scholarly journals Different Clinical Implications of Kinase Domain BCR-ABL1 Variants Detected in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5368-5368
Author(s):  
Ricardo Sanchez ◽  
Rosa Ayala ◽  
Gonzalo Carreño Gomez-Tarragona ◽  
Espino Maria Jose ◽  
Beatriz Cuevas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees

Background: Kinase domain (KD) mutations is a common resistance mechanism, secondary to the tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (ITKs) treatment in the case of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Sanger sequencing is the gold standard technique and already the currently recommended method for BCR-ABL1 KD mutation detection. However, Sanger sequencing has limited sensitivity and cannot firmly identify populations with variant allele frequencies (VAF) < 15-20%. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allow us the screening of mutations in the whole KD with variants with a VAF greater than 1%. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and prognostic implications of CML and Ph-positive ALL patients who have been studied for mutations in BCR-ABL1 by NGS. Methods: Seventy CML and Ph-pos ALL patients have been studied for BCR-ABL1 mutations between years 2015-2017. The study reason was warning or failure according to European Leukemia Net recommendations in the case of CML patients, and diagnostic or relapse in the case of ALL patients. Clinical characteristics of the patients are depicted on Table 1. Categorical variables are described as frequency, and quantitative variables as medians. Contingency tables were used to analyze associations between categorical variables (χ2). Median test was used to compare medians of continuous variables between groups. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between patients using the log-rank test. Results: We have found 37 patients with mutations (51%), the most frequent being p.T315I, p.L248V and p.L387M. 28 out of 59 were found in CML (47%) vs 9 out of 13 (69%) in ALL. Of the 37 patients with mutations, double mutations have been found 10 times (27%). In the 72 analyses performed, 62 mutations were found in total, 41 of them were variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and 21 were well-known mutation. The median levels of BCR-ABL1 (IS) at the time of analysis were 3.00 (0.01-196.18) %. Regarding CML patients, we have found 12 and 16 cases with pathogenic mutations and VUS, respectively. The mean survival for CML and ALL were 75.2 months (CI 95%, 65.7-84.6) and 24.7 months (13.3-36.2), respectively. There are significant differences between the overall survival curves for patients with CML who have mutations in BCR-ABL1 compared to those who have VUS or do not (p-value = 0.024, n=59), suggesting a second role of the VUS variants in the resistance of the patients to the TKI. These two groups have no significant differences in ALL patients (p-value= 0.32, n=13). Overall survival at 10 years from the date of diagnosis is 74% for CML patients with mutations and 90% for CML patients without mutations. Data dropped significantly for ALL patients, but the number of cases is too low. Conclusions: - Mutations have been identified in 47% of CML patients studied in the case of failure or warning and 69% of the patients of ALL at diagnosis or relapse moments. - The identification of pathogenic variants has poor prognosis in patients with CML (p = 0.024), however no differences were observed in ALL. - The identification of VUS is not associated to poor prognosis and these variants could not confer resistance to ITK. Disclosures Sevilla: Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Inventor on patents on lentiviral vectors filled by CIEMAT, CIBERER and F.J.D and may be entitled to receive financial benefits from the licensing of such patents; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rocket: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biotech: Honoraria. Steegmann:Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. García Gutiérrez:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodisplasia-Related Changes (AML-MRC) Defined Only By Morphological Findings May Not Represent a Poor Prognosis AML

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2612-2612
Author(s):  
Ana Pérez ◽  
Olga Salamero ◽  
Helena Pomares ◽  
Maria Julia Montoro ◽  
Montserrat Arnan Sangerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Group 1

According to the 2016 WHO classification, AML-MRC encompasses an heterogeneous group of acute myeloid leukemias (AML) comprising: AML emerged from a previous myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myeloproliferative /myelodysplastic disease (group 1), AML with MDS-defining cytogenetic abnormalities (group 2), or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with dysplasia in at least 2 cell lineages without the above mentioned (group 3). In spite that AML-MRC has been considered a high-risk entity with poor prognosis, little is known on the relationship of clinical and biological characteristics with outcomes in these three groups. