scholarly journals Disease Characteristics, Patterns of Care, and Survival in Very Elderly Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4480-4480
Author(s):  
Jessica N. Williams ◽  
Ashish Rai ◽  
Joseph Lipscomb ◽  
Jean L. Koff ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Very Elderly ◽  
Selection Factors ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Context: Despite having the highest incidence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), individuals older than 80 years are rarely included in DLBCL clinical trials or epidemiological studies. We sought to better characterize DLBCL presentation, treatment, and survival patterns for this age group. Objective: We investigated demographic and clinical characteristics at diagnosis, treatment selection factors, and the impact of treatment regimen on overall survival (OS) and lymphoma-related survival (LRS) for DLBCL patients >80 years. We hypothesized that patients >80 years were more likely to undergo observation and less likely to receive standard-of-care rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). We also hypothesized that patients >80 years who received R-CHOP would have superior OS and LRS, even after controlling for demographic and clinical factors. Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database to examine DLBCL patients diagnosed from 1999-2009 and followed through 2010. Our population-based cohort contained 5,924 DLBCL patients aged ≥66 years; 1,422 were >80 years. Only patients treated within 6 months of diagnosis with R-CHOP; cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP); cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP); rituximab plus CVP (R-CVP); or patients undergoing observation were included in order to examine factors associated with the use of anthracyclines. Chi-squared tests compared characteristics and initial treatments of DLBCL patients >80 years and 66-80 years. Multivariable logistic regression models examined treatment selection factors in patients >80 years. Standard and propensity score-adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, performance status, and year of diagnosis examined relationships between treatment regimen, treatment duration, and survival. Results: Among patients >80 years, 58% were female, 91% were Caucasian, 36% had stage III/IV disease, 39% had extranodal involvement, 7% had B-symptoms, 28% had poor performance status, and 14% had ≥2 comorbidities. Patients >80 years were less likely to receive R-CHOP (43% vs. 61%) and more likely to be observed (30% vs. 15%) or receive R-CVP (12% vs. 4%); all p<0.0001. Sex, marital status, area-level poverty, year of diagnosis, performance status, and disease site were associated with R-CHOP treatment in patients >80 years. The initial receipt of R-CHOP was more commonly associated with female sex (odds ratio (OR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.71), being married (OR 1.69, 1.07-2.66) and a diagnosis after 2001 (OR for 2002 11.71, 6.32-21.70; persistently increased ORs thereafter). The initial receipt of R-CHOP was less commonly associated with extranodal disease (OR 0.71, 0.55-0.91), poor performance status (OR 0.57, 0.44-0.75), and residence in a census tract with >12% of residents living in poverty (OR 0.69, 0.50-0.96). Initial observation was more commonly associated with the same factors that were less commonly associated with R-CHOP use and was less commonly associated with stage III/IV disease (OR 0.66, 0.50-0.87). Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that in patients >80 years, R-CHOP was associated with the best OS and LRS. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models revealed that R-CHOP for >4 cycles was associated with the best OS in patients >80 years of all stages (hazard ratio (HR) 0.48, 0.37-0.62). Among stage III/IV patients, R-CHOP for >4 cycles (HR 0.48, 0.31-0.72) and R-CVP for >4 cycles (HR 0.40, 0.21-0.76) demonstrated significantly longer OS. Conclusions:Although DLBCL patients >80 years were less likely to receive R-CHOP, this regimen conferred the best survival. The failure of very elderly DLBCL patients to receive R-CHOP may occur due to clinical factors such as poor performance status, but commonly varies across demographic factors such as area-level poverty, which may reflect bias in the under-utilization of R-CHOP in very elderly patients that is not based on clinical parameters. Further studies are needed to characterize the impact of DLBCL treatment on quality of life in very elderly patients, and algorithms should be developed to help guide therapy in this population. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for Elderly Patients (≥ 60 Years) with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL): An Analysis Based on EBMT Registry.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1888-1888
Author(s):  
Esa Jantunen ◽  
Carmen Canals ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
Alessandro Rambaldi ◽  
Herve Tilly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Stem Cell Source ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Limited data is available on feasibility and efficacy of ASCT in elderly patients with NHL. Patients: In 2000–2005 15869 NHL patients with ASCT were reported to EBMT database, 3133 (20%) were ≥ 60 years. Only patients with MED-B dataset and those with either diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell (MCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL) were subjected to more detailed analysis. This group included 906 elderly NHL patients (median age 63 years, range 60–75) (DLBCL, n = 463; MCL, n = 208; FL, n = 235) who were compared with 3661 patients &lt; 60 years (DLBCL, n = 2149; MCL, n = 435; FL, n = 1077) regarding outcome. Bulky disease was more common in younger patients (26% vs. 15%, p &lt; 0.001) as well as B-symptoms at diagnosis (42% vs. 36%, p = 0.02). Elderly patients had received more often at least two treatment lines before ASCT (70% vs. 59%, p&lt;0.001). The median follow-up for the surviving patients was 14 months. Results: Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was higher in patients ≥ 60 years of age: 3.8% vs.2.3% at 100 days, 6.9% vs. 3.9% at 1 year and 9.4% vs. 5.8% at 3 years (p&lt;0.001). No differences in NRM were observed between patients aged 60–64 years (n = 633) and those aged 65–69 (n = 240). A higher NRM was observed in DLBCL and MCL patients compared to FL patients (p=0.001and p=0.002, respectively). Other variables associated with a higher NRM were an elevated LDH at diagnosis (p=0.04), ≥ 2 treatment lines before ASCT (p&lt;0.001); a poor performance status at ASCT (p&lt;0.001); not being in CR1 at ASCT (chemosensitive disease vs. CR1, p=0.02; chemorefractory disease vs. CR1, p&lt;0.001) and BM as stem cell source (p=0.02). In multivariate analysis, elderly patients showed a higher NRM [RR = 1.6 (CI 1.2–2.1), p=0.001]. In patients with DLBCL, age ≥ 60 years at ASCT was associated with a trend to a higher risk of relapse or progression (p =0.07) and a worse PFS (p=0.008). PFS at 2 years was 69% vs. 79% for patients in CR1 and 52% vs. 60% for patients with sensitive disease at ASCT, respectively. In MCL, elderly patients had worse PFS (p=0.008). PFS at 2 years was 78 vs. 81% for MCL patients in CR1 and 52% vs. 67%, respectively for those patients autografted with sensitive disease. Older age was not a significant prognostic factor either for relapse rate or for PFS in patients with FL. PFS at 2 years was 69% and 81% for FL patients in CR1, and 69% and 69% for FL patients with sensitive disease, respectively. Conclusions: ASCT is feasible in selected NHL patients aged 60–69 years. The outcome is promising taking into account the generally poorer prognosis of lymphomas in elderly population.

