Bortezomib-Doxorubicin-Dexamethasone as Induction Prior to Reduced Intensity Autologous Transplantation Followed by Lenalidomide as Consolidation/Maintenance in Elderly Untreated Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 159-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Patrizia Falco ◽  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Vittorio Montefusco ◽  
Claudia Crippa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: New agents have been introduced as induction prior to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and as consolidation/maintenance thereafter to improve complete response (CR) rates. In this trial we evaluate Bortezomib plus Pegylated-lyposomal-doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (PAD) as induction therapy prior to reduced intensity ASCT, followed by consolidation with Lenalidomide and Prednisone (LP) and maintenance with Lenalidomide alone (L). Methods: Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients aged 65–75 years were eligible. Induction regimen consisted of 4 21-day PAD cycles (Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11, Pegylated-lyposomal-doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 4 and Dexamethasone 40 mg days 1–4, 8–11, 15–18). Two cycles of Cyclophosphamide 3 g/m2 plus Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor were used to harvest stem cells. Patients were conditioned with tandem Melphalan 100 mg/m2 (MEL100) followed by stem cell support. After ASCT patients received consolidation with 4 28-day LP cycles (Lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–21 plus, Prednisone 50 mg every other day) followed by Lenalidomide alone maintenance (10 mg days 1–21 every 28 day). Primary objectives were safety (grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity < 30%) and efficacy (near CR rate > 35%). Results: One-hundred and two patients have been enrolled. After PAD cycles at least partial response (PR) rate was 94%, at least very good partial response (VGPR) was 59% including 13% CR. After tandem MEL100, 88% of patients achieved at least VGPR and 41% CR. After LP consolidation all patients obtained PR, 88% at least VGPR and 53% immunofixation negative CR. After a median follow-up of 14 months, 1-year progression free survival (PFS) was 92%, 1 year time to progression was 97% and 1 year overall survival was 92%. PFS was not significantly affected β2-microglobulin levels (p=0.10), presence of chromosome 13 deletion (p=0.5) or t(4;14) (p=0.61). During PAD, grade 3–4 adverse events included thrombocitopenia (13%), neutropenia (11%), infections (18%), gastrointestinal toxicities (12%), peripheral neuropathy (11%) and deep vein thrombosis (6%). During LP consolidation, grade 3–4 toxicities included neutropenia (18%), thrombocytopenia (6%), infections (6%) and deep vein thrombosis (6%). The other grade 3–4 toxicities occurred in less than 5% of patients. Conclusions: Bortezomib as induction regimen prior to reduced intensity ASCT, followed by Lenalidomide as consolidation maintenance is a highly effective regimen in elderly patients. Updated results will be presented at the meeting.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 448-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Ilaria Avonto ◽  
Francesca Patriarca ◽  
Claudia Crippa ◽  
Maria T. Petrucci ◽  
...  

Abstract Bortezomib has been evaluated as induction regimen to improve cyto-reduction before autologous stem cell transplant. Combinations including bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone have shown encouraging results. Melphalan at 100 mg/m2 has been suggested as reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for elderly patients. In this prospective multicenter phase II study, bortezomib, pegylated-liposomal-doxorubicin and dexamethasone (PAD) followed by tandem melphalan 100 mg/m2 has been investigated in newly diagnosed patients aged 65–75 years. The induction regimen included four 21-day PAD cycles (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11, pegylated-liposomal-doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 4 and dexamethasone 40 mg days 1–4, 8–11, and 15–18 for cycle 1 and days 1–4 for cycles 2–4). Cyclophosphamide (3 g/m2) plus G-CSF were used to harvest stem cells. Patients were then conditioned with tandem melphalan 100 mg/m2 followed by stem cell infusion. A single interim analysis has been planned. Sixty-five patients have been enrolled in the study and 37 completed the induction cycles. Median age was 69 years; median β2-microglobulin 3 mg/L; median albumin 4.1 g/L; chromosome 13q deletion was detected by FISH in 35% of patients. After the 4 courses of PAD 97.1% of patients achieved at least a partial response (PR), 50% at least a very good partial response (VGPR), 11.8% an immunofixation negative complete remission (CR). After tandem melphalan 100 mg/m2, all patients achieved at least a PR, 80% at least a VGPR and 30% an immunofixation negative CR. After 4 cycles of PAD, grade 3–4 hematologic events were thrombocytopenia (13.5%) and neutropenia (8.1%); more frequent grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities were peripheral neuropathy (21.6%) and infections (10.8%). One early toxic death was reported (central nervous system bleeding) and two patients had to discontinue therapy due to pneumonia and HBV reactivation. Eighty-two percent of patients achieved successful stem cell harvest (>4 CD34+ cells/Kg). PAD is an effective induction approach, it may improve autologous transplant results in selected elderly patients. Updated results of the interim analysis will be presented at the meeting.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3611-3611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Kay Delasalle ◽  
Sergio Giralt ◽  
Raymond Alexanian

