Defibrotide for the Treatment of Patients with Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome with/without Multi-Organ Dysfunction Following Chemotherapy: Results from an Ongoing Expanded Access Program

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3121-3121
Author(s):  
Nancy A. Kernan ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Angela R. Smith ◽  
Brandon M. Triplett ◽  
Stephan A. Grupp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
The United States ◽  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Chemotherapy Patients

Abstract Introduction Hepatic veno-occlusive disease, also called sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS), is an unpredictable, potentially life-threatening complication of conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Although VOD/SOS usually is thought of as a complication of HSCT, there is also a known risk in patients following chemotherapy in a non-HSCT setting. Severe hepatic VOD/SOS (ie, with multi-organ dysfunction [MOD]), may be associated with >80% mortality. Endothelial cell (EC) damage is a critical factor in the pathophysiology of VOD/SOS. Preclinical data suggest that defibrotide stabilizes ECs with direct, as well as EC-mediated, restoration of the thrombo-fibrinolytic balance. Defibrotide is approved for treatment of severe hepatic VOD/SOS in adult and pediatric patients in the European Union. In the United States, defibrotide is available as an investigational drug through an ongoing expanded-access protocol for treatment of hepatic VOD/SOS. Methods In the original protocol, patients were eligible if they had hepatic VOD/SOS by Baltimore criteria post-HSCT and MOD, defined by renal (tripling of creatinine levels or reduced creatinine clearance with or without dialysis) and/or pulmonary (need for oxygen supplementation with or without assisted ventilation) dysfunction. Symptoms of VOD/SOS were not considered adverse events (AEs) unless the event was considered serious. The protocol was later amended to include (1) post-chemotherapy patients with hepatic VOD/SOS; (2) patients with hepatic VOD/SOS without MOD, and (3) VOD/SOS per modified Seattle criteria. Enrolled patients received defibrotide 25 mg/kg/d in 4 divided doses for a recommended ≥21 days. Here, we describe efficacy and safety results with defibrotide for the subset of patients that developed VOD/SOS post-chemotherapy. Results Out of 642 patients who developed VOD/SOS and received ≥1 dose of defibrotide, 69 patients received chemotherapy without HSCT; 52% (n=36) had MOD, and 48% (n=33) did not. Median age was 8 years (range, <1 month-58.0 years), and 55 patients (80%) were ≤16 years (39 patients were children aged 2-11); 54% of patients were male. The most common primary diseases were acute lymphocytic leukemia (44%) and acute myelogenous leukemia (10%). Chemotherapeutic agents received by more than 30% of patients were vincristine, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, doxorubicin, methotrexate and PEG-L-asparaginase. Antibody-drug conjugates linked to ozogamicin that are associated with development of VOD/SOS (gemtuzumab and inotuzumab) were received by 3 and 1 patient, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimated day +100 survival rate was 77.4% (95% confidence interval, 65.4%-85.7%). For patients with MOD and without MOD, the Kaplan-Meier estimated day +100 survival rates were 74.3% (56.4%-85.7%) and 80.9% (62.3%-90.9%), respectively. Overall, ≥1 AE was reported in 44 chemotherapy patients (63.8%). Of these, 14 (20.3%) had AEs assessed by the investigator as possibly, probably, or definitely related to defibrotide. Treatment-related AEs occurring in ≥2 patients were hypotension (4.3%), nausea (2.9%), vomiting (2.9%), and epistaxis (2.9%). Hemorrhagic AEs of any severity occurring in ≥2 patients were pulmonary (7.2%), epistaxis (5.8%), and gastric (2.9%). Serious AEs were reported in 26 patients (37.7%), most commonly multi-organ failure (7.2%), hypoxia (5.8%), and pulmonary hemorrhage (5.8%). AEs led to discontinuation in 4 patients (gastric, gastrointestinal and mouth hemorrhages, epistaxis, and hypotension). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions Day+100 survival of 77.4% in patients developing VOD/SOS following a variety of chemotherapy regimens without HSCT (80% of which were pediatric, primarily children) is a clinically encouraging finding. Defibrotide treatment in this group of 69 patients developing VOD/SOS post-chemotherapy was generally well-tolerated, with only 5.8% of patients discontinuing due to an AE and no treatment-related fatalities. Enrollment to the study continues. Support: Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Disclosures Kernan: Gentium S.p.A.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Defibrotide is an investigational treatment for hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in the United States.. Richardson:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Antin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liang:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hume:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hannah:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Nejadnik:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Soiffer:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Defibrotide for the Treatment of Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome with Multi-Organ Dysfunction: Final Results from a Pivotal, Historically Controlled, Phase 3 Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 737-737
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Marcie Riches ◽  
Nancy A. Kernan ◽  
Joel A. Brochstein ◽  
Shin Mineishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction Hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS), is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Severe cases, historically defined by multi-organ dysfunction (MOD), may be associated with mortality rates of >80%. There is no FDA-approved treatment for VOD/SOS. Defibrotide (DF) has a proposed mechanism of action that includes stabilization of endothelial cells and restoration of thrombo-fibrinolytic balance. Earlier analyses of a pivotal phase 3 trial of DF in VOD/SOS plus MOD (Richardson et al. Blood. 2009;114:Abstract 654) underpinned approval of DF in the EU to treat severe hepatic VOD/SOS after HSCT. Additional data were obtained at the request of US health authorities. Here we present the final analysis: day +100 survival (primary endpoint) and complete response (CR; secondary). Methods This was a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 historical control (HC) study assessing DF. Eligible patients met Baltimore VOD/SOS criteria (total bilirubin ≥2.0 mg/dL with ≥2 of: hepatomegaly, ascites, or 5% weight gain) by day +21 post-HSCT, plus MOD (renal [trebling of creatinine levels, reduced creatinine clearance, or dialysis] and/or pulmonary [oxygen saturation ≤90%, need for oxygen supplementation/ventilator dependence]) by day +28 post-HSCT. Exclusion criteria included severe graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) of liver or gut, clinically significant bleeding, or need for ≥2 pressors. HC patients were reviewed for inclusion/exclusion criteria in a sequential review of medical charts starting 6 months prior to use of DF at each site; a blinded medical review committee made the final determination of HCs unequivocally meeting criteria for VOD/SOS with MOD. DF dose was 25 mg/kg/d in 4 divided 2-hour IV infusions q6h; recommended treatment duration was ≥21 days. Primary endpoint was day +100 survival. CR by day +100 was a secondary endpoint. Treatment difference in survival and CR rates