Low Dose Secondary/Tertiary Prophylaxis Is Feasible and Effective in Resource Limited Setting in South India for Children with Hemophilia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2336-2336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Sidharthan ◽  
Vijayakumar Narayana Pillai ◽  
Sheena Mathew ◽  
Remya Sudevan ◽  
Dinkar Viswam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
School Absenteeism ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Hospitalization Rates

Abstract Prophylaxis for Hemophilia is globally accepted as a treatment strategy compared to on-demand therapy in the care of persons with hemophilia (PwH) . Prophylaxis is rarely practized in low and middle income countries due to several reasons such as ill-affordability of clotting factor concentrates ( CFCs), lack of awareness, absence of comprehensive / home care infrastructure and misconcepts regarding treatment among general population. The South Indian state of Kerala had been providing CFCs free of cost for on-demand treatment. A recent initiative was started in Hemophilia Treatment Centre(HTC), Aluva , Ernakulam district to provide secondary/tertiary prophylaxis free of cost to children with severe hemophilia (Factor level <1%, aged 5-15 yrs) as a joint effort from HTC and the local government. A clinical audit was done in 11 children at this center for a period of twelve months (6 months retrospectively for on-demand treatment and 6 months prospectively for prophylactic treatment). Among all patients with severe hemophilia, eight have Hemophilia A and the remaining three have Hemophilia B. They were previously treated with CFCs/plasma/cryoprecipitate, a few of them had established joint disease and all of them had absence of inhibitors. These children were initiated on low dose prophylaxis with plasma derived CFCs. Factor VIII concentrate was given at a dose of 20-40 U/kg in 2 divided doses per week for Hemophilia A and Factor IX concentrate at 25-40 U/Kg once a week for Hemophilia B. Outcomes were measured at two time points - at the end of secondary/tertiary prophylactic treatment period and at the end of preceding six months of on-demand treatment. The variables taken as outcome measures were changes in bleed rates, Hemophilia joint health score (HJHS), Functional independence score in Hemophilia (FISH), hospitalization rates and school absenteeism. A reduction in the bleed rate was seen from the transition of on demand treatment to secondary/tertiary prophylactic treatment (14.9 vs 0.91, p 0.005). Similar reductions were seen for hospitalization rates (12.45 vs 2.36 days, p 0.005) and school absenteeism (78.55 vs 1.27 days, p 0.01) respectively(Fig 1 a). FISH and HJHS scores were either maintained or improved during the prophylaxis period.(Fig 1b, 1c). None of the children developed inhibitors during the study period. The estimated cost of CFCs for on demand treatment per patient was 1314.4 USD and 1691.8USD during prophylaxis. The factor consumption for on demand treatment for 6 months was 968.24 IU/Kg and that of secondary/tertiary prophylaxis was 1077.96 IU/Kg respectively. We conclude that low dose prophylaxis for severe Hemophilia in a developing economy is feasible and has marked clinical benefits with greater well-being when compared to on demand therapy. In countries with resource constraints low dose secondary/tertiary prophylaxis should be considered as a therapeutic option over on demand therapy for children with severe Hemophilia in the light of its potential benefits . Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals The results of the use of Octofactor in patients with moderate and severe hemophilia A (data from a prospective, multicenter, open-label, observational study)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-47
Author(s):  
N. I. Zozulya ◽  
O. I. Yastrubinetskaya ◽  
S. S. Belyaeva ◽  
V. M. Potapkova ◽  
I. L. Davydkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Medical Practice ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Spontaneous Bleeding ◽  
On Demand

