Outcomes of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Who Achieve Stable Disease after Treatment with Hypomethylating Agents (HMA)

Abstract Background The primary treatment goal in higher-risk MDS patients (pts) is to prolong survival by altering the natural history of the disease and delaying progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment with HMA such as azacitidine (AZA) improves overall survival (OS) in pts who achieve a response of stable disease (SD) or better (complete remission [CR], partial remission [PR], or hematologic improvement [HI]) (Gore et al, Haematologica, 2013). However, it is not well established if pts who achieve SD by 6 months (mo) of therapy should be offered different therapies to optimize their response or continue with the same HMA regimen. Methods Clinical data were obtained from the MDS Clinical Research Consortium database. Pts treated with either AZA or decitabine (DAC) were included and categorized per the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System. Responses were evaluated per International Working Group (IWG 2006) criteria. SD was defined as no evidence of progression and without achievement of HI. Early response was defined as achievement of CR, PR, HI, or SD between 3-6 months (mo) of therapy. Best response was assessed after 6 mo of treatment. OS was calculated from the start of therapy to date of death or last follow up. Differences were evaluated using the Fisher-exact test and Mann-Whitney U tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results Of 291 pts with higher-risk MDS and available response data, 248 (85%) received treatment with AZA and 43 (15%) with DAC. Median age was 70 years (range, 35-99), median absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 1.05 X109/L (range, .58-68), hemoglobin 9.3 g/dL (range, 3.7-14.3), platelets 73 X109/L (range, 4-659), and bone marrow blasts 10% (range, 0-19). Per IPSS-R, 20% of pts were intermediate risk, 37% high, and 43% very high. A total of 142 pts (49%) progressed to AML. Median time from diagnosis to start of HMA was 28 days. Early responses (3-6 mo) were: CR 10%, PR 5%, HI 10%, and SD 49%. Among the 144 pts who achieved SD at 3-6 mo, 29 (20%) achieved a better response (CR, PR, or HI) later during their treatment, with a median time to better response of 3.7 mo (range,1.2-14.5); 113 (89%) remained with stable disease, and 2 (1%) progressed to AML. With a median follow up of 16.5 mo (range, 2.5-120.2), the median OS by best response at any time point during therapy: CR 19.7 mo, PR 12.6 mo, HI 15.4 mo, and SD 13.8 mo. Pts who achieved CR had superior OS compared to SD (p=.03) but similar survival compared to pts who achieved PR (p=.45) or HI (p=.24). Of 29 pts with SD who achieved a better response > 6 mo, 16 (55%) achieved a CR and 13 (45%) achieved a PR or HI. Pts with SD who subsequently achieved CR had superior OS compared to pts who remained in SD (28.1 vs 14.4 mo, respectively, p=.04), while pts who subsequently achieved PR or HI had a similar survival compared to pts who remained in SD (12.1 vs 14.4 mo, respectively, p=.81). Conclusion Among MDS pts treated with HMAs, 20% who have SD at initial assessment go on to have a better response later in their treatment course, However, only 11% of SD pts achieved a CR thereafter, which predicted better OS. Thus, pts who achieve SD by 6 mo should be offered a clinical trial with novel agents to improve their chances of achieving CR. If a clinical trial is not available, pts should remain on HMA therapy until disease progression. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Prediction of Overall Survival in 520 Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis: Outcome Update of the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) Patient Cohort

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1729.1729 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1729-1729 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Margherita Maffioli ◽

Elisa Rumi ◽

Francisco Cervantes ◽

Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽

Enrica Morra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Scoring System ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽

Primary Myelofibrosis ◽

Outcome Data ◽

International Prognostic Scoring System ◽

Risk Category ◽

Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Abstract 1729 Background: Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm whose survival at diagnosis is predicted by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), which is based on the presence of the following five risk factors: age greater than 65 years, presence of constitutional symptoms, hemoglobin level below 10 g/dL, leukocyte count greater than 25 ×109/L, and circulating blast cells 1% or greater (Cervantes et al, Blood 2009). To allow dynamic prognostication at any time during follow up, we further developed the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS), based on the same IPSS-factors, but with different score values (one point for each risk factor, two points for acquisition of anemia) and with a distinct score model (low risk, LR, 0 points; intermediate-1 risk, Int-1R, 1–2 points; intermediate-2 risk, Int-2R, 3–4 points; high risk, HR, 5–6 points) (Passamonti et al, Blood 2010). The DIPSS model was also efficient in the prediction of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolution (Passamonti et al, Blood 2010) and in the assessment of survival and non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Scott et al, Blood 2012). Aim: The aim of the present study is to update outcome data of PMF patients included in the original series used to generate the DIPSS model and to assess the DIPSS prediction of survival in PMF patients with a longer follow up. The Institutional Review Board approved the study, and the procedures followed were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients and methods: This study was performed on 520 of 525 regularly followed DIPSS-PMF patients, as five patients have been lost to follow up after the original publication. Results: Updated median follow up was of 4.1 years (range, 0.1–30.1). At the time of analysis 326 (63%) patients died, of whom 194 due to known causes: 69 AML, 16 non-AML disease progression, 21 bleeding, 17 thrombosis, 33 infections, 38 other. Median survival was 6 years (95% CI: 5.1–6.7). DIPSS stratification allowed different survivals in PMF patients even with a longer follow-up (Figure 1). Hence, to assess the time to DIPSS-category progression, we evaluated the median time spent within each risk group. This estimate revealed that the median time spent in each risk category was: 4.9 years in LR (range, 0–26.7), 2.1 years in Int-1R (range, 0–18.7), 1.7 years in Int-2R (range, 0–13.4), and 0.74 years in HR (range, 0–13.7). To investigate the prognostic role of the DIPSS score on survival, we analyzed the score as a categorical time-dependent covariate in a Cox survival regression model: the hazard ratio of shifting category from LR to Int-1R was 5.0 (95% CI: 2.4–10.6; P <0.001), it was 3.6 when shifting from Int-1R to Int-2R (95% CI: 2.6–4.9; P <0.001), and 2.7 (95% CI: 2.0–3.6; P <0.001) from Int-2R to HR. Conclusion: The updated analysis shows that the DIPSS model continues to predict survival in patients with PMF. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

The Combination of Azacitidine (AZA) and Recombinant Erythropoietin (rEPO) Can Induce Rapidly Hematological Response In Intermediate-2 and High-risk MDS (including RAEB-t)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2914.2914 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2914-2914

Author(s):

Haris Kartsios ◽

Kostas Loukidis ◽

Vassilios Papadopoulos ◽

Smaragda Effraimidou ◽

Anastasia Spyrou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Laboratory Data ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Recombinant Erythropoietin ◽

Platelet Response ◽

Erythroid Response ◽

Best Response ◽

Neutrophil Response

Abstract Abstract 2914 Background: AZA, a DNA hypomethylating agent, provides 50–60% responses in higher-risk MDS after administration of 6 courses of treatment. Recent laboratory data suggests that demethylation with AZA upregulates EPO-receptor mRNA (Wallach, 2009). AZA might also affect several genes involved in cell cycle, metabolism and signal transduction which are down-regulated in bone marrow erythroid cells in MDS patients non-responsive to rEPO. There is currently insufficient data to combine AZA and rEPO in MDS patients. Patients-Methods: We explored the safety and the efficacy of the AZA-rEPO combination in a cohort of 10 (M/F: 5/5) patients (pts) with a median age of 75(67-83) years. Diagnosis (WHO classification) was: RAEB-2: 5, CMML: 2 and RAEB-t: 3; IPSS was: int-2 in 8/10 and high in 2/10 pts. Median time from diagnosis was 6(1-31) months. 9/10 pts were transfusion dependent, 8/10 were refractory to previous rEPO administration while 2/10 pts were not treated with rEPO but their diagnostic serum EPO levels were >200 U/L. Patients were given AZA at FDA/EMEA-approved schedule (75 mg/m2/d x7d/4-weekly) initially for 5 courses and continued if response was obtained. rEPO (40,000IU/week) was given until achievement of steady Hb level >10.5 g/dL or until AZA discontinuation. Results: Median follow-up was 6.5(1-14) months. Patients received a median of 5 cycles (range 2–13) of AZA; 9/10 pts were treated with ≥5 courses of AZA. The median time of rEPO administration was 82(76-142) days. Best response (IWG 2006 criteria) was CR in 1/10 pts (RAEB-2: 1), marrow CR in 1/10 pts (RAEB-t: 1), and stable disease with hematological improvement (HI) in 4/10 pts (RAEB-t: 1, RAEB-2: 2, CMML: 1) leading to an overall response rate of 60%. As soon as 2 courses of AZA-rEPO were given, 5/6 responders experienced HI-erythroid response, 3/6 obtained HI-platelet response and 2/6 achieved HI-neutrophil response. Adverse events included 2 episodes of febrile neutropenia, nausea (2/10 pts), reversible renal impairment (2/10 pts) and hemorrhagic complications (3/10 patients). Currently, 9/10 patients remain alive, 1 patient experienced progression to AML and the estimated probability of 1 year-Progression Free Survival is 75%. Conclusions: This study provides clinical evidence that the AZA-rEPO combination is safe and rapidly effective in higher risk MDS pts. Our results emphasize the necessity for randomized trials in order to further evaluate the AZA-rEPO combination in MDS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Low-Dose Weekly Decitabine and Venetoclax in TP53-Mutated Myeloid Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145960 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4428-4428