and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated using propensity-stratified and weighted (Koch-adjusted) estimates of differences in proportions that account for baseline prognostic factors of survival (ie, ventilator and/or dialysis dependency at entry, age ≤/>16 years, transplant type, and prior HSCT). Analyses included patients treated with DF and HCs. Results There were 102 patients in the DF group and 32 cases selected as HCs. Baseline characteristics were similar in the DF and HC groups: mean age (26 and 25 years; 43% and 44% ≤16 years), allogeneic graft (88% and 84%), prior HSCT (13% and 9%), ventilator- and/or dialysis-dependent at study entry (33% and 22%), myeloablative conditioning (87% and 94%), and the most common underlying diseases (acute leukemias: 45% and 47%), respectively. In the DF-treated group, common GvHD medications included tacrolimus (49%), methotrexate (41%), and cyclosporine (38%); in the HC group, common medications were cyclosporine (72%) and methotrexate (63%). Survival at day +100 in the DF and HC groups was 38% and 25%, respectively. The propensity-stratified difference in survival was 23.0% (95.1% CI, 5.2-40.8, P = .0109). Respective observed CR rates by day +100 were 25.5% and 12.5%, and the propensity-stratified difference in CR was 19.0% (95.1% CI, 3.5-34.6, P = .0160). Comparing the earlier EU and final analyses, the survival rates at day +100 in each group did not vary; however, the propensity adjusted final analysis provided a different level of statistical significance. Day +100 CR rates in the original analysis were slightly lower in both arms at 24% and 9% due to increased data capture to investigate CR; the P value was essentially unchanged. For the DF group, 45% had an adverse event (AE) at least possibly related to study drug, and 21% had a serious AE at least possibly related to study drug. In this very sick population, percentages of patients with ≥1 AE leading to death were similar between DF and HC patients (64% and 69%), as were hemorrhagic AEs (64%, 75%) and hypotension (39%, 50%). Conclusions Based on observed study data and using a propensity-adjusted rate difference estimator, patients treated with DF had a 23% reduction in risk of death by day +100 and 19% improvement in CR rate. Overall incidence of hemorrhage and fatal AEs were similar between groups with AEs consistent with those expected in this critically ill population. Support: Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Disclosures Richardson: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Marizomib, pmalidomide, and low dose dexamethasone in RR MM. Defibrotide is an investigational treatment for hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in the United States. . Kernan:Gentium S.p.A.: Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Guinan:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: My institution received fees for research.. Martin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Steinbach:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Krishnan:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy; Millenium: Speakers Bureau. Giralt:SANOFI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TAKEDA: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Rodriguez:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Doyle:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Antin:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. D'Agostino:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Massaro:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Miloslavsky:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hume:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Iacobelli:Gentium SpA: Employment. Nejadnik:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hannah:Gentium SpA: Other: Personal fees during conduct of the study.. Soiffer:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Early Initiation of Defibrotide in Patients with Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Improves Day +100 Survival

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4311-4311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Angela R. Smith ◽  
Brandon M. Triplett ◽  
Nancy A. Kernan ◽  
Stephan A. Grupp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction Hepatic veno-occlusive disease, also called sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS), is an unpredictable, potentially life-threatening complication of conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Severe VOD/SOS (ie, with multi-organ dysfunction [MOD]) may be associated with >80% mortality. Defibrotide is approved for treatment of severe VOD/SOS in the EU. In the US, defibrotide is available through an ongoing, expanded-access study. The optimal time to initiate VOD/SOS treatment with defibrotide is of interest. Methods In the expanded-access study, patients were eligible in the original protocol if they had VOD/SOS and renal/pulmonary MOD by Baltimore criteria post-HSCT or by biopsy. The protocol was amended to include (1) post-chemotherapy patients, (2) patients without MOD, and (3) VOD/SOS per modified Seattle criteria. Defibrotide 25 mg/kg/day was given in 4 divided doses for a recommended ≥21 days. Here, Day +100 survival in patients with HSCT was examined post hoc based on time from VOD/SOS diagnosis (with or without MOD as relevant to study entry criterion) to initiation of defibrotide. Two analyses were conducted: (1) survival rate analyzed by treatment initiation for the entire population before or after each of the following days: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14, using Fisher's exact test; (2) survival rate for only those patients with treatment initiated on a particular day: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8-14, and ≥15, with a Cochran-Armitage test for trend across days. Results Among HSCT patients enrolled through 2013 who received ≥1 dose of defibrotide, treatment date was available for 573 patients. Of these, 351 also had MOD. Defibrotide was started on the day of diagnosis in >30% of patients; >90% of patients started defibrotide before day 7 post-diagnosis. In the population-wide analysis of treatment initiation before or after days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14, earlier initiation of defibrotide was associated with higher survival rates (Table), and was statistically significant for all cut-points considered except 14 days, with only 2.8% of patients beginning treatment post-day 14. Survival differences between earlier vs. later initiation ranged from 8.8% to 22.1% overall (MOD: 12.8% to 25.6%; Table) for the cut-points considered. In the analysis of relationship between Day +100 survival and treatment initiation day, survival rates were generally higher if treatment was initiated earlier. This was demonstrated by a statistically significant trend over time for better outcomes with earlier initiation (Figure). Similar results for both analyses were obtained for all patients with VOD/SOS and for the subgroup of patients with MOD. Conclusions Data indicate decreased Day +100 survival associated with longer treatment delays, confirmed by the Cochran Armitage trend test (P<0.001). Thus, defibrotide treatment should be initiated as soon as possible after VOD/SOS diagnosis. Table. Day +100 Survival by Defibrotide Initiation Day n (%) HSCT VOD/SOS (N=573) HSCT VOD/SOS with MOD (n=351) Initiation Period Alive Dead Unknown Alive Dead Unknown ≤1 Day 183 (53.5) 142 (41.5) 17 (5.0) 103 (50.2) 93 (45.4) 9 (4.4) >1 Day 105 (45.5) 116 (50.2) 10 (4.3) 56 (38.4) 85 (58.2) 5 (3.4) Difference (95% CI)a 8.8% (0.2%, 17.3%) 12.8% (2.0%, 23.4%) P valueb 0.045 0.021 ≤2 Days 235 (55.7) 166 (39.3) 21 (5.0) 132 (52.2) 111 (43.9) 10 (4.0) >2 Days 53 (35.1) 