Expanded Access Program of Graspa for Treatment of Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Unable to Receive Other Form of L-Asparaginase - a Status Update (NCT02197650)

Abstract Background L-asparaginase (L-ASP) is a key drug in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However the toxicity profile, especially hypersensitivities up to acute allergic reactions is a major drawback. GRASPA (eryaspase (proposed INN) or E-Coli L-Asparaginase encapsulated into red blood cells) is a new product under development with the aim of improving the tolerance of this enzyme. Asparagine is actively transported through the membrane of red blood cells (RBC) where it is hydrolyzed by the encapsulated L-ASP, the erythrocytes acting as "bioreactors". The RBC membrane shields against the anti-L-ASP antibody then avoiding binding to encapsulated L-ASP. Recently, a Phase III pivotal study of GRASPA in combination with COOPRALL chemotherapy protocols in patients with relapsed ALL demonstrated highly significant safety profile and clinical activity compared to control. However, there is an unmet medical need for patients who cannot receive current formulations of L-ASP. An expanded access program has recently been initiated in France to provide access for treatment with GRASPA in patients who are unable to receive other forms of L-ASP. Methods: This is a non randomized multicenter open label study, currently initiated in France. The primary objective of the EAP is to evaluate the tolerability of GRASPA. Patients under 55y of age presenting with de novo, relapsed or refractory ALL who are at risk to receive any other available L-ASP formulation are enrolled into this program. Patients with known allergic reactions to E.Coli L-ASP are also eligible. GRASPA is administrated every 2 to 3 weeks at a dose equivalent to 150 IU/kg of L-ASP during all chemotherapy courses intended to contain an asparaginase. Chemotherapy protocols are given according to the Investigator's choice. Patients are assessed regularly for safety and tolerability. The primary endpoint is tolerability; Key secondary endpoints include asparaginase activity, asparagine depletion, and clinical remission rates. An independent Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) is set up, which will assess toxicities on yearly basis. Results As of time of June 2015, 13 patients were enrolled into the program. The first DSMB meeting reviewed the outcome of the first 7 patients enrolled into the program. Of the 7 pts (range 3 - 49 years), 5 males and 2 females were enrolled. Four pts presented with refractory disease and 3 with relapse, with all patients had evidence of allergies to 2 prior asparaginases (double allergies). There were 2 pts presenting with limiting toxicities, in the form of myelosupression, and streptococcal infection. There was no modification to the protocol recommended by the first DSMB An updated safety and clinical activity information on all patients will be provided. Conclusion: The EAP provides a potential treatment alternative for ALL patients, who are unable, or at risk of developing hypersensitivity reactions to prior asparaginases. The initial results from this program suggests that GRASPA is well tolerated, and may have a potential benefit in patients with double allergies. The program will be expanded to other European countries Disclosures Bertrand: ERYTECH Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dombret:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Recher:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Salako:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment. Godfrin:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment. El Hariry:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment.

Download Full-text

Expanded Access Program: Evaluating Safety of Erythrocytes Encapsulating L-Asparaginase in Combination with Polychemotherapy in Patients Under 55 Years Old with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) at Risk to Receive Other Formulations of Asparaginase

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147834 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1214-1214

Author(s):

Yves Bertrand ◽

Nicolas Boissel ◽

Claudine Schmitt ◽

Alban Villate ◽

Emmanuel Gyan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

At Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Whole Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

E Coli ◽

Expanded Access ◽

Expanded Access Program ◽

To Receive ◽

Access Program

Abstract Introduction Asparaginase is an important part of the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Hypersensitivity is found in 16.8% of patients treated with pegylated asparaginase (PEG-asp). Hypersensitivity is the most common cause of truncated asparaginase therapy which has been associated with decreased event free survival. Asparaginase (ASNase) encapsulated in erythrocytes (eryaspase) is an alternative formulation of ASNase aiming to prolong the half-life of ASNase and to reduce toxicity e.g. hypersensitivity, since the erythrocyte membrane protects asparaginase against elimination and prevents activation of the immune system. In the NOR-GRASPALL 2016 trial eryaspase consistently demonstrated prolonged ASNase activity in patients who developed hypersensitivity reactions to PEG-asp. Treatment with eryaspase was well tolerated when combined with multiagent chemotherapy. The objective of this expanded access program was to explore the tolerability of eryaspase (150 U/Kg) combined with polychemotherapy in patients under 55 years of age with ALL, unable or at risk to receive any other available ASNase formulation. Patients in this study had developed hypersensitivities to prior E-Coli- and Erwinia-derived asparaginase therapies. Methods This was a non-randomized, multicentre, open label, Phase 1 study to assess the limiting toxicities, global safety and biological efficacy of eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy regimens. Patients were under 55 years of age with ALL de novo or in relapse or refractory; eligible for a chemotherapy treatment including ASNase; known contraindication and/or at risk of toxicity from other ASNase formulations. Eryaspase (150 U/Kg) was given as a replacement therapy for the remaining intended courses of asparaginase therapy. The number of courses was not defined and depended on therapeutic treatment chosen by the Investigator and the patient's response and tolerance. The primary endpoint was the exploration of the toxicity of eryaspase defined as the number and percent of patients presenting at least one limiting toxicity (LT) of eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy. Major secondary endpoints included: adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and complete remission (CR) status at end of induction and survival status up to 12 months after inclusion. Results Eighteen patients enrolled of which seven (38.8%) patients experienced a total of 24 AE limiting toxicities, which were primarily bone marrow failure, and were indicative of the underlying ALL disease process and of the concomitant chemotherapy-related myelosuppression. All patients experienced at least one AE and Treatment Emergent (TEAE) and most (11 [61.1%] patients) experienced at least one SAE. A total of 17 (94.4%) patients experienced a TEAE of Grade 3 or above. No TEAEs led to withdrawal or dose reduction of eryaspase. Sparse whole blood ASNase concentrations following 150 U/Kg were within the range of concentrations expected for this dose level. At 14 days following the first infusion, the range of whole blood ASNase was 111 to 1160 U/Kg, which would be equivalent to the trough (nadir) for infusions every 2 weeks. Mean and median plasma asparagine (ASN) concentrations over time demonstrated a reduction by approximately 50% at 3 days post eryaspase infusion, followed by a slow return toward baseline before the next infusion of eryaspase. Seventeen (94.4%) patients achieved CR at least once overall. Fourteen (77.8%) patients were alive at the end of the study. Survival rate was 88.9% at 6 months and 77.8% at 12 and 18 months. Conclusion The AE profile of eryaspase was consistent with other studies and was as expected for this cohort of patients. Serious AEs were generally consistent with those that would be expected in this study population. A total of 17 patients in the study achieved a CR at least once overall and 14 were still alive at the end of the study. This study evaluated additional asparaginase therapy in double (and even triple) allergic patient population, who have received prior E-Coli- or Erwinia-derived asparaginase therapy. All patients achieved target asparaginase activity. Therefore, eryaspase provides an additional option for patients for whom further ASNase treatment is contraindicated due to toxicity and/or immunization. Disclosures Boissel: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; SANOFI: Honoraria; PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria; CELGENE: Honoraria. Recher: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MaatPharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. El-Hariry: Erytech: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company.