Relevance. In accordance with the guidelines on the clinical investigation of clotting factor VIII products of the European Medicines Agency and guidelines on pharmacovigilance of the Eurasian Economic Union, after registration of a new drug, it is recommended to study its efficacy and safety on a large population of patients in a standard medical practice to clarify and identify new data.Materials and methods. In a prospective, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled observational study, the efficacy and safety of the domestic recombinant B-domain deleted blood clotting factor FVIII (FVIII) (moroctocog alfa, Octofactor®, JSC “GENERIUM”) in patients with moderate and severe hemophilia A in the context of standard medical practice (study protocol number CI-51/15). Patients received the drug in terms of standard medical practice for the purpose of prophylactic treatment or on demand treatment. For prophylactic treatment Octofactor was administered to patients according to the instructions for medical use in a single dose of 20–40 IU/kg every 2–3 days. In the case of bleeding a single dose of Octofactor was calculated taking into account the severity and localization of bleeding in accordance with the instructions for medical use. The results of the treatment were analyzed for a period of 52 ± 2 weeks. The main parameter for evaluating the efficacy was the frequency of spontaneous bleeding that occurred within 48–72 hours after the administration of the Octofactor. Additional parameters for evaluating the efficacy included: the severity of spontaneous bleeding arising during the prophylactic treatment; the number of injections and the total dose of the Octofactor to stop 1 episode of bleeding; the amount of Octofactor used during the entire observation period (52 ± 2 weeks) and for 1 month both for prophylaxis and for stopping the bleeding that occurred; an indicator of the efficacy of therapy on the scale for determining the response to treatment of acute hemarthrosis (World Federation of Hemophilia, WFH).Results.According to the results of the screening survey 237 male patients aged from 19 to 78 years old (mean age 35.2 ± 11.1 years) with moderate and severe hemophilia A (FAS-population) were included in the study. The efficacy of therapy was evaluated in 202 patients who underwent all the planned procedures during the observation period (PP-population). 193 (95.5 %) patients received prophylactic treatment, 9 (4.5 %) patients received on-demand treatment. Evaluation of the efficacy of treatment was carried out on the basis of basic and additional parameters. The main parameter for evaluating the efficacy – the frequency of spontaneous bleeding that occurred within 48–72 hours after the administration of the Octofactor – was 52 ± 2 weeks within 1.4 ± 2.9 cases. At the same time, the proportion of spontaneous bleeding that occurred within 48–72 hours after administration of the Octofactor preparation was 45.2 % of the total number of spontaneous bleeding and 15.6 % of the total number of all bleeding in patients who received prophylactic treatment. Among 608 spontaneous bleeding that occurred in patients receiving prophylactic treatment, 287 (47.2 %) of the bleeding were mild, 289 (47.5 %) were moderate and 32 (5.3 %) were heavy. Of the 275 spontaneous bleeding that occurred within 48–72 hours after administration of the study drug for prophylactic purposes, 117 (42.5 %) episodes were mild, 146 (53.1 %) were moderate, and 12 (4.4 %) were severe. With prophylactic administration the average single dose of the Octofactor was 2036.3 ± 884.7 IU, or 27.3 ± 11.2 IU/kg, in the treatment of bleeding occured during prophylactic treatment – 2227.7 ± 1087 IU, in the treatment of bleeding in patients receiving the drug only on demand – 2280.7 ± 1037.2 IU. The average monthly intake of the drug by one patient in prophylactic treatment was 19.75 ± 9.75 thousand IU, while the average monthly consumption of the drug for preventing bleeding from one patient was 17.16 ± 9.13 thousand IU for stopping bleeding against the background prevention – 3.87 ± 3.97 thousand IU. One patient who received on-demand treatment had an average monthly average of 13.47 ± 13.46 thousand IU of the Octofactor preparation. For stopping 1 bleeding, on average, 1.7 ± 1.7 injections of the Octofactor preparation were required, in the prophylactic treatment group – 1.8 ± 1.8, and in the on-demand treatment group – 1.5 ± 1.1. In the overwhelming majority of cases, patients of both groups showed excellent and good response to all treatment of acute hemarthrosis on the scale of the WFH on all visits, the reaction was moderate in a few episodes, and only in 1 case of acute hemarthrosis there was no response to the drug administration. The safety of therapy was evaluated in 228 patients who received at least 1 Octofactor administration during the study (mITT-population). There were 66 adverse events in 40 patients, 10 of them were associated with the use of the drug, the most significant of which were the formation of inhibiting antibodies to FVIII in low titer (1.5 U) in 1 patient and the development of allergic reactions in 2 patients.Conclusions.Under the conditions of standard medical practice the efficacy and safety of Octofactor was confirmed for both prophylactic treatment and on-demand bleeding treatment in adult patients with severe and moderate hemophilia A.

scholarly journals Effects of replacement therapies with clotting factors in patients with hemophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0262273
Author(s):  
Carolina J. Delgado-Flores ◽  
David García-Gomero ◽  
Stefany Salvador-Salvador ◽  
José Montes-Alvis ◽  
Celina Herrera-Cunti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Episodic Treatment ◽  
Grade Methodology ◽  
Inform Decision Making ◽  
Intermediate Dose

