Vinorelbine-Cyclophosphamide Compared to Cyclophosphamide in Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization for Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Background High dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell rescue is the standard of care for transplant eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). High dose cyclophosphamide (Cy) at 4-7g/m2 with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) has been shown to be effective for haematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) mobilization despite associated haematologic toxicity.Vinorelbine 25mg/m2 in combination with Cy 1500mg/m2 (Vino-Cy) was shown to be comparable to Cy mobilization in a study using historical controls. Vino-Cy is the mobilization regimen of choice at the National University Hospital Singapore (NUH) while Cy mobilization is preferred at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH). We present a retrospective comparison of HPC mobilisation outcomes using Vino- Cy and Cy at these institutions. Methods Medical records for patients undergoing HPC mobilization between 2004 and 2014 at NUH and SGH were analysed. Patients mobilized with Vino -cy received Vinorelbine 25mg/m2 on day 1 followed by cyclophosphamide 1500mg/m2 on day 2, GCSF 10mcg/kg/day was given from day 4 onwards. Alternatively, pegylated GCSF 6mg was given on day 4. Patients mobilized with Cy were given cyclophosphamide 1500mg/m2 on day 1 and 2 and GCSF 10mcg/kg/day from day 5 onwards. Apheresis (using the cobe spectra or optia system at NUH and the Haemonetics MCS+ system at SGH) was commenced once a peripheral blood CD 34+ count of >/= 10 x 10 6/l was achieved. The number of total blood volume exchanges per apheresis was 3 at NUH and 4 at SGH. Apheresis was continued until a minimum target CD 34 collection of 5 x 10 6 per kg/BW was reached. Patients who were successfully mobilized proceeded to HDT with melphalan 200mg/m2. Results 133patients underwent HPC mobilization between 2004 and 2014. The median weight was 62 Kg for Vino Cy and 58Kg for the Cy patients (p=0.03). The groups were evenly matched in terms of age, presence of renal impairment, bone lesions, ISS stage and the use of novel agent based induction. Bortezomib based induction was used in 73% of Vino-Cy and 43% of Cy patients. A higher percentage of Cy patients were mobilized in complete remission (53%) compared to Vino-Cy (21%). Table 1 summarises the mobilization outcomes of the two groups. Although the total CD 34+ collection was greater in the Cy group, the difference in the percentage of patients achieving an adequate HPC collection was not statistically significant, 72/84 (85%) of Vino-Cy patients and 45/47 (95%) of Cy patients achieved a stem cell collection of greater than 5 x 10 6/Kg BW (P=0.07). There were two mobilization failures in each group, one of whom (a Vino-Cy patient) was previously treated with melphalan. The number of days taken to achieve an adequate peripheral blood HPC count was shorter in the Vino Cy group and the date of harvest was also more predictable for Vino Cy with a standard deviation of 0.95 compared to 1.95 for Cy. Grade 3-4 harvest related complications were significantly more common in the Cy group (table 2). There was no significant drop in haemoglobin after harvest in either group. Discussion Our data suggest that HPC mobilization maybe more effective with Cy, differing from data published by Annunziata et al which showed a superior HPC mobilization with Vino-Cy compared to the historical Cy control. Vino-Cy appears superior in terms of the time taken for an adequate peripheral CD34+ count and predictability of the day of harvest. The incidence of harvest related complications is also greater for Cy. These findings are common to our cohort and that reported by Annunziata et al. Data on transfusion requirements, hospitalization rates and survival are being collected. Prospective clinical trials are required to definitively determine which protocol is superior. Table 1. Day of protocol when harvest took place P value Number of days taken to harvest P value CD34+/Kg Collected P value Vino-Cy(n=84) Cy(n=47) Vino-Cy(n=84) Cy(n=47) Vino-Cy(n=84) Cy(n=47) Median 9 13 P=0.000 2 2 P=0.97 8.4 11.3 P=0.009 Mean 8.5 12 2 2 10.0 16.2 Maximum 11 16 5 5 32.5 73.9 Minimum 5 7 1 1 2.2 2.4 SD 0.95 1.9 0.94 0.93 5.7 14.5 Table1. Comparison of Mobilisation Outcomes with Vino-Cy and Cy. Table 2. Mobilisation Chemotherapy P value. Vino-Cy(84) Cyclophosphamide (47) Complications during and after harvest (grade3-4) 2(2.3) 9(19) 0.009 Fluid Overload 1 0 Neutropaenic Fever 1 8 Line related thrombosis 0 1 Table 2. Grade 3-4 Complications during and after stem cell collection, data presented as number (%). Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Transplantation of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Mobilized by Chemotherapy and Single Dose Pegylated G-CSF in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Equivalence of 6 mg and 12 mg Pegfilgrastim.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v104.11.2868.2868 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 104 (11) ◽

