Early Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Use of Asparaginase during Induction Chemotherapy Appear to Improve Otherwise Poor Outcomes in Adult T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma (T-ALL/T-LBL) Patients: A Multi-Institutional Review

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4869-4869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uma Borate ◽  
Amanda Redden Hathaway ◽  
Deniz Peker ◽  
Bradford E Jackson ◽  
Vamsi K Kota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Regimen ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Institutional Review

Abstract Background: AdultT-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/T-LBL) is a rare, aggressive bone marrow malignancy with a historically poor prognosis despite use of various chemotherapies. Methods: After institutional review board approval, we compiled a database of all adult T-ALL/T-LBL cases at three large cancer centers between the years 2005-2015, treated at the physician's discretion. Data collected included patient demographics, tumor characteristics (white cell count at diagnosis, blast phenotype, FISH, cytogenetics, bone marrow involvement), treatment regimens and patient outcomes. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined looking at medians and interquartile ranges of times to events. Kaplan Meier curves provided a graphical representation of the survival probability. Moreover, we provided estimates of the 50th percentile along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also used Univariate and Multivariable Cox Regression to estimate unadjusted and adjusted Hazard Ratios (HRs) and their 95% CIs. Stratified analysis was also performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test to compare median survival times, and the Log-rank to compare survival curses for RFS and OS. Results: The final analysis included 95 adult patients. Median age at diagnosis was 32 (range 17-75). 71.6% of patients were male. 49.5% of patients were white, 14.7% were black, 6.3% were Hispanic, 7.4% were Asian and in 22.1% of patients the race was unknown. Multiple frontline treatment regimens were used with 60% of patients treated with Hyper-CVAD, an additional 5.3% of patients received Hyper-CVAD with asparaginase, 24.2% of patients were treated on a pediatric-based protocol, 4.2% on a clinical trial, and 6.3% received other regimens. In total, 40 patients (42.1%) received asparaginase at some point during treatment regimen with 27 patients (28.4%) receiving it in the initial treatment regimen. After induction therapy, 65 patients (68.4%) achieved remission. Twenty-eight patients (29.5%) underwent transplant (8 matched-related donors, 10 matched unrelated donors, 5 mismatched unrelated donor, 2 cord transplants, 2 autologous, and 1 haplo-identical transplant). Ten patients (10.5%) underwent transplant in first complete remission (CR1) while two patients (2.1%) proceeded to transplant with minimal residual disease following induction. Despite therapy, 59 patients (62.1%) had known disease relapse or progressive disease. 16 patients (16.8%) underwent transplant after disease relapse. At time of analysis, 57 patients (60.6%) died. In the entire cohort, median RFS was 12.9 months and median OS was 19 months. In patients with a very high white count (>100 x 103/cmm at presentation) there was a trend toward earlier relapse when compared to patients presenting with white counts in the normal range (HR 2.27, p-value 0.085). Patients who received asparaginase in their initial treatment regimen have statistically improved RFS (HR 2.65, p-value = 0.014) and OS (HR 2.3, p-value=0.017). When adjusting for the presence of the covariates of age, sex, and WBC, patients who received initial asparaginase still had significant improvement in RFS (HR 3.18, p-value 0.033). In overall survival, significant benefit was seen in the addition of asparaginase in patients under 40 (HR 3.4, CI 1.22-9.5), however in patients greater than 40, asparaginase use seemed to decrease survival (HR 0.24, CI 0.03-1), although this did not reach statistical significance. All patients who underwent transplant had an improvement in OS, with median survival in the transplant group of 27 months compared to 18.2 months in the non-transplanted patients (log-rank test p-value = 0.048). Patients who received a transplant in CR1 had a trend towards improvement in RFS of 6.3 months (17.8 months versus 11.5 months in non-transplanted patients; log-rank test p-value = 0.03). Conclusion: Overall, adult T-ALL/T-LBL has a poor prognosis. Our multi-institutional retrospective review showed that OS and RFS may be improved by incorporating asparaginase use in front line therapy and by transplanting patients in first CR. Our data is limited in that actual dosing of asparaginase was not examined and that relatively few patients > 40 yrs old received asparaginase (4 pts) or SCT (5 pts). More prospective studies are needed in older adult T-ALL/LBL patients using these approaches to possibly improve their outcomes. Disclosures Borate: Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Genoptix: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Hathaway:OnQ Health: Research Funding. Kota:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding. Shah:DeBartolo Institute for Personlaized Medicine: Research Funding; Rosetta Genomics: Research Funding; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, INC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Plexus Communications: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Spectrum: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; SWOG: Consultancy; NCCN: Consultancy. Jillella:Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding. Heffner:Amgen: Consultancy. Erba:Novartis; Incyte; Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; GlycoMimetics; Janssen: Other: Data Safety & Monitoring Committees; Seattle Genetics; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda; Celator; Astellas: Research Funding; Sunesis;Pfizer; Daiichi Sankyo; Ariad: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Poor Outcomes with Hyper CVAD Induction for T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3762-3762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vamsi K Kota ◽  
Amanda Redden Hathaway ◽  
Bijal D. Shah ◽  
Deniz Peker ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Genetics Research

