Monitoring of Wilms' Tumor Gene 1 Levels Predict Early Relapse After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation in Patients with High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4102-4102
Author(s):  
Elisa Sala ◽  
Carlo Messina ◽  
Cristina Tresoldi ◽  
Matteo Carrabba ◽  
Michela Tassara ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4102 Background: several approaches have been used in AML and MDS patients (pts) in Complete Remission (CR) to detect Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) and predict the risk of relapse. The Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1) is over-expressed in > 80% of AML and advanced MDS, making this molecule an ideal marker for MRD monitoring. We analyzed WT1 quantitative expression in pts at high risk of relapse who received an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT) at our Institute. Aim of the study: to analyze WT1 based MRD monitoring as a predictive marker of relapse in AML/MDS pts after allo-HSCT. Materials and methods: in this retrospective study we included 54 pts with high-risk disease (50 AML and 4 MDS) who underwent allo-HSCT (10 MRD, 13 MUD, 28 MMRD, 3 CB), mostly after a myeloablative treosulfan-based (51/54 pts) conditioning between November 2007 and January 2011. In all pts (54/54) WT1 was over-expressed in the presence of active disease. Post-transplant disease evaluations, including WT1 quantification, were performed monthly for the first six months, every three months until one year and then every six months. WT1 transcript levels were quantified in Bone Marrow (BM) by RQ-PCR, with TaqMan technology on RNA from mononucleated cells. The housekeeping gene ABL was used as control gene, with WT1 level being normalized to 10^4 copies of ABL per sample. The cut-off value for WT1 positivity in BM samples was 250 copies/10^4 copies of ABL. Results: at transplant 38 pts (70%) were in CR, 12 pts (22%) had refractory disease, in 4 pts (8%) BM was not evaluable and no leukemic blasts were detectable in the peripheral blood. Median follow up (FU) after allo-HSCT was of 18 months (range: 4–42). At day 30 after transplant hematologic and cytogenetic CR and full donor chimerism (STR) were documented in all 54 pts, with a median BM WT1 value of 118/10e4 ABL (range: 0–10118). 23/54 pts (43%) relapsed at a median time of 180 days after allo-HSCT (range: 60–780). Correlation of post-transplant clinical outcome and WT1 expression levels identified: 1) 24 pts in continuous CR until last FU and BM WT1 levels persistently negative; 2) 13 pts who relapsed and showed an increase of BM WT1 levels above 250 at a median time of 40 days (range: 20–80) before hematological relapse and lose of full donor chimerism; 3) 9 pts who relapsed with WT1 increase concomitant with hematological relapse. These pts missed one or more of planned disease evaluations before relapse; 4) 1 patient who relapsed without documentation of WT1 increase; 5) 7 pts who maintained the CR but showed a transient increase of BM WT1 above 250 at one or two consecutive point of FU with normalization at subsequent evaluations. In 3 of these 7 pts concomitant GvHD was documented and in 4 pts ongoing immunosuppression was discontinued shortly after WT1 data had been obtained. Conclusions: WT1 expression levels in BM are effective in predicting AML/MDS relapse after allo-HSCT thus anticipating the appearance of leukemic blasts and of host chimerism. Our data prompt the use of WT1 based MRD monitoring for tailoring ‘pre-emptive' therapeutic approaches based on exploitation of donor immunity and its putative Graft-versus-Leukemia effect. In several patents the time occurring between WT1 MRD positive results and the clinical recurrence of the disease was relatively short, thus in order to detect disease relapse in time for therapeutic intervention we suggest a monthly monitoring of WT1 levels at least for the first year after allo-HSCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 548-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Hubmann ◽  
Ralph Burkhardt ◽  
Georg Franke ◽  
Michael Cross ◽  
Markus Scholz ◽  
...  

Abstract HCT following reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) relies mainly on immunological effects for disease control. The early detection and quantification of minimal residual disease and the timely adjustment of immune suppression are therefore particularly important in this setting. Since appropriate disease-specific gene markers are available only in a minority of patients with acute leukemias or MDS, the potential of both donor chimerism and Wilms Tumor gene 1 (WT1) expression to provide quantification of MRD was investigated. Patients and Methods: Ninety-five consecutive patients with AML (n=68), ALL (n=7) and intermediate/high-risk MDS (n=20) were analyzed. Patients were 60 (median; range 21–74) years old and in CR1 (n=45), CR2 (n=25), or more advanced disease status (n=25). Grafts were obtained either from related (n=24) or unrelated (n=71) donors. Conditioning regimens consisted of fludarabine 30mg/kg BW day -4 to -2 (n=90) and total body irradiation with 2 Gy at day 0 (n=95), and post-transplant immunosuppression employed cyclosporin A and mycophenolate mofetil. Total donor chimerism (TDC, n=93 patients, 236 samples), CD34+− chimerism (n=89, 219 samples) and disease-specific molecular markers detected by FISH (DSM, n=39, 77 samples) were all determined prospectively from bone marrow (BM) samples at baseline and on days +28, +56 and +84 post-transplant. WT1 expression was analyzed retrospectively by RT-PCR from stored peripheral blood (PB) samples (n=95, 321) from the same time points. Results: With a median follow-up of 11.7 (range 2–61) months, 34 (36%) patients relapsed (defined by BM blasts >5%). Since complete results from all techniques were available up to day 84, we analyzed the diagnostic power of all methods to predict hematological relapse one month in advance up until the fourth month after HCT (n=21 patients, 22%). First, we estimated the value of the three different prospective MRD techniques (DSM, TDC and CD34+ chimerism) using Receiver Operating Curves (ROC). Relapse was predicted 1 month in advance by CD34+−chimerism [p= 0.001, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.875], but not by TDC or DSM, (n=30). The cut-off value of 5% decrease in CD34+ chimerism in a one month period achieved a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 91%. In comparison, WT1 expression was similarly associated with a pending relapse (p< 0.0001, AUC = 0.861). The optimal cut-off value of 24 WT-1 copies per 10000 ABL copies was assessed by ROC and resulted in a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 91%. In a logistic regression model, we estimated the ratios of the odds of relapsing within the next month. WT1 achieved a higher odds ratio (36/1) than CD34+ chimerism (25/1). Combining both techniques yielded a specificity of 98% and an odds ratio of 72/1 Conclusion: WT1 expression in PB and CD34+ chimerism in BM are superior to full donor chimerism and disease-specific markers determined by FISH in predicting relapse in all patients with acute leukemia and MDS. Both markers are suitable to develop effective post-transplant treatment strategies to further decrease the relapse rate using immunological or cytotoxic approaches.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengmeng Yin ◽  
Aiguo Liu ◽  
Ai Zhang ◽  
Yaqin Wang ◽  
Qun Hu

