scholarly journals Allogeneic but Not Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Attenuates the Negative Prognostic Impact Dictated By Pretransplant MRD Positivity

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2363-2363
Author(s):  
Francesco Buccisano ◽  
Luca Maurillo ◽  
Maria Ilaria Del Principe ◽  
Gottardo De Angelis ◽  
Raffaella Cerretti ◽  
...  

Abstract Multiparametric flow cytometry (MPFC) detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) represents a robust surrogate for the quality of complete remission (CR) and reliably predicts clinical outcome. In our experience, MRD detection provides prognostically relevant information when assessed at the post-consolidation time point. Ten years ago we demonstrated that the amount of MRD before autologous stem cell transplant (AuSCT) affected outcome. More recently, other authors have extended this observation to allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) showing that pre-transplant MRD is a major determinant of prognosis regardless of graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. The aim of our study was to evaluate, in an extended series of patients submitted to AuSCT or ASCT, the impact of a pre-transplantation MRD positive (MRDpos) or negative (MRDneg) status on overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS). We analyzed 173 MRDpos and 53 MRDneg patients of whom 67 were submitted to AuSCT and 51 to ASCT. Eighty-two patients received no transplant because of age, poor performance status or insufficient stem cell harvest whereas 26, all in the MRDpos group, relapsed before transplant delivery. In the AuSCT group, before transplant, 32/67 (48%) were MRDneg and 35/67 (52%) MRDpos, with MRDneg group showing a superior OS (55% vs 20%, p=0.007). In the ASCT group, before transplant, 45/51 (88%) were MRDpos and 6/51 (12%) MRDneg. For 21 out of 51 (41%) sources of stem cells were matched unrelated donors (12) or haploidentical donors (9). In this subgroup, MRDpos and MRDneg patients shared a comparable 5-years OS (60% vs 56%, p=NS), with a 36% survival gain for those MRDpos who received ASCT as compared to AuSCT. Among MRDneg patients, no survival differences were demonstrated between those submitted to AuSCT or ASCT (55% vs 60%, p=NS). Such a lack of difference is likely due to the higher treatment related mortality (ASCT 3/6, 50% vs AuSCT 2/32, 6%, p=0.003) which counterbalanced the lower relapse rate in the ASCT group (ASCT 0/6, 0% vs AuSCT 11/32, 34%, p=NS). In conclusion, ASCT confers a significant survival advantage to MRDpos patients, attenuating the negative prognostic impact of pre-transplant MRD positivity. ASCT may expose MRDneg patients to an excess of toxicity suggesting that in these patients the allogeneic option should be postponed after a second remission. In MRDpos patients, AuSCT does not represent a valid therapeutic choice and ASCT, which should be timely delivered, also considering alternative sources of stem cells. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5311-5311
Author(s):  
Linda J. Patchett ◽  
John M. Hill ◽  
Thomas F. Fitzmaurice ◽  
Kenneth R. Meehan

