Prospective Canadian Trial In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with t(4;14): Bortezomib-Based Therapy without ASCT

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1968-1968
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Giovanni Piza Rodriguez ◽  
Andrew Belch ◽  
David Szwajcer ◽  
Michael J. Kovacs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Post Induction ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1968 Two previous studies have reported that multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) with t(4;14), identified by FISH cytogenetics, experience a median progression-free survival (PFS) of only 8–9 mos and median overall survival (OS) of 18 mos when treated with a single ASCT (Chang H, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 36: 793; Gertz M, et al. Blood 2005; 106: 2837). On the other hand, the novel agent bortezomib is efficacious in relapsed myeloma pts with t(4;14). Based on these observations, we designed a phase II protocol for newly diagnosed MM pts with t(4;14) that consists of induction with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib and dexamethasone (DBD) × 4 cycles, followed by post-induction therapy with oral cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 days 1,8 15, 22 with bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 days 1,8,15 and prednisone 100 mg q 2 days of a 28-day cycle (CyBor-P) × 8 additional cycles. Maintenance therapy with dexamethasone (dex) 40 mg/month was then administered until progression. Although elective stem cell collection was recommended after induction, routine ASCT was not performed in the absence of disease progression. Between February 2008-July 2010, the bone marrows of 201 newly diagnosed MM pts were screened for t(4;14) in 7 Canadian centers, and 31 (15.4%) were found to be positive by FISH. Five pts did not meet the criteria for symptomatic MM, 4 had received ≥ 2 mos of prior therapy, 1 refused treatment and 2 were ineligible due to peripheral neuropathy or renal failure. Nineteen pts have been entered onto study. One of these was later determined to have a variant abnormality of chromosome 4 but not t(4;14) and underwent ASCT after induction; this pt is included in the safety analysis only. The median age was 60 yrs (45-69) and 53% were male. The median percent nuclei positive for t(4;14) was 26% (3-44%), serum β2-microglobulin was 318 nmol/L (43-1695) and albumin was 36 g/L (28-48); 6 pts had ISS stage 1, 6 had stage 2 and 5 had stage 3 MM. Immunoglobulin subtype included IgGκ (5), IgGλ (4), IgAκ (3), IgAλ (4), λ LC (1) and nonsecretory (1). To date, 15 pts have commenced DBD induction (57 total cycles administered), 12 have started post-induction CyBor-P (67 total cycles) and 6 are on maintenance dex (35 total cycles). Using modified Uniform criteria, the best response in 15 evaluable pts includes: sCR in 3 (20%), CR in 3 (20%), VGPR in 6 (40%), PR in 1 (6.7%) and stable disease in 2 (13.3%). Four have progressed a median of 3 mos (1-11) after commencing induction; one who progressed through DBD remains in nCR 1.5 yrs after salvage D-PACE followed by ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance. Fourteen SAEs occurred, of which 11 were grade 3 and 0 were grade 4; 5 pts developed grade 2 peripheral neuropathy (numbness and tingling) during induction with DBD. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 2/0 pts, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 2/1 pts, respectively. Two pts have died, due to MM progression in 1 and complex medical problems including syringomyelia with progressive weakness/ruptured diverticuli/depression in another who withdrew consent despite achieving VGPR with induction. Median follow-up (F/U) is 9.4 mos (1-23). Actuarial PFS is 66% (95% CI 42–100%) and overall survival is 92% (95%CI 79–100%) at 1 year. We conclude: 1) the incidence of t(4;14) by FISH in newly diagnosed MM pts is 15.4% as expected; 2) 26% of newly diagnosed pts with this entity have asymptomatic MM; 3) this bortezomib-based regimen is well-tolerated; 4) the overall response rate (sCR + CR + VGPR + PR) is 87%; 5) preliminarily, the 1-year PFS and OS with this approach compare favorably with reports of single ASCT in t(4;14) positive MM, although longer follow-up is required. Disclosures: Reece: Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bortezomib as first line therapy in myeloma. Chen:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Kukreti:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Anglin:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Trudel:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria.