Download Full-text

Impact on Outcomes of Baseline Bilirubin in Patients with Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome Receiving Defibrotide Treatment: A Post-Hoc Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2213.2213 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2213-2213

Author(s):

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Angela R. Smith ◽

Brandon M. Triplett ◽

Nancy A. Kernan ◽

Stephan A. Grupp ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Weight Gain ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Bilirubin Level ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

The United States ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Expanded Access ◽

Expanded Access Program ◽

Access Program

Abstract Introduction Hepatic veno-occlusive disease, also called sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS), is a difficult to predict, and potentially life-threatening complication of conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). VOD/SOS develops via a pathophysiologic cascade, and VOD/SOS with multi-organ dysfunction (MOD)/multi-organ failure (MOF) may be associated with >80% mortality. Defibrotide was recently approved in the United States for treating hepatic VOD/SOS with renal or pulmonary dysfunction post-HSCT and is approved in the European Union to treat severe hepatic VOD/SOS post-HSCT. In the United States, defibrotide had been available through an expanded-access program. Methods Patients in the expanded-access program were diagnosed with VOD/SOS by investigators using Baltimore criteria (bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL and ≥2 of the following: hepatomegaly, ascites, ≥5% weight gain), modified Seattle criteria (≥2 of the following: total bilirubin >2 mg/dL, hepatomegaly, or ascites and/or ≥5% weight gain [in this study]), or biopsy; elevated bilirubin was not required for patients with biopsy or who met modified Seattle criteria by presence of hepatomegaly with ascites/weight gain. This program included patients with or without MOD/MOF (defined by renal and/or pulmonary dysfunction). Defibrotide 25 mg/kg/day was given in 4 divided doses for a recommended ≥21 days. Here, Day +100 survival post-HSCT is explored post hoc based on 4 bilirubin-level categories at time of study entry; together these categories have been defined as 1 of the criteria in the proposed VOD/SOS grading scale for adults from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT; ≥2 mg/dL to <3 mg/dL, ≥3 mg/dL to <5 mg/dL, ≥5 mg/dL to <8 mg/dL, and ≥8 mg/dL [Mohty M et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:906-912]). It is important to note that bilirubin <2 mg/dL is not part of the proposed EBMT criteria for VOD/SOS in adults. Results Among 756 post-HSCT patients enrolled through April 18, 2015, who received ≥1 dose of defibrotide, 427 also had MOD/MOF. Median age was lowest in patients with bilirubin <2 mg/dL (5 years). By comparison, median age in patients with bilirubin ≥2 to <3 mg/dL (56% of all patients) was 16 years; for bilirubin ≥3 to <5 mg/dL, median age was 13 years; and for the 2 small groups with bilirubin ≥5 to <8 or ≥8 mg/dL, median ages were 15 and 16.5 years, respectively. Day +100 survival in the overall HSCT population of the expanded-access program was 55.4% by Kaplan-Meier estimate. The survival rate was 81.4% in patients with bilirubin <2 mg/dL; for patients with bilirubin levels ≥2 mg/dL, who tended to be older, survival estimates decreased (Table). Day +100 survival patterns by bilirubin level were generally similar in the subgroups of patients with and without MOD/MOF (Table). Overall, 515 post-HSCT patients (67%) reported ≥1 adverse event (AE). Serious AEs were reported by 386 patients (50%), and AEs leading to death occurred in 250 patients (33%). Among all AEs, 158 patients (21%) had AEs that investigators assessed as related (possibly, probably, or definitely) to study medication. Conclusions Overall, higher bilirubin levels were associated with worse Day +100 outcomes (with the exception of the ≥5 to <8 mg/dL group, which represented only 5% of patients, and so has limited validity). However, interpretation of these results has to be treated with caution because only a single criterion from the EBMT guidelines was analyzed and because potentially confounding interactions (eg, age) were not assessed. Across all bilirubin-level categories, VOD/SOS with MOD/MOF was consistently associated with worse outcomes than VOD/SOS without MOD/MOF. These results further support the importance of identifying VOD/SOS earlier and suggest that diagnosis and treatment of VOD/SOS, before bilirubin becomes markedly elevated, may be associated with improved outcomes. Support: Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Disclosures Richardson: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kernan:Gentium: Research Funding; The National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health: Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Antin:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liang:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Other: stock options exercisable for, and other stock awards of, ordinary shares of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. Hume:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Other: stock options exercisable for, and other stock awards of, ordinary shares of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. Tappe:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Other: stock options exercisable for, and other stock awards of, ordinary shares of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. Soiffer:GentiumSpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Expanded Access Program Of Ponatinib (AP24534) For Patients (Pts) With Refractory Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Or Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4044.4044 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4044-4044

Author(s):

Ghayathri Jeyakumar ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Kendra L. Sweet ◽

Cecilia Y Arana Yi ◽

Nitin Jain ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Disease Stage ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Expanded Access ◽