Abstract In order to contain costs, MDs must first identify the clinical factors contributing to increased resource utilization associated with an autologous stem cell transplant. We performed a retrospective clinical and cost analysis of all autologous transplants performed at Dartmouth- Hitchcock Medical Center over a 30 month period (2002-2004) and identified patients who had a prolonged length of stay > 25 d (PLOS). We pinpointed the clinical characteristics and hospital course of each patient to identify trends. The hospital cost-accounting system highlighted resource utilization and costs of the transplants, allowing a comparison between patients with a PLOS and all other transplant patients. PROLONGED LENGTH OF STAY (PLOS) Results: All Patients LOS < 25 days LOS > 25 days # of patients 87(100%) 58 (67%) 29 (33%) LOS (days) Mean (Median) 24 (22) 20 (20) 31 (31) DISEASE (n = no. of patients) AML 14 9 5 HD/NHL 44 24 20 MM 28 25 3 Other (ITP) 1 1 ENGRAFTMENT (median) ANC > 500 (Platelets > 20K) 12 (18) 11 (16) 13 (27) TRANSFUSIONS UNITS /PT (median) RBC /Platelets > 20 4 (3) 3 (2) 7 (7) PARENTAL NUTRITION (TPN) # of days (median) 9 6 14 TOXICITIES >= GRADE 3 NCI (Common Toxicitity Criteria) Nausea and Vomiting 36% 77% Diarrhea 9% 45% Mucositis 36% 41% Anorexia 57% 83% INFECTION RATE 10% 34% ICU TRANSFER 3% 3% Major contributors to costs included nursing/daily room charge costs (39%), pharmacy (39%), Blood Bank (6%), Laboratory (12%), and other costs (3%). The average daily costs are $4252. The PLOS cohort had grade > 3 toxicity, increased infection rate, engrafted later and required more transfusional support. 1 pt was transferred to the ICU for temporary management. Of the 29 patients identified with PLOS, none died and all were discharged from the hospital. 45% of NHL/HD patients experienced a prolonged LOS, representing 68% of the PLOS cohort. The median LOS<25d is 20d and the median LOS>25d is 30.5d. At an average daily cost of $4252, these additional 10.5 days of hospitalization costs are substantial. Based on these findings, identification of factors underlying PLOS in the NHL/HD cohort may provide the key to minimizing cost of autologous stem cell transplant. Accordingly, we are assessing the impact of age, number of pre-transplant treatment regimens, number of peripheral blood stem cells reinfused, use of IL-2 for post-transplant immune modulation, and the day 15 absolute lymphocyte count on LOS in this population.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1858-1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahma Warsame ◽  
Soo-Mee Bang ◽  
Shaji K. Kumar ◽  
Martha Q Lacy ◽  
Francis K Buadi ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1858 Systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) is a condition where clonal plasma cells produce misfolded insoluble immunoglobulin light chains that deposit in various organs causing progressive organ dysfunction. Chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) when eligible is the standard treatment options for patients with AL amyloidosis. There are several studies who report long term outcomes of patient post ASCT. However, there is a paucity of literature describing the outcomes of patients who have received ASCT but have relapsed. We performed a retrospective study to assess the outcomes and treatment regimens employed following relapse after ASCT. Between 1996 and 2009, 410 patients received ASCT at the Mayo Clinic as first line therapy. Of those 410 patients 42 patients died within 3 months of transplant, 64 patients died without documented relapse, 158 patients were alive without documented progression, and 146 patients had documented progression. Those 146 patients are the subject of our study. The median time to hematologic relapse was 2 years (range: 0.2–15.5 years). At relapse, 59 patients were treated with IMiD based therapy, 36 with alkylator based therapy, 24 with bortezomib, 15 with steroids, and 5 with second ASCT. The respective hematologic response rates were 58%, 33%, 50%, 53%, and 60%. The remaining six patients were not evaluable for response for one other following reasons: organ transplants; no further therapy; inevaluable disease. With a median post relapse follow up of 3.6 years, the median overall survival (OS) from the first post ASCT relapse was 4.6 years. The median post transplant follow up was 6.1 years, the median OS for these patients was 7.3 years from the time of transplant. These data provide novel information about outcomes after SCT relapse, which should be useful not only for patients and doctors but also for investigators designing studies for salvage therapies post-transplant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7511-7511 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Vose ◽  
F. Loberiza ◽  
P. Bierman ◽  
G. Bociek ◽  
J. Armitage

7511 Background: Although patients (pts) with MCL have a high response rate to standard chemotherapy, they continue to relapse with no plateau in long term disease-free survival. The use of dose intense induction therapy such as HyperCVAD (M-C) ±Rituximab(R) and high-dose therapy and stem cell may improve these results. In this analysis the outcomes of pts receiving a standard anthracycline induction therapy or HyperCVAD(M-C)(±R) then followed by a stem cell transplant in first complete (CR1) or partial remission (PR1) were compared. Methods: Between 6/91 and 11/05, 124 pts with MCL received high-dose chemotherapy and a stem cell transplant. Of these pts, 80 received an autologous stem cell transplant in CR1 (N = 47) or PR1 (N = 33). A standard anthracycline based CHOP-like (±R) induction therapy was given to 48 pts compared with 32 pts who received HyperCVAD(M-C)(±R) prior to transplant. Results: The median age of pts was 56 years (range 33–70). The male:female ratio was 33:57. Bone marrow involvement prior to conditioning was present in 52% of pts. An elevated lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) was present in 58% of pts. 65% of patients received one prior chemotherapy before coming to stem cell transplant. The median follow up of pts is 38 months (range 3–143). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are outlined in table 1 . Characteristics associated with an improved OS by multivariate analysis included receiving HyperCVAD induction (p = 0.04), transplant in CR1 (p = 0.009), ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy regimens (p = 0.02) and no B symptoms at transplant (p = 0.05). Conclusions: To improve the long term disease free survival for pts with MCL, Hyper-CVAD(M-C)(±R) induction should be given to eligible patients with autolgous stem cell transplantation in CR1. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. S162
Author(s):  
Amer Beitinjaneh ◽  
Beverly Turner ◽  
Leonid Volodin ◽  
Tamila L. Kindwall-Keller ◽  
Hannah E. Spencer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document