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and biological characteristics of patients with AML-MRC and analyze their prognostic variables and outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed AML-MRC cases diagnosed between January-2009 and December- 2018 in two institutions. Descriptive variables were studied to compare the three AML-MRC groups. AML cytogenetic risk and response were defined according to the European Leukemia Net recommendations. Overall survival (OS) was considered as the time from the diagnosis to the last visit. Survival analysis were performed with Kaplan Meier method and comparisons with the log-rank test. Among 575 cases of AML identified, 186 (32.3%) met AML-MRC criteria and were included in the study. The main patient characteristics are shown in Table1. Median age was 72 (range, 22-88) years and 32% were female. Adverse karyotype was present in 29% of patients, being more prevalent in the AML-MRC group 2. Sixty one patients (33%) received an intensive chemotherapy approach and 36 (19%) an allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Patients in group 3 exhibit a higher probability of achieving a complete response than groups 1 and 2 (Table 2). After a median follow-up for survivors of 28.5 months (range, 5-130), 149 (80%) died in this period. Three years Overall Survival (OS) for patients in groups 1, 2 and 3 was 3 (0-117), 5 (0-93) and 10 (0-130) months, respectively (p=0.012) (Figure 1). Type of treatment (intensive, non intensive or best supportive care) and cytogenetic risk also showed impact on OS. Multivariant analysis adjusting these factors showed that patients in group 3 also presented better OS than patients in group 1 (HR=0,42 [IC95% 0,18-0,84], p=0,02), both with around a 30% of patients with adverse cytogenetics. To conclude the present study suggests that group 3 of AML-MRC, for which the diagnosis is based solely on morphologic findings, showed better prognosis than the other groups. A more detailed molecular characterization might contribute to improve prognostic stratification of this heterogeneous AML entity, particularly in patients with non-high risk cytogenetics. Disclosures Salamero: Pfizer: Honoraria; Daichii Sankyo: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Valcárcel:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: spouse is an employee in the company, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria. Bosch:AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Ixazomib Added to Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
Karen K. Ballen ◽  
Kristen E. Stevenson ◽  
Traci M. Blonquist ◽  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Survival Estimate ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Introduction: While progress has been made in the treatment of childhood leukemia, the outlook for patients &gt;60 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor with complete remission rates (CR) of approximately 60% and 3-year survivals (OS) of less than 15%. Intensified treatment in a later CALGB trial showed little improvement with a CR=61% and 5-year OS=6% (Stock, Cancer 2013). Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor, which has shown single agent activity and promising combination activity in pediatric ALL patients (Messinger, Blood 2012). We sought to assess the safety and tolerability, as well as early efficacy of adding ixazomib to a current MGH-DFCI/HCC multi-agent regimen for older adults with ALL. Methods: Patients aged 51 to 75 years of age with newly diagnosed B-ALL and T-ALL were screened for eligibility. Patients with mature ALL (including Burkitt's) were excluded. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL (BCR-ABL1+) were eligible, and dasatinib was added to the chemotherapy on Day 10 for these patients. The chemotherapy treatment schedule from induction through maintenance is outlined in Table 1. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib during induction for these patients, the primary objective of the trial. After consolidation I, patients in complete remission (CR) with a suitable donor were offered a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as per institutional guidelines. Those not going to HSCT continued therapy as noted in the table. Results: There were 19 patients with B-ALL enrolled, none with T-ALL. Among these patients, 7 harbored BCR-ABL1 rearrangements. The median age was 65 years, 74% were male, and 90% had a performance status 0 or 1. The MTD was 2.3 mg of ixazomib, as 2 patients at 3.0 mg developed DLT's: a grade 3 peripheral neuropathy and a grade 5 acute kidney injury (Table 2). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities encountered at any time consisted mainly of grade 4 neutropenia in 13 patients and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 12 patients. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and 5 patients experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Two patients with grade 2 neuropathy did not meet the definition of DLT. Among the 19 patients, 15 (79%, [95% confidence interval (CI), 54-94%]) achieved CR (14) or CRi (1), and 5 patients went on to HSCT. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range, 1-5) for 8 patients remaining alive. The 1-year overall survival estimate was 53% [95% CI, 29-72%], while the 2-year overall survival estimate was 47% [95% CI, 24-67%]. Conclusions: A dose of 2.3 mg of ixazomib in combination with induction chemotherapy among older patients with ALL was well-tolerated and associated with a promising rate of complete remission. Disclosures Amrein: Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Brunner:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fathi:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Blueprint: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: MLN 9708, ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. In this trial it is used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Early Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Use of Asparaginase during Induction Chemotherapy Appear to Improve Otherwise Poor Outcomes in Adult T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma (T-ALL/T-LBL) Patients: A Multi-Institutional Review

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4869-4869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uma Borate ◽  
Amanda Redden Hathaway ◽  
Deniz Peker ◽  
Bradford E Jackson ◽  