Abstract Background: Wilms’ Tumor Gene 1 (WT1) is a potential valuable parameter in prognosis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, studies on prevalence of WT1 and its correlation to clinical features and prognosis in pediatric patients were not well done. In this study we attempted to identify the correlation between WT1 and childhood ALL.Methods: The expression levels of WT1 in bone marrow cells of 188 children diagnosed with ALL from 2015 to 2018 were detected using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR). The relationship between expression levels of WT1 and patients’ characteristics, remission status (complete remission/relapse), fusion genes and prognosis of childhood ALL were analyzed and revealed. Results: 1. 147 (78.2%) cases had positive WT1 expression, and the average level was 1.76 (0.3, 6.03) %. 2. The CR and relapse rates of ALL children with positive WT1 were not significantly different from those of WT1 negative group, respectively (87.76% vs 82.93%, P=0.42 and 14.29% vs 17.1%, P=0.658). 3. The WT1 expression level in patients at CR was significantly lower than when at diagnosis (P<0.001) and the expression of WT1 increased obviously after induction therapy in 21 patients who relapsed (P=0.003) .4. The WT1 expression was related to lymphadenectasis (P=0.004) and immunophenotyping (P=0.009), but not to fusion genes (P=0.912). Conclusion: The WT1 in ALL children can be employed as an independent tool to evaluate the prognosis and curative effect of the disease.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2250-2250
Author(s):  
XiaoWen Tang ◽  
Xiaoji Lin ◽  
Aijing Wang ◽  
Feng Chen ◽  
Xiao Ma ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of IFN-α-2b pre-emptive therapy for acute leukemia(AL) patients with relapsing tendencies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Methods: Retrospectively analyzed 986 acute leukemia patients undergoing allo-HSCT from Jan ,2006 to Mar ,2014 in our hospital. After allo-HSCT, 986 AL patients were periodically monitored the minimal residual disease(MRD) including: bone marrow smear, leukemia-associated immunophenotype (LAIP), leukemia specific or related fusion genes, and donor chimerism through multi-parameter detection to evaluate disease status. Patients were given IFN- a -2b 3 million units / day by subcutaneous injection for preemptive treatment once a relapse tendency was detected, such as: increasing proportion of blast in bone marrowbetween 3-5%, or MRD>1.0×10-3, or leukemia specific fusion gene transfrom negative to positive, or dynamic incressing copy number of WT1 more than 200 copies/104 abl, or decreasing of donor chimerism(≤ 90%). There were 98 patients who presented increasing tendency of MRD and were enrolled in this study. Among them, 31 patients received IFN-α-2b pre-emptive therapy, and 67 patients received non-IFN-α-2b therapy such as: withdraw immunosupressant, traditional DLI or DC-CIK immunotherapy. Results: There were no significant differences in disease characteristics between two groups. For the 31 patients who received IFN-α-2b pre-emptive therapy(IFN group), the median time of IFN-αtreatment was 60 days (range: 5-720 days), Twenty five patients had responsed to the treatment without progressing to hematological relapse (response rate 80.6%). 2 patients developed to hematological relapse again after temporary response; 3 patients had no response and eventually progressed to hematological relapse. Regarding 67patients who received non-IFN-α-2b therapy(non IFN group), 22 patients responsed to the treatment (RR 32.8%), 45 patients failed to the treatment and progressed to hematological relapse at a median time of 35 (range: 6-940) days, There was significant difference of RR between two group(P=0.000) . 31 patients of IFN group tolerate well and no patient terminated therapy due to side effects. During the treatment of IFN, 18 patients(58.1%) developed GVHD: 6 patients (19.4%) with aGVHD and 14 (45.2%) with limited cGVHD . The median follow-up time was 21 (4.5-78.5) months. 22 of 31 cases of IFN group maintained disease-free survival. The 5-year overall survival rate (OS) and the leukemia-free survival rate (LFS) of IFN group were 47.0%±13.9% and 38.7%±13.1% respectively. However, the 5-yr OS and LFS of non IFN group were 14.5%±10.7% and12.5%±9.4% respectively.The difference were significantly (P=0.000,P=0.002 respectively). Patients with GVHD had significantly better response than patients without GVHD (88.9% vs 53.8%, P=0.043, P <0.05). Conclusion: IFN-α-2b pre-emptive therapy can effectively prevent high-risk patients with relapsing tendencies for disease progression post allo-HSCT. Further large-scale investigation is warranted. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1995 ◽  
Vol 270 (30) ◽  
pp. 17908-17912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Hewitt ◽  
Gail C. Fraizer ◽  
Grady F. Saunders

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document