic medical record query performed in November 2017 containing cases of AML in patients 65 years of age or greater from 01/01/2000 to 06/21/2017 were extracted. Instances of acute myelogenous leukemia were identified by ICD codes. Age, gender, induction therapy, cytogenetics, molecular analyses, and overall survival were collected. Results: A total of 61 cases of AML in patients aged 65 or greater were identified, with those having incomplete data being excluded from analysis. The mean age of included patients was 78.9 years of age, 35 were male and 26 were female. 60 confirmed deaths were recorded. 26 patients received conventional 7+3 (42.6%), 22 received a hypomethylating agent (HMA) (31.1%), 16 (26.2%) did not receive treatment. Conclusion: Our institutional data showed overall survival was significantly longer when treated with 7+3, 354 days (95% CI [93, 614]), vs. 61 days (95% CI [15, 107]). Similarly, OS was significantly longer when treated with HMA, 303 days (95% CI [23, 583]). Risk of death, accordingly, was as follows: 7+3 HR .347 (.179-.672), HMA HR .348 (.173-.703). Our institutional mortality data reasonably reflected SEER data analysis reported by Medeiros et al concerning untreated patients, but trended toward a greater OS for those treated with 7+3 or HMA. Registry data, as well as our institutional data, demonstrate a survival benefit to intensive chemotherapy and palliative chemotherapy, while controlled trials have not shown this benefit consistently in elderly populations. Practices regarding induction therapy vary greatly between institutions. Determination of which elderly patients to treat with intensive therapy remains difficult. References: Almeida AM, Ramos F. Acute myeloid leukemia in the older adults. Leuk Res Rep. 2016;6:1-7. Eleni LD, Nicholas ZC, Alexandros S. Challenges in treating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Oncol. 2010;2010:943823. Medeiros BC, Satram-hoang S, Hurst D, Hoang KQ, Momin F, Reyes C. Big data analysis of treatment patterns and outcomes among elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients in the United States. Ann Hematol. 2015;94(7):1127-38. Disclosures Chisti: Eli Lilly: Speakers Bureau; Medscape: Honoraria; UpToDate: Honoraria.

Dose-related mucositis with hydroxyurea for cytoreduction in acute myeloid leukemia

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan L Trepte ◽  
Jessica J Auten ◽  
Stephen M Clark ◽  
Hendrik W van Deventer
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Dosing Strategies ◽  
Safety And Toxicity ◽  
Dosing Strategy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Hyperleukocytosis occurs in 15–20% of all newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients and requires emergent treatment with leukapheresis or hydroxyurea when accompanied by signs or symptoms of leukostasis. Currently, there is no standardized hydroxyurea dosing strategy, although usual dosing ranges from 50 to 150 mg/kg/day, and prescribing patterns vary significantly among oncologists and institutions. In addition to other hematologic and dermatologic toxicities, the use of hydroxyurea may be associated with significant mucositis and mucositis-related pain. The purpose of this study was to compare mucositis-related pain between two different hydroxyurea dosing strategies in patients who received hydroxyurea for cytoreduction during induction. A retrospective chart review of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with chemotherapy at UNC Medical Center from April 2014 to April 2016 who received at least one dose of hydroxyurea for cytoreduction was conducted. This study compared the safety and toxicity profiles of hydroxyurea in patients who received high-dose hydroxyurea (≥75 mg/kg/day) versus low-dose hydroxyurea (<75 mg/kg/day). Safety and toxicity were evaluated based on indicators of mucositis and cumulative intravenous narcotic requirements following induction chemotherapy. Data collection included baseline demographics, mucositis risk factors, baseline laboratory values, hydroxyurea dosing, mucositis indicators, and pain indicators. A total of 55 patients were included in the study, 21 patients (38.2%) received the high-dose hydroxyurea dosing strategy. The high-dose hydroxyurea dosing strategy had a significantly higher white blood cell count at diagnosis, increased duration of hydroxyurea, and received a higher cumulative dose of hydroxyurea. Additionally, the high-dose hydroxyurea dosing strategy patients were associated with significantly more grade 3 or 4 mucositis requiring a formulation change (0% versus 28.6%, p = 0.002) and significantly higher cumulative intravenous narcotic requirements during induction (p = 0.019). No significant differences in baseline demographics or mucositis risk factors between dosing strategies were identified. The high-dose hydroxyurea dosing strategy patients had a significant increase in cumulative intravenous narcotic requirements and formulation changes, both common interventions made for the treatment of mucositis. Additional studies are needed to further elucidate the safety and toxicity profiles of hydroxyurea dosing strategies and to explore the correlation between total cumulative hydroxyurea dose and total cumulative narcotic requirements.

scholarly journals The expression of PTEN and INPP4B and their clinical significance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 205873921985740
Author(s):  
Haobin Song ◽  
Yuanda Zhang ◽  
Yan Liu ◽  
Haiyan Hu ◽  
Qing Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Inositol Polyphosphate ◽  
Phosphatase And Tensin Homolog ◽  
Tensin Homolog ◽  
Acute Myelogenous ◽  
Acute Myeloid

