Single Agent Arsenic Trioxide in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Long Term Follow-up Data.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 846-846
Author(s):  
Vikram Mathews ◽  
Biju George ◽  
Kavitha M Lakshmi ◽  
Auro Viswabandya ◽  
Ezhilarasi Chendamarai ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 846 We had previously reported a well tolerated regimen using single agent arsenic trioxide (ATO) (Blood 2006:107; 2627) leading to durable remissions in patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Briefly, the regimen consisted of ATO (10mg/day for adults and 0.15mg/kg/day for pediatric patients) for up to 60 days in induction; this was followed by a 28 day consolidation after a 4 week break. Four weeks after completion of consolidation, patients received ATO for 10 days/month for 6 months. A concern with the previous report was the relatively short duration of follow up. Here we report the long term follow-up data of the same cohort. As previously reported, 72 newly diagnosed cases of APL were enrolled. 62 patients (86.1%) achieved hematological remission. The remaining died prior to achieving remission. There were no primary induction failures. Twenty two (30.6%) of these patients were considered good risk group (WBC count at diagnosis <5×109/L and a platelet count >20×109/L), the rest were considered high risk. Since publication of the last report an additional 7 patients have relapsed to give a total of 13 relapses, 2 were in the good risk group and the remaining 11 in the high risk group. The relapses in the good risk group were salvaged with an autologous SCT and have durable continued second remissions. The median time to relapse was 1.5 years. Five (38.52%) of these relapses occurred beyond 2 years and included both relapses in the good risk group. At a median follow-up of 58 months the 5-year Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS) and disease free survival (DFS) of the entire cohort was 74.22±5.26%, 68.93±5.52% and 80.00±5.17% respectively. The 5-year OS and EFS of the good risk and high risk group was 100±00% vs. 63.30±6.9% and 90.00±6.71% vs. 59.66±6.99% respectively. Beyond induction, all deaths followed relapse of disease. There were no second malignancies reported. Besides the previously reported toxicities, which were mild and transient in most cases, there were no new toxicities that were reported on continued follow up of these cases. Since completion of therapy, in spite of counseling and advising against pregnancy, 3 males and 4 females in the reproductive age group have had 8 normal children. No abortions, still births or fetal defects were reported among patients in the reproductive age group in this cohort. Hair and nail samples from 5 cases that had completed maintenance therapy more than 24 months earlier have been collected for analysis, the results of which are awaited. At our center the cost of administering this regimen is a quarter of that of a conventional ATRA plus anthracycline based regimen. Additionally, after the initial induction therapy the rest of the treatment did not require hospital admission nor did it result in any Grade III/IV hematological toxicity. Single agent ATO based regimen as reported previously is well tolerated, results in durable remissions and does not have any significant late side effects. In the good risk group it is associated with excellent clinical outcomes while in the high risk group additional interventions are probably required to reduce the risk of late relapses. In a resource constrained environment it is probably the best option. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (24) ◽  
pp. 3866-3871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram Mathews ◽  
Biju George ◽  
Ezhilarasi Chendamarai ◽  
Kavitha M. Lakshmi ◽  
Salamun Desire ◽  
...  

Purpose We previously reported our results with a single-agent arsenic trioxide (ATO) –based regimen in newly diagnosed cases of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The concern remained about the long-term outcome of this well-tolerated regimen. We report our long-term follow-up data on the same cohort. Patients and Methods From January 1998 to December 2004, 72 patients with PML/RARα+ APL were enrolled. All patients were treated with a single-agent ATO regimen. Results Overall 62 (86.1%) achieved a hematologic remission (complete remission). After the initial report, an additional seven patients have relapsed for a total of 13 relapses. There were no additional toxicities to report on follow-up. At a median follow-up 60 months, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimate (± SE) of event-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) was 69% ± 5.5%, 80% ± 5.2%, and 74.2% ± 5.2%, respectively. The OS in the good risk group as defined by us remains 100% over this period. Conclusion Single-agent ATO as used in this study in the management of newly diagnosed cases of APL is safe and is associated with durable responses. Results in the low-risk group are comparable to that reported with conventional therapy while additional interventions would probably be required in high-risk cases.