pp. 2868-2868 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Ingmar Bruns ◽

Ulrich Steidl ◽

Christof Scheid ◽

Kai Hübel ◽

Roland Fenk ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Single Dose ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

High Dose Chemotherapy ◽

High Dose ◽

Cytotoxic Therapy ◽

Cd 34 ◽

Cd34 Cells

Abstract To date the most effective treatment for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma consists of conventional induction chemotherapy followed by either single or tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation. Collection of sufficient numbers of hematopoietic stem cells is essential for high-dose chemotherapy. Current regimens for stem cell mobilization are based on daily subcutaneous injections of human recombinant G-CSF starting shortly after cytotoxic therapy. Here we examined the use of polyethyenglycole (PEG)-conjugated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim) at two different doses in patients with stage II or III multiple myeloma. Patients received induction therapy with 2–4 cycles ID or VAD. Following cytotoxic therapy with cyclophosphamide (4g/m2) we administered either a single dose of 6 mg pegfilgrastim (n=10 pts; median age: 55 years), 12 mg pegfilgrastim (n=12 pts; median age: 51 years) or daily doses of 8,5 μg/kg unconjugated G-CSF (filgrastim) (n=12 pts; median age: 51 years). The growth factor was given on day 4 (range 2–5 days) in the “6 mg pegfilgrastim group”, on day 5 (range 2–7 days) in the “12 mg pegfilgrastim group” and on day 4 (range 3–6 days) in the “filgrastim group” after cyclophosphamide. Numbers of CD34+ cells were determined during leukocyte recovery and harvested by large volume apheresis using a cobe spectra blood cell separator. Pegfilgratim was associated with an earlier leukocyte recovery both at the 6mg dose (median 12 days, range 8–16 days) and the 12mg dose (median 12 days, range 7–16 days) as compared to filgrastim (median 14 days, range 11–15 days, p=0.04). Similarily, the peripheral blood CD34+ cell peak occurred earlier in patients who received pegfilgrastim (median 12 days, range 11–18 days versus median 15 days, range 12–18). On the other hand the peripheral blood CD 34+ peak did not differ significantly between the three groups (median 129/μl with 6 mg pegfilgrastim, range 30–433, median 78/μl with 12 mg pegfilgrastim, range 20– 1055 and median 111/μl with filgrastim, range 28–760, p=0.95). With a median of 1.0x10E7 CD34+ cells per kg (range 5.8x10E6-1.9x10E7) in the “6 mg pegfilgrastim group”, 7.4x10E6 CD34+ cells per kg (median, range 4.9x10E6- 3.8x10E7) in the “12 mg pegfilgrastim group” and 10.8x10E6 CD34+ cells per kg (median, range 5.0x10E6-8.7x10E7) in the “filgrastim group” there were no significant differences in the total number of harvested CD34+ cells. Following high-dose therapy with melphalan (200 mg/m2) and autografting leukocyte and platelet reconstitution was similar within all groups. In summary, a single dose of pegfilgrastim after high dose cyclophosphamide is capable of mobilizing a sufficient number of CD 34+ cells for succesful autografting and sustained hematological reconstitution in patients with multiple myeloma. No difference could be observed between 6 mg and 12 mg of pegfilgrastim. Our data provide the basis for randomized studies evaluating the optimal dose and timing of pegfilgrastim as well as long-term outcome in larger cohorts of patients.

