Visualization Of Normal and Malignant Epigenetic Regulation In Hematopoiesis Utilizing Newly-Developed Histone Variant H3.3 Chipseq Analysis

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1189-1189
Author(s):  
Jun Odawara ◽  
Kohta Miyawaki ◽  
Junichiro Yuda ◽  
Masayasu Hayashi ◽  
Kazumitsu Maehara ◽  
...  

Abstract Cell differentiation is achieved by sequential gene expression. Late differentiation marker genes are already regulated at the chromatin level prior to differentiation in embryonic stem cells and many cell line models. Therefore, we hypothesized that ‘stem-ness’ of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) are programmed by epigenetic mechanisms and attempted to reveal the molecular mechanisms in hematopoietic gene expression. Histone H3 molecule, which is one of the most basic components of chromatin, has at least three variants: H3.1, H3.2, and H3.3. Previous studies have shown that one of the H3 variants, H3.3, was consistent with open chromatin structure. Here we found that the incorporation of histone variant H3.3 initiates on hematopoietic genes in HSPCs prior to differentiation. HSPC fractions were purified from C57BL/6J mouse bone marrow, and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIPSeq) analysis was performed using newly-established monoclonal antibodies that specifically recognize endogenous H3.3. Although previous conventional studies have demonstrated that H3.3 deposition dominantly occurred in the “gene body”, our sensitive ChIPSeq analysis revealed that more than half of the H3.3 existed in the inter-genic regions around hematopoietic genes. The region of H3.3 incorporation changed during differentiation, i.e., virtually all genes were marked with H3.3 in embryonic stem cells, while all hematopoietic genes were marked with H3.3 in LSK, and more lineage specific genes were marked when cells are differentiated. Furthermore, our analysis visualized that within the regions incorporated with H3.3, transcriptionally active regions marked by H3K4me3 and repressed regions marked by H3K27me3 are mutually exclusive. These data suggest that in hematopoietic differentiation, H3.3 incorporation initiates around relatively wide ranges of hematopoietic genes, and then either of active or repressive histone modification sequentially occurs. Interestingly, in leukemic cells, such selective H3.3 incorporation appeared to be disorganized. To identify factors that induce H3.3 incorporation defect in leukemic cells, we used a public database provided by the ENCODE project. We have constructed a system to manage all these datasets and to comprehensively explore the factors closely related to H3.3. Interestingly, correlations of our H3.3 ChIPSeq data with the ENCODE transcription factors’ binding site data were significantly different between analyses of AML and normal cells. By this approach, we identified hematopoietic transcription factors such as CEBPB and YY1 were associated with impaired H3.3 incorporation in AML. In addition, by comparing these transcription factors and single nucleotide variants (SNVs) obtained from Exome-Sequence, we found links between these transcription factors and particular SNVs in common pathways. These data suggest that this H3.3 ChIPSeq analysis should also be useful to extract oncogenic variants from many SNVs obtained by conventional Exome-Sequence analysis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1193-1193
Author(s):  
Jun Odawara ◽  
Kohta Miyawaki ◽  
Kentaro Kohno ◽  
Takahiro Shima ◽  
Kazumitsu Maehara ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1193 Cell differentiation is achieved by sequential gene expression. Late differentiation marker genes are already regulated at the chromatin level prior to differentiation, even in pluripotent stem cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that “stem-ness” in hematopoiesis is already programmed in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) and attempted to reveal the molecular mechanisms of epigenetic regulations in hematopoietic gene expression. Histone H3 molecule, which is one of the most basic component of chromatin, has at least three variants:H3.1, H3.2, and H3.3. In previous study, it is known that one of H3 variants H3.3 was consistent with open chromatin structure. Only limited organisms which have complex differentiation mechanisms such as mammals have all three variants, suggesting that these histone variants significantly correlate with differentiation. Therefore, we focused on these H3 variants incorporation patterns in HSPCs, and found that the deposition of histone variant H3.3, that is a marker of open chromatin regions, specifically occurred on hematopoietic genes in HSPCs prior to differentiation. HSPC fractions were purified from C57BL/6J mouse bone marrow, and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequence analyses were performed utilizing monoclonal antibodies that specifically recognize H3.3. Although previous studies demonstrated that H3.3 deposition dominantly occurred in the “gene body”, our informatics analysis revealed that more than half of H3.3 existed in the inter-genic regions around hematopoietic genes. The region of H3.3 incorporation changed during differentiation, i.e., almost all of genes were marked with H3.3 in embryonic stem cells, while almost all of hematopoietic genes were marked with H3.3 in LSK, and more lineage specific genes were marked with H3.3 when the differentiation occurred. To explore the factor dependency of the deposition of H3.3, we examined H3.3 incorporation around binding sites of more than 20 different types of transcription factors. The binding sites of Oct3/4, Klf4, Sox2, and Myc, also known as iPS factors, were strongly correlated with H3.3 incorporation sites in embryonic stem cells, while in HSPCs, the incorporated regions of H3.3 significantly co-localized with the binding sites of several hematopoietic key transcription factors such as Scl and Runx1. When we knocked down Oct3/4 in embryonic stem cells, these H3.3 incorporations and differentiation marker genes expressions were diminished, on the other hand, when we knocked down H3.3 in embryonic stem cells, well-ordered differentiation marker genes expressions were suppressed. These data suggest that H3.3 incorporations by key transcription factors are the essences of the “stem-ness”. Interestingly, in leukemic cells, this selective H3.3 incorporation was not observed, suggesting that H3.3 incorporation could reflect the orderly progression of normal hematopoiesis. In conclusion, we found that the incorporation of H3.3 is the earliest epigenetic event involved in determining hematopoietic cell fate. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3613-3613
Author(s):  
Claudia Lengerke ◽  
Yuan Wang ◽  
Frank Yates ◽  
Leila Maouche-Chretien ◽  
George Q. Daley