Expanded Access Program ◽

T315i Mutation ◽

Access Program

Abstract Background Ponatinib is a pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor with activity against BCR-ABL, including the TKI resistant T315I and all other clinically relevant mutant. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg orally once daily) in pts with CML in chronic (CP-CML), accelerated (AP-CML), or blastic (BP-CML) phase, or Ph+ ALL were evaluated in an expanded access program. Methods 49 pts, including 24 CP-CML, 5 AP-CML, 8 BP-CML (100% Myeloid Blasts), and 12 Ph+ ALL were registered at 2 institutions. Pts were resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib, or had the T315I mutation at baseline. For this analysis, pts were grouped in cohorts according to the disease stage and presence or not of T315I. Results The median age for CP-CML, AP-CML, BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL pts was 44, 36, 56, and 57 yrs, respectively. Median yrs from diagnosis to start of ponatinib were 7, 1, 3 and 2, respectively. 94% had received imatinib, 80% dasatinib, 59% nilotinib, 2% bosutinib, and 24% had undergone prior SCT. Among 37 pts evaluable for response to prior dasatinib or nilotinib, 84% had history of resistance to these agents, 16% were intolerant. 92% pts had received at least 2 prior TKI, and 45% had received at least 3. Reported response rates with the most recent TKI were 63% (15/24) MCyR for CP-CML, and CHR 60% AP-CML, 0% BP-CML, 33% Ph+ ALL. After a follow-up of 9 months on therapy, 49% of CP-CML, 60% of AP-CML, 25% of BP-CML, and 9% of Ph+ ALL pts remain on study. The reasons for discontinuation were progressive disease (38%, 40%, 75%, and 83%, respectively) and adverse events (13%, 0%, 0% and 8%, respectively). Among the 49 pts, 58% (14/24) pts in CP-CML have achieved MCyR (46% CCyR). 60% (3/5) AP-CML achieved MCyR (2 of them CCyR), and 35% (7/20) BP/Ph+ALL achieved MCyR (5 of them CCyR). MMR is available by IS only for 40 pts and 26% achieved MMR, and at 9 mos. MMR was achieved by 21% CP, 0% in AP, 0% in BP-CML and 38% Ph+ ALL. The median PFS for all pts was 5.8 mos. Estimated PFS at 9 mos. was 50% overall, and 71% in CP, and 75% in AP, 25% in BP-CML and 17% in Ph+ ALL. In CP-CML, AP- CML, BP-CML and Ph+ALL the median PFS was estimated as 12.5 mos., 13.3 mos., 3.5 mos. and 1.4 mos. respectively. Overall median OS was not reached. The probability of OS at 9 mos. for all pts was 80%.; in CP-CML it was 100%, in AP-CML was 75%, in BP-CML 58% and in Ph+ ALL was 53% at 9 mos. The most common AEs were thrombocytopenia (18%), G1-2 rash (14%), and neutropenia (12%) and the G3-4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (4%) and pancreatitis (6%) with G3-4 lipase elevation 8% and G3 amylase 8%. Conclusions Ponatinib has clinical activity in refractory CML and pretreated Ph+ leukemia patients who have limited treatment options. The results of this expanded access study match those of the pivotal PACE trial confirming the clinical benefit with ponatinib in this setting. Disclosures: Kantarjian: ARIAD: Research Funding. Jabbour:Ariad, BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer: Consultancy. O'Brien:ARIAD: Research Funding. Pinilla:Ariad: Advisory Board Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cortes:Ariad, Pfizer and Teva: Consultancy; Ariad, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Omission of High-Dose Cytarabine during Consolidation Therapy of Ph-Positive ALL Patients Treated with Nilotinib and Low-Intensity Chemotherapy Results in an Increased Risk of Relapses Despite Non-Inferior Levels of Late BCR-ABL1 MRD Response. First Results of the Randomized Graaph-2014 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148843 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 512-512

Author(s):

