The Clinical and Biological Studies of Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5247-5247
Author(s):  
Aining Sun ◽  
Tongtong Zhang ◽  
Suning Chen ◽  
Wu Depei
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Chromosome Abnormalities ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Median Survival Duration ◽  
Who 2008

Abstract Objective: To analyse systematically the clinical and biological characteristics of 2080 myelodysplastic syndrome patients in our laboratory from 1984 to 2013 and to reveal the unique features of MDS patient in our area. Methods: 1. Conventional cytogenetics were performed to investigated the cytogenetics changes in 2080 MDS patients. All patients were classified according to the FAB criterion, in which, 1493 cases were reclassified according to the WHO (2008) criterion; and 550 patients' outcomes were evaluated according to the International Prognostic Scoring System, WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) and the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). 2. We analysed the clinical, cytogenetic characteristics and survival of 2080 MDS patients by statistical methods. Results: 1. According to the FAB criterion: 1040 (50.0%) patients with RA, 135 (6.5%) patients with RARS, 691 (33.2%) patients with RAEB, 145 (7.0%) patients with RAEB-t, and 69 (3.3%) patients with CMML. The median age was 51 years old (range, 5-93 years old). The ratio of male and female was 1.54. 40.3%(839/2080) patients had clonal chromosome abnormalities, in which 277 (13.3%) patients with complexed karyotype. The rate of karyotype abnormalities was higher in RAEB than that in other subtypes. Survival analysis show that the subgroup with RA had a longer median survival duration than the subgroup with RAS, RAEB, RAEB-t, their median survival duration was 50 months, 32 months, 13months and 16 months, respectively. 2. According to the WHO (2008) criterion: 220 patients (14.7%) with RA/RN/RT/RCUD, 75 patients (5.0%) with RARS, 385 patient (25.8%) with RCMD, 14 patient (0.9%) with 5q- syndrome, 282 patients (18.9%) with RAEB-1, 306 patients (20.5%) with RAEB-2, 211 patients (14.1%) with MDS-U. The ratio of male and female was 1.51 (898/595) and the median age was 54 years old (range, 6-93 years old). In all patients, the median hemoglobin level was 70g/L (11~167 g/L), the median platelet count was 51.5×109/L (2~1045 ×109/L) and the median WBC count was 2.65×109/L (0.11~52×109/L). The rate of clonal chromosome abnormalities was 42.1% (628/1493), in which 216 (14.5%) patients with complexed karyotype. There was statistically significant difference in the rate of chromosomal abnormalities among different subtypes (P<0.01). RA/RN/RT/RCUD had a longer median survival duration than other subgroups, in order of MDS-U, RCMD, RARS, RAEB-1 and RAEB-2. 3. Among 2080 patients, 839 patients with clonal chromosome abnormalities. chromosome aberration types mainly uneven anomalies, the most common trisomies or monomer. The most common abnormity was +8. Other aberrations in frequent order was -7/del(7q), del(20q), del(5q), and so on. 4. Stastistics for survival, 550 patients' outcomes were evaluated according to the IPSS, WPSS and IPSS-R. The results show the IPSS, WPSS and IPSS-R score were significantly affected OS (P<0.001). When comparing the prognostic value of the IPSS, WPSS, and IPSS-R, using the Cox regression model, a significantly higher predictive power for OS became evident for the IPSS-R, compared with the IPSS and WPSS. Conclusion: 1. In our study, the MDS patients showed the unique clinical and biological features. We found that the characteristics of cytogenetics has significant differences from western MDS patients. The most common abnormity was +8. Other aberrations in frequent order was -7/del(7q), del(20q), del(5q), and so on. 2. IPSS-R is a powerful tool in MDS survival analysis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals CIRCULATING microRNA EXPRESSION IN MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 233-237
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Circulating Microrna ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
The Impact

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and cytopenia in peripheral blood, where about a third of patients may develop acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The diagnosis of MDS requires the analysis of peripheral blood and bone marrow. Depending on the percentage of blasts in the bone marrow, the number of cytopenias and cytogenetic abnormalities, determination of the prognostic indices is possible (IPSS – „International Prognostic Scoring System“, R-IPSS-„Revised International Prognostic Scoring System“, WPSS – „WHO Prognostic Scoring System“). Until today, numerous studies have been conducted on the molecular mechanisms and epigenetic pathways in myelodysplastic syndrome, and their prognostic and therapeutic importance, but there are few studies analyzing the importance of microRNAs (miRNAs) in MDS. In the last few years, there have been numerous results on the impact of aberrant miRNA expression in malignant disorders where the miRNA represent tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes. Several miRNAs have been recognized as diagnostic and prognostic parameters and possible therapeutic targets. In this paper, we present the overview of recent results on the role of miRNA in MDS.