Author(s):

Lauren C Shapiro ◽

Ioannis Mantzaris ◽

Aditi Shastri ◽

R. Alejandro Sica ◽

Lizamarie Bachier-Rodriguez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

High Risk ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

De Novo ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Best Response ◽

Previous Clinical Trial

Abstract Decitabine (Dec) and Azacitidine (Aza) that target DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) are hypomethylating agents (HMAs) approved to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in combination with Venetoclax (Ven). The combination is also used to treat high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, especially TP53-mutated (TP53mut) cases in which responses to HMA alone are short-lived. In most patients (pts), however, myelosuppression from treatment leads to frequent Ven duration and/or dose-reductions, and/or cycle delays. An approach to decrease HMA-mediated myelosuppression but maintain S-phase dependent DNMT1-targeting, evaluated in a previous clinical trial (https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16281), is to administer noncytotoxic doses/concentrations of Dec (0.2 mg/kg; ~5 mg/m 2) by a frequent-distributed schedule of 1X/week. An approach to decrease Ven mediated myelosuppression but maintain cooperation with HMA, shown in pre-clinical studies, is to administer a single-dose prior to HMA. Ven can depolarize mitochondrial membranes; mitochondrial membrane-potential is essential to function of the mitochondrial enzyme DHODH that produces cytidine/deoxycytidine that competes with HMA in cells. Thus, Ven prior to HMA dosing temporarily inhibits de novo pyrimidine synthesis, to counter a major mechanism of resistance to HMA in MDS/AML, without suppressing normal myelopoiesis (https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-143200). We conducted a retrospective analysis of all pts with TP53mut MDS or AML treated with weekly Ven and low-dose subcutaneous Dec at our institution. We analyzed the characteristics of these pts, response to therapy, and outcomes using standard descriptive statistics. Mutational testing was performed using a commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Five pts, 3 male and 2 female, with TP53mut MDS or AML were treated with weekly Ven 400 mg on D1 and subcutaneous Dec 0.2 mg/kg on D2, administered weekly in 28 day cycles. Two pts had MDS (1 de novo, 1 treatment related) and 3 pts had AML (1 de novo, 2 secondary from prior MDS). Four pts (80%) received the treatment in frontline, all with poor performance status (PS), and 1 pt (20%) had R/R disease. Median age at diagnosis was 79 years [41-82]. The only young pt had prolonged severe cytopenias after 1 cycle Dec standard dosing during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic so was switched to this regimen. Of the 4 frontline treated pts, 2 pts had high-risk MDS, and 2 pts had adverse risk AML. The R/R pt had high-risk MDS transformed to AML that was refractory to 2 prior lines of therapy: standard Aza/Ven x5 cycles, then standard Vyxeos. Disease cytogenetics were complex in all pts. 60% (3/5) pts had sole TP53mut on NGS, with median variant allelic frequency (VAF) 48% [28-79]. 80% (4/5) pts were transfusion dependent prior to treatment. Median time to initiating therapy was 7 days from initial or refractory diagnosis [3-59] and median follow-up was 7.8 months (mo) [2.9-11.4]. The overall response rate (ORR) was 100%: 4/4 frontline pts had complete remissions (CR), and the 1 R/R pt achieved morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS). Median time to best response was 2.9 mo. 50% (2/4) pts became transfusion independent. 40% (2/5) pts lost their TP53mut at best response, and another 40% (2/5) pts had significant reductions (83% and 38%) in TP53 mut VAF. The regimen was well tolerated with no pts stopping therapy due to adverse effects (AE) . AE included G3/G4 neutropenia (80%), G1 thrombocytopenia (40%), nausea (20%), fatigue (20%), lower extremity edema (20%), pneumonia (60%), and neutropenic fever (20%) with a median of 1 unplanned hospitalization per pt during follow-up. 60% (3/5) pts remain in CR on continued therapy for a median of 7.8 mo [7.2-9.4] thus far. One pt underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation, however, died 11.4 mo after conditioning due to transplant related mortality. The R/R pt died after being lost to follow-up 2.9 mo after therapy initiation. No pt had measurable relapse during follow-up. Combination weekly Ven with subcutaneous low-dose Dec is well tolerated yielding high rates of clinical and molecular response in pts with TP53mut MDS/AML. Although small, this case-series extends previous clinical trial proof-of-activity of non-cytotoxic DNMT1-targeting to a high-risk, poor PS, historically chemorefractory patient population. The regimen allowed frequent, sustained exposure to therapy often not possible with standard HMA/Ven regimens. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Shastri: Kymera Therapeutics: Research Funding; Guidepoint: Consultancy; GLC: Consultancy; Onclive: Honoraria. Gritsman: iOnctura: Research Funding. Feldman: Glycomimetics: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Verma: Celgene: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Stelexis: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Medpacto: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Stelexis: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Throws Exception: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Saunthararajah: EpiDestiny: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.