Background Different prophylactic and episodic clotting factor treatments are used in the management of hemophilia. A summarize of the evidence is needed inform decision-making. Objective To compare the effects of factor replacement therapies in patients with hemophilia. Methods We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Central Cochrane Library, and Scopus. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to December 2020, which compared different factor replacement therapies in patients with hemophilia. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed whenever possible. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021225857). Results Nine RCTs were included in this review, of which six compared episodic with prophylactic treatment, all of them performed in patients with hemophilia A. Pooled results showed that, compared to the episodic treatment group, the annualized bleeding rate was lower in the low-dose prophylactic group (ratio of means [RM]: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.43), intermediate-dose prophylactic group (RM: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.36), and high-dose prophylactic group (RM: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.13). With significant difference between these subgroups (p = 0.003, I2 = 82.9%). In addition, compared to the episodic treatment group, the annualized joint bleeding rate was lower in the low-dose prophylactic group (RM: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.43), intermediate-dose prophylactic group (RM of 0.14, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.27), and high-dose prophylactic group (RM of 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.16). Without significant subgroup differences. The certainty of the evidence was very low for all outcomes according to GRADE methodology. The other studies compared different types of clotting factor concentrates (CFCs), assessed pharmacokinetic prophylaxis, or compared different frequencies of medication administration. Conclusions Our results suggest that prophylactic treatment (at either low, intermediate, or high doses) is superior to episodic treatment for bleeding prevention. In patients with hemophilia A, the bleeding rate seems to have a dose-response effect. However, no study compared different doses of prophylactic treatment, and all results had a very low certainty of the evidence. Thus, future studies are needed to confirm these results and inform decision making.

scholarly journals Impact of Systematic Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profiles in a Cohort of 29 Patients Treated with Conventional and Extended-Half Life (EHL) Products

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1123-1123
Author(s):  
Teresa Ceglie ◽  
Berardino Pollio ◽  
Irene Ricca ◽  
Maria Messina ◽  
Claudia Linari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Factor Ix ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Null Mutation ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Factor Level ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Active Life ◽  
Genetic Assessment

Introduction. Prophylaxis with factor concentrates reduces bleeding events and improves quality of life for adults and children with severe hemophilia. However, the optimal dosing and infusion frequency is not yet established. Integration of PK data into decision making is gaining support, in particular at the transition between conventional and EHL products. Here we report about 29 PK data of patients affected by hemophilia treated at our centre since childhood. Improved quality of life was our first aim, supposed that decreasing frequency of infusions or increasing the target through factor level allows a more active life without increased risk of bleeding. Patients' characteristics and methods. 18 patients (62%) were ≤ 18 years of age at PK time. 16 were affected by severe hemophilia A, 5 by moderate hemophilia A, 6 by severe hemophilia B and 2 by moderate hemophilia B. At PK time, 28 patients were on prophylaxis and 1 was on demand with recombinant factor IX. Median age at onset of prophylaxis was 9 years (range 3 months-38 years). Genetic assessment was available in 24 patients. Of these, 37.5% and 62.5% were carriers of null and not null mutations respectively. 4 patients were undergone to PK with standard products (1 Octocog alfa, 1 Simoctocog alfa, 1 Octocog alfa-Kovaltry®, 1 Turoctocog alfa) in order to define timing and dosage of successive infusions, while 25 patients switched to EHL factors (15 Efmoroctocog alfa, 2 Ionoctocog alfa, 7 Albutrepenonacog alfa, 1 Eftrenonacog alfa). In 15 patients a population-based PK (popPK) according to WAPPS-Hemo program was also performed. The annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was counted from patient's home bleeding records for one year before PK until now. Results. According to PK data, 21 patients (75%) decreased infusion frequency (100% hemophilia B and 67% hemophilia A patients). The remaining 7 hemophilia A patients maintained the same timing in order to increase the through factor level. Notably, 1 hemophilia B patient switched from on demand treatment to prophylaxis with EHL product due to the more acceptable schedule. 66% of null mutation patients and 73% of not null mutation patients decreased timing. Of 28 patients available at follow-up, 32%, 50% and 18% decreased, increased and maintained the same annual average factor consumption/kg, respectively. All patients had a good adherence after switch. In particular, the on demand patient started a regular prophylaxis with optimal compliance. ABR displayed a reduction with a median of 0 (range 0-5) after PK analysis compared to 1 (range 0-12) before the switch. Full PK vs popPK data obtained using at least two individual PK sampling points were almost similar. Conclusions. Our results remark the necessity of PK study especially in children due to the inter-individual variability independent of genetic assessment. Regarding factor IX, PK allowed us to propose timing even longer than that recommended by prescribing indications resulting in a better personalized prophylaxis. Moreover, our study demonstrates that a full PK analysis is feasible also in children. However, given similar results, popPK could be more feasible in most patients. Regarding consumption, the reduction of only 32% of patients reflects our aim to maintain a high safety profile in an active pediatric population. Nevertheless, the mean annualized consumption was just 0.6-fold increased in the remaining patients. This approach led us to further reduce ABR and in some cases to obtain a persistent no-bleeding status even with a full active life. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Incidence and Outcome of Discontinuation of Prophylactic Treatment among Young Adults with Severe Hemophilia.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3086-3086
Author(s):  
Karin van Dijk ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Johanna G. van der Bom ◽  
Elma Scheibel ◽  
Jørgen Ingerslev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Clinical Score ◽  
Annual Number ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
On Demand