Abstract Background: T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) in adults is an aggressive bone marrow malignancy that historically has a poor prognosis. Hyper-CVAD/methotrexate-cytarabine (hyper CVAD) regimen is a commonly used induction regimen following the protocol developed at MD Anderson Cancer center. Recent reports from Swedish Cancer Registry showed that relapse rates were much higher than expected with this regimen. We report our retrospective experiences across three different centers, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University (Atlanta), University of Alabama Cancer Center (Birmingham) and Moffitt Cancer Center, (Tampa), with the use of this regimen for management of T-ALL/LBL. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all adult T-ALL/T-LBL cases at three large cancer centers between the years 2005-2015, treated at the physician's discretion. Data collected included patient demographics, tumor characteristics (white count at diagnosis, flow cytometry, FISH, cytogenetics, bone marrow involvement), treatment regimens and patient outcomes. Since hyper CVAD is a commonly used regimen outside of clinical trials, we focused our analysis on outcomes with this regimen. This regimen consisted of 4 courses of hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine [VCR], doxorubicin, dexamethasone; the odd courses 1, 3, 5, 7); and 4 courses of MTX-Ara-C (methotrexate-cytarabine; the even courses 2, 4, 6, 8). CNS prophylaxis was given to all patients as per standard of care recommendations. All patients eligible for maintenance received 2 years of POMP (6 mercaptopurine, methotrexate, vincristine and prednisone) maintenance. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined looking at medians and interquartile ranges of times to events. Kaplan Meier curves provided a graphical representation of the survival probability. Results: The final analysis included 95 adult patients with 64/95 (67%) patients receiving hyper-CVAD induction. Among the hyper-CVAD patients the median age at diagnosis was 30 (range 17-74). 71% of patients were male. Median white cell count (WBC) was 13.6/mm3 (1.7-500). Cytogenetic analysis revealed diploid in 36, complex (1 or more abnormalities in 16) and was not available in 12. WBC count was > 100,000/mm3 in 9 patients. 14 patients had mediastinal disease while 7 had CNS disease at diagnosis. Hyper-CVAD was the primary induction regimen in 56/64. Other patients either started on non-hyper CVAD induction prior to switching (n=3) or had asparaginase added to induction (n=5). The median number of cycles given as 7 (range 2-10) with 27(45%) patients receiving the planned 8 cycles. 37 patients did not complete 8 cycles due to stem cell transplant in remission (n=12), progressive disease (n=10) and unclear reasons (n=15). After induction therapy, remission status was unknown in 3 patients while 43/61 patients (70%) achieved remission. Maintenance with POMP was started in 21 patients that were in remission while 12 patients were taken to transplant without starting on maintenance. At the time of analysis, 23/64 (35%) patients are alive. The median relapse free survival was 387 days (12.9 months) and the median overall survival was 536 days (17.6 months). Excluding one patient lost to follow up, 44/63 (69.8%) relapsed. There was no difference in relapse versus non relapse patients in terms of median age (30 vs 33 years), median WBC at diagnosis (13.2 vs 13.6 mm3). Relapse rate was lower in patients with diploid karyotype (22/36, 61%) as compared to those with complex karyotype (14/16). Median survival in patients post relapse was 150 days. Only 9 patients were able to go for transplant after relapse with post transplant survival also being low (6 deaths). For the entire group, the two year survival was 35%. Conclusion: Our multi-institutional retrospective review shows that outcomes are poor across various centers in patients outside of clinical trials. This is the largest reported series of patients with adult T-ALL/T-LBL treated with hyper-CVAD outside of clinical trials. This data warrants investigation with newer agents to improve outcomes in this disease. Figure 1. Relapse free survival and overall survival in patients treated with hyper-CVAD (n=64) Figure 1. Relapse free survival and overall survival in patients treated with hyper-CVAD (n=64) Disclosures Kota: Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hathaway:OnQ Health: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PLexus Communications: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; Rosetta Genomics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Jillella:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Borate:Genoptix: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Amino Acid Stress Response Genes Promote L-Asparaginase Resistance in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3304-3304
Author(s):  
Daniel Ferguson ◽  
J. Robert McCorkle ◽  
Qian Dong ◽  
Erik Bonten ◽  
Wenjian Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Acid Stress ◽  
Leukemia Cells ◽  
P Value ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Primary Leukemia

Abstract Understanding the genomic and epigenetic mechanisms of drug resistance in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is critical for further improvements in treatment outcome. The role of transcriptomic response in conferring resistance to l-asparaginase (LASP) is poorly understood, beyond asparagine synthetase (ASNS). We defined reproducible LASP response genes in LASP resistant and sensitive ALL cell lines (n = 7) as well as primary leukemia samples from newly diagnosed patients. We identified 2219 response genes (absolute log 2FC > 1.5, FDR p-value <0.05) with ~16.5% being reproduced in more than one cell line. Defining target genes of the amino acid stress response related transcription factor ATF4 in ALL cell lines using ChIP-seq revealed 25% of genes that changed expression after LASP treatment were direct targets of the ATF4 transcription factor. A total of 17,117 significantly differentially bound ATF4 sites were identified (FDR p-value <0.01) and 97.8% of these sites displayed an increase in ATF4 binding following LASP treatment. SLC7A11 was found to be a response gene in cell lines and patient samples as well as a direct target of ATF4. SLC7A11 was also one of only 2.4% of response genes with basal level gene expression that also correlated with LASP ex vivo resistance in primary leukemia cells from 212 newly diagnosed children enrolled on St. Jude Total Therapy 16. Experiments using chemical inhibition of SLC7A11 with sulfasalazine, gene overexpression, and partial gene knockout recapitulated LASP resistance or sensitivity in ALL cell lines. These findings show the importance of assessing changes in gene expression following treatment with an antileukemic agent for its association with drug resistance and highlights that many response genes may not differ in their basal expression in drug resistant leukemia cells. Disclosures Stock: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; amgen: Honoraria; agios: Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; kura: Honoraria; kite: Honoraria; morphosys: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pluristeem: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mullighan: Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Illumina: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Pui: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Data Monitoring Committee. Evans: Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Scientific Advisory Board, Chair: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioSkryb, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Emeritus Member (began Jan 2021): Ended employment in the past 24 months.

Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients (Pts) with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma without an Intent for Immediate Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT): Results of the Randomized Phase III Trial SWOG S0777

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 25-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Durie ◽  
Antje Hoering ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Muneer H. Abidi ◽  
Joshua Epstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Lenalidomide with dexamethasone (Rd) is a standard of care for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. SWOG S0777, a randomized phase III trial, has compared Rd with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd). The primary end point is progression-free survival (PFS) using a pre-specified one-sided stratified log rank test at a significance level of 0.02. The stratification factors are International Staging System (ISS) stage (I, II or III) and intent to transplant (yes or no), a total of 6 strata. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety are secondary end points. Methods: This analysis includes 474 patients evaluable for survival endpoints: 232 patients were randomized to Rd and 242 patients to VRd. Rd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. VRd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-14 and dexamethasone 20/mg/day on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV push on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. All patients received aspirin 325 mg/day and VRd patients received HSV prophylaxis per institutional standard. Induction was six 28-day cycles of Rd and eight 21-day cycles of VRd followed by Rd maintenance for all patients until progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Initial analyses utilized the pre-specified one-sided stratified log rank test. Results: Data are presented for VRd followed by Rd throughout. Between 2008 and 2012, 525 patients from 48 institutions were randomized. Fifty-one patients, 29 randomized to Rd and 22 randomized to RVd, were ineligible for the following reasons: missing, insufficient or early or late baseline labs (40); not meeting requirements of measurable disease (6); inadequate marrow function (1); inadequate creatinine clearance (1); prior malignancy (1); prior therapy (1); and more than 2 weeks of prior steroid therapy (1). The pre-specified significance level of 0.02 was reached in the log rank testing. The stratified hazard ratio (HR) was 0.742 (96% Wald confidence interval: 0.579, 0.951), and the one-sided stratified log rank p-value for PFS (VRd vs. Rd) was 0.0066. The OS was improved for VRd vs. Rd with HR = 0.666; two-sided log-rank p-value = 0.0114. The PFS and OS survival charts are displayed below. Median PFS was 43 months (VRd) versus 31 months (Rd). Median OS was not reached (VRd) versus 63 months (Rd). Patient characteristics were well-matched between VRd and Rd with the exception of fewer women (37% vs. 47%: P = 0.033) and fewer older patients (≥ 65 years 38% vs. 48%: P = 0.042) receiving VRd. With univariate Cox regression analysis correlates of better PFS/OS were: use of VRd (HR 0.72/0.65; P = 0.006); hemogoblin ≥10 g/dl (HR 1.17/1.43; P = 0.2/0.026) and lower ISS disease stage (HR 1.35/1.98; P = 0.014/< 0.001). The ORR for VRd was 71.07% versus 63.79% for Rd. The adverse events by CTC category and toxicity category were fairly well balanced. The most common hematologic adverse events (≥ Grade 3 and at least possibly attributable to therapy) were low hemoglobin (RVd=13%; Rd=16%), leukopenia (RVd=14%; Rd=16%), lymphopenia (RVd=23%; Rd=18%), neutropenia (RVd=19%; Rd=21%), and thrombocytopenia (RVd=18%; Rd=14%). The most common non-hematologic adverse events (≥ Grade 3 and at least possibly attributable to therapy) were: fatigue (RVd=16%; Rd=14%), sensory neuropathy (RVd=23%; Rd=3%), hyperglycemia (RVd=7%; Rd=11%), thrombosis/embolism (RVd=8%; Rd=9%), hypokalemia (RVd=9%; Rd=6%), muscle weakness (RVd=7%; Rd=4%), diarrhea (RVd=8%; Rd=2%), and dehydration (RVd=8%; Rd=2%). As expected ≥ Grade 3 neuropathy was more frequent with VRd (24% vs. 5%: P < 0.0001). Sixteen patients experienced a second primary malignancy, 7 (3%) on VRd and 9 (4%) on Rd. Conclusion: The addition of bortezomib to lenalidomide dexamethasone for induction therapy in previously untreated myeloma results in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS as well as better OS. VRd had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile despite increased neurotoxicity and represents a potential new standard of care. Support: NIH/NCI/NCTN grants CA180888, CA180819, CA180821, CA180820; and in part by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., The Takeda Oncology Company, for provision of study drug. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Durie: Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Abidi:Millennium: Research Funding. Epstein:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Reu:Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Orlowski:BioTheryX, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Barlogie:Dana Farber Cancer Institute: Other: Travel Stipend; International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Other: Travel Stipend; ComtecMed- World Congress on Controversies in Hematology: Other: Travel Stipend; European School of Haematology- International Conference on Multiple Myeloma: Other: Travel Stipend; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Myeloma Health, LLC: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor of patents and patent applications related to use of GEP in cancer medicine licensed to Myeloma Health, LLC; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Other: Travel Stipend.