Abstract Introduction: Both bortezomib (B) and lenalidomide (L) are effective against relapsed/refractory and newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). The 3-drug combination of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone had induced remission in 87% of patients with untreated myeloma, significantly higher than the frequency of 66% observed with thalidomide dexamethasone. Patients and Method: We conducted a retrospective review of a pilot study in 17 previously-untreated patients with MM who were treated with bortezomib-lenalidomide dexamethasone between 4/06–4/07. Median age was 60 (35–71), median B2M was 3.7 mg/L (1.8–11.7) and median Hgb was 11 g/dl (6–14.7). Serum creatinine was greater than 2 mg/dl in one patient (6%). Bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1,4, 8 and 11; lenalidomide was at 25 mg orally daily for 21 days; and dexamethasone was at 20 mg/m2 daily orally for 4 days beginning on days 1, 9 and 17. Each cycle was 28 days. After the first cycle, a second cycle was given to 10 patients so that the median cycles of therapy was 2. As prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis, all patients received warfarin with a targeted INR range between 2–3. All patients received daily orally vancyclovir to prevent herpes zoster. Results: Applying the Blade criteria of response (PR: greater than 50% reduction of serum myeloma protein and/or greater than 90% reduction of Bence Jones protein), remission of disease was observed in 14/17 patients (82%), including 2 patients (12%) with CR based on negative immunofixations and 12 patients (70%) with PR. All but one patient achieved remission after 1 cycle of treatment. Three patients were resistant to bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone after 2 cycles. One patient had deep vein thrombosis with pulmonary emboli. One patient had short-term grade 3 neuropathy. One patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia and one patient had nonneutropenic pneumonia. Median nadir neutrophil count was 3000/ul (range 1400–5400/ul), and median nadir platelet count was 174 k/ul (range 38–270 k/ul). After a median 3.6 months (range 3.3–5.5), intensive therapy supported by autologous blood stem cells was given to 11 patients. Three of the 11 patients in PR after induction with bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone were converted to CR with intensification. Consequently, the CR rate after intensification 29%. Intensification is planned for the 3 patients with primary resistant MM. Discussion: Overall response and CR rates were similar to those observed previously among similar patients treated with bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone. All reported primary treatment programs based on bortezomib-dexamethasone have induced high response rates of 82–92%, regardless of whether melphalan, lenalidomide, or thalidomide were included. Conclusions: One or two cycles of bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone were associated with rapid onset of response in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma. Toxicity was infrequent due to short exposure to bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone. There was early access to intensive therapy supported by autologous stem cells. Reduced exposure to drugs given as primary treatment should help preserve disease sensitivity to later treatment upon relapse.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20528-e20528
Author(s):  
Brandon R. Shank ◽  
Brian Primeaux ◽  
Sandra B. Horowitz ◽  
Erin K. Yeung ◽  
Irene Y. Lee ◽  
...  

