The Effect of Bortezomib (B) Alone or in Combination with Other Agents for Stem Cell Mobilization in Mice

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 583-583
Author(s):  
Armin Ghobadi ◽  
Matthew Holt ◽  
Julie Ritchey ◽  
John F. DiPersio

Abstract Abstract 583 Introduction: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the most commonly used drug for stem cell mobilization. Unfortunately, 5–30% of patients fail to collect sufficient hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) necessary for transplant. New strategies are needed to increase HSPCs collection in these patients. Apart from cytotoxic effect, bortezomib decreases expression of cell adhesion molecules including VCAM-1. Therefore, we hypothesize that bortezomib can mobilize HSPCs. Method: C57BL/6 (B6) mice were injected with intravenous (IV) bortezomib (0.8 mg/kg) or Phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Blood were harvested at baseline and 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 hours (h) after injections and plated on MethoCult media (StemCell Technologies). For evaluation of mechanism and source of mobilized HSPCs, bortezomib versus PBS experiments were performed in splenectomized B6 mice and VLA4 knockout (VLA4KO) mice in addition to B6 mice. Experiments involving combination of bortezomib with G-CSF, AMD3100, and Cytoxan were also conducted in B6 mice. In bortezomib-G-CSF group (BG), bortezomib was given on day1 and G-CSF (250 μg/kg subcutaneously) was given on days 2, 3, 4, and 5. In G-CSF-bortezomib group (GB), G-CSF was given on days 2, 3, 4, and 5 and bortezomib was given on day 5. G-CSF (G) control group received G-CSF on days 2, 3, 4, and 5. In bortezomib-AMD3100 group (BA), bortezomib was given at baseline and AMD3100 (5 mg/kg subcutaneously) was given 15 h after bortezomib. In PBS-AMD3100 control group (PA), bortezomib at baseline in BA group was substituted with PBS. In cyclophosphamide-G-CSF group (CG), cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg intraperitoneal) was given at baseline and G-CSF was given on days 2, 3, 4, and 5. In cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-G-CSF group (CBG), bortezomib at baseline was added to CG experiment. Results: Bortezomib compared with PBS in B6 mice resulted in a significantly higher CFU-C 12 h to 18 h after baseline injections (mean peak CFU-C: 680/ml vs. 100/ml respectively, fold increase in CFU-C: 6.8 vs. 0.8 respectively, P = 0.0002) (Figure 1). In bortezomib group, CFU-C remained at peak from 12 h to 18 h and returned close to baseline 24 h after bortezomib. White blood cell (WBC) peak of 1.5 fold over baseline was observed 12 h to 15 h after bortezomib. There was no statistically significant difference in bortezomib HSPC mobilization in non-splenectomized vs. splenectomized mice (mean peak of 580/ml vs. 550/ml respectively, P = 0.89). In VLA4KO experiments, there was no statistically significant difference in peak CFU-C in bortezomib group versus PBS group (mean 730/ml vs. 590/ml respectively, P = 0.18) suggesting no HSPC mobilization effect for bortezomib in VLA4KO mice (Figure 2). In bortezomib plus G-CSF (BG) experiments, peak CFU-C on day 6 in BG group was significantly higher than G-CSF group (mean peak CFU-C: 4700/ml vs. 2400/ml respectively, P = 0.005). In G-CSF plus bortezomib (GB) experiments, peak CFU-C on day 6 in GB group was significantly higher than G-CSF group (mean peak CFU-C: 5600/ml vs. 2400/ml respectively, P = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in peak CFU-C in BG vs. GB groups (P = 0.28). In bortezomib plus AMD3100 (BA) vs. PBS plus AMD3100 (PA) experiments, peak CFU-C 3 h after AMD3100 in BA group was significantly higher than PA group (peak CFU-C: 2600/ml vs. 1100/ml respectively, fold increase in CFU-C: 105 vs. 12.5 respectively, P = 0.01) (Figure 3). In cyclophosphamide-G-CSF (CG) vs. cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-G-CSF (CBG) chemomobilization experiments, CBG compared to CG resulted in a trend toward higher CFU-C peak on day 6 (23500/ml vs. 21000/ml respectively, P = 0.49) and higher CFU-C on day 7 (14200/ml vs. 8700/ml respectively, P = 0.03). Conclusion: Bortezomib is a potent HSPC mobilizer drug, augment AMD3100 and G-CSF mobilization in at least an additive fashion, and increase and extend chemomobization effect of cyclophosphamide. Bortezomib mobilization mechanism probably involves VLA4/VCAM-1 axis. Bone marrow rather than spleen is the source of HSPC's mobilized by bortezomib. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3228-3228