Philippe Rousselot ◽

Yves Chalandon ◽

Sylvie Chevret ◽

Jean-Michel Cayuela ◽

Francoise Huguet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

High Dose Cytarabine ◽

To Receive

Abstract On behalf of the GRAALL group. Introduction. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved the outcome of patients diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In a previous randomized trial (GRAAPH-2005; Chalandon Y., Blood 2015), our group demonstrated that anthracycline and cyclophosphamide could be safely omitted during the first Hyper-CVAD chemotherapy cycle when combined to imatinib. In the present GRAAPH-2014 trial, we investigated whether the use of nilotinib, a 2 nd generation TKI, would allow further decreasing chemotherapy intensity through the omission of high-dose cytarabine (HD-AraC) during consolidation cycles 2 and 4. Methods. From March 2016, patients aged 18-60 years old were randomized frontline to receive 4 cycles (1=3, 2=4) of chemotherapy combined with continuous nilotinib 400 mg bid. Cycle 1 and 3 were similar in both arms, identical to the less-intensive first cycle of the previous GRAAPH-2005 trial with weekly vincristine and dexamethasone and nilotinib instead of imatinib. Cycle 2 and 4 differed between control arm A (MTX 1 g/sqm over 24h, HD-AraC 3 g/sqm/12h for 2 days) and experimental arm B (MTX 1 g/sqm over 24h only). Marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by both BCR-ABL1 and IG-TCR qPCR after each cycle (MRD1-4). Patients in complete remission (CR) after cycle 4 were eligible to receive allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Non allografted patients had the option to receive autologous SCT (autoSCT) if a major molecular response (MMolR) (MRD4 BCR-ABL1 <0.1%) was achieved. AlloSCT and autoSCT were followed by a 2-year imatinib maintenance. The randomization was stratified on age (≤40y, >40y) and BCR-ABL1 breakpoint region (M/m-bcr). MMolR rate at MRD4 was the primary endpoint of this non-inferiority study, with a margin set at 0.15. In February 2019, the study DSMB decided to stop the randomizations after an unplanned analysis demonstrating a significant excess of relapse in arm B (without HD-AraC). An intention-to-treat analysis is provided. All patients gave informed consent. The study is registered at EudraCT under the number: 2014-002146-44. Results. A total of 156 patients were randomized (77 in arm A, and 79 in arm B). Median age was 47.1 years old (range 18.1-59.9). One-hundred and ten patients had the m-bcr (70.5%) and 46 (29.5%) the M-bcr. An IKZF1 intragenic deletion was found in 87/153 (56.9%). Median follow-up was 2.8 years (95%CI 2.6-3.1). All evaluable patients reached CR after a maximum of two cycles. Three patients died during cycle 1 (2 in arm A, 1 in arm B), and 2 during cycle 2 (1 per arm). Most patients received the 4 scheduled cycles (n=143, 91,7%). AlloSCT was performed in 91 patients (58.3%), whereas 41 patients received an autoSCT (26.3%) with no difference in allo/autoSCT rates between arms. A non-inferiority in late MRD response (MRD4) between the two arms was observed (primary endpoint). MMolR was reached in 55/75 (73.3%) and 61/78 (78.2%) of CR patients in arm A and B, respectively, with an estimated 95% CI of difference of -11% to +16% (-9.2% to +20.8% in the ITT analysis treating missing data as failures). At 3 years, overall survival (OS) was 86.0% in arm A versus 74.2% in arm B (p=.08, Figure A). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 79.6% in arm A versus 57.2% in arm B (p=.008, Figure B). Thirty-one patients experienced hematological relapse (8 in arm A and 23 in arm B). Twenty-height out of 31 relapsed patients were tested for the acquisition of BCR-ABL1 mutations, 20/28 (71%) had at least one mutation and 10/28 (36%) had a T315I mutation. At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 21.3%, significantly higher in arm B than in arm A (30.8% vs 10.6%, p=.007). When analyzing the CIR considering alloSCT as a competing event for relapse, a significant higher CIR was still observed in arm B as compared to arm A (Figure C). Conclusion. Four cycles of the combined administration of nilotinib and chemotherapy is very efficient for bridging younger adults with Ph-positive ALL to SCT. However, omitting HD-AraC is associated with a higher relapse incidence despite non-inferior levels of BCR-ABL1 MRD4. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chalandon: Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Amgen, Jazz, Astra Zenec: Other: Travel EXpenses, Accomodation; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen: Other: Advisory Board. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Celgene: Other: Advisor; BMS: Other: Advisor; Amgen: Other: Advisor; Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Vincent: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vey: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BIOKINESIS: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Raffoux: PFIZER: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy; ASTELLAS: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy. Boissel: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; SANOFI: Honoraria; PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria; JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Nilotinib as a therapy for PH-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Download Full-text

Treatment of Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD/SOS) Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in Patients with Acute Leukemias: A Subgroup Analysis from the Defibrotide Expanded-Access Program

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3412.3412 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3412-3412

Author(s):

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Angela R. Smith ◽

Brandon M. Triplett ◽

Nancy A. Kernan ◽

Stephan A. Grupp ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

The United States ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Expanded Access ◽

Expanded Access Program ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Access Program

Abstract Introduction Hepatic veno-occlusive disease, also called sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS), is an unpredictable, potentially life-threatening complication of conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Reported mean incidence of VOD/SOS following HSCT is an estimated 13.7% (range 0%-62.3%). VOD/SOS with multi-organ dysfunction (MOD) may be associated with >80% mortality. Endothelial cell (EC) damage, triggered by cytotoxic chemotherapeutic conditioning regimens and a prothrombotic-hypofibrinolytic state, is a critical factor in the pathophysiology of VOD/SOS. In the United States, defibrotide is approved for treating hepatic VOD/SOS with renal or pulmonary dysfunction post-HSCT, and in the European Union, defibrotide is approved to treat severe hepatic VOD/SOS post-HSCT. Prior to its approval, defibrotide had been available in the United States through an expanded-access program. Here, Day +100 post-HSCT survival and safety are analyzed for the 2 largest primary-disease subgroups in that study: acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Methods Patients in the expanded-access program had VOD/SOS diagnosed by Baltimore criteria (bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL and ≥2 of: hepatomegaly, ascites, ≥5% weight gain), modified Seattle criteria (≥2 of: total bilirubin >2 mg/dL, hepatomegaly, or ascites and/or ≥5% weight gain [in this study]), or biopsy, and this study included patients with or without MOD (defined by renal and/or pulmonary dysfunction). Defibrotide 25 mg/kg/day was given in 4 divided doses for a recommended ≥21 days. Results A total of 867 patients were enrolled in the safety population of the expanded-access program through April 18, 2015, including 476 patients with MOD. The primary diseases affecting 5% or more of the safety population at baseline were AML, 25.7% (222/867); ALL, 23.4% (202/867); neuroblastoma, 8.5% (73/867); and myelodysplastic syndrome, 5.7% (27/867). Data were available for 756 post-HSCT patients who received ≥1 dose of defibrotide. Of those patients, 207 (27.4%) patients had AML and 152 (20.1%) patients had ALL as their primary disease. Of the AML patients, 49.8% (103/207) were male, and 50.2% (104/207) were female; median age at HSCT was 23 years (range: 0.5, 74.0 years); and all had allogeneic HSCT. Among the ALL patients, 62.5% (95/152) were male, and 37.5% (57/152) were female; median age at HSCT was 16 years (range: 0.3, 68.0 years); and all had allogeneic HSCT. At Day +100 post-HSCT, observed survival was 45.4% (94/207) among AML patients and 42.8% (65/152) among ALL patients; 50.7% (105/207) and 52.0% (79/152), respectively, had died; and status was not available (ie, no HSCT date recorded, did not have sufficient follow-up, or their data were not available) for 3.9% (8/207) and 5.3% (8/152), respectively. For AML patients, Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rate was 47.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.7%-54.5%; Figure 1); among ALL patients, Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rate was 46.0% (95% CI, 37.7%-53.9%; Figure 2). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 76.8% (159/207) of AML patients and 64.5% (98/152) of ALL patients, with serious AEs in 57.5% (119/207) and 52.6% (80/152), respectively. Treatment-related AEs, as assessed by investigators, occurred in 21.7% (45/207) of AML patients and 17.1% (26/152) of ALL patients (>2% in either group [all <4%]: pulmonary hemorrhage, epistaxis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, hypotension). Treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation developed in 14.5% (30/207) of AML patients and 8.6% (13/152) of ALL patients (>2% in either group [all <3%]: pulmonary hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage); treatment-related deaths occurred in 3.4% (7/207) of AML patients and 2.6% (4/152) of ALL patients, respectively, with none occurring in >1 patient in either subgroup. Conclusions The Day +100 survival rates and safety profile for the AML and ALL subgroups in the expanded-access program were consistent with prior defibrotide studies and analyses of the overall HSCT population in this study. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival at Day +100 were similar between the AML (47.8%) and ALL (46.0%) subgroups. Taken together, these subgroup results affirm the overall efficacy and safety profile of defibrotide in post-HSCT patients with VOD/SOS and underlying acute leukemia. Support: Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Disclosures Richardson: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kernan:The National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health: Research Funding; Gentium: Research Funding. Grupp:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Antin:Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liang:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Other: stock options exercisable for, and other stock awards of, ordinary shares of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. Hume:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Other: stock options exercisable for, and other stock awards of, ordinary shares of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. Tappe:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Other: stock options exercisable for, and other stock awards of, ordinary shares of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. Soiffer:Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Treatment of Adults with Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Blinatumomab in a Real-World Setting: Results from the Neuf Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122931 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2624-2624