Abstract Introduction Most of the current discussion about prophylaxis for severe hemophilia patients is on the dose and when to start. However, as hemophilia is a chronic disease, it is important to evaluate the duration of prophylaxis. The aim of this study was to study and compare adherence to prophylaxis and outcome of severe hemophilia patients. Methods All patients with severe hemophilia A and B (factor VIII/IX&lt;0.01 IU/ml), born between 1970 and 1980 and treated in Copenhagen, Århus (Denmark) or the Van Creveldkliniek, Utrecht (The Netherlands) were studied. Data on treatment were collected from the patients’ files from 1972 until 2003. In addition, a questionnaire on adherence to prophylaxis was used. For assessment of outcome the clinical score according to Gilbert and the radiological Pettersson score were used. Patients were categorized according to adherence to prophylactic treatment: patients who never discontinued prophylaxis (never), patients who temporarily discontinued prophylaxis (temporarily) and patients had switched to on demand regimen (permanently). Results 83 patients were studied. Median follow up was 19 years (range 6–29). Median age at start of prophylaxis was 5.9 years (interquartile range (IQR) 4.0–8.7). 34% of patients stopped taking prophylaxis temporarily and 35% stopped taking prophylaxis permanently at a median age of 21.5 years (IQR 18.4–24.4). Follow up since the last stop was 3.6 years (IQR 1.4–7.9), the annual number of joint bleeds on on demand treatment was 3.0 (IQR 1.4–8.7). The median clinical score was 3.0 points (IQR 1.0–6.0) in patients who never or temporarily stopped and 4.0 (IQR 0.0–6.3) in patients who permanently stopped taking prophylaxis. Pettersson scores were available for the Dutch patients and the median Pettersson score was 13 points (IQR 5–23) for patients who never or temporarily stopped and 13 (IQR 1–24) for patients who stopped permanently. The proportion of patients who discontinued prophylaxis and outcome parameters were similar for the Dutch and Danish patients. Conclusion Two thirds of young adults with severe hemophilia on prophylaxis discontinue prophylaxis at least once. One third permanently stop taking prophylaxis, while maintaining a low joint bleed frequency. Four years after switching to on demand treatment, outcome in these patients is similar to outcome in patients who continue taking prophylaxis.

Consumption Of FVIII Concentrate During On-Demand and Prophylactic Treatment With Human-cl rhFVIII In Prospective Clinical Studies In Adult Patients With Severe Hemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3595-3595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Tiede ◽  
Sigurd Knaub ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Johann Bichler
Keyword(s):  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Human Cell Line ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
On Demand