Vamsi K Kota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Regimen ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Institutional Review

Abstract Background: AdultT-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/T-LBL) is a rare, aggressive bone marrow malignancy with a historically poor prognosis despite use of various chemotherapies. Methods: After institutional review board approval, we compiled a database of all adult T-ALL/T-LBL cases at three large cancer centers between the years 2005-2015, treated at the physician's discretion. Data collected included patient demographics, tumor characteristics (white cell count at diagnosis, blast phenotype, FISH, cytogenetics, bone marrow involvement), treatment regimens and patient outcomes. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined looking at medians and interquartile ranges of times to events. Kaplan Meier curves provided a graphical representation of the survival probability. Moreover, we provided estimates of the 50th percentile along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also used Univariate and Multivariable Cox Regression to estimate unadjusted and adjusted Hazard Ratios (HRs) and their 95% CIs. Stratified analysis was also performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test to compare median survival times, and the Log-rank to compare survival curses for RFS and OS. Results: The final analysis included 95 adult patients. Median age at diagnosis was 32 (range 17-75). 71.6% of patients were male. 49.5% of patients were white, 14.7% were black, 6.3% were Hispanic, 7.4% were Asian and in 22.1% of patients the race was unknown. Multiple frontline treatment regimens were used with 60% of patients treated with Hyper-CVAD, an additional 5.3% of patients received Hyper-CVAD with asparaginase, 24.2% of patients were treated on a pediatric-based protocol, 4.2% on a clinical trial, and 6.3% received other regimens. In total, 40 patients (42.1%) received asparaginase at some point during treatment regimen with 27 patients (28.4%) receiving it in the initial treatment regimen. After induction therapy, 65 patients (68.4%) achieved remission. Twenty-eight patients (29.5%) underwent transplant (8 matched-related donors, 10 matched unrelated donors, 5 mismatched unrelated donor, 2 cord transplants, 2 autologous, and 1 haplo-identical transplant). Ten patients (10.5%) underwent transplant in first complete remission (CR1) while two patients (2.1%) proceeded to transplant with minimal residual disease following induction. Despite therapy, 59 patients (62.1%) had known disease relapse or progressive disease. 16 patients (16.8%) underwent transplant after disease relapse. At time of analysis, 57 patients (60.6%) died. In the entire cohort, median RFS was 12.9 months and median OS was 19 months. In patients with a very high white count (>100 x 103/cmm at presentation) there was a trend toward earlier relapse when compared to patients presenting with white counts in the normal range (HR 2.27, p-value 0.085). Patients who received asparaginase in their initial treatment regimen have statistically improved RFS (HR 2.65, p-value = 0.014) and OS (HR 2.3, p-value=0.017). When adjusting for the presence of the covariates of age, sex, and WBC, patients who received initial asparaginase still had significant improvement in RFS (HR 3.18, p-value 0.033). In overall survival, significant benefit was seen in the addition of asparaginase in patients under 40 (HR 3.4, CI 1.22-9.5), however in patients greater than 40, asparaginase use seemed to decrease survival (HR 0.24, CI 0.03-1), although this did not reach statistical significance. All patients who underwent transplant had an improvement in OS, with median survival in the transplant group of 27 months compared to 18.2 months in the non-transplanted patients (log-rank test p-value = 0.048). Patients who received a transplant in CR1 had a trend towards improvement in RFS of 6.3 months (17.8 months versus 11.5 months in non-transplanted patients; log-rank test p-value = 0.03). Conclusion: Overall, adult T-ALL/T-LBL has a poor prognosis. Our multi-institutional retrospective review showed that OS and RFS may be improved by incorporating asparaginase use in front line therapy and by transplanting patients in first CR. Our data is limited in that actual dosing of asparaginase was not examined and that relatively few patients > 40 yrs old received asparaginase (4 pts) or SCT (5 pts). More prospective studies are needed in older adult T-ALL/LBL patients using these approaches to possibly improve their outcomes. Disclosures Borate: Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Genoptix: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Hathaway:OnQ Health: Research Funding. Kota:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding. Shah:DeBartolo Institute for Personlaized Medicine: Research Funding; Rosetta Genomics: Research Funding; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, INC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Plexus Communications: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Spectrum: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; SWOG: Consultancy; NCCN: Consultancy. Jillella:Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding. Heffner:Amgen: Consultancy. Erba:Novartis; Incyte; Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; GlycoMimetics; Janssen: Other: Data Safety & Monitoring Committees; Seattle Genetics; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda; Celator; Astellas: Research Funding; Sunesis;Pfizer; Daiichi Sankyo; Ariad: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Outcomes By Best Response with Hypomethylating Agent Plus Venetoclax in Adults with Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2292-2292