Efficacy of Melphalan and Prednisone Plus Thalidomide in Patients Older Than 75 Years With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: IFM 01/01 Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 3664-3670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Philippe Rodon ◽  
Brigitte Pegourie ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Until recently, melphalan and prednisone were the standards of care in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. The addition of thalidomide to this combination demonstrated a survival benefit for patients age 65 to 75 years. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial investigated the efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed myeloma. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and December 2006, 232 previously untreated patients with myeloma, age 75 years or older, were enrolled and 229 were randomly assigned to treatment. All patients received melphalan (0.2 mg/kg/d) plus prednisone (2 mg/kg/d) for 12 courses (day 1 to 4) every 6 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg/d of oral thalidomide (n = 113) or placebo (n = 116), continuously for 72 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. Results After a median follow-up of 47.5 months, overall survival was significantly longer in patients who received melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide compared with those who received melphalan and prednisone plus placebo (median, 44.0 v 29.1 months; P = .028). Progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group (median, 24.1 v 18.5 months; P = .001). Two adverse events were significantly increased in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group: grade 2 to 4 peripheral neuropathy (20% v 5% in the melphalan and prednisone plus placebo group; P < .001) and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (23% v 9%; P = .003). Conclusion This trial confirms the superiority of the combination melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide over melphalan and prednisone alone for prolonging survival in very elderly patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Toxicity was acceptable.

scholarly journals Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02259
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly and selectively releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. The phase II HORIZON trial evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a population with an important unmet medical need. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RRMM refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received melflufen 40 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus once weekly oral dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg in patients older than 75 years). The primary end point was overall response rate (partial response or better) assessed by the investigator and confirmed by independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The primary analysis is complete with long-term follow-up ongoing. RESULTS Of 157 patients (median age 65 years; median five prior lines of therapy) enrolled and treated, 119 patients (76%) had triple-class–refractory disease, 55 (35%) had extramedullary disease, and 92 (59%) were refractory to previous alkylator therapy. The overall response rate was 29% in the all-treated population, with 26% in the triple-class–refractory population. In the all-treated population, median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 11.6 months at a median follow-up of 14 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 96% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (79%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (43%). Pneumonia (10%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic event. Thrombocytopenia and bleeding (both grade 3/4 but fully reversible) occurred concomitantly in four patients. GI events, reported in 97 patients (62%), were predominantly grade 1/2 (93%); none were grade 4. CONCLUSION Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including those with triple-class–refractory and extramedullary disease.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous Administration of Bortezomib in Combination with Thalidomide and Dexamethasone for Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenghao Wu ◽  
Cuiping Zheng ◽  
Songyan Chen ◽  
Xiaoping Cai ◽  
Yuejian Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Subcutaneous Administration ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Other ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Objective. To investigate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients with the therapy of subcutaneous (subQ) administration of bortezomib and dexamethasone plus thalidomide (VTD) regimen.Methods. A total of 60 newly diagnosed MM patients were analyzed. 30 patients received improved VTD regimen (improved VTD group) with the subQ injection of bortezomib and the other 30 patients received conventional VTD regimen (VTD group).The efficacy and safety of two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Results. The overall remission (OR) after eight cycles of treatment was 73.3% in the VTD group and 76.7% in the improved VTD group (P>0.05). No significant differences in time to 1-year estimate of overall survival (72% versus 75%,P=0.848) and progression-free survival (median 22 months versus 25 months;P=0.725) between two groups. The main toxicities related to therapy were leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, fatigue, and renal and urinary disorders. Grade 3 and higher adverse events were significantly less common in the improved VTD group (50%) than VTD group (80%,P=0.015).Conclusions. The improved VTD regimen by changing bortezomib from intravenous administration to subcutaneous injection has noninferior efficacy to standard VTD regimen, with an improved safety profile and reduced adverse events.