Download Full-text

The Optimal Timing for Stem Cell Collection After Induction Therapy for Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2252.2252 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2252-2252

Author(s):

Aziz Nazha ◽

Dan T. Vogl ◽

Una O'Doherty ◽

Patricia Mangan ◽

Kathleen Cunningham ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Optimal Timing ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Cd 34 ◽

The Mean ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 2252 Introduction: High dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplant remains an integral part of the therapy for Multiple Myeloma patients under age of 70. The collection of sufficient number of stem cells for one or more transplant is however sometimes a challenge. Moreover, the optimal timing for stem cell collection after induction chemotherapies is controversial. The standard recommendation is for stem cell collection after 4–6 cycles of non-alkylator regimen, however studies to support this practice are limited. Material and Method: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 366 patients who were diagnosed with multiple myeloma and mobilized at the Hospital of University of Pennsylvania between January 2002 and December 2008. Patients who did not meet the initial inclusion criteria were those who had induction regimens containing an alkalytor agent or whose regimens were not well documented and were excluded from futher analysis (85). Every 4 cycles of any non-alkalytor agent was considered to be one treatment session for the purpose of this analysis. 245 patients received 1 or 2 treatment sessions and 36 received > 2. All patients were mobilized with either Cyclophosphamide/G-CSF (CY/G-CSF), Plerixafor/G-CSF (AMD/G-CSF), or G-CSF alone. Result: The mean number of collected CD 34+ cells (CD 34+) was 9.22 × 106 CD34+/Kg in the patients who received 1 or 2 sessions and 6.87 × 1106 CD34+/Kg in the patients who received > 2 sessions (P= 0.005). The number of the patients who collected > 6 × 106 CD34+/Kg was 63%(153/246), 53%(19/36) respectively, (p= 0.005). The patients who mobilized with either CY/G-CSF or AMD/G-CSF collected higher number of CD34+ than the patients mobilized with G-CSF alone in both groups. (Table 1, 2.) The mean number of collected stem cells was 7.14 × 106 CD34+/Kg in the patients who received more than 2 sessions of different regimens and 6.26 × 106 CD34+/Kg in the patients who received > 2 sessions of the same regimen. Conclusion: The patients who mobilized after fewer than 8 cycles of non-alkylator agents (2 sessions) collected a higher number of CD 34+ than those with greater than 8 cycles. CY/G-CSF or AMD/G-CSF are similar and superior to G-CSF alone in the more heavily treated patients. The patients who received multiple sessions of the same regimen have similar outcome compared to those who received multiple different regimens suggesting that the duration of the treatment may impact stem cell collection more than the content of the regimen. Prospective studies in this regards are warranted. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

One-Day Low-Dose Etoposide Is an Effective Chemomobilization Regimen with Minimal Toxicity for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Study from Tertiary Hospitals in Korea

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115625 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3347-3347

Author(s):