Author(s):

Nicolas Boissel ◽

Renato Bassan ◽

Josep-Maria Ribera ◽

Sabina Chiaretti ◽

Robin Foà ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Expanded Access ◽

Expanded Access Program ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Access Program

Introduction: In November 2015, conditional approval of blinatumomab was granted for adults with relapsed and/or refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R Ph- BCP-ALL). Prior to country-specific reimbursement, blinatumomab was made available to patients (pts) who met pre-specified criteria via an expanded access program in specific countries: this included both adults and pediatric pts with diagnosis of R/R Ph- BCP-ALL, R/R Ph+ BCP-ALL, or minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive Ph-/Ph+ ALL. Here, we report on adults with MRD+ BCP-ALL enrolled in this expanded access program with reference to their characteristics and both blinatumomab usage and effectiveness. Methods: The retrospective observational study (NEUF) recruited pts who initiated blinatumomab in the available expanded access setting between 2014 and 2016. Pts were followed from blinatumomab initiation until death, entry into a clinical trial, end of follow-up, or the end of the study period (30 June 2017), whichever occurred first. Efficacy analyses were undertaken on a MRD intention-to-treat basis. MRD response was defined as MRD level <10-4 within first cycle and within the first 2 cycles. MRD assessment was undertaken as per local clinical practice, including flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR): MRD status was then extracted from the patient medical record. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as time from initiation of blinatumomab until date of relapse (blasts in bone marrow >5% or extramedullary relapse after documented response) or death, whichever occurred first. Adverse events were reported separately, according to local regulations. Results: Out of 373 enrolled pts, 109 MRD positive adult ALLs (83 Ph-; 26 Ph+) were included in Italy (53), France (23), Spain (20), Russia (11), and the UK (2). Most patients (76%, n=83) were Ph-. Forty-one percent (n=45) were female and median age was 43 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 27, 55). In their medical history, 16% (n=17 out of 109 MRD positive patients) had a prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The median number of prior salvage therapies was 0 (IQR: 0.0, 1.0). Among blinatumomab co-medications, almost 90% were treated with dexamethasone, 35% (n=36) as pre-phase and 87% (n=92) as pre-medication. Of the 82 pts with evaluable MRD within two cycles of blinatumomab, 83% (n=66) had a MRD response (Table), including 48 with non-detectable MRD and 18 with MRD <10-4. Following blinatumomab initiation, 68% (n=74 out of 109) of pts proceeded to HSCT: 65 (88%) of these patients had documented complete remission with full/partial/incomplete recovery of peripheral blood counts before transplant. The median time from complete response (CR) to HSCT was 2.4 months (range: 1.6, 5.3), with median follow-up time being 18.5 months (IQR: 14.0, 27.7). The median DFS was 27.6 months (IQR: 7.4, not estimable [NE]). Censoring for HSCT increased DFS to 33.0 months (IQR: 8.9, NE). At 24 months following blinatumomab initiation, overall survival ((OS) was 65% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.8, 74.2): when censoring for HSCT, OS was 77.6% (95% CI: 52.8, 88.9); median follow-up time was 4.0 months (IQR: 2.6, 13.7). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the non-relapse mortality following HSCT post-blinatumomab was 6% (95% CI: 1.9, 16.4) at 3 months and 10% (95% CI: 4.6, 22.3) at 12 months. Conclusions: In this large multi-country, multi-site study, blinatumomab was shown to induce molecular response within two cycles in the majority of patients with evaluable MRD. Furthermore, the median DFS was over two years, while two-thirds of pts were still alive 24 months after initiation. This study demonstrates the real-world effectiveness of blinatumomab and is consistent with results from clinical studies (BLAST). Disclosures Boissel: NOVARTIS: Consultancy. Bassan:Shire: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Chiaretti:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Foà:Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Papayannidis:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Alam:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brescianini:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pezzani:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kreuzbauer:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rambaldi:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Cranial Radiation Can be Eliminated in Most Children with T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) and Bortezomib Potentially Improves Survival in Children with T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LL): Results of Children's Oncology Group (COG) Trial AALL1231

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134730 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 11-12 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

