Phase 1 Study of the Investigational Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib Alone or in Combination with Lenalidomide–Dexamethasone (Rd) in Japanese Patients (Pts) with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5752-5752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Handa ◽  
Kenshi Suzuki ◽  
Takaaki Chou ◽  
Takafumi Matsushima
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Background Ixazomib is the first oral proteasome inhibitor to be investigated clinically for the treatment of MM. Phase 1 studies have shown single-agent activity and manageable toxicities in RRMM (Kumar et al. Blood 2014) and phase 1/2 studies have suggested the feasibility and activity of weekly oral ixazomib plus Rd in previously untreated MM (Kumar et al. ASH 2012; Richardson et al. ASH 2013). These findings have led to ongoing phase 3 trials of weekly ixazomib 4 mg + Rd in RRMM and previously untreated MM. However, the early-phase studies were conducted in Western pts. This phase 1, open-label multicenter study aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of weekly ixazomib alone or with Rd in Japanese pts with RRMM (Japic Clinical Trials Information no. 121822). Methods Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability, including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs), and the PK of ixazomib alone or with Rd. A secondary objective was evaluation of antitumor activity. Japanese pts aged ≥20 years with RRMM who had received at least 2 prior regimens, which must have included bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide, and corticosteroids, were eligible. All had measurable disease and ECOG performance status of 0–2. Pts with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or grade ≥2 diarrhea at study entry were excluded. Pts received ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles, alone or with Rd (lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1–21, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22), per the regimen used in the ongoing phase 3 trials. AEs were graded per NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Blood samples for PK analysis were taken at multiple time points prior to and after dosing on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1. Responses were assessed per IMWG uniform response criteria. Results Fourteen pts were enrolled; 8 (57%) were male, median age was 62.5 yrs (range 53–71), 4 pts were aged ≥65 yrs, median number of prior therapies was 7. Seven pts received single-agent ixazomib and 7 received ixazomib + Rd. One pt in each cohort was excluded from the DLT-evaluable population. Two patients experienced DLTs in cycle 1: 1 pt receiving single-agent ixazomib had grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 diarrhea, hypertension, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and nausea; 1 pt in the ixazomib + Rd cohort had grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. All events were considered treatment-related. At data cut-off (Jan 6 2014), 6 pts remained on treatment and 8 had discontinued due to: progressive disease (PD; n=3), AEs (n=3), symptomatic deterioration, and protocol violation (each n=1). At data cut-off, pts (n=14) had received a median of 6 cycles of ixazomib (range 1–21); the 7 pts in the ixazomib + Rd cohort had received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–12) of ixazomib + Rd. Thirteen (93%) pts experienced treatment-related AEs; the most common were neutropenia (71%), thrombocytopenia (71%), leukopenia (64%), lymphopenia (57%), and diarrhea (50%). There were no cases of peripheral neuropathy. Nine (64%) pts had grade ≥3 AEs; the most common were lymphopenia (50%), neutropenia (43%), and thrombocytopenia (36%). Two (14%) pts (single-agent cohort) had serious AEs (grade 2 bronchitis in 1 pt, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 hypokalemia in 1 pt). Three pts discontinued due to AEs; 1 due to diarrhea in the single-agent cohort, and 1 due to neutropenia and 1 due to thrombocytopenia in the ixazomib + Rd cohort. There were no deaths. PK data showed ixazomib was rapidly absorbed with a Tmax at 1.08–1.83 hrs. Terminal half-life (geometric mean) was 5.7 days for single-agent ixazomib and 5.2 days for ixazomib + Rd. There were no substantial differences in the ixazomib PK profile between the two cohorts. Thirteen pts were response-evaluable. One pt (ixazomib + Rd cohort) had a partial response; at data cut-off, this pt remained in response with a 100% M-protein reduction (unconfirmed VGPR) and duration of response of ~10.8 months. Seven pts had stable disease (including 3 with M-protein reductions of 25–50%), 2 had PD, and 3 were not assessable. Conclusions These data suggest that ixazomib 4 mg alone or with Rd is feasible and tolerable in Japanese pts with RRMM. The AEs were manageable, reflecting the AE profile seen in Western populations, supporting the use of this dose and schedule in Japanese pts. Disclosures Handa: Celgene: Research Funding; Yakult: Research Funding; Kirin: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Investigational agent ixazomib for the treatment of Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.. Matsushima:Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited : Employment.