Abstract Cdx4 and cdx1, members of the caudal family of homeodomain-containing transcriptional regulators, are important for specifying the hematopoietic fate of mesoderm in the zebrafish. We have shown that the cdx4 gene plays a role in enhancing hematopoietic fate during in vitro differentiation of murine ESCs (Davidson et al., Nature 2003). Cdx4 induces hox genes, and genetic modification of mESCs with a combination of cdx4 and hoxb4 promotes long-term engraftment of ESC-derived HSCs in lethally irradiated primary and secondary mice (Wang et al, submitted). While cdx1 is known to be a direct target of signaling by the embryonic morphogens fgf, wnt3a, and retinoids, morphogens acting upstream of cdx4 have not yet been defined. Our goal is to determine optimal morphogen conditions for hematopoietic commitment from murine embryonic stem cells by evaluating activation of the cdx-hox pathway. We have developed quantitative RT-PCR assays for the cdx genes (cdx4, cdx1 and cdx2) and multiple hox genes as well as markers specific to hematopoietic stem cells and lineages. We have used these assays, together with a reporter line engineered to express GFP from the brachury locus (Fehling et al., Development 2003), to characterize the conditions for mesodermal induction and hematopoietic fate specification following addition of morphogens to differentiating cultures of ES cells under serum-free conditions. Among all morphogens tested (BMP4, activin, nodal, wnt3a, wnt5a, sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog, retinoic acid), only BMP4 has been found to strongly induce CDX4 gene expression within the developing embryoid bodies, while addition of the BMP4 inhibitor noggin to serum suppressed CDX4 expression. Addition of BMP4 significantly increases the number of emerging CD41+ and CD45+ cells, the precursors of definitive hematopoietic stem cells. We are currently analyzing the functional changes following BMP4 exposure, and correlating hematopoietic maturation with changes in the Hox gene expression pattern. Analysis of the cdx-hox gene pathway provides a means of otpimizing induction of hematopoietic fate by application of embryonic morphogens.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad B. Aljazi ◽  
Yuen Gao ◽  
Yan Wu ◽  
George I. Mias ◽  
Jin He

SummaryThe recruitment of Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) to gene promoters is critical for its function in repressing gene expression in murine embryonic stem cells (mESCs). However, previous studies have demonstrated although the expression of early lineage-specific genes is largely repressed, the genome-wide PRC2 occupancy is unexpectedly reduced in naïve mESCs. In this study, we provide evidence to show the FGF/ERK signaling determines the global PRC2 occupancy through regulating the expression of PRC2-recruting factor JARID2 in naïve mESCs. At the transcriptional level, the de-repression of bivalent genes is predominantly determined by the presence of cell signaling-associated transcription factors but not the status of PRC2 occupancy at gene promoters. Hence, this study not only reveals a key molecular mechanism by which the FGF/ERK signaling in regulating the PRC2 occupancy in mESCs, but also elucidates a fundamental question regarding the functional roles of transcription factors and Polycomb-mediated epigenetic mechanisms in transcriptional regulation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 01 (03) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malini Krishnamoorthy ◽  
Brian Gerwe ◽  
Jamie Heimburg-Molinaro ◽  
Rachel Nash ◽  
Jagan Arumugham ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ping Huang ◽  
Jieying Zhu ◽  
Yu Liu ◽  
Guihuan Liu ◽  
Ran Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Four transcription factors, Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (the Yamanka factors), can reprogram somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Many studies have provided a number of alternative combinations to the non-Yamanaka factors. However, it is clear that many additional transcription factors that can generate iPSCs remain to be discovered. Methods The chromatin accessibility and transcriptional level of human embryonic stem cells and human urine cells were compared by Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to identify potential reprogramming factors. Selected transcription factors were employed to reprogram urine cells, and the reprogramming efficiency was measured. Urine-derived iPSCs were detected for pluripotency by Immunofluorescence, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RNA sequencing and teratoma formation test. Finally, we assessed the differentiation potential of the new iPSCs to cardiomyocytes in vitro. Results ATAC-seq and RNA-seq datasets predicted TEAD2, TEAD4 and ZIC3 as potential factors involved in urine cell reprogramming. Transfection of TEAD2, TEAD4 and ZIC3 (in the presence of Yamanaka factors) significantly improved the reprogramming efficiency of urine cells. We confirmed that the newly generated iPSCs possessed pluripotency characteristics similar to normal H1 embryonic stem cells. We also confirmed that the new iPSCs could differentiate to functional cardiomyocytes. Conclusions In conclusion, TEAD2, TEAD4 and ZIC3 can increase the efficiency of reprogramming human urine cells into iPSCs, and provides a new stem cell sources for the clinical application and modeling of cardiovascular disease. Graphical abstract


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili An ◽  
Yanming Li ◽  
Yingjun Fan ◽  
Ning He ◽  
Fanlei Ran ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document