Abstract Background There is ample evidence to support prophylactic treatment with factor VIII (FVIII) in children with severe hemophilia A (HA). Adults with severe HA are often treated on-demand and the potential benefit of regular prophylaxis is linked to a higher consumption of FVIII concentrates. During the clinical development of Human-cl rhFVIII, the first recombinant FVIII concentrate from a human cell line, its efficacy and safety was evaluated in previously treated adult patients (PTPs) during on-demand treatment only (GENA-01) and prophylaxis (GENA-08). Aims To compare post-hoc the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and the consumption of FVIII concentrate in patients treated exclusively on-demand with those treated prophylactically. Methods Both prospective multi-centre studies were approved by the Ethics Committees of each participating institution and informed consent was obtained from the patient prior to any trial activity. In GENA-01, patients were to be treated on-demand for ≥6 months and ≥50 exposure days with protocol recommended doses ranging from 20 to 60 IU/kg, depending on the severity of the bleed. In GENA-08, patients were to be treated prophylactically with Human-cl rhFVIII every other day with 30-40 IU/kg for ≥6 months. Human-cl rhFVIII was also to be used in case of breakthrough bleeds. Results 22 PTPs with severe HA were enrolled in GENA-01, and 32 in GENA-08. The study populations were reasonably well comparable to each other (GENA-01 vs. GENA-08, mean±SD), regarding age (39.6±14.1 vs. 37.3±13.6 years), body mass index (23.9±4.8 vs. 25.8±4.9 kg/m2), hemophilia joint health score (38.4±30.3 vs. 34.6±32.2), race (>80% White in both studies) and historical bleeding sites. In GENA-08, the majority of patients (65.6%) had been treated prophylactically prior to study entry. Their historical mean±SD ABR was 6.6 ±11.3 (median: 2.0, range: 0-48.7) and their mean prophylactic dose/month was 293 IU/kg. The other 11 patients who had been treated on-demand had a mean±SD ABR of 47.4±34.6 (median: 36.5, range: 12.2-121.7). In GENA-01, all but 2 patients were treated on-demand prior to study entry. The historical mean±SD ABR of all GENA-01 patients was 49.5±35.9 (median: 44.6, range: 2.0-158.7). The ABR and FVIII consumption during the studies are shown in Table 1. Conclusion The data suggest that regular prophylactic treatment with Human-cl rhFVIII in adult PTPs with severe HA resulted in an approximately 25-fold reduction of bleeding rate, and a 3-fold increase of FVIII concentrate consumption. Disclosures: Tiede: Octapharma AG: Consultancy, Investigator Other. Knaub:Octapharma AG: Employment. Oldenburg:Octapharma AG: Consultancy, Investigator Other. Bichler:Octapharma AG: Employment.

scholarly journals Real World Use of Extended Half-Life Products and the Impact on Bleeding Events and Joint Health in the United States

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1195-1195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn M. Malec ◽  
Char M Witmer ◽  
Julie Jaffray ◽  
Peter A. Kouides ◽  
Kristina M. Haley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Joint Health

Abstract Background : The hemophilia treatment landscape has evolved substantially in the last several years with the approval of extended half-life (EHL) products which reduce the burden of prophylaxis. Data reported from the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) as of June 2017 indicate that 21% of patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A, and 42% of patients with moderate or severe hemophilia B, receive prophylaxis utilizing an EHL. As new treatments become available and are adopted into practice, it is important to recognize the need for evaluation of efficacy, safety, and economic impact of their use outside of the clinical trial setting. We aimed to characterize the real world impact of EHL products by collecting detailed information on bleeding rates, joint health and quality of life amongst patients cared for at ATHN-affiliated Hemophilia Treatment Centers. We hypothesized that use of EHL products were utilized in at least 30% of patients and would lead to decreased ABRs and improved joint health. To date 67 of a planned 135 subjects have been enrolled, constituting this interim analysis. Methods:Subjects were recruited from seven U.S. Hemophilia Treatment Centers. Subjects with severe hemophilia A or B ≤ 30 years of age on prophylaxis or demand therapy were eligible for enrollment. Subjects excluded from study were those with a recent joint bleed (within the last 2 weeks) or those unwilling to complete all elements of the study. Data were collected during a one-time encounter concurrent with an appointment for clinical evaluation, including demographic information, treatment regimen, product type, frequency, location and severity of all bleeds, Hemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS), and Quality of life (QoL). Bleeding rates in subjects receiving prophylaxis were compared with those receiving on demand therapy by type treatment, EHL vs standard half-life (SHL), and by hemophilia type. Severity of bleeding events (mild, moderate, or severe) and HJHS were compared by prophylaxis groups. Results: A total of 67 patients were enrolled and eligible for analysis. This included 58 subjects with severe hemophilia A, and 9 subjects with severe hemophilia B. The mean age of the cohort was 15 years (median 12 years, IQR 8 - 21 years). For these patients whose race information was known, 89.1% were Caucasian, 3.3% African-American, 3.3% Asian, and 4.7% were of mixed or 'other' race. Eleven out of 61 (18.0%) subjects with known ethnicity were Hispanic. Among 59 patients whose treatment type were available, the majority were on prophylaxis (n=53; 89.8%) as compared to on demand therapy (n=6; 10.2%). The average annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 2.8 amongst all individuals. As expected, the ABR was substantially lower in those receiving prophylaxis (ABR=1.0) as compared to on demand therapy (ABR=18.6) (p<0.001). Additionally, HJHS in those receiving prophylaxis was lower (mean HJHS= 3.9), meaning less evidence of joint damage, than in those receiving demand therapy (mean HJHS= 8.8) (p=0.162). For patients with severe hemophilia A, the ABR was lower in those individuals receiving EHL (ABR= 0.5) versus SHL (ABR= 1.5), although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.136). All subjects with severe hemophilia B enrolled to date receive EHL products (n=9) therefore no comparison of ABR could be made between EHL and SHL products; the ABR in this group was 0.9. In patients with severe hemophilia A, there was a higher HJHS for those receiving EHL (mean HJHS= 7.0) versus those receiving SHL (mean HJHS = 2.1) (p=0.053). For patients with severe hemophilia B, all of whom received EHL, the mean HJHS was lower than in the hemophilia A cohort (mean HJHS=1.2). Conclusions: We report real-world bleeding events and joint health in patients with severe hemophilia A and B utilizing EHL and SHL products across a wide U.S. geographic distribution. As anticipated, there is substantial bleed reduction with prophylaxis versus on demand therapy. In our severe hemophilia A cohort, the ABR for patients receiving EHL products was similar to ABRs reported in clinical trials, suggesting clinical trial data may be reflective of real world use. Patients with severe hemophilia A receiving EHL for prophylaxis had a lower ABR than those receiving SHL, although the early impact is not reflected in the HJHS score. Longer follow-up will be necessary to determine the impact of EHL on HJHS. Disclosures Malec: Bioverativ: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy. Jaffray:Octapharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kouides:UniQure: Other: DSMB; Octapharma: Research Funding. Sidonio:Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board; Shire: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Other: Advisory Board; Kedrion: Research Funding; Biomarin: Other: Advisory Board; Grifols: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Uniqure: Other: Advisory Board. Abshire:CSL: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Other: DSMB. White:Asklepios: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Shire: Other: Physician Leadership Group; Bayer: Other: GRAC; Bioverativ: Other: DSMB; Biomarin: Other: DSMB; Invitrox: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Pfizer: Equity Ownership. Ragni:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; SPARK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Sangamo: Research Funding; MOGAM: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Once-Weekly Prophylactic Treatment Versus on-Demand Treatment of Nonacog Alfa in Patients with Moderately Severe to Severe Hemophilia B