92 (60.9) 6 (4.0) 27 (27.6) 67 (68.4) 4 (4.1) Difference (95% CI)a 22.1% (12.6%, 31.2%) 25.6% (13.8%, 36.9%) P valueb <.001 <.001 ≤3 Days 251 (53.5) 193 (41.2) 25 (5.3) 138 (49.5) 129 (46.2) 12 (4.3) >3 Days 37 (35.6) 65 (62.5) 2 (1.9) 21 (29.2) 49 (68.1) 2 (2.8) Difference (95% CI)a 20.3% (9.6%, 30.8%) 21.7% (8.6%, 34.5%) P valueb <.001 0.001 ≤4 Day 263 (52.6) 212 (42.4) 25 (5.0) 146 (48.7) 142 (47.3) 12 (4.0) >4 Day 25 (34.2) 46 (63.0) 2 (2.7) 13 (25.5) 36 (70.6) 2 (3.9) Difference (95% CI)a 20.2% (7.7%, 32.4%) 24.2% (9.1%, 38.9%) P valueb 0.002 0.002 ≤7 Days 275 (51.6) 232 (43.5) 26 (4.9) 152 (47.4) 156 (48.6) 13 (4.0) >7 Days 13 (32.5) 26 (65.0) 1 (2.5) 7 (23.3) 22 (73.3) 1 (3.3) Difference (95% CI)a 20.9% (4.5%, 37.1%) 25.2% (6.1%, 43.8%) P valueb 0.013 0.011 ≤14 Days 282 (50.6) 249 (44.7) 26 (4.7) 156 (45.9) 171 (50.3) 13 (3.8) >14 Days 6 (37.5) 9 (56.3) 1 (6.3) 3 (27.3) 7 (63.6) 1 (9.1) Difference (95% CI)a 13.1% (-12.9%, 39.5%) 17.7% (-14.6%, 51.5%) P valueb 0.433 0.344 aAlive and Dead. 95% CI calculated using exact method. bFisher's exact test, Alive and Dead. Support: Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Disclosures Richardson: Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Defibrotide is an investigational treatment for hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in the United States.. Kernan:Gentium S.p.A.: Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Antin:Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Miloslavsky:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hume:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hannah:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Nejadnik:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Registry Of Patients Treated With Protein C Concentrate (Human) In The United States and Europe: Interim Results

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1146-1146
Author(s):  
Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson ◽  
Paul Knoebl ◽  
Amy D. Shapiro ◽  
Maureen Finnerty ◽  
Leman Yel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Protein C ◽  
The United States ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Protein C Concentrate ◽  
Concentrate Treatment ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Protein C (PC) is a naturally occurring, vitamin-K dependent anticoagulant produced by the liver. Deficiency of PC, which can be congenital or acquired, results in a hypercoagulable state. Patients with severe PC deficiency may manifest severe, often life-threatening, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), purpura fulminans (PF), and/or thromboembolism. Highly purified protein C concentrate prepared from human donor plasma (Ceprotin; Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Westlake Village, CA) is an approved therapy for prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis and PF in patients with severe congenital PC deficiency (SCPCD) in the United States. It is indicated in patients with SCPCD for PF and coumarin-induced skin necrosis, and short-term prophylaxis in the European Union and other countries. Use of protein C concentrate (human) has been reported in patients with acquired PC deficiency. The Ceprotin Treatment Registry is a prospective, international, multi-center, open-label, non-interventional, observational study designed to examine the long-term safety and effectiveness of protein C concentrate (human) in the clinical setting. This is the first large, real-world assessment of the treatment of a rare disease with protein C concentrate (human). Here we report data from the first interim analysis in June 2013 covering a 3-year enrollment period. Methods Patients of any age who received, or were initiating/receiving protein C concentrate are included. The study duration is 5 years (3-year enrollment period plus 2 years of follow-up). All study visits/assessments are in accordance with standard of care, with protein C concentrate dose, dose frequency, duration and route of administration determined by the investigator. The study objectives are to determine the most common medical diagnoses associated with protein C concentrate treatment, protein C concentrate treatment regimens, and safety information based on all serious adverse events (SAEs) and rate of treatment-related AE. Other objectives include: an examination of the relationship between protein C concentrate treatment and outcomes in all registry participants, as well as various subgroups. Descriptive statistical analyses are used. Results At the time of data extraction, 34 patients were enrolled from 26 centers; 10 centers in the United States and 16 centers in Europe. Half of the patients were males. The primary diagnosis of PC deficiency was congenital in 25 patients (73.5%) and acquired in 9 patients (26.5%). The median age at diagnosis was 0.03 years (range 0–19.9). Mean plasma PC activity level was 9% (range 1–40.0). The most common (in ≥3 patients) thrombotic disease-associated conditions were PF (50.0%); blindness (44.1%); thromboembolic disease (41.2%), which included deep vein thrombosis, arterial thrombosis and DIC; stroke (32.4%), and renal dysfunction (8.8%). Of the 23 patients being treated with protein C concentrate, 15 were administered protein C concentrate intravenously, and 8 patients received protein C concentrate subcutaneously. The body weights of patients receiving subcutaneous treatment ranged from 10.0 kg to 57.9 kg. A total of 15 patients received an anticoagulant treatment in addition to protein C concentrate. Eight patients reported 23 SAEs, all of which were considered not related to treatment. Eighteen (52.9%) patients reported 72 AEs; only 1 of them, an episode of upper respiratory infection, was considered possibly treatment-related. In 18 patients in whom PC activity recovery was determined after protein C concentrate treatment, there were no patients documented with poor recovery. Protein C concentrate was used during 18 surgeries/invasive procedures and considered effective in all interventions for which data were available. Conclusions Data from the first interim analysis of the Ceprotin Treatment Registry demonstrate that patients with both congenital and acquired severe PC deficiency who are treated with protein C concentrate (human) have a low incidence of treatment related SAEs and AEs, and treatment with protein C concentrate appears to be effective when used during surgery/invasive procedures. Further patient follow up will shed light onto clinical treatment outcomes. Disclosures: Manco-Johnson: CSL Behring: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen Idec: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter BioScience: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer HealthCare: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding. Knoebl:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria; Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria. Shapiro:Cangene: Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Research Funding; Baxter BioScience: Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare: Research Funding. Finnerty:Baxter: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yel:Baxter: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gelmont:Baxter: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Patterns of Care of Aged Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients in the United States: Systematic Analysis of 457 Patients in the Connect CLL Registry

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4672-4672
Author(s):  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Natalie Galanina ◽  
Neil E. Kay ◽  
Anthony R. Mato ◽  
David L. Grinblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