A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Study of Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide (VMPT) Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP) in Elderly Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 652-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Valeria Magarotto ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Gastrointestinal Complications ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Weekly Infusion ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: In newly diagnosed myeloma patients the combination of bortezomib with melphalan-prednisone (VMP) was superior to MP. In relapsed-refractory patients the 4 drug combination of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (VMPT) induced a high proportion of complete responses (CR). Methods: Newly diagnosed myeloma patients (N=393) older than 65 years, from 58 centers in Italy, were randomly assigned to receive VMPT (N=193) or VMP (N=200). Initially, patients were treated with nine 6-week cycles of VMPT (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,4,8,11,22,25,29,32 in cycles 1–4 and days 1,8,22,29 in cycles 5–9; melphalan 9 mg/m2 days 1–4; prednisone 60 mg/m2 days 1–4 and thalidomide 50 mg days 1–42, followed by bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every 15 days and thalidomide 50 mg/day as maintenance) or VMP (bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone at the same doses and schedules previously described without maintenance). In March 2007, the protocol was amended: both VMPT and VMP schedules were changed to nine 5-week cycles and bortezomib schedule was modified to weekly administration (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,8,15,22 in cycles 1–9). Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Patient characteristics were similar in both groups: median age was 71 years, 23% of patients were aged > 75 years. Patients who received at least 1 cycle were evaluated: 152 patients for VMPT (62 received bortezomib bi-weekly infusion and 90 weekly infusion) and 152 patients for VMP (62 received bortezomib bi-weekly infusion and 90 weekly infusion). Data were analyzed in intention-to-treat. The very good partial response (VGPR) rate was higher in the VMPT group (55% versus 42%, p=0.02), including a CR rate of 31% in the VMPT group and 16% in the VMP group (p=0.003). In the subgroup treated with weekly infusion of bortezomib, VGPR was 59% for VMPT and 37% for VMP (p=0.004), including 28% CR for VMPT and 10% for VMP (p=0.004). Subgroup analyses did not show any statistical difference between responses and either age, B2-microglobulin or chromosomal abnormalities, such as del13, t(4;14), t(14;16) and del17. After a median follow-up of 13.6 months, the 2-year PFS was 83.9% in the VMPT group and 75.7% in the VMP group (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.38–1.42, p=0.35). In patients who received weekly infusion of bortezomib, the 2-year PFS was 86.8% in the VMPT group and 78.1% in the VMP group (HR=0.65, 95% CI 0.24–1.8, p=0.41). In patients who achieved CR after induction, the 2-year PFS was 100% for VMPT and 79% for VMP (p=0.02). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 89.5% in the VMPT group and 88.7% in the VMP group (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.43–2.46, p=0.96). The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) was similar in both groups. In the VMPT patients and in the VMP patients, the more frequent AEs were neutropenia (36% vs 31%), thrombocytopenia (20% vs 19%), peripheral neuropathy (18% vs 12%), infections (14% vs 10%), and gastrointestinal complications (7% vs 8%), respectively. The weekly infusion of bortezomib significantly decreased the incidence of grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy (9% for VMPT and 3% for VMP). Conclusion: VMPT is superior to VMP in terms of response rates. Longer follow-up is needed to assess their effects on PFS and OS. The weekly infusion of bortezomib significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy without influencing outcome. Table. Complete responses, progression-free survival and peripheral neuropathy in all patients and in those who received weekly infusion of bortezomib VMPT group (n=152) VMP group (n=152) All patients (n=152) Subgroup with bortezomib weekly infusion (n=90) All patients (n=152) Subgroup with bortezomib weekly infusion (n=90) CR rate (%) 31 28 16 10 2-year PFS (%) 84 87 76 78 Grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy (%) 18 9 12 3

Patient Outcomes with Proteosome Inhibitor Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma at an English District General Hospital

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5745-5745
Author(s):  
Anil Vaikunth Kamat ◽  
Tariq Shafi ◽  
Raphael A. Ezekwesili
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Second Primary Malignancies