David T. Teachey ◽

Meenakshi Devidas ◽

Brent L Wood ◽

Zhiguo Chen ◽

Robert James Hayashi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

De Novo ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cranial Radiation ◽

To Receive ◽

Relapse Rates

Background: The prognosis for patients (pts) with relapsed T-ALL and T-LL is dismal; the primary goal of T-ALL/T-LL treatment is to prevent relapse. AALL1231 was a COG phase 3 clinical trial that randomized children and young adults (age 1-30 years) to a modified augmented BFM (aBFM) backbone +/- the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib during induction and delayed intensification (DI) (1.3mg/m2 x 4 doses per block). Bortezomib was tested in frontline therapy based on strong preclinical data and data in relapse on COG AALL07P1. Pts were stratified as standard (SR), intermediate (IR), or very high risk (VHR), primarily based on disease response: morphologic and minimal residual disease (MRD) at end induction and end consolidation (T-ALL) and radiographic response (T-LL). To eliminate cranial radiation (CXRT) in all pts, (except VHR: Day 29 M3 marrow or EOC MRD >0.1% or pts with overt CNS leukemia at diagnosis, CNS3), the aBFM backbone was modified to use dexamethasone (dex) as the sole corticosteroid and an extra pegaspargase dose was added in both induction and DI, following the MRC strategy. IR pts received a second interim maintenance (IM) phase (one Capizzi MTX; one HD-MTX). Following consolidation, VHR pts received 3 BFM high-risk intensification blocks in lieu of IM. Results: AALL1231 accrued 847 patients (824 eligible and evaluable) of 1400 anticipated from 2014 until early closure in 2017 when COG AALL0434 established that nelarabine (NEL) improved DFS in T-ALL (AALL1231 did not include NEL). The 3-year EFS for Arm A (no bortezomib) vs Arm B (bortezomib) were 81.7±2.4% and 85.1±2.2 % (HR=0.782, p=0.074) (3/31/20 data cut-off; see Table 1 for additional outcomes). SR and IR pts, who account for 95% of pts, had significantly improved EFS on Arm B as compared with Arm A. Yet, VHR patients had improved EFS on Arm A. Patients with T-LL had improved EFS and OS with bortezomib: 3-year EFS (76.5±5.9% vs 88.3±4.5%; p = 0.01); 3-year OS (78.0±5.8% vs 89.5±4.2%, p = 0.007). A similar improvement in EFS and OS was not seen in T-ALL; however, with longer follow-up this may change. No excess toxicity was seen on Arm B. A dex-based Induction did result in lower MRD rates; more T-ALL pts on AALL1231 had Day 29 MRD <0.1% as compared with AALL0434 which used a prednisone-based Induction (AALL1231 Arm A: 69.6%; Arm B: 72.2%; AALL0434: 64.6%; p = 0.02). However, this did not translate into improved survival. Indeed OS, but not EFS was worse on AALL1231 than AALL0434. On-going analyses are investigating the increased mortality on AALL1231, but preliminary analyses suggest a combination of increased toxic deaths and overall poor outcome in the VHR group. On AALL0434, 90.8% of T-ALL pts received CXRT. On AALL1231, 9.5% of subjects were scheduled to receive CXRT (CNS3 T-ALL/T-LL: 5.7%; VHR T-ALL: 4.1%). A comparison of AALL0434 pts that received CXRT with similar AALL1231 pts not receiving CXRT on AALL1231 demonstrated similar EFS (p = 0.14) and OS (p = 0.42) (Table 2). CNS relapse rates were higher in these pts on AALL1231 (4.5%) as compared with AALL0434 (1.7%), but overall relapse rates were the same (6.5% vs 6.4%). Notably the benefit of NEL in AALL0434 was due to reduction of CNS relapses. 128 AALL1231 pts came off protocol therapy after the study was closed for physician or patient/parent choice. Data collection is underway to understand the reasons for removal, including if it was to receive NEL. Conclusions: Outcomes for SR and IR pts with T-ALL and T-LL treated with bortezomib were excellent despite the elimination of prophylactic CXRT. Bortezomib significantly improved 3-year EFS for these groups, comprising ~95% of pts. Outcomes for VHR pts were dismal and worse on the bortezomib arm. T-LL pts had significantly improved EFS and OS with bortezomib on the AALL1231 backbone. This is the first trial to demonstrate an OS benefit for de novo pediatric T-LL with a new agent; however, longer follow-up is needed. Therapy intensification allowed elimination of CXRT in the majority of pts without excessive relapse. These results should be interpreted cautiously as the 3-yr OS on AALL1231 was inferior to AALL0434. Nevertheless, incorporating bortezomib into standard therapy for de novo T-LL appears advantageous. Future COG T-ALL/T-LLy trials will build on the positive findings from AALL0434 and AALL1231, balancing intensity while mitigating toxicity to maintain high cure rates without routine cranial radiation. (MLL, SPH, EAR contributed equally) Disclosures Teachey: Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; La Roche: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy. Dunsmore:Dexcom: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Galardy:Abbott: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Harker-Murray:Regerenon Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Hermiston:Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shimano:Novartis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Dova Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McKay:Immunogen: Current Employment. Bollard:Mana Therapeutics: Other: IP. Loh:Medisix Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Other: Institutional Research Funding. Hunger:Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria. Raetz:Celgene/BMS: Other; Pfizer: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Bortezomib for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia under an IND

Download Full-text

Incidence of Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD/SOS) without Hyperbilirubinemia at Diagnosis and Efficacy of Defibrotide in an Expanded-Access Program

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117173 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2080-2080 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Selim Corbacioglu ◽

Nancy A. Kernan ◽

Antonio Pagliuca ◽

Robert Ryan ◽

William Tappe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Pediatric Patients ◽

Late Onset ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Expanded Access Program ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Elevated Bilirubin ◽