The United States ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Patterns Of Care ◽  
First Line ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Introduction: The median age at diagnosis for CLL pts in the US is 72 years. As clinical trials in CLL have largely enrolled younger pt populations, data on disease and pts' characteristics, patterns of care, prognosis, and molecular features in aged CLL pts are limited. With this in mind, we conducted a prospective study to update critical demographic data and patterns of care for aged CLL pt. Patients and Methods: Connect®-CLL is a US-based prospective, longitudinal, multi-center, observational registry that is aimed at understanding patterns of CLL management without a study-specific intervention. We enrolled pts treated at an academic (n=155) or community (n=1340) setting between 2010 and 2014. Eligible pts were adults with a clinical diagnosis of CLL who required therapy 2 or less months after enrollment. Data on demographics, baseline characteristics, and treatment selection are presented here using descriptive statistics. Continuous variables are reported using appropriate measures of dispersion and central tendency (means, medians, ranges and standard deviations) while categorical variables are summarized as number and percentage of the analysis population. Results: Of 1495 enrolled pts, 457 (30.5%) were ≥75 years (57.3% males, 94.2% white). Rai stage III/IV was noted in 33% and B symptoms (predominantly fatigue (58.4%)) were observed in 68.1%. These and other clinical baseline characteristics appeared similar to pts younger than 75 years except that older pts had more prior malignancies (33.5% vs. 19.8%) and co-morbidities (69.3% vs. 53.6%). Cardiac, neurologic, and renal disorders were the most common morbidities in pts ≥75 years (11.5%, 8.8%, and 4.6% respectively). Imaging studies were performed in 157 (60.2%) older pts and in 416 (65.7%) pts less than 75 years prior to initial therapy. Percentage of pts with bulky nodes (> 5 cm) by imaging was similar in the two groups, 19.3% overall. Prognostic biomarker data were available on 247 pts (178 (72%) <75 years; 69 (28%) ≥75 years). While a higher proportion of older pts had CD38+ CLL (55.1% vs. 40.5%, P=0.038), the proportions of patients with ZAP-70+ CLL were similar between the two groups. In total, 137 (9%) older and 378 (25%) younger pts had 17p and 11q analysis by FISH at enrollment prior to first-line therapy. Of these, 27.0% of pts ≥75 years and 20.6% of pts <75 years had a deletion of either 17p or 11q (P=0.125). Out of all pts enrolled in the registry, 894 (60%) received first-line treatment (261 (29%) pts ≥75 years and 633 (71%) <75 years) as their indication for study entry. Amongst these treated pts, interim analysis shows (data cutoff date: 25 June 2014) progressive marrow failure was more commonly used as the indication for therapy in older pts compared to younger pts (52.1% vs. 38.5%; P<0.001), while splenomegaly was a more common cause for therapy in younger pts (16% vs. 9%; P<0.01). Rai stage III/IV at time of first therapy was 46% and 49% for younger and older pts, respectively. Progressive lymphocytosis was used as the indication for therapy in one third of pts regardless of age. Seventy-four percent of older CLL pts received first-line therapies containing rituximab (R) vs. 85% in pts <75 years (P<0.0001). R-bendamustine was the most common first-line regimen for CLL pts ≥75 (23.4%) while FCR was more commonly given to pts <75 years (32.5%). R-monotherapy was used in 18.8% of older pts versus 9.5% in pts <75 years (P<0.0001). Of note, approximately 25% of CLL pts ≥75 years did not receive R-based regimens for initial therapy. Conclusions: Connect®-CLL is the largest prospective, multicenter CLL registry in the United States. CLL Pts ≥75 years more frequently overexpress CD38 and may more commonly demonstrate high risk cytogenetics by FISH, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Pts ≥75 years also more commonly had co-morbid diseases, and surprisingly 25% did not receive first-line R-based therapy. CLL pts are rarely included in front-line clinical trials (<3%). Given that novel therapies are increasingly available for CLL patients a continued analysis is warranted to determine their use in elderly vs younger patients as well. A longer follow up is needed to evaluate the impact of these findings on outcomes. Disclosures Nabhan: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in CLL. Kay:Celgene: Research Funding. Mato:Genentech, Celgene, Millenium: Speakers Bureau. Grinblatt:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kipps:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lamanna:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Weiss:Celgene: Consultancy. Flinn:Celgene: Research Funding. Swern:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Street:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kristen:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Flowers:Celgene, Prescription Solutions, Seattle Genetics, Millennium (unpaid), Genentech (unpaid) : Consultancy; Gilead, Spectrum, Millennium, Janssen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Current Practice Patterns and Patient Persistence on Anticoagulant Treatments for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 626-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Keith McCrae ◽  
Dejan Milentijevic ◽  
Jonathan Fortier ◽  
Winnie Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Cancer Associated Thrombosis

Abstract Introduction: Therapeutic options for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer remain limited. Guidelines recommend anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) monotherapy for ≥3-6 months, and possibly indefinitely, for patients with active cancer. However, drug cost and patient preference issues may lead to non-compliance with these recommendations. The objective of this study is to describe current treatment patterns and to evaluate patient persistence on various anticoagulants. Methods: Medical and pharmacy claims from the Humana Database were analyzed. To reflect recent treatment patterns, the study population was restricted to patients who had their first VTE between 1/1/2013 and 12/31/2014. Newly diagnosed cancer patients with a first VTE diagnosis (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] or pulmonary embolism [PE]) occurring after their first cancer diagnosis (a 30-day window before the cancer diagnosis was allowed), and with ≥1 dispensing of an anticoagulant agent within 30 days after their VTE diagnosis, were selected. Based on the first anticoagulant agent received, patients were classified into one of the following cohorts: LMWH, LMWH/warfarin, warfarin and rivaroxaban. Use of other anticoagulants including fondaparinux, heparin, apixaban, or dabigatran was low and could not be analyzed due to small sample size. The observation period spanned from the date of the first anticoagulant dispensing to the end of insurance eligibility or the end of data availability, whichever occurred earlier. Discontinuation of the index therapy was defined by a time gap without refill of the index anticoagulant for more than 60 days after the presumed exhaustion of the last known dispensing. For patients in the LMWH/warfarin group, the 2 medications were filled simultaneously as an index therapy, with the expectation that the patients were bridged to warfarin; therefore, their persistence was evaluated based on warfarin therapy. Persistence on therapy was assessed for 12 months using Kaplan-Meier rates, and unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the time to discontinuation between cohorts. Results: A total of 2,941 newly diagnosed patients