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Berger ◽  
Christopher Seet ◽  
Mala Parthasarathy ◽  
Tulio Rodriguez ◽  
Scott E. Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3228 Poster Board III-165 Introduction Using standard dose G-CSF (10 μg/kg) for stem cell mobilization, 25-40% of patients, deemed to be hard to mobilize based on prior therapy, will not collect sufficient HSC (> 2-2.5 × 106 CD34/kg) to proceed to a prompt autotransplant. Strategies to improve CD34/kg yields have included dose escalating G-CSF up to 30 μg/kg or combining G-CSF and GM-CSF. While dose escalated G-CSF is effective in increasing CD34 yields in normal donors as is the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF, their comparative value in pre-treated patients has not been tested. To determine the value of these strategies, we performed a randomized comparison of high dose G-CSF (30 μg/kg as 2 doses 12 hours apart), to the combination of simultaneous single daily doses of G-CSF (10 μg/kg) plus GM-CSF (5 μg/kg), to a control group receiving G-CSF at an equivalent total dose of cytokine to the combination arm (15μg/kg) as a single dose. Patients and Methods Patients were eligible if heavily pre-treated, defined as: a minimum of 10 total cycles of combination chemotherapy and two prior regimens, or a total of 6 chemotherapy cycles if the patient also received RT to marrow bearing sites, platinum-based chemotherapy or 2 or more cycles of any BCNU or fludarabine containing regimen. Baseline WBC had to be > 3000/μl, ANC > 1500/μl and a platelets > 100,000/μl. Twelve liter aphereses began on day 5 of mobilization, and continued until ≥ 4 × 106 CD34/kg were collected or a maximum of 5 aphereses. Patients typically proceeded to transplant if they had ≥ 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg collected and were always re-mobilized if they collected < 2.0 × 106 CD34/kg. CD34 subsets (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) were also assessed for the 3 groups to determine if more primitive HSC were mobilized by the 2 novel strategies. The sample size was calculated based as follows: 60% of the control group would collect 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg and this would rise to 90% in one or both study arms. The detection of such differences with a power of 80% and a 2-sided alpha level of 0.025 required a total sample of 120 patients. Results A total of 120 patients were randomized; 119 were eligible. Patient demographics, shown in the Table, were matched among the three groups: The % of patients collecting ≥2.5 × 106 CD34/kg was: standard G: 60%, high dose G: 57% (p = 1.0), G + GM: 41% (p = 0.1). Median CD34 collected in first mobilization were, 3.6 × 106/kg, 3.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.22) and 2.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.05) respectively in a median of 4, 4, and 5 aphereses (p = NS). Re-mobilization rates: standard G; 37.5%, high dose G: 35%; G + GM: 50% (p = NS). Total median CD34 collected from first and any second mobilizations were: standard G: 4.8 × 106/kg, high dose G: 3.9 × 106/kg, and G + GM: 3.5 × 106/kg. One patient in the standard G arm and 3 in high dose G did not proceed to transplant due to poor initial mobilization and progression in 2, and one each for progression or poor mobilization alone. There were no significant differences in median engraftment times: for ANC, 10, 11 and 15 days respectively for the standard G-, high dose G- and G + GM arms and for platelets, 11, 13 and 14 days respectively. The overall survivals @ the median f/u time of 37 months were 59.8%, 61.8% and 48.1% respectively (p = 0.272) for the three groups. The % primitive HSC (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) from the first mobilization were identical in the 3 patient groups. Conclusions We found no advantage to dose escalated G-CSF nor to the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF to mobilize HSC for autotransplantation in heavily pre-treated patients. We also did not find higher numbers of more primitive CD34 subsets mobilized by these newer strategies. Alternative approaches, e.g. the combination of plerixifor + standard dose G-CSF (Stiff et al: BBMT; 15:249-56, 2009) would appear to be the preferred method of initial HSC mobilization for heavily pre-treated patients. Disclosures Stiff: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-239
Author(s):  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
Sylwia Oborska ◽  
Joanna Romejko-Jarosinska ◽  
Jarosław Dybko ◽  
Joanna Mańko ◽  
...  

AbstractAutologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) requires collection of sufficient number of hematopoietic stem cells. The goal of this study was to evaluate efficacy of plerixafor used in patients with lymphoid malignancies failing conventional stem cell mobilization.This was a prospective, non-interventional study. All consecutive patients (n = 109) treated with plerixafor in 11 centers were reported. The drug was used either in case of previous mobilization failure (n = 67) or interventionally, in case of insufficient CD34+ cell output during current mobilization (n = 42). Successful mobilization was defined as resulting in collection of ≥ 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for single autoHSCT or ≥ 4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for double procedure.The overall rate of successful mobilization was 55% (55% for single and 56% for double autoHSCT). The median total number of collected CD34+ cells/kg was 2.4 (range, 0-11.5) for patients intended for a single transplantation while 4.0 (0.6-16.9) for double procedure. The number of circulating CD34+ cells increased after the use of plerixafor regardless of baseline values. The median fold increase was 3.3 (0.3-155). Data from this observational study confirm high efficacy of plerixafor used in routine clinical practice as salvage for patients with lymphoid malignancies failing conventional stem cell mobilization.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 513-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armin Ghobadi ◽  
Michael P. Rettig ◽  
Matthew Holt ◽  
Julie Ritchey ◽  
Linda Eissenberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the most commonly used drug for stem cell mobilization. Unfortunately, 5-30% of patients fail to collect sufficient hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) to proceed to transplant. New strategies are needed to increase HSPCs collection in these patients. We previously reported that bortezomib directly and rapidly mobilizes HSPCs in mice by modulating the VLA-4/VCAM-1 axis (Ghobadi A et al. Blood 2014, 124: 2742-2753). Ixazomib (MLN9708) is a next-generation small-molecule proteasome inhibitor that has several potential advantages over bortezomib including oral route of administration. Here we study the effect of ixazomib on stem cell mobilization in mice. Methods: DBA mice were treated with: (1) ixazomib via oral gavage (o.g., 8 mg/kg), (2) a single intravenous (iv) dose of bortezomib (0.8 mg/kg), (3) AMD3100 (5 mg/kg) SC, and (4) control diluent for ixazomib (2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin [HPBCD]). Blood was harvested at baseline and 12, 15, and 24 hours (h) after ixazomib and bortezomib administration and at 3 hours and 12 hours after AMD3100 administration. Harvested peripheral blood (PB) was plated on MethoCult media (Stem Cell Technologies) for colony forming unit-cells (CFU-C) enumeration. Results: Compared to vehicle (ixazomib diluent, 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin [HPBCD]), ixazomib mobilized significantly more peripheral blood colony forming unit-cells (CFU-C) at 12 - 15 h after administration (mean peak CFU-C: 105/ml vs. 870/ml respectively, i.e., a 0.6 vs. 5-fold increase in CFU-C , P < 0.02; Figure 1A). The majority of CFU-Cs mobilized by ixazomib were CFU-GM (CFU-granulocyte and monocyte, Figure 1B). The magnitude and kinetics of HSPC mobilization in the single ixazomib oral gavage group was identical to a single dose of IV bortezomib (Figure 1C, mean peak of 870/ml vs. 975/ml respectively, P > 0.66). There was no statistically significant difference in peak HSPC mobilization between the ixazomib (12 h after ixazomib administration) and AMD3100 groups (3 h after AMD3100 administration) (mean peak of 870/ml vs. 1240/ml respectively, P = 0.36) suggesting that ixazomib is a potent HSPC mobilizing agent (Figure 1D) with intermediate mobilization kinetics compared to AMD3100 (2-3 hours) and G-CSF (5-6 days) and with identical kinetics to IV bortezomib (12-15 hours). Conclusion: Ixazomib is a potent and modestly rapid HSPC mobilizer agent in mice. Kinetics and magnitude of HSPC mobilization by ixazomib is identical to bortezomib. Trials to assess proteasome inhibitors as mobilizing agents are currently underway at Washington University. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2141-2141
Author(s):  
Cesare Perotti ◽  
Claudia Del Fante ◽  
Gianluca Viarengo ◽  
Marcello Maestri ◽  
Laura Salvaneschi

Abstract Abstract 2141 Poster Board II-118 Background: CD133+ (Prominin-1 positive) is a 5-transmembrane glycoprotein that identifies immature progenitor stem cells. Immature hematopoietic stem cells retain the possibility to give origin to tissues different from hematopoietic cell lines (transdifferentiation). Material and methods: In this preliminary study we investigated the possibility to mobilize, collect, immunoselect and reinfuse autologous CD133+ immature stem cells in liver cancer patients. This approach was adopted to obtain, in a short time, an adequate volume increase of the disease free liver thus extending the resectability criteria of the liver, with the final goal to prolong survival. We enrolled 4 patients with a large liver cancer and no chance of resection. The mobilization protocol consisted in: G-CSF administration (10 μg/kg/day ) for 3-5 days, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) monitoring starting from the 3rd day, leukapheresis (LKF) collection processing 3 blood volumes when CD133+ cells>15 μL. Patients were monitored during mobilization, collection and post collection phase for clinical status, blood pressure and bleeding. Positive CD133+ immunoselection (Miltenyi Clinimacs) was performed on LKF product after overnight storage. Quality controls on positive fraction consisted in viability and purity of CD133+ cells by cytofluorimetric analysis and clonogenic assays. Microbial tests were performed on the negative fraction. After LKF, patients underwent right portal embolization and infusion of CD133+ cells into the opposite portal vein by a percutaneous access. Evaluation of liver regeneration was performed 30 days after stem cell infusion by spiral CT and galactose clearance. Liver resection was carried out if liver regeneration reached 30-40%. Results: Stem cell mobilization, LKF content and immunoselected cells are detailed in tab 1. No relevant side effects were observed. We obtained an efficient stem cell mobilization in all patients enrolled. No bacterial or fungal contamination was observed in cells infused. Results about liver regeneration and patients' follow up are detailed in table 2. Conclusions: Our approach to liver regeneration was feasible and safe with no relevant side effects. We observed an efficient stem cell mobilization comparable to healthy donors also in liver cancer patients. The infusion of CD133+ cells allowed a significant hepatic tissue regeneration in all patients. Controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm our preliminary results. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pantelis Tsirkinidis ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Georgios Boutsikas ◽  
Athanasios Papatheodorou ◽  
Konstantinos Anargyrou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document