scholarly journals Risk Factors Affecting Outcome of Transplantation in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of the International BFM ALL SCT Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2015-2015
Author(s):  
Adriana Balduzzi ◽  
Jean-Hugues Dalle ◽  
Arjan C Lankester ◽  
Isaac Yaniv ◽  
Akif Yesilipek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Donor Type

Abstract BACKGROUND. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is of benefit in pediatric patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first or further remission. Whether transplantation from unrelated donors could yield similar results to transplantation from HLA identical siblings is still to be assessed within countries running different frontline and relapse protocols. AIM OF THE STUDY. A prospective study was initiated within the International BFM Study Group, in order to assess whether the outcome of HSCT from a 9 or 10 out of 10 HLA allelic matched compatible donor (MD) was inferior to the outcome of HSCT from a matched sibling donor (MSD) in children or young adults with ALL carrying very high risk eligibility criteria for transplantation. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) and secondary endpoints were non-relapse mortality (NRM) and incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD, cGVHD). PATIENTS AND METHODS. Between 2007 and 2013, 10 countries (Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Israel, Italy, The Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, Slovakia, Turkey) participated into the ALL SCT I-BFM Study, coordinated by Peters in Vienna. 298 consecutive patients, 18 years old or younger (70% male, median age 9 years), affected with VHR ALL in complete remission (CR), were enrolled in the core arm of the Study (MD vs MSD). Of 298, 107 patients were transplanted from a MSD (50% in CR1, 47% in CR2, 4% >CR2) and 191 from a MD (44% in CR1, 48% CR2, 9% >CR2), either related (5%) or unrelated (95%), at a median of 189 and 197 days, respectively, after diagnosis/relapse. As per protocol, conditioning regimen consisted of TBI-etoposide, in patients older than 2 years, or busulfan-cyclophosphamide-melphalan, in patients 2 years or younger, and GVHD-prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine (CSA) only for MSD and CSA/methotrexate/ATG for MD recipients. Median follow-up for alive patients was 3.1 years. RESULTS. Three-year EFS was 67% (SE 5%) for MSD vs 61% (SE 4%) for MD recipients (p-value 0.254), overall survival (OS) 76% (SE 4%) vs 69% (SE 4%) (p-value 0.207), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) 24% (SE 4%) vs 22% (SE 3%) (p-value 0.935) and NRM 8% (SE 3%) vs 16% (SE 3%) (p-value 0.094), respectively. There was a trend for a higher risk NRM for MD patients, although no statistical significance was reached (HR 1.94, CI 0.85-4.41; p=0.114), after adjusting for risk profile and donor type. Being transplanted in CR2 was associated with lower EFS and higher NRM (p=0.001). Grade II-IV acute GVHD occurred in 37% and grade III-IV in 16% of MSD vs 42% and 15% of MD recipients; 39% of the evaluable MSD and 19% of the MD recipients experienced chronic GVHD, which was severe in 24% and 10%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of developing chronic GVHD was 39% (SE 5%) and 17% (SE 3%), for patients grafted from MSD and MD, respectively (p=0.001). Being transplanted from a MD, compared with a MSD, was significantly associated with a reduced risk of developing chronic GVHD (HR 0.31, CI 0.18-0.54, p <0.001), despite a similar risk of relapse (HR 0.81, CI 0.47-1.39; p=0.440). Acute GVHD grade 3 or 4 had statistically significant impact on NRM (HR 4.76, CI 2.33-9.74; <0.001) and OS (HR 1.97, CI 1.14-3.42; p=0.016), after adjusting for risk profile and donor type. CONCLUSIONS. Outcome of transplantation of MD pediatric recipients with VHR ALL in CR was not inferior to the outcome of MSD recipients in terms of EFS, OS, and CIR, with probability of chronic GVHD being lower for MD versus MSD recipients, which suggests the crucial role of serotherapy, and severe acute GVHD being associated with increased NRM and lower OS but similar CIR. Disclosures Dalle: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Macopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peters:Medac: Research Funding; Fresenius: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sanovi: Research Funding; Pierre-Fabre: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Analyzing Patient Characteristics Who Received (DA) EPOCH-R for High Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4208-4208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin A. Simar ◽  
Vishwanath Sathyanarayanan ◽  
Amir K Issa ◽  
Mohamed Amin Ahmed ◽  
Mansoor Noorani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Neutropenic Fever ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
P Value ◽  
Outpatient Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background: Due to ~50% risk of relapse with standard therapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone, R-CHOP), an increasing number of patients with high risk diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are being treated with dose-adjusted (DA) EPOCH-R (rituximab, etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, cyclophosphamide). DA-EPOCH-R contains a 96-hour continuous infusion can be delivered either in the inpatient or outpatient setting, via use of ambulatory infusion pumps. Potential advantages of outpatient therapy include reduced inpatient burden for routine chemotherapy, less exposure to resistant bacterial infections, increased patient satisfaction, and reduced cost. The ability to administer outpatient DA-EPOCH-R is dependent on the ability of the healthcare facility to administer the regimen safely while maintaining dose adjustments and schedule. We hypothesize that patients who receive DA-EPOCH-R as an outpatient have similar outcomes and toxicity rates as patients who receive the regimen as an inpatient. We further hypothesize that there is a significant cost benefit for patients to receive DA-EPOCH-R as an outpatient. Methods: This was a retrospective database analysis of newly diagnosed consecutive DLBCL patients ≥ 18 years of age who received DA-EPOCH-R chemotherapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2010 and 2014. Patients with double hit lymphoma defined as having a MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 translocation were excluded due to their aggressive nature. We descriptively analyzed demographic variables in this population including, age, gender, international prognostic index (IPI)) and outcome (overall response rates (ORR), complete response (CR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and hospital admission for neutropenic fever events). Additionally, we evaluated the number of outpatient cycles received in relation to survival outcomes and neutropenic fever events. Statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test or Chi-square test to evaluate the association between two categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to evaluate the difference in a continuous variable between patient groups. Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analysis including overall survival and progression free survival. The Log-rank test was used to evaluate the difference in time-to-event endpoints between patient groups. Results: A total of 196 patients had data available for analysis, with 138 patients (70.4%) receiving all cycles as an inpatient, while 58 patients (29.6%) received at least 1 outpatient cycle of DA-EPOCH-R (Table 1). Compared with patients who received no outpatient cycle, the patients who received any outpatient therapy were younger, had a lower proportion of high IPI, and experienced fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia. The median OS and PFS for the entire population has not been reached, with a median follow-up time for the censored observations of 2.78 years (range: 0.24 - 8.64 years). The difference in OS between the patients who had any outpatient therapy and no outpatient therapy was not significant by the log-rank test (p-value=0.11). The difference in PFS between the patients who had any outpatient therapy and no outpatient therapy was marginally significant for OS by the log-rank test (p-value=0.07). Our cost analysis for 6 cycles of inpatient DA-EPOCH-R is estimated to be ~$88K, or $14.6K/cycle. The cost savings incurred for chemotherapy only expenses for each outpatient cycle is at least $3.3K/cycle or $19.8K for a total of 6 cycles. Conclusion: DA-EPOCH-R is a highly effective regimen for treating aggressive DLBCL which can be administered in an outpatient setting safely, efficaciously, and in a cost-effective manner without any apparent effect on outcome or rate of admission for neutropenic fever. There can be savings of about of nearly $20K per patient for a 6-cycle course of therapy. In our series, patients who received outpatient therapy were younger and may have had greater social support, which could potentially confound results. This retrospective analysis supports the use of outpatient DA-EPOCH-R, but additional studies are warranted to evaluate which patients may benefit most. Disclosures Oki: Novartis: Research Funding. Nastoupil:Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding. Fowler:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wang:Asana BioSciences: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; BeiGene: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Asana biosciences, Beigene, Celgene, Juno, Kite, Onyx, Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Fayad:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Westin:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ProNAi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals FLT3 Inhibitor Correlative Laboratory Assays Impact Outcomes in KMT2A-Rearranged Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Patients Treated with Lestaurtinib: AALL0631, a Children's Oncology Group Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1293-1293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Brown ◽  
John Kairalla ◽  
Joanne M. Hilden ◽  
Zoann Eckert Dreyer ◽  
Andrew J. Carroll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Negative Rate ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitor

Background/Objectives Infants with ALL have poor outcomes, especially the 70-80% with KMT2A rearrangements (KMT2A-r). Intensification of chemotherapy has reached the limit of tolerability, and stem cell transplantation (SCT) has not improved outcomes. The FLT3 kinase is overexpressed and constitutively activated in KMT2A-r ALL. FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) selectively kill KMT2A-r ALL cells in vitro and in vivo, and synergize with chemotherapy. COG AALL0631 was a randomized trial that tested the hypothesis that the addition of the FLT3i lestaurtinib to post-induction chemotherapy would improve outcomes for KMT2A-r ALL.As previously reported, the addition of lestaurtinib did not improve outcomes [3-year disease-free/overall survival (DFS/OS) 39%/46% without lestaurtinib vs. 37%/45% with lestaurtinib, log-rank p=0.78/0.92]. We hypothesized that correlative laboratory measures of FLT3i pharmacodynamics and ex vivo FLT3i sensitivity would enhance our understanding of the clinical responses for KMT2A-r infants treated with lestaurtinib. Design/Methods FLT3i pharmacodynamics (PD) were determined using plasma inhibitory activity (PIA) measured at 5 trough time points during lestaurtinib treatment, using Western blotting and densitometry (normalized to pre-treatment levels). PIA ranged from 0% (no evidence of FLT3 inhibition) to 100% (full inhibition). Mean PIA of 5 troughs was calculated for each patient, and was categorized based on pre-defined protocol criteria as "adequate", or FLT3 inhibited (≥85%) vs "inadequate", or FLT3 uninhibited (<85%). FLT3i ex-vivo sensitivity (EVS) was determined using WST-1 cell proliferation assay [48 hour cytotoxicity of diagnostic blasts exposed to 50 nM lestaurtinib vs vehicle control; mean of triplicate wells; ranging from 0% (no cytotoxicity) to 100% (all cells killed)]. Median cytotoxicity was calculated for all assayed samples on the trial (n=151; median cytotoxicity 46%). Samples were categorized as "sensitive" (above median) or "resistant" (below median). Clinical outcomes examined included 3-year DFS and OS (measured from randomization) and minimal residual disease (MRD) measured in a central laboratory by flow cytometry at week 10 [after induction (6 weeks) followed by chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy/lestaurtinib intensification (4 weeks)]. MRD results were categorized as negative (<0.01%) or positive (≥0.01%). P-values for DFS and OS comparisons are based on log-rank test, and for MRD comparisons are based on Fisher's exact