with cancer who developed VTE and received anticoagulation in outpatient settings were identified. Of these, 97% received anticoagulation with either LMWH (n=735; 25%), LMWH/warfarin (n=550; 18.7%), warfarin (n=853; 29%), rivaroxaban (n=709; 24.1%). Mean age and gender were similar across treatment cohorts. Approximately 90% of the patients had diagnoses of solid tumors. Diagnoses for DVT, PE, and DVT/PE were 55%, 27%, and 18%, respectively, and were similar across cohorts. Treatments for cancers associated with very high VTE risk (stomach, pancreas, and brain) ranged from 15% in LMWH to 6% in rivaroxaban cohorts, while high VTE risk (lung, lymphoma, gynecologic, bladder, testicular, and renal) ranged from 39% in LMWH to 30% in warfarin and LMWH/warfarin cohorts. Around 75% (warfarin) to 58% (rivaroxaban) of the VTE cases were diagnosed in inpatient settings. The median treatment durations for LMWH, LMWH/warfarin, warfarin, and rivaroxaban users were 3.29, 7.76, 8.12, and 7.92 months, respectively. Kaplan-Meier rates of persistence to the initial therapy were 37%, 60%, 62%, and 61% at 6 months, and 21%, 37%, 34%, and 36% and at 12 months for the LMWH, LMWH/warfarin, warfarin and rivaroxaban cohorts, respectively (Figure 1). LMWH/warfarin, warfarin, and rivaroxaban users were significantly more likely to remain on their initial therapy compared to LMWH, with hazard ratios (HRs; 95% CI) of 0.38 (0.32-0.45), 0.40 (0.34-0.46), and 0.42 (0.36-0.50), respectively (all p-values <0.0001). The proportion of patients that switched from their initial treatment to another anticoagulation treatment was 22.9%, 8.9%, 7.3% and 4.7% in the LMWH, LMWH/warfarin, warfarin, and rivaroxaban cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: This real-world analysis showed that despite guidelines recommendations, warfarin and rivaroxaban are nearly equally utilized as LMWH for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. LMWH was associated with significantly lower persistence and shorter duration of treatment than warfarin and rivaroxaban. More patients switched from LMWH to other anticoagulants compared to patients starting on warfarin or rivaroxaban treatments. Disclosures Khorana: sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria. McCrae:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Milentijevic:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fortier:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Nelson:Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment. Laliberté:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Crivera:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lefebvre:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Yannicelli:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schein:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment.

Efficacy and Safety of Ponatinib According to Prior Approved Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Therapy in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML): Results From the PACE Trial

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3749-3749
Author(s):  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
Philipp le Coutre ◽  
Ronald Paquette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3749 Background: Ponatinib is a potent pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor that is active against native and mutated forms of BCR-ABL, including the uniformly TKI-resistant T315I mutant. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg orally once daily) in patients with CP-CML were evaluated in a pivotal phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial. Objectives: This prospectively defined analysis was performed to evaluate the impact that previous exposure to approved TKIs had on the efficacy and safety of ponatinib treatment among patients with CP-CML. Methods: The PACE trial enrolled 449 patients, including 270 patients with CP-CML. Enrolled patients were required to be resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib, or they had to have the T315I mutation at baseline. Patients with CP-CML were assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts: R/I (N=203) or T315I (N=64). Three patients were post-imatinib and did not have T315I at baseline; they were treated but not assigned to a cohort. The primary endpoint was major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at any time within 12 months after treatment initiation. The trial is ongoing. Data as of 23 July 2012 are reported, with a minimum follow-up of 9 months (median 12 [0.1 to 19] months). The efficacy and safety of ponatinib according to prior approved TKI therapy (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib) is presented for the total CP-CML (N=270) population. Results: The median age of CP-CML patients was 60 (18 to 94) years. Median time from initial diagnosis to start of ponatinib was 7 (0.5 to 27) years. Patients were heavily pretreated: 97% had received prior imatinib, 80% dasatinib, 68% nilotinib; 7% of patients had received 1 prior approved TKI, 40% 2 prior approved TKIs, 53% all 3 prior approved TKIs; 60% had received ≥3 prior approved/investigational TKIs. In patients previously treated with dasatinib or nilotinib (N=256), 84% had a history of resistance and 16% were purely intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib. At the time of analysis, 66% of patients remained on study. The most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; 12%) and progressive disease (7%). Response rates according to the number of prior approved TKIs are shown in the table below. Patients receiving fewer prior approved TKIs had higher response rates. The difference in MCyR rate was statistically significant for patients previously treated with 1 vs. 3 approved TKIs (p=0.003) and for patients previously treated with 2 vs. 3 approved TKIs (p=0.011). Differences in MMR rates were not statistically significant. Of patients achieving MCyR, 98% of patients receiving 2 prior approved TKIs and 83% of patients receiving 3 prior approved TKIs were predicted (Kaplan-Meier) to remain in MCyR at 1 year. Of patients achieving MMR, 86% of patients receiving 2 prior approved TKIs and 80% of patients receiving 3 prior approved TKIs were predicted (Kaplan-Meier) to remain in MMR at 1 year. Kaplan-Meier estimates were not calculable for patients receiving 1 prior TKI. The most common treatment-related AEs according to number of prior approved TKIs (1, 2, 3, respectively) were thrombocytopenia (32%, 38%, 44%), rash (37%, 37%, 39%), dry skin (37%, 36%, 39%), abdominal pain (21%, 26%, 28%), and headache (26%, 28%, 19%). Rash, dry skin, abdominal pain, and headache were generally grade 1 or 2 in severity. Thrombocytopenia was typically reported early in treatment and was manageable with or without dose reductions and/or dose interruptions. Conclusions: Ponatinib has substantial activity in patients with CP-CML, with higher response rates and improved tolerability observed in patients receiving fewer prior approved TKIs. Data with a minimum follow-up of 12 months will be presented. Disclosures: Kim: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, ARIAD, and Il-Yang: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cortes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD, Pfizer, and Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis, BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. le Coutre:Novartis and BMS: Honoraria. Paquette:ARIAD: Consultancy. Chuah:Novartis and Bristol Myers-Squibb: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Apperley:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Talpaz:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abruzzese:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rea:Bristol Myers-Squibb, Novartis, and Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Muller:ARIAD: Consultancy. Wong:MolecularMD Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guilhot:ARIAD: Honoraria. Hochhaus:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, and MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Amgen: Honoraria. Shah:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Weekly Carfilzomib with Dexamethasone for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Results from the Phase 1/2 Study Champion-1 (NCT01677858)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 373-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Berenson ◽  