Download Full-text

Durability of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) after treatment cessation.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.9543 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 9543-9543

Author(s):

Alison Margaret Weppler ◽

Laetitia Da Meda ◽

Ines Silva ◽

Wen Xu ◽

Giovanni Grignani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Initial Response ◽

Leptomeningeal Disease ◽

Treatment Cessation ◽

Cns Involvement ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Disease Characteristics ◽

Best Response

9543 Background: mMCC is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine cancer which often occurs in older patients (pts) with multiple comorbidities. While initial response rates to ICI are high, optimal treatment duration, durability of response after treatment cessation and response to retreatment with ICI is unknown. Methods: mMCC pts from 12 international centres who received at least one dose of ICI and subsequently stopped treatment without progression for a minimum of 12 weeks were studied. Demographics, disease characteristics and treatment course were examined. Results: 40 pts with mMCC were included. Pt characteristics are summarised in Table. Median time on treatment was 13.5 months (range 1 to 35). Median time to best response was 4.5 months (range 1 to 17) and median time receiving treatment after best response was 8 months (range 0 to 29). 25 pts (63%) stopped primarily due to being in a complete or partial response (CR or PR), 9 (23%) due to toxicity and 6 (15%) due to other reasons, primarily pt choice or comorbidities. At time of discontinuation, 30 pts (75%) were in a CR, 8 (20%) in a PR and 2 pts (5%) had stable disease (SD). After a median follow up of 12 months from discontinuation, 14 pts (35%) have progressed (PD); 5 (36%) at a previous site, 5 (36%) at a new site and 4 (29%) at both. PD occurred after a median of 5.5 months (range 4 to 29) off treatment. 4 pts (29%) had a CNS recurrence, none of whom previously had CNS involvement. Pts in CR at time of discontinuation were less likely to progress (CR: 26% PD vs non-CR: 67% PD, p=0.044), but still had a considerable rate of PD (CR: 26%, PR: 57%, SD: 100%). Those who progressed had numerically less cycles of ICI prior to treatment cessation (17 vs 32, p>0.05). Baseline disease factors, time to best response and duration of treatment after best response were not associated with PD. ICI was restarted in 8 of 14 pts (57%) with PD, with response rate to retreatment of 75% (4 CR, 2 PR, 1 SD, 1 PD – pt with leptomeningeal disease). Median time to best response at retreatment was 3 months (range 2 to 7), with all responses ongoing after a median of 10 months back on treatment. 3 pts had an isolated site of PD successfully treated with radiation therapy and remain in remission off ICI. Conclusions: ICI responses in mMCC do not appear as durable off treatment as in other cancers, including in patients who achieve a CR. Ongoing treatment should be considered, though initial data on response to retreatment is promising.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) in Patients with Haematological Lymphoid Malignancies: Long Term Follow-up in a Single Centre Series.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.4326.4326 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 4326-4326

Author(s):

Malek Benakli ◽

Redhouane Ahmed nacer ◽

Amina Talbi ◽

Rachida Belhadj ◽

Farih Mehdid ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Complete Remission ◽

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Median Time ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Late Onset ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Lymphoid Leukaemia ◽

Autologous Transplant

Abstract Abstract 4326 Background Patients (pts) with recurrent and refractory haematological lymphoid malignancy (HLM) have a very limited survival expectance. RIC allo-SCT has been proposed as a strategy for retaining the graft versus malignancy effect of allo-SCT while decreasing transplant related mortality (TRM). Here, we retrospectively studied a series of 32 pts treated by RIC allo-SCT. Patients and methods Between April 2001 and November 2007, 32 pts with HLM underwent RIC allo-SCT with an HLA-identical sibling donor. Fifteen pts with multiple myeloma, 7 pts with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 6 pts with Chronic lymphoid leukaemia, 3 pts with Hodgkin lymphoma and 1 pt with Waldenstrom disease. At time of allo-SCT, 10 pts were in complete remission (3 received prior autologous transplant) and 22 in refractory/progressive disease (6 received prior autologous transplant). Median age was 38 years (range, 28-60) and the sex-ratio (M/F) 2,2. Median time from diagnosis to RIC allo-SCT was 18 (range,6-76) months. The conditioning regimen included Fludarabine 150mg/m2 and Melphalan 140mg/m2. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of association cyclosporine (cSA) and mycophenolate (MMF). All pts received G-CSF mobilised peripheral blood stem cells, with a median CD34+ cell count: 6,2.106/kg (range, 1.9-13,6). Results Neutropenia occurred in all pts (100%) and the median duration of aplasia was 9 (range, 5-16) days. Only 10 pts (31 %) required red blood cells transfusions and 23 pts (71 %) needed platelets transfusions. Acute GVHD was observed in 15 cases (47 %) including 10 cases of grade II-IV. Fifteen pts (75 %) had chronic GVHD, of whom 9 with an extensive form. Four pts (12 %) had CMV reactivation at a median time 60 (range, 52-80) days after transplantation. Six pts (18 %) had late onset relapse at a median time of 13 (range, 4-45) months. TRM was 43 % at one year after RIC allo-SCT. With a median follow-up of 60 (range 18-97) months, 12 pts (37,5 %) are still alive in complete remission with full donor chimerism. Twenty pts (62,5 %) have died (5 early severe infections, 10 GVHD, 3 after relapse, one myocardial infarction, and one accident). Overall and progression-free survivals at 8 years are 31 % and 30 % respectively. Conclusion This study, after a large follow-up, suggests that RIC allo-SCT is a potential therapy for refractory or progressive HLM. However, TRM is still high likely due to the inclusion of refractory and heavily pretreated pts with many comorbid conditions. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Lenalidomide-Based Regimens in Multiple Myeloma Complicated by Extramedullary Plasmacytomas at Relapse or Progression.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.4952.4952 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 4952-4952 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jose Manuel Calvo-Villas ◽

