scholarly journals Screening for Occult Malignancy Following First Unprovoked VTE: A Single Centre Experience

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3550-3550
Author(s):  
Ruochen Li ◽  
Cara Doyle ◽  
Lara N Roberts ◽  
Kathryn Jane Lang ◽  
Emma Gee ◽  
...  

Abstract There are clearly demonstrated links between unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) and underlying malignancy. Previous studies have shown an incidence between 3 and 13% of subsequent cancer diagnoses in patients with unprovoked VTE. National guidance issued in the United Kingdom, 2012 recommend that all patients with a first unprovoked VTE are investigated for occult malignancy with a thorough history and examination, full blood count, liver function tests, calcium, chest X-ray and urinalysis with directed investigation of any positive findings. Additionally, abdomino-pelvic CT scans (and mammography in women) should be considered for all patients over 40 years with first unprovoked VTE without positive findings on basic investigations. We retrospectively reviewed all patients diagnosed with unprovoked VTE at King's College Hospital between April 2014 and March 2015, and results were followed up to July 2015. We excluded as provoked VTEs all cases associated with trauma, known malignancy, recent surgery or hospitalisation, prolonged immobilisation, long-haul travel, hormonal therapy, intravenous drug use, pregnancy or the puerperium. We examined extent of investigations performed and reviewed the incidence of occult malignancy in those with a first unprovoked VTE. Over the period of study, 544 patients were objectively diagnosed with pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Of these, 140 cases were unprovoked in nature. 75/140 (53.6%) were male, with a median age of 56 years (range 22-97). All 140 patients had initial clinical assessment and bloods tests. 113 (80.7%) patients also had chest X-ray screening performed. Of the remaining 27 patients, 4 were not followed up in our centre. 75 (53.6%) patients had tumour markers taken, 74 (52.9%) patients had abdominal imaging (of which 61, 82.4% had CT abdomen and pelvis, remainder ultrasound) and 3 women had mammography. Tumour markers were abnormal in 26/75 (34.7%). Abdominal imaging was abnormal in 33/66 (50.0%) patients without a subsequent diagnosis of malignancy, with 18/66 (27.3%) requiring additional investigation to definitively exclude malignancy. 8/136 (5.9%) cases of occult malignancy were identified (see Table for characteristics). The majority of patients found to have occult malignancy were diagnosed at an advanced stage, with high subsequent mortality rates and minimal opportunity for intervention. Our findings compare favourably with the findings of the SOME trial with a low incidence of occult malignancy and questionable value of routine abdomino-pelvic imaging for otherwise asymptomatic patients with first unprovoked VTE. Such screening is likely to incur anxiety for patients, incidental findings and higher costs without demonstrable patient benefit. Abnormal tumour markers were common and non-specific and should not be performed routinely following unprovoked VTE. Targeted investigation for individuals with suggestive clinical features or abnormalities on baseline bloods, chest X-ray or urinalysis should be considered. Table 1. Characteristics of patients identified with occult malignancy, time to cancer diagnosis, staging of cancer, treatment received, and mortality Cancer Age/Gender VTE Abnormal basic screen# Tumour markers Time to cancer diagnosis (days) Stage/treatment Time to death* (days) Endometrial 52F Distal DVT No Not done 131 T1aM0N0 ¨C surgery (TAH + BSO) N/A Endometrial 57F Distal DVT Yes CA125 3383 0 No formal staging, metastatic disease, no treatment 45 Pancreatic 52M Proximal DVT Yes CA125 2832 17 No formal staging, metastatic disease, no treatment 19 Pancreatic 57M PE Yes CA125 583, CEA 96 20 No formal staging, metastatic disease, no treatment 65 Lung 85F PE Yes Not done 85 T3N1M1a ¨C chemotherapy N/A Lung 81M PE Yes Not done 0 T4N3M1b ¨C for palliation only 49 Ovarian 69F PE Yes CA125 1224, CEA 6 0 No formal staging, metastatic disease, no treatment 16 Unknown primary 97F Proximal DVT Yes AFP 29, CEA 626, CA125 316 1 No formal staging, metastatic disease, for palliation 6 #basic screen includes clinical assessment, renal/liver function, calcium, chest X-ray and urinalysis; *from time of VTE diagnosis Disclosures Arya: Bayer plc: Research Funding.

Author(s):  
Tim Raine ◽  
George Collins ◽  
Catriona Hall ◽  
Nina Hjelde ◽  
James Dawson ◽  
...  