Alan Cartmell ◽  
Roger Lyons ◽  
Wael Harb ◽  
Dimitrios Tzachanis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
The United States ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Carfilzomib is an irreversible proteasome inhibitor that is approved as a single agent in the United States and other countries for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM); carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide (LEN) and dexamethasone is also approved in the United States for the treatment of relapsed MM. The approved dose and schedule of carfilzomib is a twice-weekly, 10-min intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day cycles (starting dose: 20 mg/m2 [days 1 and 2 of cycle 1]; escalated to a target dose of 27 mg/m2 thereafter). Here we present updated results from the multicenter, phase 1/2 study CHAMPION-1 (NCT01677858), which evaluated the safety and efficacy of once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone (Kd) in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory MM (1-3 prior lines of therapy) were eligible. Patients received carfilzomib as a 30-min IV infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. The phase 1 portion of the study utilized a standard 3+3 dose-escalation scheme. All patients received carfilzomib at 20 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycle 1; patients received 45, 56, 70, or 88 mg/m2 beginning on day 8 of cycle 1 in successive dose-level cohorts until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached. All patients received dexamethasone 40 mg (IV or oral administration) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycles 1-8; dexamethasone was omitted on day 22 in cycles ≥ 9. In the phase 2 portion, patients received carfilzomib at the MTD (carfilzomib dose of 20 mg/m2 on cycle 1, day 1; escalating to the MTD for subsequent doses) and dexamethasone at the same dose and schedule. Kd was administered until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary objective of the phase 1 portion was to determine the MTD of carfilzomib in the Kd regimen; the primary objective of the phase 2 portion was to determine the overall response rate (ORR [≥partial response]). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. Results: A total of 27 patients were enrolled in phase 1; the MTD of carfilzomib was determined to be 70 mg/m2. Results are presented for all patients treated with Kd at the carfilzomib MTD in both the phase 1b (n=15) and phase 2 (n=89) portions of the study. Among these 104 patients, median patient age was 68.5 years (range, 41-88). Patients received a median of 1 prior line of therapy (range, 1-3); 83% of patients had received prior bortezomib (BTZ), 49% of patients were BTZ-refractory, 27% were LEN-refractory, and 16% were refractory to both BTZ and LEN. Median carfilzomib treatment duration was 7.7 months (range, 0.03-24.2). The ORR was 77% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68%-85%); the clinical benefit rate (≥minimal response) was 84% (95% CI: 75%-90%). Kaplan-Meier median progression-free survival was 12.6 months (95% CI: 9.0-not estimable). Twelve patients (12%) discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. The most common adverse events of any grade and of grade ≥3 are shown in the Table. Five patients died on study: 1 patient each had cause of death reported as disease progression, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, and cardiopulmonary arrest. The mean area under the curve and maximum concentration following a 70-mg/m2 carfilzomib dose was 1050 ng×h/mL and 2510 ng/mL, respectively. At 1 hour post dosing of carfilzomib 70 mg/m2, the activity of the predominant chymotrypsin-like proteasome catalytic subunit in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (ie, low molecular mass polypeptide 7) was strongly inhibited (97% inhibition as determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ProCISE]; 93% inhibition as determined by a fluorogenic substrate assay). Conclusions: CHAMPION-1 is the first clinical study to evaluate carfilzomib on a weekly dosing schedule. Once-weekly carfilzomib (70 mg/m2) with dexamethasone demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability with promising efficacy for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The dose and schedule of carfilzomib used in the CHAMPION-1 study (20/70 mg/m2) is currently being compared with the regulatory-approved carfilzomib dose and schedule (20/27 mg/m2 administered twice-weekly) in the ongoing, phase 3, superiority study ARROW (NCT02412878). Disclosures Lyons: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Insyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Harb:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Boccia:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria. Moss:Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rifkin:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schupp:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dixon:Onyx/Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ou:Onyx/Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderl:Onyx/Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berdeja:Abbvie: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Genomic Predictors of Progression-Free Survival Among Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated with Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone or Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in the Phase 3 Endeavor Trial

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 839-839
Author(s):  
Robert J Pelham ◽  
Xuguang Hu ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Hang Quach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Rank Statistic ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Cross

Abstract Background: In the phase 3 ENDEAVOR trial, treatment with carfilzomib administered at 56 mg/m2 twice weekly in combination with dexamethasone (Kd56) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) (Dimopoulos MA, et al. Lancet Oncol . 2016;17:27-38). In this substudy of ENDEAVOR, we used whole transcriptome RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to identify genes whose baseline expression levels in CD138+ cells were predictive of PFS in patients treated with Kd56 or Vd. The objective of this study was to develop a genomic classifier that could be used to stratify patients for benefit with Kd56 or Vd therapy. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive Kd56 or Vd at a 1:1 ratio. Patients who consented for this biomarker study and provided samples (Kd56, n = 155; Vd, n = 148) were included. CD138+ cells were isolated from bone marrow aspirate collected at baseline. Sequencing libraries for isolated RNA samples were prepared using an Illumina TruSeq RNA library construction kit and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Sequencing reads were aligned against the human reference genome GRCh38 using STAR RNA-seq aligner and annotated with GENCODE v24 at the gene level. Expression counts were estimated using RSEM software and converted to counts per million for subsequent analyses using the edgeR package. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with LASSO was used to model the relationship between patients' baseline gene expression and PFS. A classifier was established and its predictive performance was assessed using the cross-validation scheme outlined by Simon et al (Brief Bioinform . 2011;12:203-214). The statistical significance of the cross-validated Kaplan-Meier curves and corresponding log-rank statistic was estimated by generating an approximate null distribution of the cross-validated log-rank statistic through 500 random permutations. For each permutation, the patients' baseline gene expression profiles and treatment assignments were randomly re-shuffled against patients' survival times and event indicators, and the same cross-validation procedures used in the model performance assessment were repeated to compute the cross-validated log-rank statistic for the permuted data. Results: Among the 303 Kd56 or Vd patients included in this biomarker study, patients in the Kd56 arm had a 58% reduced risk of progression or death compared with patients in the Vd arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.59; P= 4.5 x 10-7). We developed a linearized classifier using patients' baseline gene expression (n = 303) to stratify patients for PFS benefit from Kd56 or Vd therapy. The cross-validated Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank statistic for the classifier were statistically significant at P &lt; 0.001. A 13-gene classifier derived from the whole data set could separate patients from the Kd56 arm (n = 155) into two distinct subgroups, in which one with 113 (73%) patients had a PFS benefit over the other with 42 (27%) patients (HR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.06-0.26; P= 3.3 x 10-13). When these 42 patients were excluded from the Kd56 arm, the PFS benefit for the Kd56 arm (n = 113) over the Vd arm (n = 148) was improved by 52% (HR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.12-0.31; P= 2.0 x 10-14). The classifier was unable to stratify patients in the Vd arm for high or low PFS benefit. The 13 genes included in the classifier were ACOXL, CLEC2B, CLIP4, COCH, FRK, IGHD, ITPRIPL2, NAP1L5, RNASE6, SH3RF3, SHROOM3, TCF7, and UGT3A2 . Several genes in this classifier, including CLIP4, IGHD, and SH3RF3, have been previously implicated in myeloma biology and in vitroresistance to proteasome inhibitors. Individually, each gene showed similar ability to stratify patients from the Kd56 arm, but the cross-validated Kaplan-Meier curves for the individual genes were not significant at P &lt; 0.05. Conclusions: We identified a classifier with a set of genes whose baseline expression could potentially be used to stratify RRMM patients for greater treatment benefit with Kd56. As only one patient cohort was used for this study, the classifier identified here should be validated in prospective studies and with independent sets of patient cohorts. Further study of this group of genes may provide additional insights into the biology of multiple myeloma and how mechanism of action differs between carfilzomib and bortezomib. Disclosures Pelham: Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hu: Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen, Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oriol: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored symposia, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored symposia; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored symposia, Speakers Bureau. Quach: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Kovacsovics: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Flexus: Research Funding. Keats: Amgen: Research Funding. Feng: Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kimball: Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dimopoulos: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, an Amgen subsidiary, Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Committee: Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, an Amgen subsidiary, Takeda Oncology; Genesis Pharma: Research Funding.

Examining the Clinical Features and Underlying Cardiovascular Risk Among Patients with Polycythemia Vera in the REVEAL Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1934-1934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brady L. Stein ◽  
Ahmad Naim ◽  
Michael R. Grunwald ◽  
Alison R. Moliterno ◽  
Stephen T. Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Reveal Study ◽  
History Of ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background:Patients with polycythemia vera (PV) often present with a broad range of clinical characteristics that may contribute to increased risks of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, including thrombotic events (TE). Limited contemporary real-world data have been reported about the clinical burden of PV and treatment patterns in the United States. The ongoing REVEAL study collects data on disease burden, clinical management, patient-reported outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization for patients with PV in the United States. This analysis reports clinical characteristics, including underlying CV risk factors, for patients enrolled in the REVEAL study as of April 28, 2016. Methods: REVEAL is a multicenter, nonrandomized, prospective, observational study enrolling patients ≥18 years of age with a PV diagnosis who are actively managed in an academic or community setting. For this analysis, data regarding PV disease and diagnosis, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns were collected at enrollment during usual-care visits and were based on physician assessment, electronic medical records, and local laboratory values. Ten-year CV risk factors selected for this analysis were adapted from the Framingham Heart Study for CV diseases. Results: At data cutoff, 2307 patients were available for this analysis. Mean (SD) age was 66.3 (12.2) years, 54.4% were male, 89.9% were white, 62.7% had at least some college education, and 51.1% were retired. Approximately 6% of patients had a family history of PV, primarily in parents (35.1%) and siblings (33.8%). A history of second malignancies was reported for 344 patients (14.9%). The majority of patients (84.6%) were diagnosed with PV based on an abnormal blood test alone or in combination with a bone marrow test. Among patients who were diagnosed with a mutational test (n=1078), 95.2% were diagnosed via an abnormal JAK2V617F test result. Abnormal hemoglobin (57.3%), hematocrit (55.4%), or both (47.5%) were among the most common blood values assessed for PV diagnosis. At diagnosis, 58.5% of patients were classified with high-risk PV (age ≥60 years or history of a TE); this percentage increased to 77.3% at REVEAL enrollment. The average (SD) disease duration from diagnosis to enrollment was 5.8 (6.1) years. At enrollment, 91.5% of patients were under active management for PV (phlebotomy ± aspirin, 34.0%; hydroxyurea ± aspirin, 27.0%; and phlebotomy + hydroxyurea ± aspirin, 23.2%). Underlying CV risk factors that were either diagnosed or treated in 86.0% of enrolled patients included hypertension (66.5%), history of smoking (46.2%), current smoking at enrollment (10.9%), obesity (34.2%), hyperlipidemia (27.4%), and diabetes (14.8%). At enrollment, 431 (18.7%) patients reported having ≥1 TE, including 181 patients who had a TE between PV diagnosis and enrollment. Venous and arterial TEs were reported in 11.1% and 8.6% of patients, respectively. Most commonly reported venous TEs were deep vein thrombosis (5.9%) and pulmonary embolism (2.5%); most