scholarly journals Poor Prognosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Hepatitis C Infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 844
Author(s):  
Yu-Fen Tsai ◽  
Yi-Chang Liu ◽  
Ching-I Yang ◽  
Tzer-Ming Chuang ◽  
Ya-Lun Ke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Liver Involvement ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is associated with a higher prevalence and distinctive clinical characteristics and outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of adult DLBCL patients from 2011 to 2015 was studied. Results: A total of 206 adult DLBCL were enrolled with 22 (10.7%) HCV-positive patients. Compared to HCV-negative patients, the HCV-positive group had a poor performance status (p = 0.011), lower platelet count (p = 0.029), and higher spleen and liver involvement incidences (liver involvement, p = 0.027, spleen involvement, p = 0.026), and they received fewer cycles of chemotherapy significantly due to morbidity and mortality (p = 0.048). Overall survival was shorter in HCV-positive DLBCL (25.3 months in HCV-positive vs. not reached (NR), p = 0.049). With multivariate analysis, poor performance status (p < 0.001), advanced stage (p < 0.001), less chemotherapy cycles (p < 0.001), and the presence of liver toxicity (p = 0.001) contributed to poor OS in DLBCL. Among HCV-positive DLBCL, the severity of liver fibrosis was the main risk factor related to death. Conclusion: Inferior survival of HCV-positive DLBCL was observed and associated with poor performance status, higher numbers of complications, and intolerance of treatment, leading to fewer therapy. Therefore, anti-HCV therapy, such as direct-acting antiviral agents, might benefit these patients in the future.

Phase II Study of Gemtuzumab Ozogamycin (GO) and Cytarabine (ARA-C) in Patients with High Risk MDS and AML..