QT Interval Effects and M-Protein Response in a Phase 1 Study of Siltuximab (Anti-IL-6 Monoclonal Antibody) in Patients with Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance, Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, or Indolent Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2972-2972
Author(s):  
Sheeba K. Thomas ◽  
Alexander Suvorov ◽  
Lucien Noens ◽  
Oleg Rukavitsin ◽  
Joseph Fay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Qt Interval ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 2972 Introduction Siltuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds human interleukin (IL)-6 with high affinity. Formal assessments of siltuximab's effects on cardiac repolarization using triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) have not yet been performed in clinical studies. A phase 1 study was conducted to evaluate the effect of siltuximab, administered at the highest dose level used in clinical studies, on the QT interval in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), or indolent multiple myeloma (IMM, i.e., asymptomatic MM with ≤3 lytic bone lesions but no other end organ damage). Methods Thirty patients with MGUS, SMM, or IMM who met the following criteria on ECG at screening: pulse 45−90 bpm, QTcF and QTcB ≤500 ms, QRS <100 ms, and PR <200 ms received siltuximab 15 mg/kg q3w as a 60 min IV infusion for 4 cycles. Patients were excluded for significant cardiac disease. ECGs and pharmacokinetics assessment were performed at Cycle 1 (pre-infusion [baseline]; end of infusion; and 1, 3, and 24 hrs post-infusion) and at Cycle 4 (pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 1 hr post-infusion). At all timepoints, triplicate 12-lead ECGs were conducted and evaluated by a central cardiology laboratory. No effect on QTc interval was concluded if the upper limit of the least square (LS) mean 90% confidence interval (CI) for the change from baseline QTc at each time point was <20 ms. Safety data were also collected. Preliminary assessment of clinical activity was performed using M-protein measurements from local laboratories. Patients achieving a 50% reduction from baseline in M-protein after 4 cycles were eligible for extended siltuximab therapy (15 mg/kg q4w). Results Thirty patients (14 MGUS, 15 SMM, 1 IMM) with median age 59.5 (range 24, 79) yrs were enrolled. Median serum protein electrophoresis was 1.21 (range 0, 5.4) g/dL, and median urine protein electrophoresis was 0 (range 0, 267) mg/24 hrs. Twenty-eight patients completed all 4 treatment cycles, among whom 27 were evaluable for the primary endpoint of QT interval assessment. The maximum mean increase in QTc from baseline occurred 3 hrs after the Cycle 1 infusion (QTcF = 3.2 ms [LS mean 90% CI −0.01, 6.45]; QTcB = 2.7 ms [LS mean 90% CI −0.69, 6.14]). At all other time points for both QTcF and QTcB, the mean increase from baseline was ≤1.5 ms and the upper limit of LS mean 90% CI was ≤5.07 ms. An effect of siltuximab on QTc interval was therefore ruled out. Furthermore, no patient had a QTcF or QTcB increase from baseline >30 ms, and no correlation was observed between siltuximab serum concentrations and change from baseline in QTcB or QTcF. Twenty (67%) of 30 treated patients had ≥1 adverse events (AEs). AEs reported by ≥10% of patients were nausea, fatigue (20% each); thrombocytopenia, headache (each 13%); dyspnea, leukopenia, neutropenia, paraesthesia, and upper respiratory tract infection (each 10%). The majority of AEs were grade ≤2. However, 8 (27%) patients had ≥1 AE grade ≥3: neutropenia (n=3); hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, hypotension, leukopenia, and myalgia (each n=1); and 1 patient had grade 3 ascites, cellulitis, peripheral edema, portal hypertension, and hepatic cirrhosis (diagnosis made during hospitalization). This patient discontinued treatment due to cellulitis (possibly related to siltuximab) with peripheral edema and ascites (not related to siltuximab). A second patient discontinued treatment due to grade 2 atrial fibrillation that was not related to siltuximab. No severe infusion reactions or deaths were reported. After the first 4 cycles (3 mos), 3 MGUS patients achieved an M-protein response (≥50% reduction from baseline), and 9 patients (3 MGUS, 5 SMM, 1 IMM) had minor responses (≥25% and <50% reduction from baseline). Two patients who qualified for extended treatment with siltuximab continued to receive therapy (17 and 6 cycles, respectively) at the time of database lock. Conclusion Siltuximab, given at the highest dose level used in clinical studies, did not affect the QTc interval. Overall safety was similar to what has been previously reported for other single-agent siltuximab studies. M-protein responses were seen by local laboratory assessment within the first 4 cycles. A randomized phase 2 study is ongoing to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent siltuximab in high-risk SMM. Disclosures: Thomas: Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bandekar:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Puchalski:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Qi:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Uhlar:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Exposure-Response Analyses and Disease Modeling for Selection and Confirmation of Optimal Dosing Regimen of Isatuximab in Combination Treatment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1897-1897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatiha Rachedi ◽  
Kimiko Koiwai ◽  
Nadia Gaudel-Dedieu ◽  
Bernard Sebastien ◽  
Hoai-Thu Thai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Dosing Regimen ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Phase 1 Trials ◽  
Exposure Response ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Time Since Diagnosis

Background: Isatuximab (Isa) is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody with multiple modes of action for killing tumor cells through direct tumor targeting and immune cell engagement. Exposure-Response (E-R) analysis and disease modelling of tumor burden were performed to evaluate the relationship between Isa exposure and efficacy outcomes. This analysis also supports the Isatuximab dosing regimen selection/confirmation when administered in combination in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. Methods: To determine the optimal dose for the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM study, E-R analyses were conducted in 44 and 52 RRMM evaluable patients from two Phase 1 trials of Isa in combination with pomalidomide/dexamethasone (Pd) (NCT02283775) or with lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) (NCT01749969), respectively. Isa was administered intravenously at doses from 3 to 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks or weekly for 4 weeks then every 2 weeks (QW/Q2W). In the E-R analyses, several Isa exposure parameters were tested to evaluate if they were predictors of response (partial response [PR] or better). Baseline covariates were also considered in the model to evaluate potential confounding effects. In addition, a second type of analysis was performed on 2 pooled datasets of 153 (single agent and combination with Pd) and 162 (single agent and combination with Rd) evaluable RRMM patients: disease response was also captured by modeling the dynamics of the serum M-protein using a joint model of tumor growth inhibition and drop-out. Trial simulations were then performed to evaluate different dosing regimens of interest. To confirm the dose, E-R analyses were conducted in 297 evaluable RRMM patients from the phase 3 trial (ICARIA-MM; NCT02990338) comparing Isa-Pd (N=148) and Pd (N=149). Isa was administered intravenously at 10 mg/kg QW/Q2W in the Isa-Pd arm. Cox and Weibull (Progression-Free Survival [PFS]) or logistic regression (overall response rate [ORR]) models were used. Results: In the two combination Phase 1 trials, Isa appeared to be well tolerated with no clear dose response relationship between 10 and 20 mg/kg. E-R analyses suggested that higher Isa exposure represented by log Ctrough at 4 weeks (CT4W) was associated with increased ORR. Both models predicted an increased ORR with decreased beta-2 microglobulin and lower number of prior lines of therapy (Rd only), together with higher log CT4W. Clinical trial simulations showed that the probability of success to reach the targeted ORR was high with 10 mg/kg QW/Q2W for both Pd (83% for ORR ≥60%) and Rd (96% for ORR ≥50%). Serum M-protein reduction was greater at doses ≥10 mg/kg compared to doses <10 mg/kg, with minimal differences between 10 and 20 mg/kg QW/Q2W. These analyses supported the rationale for 10 mg/kg QW/Q2W selection for the Phase 3 combination study. In the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM study, the E-R analysis showed that higher CT4W was associated with higher ORR (predicted ORR below and above the median CT4W being 52% and 72%, respectively). The final model also included time since diagnosis and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage at baseline and an interaction between time since diagnosis and R-ISS; ORR increased as time since diagnosis increased and decreased with higher R-ISS stage. For PFS, in addition to CT4W, the model included plasmacytomas, serum albumin level and R-ISS at baseline. The predicted distribution of PFS indicated that patients with greater Isa CT4W had longer PFS, patients with R-ISS Stage III and plasmacytomas had shorter PFS. Matched analyses to Pd indicated that even patients with concentrations ≤median CT4W benefited from Isa treatment (PFS hazard ratio: 0.773). Conclusion: Model-based drug development was successfully applied to support Phase 3 Isa dosing regimen selection for use in combination with Pd in RRMM patients. E-R and clinical data from the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM study confirmed the efficacy and safety of 10 mg/kg QW/Q2W dose/regimen selected. Disclosures Rachedi: Sanofi: Employment. Koiwai:Sanofi: Employment. Gaudel-Dedieu:Sanofi: Employment. Sebastien:Sanofi: Employment. Thai:Sanofi: Employment. El-Cheikh:Sanofi: Employment. Brillac:Sanofi: Employment. Fau:Sanofi: Employment. Nguyen:Sanofi: Employment. Liu:Sanofi: Employment. Campana:Sanofi: Employment. van de Velde:Sanofi: Employment. Semiond:Sanofi: Employment.