This study investigates the expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II (INPP4B) in children with acute myeloid leukemia. The levels of PTEN and INPP4B in bone marrow, from 95 acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients and 84 controls, respectively, were assessed by immunohistochemistry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and Western blot. The prognosis was followed up and investigated and the correlation analysis was made. We found that the expression levels of PTEN and INPP4B were significantly lower in the AML group than those in the control group ( P < 0.05). The survival time was lower in PTEN and INPP4B negative children relative to PTEN and INPP4B positive children ( P < 0.05). In AML patients, INPP4B and PTEN expression was positively correlated (r = 0.552, P = 0.000). In conclusion, the levels of INPP4B and PTEN were reduced significantly and correlated positively in AML patients accompanying with abnormal karyotypes. The current investigation of INPP4B and PTEN could give new insight into targeted therapy for AML.

Marrow irradiation with high-dose 153Samarium-EDTMP followed by chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell infusion for acute myelogenous leukemia

2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1583-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilmarie Rodriguez ◽  
Peter M. Anderson ◽  
Mark R. Litzow ◽  
Linda Erlandson ◽  
Barbara A. Trotz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Acute Myelogenous

Randomized Phase II Study of Clofarabine-Based Consolidation for Younger Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1223-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
Stéphane de Botton ◽  
Sylvie Chevret ◽  
Denis Caillot ◽  
Emmanuel Raffoux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Nonhematologic Toxicity ◽  
Donor Identification ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a clofarabine-based combination (CLARA) versus conventional high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) as postremission chemotherapy in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods Patients age 18 to 59 years old with intermediate- or unfavorable-risk AML in first remission and no identified donor for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) were eligible. Two hundred twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive three CLARA or three HDAC consolidation cycles. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). To handle the confounding effect of SCT that could occur in patients with late donor identification, hazard ratios (HRs) of events were adjusted on the time-dependent treatment × SCT interaction term. Results At 2 years, RFS was 58.5% (95% CI, 49% to 67%) in the CLARA arm and 46.5% (95% CI, 37% to 55%) in the HDAC arm. Overall, 110 patients (55 in each arm) received SCT in first remission. On the basis of a multivariable Cox-adjusted treatment × SCT interaction, the HR of CLARA over HDAC before or in absence of SCT was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.98; P = .041). In a sensitivity analysis, when patients who received SCT in first remission were censored at SCT time, 2-year RFS was 53.3% (95% CI, 39% to 66%) in the CLARA arm and 31.0% (95% CI, 19% to 43%) in the HDAC arm (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.98; P = .043). Gain in RFS could be related to the lower cumulative incidence of relapse observed in the CLARA arm versus the HDAC arm (33.9% v 46.4% at 2 years, respectively; cause-specific HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.94; P = .025). CLARA cycles were associated with higher hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity than HDAC cycles. Conclusion These results suggest that CLARA might be considered as a new chemotherapy option in younger patients with AML in first remission.

New Strategies for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Including Antibodies and Other Novel Agents

Hematology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin S. Tallman
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Multidrug Resistance ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors ◽  
Younger Adults ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The prognosis for younger adults (≤ 55–60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has improved during the last four decades. However, there has been little progress in the treatment of older adults. This disappointing observation is important because the median age of patients with AML is about 70 years. Approximately 60%–80% of younger adults with AML achieve complete remission (CR) with the cytotoxic agents cytarabine and an anthracycline such as daunorubicin or idarubicin or the anthracenedione mitoxantrone. However, only 30%–40% of such patients are alive and disease-free at 5 years. Among older adults, CR is achieved in 40%–55%, but there are very few long-term survivors. Many studies have evaluated the impact of alternative doses and schedules, as well as additional cytotoxic drugs, on the prognosis for this group of patients. The outcome has not improved substantially beyond that achieved with conventional doses of an anthracycline and cytarabine followed by high-dose cytarabine consolidation. Several factors identified at diagnosis can predict outcome. The most important of these is the karyotype of the leukemic cells. Another critical factor is the presence of transmembrane transporter proteins, which confer multidrug resistance and mutations in or overexpression of specific genes such as WT1, C/EBPα, BAX, and BCL-2/BAX ratio, BAALC, EVI1, KIT and FLT3. The development of specific agents directed at gene mutations, signal transduction pathways and unique cell surface antigens provide the foundation for new therapeutic strategies. Such agents include the immunoconjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin, multidrug resistance inhibitors, farnesyltransferase inhibitors, histone deacetylase and proteosome inhibitors, antiangiogenesis agents, FLT3 inhibitors, apoptosis inhibitors, and nucleoside analogs. All of these agents can potentially address the heterogeneous abnormalities in AML and significantly improve the outcome for patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document