test. Results Of 210 eligible patients, 146 were KMT2A-r, and 78 were assigned to receive lestaurtinib. Of these, data were available for FLT3i PD (n=73), FLT3i EVS (n=62), MRD (n=55), and DFS/OS (n=78). FLT3i PD and FLT3i EVS significantly correlated with both survival and MRD. For FLT3i PD, 27 were "FLT3 inhibited" and 46 were "FLT3 uninhibited". The DFS/OS for inhibited was 59%/67% vs. 28%/37% for uninhibited (p=0.01/0.02). The week 10 MRD-negative rate was 90% for inhibited vs. 52% for uninhibited (p=0.003). For FLT3i EVS, of the 62 lestaurtinib-treated patients with data, 42 were "sensitive" and 20 were "resistant". The DFS/OS for sensitive was 52%/62% vs. 5%/11% for resistant (p<0.001 for both). The week 10 MRD-negative rate was 78% for sensitive vs. 42% for resistant (p=0.03). We then hypothesized that among patients treated with lestaurtinib, those with both "inhibited" FLT3i PD and "sensitive" FLT3i EVS would have particularly good clinical outcomes. Of 58 patients with data for both assays, 17 were both inhibited and sensitive. This cohort had DFS/OS of 88%/94% and week 10 MRD-negative rate of 100%. The remaining N=41 were uninhibited and/or resistant, and had DFS/OS of 20%/29% (p<0.001 for both, Figure 1 shows DFS) and week 10 MRD-negative rate of 58% (p=0.008). Table 1 summarizes all results. Conclusion While the addition of lestaurtinib to chemotherapy did not improve outcomes, patients achieving potent pharmacodynamic inhibition of FLT3 and those whose leukemia cells were sensitive to ex-vivo FLT3-inhibitor induced cytotoxicity did benefit from the addition of lestaurtinib. Selection of patients with FLT3-sensitive leukemia, real-time intra-patient dose escalation of patients with inadequate pharmacodynamics, and/or using a more potent FLT3 inhibitor may enhance the efficacy of FLT3 inhibition for KMT2A-r infant ALL. Disclosures Raetz: Pfizer: Research Funding. Loh:Medisix Therapeutics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hunger:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz: Honoraria. Borowitz:Beckman Coulter: Honoraria. Small:Pharos I, B & T: Consultancy, Research Funding; InSilico Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Different Clinical Implications of Kinase Domain BCR-ABL1 Variants Detected in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5368-5368
Author(s):  
Ricardo Sanchez ◽  
Rosa Ayala ◽  
Gonzalo Carreño Gomez-Tarragona ◽  
Espino Maria Jose ◽  
Beatriz Cuevas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees

Background: Kinase domain (KD) mutations is a common resistance mechanism, secondary to the tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (ITKs) treatment in the case of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Sanger sequencing is the gold standard technique and already the currently recommended method for BCR-ABL1 KD mutation detection. However, Sanger sequencing has limited sensitivity and cannot firmly identify populations with variant allele frequencies (VAF) < 15-20%. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allow us the screening of mutations in the whole KD with variants with a VAF greater than 1%. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and prognostic implications of CML and Ph-positive ALL patients who have been studied for mutations in BCR-ABL1 by NGS. Methods: Seventy CML and Ph-pos ALL patients have been studied for BCR-ABL1 mutations between years 2015-2017. The study reason was warning or failure according to European Leukemia Net recommendations in the case of CML patients, and diagnostic or relapse in the case of ALL patients. Clinical characteristics of the patients are depicted on Table 1. Categorical variables are described as frequency, and quantitative variables as medians. Contingency tables were used to analyze associations between categorical variables (χ2). Median test was used to compare medians of continuous variables between groups. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between patients using the log-rank test. Results: We have found 37 patients with mutations (51%), the most frequent being p.T315I, p.L248V and p.L387M. 28 out of 59 were found in CML (47%) vs 9 out of 13 (69%) in ALL. Of the 37 patients with mutations, double mutations have been found 10 times (27%). In the 72 analyses performed, 62 mutations were found in total, 41 of them were variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and 21 were well-known mutation. The median levels of BCR-ABL1 (IS) at the time of analysis were 3.00 (0.01-196.18) %. Regarding CML patients, we have found 12 and 16 cases with pathogenic mutations and VUS, respectively. The mean survival for CML and ALL were 75.2 months (CI 95%, 65.7-84.6) and 24.7 months (13.3-36.2), respectively. There are significant differences between the overall survival curves for patients with CML who have mutations in BCR-ABL1 compared to those who have VUS or do not (p-value = 0.024, n=59), suggesting a second role of the VUS variants in the resistance of the patients to the TKI. These two groups have no significant differences in ALL patients (p-value= 0.32, n=13). Overall survival at 10 years from the date of diagnosis is 74% for CML patients with mutations and 90% for CML patients without mutations. Data dropped significantly for ALL patients, but the number of cases is too low. Conclusions: - Mutations have been identified in 47% of CML patients studied in the case of failure or warning and 69% of the patients of ALL at diagnosis or relapse moments. - The identification of pathogenic variants has poor prognosis in patients with CML (p = 0.024), however no differences were observed in ALL. - The identification of VUS is not associated to poor prognosis and these variants could not confer resistance to ITK. Disclosures Sevilla: Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Inventor on patents on lentiviral vectors filled by CIEMAT, CIBERER and F.J.D and may be entitled to receive financial benefits from the licensing of such patents; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rocket: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biotech: Honoraria. Steegmann:Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. García Gutiérrez:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Multi-Institution Review of Adult Early T-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma (ETP-ALL)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3715-3715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bijal D. Shah ◽  