This chapter explores interpreting results, including blood tests, full blood count (FBC), clotting, cardiac markers, inflammatory response, urea and electrolytes (U+E), liver function tests (LFT) and amylase, calcium and phosphate, endocrine tests, cardiology, electrocardiogram (ECG), respiratory, chest X-ray (CXR), arterial blood gases (ABGs), respiratory function tests, gastrointestinal, abdomen X-ray (AXR), urine tests, neurological, CSF, musculoskeletal, autoantibodies and associated diseases, cervical spine radiographs, and skeletal radiographs.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 411-412
Author(s):  
Nicola Sverzellati ◽  
Gianluca Milanese ◽  
Mario Silva

Both the detection and interpretation of focal abnormalities on chest X-ray (CXR) are challenging tasks. CXR accuracy depends on the view (e.g. the supine view has limited sensitivity) and technological equipment. The detection of small focal abnormalities (e.g. lung nodules) varies between anatomical regions according to the presence of dense anatomic structures, such as the bones and the hila. The interpretation of focal abnormalities on CXR is paramount within the whole clinical assessment, because CXR findings can guide the patient’s management, or warrant further investigations, such as computed tomography. Focal lung abnormalities on CXR are still a cornerstone of diagnostic algorithms; however, the radiological approach has progressively changed in the last decade because of the progressive development of both hardware and software applications that enable sensitive detection and accurate characterization.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (20) ◽  
pp. 3307-3315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hardeep Singh ◽  
Kamal Hirani ◽  
Himabindu Kadiyala ◽  
Olga Rudomiotov ◽  
Traber Davis ◽  
...  

Purpose Understanding delays in cancer diagnosis requires detailed information about timely recognition and follow-up of signs and symptoms. This information has been difficult to ascertain from paper-based records. We used an integrated electronic health record (EHR) to identify characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis of lung cancer. Methods Using a retrospective cohort design, we evaluated 587 patients of primary lung cancer at two tertiary care facilities. Two physicians independently reviewed each case, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Type I missed opportunities were defined as failure to recognize predefined clinical clues (ie, no documented follow-up) within 7 days. Type II missed opportunities were defined as failure to complete a requested follow-up action within 30 days. Results Reviewers identified missed opportunities in 222 (37.8%) of 587 patients. Median time to diagnosis in cases with and without missed opportunities was 132 days and 19 days, respectively (P < .001). Abnormal chest x-ray was the clue most frequently associated with type I missed opportunities (62%). Follow-up on abnormal chest x-ray (odds ratio [OR], 2.07; 95% CI, 1.04 to 4.13) and completion of first needle biopsy (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.76 to 5.18) were associated with type II missed opportunities. Patient adherence contributed to 44% of patients with missed opportunities. Conclusion Preventable delays in lung cancer diagnosis arose mostly from failure to recognize documented abnormal imaging results and failure to complete key diagnostic procedures in a timely manner. Potential solutions include EHR-based strategies to improve recognition of abnormal imaging and track patients with suspected cancers.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
G L Oktar ◽  
E G Ergul ◽  
U Kiziltepe

Background: The study was designed to analyse the risk indicators for a possible underlying malignancy and to evaluate whether extensive cancer screening is necessary in all patients with venous thromboembolism or not. Methods: In total, 126 patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis, and 121 patients with secondary deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity and without a known malignancy were studied. A diagnostic screening workup including a clinical history, physical examination, complete blood count, blood sedimentation rate, basic biochemistry panel including hepatic and renal function tests, prostate-specific antigen, a chest X-ray and an abdominopelvic ultrasonography was performed for all patients. Results: Suspicious findings suggesting an underlying cancer, previous history of venous thromboembolism, bilateral venous thrombosis and associated thrombosis in unusual sites were significantly more common in patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis. A malignancy was detected in 10 of the 126 patients (7.9%) without a known risk factor for deep venous thrombosis. During the follow-up period, a diagnosis of malignancy was established in two patients in the same group. Conclusion: The risk of an underlying malignancy in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism is significantly higher. A moderate screening strategy has the capacity to identify the majority of the malignancies in such patients. We advocate simple laboratory tests, a chest X-ray and an abdominopelvic ultrasonography in order to search for an occult malignancy. A more extensive screening strategy may be considered for patients with suspicious findings for cancer, recurrent or bilateral venous thromboembolism and associated thrombosis in unusual sites.


2020 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2020-138029
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Jane Eggleton

Coronavirus disease 2019 has caused a global pandemic. The majority of patients will experience mild disease, but others will develop a severe respiratory infection that requires hospitalisation. This is causing a significant strain on health services. Patients are presenting at emergency departments with symptoms of dyspnoea, dry cough and fever with varying severity. The appropriate triaging of patients will assist in preventing health services becoming overwhelmed during the pandemic. This is assisted through clinical assessment and various imaging and laboratory investigations, including chest X-ray, blood analysis and identification of viral infection with SARS-CoV-2. Here, a succinct triaging pathway that aims to be fast, reliable and affordable is presented. The hope is that such a pathway will assist health services in appropriately combating the pandemic.


2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. A878.2-A879
Author(s):  
Steve Goodacre ◽  
Kimberley Horspool ◽  
Catherine Nelson-piercy ◽  
Marian Knight ◽  
Neil Shephard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document