2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-316
Author(s):  
N Ramisetty ◽  
KM Krishnan ◽  
PF Partington

INTRODUCTION We performed a retrospective radiological audit of the hip resurfacings carried out in our trust over a five-year period. Abnormal cup inclination angle (CIA) and stem shaft angle (SSA) are recognised risk factors for revision in hip resurfacing. Our aims were to identify the CIA and SSA for hip resurfacings in our trust, to determine the revision rate in a CIA of ≥60° and an SSA of >0° varus, thereby identifying a high risk group for close, long-term follow up. METHODS A total of 247 patients underwent hip resurfacing in our trust between April 2003 and March 2008. The CIA and SSA were recorded. Of the 247 patients, 26 were excluded as there were no appropriate radiographs and so results were analysed for 221 patients. RESULTS The mean CIA was 47.6°. Over a third of the patients (34%) had a CIA of >50° and 13% had >60°. The mean SSA was 1.4° varus. Over two-thirds of the patients (67%) had a varus SSA. There were six revisions but one was excluded as it was secondary to infection. The revision rate was 10% in patients with a CIA of ≥60° and 1% in those with a CIA of <60° (p=0.017), and 1% in a varus and 4% in a valgus SSA (p>0.05) respectively. CONCLUSIONS The measurement of the CIA and SSA in hip resurfacings has identified a high risk group for close long-term follow up. There is already a 10% revision rate in those patients with a CIA of >60°. Hip resurfacing may generate a large revision burden in the ‘average’ surgeon's hands and all hospitals/surgeons should review their radiological outcomes critically and identify those at risk of revision.


2012 ◽  
Vol 61 (05) ◽  
pp. 379-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantin Alexiou ◽  
Elisabeth Schumann ◽  
Klaus Matschke ◽  
Sems Tugtekin ◽  
Manuel Wilbring

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1628-1628
Author(s):  
Sergio Siragusa ◽  
Alessandra Malato ◽  
Antonino Giarratano ◽  
Francesco Falaschi ◽  
Fernando Porro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Management of patients with suspected Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is problematic if diagnostic imaging is not available. Pretest Clinical Probability (PCP) and D-dimer (D-d) assessment were shown to be useful to identify those high risk patients for whom empirical, protective anticoagulation is indicated (Siragusa S et al. Arch Intern Med2004;164:2477–82). Objective of the study. In consecutive patients with suspected PE, we evaluated whether PCP and D-d assessment, together with the use of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), allow objective appraisal of PE to be deferred for up to 72 hours. Methods. In case of deferment of diagnostic imaging for PE, patients identified at high-risk (those with high PCP and those with moderate PCP and a positive D-d), received a protective full-dose treatment of LMWH; the remaining patients were discharged without anticoagulants. All patients were scheduled to undergo objective tests for PE (ventilation/perfusion lung scanning or computed tomography lung scan) within 72 hours from the index visit (figure). Standard antithrombotic therapy was then administered when diagnostic tests confirmed Venous ThromboEmbolism (VTE). Results. 336 patients with suspected PE were included in this study. The prevalence of VTE was 6.1% (95% CI 2.7–9.3) in the “low-risk group” and 50.4% (95% CI 41.7–59.1) in the “high-risk group”. In total, VTE was confirmed in 76 (22.6%) of 336 patients (95% CI 18.2–27). Patients’ characteristics, median time for deferral test and for LMWH administration are listed in table 1. Events at the short-term (72 hours) and long-term follow-up are listed in table 2. None of the patients had major bleeding events during the follow-ups. Conclusions. When objective diagnostic assessment of PE is not immediately available, management of symptomatic PE patients can prove highly unsatisfactory. This study demonstrates that a simple and reproducible approach allows a safe deferral of diagnostic imaging for PE for up to 72 hours. patients’ characteristics Baseline features Low risk group (n. 211) High-risk group (n. 125) p value n.s.: not significant Age in years (range) 59.3 (22–91) 60.3 (23–91) n.s. Sex (F/M) 98/113 59/66 n.s. Time since onset of symptoms (days) 1.7 1.5 n.s. Co-morbidity and 16 (7.5) 25 (19.2) 0.03 Median time of deferral test (hours) 49.5 42.5 n.s. Median time of protective anticoagulation (hours) not applicable 35.5 not applicable Outcome of Short- and Long-term FU Categories of patients (n) Events at the short-term FU Events at the long -term FU* FU indicates follow-up; CI indicates Confidence Intervals. *This refers to patients in whom Pulmonary Embolism has been previously ruled out (n. 260). “Low-risk group” (211) 0 (0%) [95% CI 1.4] 0 (0%) [95% CI 1.4] “High-risk group” (125) 1 (0.8%) [95% CI 2.3] 3 (2.4%) [95% CI 3.2] Patients clinically suspected of PE without immediate availability of diagnostic tests Patients clinically suspected of PE without immediate availability of diagnostic tests


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (20) ◽  
pp. 2753-2757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh ◽  
Kamran Alimoghaddam ◽  
Shahrbano Rostami ◽  
Seyed Hamidolah Ghaffari ◽  
Mohamad Jahani ◽  
...  