A Phase 2 Study of Prolonged Carfilzomib Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Previously Enrolled in Carfilzomib Clinical Trials.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2962-2962 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
Thomas G Martin ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Response Data ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2962 Background: Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a next-generation selective proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. PX-171-010 (NCT00884312) is a phase 2 extension study for patients who had previously received CFZ treatment in any phase 1 or 2 study, typically for 12–18 months. Herein we report updated safety and efficacy results for patients enrolled in this ongoing study. Methods: The primary endpoint was safety, and patients were also followed for efficacy. All serious adverse events (SAEs), peripheral neuropathy (PN) AEs, and AEs ≥Grade 3 were to be reported, as were any AEs resulting in dose modifications. Patients were evaluated for response every 2 cycles, although more frequent assessments were permitted per local standards of care. Investigator-assessed responses are reported here. Regimen changes consisted of the following: i) changes in CFZ dosing (increases to achieve or maintain disease control or decreases for toxicity); ii) the addition of other approved anti-MM agents at the time of confirmed or suspected progression; and iii) a combination of i) and ii). CFZ dosing could range from 11 mg/m2 to 56 mg/m2with a dose frequency of Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of a 28-day cycle or alternatively Days 1, 2, 15, and 16. Results: A total of 98 patients were enrolled, including 9 patients with solid tumors and 89 patients with MM. At the time of 010 enrollment, the median time since diagnosis for MM patients was 4 years (range, 1–24), and 46.1% had received prior bortezomib therapy. Overall in the safety population (N=98), patients during the 010 study started a median of 10.5 cycles (range, 1–33) of CFZ. When considering treatment during a prior CFZ study as well, total exposure to CFZ was a median of 22 cycles or 89 weeks. The CFZ regimen was changed in 60% of patients during 010; reasons included confirmed or suspected PD (43.9%), AEs (9.2%), and/or other reasons (eg, patient preference, investigator discretion; 20.2%). The median number of regimen changes was 1 (range, 0–7). The CFZ dose was increased in 25.5% of patients, and in 42%, CFZ was used in combination with other anti-MM agents, including dexamethasone (34.7%), lenalidomide (22.4%), and cyclophosphamide (17.3%). Overall, AEs were reported in 82.7% of patients, the most common being upper respiratory tract infection (17.3%), fatigue (17.3%), and anemia (16.3%). Of note, 6.1% reported PN with just 1 patient experiencing a Grade 3 event. SAEs were reported in 50% of patients, most commonly pneumonia (8.2%), influenza (6.1%), dyspnea (6.1%), pyrexia (5.1%), and acute renal failure (5.1%). Discontinuation due to an AE occurred in 11.2%, the most common reason being myocardial infarction (2%). There have been 5 deaths on study with 3 due to AEs (1 related to CFZ), events being myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and 1 pt with both myocardial infarction and pneumonia as cause of death, and 2 due to PD (1 with associated Grade 5 hypercalcemia). The table summarizes response data by CFZ regimen for patients with MM during 010 through the third regimen (at the time of abstract submission, limited response data were available for patients who received ≥4 regimens). Conclusions: Extended treatment with CFZ as single agent or in combination with other anti-MM therapy was well tolerated with a safety profile that was consistent with previous CFZ studies. Notably, there was no evidence of unique or late-onset cumulative toxicity. When compared to previous phase 1 and 2 CFZ trials, PN incidence continued to be low and was generally mild to moderate in severity. Similarly, and importantly, patients continued to obtain clinically meaningful responses with multiple regimen and dose changes. Taken together, the safety profile, long-term tolerability, and responses associated with extended treatment with CFZ are promising. Disclosures: Siegel: Millennium: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Boards Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a next-generation selective proteasome inhibitor that was recently approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Wang:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Martin:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. Kaufman:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy. Ranjangam:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Huang:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Bilotti:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Onyx Therapeutics: Consultancy. Vij:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Aspacytarabine (BST-236) Is Safe and Efficacious As a Single-Agent, First-Line Therapy for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Unfit for Standard Chemotherapy. Integrated Results from a Phase 1/2a and an Ongoing Phase 2b

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 179-179
Author(s):  
Jessica K. Altman ◽  
Tsila Zuckerman ◽  
Olga Frankfurt ◽  
Selina M. Luger ◽  
Dale L. Bixby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Prior Exposure ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Introduction: Aspacytarabine (BST-236) is a prodrug of cytarabine, a backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy. Due to its unique pharmacokinetics and metabolism, treatment with aspacytarabine evades peak exposure to free cytarabine, which reduces non-hematological toxicity and enables delivery of high-dose cytarabine also to patients unfit for standard therapy. Data from a completed phase 1/2a and an ongoing phase 2b studies in AML patients unfit for standard therapy, including patients with AML secondary to therapy and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with prior exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMA), demonstrate promising single-agent efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a potential first-line AML treatment for this challenging population. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine in AML patients unfit for standard induction therapy. Methods: A completed phase 1/2a study and an ongoing phase 2b study evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a single-agent therapeutic for AML. The phase 1/2a, dose-escalation study enrolled newly-diagnosed patients unfit for standard therapy and patients with relapsed/refractory AML. Patients were treated with 0.3-6 g/m2/d aspacytarabine in 6 dose-escalating cohorts. The ongoing multi-center phase 2b study expands the subgroup of newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard therapy, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a first-line therapy for this population. Secondary AML patients, treated with HMA, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy for a prior condition, are allowed. Patients in the phase 2b study are treated with the selected aspacytarabine dose of 4.5 g/m2/d, containing approximately 3 g/m2/d of cytarabine. Each aspacytarabine treatment course (induction and consolidation) consists of 6 1-hour daily intravenous infusions. Results: To date, 34 AML patients, median age 76 years, received at least 1 dose of aspacytarabine, including 30 patients unfit for standard induction therapy due to age or comorbidities. Overall, 25 patients completed 1 course of aspacytarabine, 4 patients completed 2 courses, 1 patient completed 3 courses, and 1 patient completed 4 courses of aspacytarabine. Three patients (in the phase 1/2a study) did not complete the first course. Aspacytarabine was safe and well-tolerated in repeated-course administration, including in older and unfit patients. Adverse events included mainly hematological "on-target" events with no drug-related mucositis or cerebellar toxicity. Twenty-one patients were newly-diagnosed with AML, either de novo or secondary to MDS or therapy. The patient population was characterized by older age (median 76 years, range 67-88 years), and the majority (67%) of patients had secondary AML, including 10 patients (48%) who were previously treated with HMA (median of 10 courses) or radiotherapy. The median baseline bone marrow blast percentage of this population was 75, and 43% and 48% had intermediate or adverse European LeukemiaNet (ELN) cytogenetic score, respectively. Despite these poor-prognostic characteristics, the 30-day mortality rate in the group of patients receiving ≥4.5 g/m2/d aspacytarabine was 7%. The combined complete remission (CR) rate of all doses was 33%, including 1 patient reaching a CR with partial platelet recovery (CRp). The CR rate in patients treated with at least 4.5 g/m2/d aspacytarabine is 36%, with median time for complete hematological recovery of 27 days (range 21-30) following induction and consolidation. Notably, among the 7 patients who reached a CR/CRp (median age 77), 3 secondary AML patients reached a CR, including 2 patients with prior exposure to HMA (5 and 10 courses) and 1 with prior exposure to radiotherapy (Table 1). Duration of response and overall survival follow up is ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The accumulating clinical data suggest that aspacytarabine is safe and efficacious for the treatment of AML patients who are unfit for standard induction therapy, including patients with prior exposure to HMA, which may establish aspacytarabine as a new therapeutic backbone for AML, either as a single agent or in combination with targeted therapy. Disclosures Altman: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biosight: Other: US Lead; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer Expert Now: Consultancy; France Foundation: Speakers Bureau; prIME Oncology: Speakers Bureau; PeerView: Speakers Bureau; Theradex: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Luger:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Onconova: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Genetech: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Cyslacel: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria. Kota:Takeda: Honoraria; Xcenda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Flaishon:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Tessler:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Gengrinovitch:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Ben Yakar:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Rowe:BioSight: Consultancy.

scholarly journals A Phase 1/2 Trial of Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4774-4774
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Laura V. Stampleman ◽  
Alberto Bessudo ◽  
Peter J. Rosen ◽  
Leonard M Klein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), such as thalidomide and lenalidomide (LEN) and its newest derivative pomalidomide (POM), have shown great promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). POM has in vitro anti-MM potency and has shown efficacy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM pts. POM with dexamethasone (DEX) induces responses even for MM pts who are refractory to bortezomib (BORT) and LEN (Richardson et al, 2012). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with BORT is FDA-approved for the treatment of MM pts who have received one prior therapy not containing BORT. The combination of PLD and LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for both RR and frontline MM pts (Offidani et al, 2006; 2007). We have also demonstrated that both the efficacy and tolerability of LEN in combination with DEX, PLD and BORT (DVD-R) may be improved by changing the doses and schedules of these drugs (Berenson et al, 2012). Based on these results, we hypothesized that the combination of POM, DEX and PLD would be effective for the treatment of RRMM pts. Thus, we conducted the first study investigating the safety and efficacy of POM in combination with intravenous (IV) DEX and PLD as a phase 1/2 trial using a modified dose, schedule and longer 28-day cycles for pts with RRMM. Methods The phase 1 portion enrolled MM pts w/ progressive disease whereas those enrolled in phase 2 also had to be refractory to LEN (single-agent or in combination), as demonstrated by progressive disease while receiving their last LEN-containing regimen or relapsed within 8 weeks of their last dose of this IMiD. Pts who have previously received POM treatment were ineligible. In the phase 1 portion, POM was administered at 2, 3 or 4 mg daily in three cohorts on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle and DEX (40 mg) and PLD (5 mg/m2) were fixed and given intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Results As of June 20th, 2014, 48 pts were enrolled in the trial and a total of 47 pts had received study drug. Pts had received a median of 4 prior treatments (range 1-18), with a median of 2 prior IMiD-containing regimens (range, 0-8). Fifty-three percent of the pts had received a prior PLD-containing regimen and 21% had received a prior IMiD and PLD combination treatment. Among all enrolled pts, 40 pts discontinued treatment and seven remain active. Pts completed a median of 3 cycles (range: 1-8), with a median follow-up time of 5.4 months (range: 0-22). During the phase 1 portion of the trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of POM was established at 4 mg. Enrollment of pts into the phase 2 portion of the trial began at the MTD. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed at this dose in 10/17 (58.8%) phase 2 pts; and, as a result, the protocol was amended so that the MTD was lowered to 3 mg for all pts subsequently enrolled. Among the 36 pts enrolled in phase 2, 78% percent were refractory to LEN and steroids with or without other agents and 47% had previously received PLD. A median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 8) were administered among the pts enrolled in phase 2. Thirty-five pts were evaluable for response as one pt was active but had not yet had any post-baseline disease assessments. Among all pts enrolled in phase 2, the overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 29% and 49%, respectively, with 6 pts (17%) showing stable disease and 12 pts (34%) demonstrating progressive disease. For all pts enrolled in phase 2, the median follow-up time was 4.7 months (range 0-12) and the median PFS was 5.3 months. ORR and CBR for pts in the phase 2 were higher among pts receiving POM at 3 mg (32% and 58%, respectively) than among pts receiving POM at 4 mg (25% and 37%, respectively). Pts receiving the 4 mg dose of POM experienced more toxicities resulting in discontinuations, which likely explains the lower ORR and CBR observed among pts receiving this POM dose. Common ≥ grade 3 adverse events observed throughout the trial were neutropenia (21 pts; 44.7%), lymphopenia (10 pts; 21.3%), and hyponatremia (4 pts; 8.5%). One pt died of grade 5 sepsis. Conclusions This phase 1/2 trial is the first evaluating POM with PLD and DEX and demonstrates that the combination of POM at 3 mg, PLD and DEX using a modified 28-day cycle schedule is safe and effective for the treatment of MM pts refractory to LEN. Disclosures Berenson: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Swift:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Vescio:Celgene: Honoraria.

Pralatrexate Is Active in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL): Results of a Multicenter, Dose-Finding Trial.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 919-919
Author(s):  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
Madeleine Duvic ◽  
Youn Kim ◽  
Jasmine M Zain ◽  
Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 919 Background: Pralatrexate enters cancer cells via the reduced folate carrier-1 (RFC-1) and is efficiently polyglutamated by folylpolyglutamyl synthetase (FPGS), leading to high intracellular retention. In a Phase 1/2 study of patients with hematologic malignancies, pralatrexate demonstrated activity in aggressive T-cell lymphoma with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 30 mg/m2 once weekly for 6 of 7 weeks. The generally indolent course of CTCL may be better treated at lower doses in a maintenance fashion if a lower incidence and severity of adverse events can be achieved while preserving activity. PDX-010 is an open-label, single-agent, multicenter, Phase 1 dose-reduction trial in patients with relapsed or refractory CTCL. The primary objective is to identify an optimal dose and schedule of pralatrexate for these patients. Methods: Eligibility included mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL); with disease progression after at least 1 prior systemic therapy. The pralatrexate dose and schedule started at 30 mg/m2 by IV push on 3 of 4 weeks and subsequent cohorts received reduced doses (20, 15, 10 mg/m2) and/or schedules (3/4 or 2/3 weeks) of pralatrexate based on tolerability. All patients received supplementation with vitamin B12 1 mg intramuscularly every 8-10 weeks and folic acid 1 mg orally once daily. As we sought a well tolerated regimen the definition of DLTs to trigger dose reduction included toxicities such as grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 mucositis/stomatitis, and any toxicity leading to dose omission or reduction in cycle 1. If DLT occurred and a response was seen, the following cohort was opened at the next lower dose or next less frequent schedule. Response was evaluated by modified severity-weighted adjustment tool (SWAT) every 2 cycles for 6 months and then every 4 cycles. For patients with lymph node involvement, scans were completed at baseline and upon clinical response or end of treatment, whichever occurred first. Results: Thirty-one patients received pralatrexate, with 18 (58%) men and median age of 57 yrs (range, 30-81). Patients had received a median of 6 prior therapies (range, 1-25). Cohorts at the following doses/schedules were enrolled: 30 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=2), 20 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=3), 20 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=7), 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=6), 15 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=3), and 10 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=10). Patients received pralatrexate for a median of 72 days (range, 7-491+); 4 patients received >10 cycles of treatment. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were mucositis (18 patients [58%]), nausea (14 patients [45%]), fatigue (14 patients [45%]), pyrexia (7 patients [23%]), vomiting (6 patients [19%]), anemia (6 patients [19%]), and edema (5 patients [16%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities in >1 patient each were mucositis (4 patients [13%]) and anemia (2 patients [6%]). Mucositis was dose limiting (≥ grade 2) in 8 patients (26%). A total of 11 responses were observed, including 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses. In the 18 patients who received pralatrexate at a dose intensity of 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks or greater, the objective response rate was 56% (10/18 patients). This appeared to be the threshold dose for substantial activity in CTCL, below which the incidence of responses decreased in this dose de-escalation trial. Conclusion: Pralatrexate shows impressive activity in the treatment of relapsed CTCL. The optimal dose and schedule that provided activity with tolerability for CTCL was determined to be pralatrexate 15 mg/m2 weekly on 3 of 4 weeks. This cohort is being expanded to better assess efficacy and durability. Disclosures: Horwitz: Allos Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Duvic:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lechowicz:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Fruchtman:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment.