Adrian Alegre ◽

Ricarda García-Sánchez ◽

Miguel T Hernández ◽

Pilar Giraldo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Median Time ◽

Light Chain ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Bone Lesions ◽

Complete Disappearance ◽

Toxicity Profile ◽

Small Series ◽

Extramedullary Plasmacytomas

Abstract Abstract 4952 Background Current clinical observations on extramedullary myeloma (EM) are based on small series of relapsed myeloma patients (pts) and, in this situation, results suggest that the disease course is often aggressive. Among novel therapies for extramedullary involvement, thalidomide has provided poor results and bortezomib is emerging as a possible useful drug. The role of lenalidomide for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) with EM is still under investigation. Aim A multicenter retrospective study was performed by PETHEMA (Spanish Myeloma Group, Spain) to evaluate the response rate and toxicity profile of lenalidomide-based regimens in myeloma patients with extramedullary involvement at relapse or progression. All the cases were evaluated for response of MM and improvement of extramedullary plasmacytoma. Patients and Methods From October 2007 to March 2009, thirteen patients (median age 67 years; range 61–87; 7 females) treated with lenalidomide-containing regimens were recorded. Patients with bone disease without extramedullary manifestations were excluded. Response of MM was evaluated according to the new international criteria and the response of EM by measuring size changes by physical examination, CT scans and/or MR imaging. Adverse events were graded based on the WHO toxicity scale. The M-protein type was IgG in 7 cases, IgA in 5 and light chain in 1. The type of light chain was κ in 7 pts and l in 6. In eight patients the soft-tissue plasmacytomas may have developed from underlying bone lesions [(skull (n=2), rib cage (n=4) and paravertebral (n=2)], two patients had subcutaneous nodules and three had visceral involvement (liver (n=1), lung and kidney (n=1) and pleura (n=1). Multiple localizations were present in 4 pts (30.7%). Six cases (79.6%) received previous antimyeloma treatment for EM before lenalidomide therapy and the incidence of prior bone plasmacytomas was 61.5%. Median time from initial antimyeloma therapy to treatment with lenalidomide was 34 months (range 5 - 115). Median number of prior lines of chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range 1 – 4), including autologous stem cell transplantation in 2 pts, bortezomib-containing regimens in 12 (92.3%) and previous exposure to thalidomide in 1 patient. Ten pts received standard lenalidomide dose (25 mg/day every 4 weeks) plus dexamethasone (40 mg/d PO ranging from 1 to 12 doses/cycle) every 3-week; and three patients received lower doses of lenalidomide and/or different schedules. Involved-field radiotherapy was given in 2 cases. Thirty percent of patients required lenalidomide dose reduction, because of toxicity or intolerance. Results Median duration of lenalidomide treatment was 3.6 months (1 – 15). One case was not evaluable for response because of death from disease progression after one cycle. In nine out of twelve evaluable patients (75%), MM responded to lenalidomide regimens according to EBMT criteria. Three (25%) achieved complete response, five (41.6%) partial response and 1 (8.3%) minimal response. Median time to response was 63 days (range 37 – 180). Regarding EM, nine patients showed response in the size of extramedullary plasmacytomas. Seven (58.3%) achieved complete disappearance of EM and two pts reduction of the size. Response of EM was also achieved in 75% of pts previously exposed to bortezomib, and in 4/9 cases who received therapies for prior extramedullary involvement. Median follow-up period was 6.3 months (1 – 15.8). Median overall survival from the start of lenalidomide therapy was 4.7 months. At the time of analysis, seven patients were still on therapy, and ten (76.9%) were alive. Only one out of the 9 patients who had achieved a response has relapsed so far. Toxicity profile (grade 3/4) was: thrombocytopenia, 4 (30.7%); anemia, 2 (15.3%); neutropenia, 5 (46.4%); neutropenic fever, 1 (7.6%) and others, 3 (11.8%). No deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was reported. Thrombosis prophylaxis was used in most cases (92%) patients. Conclusions We report one of the first investigations specifically evaluating the activity of lenalidomide on EM. Lenalidomide-containing regimens could be an alternative promising approach to achieve clinical response in heavily treated MM patients with extramedullary disease. The duration of response and the best regimen or combination are at present unknown. These preliminary observations require further analysis and longer follow-up. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Patients with CML Treated with Dasatinib or Nilotinib after Failure of Second Prior TKIs