Purpose The long-term follow-up results of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) treated with all-trans retinoic acid and chemotherapy show high cure rates. Several studies have shown high efficacy of single-agent arsenic trioxide in newly diagnosed APL. However, long-term follow-up results are needed. Patients and Methods One hundred ninety-seven patients with newly diagnosed APL were treated with arsenic trioxide 0.15 mg/kg daily intravenous infusion until complete remission (CR). After achieving CR, the patients received one to four more courses of therapy with arsenic trioxide as consolidation and were observed with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction studies from peripheral blood (to detect of minimal residual disease) every 3 months or until relapse or death. Results The morphologic CR rate was 85.8%. The most common cause of remission failure was early death owing to APL differentiation syndrome (13.2%). The most important prognostic factor for early mortality was a high WBC count at presentation. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 66.7% ± 4% (SE). Relapse after 5 years in CR was rare. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate by intention-to-treat analysis was 64.4% ± 4%. In patients who achieved CR, OS and DFS were identical. Conclusion The long-term follow-up of newly diagnosed patients with APL treated with single-agent arsenic trioxide shows high rates of DFS and OS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory P. Swanson ◽  
Wencong Chen ◽  
Sean Trevathan ◽  
Michael Hermans

Background. Only truly long-term follow-up can determine the ultimate outcome in prostate cancer. Most studies have a median follow-up of less than 10 years and then project outcomes out to 15 and 20 years. We sought to follow patients for at least 20 years. Materials and Methods. We followed 754 prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy from 1988 to 1995 for a median follow-up (in survivors) of 23.9 years. We excluded lymph node and seminal vesicle positive patients and an additional 47 patients that did not have baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA). This left 581 patients for analysis. Results. With the factors of PSA, Gleason score, and extraprostatic extension/margin positivity, we could partition patients into three risk groups for biochemical failure (low, intermediate, and high). In further analysis, we found that the risk of metastatic disease in the first two groups was almost identical (4% and 5%, respectively), while it was 19% in the high-risk group. High-risk patients were those with PSA >20 ng/ml and/or Gleason >7, or Gleason 7 + PSA 10–20 + epe (and or margin) positive. They had a 22% prostate cancer mortality. Conclusion. In patients with truly long-term follow-up after prostatectomy for prostate cancer, the risk of metastatic disease and cancer death is very low. Patients with the lower risk findings do not appear to benefit from routine follow-up after 10 years free of biochemical recurrence. With a higher risk of later failure, we recommend that the higher risk patients be followed at least intermittently for another 5 years (out to 15 years).


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1910-1910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Jackson ◽  
Charlotte Pawlyn ◽  
David Cairns ◽  
John R Jones ◽  
Bhuvan Kishore ◽  
...  