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4723-4723
Author(s):  
Peter Kang ◽  
Karen Seiter ◽  
Delong Liu ◽  
Muhammad Arshad ◽  
Anila Qureshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lung Damage ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
High Cumulative Dose ◽  
History Of ◽  
M 12 ◽  
To Receive

Abstract To evaluate the efficacy of GO + ara-c in high risk pts, we treated 22 pts with MDS (10) and AML (12) with cytarabine 100 mg/m2/d x 7 d and GO 9 mg/m2 x 1 on d 4. Pts with MDS were eligible if they had [1] RAEB-1 and either hgb &lt; 8 gm/dl, platelet &lt; 50,000/mm3, neutrophils &lt; 1000/mm3, or cytogenetics other than 5q-, 20q-, -y, or normal, [2] RAEB-2, or [3] CMML. Pts with AML (newly diagnosed or relapsed) were eligible if they were ineligible for anthracycline-based therapy (poor performance status: 2 pts; low ejection fraction or high cumulative dose of anthracyclines: 6 pts, both reasons: 4 pts). The median age was 66, M:12, F:10. Diagnoses: RAEB-1: 4, RAEB-2: 5, CMML: 1, AML, newly dx’d: 7, AML relapsed: 5. Cytogenetics were high risk: 10, intermediate risk: 11 pts, low risk: 1 pt. Overall, 18% had a complete response (CR) after one cycle of therapy. Three pts (14%) had a partial response (PR), of which one had a CR after a second course of therapy. Of the pts with AML: CR: 2/12, PR: 2/12, Failure (F): 5/12, Toxic Death (TD): 3/12. For pts with MDS: CR: 2/10, PR: 1/10, F: 5/10, TD: 2/10. Toxicities included neutropenic fever/sepsis, mucositis, diarrhea, increased LFTs, hemorrhage. One pt with a history of ABVD and RT to chest for HD developed direct pulmonary toxicity due to chemotherapy (diffuse pulmonary infiltrates, biopsy proven toxic lung damage). Although overall response rate is modest, some pts had remarkable responses: One pt with RAEB-1, transfusion dependent and multiple high risk cytogenetics (−5, −7, multiple others) remains in CR (including cytogenetic CR) 7 months post treatment. A second pt with RAEB-1, transfusion dependent and multiple high risk cytogenetics (−5, −7, multiple others) had a PR after one course, but was unable to receive further chemotherapy due to toxicity. The latter pts suggest that this regimen should be studied further in pts with MDS, poor risk cytogenetics and low blast counts.

What can we do for gastrointestinal cancer patients with poor performance status (PS)?

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19629-19629
Author(s):  
K. Shitara ◽  
M. Munakata ◽  
O. Muto ◽  
M. Kasai ◽  
Y. Sakata
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Gastrointestinal Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Measurable Lesion

19629 Background: The prognosis of advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients, especially those with poor PS, is generally dismal. Needless to say, such patients are ineligible for participation in clinical studies. However, there are many patients with poor PS who wish to receive chemotherapy. Methods: From June 2000 to October 2006, a total of 508 patients with advanced cancer, including 304 gastrointestinal cancer patients, were treated by chemotherapy in our hospital. Of these, 110 gastrointestinal cancer patients (gastric=35, colorectal=30, pancreatic=26, biliary tract=11, esophageal=8) had poor PS (ECOG PS 3 = 68 patients, PS 4 = 42 patients). In 103 patients with at least one measurable lesion, a partial response according to RECIST criteria was obtained in 13 patients (12.6%). In 60 patients with ascites (47 patients), pleural effusion (25 patients), or both (12 patients), 11 of the patients (18.3%) achieved decreased fluid accumulation. A decline in tumor markers (>25%) was observed in 28 patients. Improvement in PS was seen in 13 patients (11.8%). As a result, 35 patients (31.8 %, including 9 patients with PS 4) achieved a tumor response, a decrease in accumulated fluid, or a decline in tumor markers, which resulted in a survival benefit compared to the other 75 patients without effect (6.4 months vs. 2.3 months, p<0.001). Alleviation of some symptoms was observed in 28 out of 98 symptomatic patients (30.4%). A better response and/or a decline in tumor markers significantly correlated with alleviation of symptoms (p<0.001). No treatment related death was seen. Conclusions: With regard to response rate, chemotherapy was rarely effective for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer with poor PS. However, more than a few patients gained a certain survival benefit and alleviation of symptoms. Thus, chemotherapy may be warranted in cases of patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who wish to receive chemotherapy despite the low possibility of response. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Is there a role for chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with a poor performance status?