Validation of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: A multicenter study

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Neukirchen ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Sabine Blum ◽  
Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽  
Michael Lübbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System

Cancer Research Campaign phase II trial of temozolomide in metastatic melanoma.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 910-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
N M Bleehen ◽  
E S Newlands ◽  
S M Lee ◽  
N Thatcher ◽  
P Selby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Median Survival Duration

PURPOSE Sixty patients with metastatic melanoma were treated in a phase II study with the imidazotetrazine derivative temozolamide to assess further the efficacy demonstrated in previous phase I studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-five of 56 eligible patients were assessable for toxicity and 49 for response. The patients received temozolomide 150 mg/m2/d over 5 successive days orally (total dose, 750 mg/m2) in the first course. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks and the dose was escalated to 200 mg/m2/d x 5 (total dose, 1 g/m2) after the first course if toxicity was acceptable. Patients were all chemotherapy-naive, except for two who had previously received interferon alfa and one who had received interleukin-2 (the latter patient had also received two phase I drugs some time previously). RESULTS A complete response (CR) was documented in three patients (all with lung metastases) and a partial response (PR) in nine patients (21% CR plus PR rate). Seven of 56 patients were not assessable for response because of early death or deterioration. The overall response rate excluding these patients is 12 of 49 (24%). The median response duration was 6 months (range, 2.5 to 22+). Toxicity of the regimen, which was mainly hematopoietic, was low. The median survival duration for all patients was 5.5 months (range, 0.5 to 29.5). For responders, the median survival duration was 14.5 months (range, 3 to 28+), with four patients still alive. CONCLUSION Temozolomide in the schedule used has as good activity in chemotherapy-naive metastatic melanoma as the other most active agents currently in use. Further studies of the drug on its own and in combination with other agents is recommended.

Preoperative chemoradiation followed by transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus: final report.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1118-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Forastiere ◽  
M B Orringer ◽  
C Perez-Tamayo ◽  
S G Urba ◽  
M Zahurak
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Transhiatal Esophagectomy ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiation ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Median Survival Duration

PURPOSE In 1990 we published the results of an intensive 3-week preoperative chemoradiation regimen for locoregional esophageal cancer that suggested improved survival compared with historical controls. We now report the long-term results at a median follow-up of 78.7 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-three patients with locoregional squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia were treated with fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin, and bolus vinblastine concurrent with radiation administered over 21 days. Transhiatal esophagectomy was performed on day 42. RESULTS Forty-one patients (95%) completed the preoperative treatment, and 36 (84%) had a potentially curative resection. Ten of 41 (24%) had no tumor in the resected esophagus and nodal tissues (path-negative group). The median survival duration of all 43 patients registered on study was 29 months; 34% were alive at 5 years. By histology, median survival durations were 32 months for 21 adenocarcinoma patients and 23 months for 22 squamous cell patients, with corresponding 5-year survival rates of 34% and 31%, respectively. Analysis of the 36 patients who underwent a potentially curative resection demonstrated median survival durations of 32 and 44 months and 5-year survival rates of 36% and 43%, respectively, for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell histologies. Path-negative (complete response [CR]) patients had a median survival duration of 70 months and 60% were alive at 5 years, while those patients with residual tumor in the resected esophagus had a median survival duration of 26 months and 32% were alive at 5 years (P = .114 by the log-rank test and P = .04 by the Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSION The results of this regimen appear improved over those reported with surgery alone, with an approximate doubling of the 5-year survival rate. Thirty-two percent of patients with residual tumor in the esophageal specimen are long-term survivors, which suggests a benefit from esophagectomy. A randomized trial is in progress to compare this preoperative regimen with immediate surgery.

scholarly journals Proposal for a new risk model in myelodysplastic syndrome that accounts for events not considered in the original International Prognostic Scoring System