Access Program

Abstract Introduction Hepatic VOD/SOS is a progressive, potentially life-threatening complication early post-HSCT, or of nontransplant chemotherapy. VOD/SOS diagnosis has been based on Baltimore (≤21 days post-HSCT and bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL plus ≥2 of: hepatomegaly, ascites, weight gain ≥5%) or modified Seattle (≤20 days post-HSCT and ≥2 of: bilirubin >2 mg/dL, hepatomegaly or right upper quadrant pain, weight gain [>5% in defibrotide studies]) criteria. Recent European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) VOD/SOS guidelines require elevated bilirubin only for adults diagnosed ≤21 days post-HSCT (the literature suggests bilirubin <2 mg/dL before Day +21 is uncommon) but not for adults with late-onset (diagnosis >21 days post-HSCT) or pediatric patients (~30% of pediatric patients present with anicteric VOD/SOS [ie, bilirubin <2 mg/dL]). EBMT notes that hyperbilirubinemia may be a late finding in the progression of VOD/SOS. Defibrotide is approved to treat hepatic VOD/SOS with renal and/or pulmonary dysfunction post-HSCT in the United States and Canada, and to treat severe hepatic VOD/SOS post-HSCT in patients aged >1 month in the European Union. This post hoc analysis examines incidence of VOD/SOS without elevated bilirubin, and survival in defibrotide-treated, post-HSCT patients in the T-IND program (2007-2016). Methods Prior to US approval, defibrotide was available through the T-IND expanded-access program. The original protocol required VOD/SOS post-HSCT diagnosed per Baltimore criteria (which require hyperbilirubinemia) or biopsy, and multi-organ dysfunction (MOD). The protocol was amended to include patients without MOD (2009) and with VOD/SOS per modified Seattle criteria (which do not require hyperbilirubinemia; 2012). Patients received defibrotide 25 mg/kg/day (6.25 mg/kg q6h) recommended for ≥21 days. Results Of 991 patients in the T-IND with VOD/SOS post-HSCT and recorded bilirubin level at diagnosis, 190 (19%) had bilirubin <2 mg/dL (breakdown by subgroups in the Table), and 801 (81%) had bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL. Of those with bilirubin <2 mg/dL, 133 were pediatric patients aged ≤16 years (24% of all post-HSCT pediatric patients with recorded bilirubin [n=564]), and 57 were adult patients aged >16 years (13% of all post-HSCT adult patients with recorded bilirubin [n=427]). Diagnosis by Day +21 post HSCT (ie, not late onset) was recorded for 135/190 (71%) patients with bilirubin <2 mg/dL (107/133 [80%] pediatric patients; 28/57 [49%] adults). In the overall post-HSCT group treated with defibrotide in the T-IND (n=1000; with and without elevated bilirubin at diagnosis, including 9 patients without bilirubin measurement at diagnosis), Kaplan-Meier estimated Day +100 survival was 58.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.7%-61.9%). Kaplan-Meier estimated Day +100 survival was 85.6% (95% CI, 79.7%-89.9%) for the 190 patients with bilirubin <2 mg/dL at diagnosis and 52.3% (95% CI, 48.7%-55.7%) for the 801 patients with bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL (survival by age subgroups in the Figure). In the overall population of patients with bilirubin <2 mg/dL, 61.1% and 18.4% of patients had ≥1 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) and ≥1 treatment related adverse event (TRAE), respectively, and 21.1% had ≥1 hemorrhage event; for patients with bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL: 73.8% had ≥1 TEAE, 21.7% had ≥1 TRAEs, and 31.1% had ≥1 hemorrhage event. Conclusions: In the T-IND, 19% of post-HSCT patients with VOD/SOS had bilirubin <2 mg/dL at diagnosis, including 24% of children. Accordingly, 190 patients would not have been diagnosed if hyperbilirubinemia was a required criterion. Moreover, enrollment prior to 2012 required hyperbilirubinemia (or biopsy), so this percentage may understate the incidence of anicteric VOD/SOS. Of patients with bilirubin <2 mg/dL, 80% of pediatric patients and 49% of adults were diagnosed with VOD/SOS by Day +21 post-HSCT, suggesting that anicteric VOD/SOS may develop in this timeframe not only in pediatric patients but also in a sizeable number of adult patients. Defibrotide showed higher survival in patients with bilirubin <2 mg/dL compared to those with levels ≥2 mg/dL. These results compare favorably with the overall study findings, suggesting that treatment before the onset of hyperbilirubinemia may lead to better outcomes. The safety profile of the T-IND was similar to that of previous studies of defibrotide for the treatment of VOD/SOS. Support: Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Disclosures Corbacioglu: Gentium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kernan:National Cancer Institute: Research Funding. Pagliuca:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gentium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ryan:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Other: Stock and stock options. Tappe:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Other: Stock and stock options. Richardson:Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Targeted FGFR Inhibition Results in Hematologic and Cytogenetic Remission in a Myeloid Neoplasm Driven By a Novel PCM1-FGFR1 Fusion: Data from an Expanded Access Program

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124100 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5371-5371

Author(s):

Monica Kasbekar ◽

Valentina Nardi ◽

Paola Dal Cin ◽

Andrew M. Brunner ◽

Yi-Bin Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fusion Transcript ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Expanded Access ◽