Uma Borate ◽  
Vamsi K Kota ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Deniz Peker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
P Value ◽  
Allogeneic Transplant ◽  
Cell Precursor ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: The Early T-cell precursor (ETP) variant of acute lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia (ALL) is a recognized high risk variant, recognized by the absence of CD1a, with aberrant myeloid antigen expression (CD13, CD33, CD117, and CD34), and frequent absence of CD4 or CD8. Treatment intensification may improve outcome in this subset. We undertook a multi-center retrospective analysis to explore clinical features, treatment exposure, and outcomes in ETP ALL as compared to non-ETP variants. Methods Adult T-ALL/T-LBL cases were compiled from 3 high volume cancer centers between the years 2003-2015. Data collected included patient demographics, tumor characteristics (white count at diagnosis, flow cytometry, FISH, cytogenetics, bone marrow involvement), treatment regimens and patient outcomes. ETP cases were defined as definite (CD1a-/CD8-/myeloid+) or probable (CD1a unk/CD8-/myeloid+, or CD1a-/myeloid+ with CD4+ and/or CD8+). All other cases were defined as non-ETP. Demographic data were compared using independent t-test assuming non-equal variance. OS and PFS were calculated from diagnosis and compared by Kaplan Meier and log-rank testing. Results Among 95 cases, 33 met criteria for definite/probable ETP (35%). OS and PFS data were indistinguishable between these groups (p=0.24, p=0.34), and were subsequently analyzed as a single group. Within the ETP group, no factors were associated with OS, including histology (CD1a+ vs unk, CD3cyt vs CD3sur, CD5dim vs CD5+, CD1a+/13+ vs CD1a+/13-, or CD13, CD33, CD117, CD34, & TdT status), marrow blast burden, peripheral blast burden, white blood cell count (wbc), hemoglobin (hgb), platelet count (plt), cytogenetics/FISH status, chemotherapy choice, or allogeneic transplant (in CR1 or at any time). With regards to PFS, only the inclusion of asparaginase with induction was associated with outcome (p=0.009), while all other covariates failed to show any significance. The ETP group was compared with the non-ETP subset (table 1). ETP were more likely to abuse marijuana, possibly reflecting unrecognized pesticide exposure, and were more likely to abnormalities of chrom 5 & 7. ETP trended towards lower response and higher rate of relapse, with lower PFS. Comparison of OS was not significant, likely related to small numbers (5y OS 37% vs 22%, figure 1). Non-ETP failed to show PFS benefit with frontline asparaginase, otherwise no treatment differences were apparent. Conclusions In this muti-center cohort we were able to identify and characterize ETP cases, confirming poor outcomes. Improvement in PFS among ETP patients treated with frontline asparaginase warrants attention and prospective confirmation. Unfortunately, OS remains poor independent of treatment or receipt of allogeneic transplant, suggesting a critical need remains for development and study novel therapies. Table 1. ETP Non-ETP p-value Median Age 37.45 34.74 0.42 Male 82% 66% 0.89 FamilyHx of Lymph/Leuk 21% 8% 0.112 FamilyHx of Ca 42% 25% 0.09 THC 24% 5% 0.021 P blasts 40% 28% 0.158 >25% M blasts 30% 55% 0.0571 WBC 78.45 76.55 0.948 wbc>100 24% 24% 0.995 Hgb 10.72 11.78 0.148 hgb<12 67% 47% 0.097 plt 151.59 138.66 0.644 Chrom 5/7 40% 7% 0.005 Remission 61% 79% 0.096 Relapse 76% 58% 0.073 OS 27.00 22.00 0.595 PFS 13.00 17.00 0.048 PFS Asp ETP (asp no vs yes) 12 59 0.009 non-ETP (asp no vs yes) 17 15 0.777 Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Shah: Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PLexus Communications: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Rosetta Genomics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Kota:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding. Hathaway:OnQ Health: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Ixazomib Added to Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
Karen K. Ballen ◽  
Kristen E. Stevenson ◽  
Traci M. Blonquist ◽  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Survival Estimate ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Introduction: While progress has been made in the treatment of childhood leukemia, the outlook for patients &gt;60 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor with complete remission rates (CR) of approximately 60% and 3-year survivals (OS) of less than 15%. Intensified treatment in a later CALGB trial showed little improvement with a CR=61% and 5-year OS=6% (Stock, Cancer 2013). Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor, which has shown single agent activity and promising combination activity in pediatric ALL patients (Messinger, Blood 2012). We sought to assess the safety and tolerability, as well as early efficacy of adding ixazomib to a current MGH-DFCI/HCC multi-agent regimen for older adults with ALL. Methods: Patients aged 51 to 75 years of age with newly diagnosed B-ALL and T-ALL were screened for eligibility. Patients with mature ALL (including Burkitt's) were excluded. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL (BCR-ABL1+) were eligible, and dasatinib was added to the chemotherapy on Day 10 for these patients. The chemotherapy treatment schedule from induction through maintenance is outlined in Table 1. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib during induction for these patients, the primary objective of the trial. After consolidation I, patients in complete remission (CR) with a suitable donor were offered a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as per institutional guidelines. Those not going to HSCT continued therapy as noted in the table. Results: There were 19 patients with B-ALL enrolled, none with T-ALL. Among these patients, 7 harbored BCR-ABL1 rearrangements. The median age was 65 years, 74% were male, and 90% had a performance status 0 or 1. The MTD was 2.3 mg of ixazomib, as 2 patients at 3.0 mg developed DLT's: a grade 3 peripheral neuropathy and a grade 5 acute kidney injury (Table 2). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities encountered at any time consisted mainly of grade 4 neutropenia in 13 patients and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 12 patients. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and 5 patients experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Two patients with grade 2 neuropathy did not meet the definition of DLT. Among the 19 patients, 15 (79%, [95% confidence interval (CI), 54-94%]) achieved CR (14) or CRi (1), and 5 patients went on to HSCT. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range, 1-5) for 8 patients remaining alive. The 1-year overall survival estimate was 53% [95% CI, 29-72%], while the 2-year overall survival estimate was 47% [95% CI, 24-67%]. Conclusions: A dose of 2.3 mg of ixazomib in combination with induction chemotherapy among older patients with ALL was well-tolerated and associated with a promising rate of complete remission. Disclosures Amrein: Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Brunner:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fathi:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Blueprint: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: MLN 9708, ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. In this trial it is used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

scholarly journals Pegaspargase Can Safely be Administered in Adults Age 40 and Older with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3816-3816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Daley ◽  
Sridevi Rajeeve ◽  
Charlene C. Kabel ◽  
Jeremy J. Pappacena ◽  
Sarah E. Stump ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Frontline Treatment

Introduction: Asparaginase (ASP) has demonstrated a survival benefit in pediatric patients (pts) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is now part of standard-of-care frontline treatment. As a result, asparaginase preparations have been incorporated into the treatment of adult ALL to improve outcomes. Pegaspargase (PEG-ASP), a modified version of asparaginase with prolonged asparagine depletion, appears to be safe in adults up to age 40 (Stock, et al., Blood, 2019), but is associated with a unique spectrum of toxicities, the risks of which appear to increase with age. Therefore, the safety of PEG-ASP remains a significant concern in older adults w/ ALL. Methods: We conducted a single center retrospective chart review of pts age ≥40 years who received PEG-ASP as part of frontline induction/consolidation or reinduction, between March 2008 and June 2018 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The primary objective was to evaluate the tolerability and toxicity of PEG-ASP based on the incidence and severity of ASP-related toxicities (hypersensitivity reactions, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperbilirubinemia, transaminitis, pancreatitis, hypofibrinogenemia, etc) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Laboratory values recorded were either the peak or the nadir, the more appropriate for toxicity assessment, within a 4-week period following PEG-ASP administration. Secondary objectives were to determine the total number of doses of PEG-ASP administered in comparison to the number of doses intended, and to characterize the rationale for PEG-ASP discontinuation when applicable. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the incidence of PEG-ASP toxicities with respect to pt and treatment characteristics (regimen, age, BMI, gender, Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) vs. Ph-, presence of extramedullary disease, PEG-ASP dose). P values were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: We identified 60 pts with ALL (40 B-ALL and 20 T-ALL) who received at least one dose of PEG-ASP. Nine pts were Ph+. The median pt age at initiation of the treatment was 53, (range, 40 to 80), and 19 pts had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Forty-four pts received treatment for newly diagnosed ALL, and 16 pts for relapsed disease. Table 1 lists pt baseline characteristics. Among the 44 pts with newly diagnosed ALL, 27 pts received PEG-ASP as part of pediatric or pediatric-inspired regimens at doses of 2000 - 2500 units/m2, and 1 pt received a modified dose of 1000 units/m2 due to age. The remaining 16 pts received PEG-ASP at doses of 1000 - 2000 units/m2 for consolidation, per established adult regimens (ALL-2 and L-20; Lamanna, et al., Cancer, 2013). Grade 3/4 ASP-related toxicities with a >10% incidence included: hyperbilirubinemia, transaminitis, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglycemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Frontline treatment regimens in which PEG-ASP was used in consolidation cycles only (ALL-2, L-20) were associated w/ a lower incidence of hyperbilirubinemia (p=0.009) and hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001) compared to those regimens that included PEG-ASP during induction (pediatric/pediatric-inspired regimens) (Table 2). Younger age (40-59 vs. ≥60 years) was associated with a greater risk of hypertriglyceridemia (p<0.001) and higher PEG-ASP dose (≥2000 vs. <2000 units/m2) was associated with a greater risk of hypertriglyceridemia and hypofibrinogenemia (p=0.002 and p=0.025, respectively). Thirty-eight pts (63%) received all intended doses of PEG-ASP. Six pts stopped PEG-ASP to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (5 in CR1, 1 in CR2), and 7 pts stopped for hypersensitivity reactions. Hepatotoxicity was the only ASP-related toxicity that led to PEG-ASP discontinuation occurring in 5 pts (hyperbilirubinemia, N=4; transaminitis, N=1). The total number of intended doses of PEG-ASP based on regimens used was 186, and 112 were administered. Conclusion: PEG-ASP was incorporated into the treatment of 60 adult ALL pts age ≥40, with manageable toxicity. Seven pts discontinued PEG-ASP due to hypersensitivity reactions and 5 discontinued due to hepatotoxicity, but other reported toxicities did not lead to PEG-ASP discontinuation and the majority of the pts completed all intended doses of PEG-ASP. This study suggests that with careful monitoring, PEG-ASP can safely be administered in adults ≥40 years of age. Disclosures Rajeeve: ASH-HONORS Grant: Research Funding. Tallman:UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Oncolyze: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellerant: Research Funding; Tetraphase: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLineRx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KAHR: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Geyer:Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding. Park:Takeda: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document