Author(s):  
Virginia Olivia Volpe ◽  
Akriti G Jain ◽  
Onyee Chan ◽  
Eric Padron ◽  
David A. Sallman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Free State ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (HMA) (HMA+VEN) is a standard of care treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy. In the phase 3 VIALE-A trial, azacididine (aza)+VEN compared to aza alone demonstrated an improved overall survival of 14.7 months versus 9.6 months, respectively. A common toxicity with HMA+VEN is myelosuppression. The prognostic implications of incomplete count recovery despite leukemia free state after HMA+VEN treatment in AML is unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes of those who achieved complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) in AML patients treated frontline with HMA+VEN. Methods: Patients seen at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2019 and 2021 diagnosed with AML and treated with frontline HMA+VEN were retrospectively evaluated and included for analysis. Patients were stratified by best response; either CR, CRi, or MLFS. Baseline characteristics were compared by chi square (categorical variables) and t- test (continuous variables). Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from date of diagnosis and groups were compared using log-rank test. Results: Of the 102 patients treated with HMA+VEN in the frontline setting, 48% (n=49) had blast clearance with a best response of CR in 27/102 (26.4%), CRi in 16/102 (15.7%), or MLFS in 6/102 (5.9%). The remainder had residual disease. Baseline characteristics were similar among the three response groups (Table 1) as was mutational distribution (Table 2). There was no difference between AML WHO classification subtype (p= .148). Decitabine or aza was used at the discretion of the treating physician did not significantly impact responses (p= .225). In those who achieved CR, 14% had prior therapy related AML compared to 37.5% in CRi and 33.3% in MLFS (p= .314). Antecedent MDS or MPN with transformation to AML was seen in 22.2%, 18.8%, and 66.7% of CR, CRi, and MLFS respectively (p= .029). Of those, 3.7% in CR group had HMA use for prior MDS/MPN compared to 0% in CRi and 50% in MLFS (p= .000). The median relapse free survival was not reached for CR, CRi, and MLFS (Figure 1), it is important to note that 3 of the 6 MLFS patients died without relapse . At median follow up of 23 months, median overall survival (OS) in the CR group was significantly longer, 31 months, compared to 18 months in the CRi group and 8.5 months in the MLFS group (p=0.0415) (Figure 2). Transplant was achieved in 26% of CR and 6.3% of CRi and 0% of MLFS and was not significant among the groups (p = .124). Conclusion: Patients who received frontline HMA+VEN for AML directed therapy and achieved CR/CRi had better survival compared to those who achieved MLFS. Our data suggest that incomplete recovery of blood counts plays a significant role in overall survival regardless of leukemia free state. Further, the data demonstrate significantly higher secondary AML with antecedent MDS or MPN in the MLFS group compared to CR and CRi groups. Of those, prior HMA therapy was also identified as significantly higher in the MLFS group compared to CR and CRi groups which may contribute to the prolonged cytopenias and worse OS. While the limitation to this study is overall small number of patients, it suggests that a goal of CR over CRi or MLFS is desirable for superior OS. In the future, it would be of interest to incorporate the rates of responses and variables that may have an impact such as therapy dose adjustment, time to response, and delays in therapy due to cytopenia. Additional studies identifying dose adjustments or other ways to improve hematologic recovery would be valuable to potentially improve outcomes in this difficult to treat population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Padron: Stemline: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Blueprint: Honoraria; Kura: Research Funding. Sallman: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Consultancy; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Consultancy; BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet: AbbVie: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Millenium Pharma/Takeda: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; BerGenBio: Consultancy. Sweet: AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Poor Outcomes with Hyper CVAD Induction for T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3762-3762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vamsi K Kota ◽  
Amanda Redden Hathaway ◽  
Bijal D. Shah ◽  
Deniz Peker ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Genetics Research

Abstract Background: T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) in adults is an aggressive bone marrow malignancy that historically has a poor prognosis. Hyper-CVAD/methotrexate-cytarabine (hyper CVAD) regimen is a commonly used induction regimen following the protocol developed at MD Anderson Cancer center. Recent reports from Swedish Cancer Registry showed that relapse rates were much higher than expected with this regimen. We report our retrospective experiences across three different centers, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University (Atlanta), University of Alabama Cancer Center (Birmingham) and Moffitt Cancer Center, (Tampa), with the use of this regimen for management of T-ALL/LBL. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all adult T-ALL/T-LBL cases at three large cancer centers between the years 2005-2015, treated at the physician's discretion. Data collected included patient demographics, tumor characteristics (white count at diagnosis, flow cytometry, FISH, cytogenetics, bone marrow involvement), treatment regimens and patient outcomes. Since hyper CVAD is a commonly used regimen outside of clinical trials, we focused our analysis on outcomes with this regimen. This regimen consisted of 4 courses of hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine [VCR], doxorubicin, dexamethasone; the odd courses 1, 3, 5, 7); and 4 courses of MTX-Ara-C (methotrexate-cytarabine; the even courses 2, 4, 6, 8). CNS prophylaxis was given to all patients as per standard of care recommendations. All patients eligible for maintenance received 2 years of POMP (6 mercaptopurine, methotrexate, vincristine and prednisone) maintenance. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined looking at medians and interquartile ranges of times to events. Kaplan Meier curves provided a graphical representation of the survival probability. Results: The final analysis included 95 adult patients with 64/95 (67%) patients receiving hyper-CVAD induction. Among the hyper-CVAD patients the median age at diagnosis was 30 (range 17-74). 71% of patients were male. Median white cell count (WBC) was 13.6/mm3 (1.7-500). Cytogenetic analysis revealed diploid in 36, complex (1 or more abnormalities in 16) and was not available in 12. WBC count was > 100,000/mm3 in 9 patients. 14 patients had mediastinal disease while 7 had CNS disease at diagnosis. Hyper-CVAD was the primary induction regimen in 56/64. Other patients either started on non-hyper CVAD induction prior to switching (n=3) or had asparaginase added to induction (n=5). The median number of cycles given as 7 (range 2-10) with 27(45%) patients receiving the planned 8 cycles. 37 patients did not complete 8 cycles due to stem cell transplant in remission (n=12), progressive disease (n=10) and unclear reasons (n=15). After induction therapy, remission status was unknown in 3 patients while 43/61 patients (70%) achieved remission. Maintenance with POMP was started in 21 patients that were in remission while 12 patients were taken to transplant without starting on maintenance. At the time of analysis, 23/64 (35%) patients are alive. The median relapse free survival was 387 days (12.9 months) and the median overall survival was 536 days (17.6 months). Excluding one patient lost to follow up, 44/63 (69.8%) relapsed. There was no difference in relapse versus non relapse patients in terms of median age (30 vs 33 years), median WBC at diagnosis (13.2 vs 13.6 mm3). Relapse rate was lower in patients with diploid karyotype (22/36, 61%) as compared to those with complex karyotype (14/16). Median survival in patients post relapse was 150 days. Only 9 patients were able to go for transplant after relapse with post transplant survival also being low (6 deaths). For the entire group, the two year survival was 35%. Conclusion: Our multi-institutional retrospective review shows that outcomes are poor across various centers in patients outside of clinical trials. This is the largest reported series of patients with adult T-ALL/T-LBL treated with hyper-CVAD outside of clinical trials. This data warrants investigation with newer agents to improve outcomes in this disease. Figure 1. Relapse free survival and overall survival in patients treated with hyper-CVAD (n=64) Figure 1. Relapse free survival and overall survival in patients treated with hyper-CVAD (n=64) Disclosures Kota: Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hathaway:OnQ Health: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PLexus Communications: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; Rosetta Genomics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Jillella:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Borate:Genoptix: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (Ino) May Overcome the Impact of Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph)-like Phenotype in Adult Patients (pts) with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1641-1641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Kathryn G. Roberts ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Yaqi Zhao ◽  
Chunxu Qu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Impact

Background: Ino showed significant activity in phase II trials in pts with R/R ALL, that was subsequently confirmed in Phase III trial where Ino demonstrated higher response rates and superior overall survival vs standard of care chemotherapy (SOC) in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL).Ph-like or BCR-ABL1-like ALL possesses a gene expression profile similar to that of BCR-ABL1 ALL but lacks the BCR-ABL1 fusion protein. It is characterized by increased expression of hematopoietic stem-cell genes, deletion of B-cell lineage genes and kinase-activating alterations. Ph-like ALL is associated with refractoriness to standard induction/consolidation chemotherapy and poor prognosis. Aim: To evaluate the outcomes of pts with R/R Ph-like ALL treated in phase II trial with Ino monotherapy. Methods: We performed an integrated analysis of whole genome sequencing (to identify sequence mutations, structural variations and DNA copy number alterations), and transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq; to quantify gene expression, determine Ph-like gene expression profile and identify fusions) on 53 patients' samples treated with Ino between June 2010 and September 2012. Results: Fifty-three evaluable pts with R/R ALL with stored baseline samples were analyzed. Pts characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Median age was 50 years. Ino was given as Salvage 1, Salvage 2, and Salvage 3 and beyond in 20 (38%), 18 (34%), and 15 (28%) pts, respectively. Figure 1 reflects the different genomic subgroups identified among 53 evaluable pts. Ph-like gene signature was found in 12 pts (22.6%). Among these 12 pts, 6 had IGH-CRLF2, 2 IGH-EPOR, 1 SNX2-ABL1, and 3 had no fusions identified. The overall response rates (ORR) were 54% [complete remission (CR) 20%, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) 32%, and marrow CR (CRi) 2%]. Among pts with morphologic remission, 46% and 82% achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at CR and at any time, respectively. The ORR for pts with Ph-like ALL, Ph-positive ALL, ALL with KMT2A, and others were 58% (CR=25%; CRh=33%), 42% (CR=8%; CRh=33%), 57% (CR=14%; CRh=29%; CRi=14%), and 56% (CR=26%; CRh=30%), respectively. The respective overall MRD negativity rates were 71%, 100%, 75%, and 83% (Table 1). The median follow-up was 60 months. The median event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.3 and 5.4 months, respectively. There was no difference in EFS and OS between the subgroups analyzed (P=0.464; P=0.824). The median EFS and OS were 4.5 and 4.5 months for pts with Ph-like, 3.1 and 7.2 months for those with Ph-positive ALL, 2.8 and 4.4 months for those with KMT2A, and 2.2 and 4.6 months for others (Table 1). 21 (40%) pts had subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant; 6 (50%), 3 (25%), 4 (57%), and 8 (36%) in each subgroup, respectively. The rate of VOD was 3 (6%) with no difference among different subgroups. Conclusion: The current analysis suggest that Ino therapy may overcome the impact of Ph-like phenotype in pts with ALL. Confirmation of these findings in a larger cohort and in frontline ALL patients is needed. Disclosures Jabbour: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding. Sasaki:Pfizer: Consultancy; Otsuka: Honoraria. Jain:Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ravandi:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Research Funding; Macrogenix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Menarini Ricerche: Research Funding; Selvita: Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding. Short:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Garcia-Manero:Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Konopleva:Cellectis: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Honoraria; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Kisoji: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ablynx: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffman La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding. Mullighan:Illumina: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored travel; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: speaker, sponsored travel, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: speaker, sponsored travel. Kantarjian:Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Amino Acid Stress Response Genes Promote L-Asparaginase Resistance in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3304-3304
Author(s):  
Daniel Ferguson ◽  
J. Robert McCorkle ◽  
Qian Dong ◽  
Erik Bonten ◽  
Wenjian Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Acid Stress ◽  
Leukemia Cells ◽  
P Value ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Primary Leukemia

Abstract Understanding the genomic and epigenetic mechanisms of drug resistance in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is critical for further improvements in treatment outcome. The role of transcriptomic response in conferring resistance to l-asparaginase (LASP) is poorly understood, beyond asparagine synthetase (ASNS). We defined reproducible LASP response genes in LASP resistant and sensitive ALL cell lines (n = 7) as well as primary leukemia samples from newly diagnosed patients. We identified 2219 response genes (absolute log 2FC &gt; 1.5, FDR p-value &lt;0.05) with ~16.5% being reproduced in more than one cell line. Defining target genes of the amino acid stress response related transcription factor ATF4 in ALL cell lines using ChIP-seq revealed 25% of genes that changed expression after LASP treatment were direct targets of the ATF4 transcription factor. A total of 17,117 significantly differentially bound ATF4 sites were identified (FDR p-value &lt;0.01) and 97.8% of these sites displayed an increase in ATF4 binding following LASP treatment. SLC7A11 was found to be a response gene in cell lines and patient samples as well as a direct target of ATF4. SLC7A11 was also one of only 2.4% of response genes with basal level gene expression that also correlated with LASP ex vivo resistance in primary leukemia cells from 212 newly diagnosed children enrolled on St. Jude Total Therapy 16. Experiments using chemical inhibition of SLC7A11 with sulfasalazine, gene overexpression, and partial gene knockout recapitulated LASP resistance or sensitivity in ALL cell lines. These findings show the importance of assessing changes in gene expression following treatment with an antileukemic agent for its association with drug resistance and highlights that many response genes may not differ in their basal expression in drug resistant leukemia cells. Disclosures Stock: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; amgen: Honoraria; agios: Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; kura: Honoraria; kite: Honoraria; morphosys: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pluristeem: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mullighan: Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Illumina: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Pui: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Data Monitoring Committee. Evans: Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Scientific Advisory Board, Chair: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioSkryb, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Emeritus Member (began Jan 2021): Ended employment in the past 24 months.