Myeloid Neoplasm ◽

Expanded Access Program ◽

Lymphoid Neoplasms ◽

Cytogenetic Remission ◽

Access Program

Introduction In 2008, the World Health Organization defined a new classification of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia that result from gene rearrangements of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, and FGFR1. While rearrangements involving PDGFRA and PDGFRB generally respond well to imatinib, those associated with FGFR1 are typically aggressive and require treatment with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Here we present the case of a patient with a previously unreported fusion of PCM1-FGFR1. The patient was treated with an Oral, potent, selective, and irreversible small-molecule inhibitor of FGFR 1- 4 (futibatinib (TAS-120)) under an expanded access program, resulting in the first reported instance of complete hematologic and cytogenetic remission using futibatinib in an FGFR-driven myeloid neoplasm. Results A 55-year-old male presented with dyspnea and fatigue and was found to have peripheral eosinophilia (3,660/microliter) and thrombocytopenia (46,000/microliter). Diagnostic bone marrow biopsy was notable for a hypercellular (cellularity >95%), erythroid dominant marrow with increased eosinophilic forms and increased pronormoblasts. Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies revealed an FGFR1 gene rearrangement in 11.3% of nuclei (normal < 5.7%). The nature of the rearrangement was shown to be a paracentric inversion of chromosome 8p based on the distinct gap between the 5'FGFR1 and 3'FGFR1 probes in metaphase FISH (Figure 1). A validated, targeted next generation sequencing assay for fusion transcript detection (heme fusion assay) revealed a previously unreported PCM1-FGFR1 fusion transcript (40 unique fusion reads), with an in-frame fusion of PCM1 (exons 1-36) to FGFR1 (exons 11-18). No additional clonal markers were identified. The patient was not considered an SCT candidate due to medical comorbidities and was enrolled on a single-patient protocol expanded access program for futibatinib. He was initially treated with prednisone for control of his eosinophilia, and then started on oral therapy with futibatinib (20 mg daily). Within 1 month of initiation of futibatinib, prednisone was tapered without recurrence of eosinophilia and with improvement in platelet count (169,000/microliter). After 6 months, repeat bone marrow biopsy showed a moderately hypocellular marrow with maturing trilineage hematopoiesis. Additionally, the paracentric inversion of chromosome 8p was no longer observed in metaphase FISH, consistent with cytogenetic remission. Furthermore, the PCM1-FGFR1 fusion transcript was no longer detectable by heme fusion assay. The patient has experienced grade 2 skin rash requiring brief dose interruption (7 days) followed by dose reduction to 16 mg daily, on which he remains. He has also experienced grade 2 hyperphosphatemia, a known side effect of futibatinib, which is adequately controlled with sevelamer. The patient continues on futibatinib, with ongoing evidence of hematologic and cytogenetic remission after 11 months of therapy. Conclusions To our knowledge, this case represents the first report of a PCM1-FGFR1 fusion driving a myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia. Treatment with futibatinib has resulted in hematologic and cytogenetic remission, with treatment successfully ongoing after 11 months. Our findings support further exploration of FGFR inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy for myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms driven by FGFR1 rearrangement, particularly in individuals who are not candidates for SCT. A phase 2 study of futibatinib in patients with FGFR1 driven myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms is planned. Disclosures Brunner: Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Chen:Magenta: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Kiadis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Fathi:Amphivena, Kite, Jazz, NewLink Genetics,: Honoraria; Agios, Astellas, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Takeda, Amphivena, Kite, Forty Seven,Trovagene, NewLink genetics, Jazz, Abbvie, and PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Narayan:Genentech: Other: Equity ownership (spouse); Merck: Other: Equity ownership (spouse); Takeda: Other: Employment (spouse). Benhadji:Taiho Oncology: Employment. Hobbs:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Jazz pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Long Term Outcome of Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (Rd) Vs Melphalan-Lenalidomide-Prednisone (MPR) Vs Cyclophosphamide-Prednisone-Lenalidomide (CPR) As Induction Followed By Lenalidomide-Prednisone (RP) Vs Lenalidomide (R) As Maintenance in a Community-Based Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Population: Updated Analysis of EMN01 Phase III Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.901.901 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽

pp. 901-901

Author(s):

Sara Bringhen ◽

Massimo Offidani ◽

Pellegrino Musto ◽

Anna Marina Liberati ◽

Giulia Benevolo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Community Based ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Grade 3 ◽

To Receive

Abstract Introduction : Rd and MPR showed to be effective combinations in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients (pts). Cyclophosphamide is a less toxic alkylating alternative agent. EMN01 is the first trial to formally compare these three different Lenalidomide-based combinations. Maintenance with Lenalidomide has been recently approved in patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Few data are available about the best combination as maintenance in patients not eligible for ASCT. Methods : 662 pts with NDMM were randomized to receive 9 28-day cycles of Rd (lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days; dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1,8,15 and 22 in pts 65-75 years old and 20 mg in those >75 years), MPR (lenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days; melphalan orally 0.18 mg/Kg for 4 days in pts 65-75 years old and 0.13 mg/Kg in >75 years pts; prednisone 1.5 mg/Kg for 4 days) or CPR (lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days; cyclophosphamide orally 50 mg/day for 21 days in pts 65-75 years old and 50 mg every other day in >75 years pts; prednisone 25 mg every other day). After induction, pts were randomized to receive maintenance with lenalidomide alone (R; 10 mg/day for 21 days) or with prednisone (RP; R, 10 mg/day for 21 days and P, 25 mg every other day), until disease progression. Results : Pts characteristics were well balanced in all groups; 217 pts in Rd, 217 in MPR and 220 in CPR arms could be evaluated. After a median follow-up of 63.7 months, median PFS was 23.2 months in MPR, 18.9 months in CPR and 18.6 months in Rd (MPR vs CPR p=0.02; MPR vs Rd p=0.08). Median overall survival (OS) was 79.9 months in MPR, 69.4 months in CPR and 68.1 months in Rd (MPR vs CPR p=0.98; MPR vs Rd p=0.64). The most common grade ≥3 adverse event (AEs) was neutropenia: 64% in MPR, 29% in CPR and 25% in Rd pts (p<0.0001). Grade ≥3 non hematologic AEs were similar among arms. At the end of induction, 402 pts were eligible for maintenance, 198 in the RP and 204 in the R groups. PFS from start of maintenance was 22.2 months in the RP group and 17.6 in the R group, with 20% reduced the risk of death/progression for pts receiving RP maintenance (HR 0.81, p=0.07; Figure 1). A subgroup analysis was performed to determine the consistency of RP vs R treatment effect in different subgroups using interaction terms between treatment and cytogenetic abnormalities, ISS, age, sex, induction treatment and response before maintenance (Figure 1). No difference in OS was observed (HR 1.02, p=0.93) but the OS analysis was limited by the low number of events. Median duration of maintenance was 23.0 months in RP pts and 20.5 months in R pts, 14% and 13% of pts discontinued due to AEs, in RP and R groups, respectively. Conclusion : This phase III trial compared 2 different Lenalidomide-containing induction regimens and 2 different Lenalidomide-containing maintenance regimens in an elderly community-based NDMM population. MPR prolonged PFS by approximately 5 months, yet the higher incidence of hematologic toxicity should be carefully considered. The addition of low-dose prednisone to standard lenalidomide maintenance reduced the risk of death/progression by 20%, with a good safety profile. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Bringhen: Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Karyipharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Offidani: celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Musto: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Gaidano: Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. De Sabbata: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Palumbo: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hájek: Amgen, Takeda, BMS, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharma MAR: Consultancy, Honoraria. Boccadoro: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text