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 534-534
Author(s):  
Hui-li Wong ◽  
Kathryn M Field ◽  
Jeanne Tie ◽  
Suzanne Kosmider ◽  
Jeremy David Shapiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
To Receive

534 Background: The management of patients with poor performance status (PS) remains challenging in the absence of data on optimal treatment. Here we assessed the treatment and outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS (≥ 2) in routine clinical care. Methods: Analysis of patients prospectively entered onto the TRACC (Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer) database, a clinician-designed initiative to collect comprehensive data on consecutive patients with mCRC from sites across Australia. Data collection commenced in July 2009 and is ongoing at 14 participating public and private centres. Results: Of the 679 patients entered, 129 (19.0%) had an ECOG PS ≥ 2. In total, 77 (11.3%) were PS 2, 41 (6.0%) PS 3 and 11 (1.6%) PS 4. Chemotherapy was administered to 55 (71.4%) PS 2 and 15 (36.6%) PS 3 patients, with none of the PS 4 patients being treated. Overall, poor PS patients were significantly less likely to receive any chemotherapy compared to their good PS (PS 0-1) counterparts (55.0% versus 86.8%, p<0.0001) and, when chemotherapy was given, significantly less likely to receive combination chemotherapy (38.0% vs 71.6%, p<0.0001) or bevacizumab (15.5% vs 46.9%, p<0.0001). Overall survival (OS) was reduced with declining PS, with medians of 31.2, 9.0, 3.0 and 0.8 months for PS 0-1, 2, 3 and 4 patients respectively (p<0.0001). Poor PS patients treated with chemotherapy had a better OS outcome (9.8 vs 4.1 months for untreated patients, p<0.0001). At one and two years, 22 (31.4%) and 8 (11.4%) treated poor PS patients were alive. Conclusions: In routine practice many patients with a poor PS, particularly those that are PS 2, receive active treatment. Although overall survival for poor PS patients is poor, some patients appear to benefit from treatment. Further data analysis, particularly to define subsets that may benefit most from treatment, is planned as further sites around Australia contribute data to the project.

Patient risk factors and pegfilgrastim use in cabazitaxel-treated prostate cancer pateints in an academic setting.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 224-224
Author(s):  
Marina Dusevic Kaymakcalan ◽  
Sherri Stuver ◽  
Christopher Sweeney ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Aymen Elfiky
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact

224 Background: Cabazitaxel can offer a survival advantage in patients (pts) with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Febrile neutropenia (FN) has emerged as a serious complication, with a rate of 8% in the TROPIC trial (de Bono, Lancet 2010). Prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim (P) can decrease the risk of FN, although predictors of FN continue to evolve. We performed an analysis on the effect of prophylactic P use on FN and the impact of certain risk factors on FN rates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of mCRPC patients treated with cabazitaxel from June 2010 to August 2013 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Patient clinical and treatment variables were extracted. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the association between potential risk factors and FN. Results: A total of 89 patients were treated at our institution and included in this analysis. All patients received at least one dose of cabazitaxel and received a mean of four cycles. Five pts (5.6%) developed FN; 3 out of 70 (4.3%) receiving P and 2 out of 19 (10.5%) not receiving P (p=0.3). Of the 24 patients that started cabazitaxel at a reduced dose, none developed FN. No toxic death was reported. Among several risk factors including P use, age older than 65, pre-existing neutropenia, prior chemotherapy, pre-existing infection, poor performance status, liver and renal dysfunction, and recent surgery, only a prior history of palliative radiation had a significant association with FN (p=.002). Conclusions: The rate of FN in a large academic practice is similar to what was reported in the TROPIC trial. Prior radiation may be a risk factor for FN in cabazitaxel-treated mCRPC patients. Other factors that may help better predict the risk of FN in different groups of patients receiving cabazitaxel must be identified.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document