e20528 Background: RRMM can be associated with high disease burden and/or end organ damage requiring rapid disease control. Our group has previously published data with hyperCy-bortezomib (bor)-doxorubicin-dex (Tabchi et al. 2019) for such patients (pts). Dara, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, has limited overlapping toxicities with cytotoxic chemotherapy, making it an attractive partner for hyperCy-dex. We report our retrospective experience of pts treated with dara-hyperCy-dex ± car. Methods: Between 5/2016-8/2019, 53 pts were treated with dara (16 mg/kg IV d1,8,15,22)-hyperCy (300-350 mg/m2 IV q12h x 6-8 doses d1-3/4)-dex (20-40 mg IV/PO d1-4, 8-11, 15-18, 22-23) alone (27 records), or with car (20 mg/m2 IV d1-2, 27-36 mg/m2 IV d8-9, 15-16) (32 records) on 28 day cycles. Pts received growth factor, anti-fungal, anti-bacterial, anti-viral, and peptic ulcer prophylaxis. High-risk MM (HRMM) was defined by t(4;14), t(14;16), and/or del 17p. Response was assessed by International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were defined as ≥ partial response and ≥ stable disease, respectively. Each instance of treatment (tx) started > 60 days from the previous cycle start date was counted as a separate record. Patient characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed per pt, based on earliest administration date. Results: Median age of pts was 61 (26-77) years. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (1-18). Previous exposure to both lenalidomide and pomalidomide (93%), both bor and car (83%), and dara (64%) was frequent. HRMM was present in 20/42 evaluable pts. After a median of 1 cycle (1-5), ORR was 63%, with ≥ very good partial response in 24%. DCR was 86%. Median PFS was 4.3 months. Median OS was 9.7 months. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities included 66% neutropenia, 66% anemia, and 68% thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities included 42% febrile neutropenia, 19% bacteremia, and 15% pneumonia. Within 60 days of tx, 7 pts underwent autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), and 7 pts died. Conclusions: Dara-hyperCy-dex ± car demonstrates a high ORR and DCR in heavily treated and HRMM, allowing bridging of some pts to ASCT. High rates of hematologic toxicity and risk of infection are manageable with twice weekly monitoring for transfusion support, as well as early detection and intervention for infections. Rates of end organ damage reversal will be presented.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8002-8002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Laubach ◽  
Ajay K. Nooka ◽  
Craig Cole ◽  
Elizabeth O'Donnell ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
...  

8002 Background: Elotuzumab (elo) is approved for use in combination with lenalidomide (len) and dexamethasone (dex) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). This phase 2a study evaluated the efficacy and safety of elo in combination with len, subcutaneous bortezomib (bortez), and dex. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to determine the response rate of newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible MM patients (pts) after four cycles of therapy with elo plus len, bortez, and dex. Pts were newly diagnosed with MM by the revised IMWG criteria. Elo was administered days 1, 8, and 15 of the first two 28 day cycles and days 1 and 11 in cycles 3 and 4. Following cycle 4, pts underwent stem cell mobilization and could then proceed with either autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or defer transplant and receive four more cycles of induction therapy with elo plus len, bortez, and dex. Following either ASCT or 8 cycles of induction chemotherapy, pts transitioned to risk-adapted maintenance with elo, len, and dex plus every other week bortez (pts with high-risk cytogenetics, ISS stage II or III) or elo, len, dex (all others). Responses were assessed by the modified Uniform Response Criteria and toxicities graded based on NCI-CTCAE V4. Results: 41 patients with a median age of 60 were enrolled and this analysis encompasses response data from 29 patients. The overall response rate (ORR) after four cycles was 100%, with 24% achieving a complete response (CR), 47% achieving a very good partial response (VGPR), and 29% a partial response (PR). The rate of VGPR or better was 71%. The median number of CD34+ stem cells collected was 10.3 x 10^6. The most frequent grade 3 or higher toxicities included thrombocytopenia (15%) and hypophosphatemia (12%). The rate of grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was 2%. Two pts died while on study, one due to complications of septicemia and the other due to respiratory failure. Conclusions: The combination of elo plus len, bortez, and dex was effective in newly diagnosed, ASCT-eligible patients. The rate of high-grade toxicities was low, although there were two grade 5 events (septicemia and respiratory failure). Clinical trial information: NCT02375555.


2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (21) ◽  
pp. 4319-4323 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Suzanne Hayman ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Multiple myeloma is a malignancy of plasma cells and is characterized by increased marrow angiogenesis. Thalidomide, an agent with antiangiogenic properties, is effective in relapsed myeloma. We report the results of a study combining thalidomide and dexamethasone as initial therapy for myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with newly diagnosed myeloma were studied. Thalidomide was given at a dose of 200 mg/d orally. Dexamethasone was given at a dose of 40 mg/d orally on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 (odd cycles) and 40 mg/d on days 1 to 4 (even cycles), repeated monthly. RESULTS: Of all 50 patients, a confirmed response was seen in 32 patients yielding a response rate of 64% (95% confidence interval, 49% to 77%). Thirty-one patients (62%) proceeded to stem-cell collection after four cycles of therapy including 26 who underwent stem-cell transplantation and five who chose stem-cell cryopreservation. Major grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed in 16 patients (32%), and the most frequent were deep vein thrombosis (six patients), constipation (four patients), rash (three patients), and dyspnea (two patients). Three deaths occurred during active therapy because of a pancreatitis, pulmonary embolism, and infection. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the combination of thalidomide plus dexamethasone is a feasible and active regimen in the treatment of multiple myeloma. It merits further study as an oral alternative to infusional chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone and other intravenous regimens currently used as pretransplantation induction therapy for myeloma.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2867-2867
Author(s):  
Nilanjan Ghosh ◽  
Anna Ferguson ◽  
Xiaobu Ye ◽  
Carol A. Huff ◽  
Ivan M. Borrello