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2294.2294 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2294-2294

Author(s):

Antonella Russo Rossi ◽

Massimo Breccia ◽

Fausto Castagnetti ◽

Luigiana Luciano ◽

Antonella Gozzini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Cell Uptake ◽

Second Line ◽

The Third ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Third Line ◽

New Mutations

Abstract Abstract 2294 Background. The TKIs Nilotinib and Dasatinib offer additional therapeutic options for patients with CML who are resistant or intolerant to Imatinib. These agents, active against the majority of Imatinib resistant BCR-ABL mutated clones, have a different pattern of kinase target selectivity, pharmacokinetics parameters, cell uptake, efflux properties and adverse events profiles. Preliminary results suggest that some patients may respond to a second TKI used as third line therapy, but little is known about the long term benefit of such an approach.Aim of this collaborative Italian study was to verify the response (rate and duration) and the clinical outcome in patients with CML treated with a third TKI after sequential failure of the previous ones. Methods. We evaluated 66 patients with CML, resistant/intolerant to Imatinib and treated with Dasatinib or Nilotinib, then switched to a third- line TKI after treatment failure. Of these, 29 patients were treated with dasatinib after imatinib/nilotinib failure and 37 with nilotinib after imatinib/dasatinib failure. Patients were monitored with complete blood counts, cytogenetic analysis, bone marrow aspiration RT-PCR and mutational analysis. Results. A total of 66 patients (median age 63 years, range, 33–85 years) were treated with sequential TKIs; 40 (61%) patients had received interferon-a before starting Imatinib; 26 (39%) patients received imatinib as first line therapy. The median time on imatinib therapy was 47.5 months (range 4–101 months). At the start of nilotinib as second line, 27/29 (93%) patients were in CP, 1 (3.5%) in AP, and 1 (3.5%) in BP. 9 patients (31%) had developed mutations before starting treatment. The median time on second line TKI was 8 months (range 2–36 months). In the resistant patients 4 new mutations were identified (F359V in two patients, T315I, Y253H+F359V). At the start of dasatinib as second line, 33/37 (89.2%) patients were in CP, 4 (10.8%) in AP. 7 patients (18.9%) had developed mutations before starting treatment. The median time on second line TKI was 14 months (range 4–59 months).In the resistant patients 5 new mutations were identified (F137L in three pts, M318T, M244V+F317L). At the start of the third TKI, 60/66 (90.9%) patients were in CP, 5 (7.6%) in AP, and 1 (1.5%) in BP. Of these, 7 patients (18.9%) on dasatinib and 7 (24.1%) on nilotinib had mutations before starting treatment. The best response to the third line treatment with TKI was 10 (15.2%) MMR, 10 (15.2%) CCyR, 8 PcyR (12.1%), 5 (7.5%) mCyR, 24 (36.4%) CHR and 9 (13.6%) No Response (NR). In the dasatinib group, 9 (31%) patients discontinued treatment because of toxicity versus 17 (45.9%) patients in the nilotinib group.Two new mutations (F317L, E255V) emerged with dasatinib as third line therapy.After a median follow up of 13 months (range 2–37 months) 50 patients (48 CP, 2 AP) are continuing therapy (33 on nilotinib, 17 on dasatinib).Since the start of the third TKI, 61 patients (92.4%) are still alive for a median overall survival of 110 months (range 15–300) (52 CP, 7 AP, 2 NA); the 5 deaths (7.6%) were caused by disease progression and spread of the gene mutation T315I. Discussion. In our study, about one third of patients derived benefit from the use of three sequential TKIs; patients with better, longer response (28.7%) to third TKI were the same patients with a better response to the Imatinib and 2TKIs therapy. All these patients had taken interferon therapy before the Imatinib. In this subset of patients (good responders: CCyR and MMR) 5 patients developed mutations that were sensitive to the sequential treatment.The lack of a durable cytogenetic remission could be explained by the emergence of new kinase domain mutations as patients are exposed to sequential TKI; a change of therapy resulted in an adequate response. In our series, patients with poor prognosis showed mutations not sensitive to the TKIs treatment. Conclusions. Although allogeneic SCT is the treatment of choice in all patients failing 2 TKIs who are suitable candidates for this approach, alternative strategies are required for ineligible patients. The use of a third TKI after failure of two previous TKIs induces response in some patients. Longer follow up of a larger series of patients is needed to determine the long term impact of the response. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Rituximab In Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Fludarabine + Total Body Irradiation Conditioning: Results of a Phase II Prospective Multicenter Study (ITAC 02-02)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3520.3520 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3520-3520