Background: Immunomodulatory (IMiD) compounds are effective therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) acting via modulation of the CUL4 E3-ubiquitin ligase cereblon. Based on their structure individual IMiD compounds have different substrate specificities altering both their efficacy and side effect profile. These mechanistic differences impact the optimum sequencing of these agents as induction and maintenance. Within the UK NCRI Myeloma XI trial we compared triplet induction regimens containing Lenalidomide (Len) or Thalidomide (Thal) and maintenance treatment with Len or observation. With extensive long term follow up data we have explored the interaction of the induction and maintenance use of Thal and Len before and after ASCT. Methods: Myeloma XI is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial for newly diagnosed MM, with pathways for transplant eligible (TE) and non-eligible patients. TE patients were randomized between Len or Thal plus cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CRD vs CTD) continued for a minimum of 4 cycles and to max. response. For patients with a suboptimal response there was a subsequent randomization to intensification with a proteasome inhibitor containing triplet or no further therapy prior to ASCT. A maintenance randomization at 3 months post ASCT compared Len till disease progression vs observation (Obs). Analyses by molecular risk strata were pre-specified in the protocol. Adverse cytogenetic abnormalities were defined as gain(1q), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), or del(17p): standard risk (SR, no adverse cytogenetic abnormalities), high risk (HiR, one adverse cytogenetic abnormality), or ultra-high risk (UHiR, two or more adverse cytogenetic abnormalities). Results: 2042 TE patients were randomized to CRD n=1021 and CTD n=1021. After a median follow up of 68 months (interquartile range 49-83) for the induction randomization, 1378 PFS and 728 OS primary endpoint events had occurred. Patients received a median (range) of 5 (1-18) cycles of CRD and 5 (1-13) cycles of CTD induction therapy. There were higher rates of haematological toxicity with CRD and peripheral neuropathy with CTD. CRD induction was associated with a significantly improved median PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95%CI 0.77, 0.96, CRD 36 months vs CTD 33 months, P=0.005, Figure 1A) and median OS (HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.70, 0.93, CRD 96 months vs CTD 85 months, P=0.004, Figure 1B). Responses were deeper with CRD (>=VGPR 65.3%, PR 24.5%) than CTD (>=VGPR 52.8%, PR 33.2%) and depth of response was associated with outcome. Significant heterogeneity in PFS outcome was identified between molecular risk groups with HiR and UHiR benefiting most from induction with CRD rather than CTD (SR HR 0.99 [95%CI 0.79, 1.24], HiR HR 0.58 [0.44, 0.78], UHiR HR 0.60 [0.38, 0.94], P.het 0.01). 897 TE patients were randomized to Len (n=496) and Obs (n=401). After a median follow up of 68 months (interquartile range 51-84) for the maintenance randomization, 527 PFS primary endpoint events had occurred. Lenalidomide was associated with a significant improvement in PFS compared to observation (median PFS Len 64 [54,76] vs Obs 32 [28,36], HR 0.52 [0.45,0.61], P<0.001). This was consistent across all risk subgroups (SR HR 0.44 [95%CI 0.34, 0.56], HiR HR 0.50 [0.37, 0.67], UHiR HR 0.52 [0.31, 0.87], P. het 0.87). Optimum outcomes were seen in those receiving Len as both induction and maintenance therapy (Figure 1C). Patients receiving CRD induction followed by Len maintenance (CRD-R) had a median PFS of 77 months [56, 86] compared to CTD-R 64 [49, 74], CRD-Obs 37 [33, 42] and CTD-Obs 44 [38, 51]. Conclusions: In this study the use of Len as both induction and maintenance was associated with the best outcomes irrespective of cytogenetic risk group. With long term follow up CRD induction for newly diagnosed transplant eligible myeloma patients was associated with both a PFS and OS benefit compared to CTD and was better tolerated. The PFS impact of CRD was particularly notable in patients with high and ultra-high risk disease. Lenalidomide maintenance was associated with significantly longer PFS than observation across all risk groups. on behalf of the NCRI Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group Disclosures Jackson: Celgene, Amgen, Roche, Janssen, Sanofi: Honoraria. Pawlyn:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Amgen, Celgene, Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen, Janssen, Celgene, Takeda: Other: Travel expenses. Cairns:Celgene, Amgen, Merck, Takeda: Other: Research Funding to Institution. Jones:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kishore:Celgene, Takeda, Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene, Jazz, Takeda: Other: Travel expenses. Garg:Janssen, Takeda, Novartis: Other: Travel expenses; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis, Janssen: Research Funding. Lindsay:Celgene: Other: personal fees and non-financial support ; Takeda: Other: personal fees and non-financial support ; Amgen: Other: non-financial support. Russell:Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; DSI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jenner:Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, Sanofi Genzyme, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cook:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Drayson:Abingdon Health: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Owen:Janssen: Other: Travel expenses; Celgene, Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Gregory:Abbvie, Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen, Merck: Research Funding. Kaiser:Takeda, Janssen, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene, Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen, Amgen, Abbvie, Karyopharm: Consultancy. Davies:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Roche, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Consultant/Advisor; Janssen, Celgene: Other: Research Grant, Research Funding. Morgan:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Celgene Corporation: Other: Travel expenses; Celgene Corporation, Janssen: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: CTD/CRD induction therapy and Lenalidomide maintenance 10mg 21/28 days


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Valvano ◽  
Giorgio Bosso ◽  
Valentina Apuzzi ◽  
Valentina Mercurio ◽  
Valeria Di Simone ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document