Abstract Abstract 2867 Poster Board II-843 Corticosteroids have historically been the backbone of most myeloma targeted therapies. However, they are often the major cause of toxicities, especially in elderly patients. In recent years, novel agents such as bortezomib and thalidomide have demonstrated significant anti-myeloma activity with increased overall response rates. We thus designed a study combining these two agents in a steroid-free regimen. Bortezomib (B) and thalidomide (T) were examined as first line treatment in 27 patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma between September 2004 and September 2006. Patients received B 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 every 21 days and T 150 mg daily for a maximum of 8 cycles. The overall response rate was 81.5%, with a near CR or greater of 25.8% and a CR (immunofixation negative) of 11%. A major response identified by greater than 90% reduction in the paraprotein was seen in 33% of the patients. Responses were rapid: median time to first response was 36.5 days (range, 14-101 days) and median time to best response was 61 days (range, 16-171 days). The most common grade 3 toxicities were peripheral neuropathy (22%), pneumonia (15%) and fatigue (7%). The only grade 3 hematologic toxicity was anemia (7%). No grade 4 toxicities were seen. 3 patients had mild peripheral neuropathy (PN) at baseline. PN was the most common reason for dose reduction with an average B dose of 1.1mg/m2 and T of 110mg daily. The major cause of discontinuation of treatment was PN. The PN completely resolved in 80% of the patients upon completion of therapy. No venous thromboembolic events (VTE) were observed even in the absence of prophylactic anticoagulation. It should be noted that upon completion of the study all patients received either B or T maintenance and no patients proceeded onto stem cell transplant immediately. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 16.8 months (95% CI 8.7-21.6 months). Median overall survival has not yet been reached at a median follow up of 39 months. The 3 year overall survival is 74%. This study demonstrates: 1) the excellent efficacy of a steroid-free regimen; 2) good PFS in the absence of stem cell transplantation; and 3) that most treatment-related PN resolves. Disclosures: Huff: Celgene: Consultancy. Borrello:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Mellenium: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 945-945
Author(s):  
Alexandra M. Levine ◽  
Anil Tulpule ◽  
Lynne Smith ◽  
Byron M. Espina ◽  
Ann F. Mohrbacher ◽  
...  

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma is an aggressive B cell tumor, with a median survival of approximately 3 years, despite treatment. While intensive therapy may be curative in some patients, the median age at diagnosis is in the 60’s, and such therapy is not always feasible. We developed a regimen of fludarabine, mitoxantrone and rituximab, comprised of fludarabine, 25 mg/m2, IV on days 1–3; mitoxantrone, 10mg/m2, IV on day 1, every 28 days for 6 cycles, along with rituximab, 375 mg/m2 given on day 1, of cycles 2 through 6, and then given alone for 3 weekly doses as cycle 7. To date, 14 male and 7 female patients with a median age of 60 years (range 41–87) have been accrued. Five patients (24 %) relapsed from prior systemic chemotherapy including stem cell transplantation in 1. All but 1 patient had either stage III (n=2) or stage IV disease (n=20). Sites of extranodal disease included bone marrow in 15 (71%), pleural effusions in 5 (24 %), and GI tract involvement in 3 (14 %) patients. Eight patients (38 %) had an intermediate or high IPI score. B symptoms were present in 7. On pathologic assessment, no patient had blastoid morphology. Cyclin D1 was expressed in 19 of 21 tissues tested. Treatment has been well tolerated; the most common side effect was transient grade 3 or 4 neutropenia reported in 17 (81 %) patients; transient grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in 3 patients; and anemia observed in 6 patients. No grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity has been reported. Of 20 evaluable patients, complete remissions (CR) have been documented in 18 (90 %). The median duration of complete remission is 17.4 months (range 1.1–29.9). Thirteen patients have relapsed after 1.1 to 29.9 months in CR. All 20 of the evaluable patients remain alive after a median follow-up of 16.4+ mos (range 1.0–39.6+). Combination therapy with fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and rituxan is a well tolerated regimen and is highly active in patients with both newly diagnosed and relapsed mantle cell lymphoma. While relapse is seen in the majority, the regimen is capable of inducing CR in 90 % and can be used safely in elderly patients and those who have relapsed or are not eligible for stem cell transplant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document