Addition of Rituximab Improves Outcome of HIV Negative Patients with Burkitt Lymphoma Treated with the Lmba Protocol: Results of the Randomized Intergroup (GRAALL-Lysa) LMBA02 Protocol. (IGR sponsored LMBA02, NCT00180882)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 685-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
Serge Koscielny ◽  
Krimo Bouabdallah ◽  
Gilles Salles ◽  
Olivier Casasnovas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
P Value ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Extension Group ◽  
Disease Extension ◽  
Group B ◽  
Hiv Negative

Abstract Abstract 685 Background: Intensive chemotherapy is now considered as a standard of care in adult patients with Burkitt Lymphoma (BL). Although some single arm studies suggested that adding rituximab to these intensive short-course regimen could improve patientÕs outcome, no randomized study have been reported so far. Methods: To evaluate the potential benefit of adding rituximab to intensive chemotherapy, we conducted a phase III trial comparing the standard LMBA protocol (Divine et al, Ann Oncol 1995) to the same regimen plus rituximab. Rituximab (375 mg/m2) was given on day 1 and 6 during the first 2 courses of COPADM. Patient eligibility criteria included age >18 years, HIV negativity and previously untreated BL. The primary study objective was event-free survival (EFS). A study sample size of 250 pts was estimated in order to detect a 15% gain in EFS (two-side test, power 90%, type 1 error 5%). Secondary objectives were safety and overall survival. Treatment was adapted on disease extension (group B vs C) and age for patients from the C group (age <40; 40–59 and >59). Group C included patients with bone marrow and/or CNS involvement, and group B all the other patients. Methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine doses were adapted to age in the group C. Lenograstim was given prophylactically to the pts. The randomization was stratified on disease extension (group B vs C) and age. Results: From October 2004 to September 2010, 257 patients from 45 centers were included; 128 in the Rituximab arm and 129 in the standard arm. Median age was 47 (26% were > 60), M/F ratio was 2.5, serum LDH level was > normal in 75% of the patients, and 11% had a performance status (PS)>2. The two treatment arms were well balanced for pretreatment characteristics, except for age and PS. Patients were older in the Rituximab arm (30%>60 years old vs 17% in the standard arm) or had a higher PS>2 (17% with PS>2 vs 7%). With a median follow-up of 38 months (range 0.3 to 79), patients treated in the rituximab arm had a better EFS (3 year EFS 76%; 95% CI: 69–84 vs 64% in standard arm; 95%CI: 55–72; Logrank P value stratified on treatment group=0.046), and Overall Survival (3 year OS 82%; 95% CI: 77–90 vs 71% in standard arm; 95%CI: 63–79; Logrank P value, stratified on treatment group=0.016) (Figure). Fifty-eight patients died. Causes of death were lymphoma (9 in the rituximab arm and 22 in the standard arm), toxicity (9 in the rituximab arm and 7 in the standard arm), and other causes (4 in the rituximab arm and 7 in the standard arm). Safety was similar in both arms for duration of grade 4 neutropenia, number of platelet or red cell transfusions, minor or major infection. Conclusions: The addition of rituximab to LMBA protocol improves EFS and OS in adult BL HIV negative. No adverse and/or increased toxicity was observed when rituximab was added to this intensive chemotherapy regimen. Toxic death rate was similar to our previous phase II experience despite a higher median age in this randomized multicenter trial. Disclosures: Ribrag: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Ruxolitinib is approved in the United States and Canada for the treatment of myelofibrosis and is being investigated in combination with panobinostat, an investigational product, in this indication. This abstract reports on a clinical trial conducted outside the US. All patients have provided written informed consent. Salles:roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Herbrecht:Pfizer: Advisory board member Other. Coiffier:roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Characteristics and Outcomes Of Patients (pts) With Multiple Myeloma (MM) Who Develop Therapy (t)-Related Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), t-Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), Or t-Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1424-1424
Author(s):  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
Dhaval Shah ◽  
Hagop M Kantarjian ◽  
Verena Wagner ◽  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background There has been a significant improvement in the outcome for patients (pts) with MM over the last decade, mainly due to the availability of immunomodulatory (IMiD) drugs and proteasome inhibitors (PI). The improvement in survival has also increased the risk of second primary malignancies (SPM), such as therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS), therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (t-CMML) or therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML). However, little is known about the characteristics and outcomes of pts with t-MDS, t-CMML or t-AML. Methods We aimed to study the characteristics and outcome of pts who developed t-MDS, t-AML and t-CMML as SPM after the treatment of MM. We reviewed our database of pts with MM who were treated at our institution between 1993 and 2011. We identified 49 pts who were diagnosed to have t-MDS, t-CMML, or t-AML. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the time to develop t-MDS, t-AML and t-CMML, their response to treatment and overall survival. Results Median age of pts at diagnosis of MM was 61 years. Forty-seven (96%) pts had symptomatic MM, while 2 (4%) had asymptomatic myeloma. Forty-seven (95%) pts with symptomatic myeloma received systemic therapy. Eleven (22%) pts were treated with IMiD or PI: lenalidomide 3, thalidomide 6 and bortezomib 2. Thirty-eight (78%) pts were treated with various conventional chemotherapeutic agents including melphalan, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, cisplatin, idarubicin, thiotepa, busulfan, carmustine and cytarabine. Fourteen (28%) pts also received radiation therapy to the affected areas. Twenty (41%) pts underwent high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Fourteen pts received maintenance therapy after auto-HCT with either thalidomide, lenalidomide, dexamethasone or bortezomib. Median time from the diagnosis of MM to t-MDS, t-CMML or t-AML was 6 years [0 – 24]. Thirty-four (69 %) pts developed t-MDS, 12 (24%) t-AML, and 3 (6%) t-CMML. Median age at diagnosis of t-MDS, t- CMML, or t-AML was 65 years. Twenty-seven (79%) pts with t-MDS and all 12 pts with t-AML had complex/high risk cytogenetics. Most common cytogenetic abnormalities involved chromosome 5 and 7. Thirty four (69%) pts received at least 1 cycle of induction chemotherapy either with conventional chemotherapeutic agents or investigational drugs. Only 9 pts (26%) achieved complete remission (CR). Median duration of CR in these pts was 4 months [1 – 62]. Median overall survival (OS) of pts who received induction therapy was 6.0 months [0-30]. Five (11%) pts received an allogeneic stem cell transplant with three achieving CR. Median OS in this subgroup of pts was 18 months [9 – 23]. Median OS for all 49 pts after diagnosis of t-MDS, t-CMML or t-AML was 6.0 months [0 – 30] Conclusion Development of t-MDS, t-CMML, or t-AML in pts with MM is associated with a poor outcome. These pts in general have complex cytogenetic abnormalities, chemo-resistant disease, a short CR and OS. A better understanding of disease biology and novel therapeutic approaches are warranted. Disclosures: Orlowski: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Resverlogix: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qazilbash:Otsuka: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Risk Factors Affecting Outcome of Transplantation in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of the International BFM ALL SCT Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2015-2015
Author(s):  
Adriana Balduzzi ◽  
Jean-Hugues Dalle ◽  
Arjan C Lankester ◽  
Isaac Yaniv ◽  
Akif Yesilipek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Donor Type

Abstract BACKGROUND. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is of benefit in pediatric patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first or further remission. Whether transplantation from unrelated donors could yield similar results to transplantation from HLA identical siblings is still to be assessed within countries running different frontline and relapse protocols. AIM OF THE STUDY. A prospective study was initiated within the International BFM Study Group, in order to assess whether the outcome of HSCT from a 9 or 10 out of 10 HLA allelic matched compatible donor (MD) was inferior to the outcome of HSCT from a matched sibling donor (MSD) in children or young adults with ALL carrying very high risk eligibility criteria for transplantation. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) and secondary endpoints were non-relapse mortality (NRM) and incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD, cGVHD). PATIENTS AND METHODS. Between 2007 and 2013, 10 countries (Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Israel, Italy, The Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, Slovakia, Turkey) participated into the ALL SCT I-BFM Study, coordinated by Peters in Vienna. 298 consecutive patients, 18 years old or younger (70% male, median age 9 years), affected with VHR ALL in complete remission (CR), were enrolled in the core arm of the Study (MD vs MSD). Of 298, 107 patients were transplanted from a MSD (50% in CR1, 47% in CR2, 4% >CR2) and 191 from a MD (44% in CR1, 48% CR2, 9% >CR2), either related (5%) or unrelated (95%), at a median of 189 and 197 days, respectively, after diagnosis/relapse. As per protocol, conditioning regimen consisted of TBI-etoposide, in patients older than 2 years, or busulfan-cyclophosphamide-melphalan, in patients 2 years or younger, and GVHD-prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine (CSA) only for MSD and CSA/methotrexate/ATG for MD recipients. Median follow-up for alive patients was 3.1 years. RESULTS. Three-year EFS was 67% (SE 5%) for MSD vs 61% (SE 4%) for MD recipients (p-value 0.254), overall survival (OS) 76% (SE 4%) vs 69% (SE 4%) (p-value 0.207), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) 24% (SE 4%) vs 22% (SE 3%) (p-value 0.935) and NRM 8% (SE 3%) vs 16% (SE 3%) (p-value 0.094), respectively. There was a trend for a higher risk NRM for MD patients, although no statistical significance was reached (HR 1.94, CI 0.85-4.41; p=0.114), after adjusting for risk profile and donor type. Being transplanted in CR2 was associated with lower EFS and higher NRM (p=0.001). Grade II-IV acute GVHD occurred in 37% and grade III-IV in 16% of MSD vs 42% and 15% of MD recipients; 39% of the evaluable MSD and 19% of the MD recipients experienced chronic GVHD, which was severe in 24% and 10%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of developing chronic GVHD was 39% (SE 5%) and 17% (SE 3%), for patients grafted from MSD and MD, respectively (p=0.001). Being transplanted from a MD, compared with a MSD, was significantly associated with a reduced risk of developing chronic GVHD (HR 0.31, CI 0.18-0.54, p <0.001), despite a similar risk of relapse (HR 0.81, CI 0.47-1.39; p=0.440). Acute GVHD grade 3 or 4 had statistically significant impact on NRM (HR 4.76, CI 2.33-9.74; <0.001) and OS (HR 1.97, CI 1.14-3.42; p=0.016), after adjusting for risk profile and donor type. CONCLUSIONS. Outcome of transplantation of MD pediatric recipients with VHR ALL in CR was not inferior to the outcome of MSD recipients in terms of EFS, OS, and CIR, with probability of chronic GVHD being lower for MD versus MSD recipients, which suggests the crucial role of serotherapy, and severe acute GVHD being associated with increased NRM and lower OS but similar CIR. Disclosures Dalle: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Macopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peters:Medac: Research Funding; Fresenius: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sanovi: Research Funding; Pierre-Fabre: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document