Yong Park ◽

Dae Sik Kim ◽

Ka-Won Kang ◽

Byung-Hyun Lee ◽

Eun Sang Yu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Low Dose ◽

High Dose ◽

Tertiary Hospitals ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Purpose Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is widely used as a part of induction treatment for transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma. For successful ASCT, mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood is essential because collecting a sufficient number of stem cells using apheresis is mandatory. As a method for mobilization, chemomobilization consisting of high-dose chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone (G-mobilization) has been used. However, the mobilization failure still remains a problematic issue. Given repeated mobilization attempts increase medical costs and the risk of morbidity related with apheresis, the mobilization process should be efficient. Chemomobilization is more effective than G-mobilization, however, chemomobilization has the risk of complication such as febrile neutropenia or chemotherapy-induced second malignancy. Thus, we compared the efficacy and safety of our new chemomobilization regimen, one-day low-dose etoposide with that of two-day low-dose etoposide, one-day high-dose cyclophosphamide, and G-mobilization. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 234 patients who underwent ASCT for MM between 2008 and 2018 in four tertiary hospitals in Korea. One-day low-dose etoposide regimen (E1) was the intravenous (IV) administration of etoposide (375 mg/m2) over 4 hours whereas two-day low-dose etoposide (E2) was the same dose of etoposide on 1st and 2nd day in outpatient clinic. G-CSF administration was started around on 10th day until the end of collection. In G-mobilization regimen (G), the injection of G-CSF was started four days (day -4) before initiation of apheresis (day 0), and G-CSF once a day was maintained untill the end of collection. One-day high-dose cyclophosphamide regimen (C) was the IV administration of cyclophosphamide (3.5 g/m2) on 1st day and the daily injection of G-CSF from 2nd day until the end of stem cell collection. Peripheral blood stem cell collection was started when CD34-positive cells or hematopoietic progenitor cells were more than 5000/μL in peripheral blood, or white blood cell count was more than 5000/μL. In this study, we defined the 'adequate mobilization' as CD34-positive cells more than 4ⅹ106/kg, and 'mobilization failure' as a collected CD34-positive cells less than 2ⅹ106/kg. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was defined as more than 500/μL and 20,000/μL on consecutive two days, respectively. Results 31 patients received single dose etoposide (E1) between 2016 and 2018 whereas 28 patients received double dose etoposide (E2) between 2011 and 2018. The other two regimens were used in 105 (C, 2008-2015) and 70 patients (G, 2008-2017) according to physicians' decision. The comparison of four regimens showed the median CD34-positive cells of E1 regimen was 5.57ⅹ106/kg that was comparable to that of E2 and C (Table 1). The number of CD34-positive cells on 1st day of apheresis was 4.03ⅹ106/kg in E1 regimen, and it was higher than that of C and G (3.32 and 1.79ⅹ106/kg, respectively). As a result, E1 regimen achieved 'adequate mobilization' in 100% of patients (n=30) like E2 regimen (n=28, 100%). Mobilization failure did not occur in E1 and E2 regimens whereas 4-10% of patients experienced mobilization failure in C and G regimens (Table 1). All patients receiving E1 and E2 regimen but one patient in E1 could collect more than 4ⅹ106/kg of CD34-positive cells within three cycles of apheresis. The occurrence of febrile neutropenia was extremely lower in E1 regimen (7%) than E2 and C regimens (43% and 34%, respectively, p<0.001). Both neutrophil and platelet engraftment were the fastest in E1 (the median 9 days after ASCT, p<0.001). Conclusions One-day low-dose etoposide administration could be effective for chemomobilization in myeloma patients with reduced risk of complication compared to two-day low-dose etoposide, high-dose cyclophosphamide and G-mobilization. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Modified Thalidomide, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (TCD) to Patients with Multiple Myeloma as Primary Therapy Prior to Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v106.11.5173.5173 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 5173-5173

Author(s):