Author(s):

Mauricette Michallet ◽

Mohamad Sobh ◽

Stephane Morisset ◽

Mohamad Mohty ◽

Gerard Socie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Total Body Irradiation ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Positive Trend ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Total Body

Abstract Abstract 3520 Background: CLL remains incurable with standard therapies. Myeloablative allogeneic SCT (allo-HSCT) is still associated with high TRM and few late relapses. Recently, the major focus of transplantation in CLL has been with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HSCT, which is applicable to the more elderly patient population and which attempts to exploit the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect that was proved in CLL Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity a RIC regimen including fludarabine and total body irradiation (TBI) with the introduction of rituximab for allo-HSCT in patients with a CLL stage B or C diagnosis. Materials and methods: This prospective study included adult CLL patients with age < 65 years in stage B or C in response after a salvage treatment either following at least 2 treatment lines (1 including fludarabine) or after a progressive disease after auto-HSCT, having a HLA identical sibling donor and a good performance status (Karnfosky >70%). Donors were mobilized by G-CSF and in case of collection failure, bone marrow aspiration was authorized. The conditioning included: rituximab 375mg/m2 on day -5, fludarabine 30 mg/m2 from day-4 to day-2, TBI 2grays (6-7 cGrays/minute) on day 0 and rituximab 500mg/m2 on day1 and day8. GVHD prophylaxis used cyclosporine A (IV 3mg/kg/day) from day-2 and mycomofetil fenolate oral (2g/day) from day 1. Results: Between April 2003 and December 2008, 40 patients were included, 34 (85%) males and 6 females with a median age of 54 years (35-65), 38 (95%) were in B stage at diagnosis and 2 in stage C. Among 23 explored for cytogenetics, 8 were abnormal (3 del17, 1 trisomy12, 1 t(8-11) & 1 del13). Before transplantation, 17 patients received 2 lines treatment, 10 three lines, 5 four lines, and 8>4. Only 1 patient received a previous auto-HSCT. Among 18 explored for Matutes status, 1 was in score 1, 1 in score 2, 3 in score 3, 5 in score 4 & 9 in score 5. At time of allograft, 7 (17%) patients were in complete response (CR), 29 (73%) in partial response (PR) and 4 (10%) < PR. For sex-matching, 59% were mismatched (27%of them were F>M). For ABO matching, 68% were compatible, 19% major incomp. & 13% minor incopm. The median interval diagnosis-allo-HSCT was 58 months (6-177). Median CD34+ number was 7.64 (3.1-18.7). Seven (17%) patients did not receive rituximab during conditioning because the protocol did not include it at the beginning and has been amended later. Thirty-nine (98%) patients engrafted with a median time to neutrophils recovery of 20 days (11-70), 79% of patients reached a total donor chimerism at day 90. Seventeen patients developed aGVHD grade ≥II (8 grII, 8 grIII & 1 grIV) with a cumulative incidence at 3 months of 44% (36-52). The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was, at 12 months: 29% (21-36) for limited and extensive; at 18 months: 32% (24-40) limited and 42% (34-50) extensive. After a median follow-up of 28 months (3-71), the median OS was not reached with 3 and 5-years probability of 55%(41-74). The median time of EFS was 30 months (15 - 70) with a 5-years probability of 46%(33-66). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 and 3 years was 17% (11-23) and 22% (15-29) respectively. The cumulative incidence TRM at 1 and 3 years was 10% (5-15) and 27% (20-35) respectively. At the last follow-up, 17 patients died, 6 due to relapse and 11 due to TRM. We noticed a high severe infection rate (56%) and 4% of deaths related only to infection. The univariate analysis showed a positive trend of rituximab on OS and relapse, and a significant protective effect on aGVHD>=2 (p=0.02). The multivariate analysis studying age, interval diagnosis-allo-HSCT, ABO and sex matching, disease status at allo-HSCT, CD34+ number, and rituximab, showed a positive significant impact of this last factor (rituximab) on OS and EFS [HR=0.1 [0-0.6] p=0.02 & HR=0.1[0-0.4] p=0.035 respectively]. Conclusion: We showed interesting results in terms of OS, relapse and TRM in patients with advanced CLL after Fludarabine/TBI allo-HSCT. The introduction of rituximab allowed a better outcome especially a significant reduction of incidence and severity of acute GVHD. Nevertheless there was still a high incidence of cGVHD, already known following the Fludarabine/TBI conditioning, leading us to propose either to increase the number of rituximab injections after allo-HSCT, or to test Fludarabine/busilvex/ATG associated to rituximab. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Single agent ONC201 in adult recurrent H3 K27M-mutant glioma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.3005 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 3005-3005