Cancer ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 113 (6) ◽  
pp. 1351-1361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Jianqin Shan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Risk Model ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System

scholarly journals Marrow Blast Percentage Impact on High-Grade Myelodysplastic Syndrome By the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5510-5510
Author(s):  
Omar Alkharabsheh ◽  
Mrinal M. Patnaik ◽  
Naseema Gangat ◽  
Kebede H. Begna ◽  
Hassan B. Alkhateeb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Survival Difference ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Very High

Abstract Introduction: The revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is widely accepted and has been validated in multiple studies. Patients with adverse cytogenetics do poorly and that is reflected in this scoring system by having the highest score for cytogenetics; 2 for intermediate, 3 for poor and 4 for very poor. Little is known about the effect of marrow blasts in adverse cytogenetic in the high-grade MDS defined by IPSS-R intermediate (>3), high (>4.5) and very high (>5). The goal is to examine the effect of marrow blast percentage on outcome in patients with adverse cytogenetics that is present in the high-grade MDS. Methods: We performed data collection from the Mayo clinic records for patients with confirmed MDS after obtaining appropriate IRB approval. Patients were divided based on their total IPSS-R score and we extracted high-grade MDS cases with intermediate, high and very-high IPSS-R only. Cytogenetics and baseline CBC were available for analysis. We calculated the survival difference in patients with blasts <5% and patient with blasts of 5% to 19% for every group. Survival estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank testing using JMP v.13. Results: Our database had 1300 patients with confirmed MDS, 41% (N=536) are high-grade MDS. From those, the median age was 70 and 70% were males. Median bone marrow blast was 6% (0-19). Baseline hemoglobin is 9.2 g/dL, WBC 2.7, ANC 1.05, and platelets 69. Their cytogenetics were 1% very good, 31% good, 23% intermediate, 16% poor and 29% very poor. The total IPSS-R groups were 39%,31%, and 30% for the intermediate, high, and very-high groups respectively. The overall survival (OS) for the high-grade MDS with marrow blast <5% was 12.3 months and for patients with marrow blasts ≥5% 11.4 months (P=.4). At each high-grade MDS; intermediate, high and very high, there were no statistically significant differences for patients with marrow blasts below or above 5%. In term of risk of progression to AML, patients with blasts ≥5% were at higher risk of progression compared with <5% (25% vs 10% , P<.001), with no statistically significant difference in term of time-to-AML progression. Conclusion: The percentages of bone marrow blasts had no impact on overall survival among patients with high grade MDS. However, patients with ≥5% marrow blasts are at a higher risk for progression to AML. Disclosures Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding.

Simple prognostic model to predict survival in patients with undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1720-1725 ◽  
Author(s):  
A van der Gaast ◽  
J Verweij ◽  
A S Planting ◽  
W C Hop ◽  
G Stoter
Keyword(s):  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Site ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Unknown Primary Site ◽  
Carcinoma Of Unknown Primary ◽  
Median Survival Duration

PURPOSE We performed this study to identify prognostic factors in a subgroup of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site treated with cisplatin combination chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-nine patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site were treated on two consecutive phase II chemotherapy protocols. The first protocol consisted of treatment with 3-week courses of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP). In the second protocol, cisplatin was administered weekly combined with oral administration of etoposide (DDP/VP). To identify prognostic factors, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS In the univariate analysis, performance status, histology, liver or bone metastases, and serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and AST were significant variables to predict survival. In the multivariate analysis, performance status and alkaline phosphatase were the most important prognostic factors. CONCLUSION Good-prognosis patients had a performance score of 0 (World Health Organization [WHO]) and an alkaline phosphatase serum level less than 1.25 times the upper limit of normal (N). These patients had a median survival duration greater than 4 years. Intermediate-prognosis patients were characterized by either a WHO performance status < or = 1 or an alkaline phosphatase level > or = 1.25 N. These patients had a median survival duration of 10 months and a 4-year survival rate of only 15%. The poor-prognosis group had both a WHO performance status > or = 1 and an alkaline phosphatase level > or = 1.25 N. These patients had a median survival duration of only 4 months and none survived beyond 14 months. Treatment strategies for these three groups are discussed. It is suggested that this prognostic model be validated in other patients series.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document