A Phase I/II Trial of the KSP Inhibitor ARRY-520 In Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1959-1959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J Shah ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Adam Cohen ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Sheeba Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ksp Inhibitor

Abstract Abstract 1959 Background: Kinesin Spindle Protein (KSP) is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Inhibition of KSP induces mitotic arrest and cell death. ARRY-520 is a potent, selective KSP inhibitor. Cancers such as multiple myeloma (MM) which depend on the short-lived survival protein MCL-1 are highly sensitive to treatment with ARRY-520. ARRY-520 shows potent activity in preclinical MM models, providing a strong rationale for its clinical investigation in this disease. Methods: This Phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ARRY-520 administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1 and Day 2 q 2 weeks without/with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM with 2 prior lines of therapy (including both bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent, unless ineligible for or refusing to receive this therapy) were eligible. Cohorts of at least 3 pts were enrolled in a classical 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Pts were treated for 2 cycles (4 weeks) to evaluate safety prior to dose escalation. Results: Twenty five pts have been treated to date, with a median age of 60 years (range 44–79) and a median of 5 prior regimens (range 2–16). All pts received prior bortezomib or carfilzomib, 21 pts received prior lenalidomide, 17 pts prior thalidomide, and 18 pts had a prior stem cell transplant. Pts received ARRY-520 without G-CSF at 1 mg/m2/day (n = 3), and at 1.25 mg/m2/day (n = 7, 6 evaluable). A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of Grade 4 neutropenia was observed at 1.25 mg/m2/day, and this was considered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) without G-CSF. As neutropenia was the DLT, dose escalation with prophylactic G-CSF support was initiated, at doses of 1.5 mg/m2/day (n = 7, 6 evaluable), 2.0 mg/m2/day (n = 6) and 2.25 mg/m2/day (n = 2) with G-CSF. Both the 2.0 mg/m2/day and 2.25 mg/m2/day dose levels were determined to be non-tolerated, with DLTs of febrile neutropenia (FN) (2 pts at 2.0 mg/m2/day and both pts at 2.25 mg/m2/day) and Grade 3 mucositis (both pts at 2.25 mg/m2/day). One out of 6 evaluable pts at 1.5 mg/m2/day also developed a DLT of FN. In an attempt to optimize the Phase 2 dose, an intermediate dose level of 1.75 mg/m2/day with G-CSF is currently being evaluated. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) include those observed with other KSP inhibitors, such as hematological AEs (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, leukopenia), fatigue, mucositis and other gastro-intestinal AEs. Pts displayed linear PK, a low clearance and a moderate volume of distribution, with moderate-to-high inter-individual variability in PK parameters. The median terminal elimination half life is 65 hours. The preliminary efficacy signal as a single agent is encouraging with 2 partial responses (PR) observed to date per IMWG and EBMT criteria in a heavily pretreated population (23 evaluable pts). A bortezomib-refractory pt with 8 prior lines of therapy, including a tandem transplant, treated at 1 mg/m2/day of ARRY-520 obtained a PR after Cycle 6, with urine protein and kappa light chain levels continuing to decline over time. He remains on-study after 15 months of ARRY-520 treatment. A pt with 2 prior lines of therapy, including prior carfilzomib, has obtained a PR after Cycle 8 at 2 mg/m2/day of ARRY-520, and she is currently ongoing after 4.5 months on therapy. Fifteen pts had a best response of stable disease (SD), including 1 pt with a thus far unconfirmed minimal response, and 6 had progressive disease. A total of 10 pts (43%) achieved a PR or SD lasting > 12 weeks. Several additional pts have shown other evidence of clinical activity, with decrease in paraproteins, increase in hemoglobin levels and regression of plasmacytomas. The median number of cycles is 4 (range 1–28+). Treatment activity has not correlated with any baseline characteristics or disease parameters to date. Conclusions: : The selective KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 has been well tolerated, and shows promising signs of single agent clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts with RR MM. Prophylactic G-CSF has enabled higher doses to be tolerated. No cardiovascular or liver enzyme toxicity has been reported. Enrollment is ongoing at 1.75 mg/m2/day with G-CSF support, and a planned Phase 2 part of the study will be initiated as soon as the MTD is determined. Complete Phase 1 data will be disclosed at the time of the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Revlimid (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone is indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Zonder:Millennium: Consultancy, Myeloma and Amyloidosis Patient Day Symposium – Corporate support from multiple sponsors for a one-day educational event, Research Funding; Celgene:; Novartis:; Proteolix: . Weber:novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Wang:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy. Walker:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Freeman:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rush:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ptaszynski:Array Biopharma: Consultancy. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Onyx: Advisory Board, Consultancy; Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

ARRY-520 Shows Durable Responses in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in a Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1860-1860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J Shah ◽  
Jeffrey Zonder ◽  
Adam Cohen ◽  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Raymond Alexanian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Acceptable Safety Profile ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1860 Background: ARRY-520 is a potent, selective inhibitor of kinesin spindle protein (KSP, eg5) which is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Treatment with ARRY-520 arrests cells in mitosis with subsequent induction of apoptosis due to degradation of survival signals during mitotic arrest. Cancers, such as multiple myeloma (MM), that depend on the short-lived survival protein Myeloid cell leukemia (MCL)-1 are highly sensitive to treatment with ARRY-520 in preclinical MM models, providing a strong rationale for its clinical investigation in this disease. Methods: This Phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary efficacy and biological activity of ARRY-520 administered intravenously on Days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks without/with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Eligible patients (pts) had relapsed or refractory MM with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy (including both bortezomib [BTZ] and an immunomodulatory [IMiD] agent), unless refusing or ineligible for this therapy. Cohorts were enrolled in a classical 3+3 dose escalation design. Results: Enrollment in this Phase 1 study is complete. Thirty-one pts have been treated, with a median age of 60 years (range 43–79) and a median of 6 prior regimens (range 2–16). All pts received a prior proteasome inhibitor (30 pts BTZ, 4 pts carfilzomib) and an IMiD-based agent (28 pts lenalidomide, 23 pts thalidomide). Twenty-four pts had an autologous stem cell transplant. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 1.25 mg/m2/day without G-CSF. As neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), dose escalation with G-CSF support was conducted and the MTD for ARRY-520 with G-CSF was determined to be 1.5 mg/m2/day. At the MTD, 1 of 7 pts had a DLT of febrile neutropenia. At doses above the MTD, additional DLTs of Grade 3 mucositis and Grade 3 corneal disorder were observed. ARRY-520 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included hematologic events (anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia), as well as anorexia, blurred vision, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, febrile neutropenia, mucositis, nausea and rash. No treatment-related AEs of neuropathy or alopecia were reported at the MTD. ARRY-520 has been dosed over extended periods of time (to date, median 7 cycles [range 1–44]), with no evidence of cumulative toxicity. The plasma concentrations of ARRY-520 were determined over a 7-day period during Cycle 1 following the Day 1 and 2 infusions of ARRY-520. The preliminary noncompartmental PK parameter estimates in this population were similar to those observed in prior oncology studies. The PK was characterized by low clearance (CL = 2.2 L/hr/m2) and a large volume of distribution (Vss = 232 L/m2). The t1/2 of elimination was very long (67 hrs). Concentrations were typically maintained above the in vitro IC50 for KSP inhibition for ≥ 7 days suggesting therapeutically active concentrations of drug were maintained in pts for sustained periods. Further analyses of PK relative to safety and activity are on-going. ARRY-520 showed activity as a single agent across a range of doses in this heavily pretreated population (31 evaluable pts) with 3 confirmed partial responses (PR) and 1 confirmed minimal response (MR) per International Melanoma Working Group (IMWG) and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EMBT) criteria. PRs had a median of 7 prior therapies (range 2–8). Responses were durable; to date, the durations of responses for PRs were 3.4+ months (mos), 11.9+ mos and 12.0 mos, respectively. Of interest, the time to response with ARRY-520 was prolonged, with a median time to PR of 3.7 mos (range 3.7–8.1). Notably, responses were observed in pts refractory to multiple standard-of-care agents. In addition, 4 pts experienced a best response of stable disease (SD) lasting ≥ 10 mos. To date, 5 pts remain on study, including 2 of 3 PRs. Conclusions: In this Phase 1 study, ARRY-520 shows promising evidence of clinical activity, with a long duration of response and an acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated MM Patients. A Phase 2 portion of the study is ongoing to obtain additional information on the efficacy, safety and biological effects of ARRY-520 at 1.5 mg/m2/day with G-CSF support. Disclosures: Shah: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: ARRY-520. Zonder:Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Medtronics: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy. Cohen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Orlowski:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alexanian:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Thomas:Array BioPharma: Research Funding; Centecor: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Weber:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Kaufman:Keryx: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Walker:Array BioPharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Litwiler:Array BioPharma: Employment. Karan:Array BioPharma: Employment. Hilder:a: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma Inc.: Consultancy. Lonial:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

Lenalidomide (Revlimid), Bortezomib (Velcade) and Dexamethasone (RVD) for Heavily Pretreated Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2936-2936
Author(s):  
Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
Vishal Kukreti
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Prior Exposure ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2936 Almost all patients (pts) with multiple myeloma eventually relapse and remission duration decreases with each regimen. The median Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) in pts with relapsed myeloma refractory to lenalidomide (len) and bortezomib (btz) is poor at 5 and 9 months respectively. A phase 1 study of len plus btz in pts with relapsed or relapsed, refractory MM (RRMM) demonstrated favorable toxicity and promising response and survival further confirmed in a phase 2 study with len, btz and dexamethasone (dex) [RVD]. In this retrospective study, we assessed the efficacy and toxicity profile of RVD therapy for pts with advanced RRMM. We retrospectively reviewed the records of all pts with RRMM treated with RVD at Princess Margaret Hospital between 03/09 and 05/11. Relapse was defined according to the Uniform International Criteria. Pts were given RVD therapy as previous described by Anderson et al and must have completed at least one cycle of RVD therapy. Primary endpoints were response rate (RR), PFS, OS, and toxicity. Pts discontinued therapy if they experienced PD, no additional benefit or unacceptable toxicity. Definitions of response and progression were used according to the EBMT modified criteria with a category of very good partial response (VGPR). To examine variables independently prognostic for PFS and OS, multivariate Cox analysis was performed. Differences in continuous variables between groups were compared using Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Survival curves were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Thirty pts with RRMM received RVD therapy. Clinical characteristics are seen in Table 1. Median age at RVD initiation was 57 yrs (37–76 yrs), and 46.7% were male. Pts received a median of 3 prior therapies (1–6). In many instances, pts previously treated with len had len added to btz + dex at progression (n=6), or pts previously treated with btz had btz added to len + dex, at progression (n=5). Thalidomide (thal), len and btz containing regimens were previously used in 60%, 73.3% and 80% of pts respectively. PR or better was observed in 46.6%. After a median of 4.6 cycles (1–14), VGPR was seen in 4.8%, PR in 33% and SD in 14%. Pts who achieved PR or better experienced a significant improvement in PFS. There was no difference in terms of RR between those pts according to prior exposure to either btz or len (p=0.7 and 0.9 respectively). Eight pts experienced non-hematological grade 3/4 adverse events (26%), including muscle weakness, sepsis and pneumonia but there was no worsening of peripheral neuropathy. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia were commonly seen in 70% of pts (n=21). Disease progression was seen in 19 pts at a median of 3.9 months. Median PFS for pts previously exposed to len was 2.3 months vs 2.9 months for those with no prior exposure (p=0.75). On the other hand, median PFS for pts previously exposed to btz was 2.1 months vs 3.4 months for those with no prior exposure (p=0.9) In addition, median PFS for pts who achieved at least PR was significantly better at 5.9 vs 2.0 months for those who did not (p<0.005). (Figure 1) FISH cytogenetics studies were available in 19 out of 30 patients at relapse: 5 -normal, 4–13q deletion, 3-p53 deletion and 2 - t(4, 14). High-risk MM pts had a median PFS significantly lower of 0.6 months (CI 95%, 0–1.99) vs 4.7 months for those without high-risk features (CI 2.5–7.0) (p=0.008) (Figure 2) At the time of submission, 13 pts are alive (43.3%) and 7 pts (23%) continue on RVD therapy.Table 1.Clinical characteristics of patients with RRMM treated with RVDClinical characteristic N=30MedianRange%Age5737-76Male46.7%Female53.3%Hemoglobin (g/L)10571-155Creatinine (mmol/L)99.936-383Beta-2 microglobulin (mmol/L)280119-1440Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)18189-255IgG56.6% (17)IgA23.3% (7)IgM3.3% (1)Light Chain16.6% (5)Kappa (mg/L)4005.3-346063.3% (19)Lambda (mg/L)5145.1-530036.7% (11)KappaLambda*BMPC57%6-95%M-spike serum (g/L)300-77M-spike urine (g/d)0.890-7.9Prior therapies31-6ASCT83.3% (25)Thal60% (18)Len73.3% (22)Btz80% (24)*BMPC, Bone marrow plasma cells In conclusion, RVD is active and well tolerated in pts with RRMM, including pts who have received prior len, btz, thal and ASCT but PFS is short at 3.9 months in this highly advanced disease group of patients. We question whether response is dependent on recognized risk factors such as adverse cytogenetics. Disclosures: Jimenez-Zepeda: J & J: Honoraria. Reece:Bristol, Meyers, Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson&Johnson: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

MLN9708, a Novel, Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Light-Chain Amyloidosis (AL): Results of a Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 731-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giampaolo Merlini ◽  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Vishal Kukreti ◽  
Stefan O Schonland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cardiac Biomarker ◽  
Hematologic Response ◽  
Major Organ ◽  
Organ Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 731 Background: Treatment with bortezomib achieves high hematologic response rates and rapid and durable responses in AL patients (pts), providing the rationale for proteasome inhibition in this population. MLN9708 is an investigational, oral, potent, reversible, and specific 20S proteasome inhibitor (PI). In preclinical studies, MLN9708 has shown improved antitumor activity compared to bortezomib in a range of xenograft models. This phase 1 study (NCT01318902) assessed weekly doses of oral MLN9708 in pts with relapsed or refractory AL. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 years with relapsed or refractory AL after ≥1 prior therapy, cardiac biomarker stage I/II disease, and measurable major organ (heart/kidney) involvement, received increasing doses of oral MLN9708 (standard 3+3 dose escalation fixed doses of 4.0 and 5.5 mg), on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles for up to 12 cycles. Pts with no major hematologic response (<PR) after 3 cycles received dexamethasone (dex; 40 mg, days 1–4). Two expansion cohorts of PI-naïve and PI-exposed pts were enrolled at the MTD. The primary objectives were to determine the safety, tolerability, and MTD. Secondary objectives included analysis of plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) and whole blood pharmacodynamic effects of MLN9708, and assessment of overall hematologic response rate, time to and duration of hematologic and organ response. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 4.03. Blood samples were collected at multiple timepoints pre- and post-MLN9708 dosing for PK analysis during cycle 1. Hematologic response and amyloid-related organ assessments were performed according to standardized criteria. Results: At data cut-off (June 29, 2012) 16 pts had been enrolled and received ≥1 MLN9708 dose (safety population). The median age was 66.5 years (range 54–78) and 7 were male. Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1–7); 10 received prior transplant, 7 received prior bortezomib. Major organ involvement, defined by standard criteria, included heart, kidney, or both in 7/5/4 pts, respectively, with a median of 2 (range 1–5) involved organ systems, and Mayo cardiac biomarker risk stage was I, II, III in 6, 9, 1 pts. Five pts were treated in the 5.5 mg cohort and 11 pts were treated in the 4.0 mg (n=6 dose escalation; n=5 dose expansion) cohorts. Of the 11 pts treated at 4.0 mg, 4 were PI-naïve, 7 were PI-exposed. Pts received a median of 3 cycles (range 1–12); 5 pts received ≥5 cycles, and 8 pts remain on treatment. Dex was added in 4 pts (2 in each MLN9708 dose level). There were no on-study deaths. Pts discontinued due to disease progression (n=5), AE, withdrawal by pt, or unsatisfactory response (each n=1); 2 pts completed planned 1 year of therapy. One pt in the 4.0 mg cohort experienced a DLT of grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Two pts in the 5.5 mg dose cohort experienced DLTs: grade 3 diarrhea in 1 pt, and renal failure, respiratory failure (both grade 2), and cardiac arrest (grade 4) in another pt. The MTD was determined as 4.0 mg. AEs were reported in 14 pts. The most common drug-related AEs included nausea (n=5), diarrhea and thrombocytopenia (each n=4), abdominal pain and fatigue (each n=3). Grade ≥3 AEs (any cause) reported in >1 pt were thrombocytopenia (n=4), dyspnea (n=3), maculo-papular rash, dehydration, and abdominal pain (each n=2); all were grade 3. Preliminary response data are shown in the table. At data cut-off, one responder had progressed, and the median duration of hematologic response was 7.4 months (range 1.3–11.5+); 2 pts had cardiac organ response. Preliminary PK data showed that MLN9708 was rapidly absorbed, with a median Tmax of 1 hr (range 0.5–6). MLN9708 day 15 plasma Cmax was 73.6 ± 40.2 ng/mL (mean ± SD) and AUC0–168was 1250 ±530 ng*hr/mL (n=8 at 4.0 mg dose cohort). MLN9708 PK parameter values in this study appear similar to other MLN9708 studies in myeloma pts. Conclusions: These data suggest weekly oral administration of MLN9708 is feasible in pts with relapsed or refractory AL. The MLN9708 MTD was determined as 4.0 mg. Assessment is ongoing, with preliminary evidence of hematologic responses noted. A phase 3 study of MLN9708 plus dex versus physician's choice of treatment is planned (NCT01659658). Disclosures: Merlini: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Use of the investigational agent MLN9708, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in the treatment of relapsed or refractory light-chain amyloidosis. Sanchorawala:Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding. Zonder:Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kukreti:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Schonland:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Dispenzieri:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Cohen:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berg:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Liu:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Di Bacco:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Gupta:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hui:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Comenzo:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document