Abstract Bortezomib is a targeted proteosome inhibitor licensed & approved for in multiple myeloma both as first line and in relapsed setting. This is a retrospective non experimental cross sectional quantitative comparative group study using clinical case notes, laboratory & pharmacy records for patients treated with Bortezomib in 2011 & 2012. Outcomes studied included remission status, adverse events, progression free survival and overall survival at follow up. The study also looked at the comparative responses of cohort of patients administered Bortezomib through intravenous & subcutaneous route. The cohort consisted of 33 patients, 21 male, 11 female, median age 71 years, first line 10 patients, second line 23 , median number of cycles in 2011 & 2012 – first line 3 & 8 , second line 5 & 4, respectively. In 2011, 8 received intravenous treatment, 9 were switched from intravenous to subcutaneous route whilst all patients from 2012 received subcutaneous Bortezomib. The most frequently used regimen was Bortezomib Dexamethasone ( VD). The overall response rate ( ORR >/= Minor Response) was: First line 70% (7/10) ; Second line 47.8% ( 11/23); median PFS ( Figure 1) 6 months ( First line: 7 months ; Second line : 6 months) and median overall survival ( Figure 2) at follow up: 9 months ; 39.4 % ( 13/33) First line 8.5 months, Second line 11 months. Subcutaneous Bortezomib was equivalent to intravenous Bortezomib in terms of efficacy & tolerance. Of 33 patients, there were 12 dose reductions. Adverse events reported included: peripheral Neuropathy - grade 3 - 6% ( all grades 27.3%); Diarrhoea - grade 3 - 3% (all grades 6%); Nausea / Vomiting - grade 3 - 3% ( all grades 6%) and Second Primary Malignancies - 12% ( 4 of 33). Mortality at follow up was 20 patients from cohort of 33 ; causes included disease progression in 11, second primary malignancy with disease progression in 4, COPD 2, Systemic Amyloidosis 2, Tuberculosis 1 , Multiple co morbidities 1 and Asthma with mechanical failure in single patient. Second primary malignancies ( 4/33) included Prostate carcinoma ( 1), Renal Cell Carcinoma (1), Neuroendocrine tumour ( 1 ) and Unknown Primary in single patient. Beyond second line treatment, majority (14 of 23 patients; 60.9 %) did not have further active treatment. These data indicate that patient outcomes were modest compared to published data from VISTA and APEX trials. Majority of patients did not have further active treatment beyond second line which suggests the most effective treatment strategy should be used upfront as patients may not be fit to have further lines of therapy despite availability of recently introduced novel targeted agents. A higher percentage of second primary malignancies were noticed in this cohort which should be an area of further clinical research. Figure 1: Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2: Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2:. Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) has improved overall survival in multiple myeloma. This randomized trial compared VMP plus thalidomide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) with VMP in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 511 patients who were not eligible for transplantation to receive VMPT-VT (nine 5-week cycles of VMPT followed by 2 years of VT maintenance) or VMP (nine 5-week cycles without maintenance). Results In the initial analysis with a median follow-up of 23 months, VMPT-VT improved complete response rate from 24% to 38% and 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) from 41% to 56% compared with VMP. In this analysis, median follow-up was 54 months. The median PFS was significantly longer with VMPT-VT (35.3 months) than with VMP (24.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P < .001). The time to next therapy was 46.6 months in the VMPT-VT group and 27.8 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.52; P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was greater with VMPT-VT (61%) than with VMP (51%; HR, 0.70; P = .01). Survival from relapse was identical in both groups (HR, 0.92; P = .63). In the VMPT-VT group, the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (22%), peripheral neuropathy (11%), and cardiologic events (11%). All of these, except for thrombocytopenia, were significantly more frequent in the VMPT-VT patients. Conclusion Bortezomib and thalidomide significantly improved OS in multiple myeloma patients not eligible for transplantation.

scholarly journals Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Christopher P Venner ◽  
Nizar J Bahlis ◽  
Fritz Offner ◽  
Darrell White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Feasible Option ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Continuous Dosing

Continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd)-based regimens are among the standards of care in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib is suitable for continuous dosing, with predictable, manageable toxicities. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM2 trial transplant-ineligible NDMM patients were randomized to ixazomib 4 mg (n = 351) or placebo (n = 354) plus Rd. After 18 cycles, dexamethasone was discontinued; treatment continued using reduced-dose ixazomib (3 mg) and lenalidomide (10 mg) until progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Median PFS (mPFS) was 35.3 vs 21.8 months with ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.830; 95% confidence interval, 0.676-1.018; P = .073; median follow-up, 53.3 and 55.8 months). Complete (26% vs 14%; odds ratio [OR], 2.10; P &lt; .001) and ≥ very good partial response (63% vs 48%; OR, 1.87; P &lt; .001) rates were higher with ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd. In a prespecified high-risk cytogenetics subgroup, mPFS was 23.8 vs 18.0 months (HR, 0.690; P = .019). Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mostly grade 1/2. With ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd, 88% vs 81% of patients experienced grade ≥3 TEAEs, 66% vs 62% serious TEAEs, and 35% vs 27% TEAEs resulting in regimen discontinuation; 8% vs 6% died on study. Ixazomib-Rd is a feasible option for certain patients who can benefit from an all-oral triplet combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01850524).