common arterial TEs were cerebrovascular arterial thrombosis including transient ischemic attack (5.1%) and acute myocardial infarction (1.7%). Increased rates of TEs were observed among patients with hyperlipidemia (23.6%) and hypertension (21.0%; Table 1), compared with patients who did not have any risk factors (10.5%). Conclusion: A large proportion of patients in the REVEAL study had 1 or more underlying CV risks, including age, hypertension, smoking, obesity, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, which may contribute to the risk of thrombosis. Longitudinal data from REVEAL will provide a better understanding of how these factors affect CV outcomes over time. Disclosures Stein: Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Naim:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Grunwald:Janssen: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Medtronic: Equity Ownership; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Oh:Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding. Paranagama:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cordaro:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sun:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Parasuraman:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boccia:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mesa:Ariad: Consultancy; CTI: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Promedior: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Rapid and Robust Mobilization of CD34+ HSCs without G-CSF Following Administration of Mgta-145 Alone or in Combination with Plerixafor

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1961-1961
Author(s):  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
Jonathan Hoggatt ◽  
Steven Devine ◽  
Lukasz Biernat ◽  
Haley Howell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Fold Change ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the standard of care for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). G-CSF requires 4-7 days of injections and often multiple aphereses to acquire sufficient CD34+ cells for transplant. The number of CD34+ HSCs mobilized can be variable and patients who fail to mobilize enough CD34+ cells are treated with the combination of G-CSF plus plerixafor. G-CSF use is associated with bone pain, nausea, headaches, fatigue, rare episodes of splenic rupture, and is contraindicated for patients with autoimmune and sickle cell disease. MGTA-145 (GroβT) is a CXCR2 agonist. MGTA-145, in combination with plerixafor, a CXCR4 inhibitor, has the potential to rapidly and reliably mobilize robust numbers of HSCs with a single dose and same-day apheresis for transplant that is free from G-CSF. MGTA-145 plus plerixafor work synergistically to rapidly mobilize HSCs in both mice and non-human primates (Hoggatt, Cell 2018; Goncalves, Blood 2018). Based on these data, Magenta initiated a Phase 1 dose-escalating study to evaluate the safety, PK and PD of MGTA-145 as a single agent and in combination with plerixafor. Methods This study consists of four parts. In Part A, healthy volunteers were dosed with MGTA-145 (0.0075 - 0.3 mg/kg) or placebo. In Part B, MGTA-145 dose levels from Part A were selected for use in combination with a clinically approved dose of plerixafor. In Part C, a single dose MGTA-145 plus plerixafor will be administered on day 1 and day 2. In Part D, MGTA-145 plus plerixafor will be administered followed by apheresis. Results MGTA-145 monotherapy was well tolerated in all subjects dosed (Table 1) with no significant adverse events. Some subjects experienced mild (Grade 1) transient lower back pain that dissipated within minutes. In the ongoing study, the combination of MGTA-145 with plerixafor was well tolerated, with some donors experiencing Grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal adverse events commonly observed with plerixafor alone. Pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and maximum plasma concentrations increased dose proportionally and were not affected by plerixafor (Fig 1A). Monotherapy of MGTA-145 resulted in an immediate increase in neutrophils (Fig 1B) and release of plasma MMP-9 (Fig 1C). Neutrophil mobilization plateaued within 1-hour post MGTA-145 at doses greater than 0.03 mg/kg. This plateau was followed by a rebound of neutrophil mobilization which correlated with re-expression of CXCR2 and presence of MGTA-145 at pharmacologically active levels. Markers of neutrophil activation were relatively unchanged (<2-fold vs baseline). A rapid and statistically significant increase in CD34+ cells occurred @ 0.03 and 0.075 mg/kg of MGTA-145 (p < 0.01) relative to placebo with peak mobilization (Fig 1D) 30 minutes post MGTA-145 (7-fold above baseline @ 0.03 mg/kg). To date, the combination of MGTA-145 plus plerixafor mobilized >20/µl CD34s in 92% (11/12) subjects compared to 50% (2/4) subjects receiving plerixafor alone. Preliminary data show that there was a significant increase in fold change relative to baseline in CD34+ cells (27x vs 13x) and phenotypic CD34+CD90+CD45RA- HSCs (38x vs 22x) mobilized by MGTA-145 with plerixafor. Mobilized CD34+ cells were detectable at 15 minutes with peak mobilization shifted 2 - 4 hours earlier for the combination vs plerixafor alone (4 - 6h vs 8 - 12h). Detailed results of single dose administration of MGTA-145 and plerixafor given on one day as well as also on two sequential days will be presented along with fully characterized graft analysis post apheresis from subjects given MGTA-145 and plerixafor. Conclusions MGTA-145 is safe and well tolerated, as a monotherapy and in combination with plerixafor and induced rapid and robust mobilization of significant numbers of HSCs with a single dose in all subjects to date. Kinetics of CD34+ cell mobilization for the combination was immediate (4x increase vs no change for plerixafor alone @ 15 min) suggesting the mechanism of action of MGTA-145 plus plerixafor is different from plerixafor alone. Preliminary data demonstrate that MGTA-145 when combined with plerixafor results in a significant increase in CD34+ fold change relative to plerixafor alone. Magenta Therapeutics intends to develop MGTA-145 as a first line mobilization product for blood cancers, autoimmune and genetic diseases and plans a Phase 2 study in multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 2020. Disclosures DiPersio: Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Cellworks Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; RiverVest Venture Partners Arch Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; WUGEN: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bioline Rx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hoggatt:Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Devine:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Protocol development (via institution); Bristol Myers: Other: Grant for monitoring support & travel support; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Travel support for advisory board; My employer (National Marrow Donor Program) has equity interest in Magenta. Biernat:Medpace, Inc.: Employment. Howell:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schmelmer:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Neale:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boitano:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Cooke:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Goncalves:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Raffel:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Falahee:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Morrow:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Davis:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document