Deok-Hwan Yang ◽

Je-Jung Lee ◽

Yeo-Kyeoung Kim ◽

Jin-Ho Baek ◽

Sang-Kyun Sohn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽

Complete Response ◽

Blood Stem Cell ◽

High Dose ◽

Primary Therapy ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract In the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)-supported high-dose melphalan is now considered standard therapy, especially for younger patients. Before PBSC, a new immunomodulatory drug, thalidomide, has replaced VAD regimen as the induction therapy of choice prior to hematopoietic stem cell procurement. Thalidomide has alternative mechanisms of action and usually combines with dexamethasone or alkylating agent, but the optimal doses and the intervals of chemotherapy has been evaluated. We reported preliminary data that the patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma were treated by combined different dose-scheduled thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone as primary therapy and performed autologous stem cell collection. A total of 52 patients with MM were initially treated thalidomide-based chemotherapy from June 2003. Thalidomide was given with the three different method: 400mg/day on D1–5, D15–19 (arm A), 50mg/day daily (arm B) combined with cyclophosphamide 150mg/m2 P.O. on D1–4 and dexamethasone 20mg/m2 P.O. or I.V. on D1–5, D15–19, or thalidomide 200mg/day daily combined with dexamethasone 20mg/m2 on D1–4, 9–12, 17–20 in odd cycles and on D1–4 in even cycles (arm C), repeated every 28 days. Low-dose aspirin or warfarin was taken as prophylaxis for thrombosis. Thirty-nine (arm A: 17, arm B: 12, arm C: 10) of the 52 patients who received at least 4 cycles or more were evaluated for response and toxicity. Median age was 65 (range: 39–80) years and the total number of 158 cycles of toxicities were evaluated. After median 4 months of time to response followed, the overall response rate was 71.8% (76.5% v 75.0% v 60.0%), including 23% (17.5% v 23% v 28%) of complete or near complete response. Two patients (5.1%) died due to infection during treatment. When the toxicity of therapy was evaluated with more Grade III, two patients (5.1%) showed neurotoxicity, six patients (15.4%) showed neutropenia, and two patients (5.1%) had deep-vein thrombosis. Thirteen patients who achieved more than partial response proceeded to PBSC collection and yielded a median number of 3.78 x 106 CD 34+ cells/kg. This low or intermediate dose or periodic thalidomide combination showed positive responses, reducing toxicities, and adequate numbers of blood stem cells in patients eligible for subsequent high-dose chemotherapy.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib Added to the Standard Mobilization Regimen of G-CSF and High-Dose Cyclophosphamide Is a Safe and Effective Combination for a High Yield Stem Cell Collection While Promoting Further Tumor Mass Reduction in Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.2953.2953 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 2953-2953 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jessica L. Stern ◽

Brian Di Carlo ◽

Michael W. Schuster ◽

Tsiporah B. Shore ◽

John G. Harpel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Alkylating Agents ◽

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Mobilization ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Standard stem cell mobilization regimens for multiple myeloma patients include G-CSF alone or in combination with high dose cyclophosphamide. Given the known in vitro and in vivo synergy between alkylating agents and proteosome inhibitors, we sought to optimize the potential for concurrent cytoreduction by adding bortezomib to the mobilization regimen. Five evaluable patients, whose prior therapy consisted of six cycles of a 21-day treatment with bortezomib/dexamethasone +/− pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, were mobilized. They received IV push bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in combination with high-dose cyclophosphamide at 3mg/m2 and MESNA on day 8. G-CSF was given for 10 consecutive days starting on day 9. One patient began this regimen in nCR, two were in PR, and two were in CR by urine and serum immunofixation and bone marrow evaluation. Stem cells were easily harvested from each of the five patients. The number of CD34+ cells collected far exceeded the amount normally mobilized with cyclophosphamide and/or G-CSF alone, with four out of 5 patients collected in a single day. The two patients who began the mobilization cycle in PR continued to respond positively. Their protein levels dropped an additional 8.9 and 14.6 percent respectively during the last cycle. The patient who began mobilization in nCR achieved a CR by the end of treatment. Some expected toxicities associated with high dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF occurred. All patients experienced grade 3 and 4 cytopenias, however, they recovered and were able to continue on to transplant. Serious adverse events of grade 3 chest pain (non-cardiac), grade 4 pneumonia, and grade 4 febrile neutropenia also occurred. Bortezomib in addition to high dose cyclophosphamide followed by G-CSF is a novel, well-tolerated and efficacious combination for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. This regimen not only yields a high number of stem cells within a short collection time, but may further cytoreduce disease as well. Stem Cell Collection Patients Days Required for Collection CD34+ Stem Cells (million/kg) 1 1 21.2 2 1 47.4 3 1 22 4 1 17.9 5 4 40.6

Download Full-text