Analysis of 179 Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Treated with Novel Agents Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT): a Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1343-1343
Author(s):  
Joyce Habib ◽  
Neil Dunavin ◽  
Gary Phillips ◽  
Patrick Elder ◽  
Meaghan Tranovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Genetic Profile ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 1343 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy in the United States with an estimated 20,580 new cases in 2009. Over the past decade, the introduction of novel agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib) have played a pivotal role in improving response rates, duration of response, overall survival (OS) and quality of life. In this study we describe a single center experience with novel agents used for induction followed by high dose chemotherapy (HDT) and first autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with MM. Method: A retrospective review of the medical records of 179 newly diagnosed patients with MM seen between October 2006 and December 2009 at The Ohio State University was performed. All patients received novel therapy containing thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide as part of an induction regimen followed by ASCT. All patients received melphalan 140mg/m2 or 200mg/m2 as preparative regimen. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to plot progression free survival and overall survival. Results: Of the 181 patients seen, 2 were excluded because they did not receive a novel agent as part of induction treatment. Of the 179 patients analyzed, median age was 56.8 years (29-80) with 30% of patients older than 60 years. African American represented 19%. Fifty-nine percent were male, 80% had Durie-Salmon (DS) stage III while 25%, 28%, 18% represented International prognostic score (IPS) stage I, II, and III respectively with 27% unknown. Median comorbidity index score was 2 (2-7) and median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 90% (70-100). Thirty percent had high risk genetic profile, and 73% received one line of treatment before ASCT. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 8.33 months (4-58). The overall response rate (ORR) prior to transplant was 84% (9% complete (CR), 29% very good partial (VGPR), and 46% partial (PR)). The ORR post ASCT was 89% (CR 45%, VGPR 22%, PR 21%). Non relapse mortality was 1% and 3% at 100 days and 1 year respectively. At a median follow up of 31 months (7-90), 69 patients (38%) had relapsed. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 29 months with 1 and 3 years PFS of 79.3% and 61.5% respectively (Fig. 1). The OS was not reached. One and 3 years OS were 93% and 88% respectively (Fig. 1). Univariate analysis showed that time to transplant > 12 months was associated with poor outcome and decreased overall survival (HR 3.30, p = 0.008). High risk genetic profile was also found to be associated with decreased overall survival although this was not statistically significant (HR 2.31, p = 0.070). Multivariate analysis found that only time to transplant > 12 months was an independent predictor of decreased OS. Significant predictors for disease progression were high risk genetic profile and time to transplant > 12 months in patients receiving 2 or more treatments before ASCT. Conclusion: Induction with novel agents followed by HDT and ASCT improves CR rate, in our case from 9% to 45%. Median PFS (29 months) was comparable to other published data. OS was not been reached after a median follow up of 31 months. Predictors of progression include high risk genetic profile and time to transplant > 12 months. The only significant predictor for survival was time to transplant. Our study suggests that an early transplant may improve OS and PFS. An extended analysis will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Phillips: NCI/NIH: Research Funding; NCCM Grant: Research Funding; ARRA RC2 Grant: Research Funding. Byrd:Genzyme Corporation: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (8) ◽  
pp. 936-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Voorhees ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
Jacob Laubach ◽  
Douglas W. Sborov ◽  
Brandi Reeves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat

Abstract Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard frontline therapy for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The addition of daratumumab (D) to RVd (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible NDMM patients was evaluated. Patients (N = 207) were randomized 1:1 to D-RVd or RVd induction (4 cycles), ASCT, D-RVd or RVd consolidation (2 cycles), and lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus D maintenance (26 cycles). The primary end point, stringent complete response (sCR) rate by the end of post-ASCT consolidation, favored D-RVd vs RVd (42.4% vs 32.0%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82; 1-sided P = .068) and met the prespecified 1-sided α of 0.10. With longer follow-up (median, 22.1 months), responses deepened; sCR rates improved for D-RVd vs RVd (62.6% vs 45.4%; P = .0177), as did minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10−5 threshold) rates in the intent-to-treat population (51.0% vs 20.4%; P &lt; .0001). Four patients (3.8%) in the D-RVd group and 7 patients (6.8%) in the RVd group progressed; respective 24-month progression-free survival rates were 95.8% and 89.8%. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were more common with D-RVd. More infections occurred with D-RVd, but grade 3/4 infection rates were similar. Median CD34+ cell yield was 8.2 × 106/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 × 106/kg for RVd, although plerixafor use was more common with D-RVd. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were comparable. Daratumumab with RVd induction and consolidation improved depth of response in patients with transplant-eligible NDMM, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02874742.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone with and without Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Interim Study Results,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4142-4142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijun Dai ◽  
Amy O'Sullivan ◽  
Ryan Kennedy ◽  
Mohammad Abbas ◽  
Yongli Shuai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4142 Introduction: High dose chemotherapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as opposed to conventional chemotherapy improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM) and is currently the standard of care for newly diagnosed MM patients less than 65 years old. Over the last decade, novel agents such as lenalidomide or bortezomib have dramatically improved MM outcomes with similar response rates as ASCT and the role of upfront ASCT has become more controversial. Therefore the goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine the role of upfront ASCT in newly diagnosed myeloma patients receiving novel agent lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone induction. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with newly confirmed, measurable MM in stage 2 and 3 (Salmon Durie) and meeting CRAB criteria were enrolled. Patients were randomized to transplant (Arm A) or to non-transplant (Arm B). Patients in Arm A received 4 cycles of lenalidomide (25mg days 1 – 21) plus low-dose dexamethasone (40mg days 1,8,15,22) followed by ASCT conditioned with 200 mg/m2 melphalan (LD+ASCT); Arm B patients received 8 cycles of lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (LD alone). Both arms received stem cell collection after 4 cycles of therapy if patients achieved at least a partial remission (PR). Patients with stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) went off study. The primary objective was to compare best response. The secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and evaluation of secondary malignancies in both arms. Results: From February 2008 to May 2011, 44 patients with newly diagnosed MM were randomized. The patient characteristics were as follow: median age of the patients was 61.7 years (range 48∼75), 45.5% female and 55.5% male patients, ISS stage I 31%, II 51% and III 18%. 40 patients were eligible for evaluation and 20 patients were randomized to Arm A or Arm B, respectively. The data were analyzed according to latest IMWG response criteria (Blood. 2011 May 5;117(18):4691–5). In an intention to treat analysis, patients in Arm A (LD + ASCT), achieved a 100% Overall Response Rate (ORR) with 40% PR (n=8) and 60% Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) (n=12). In Arm B (LD only) the ORR was 75% (n=15), including 15% CR (n=3), 35% VGPR (n=7), 25% PR (n=5), 20% SD (n=4) and 5% PD (n=1). The ORR was significantly superior in the LD+ASCT group compared to LD alone (p=0.047). After a median follow-up of 25.3 months, 17 patients have PD (8 in LD+ASCT and 9 in LD alone), 6 have died (1 in LD+ASCT and 5 in LD alone). DOR, PFS and OS were not significantly different in both groups. OS showed a trend to be superior in patients treated with LD+ASCT (p=0.08). (Table 1). One patient in the LD+ASCT arm developed MDS 13 months after start of therapy. Conclusion: Our interim analysis of an ongoing clinical study suggests that treatment of newly diagnosed MM patients with lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone induction followed by upfront ASCT resulted in significantly improved ORR. There was no difference in terms of DOR or PFS with a trend of superior OS in the LD+ASCT group. The study requires careful interpretation based on the low patient number and relatively short follow up, but supports the continued role of upfront consolidative ASCT in newly diagnosed MM patients. The incidence of secondary malignancy was low with the development of 1 MDS. Updated data on response and overall survival will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures: Roodman: Amgen: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Raptis:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Speakers Bureau. Lentzsch:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; prIME Oncology: Honoraria; Imedex: Honoraria; Clinical Care Options: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document