Author(s):

Isabel Arrillaga ◽

Sylvia Kurz ◽

Ashley Sumrall ◽

Nicholas A. Butowski ◽

Rebecca A. Harrison ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stable Disease ◽

Poor Prognosis ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Tumor Regression ◽

Single Agent ◽

Complete Regression ◽

Compassionate Use ◽

Best Response ◽

Clinical Trial Information

3005 Background: H3 K27M-mutant glioma is associated with a poor prognosis and there is no effective therapy following radiation. We report the clinical experience with single agent ONC201, the first small molecule DRD2 antagonist in oncology, in adults with recurrent H3 K27M-mutant glioma. Methods: Twenty-nine adult patients with recurrent H3 K27M-mutant glioma have been treated with single agent ONC201 as of January 20, 2019: 19 patients on NCT03295396; 8 patients on NCT02525692; 2 patients on compassionate use protocols under the Sponsor’s IND. Median age was 57 years old (range: 17-74), median prior lines of therapy was 2 (range: 1-4) and all patients received prior radiation (median 8.5 months from radiation completion to ONC201 initiation). ONC201 was orally administered at 625 mg weekly, except for one patient dosed once every 3 weeks. Results: As of February 5, 2019, 13 of 29 patients remain on-trial within median follow up of 6.5 months (range: 0.6-33.6), 8 patients are alive but off-trial with median follow up of 2.4 months (range: 0.2-9), and 8 patients have expired. Nine of 29 patients (31%) remain progression-free on ONC201 with a median follow up of 6.5 months (range 0.6-33.6). No dose-limiting toxicities or treatment discontinuations due to toxicity occurred. Three patients have experienced durable partial responses by RANO (4.3-28.5 months). In addition, one patient experienced complete regression that continues for > 14 months of all < 1 cm tumor lesions that are not measurable by RANO. Furthermore, 10 patients had a best response of stable disease by RANO, 12 patients experienced progressive disease, and 3 patients are not yet evaluable. Among the patients with a best response of stable disease by RANO, one patient had > 50% tumor regression in the basal ganglia that did not qualify as a partial response by RANO due to a new lesion on a confirmatory scan. Another patient with stable disease by RANO has had 37% tumor regression so far in the brainstem and remains on-treatment for 6 months. All tumor regressions remain durable to date and some were associated with improvements in disease-associated neurological symptoms. Conclusions: Single agent ONC201 is well tolerated and clinically active in adult recurrent H3 K27M-mutant glioma patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03295396; NCT02525692.

Download Full-text

Omalizumab: Efficacy and Safety in Mast Cell Disorders

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114739 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4280-4280

Author(s):

Richard Lemal ◽

Guillemette Fouquet ◽

Louis Terriou ◽

Mélanie Vaes ◽

Cristina Livideanu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mast Cell ◽

Median Time ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Complete Response ◽

Effective Treatment Option ◽

Best Response ◽

Cell Disorder

Abstract Background. Patients with mast cell diseases may suffer from various distressing symptoms, which can be insufficiently controlled with available therapies, severely affecting quality of life. There is thus a need for new and safe treatment options for these patients. Objectives. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of omalizumab administration in patients with a systemic mast cell disorder. Methods. We included 56 patients with a systemic mast cell disorder who received omalizumab treatment between January 2015 and December 2017, after a pluridisciplinary review at the French National Reference Center for Mastocytosis (CEREMAST). Results. A complete response was achieved for 1 patient (1.8%), a major response for 30 patients (53.6%) and a partial response for 12 patients (21.4%), resulting in an overall response rate of 76.8% (43/56 patients). The response was persistent at least 3 months in 33 patients (58.9%). Median time to first response was 2 months and median time to best response was 6 months. Omalizumab was dramatically effective on all superficial and general vasomotor symptoms and on most gastrointestinal or urinary symptoms, and partially effective on most neuropsychiatric symptoms (Figure 1). Safety profile was acceptable, except for one severe adverse event (cervical edema and dyspnea after the first injection of omalizumab). Side effects were reported in 16 patients (28.6%), mainly of low to mild intensity, yet causing interruption of treatment in 6 patients (10.7%). Conclusion. Omalizumab is an effective treatment option in systemic mast cell disorders, and displays a favorable safety profile. Prospective studies remain necessary to confirm these encouraging results. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text