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1523-1523
Author(s):  
Kaan Kavakli ◽  
Lynne Smith ◽  
Kazimierz Kuliczkowski ◽  
Joan Korth-Bradley ◽  
Chur Woo You ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Stock Ownership ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Scientific Congress

Abstract Introduction: Hemophilia B is characterized by a functional deficiency in factor IX (FIX), which results in spontaneous or trauma-induced bleeding into soft tissue, muscles, and joints. Replacing deficient FIX with plasma-derived or recombinant FIX products, either prophylactically or on an on-demand basis, is a mainstay in the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia B. A previous study of patients with moderately severe to severe hemophilia B compared the efficacy and safety of 2 secondary prophylaxis regimens of a recombinant coagulation FIX product (nonacog alfa, 50 IU/kg twice weekly or 100 IU/kg once weekly) with on-demand treatment. The study found a significant reduction (P<.0001) in the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for the prophylaxis regimens compared with on-demand therapy. No significant differences in the ABR were observed between the once-weekly and twice-weekly prophylaxis regimens, and safety and tolerability profiles were similar for both. Objective: To demonstrate that once-weekly prophylaxis with nonacog alfa reduces the ABR compared with on-demand treatment in patients with moderately severe to severe hemophilia B. Methods: This open-label, 2-period study enrolled males aged 12 to 65 years with moderately severe to severe hemophilia B (FIX plasma activity ≤2%), ≥100 prior exposure days to FIX products, and no history of or current FIX inhibitor. Patients received on-demand therapy with nonacog alfa for 6 months (dose selected at the investigator's discretion) followed by prophylactic treatment with nonacog alfa 100 IU/kg once weekly for 12 months. Recovery was assessed on day 1, week 26, and week 78, after a 72-hour washout from any FIX product. Plasma samples were collected before administration and at 30 minutes after nonacog alfa infusion. The primary efficacy end point was the ABR (number of bleeding events/[days on treatment period/365.25]). Secondary end points included the response to on-demand treatment of a bleeding event, incidence of less-than-expected therapeutic effect (LETE) in the prophylaxis setting; and FIX inhibitor development. Safety was also assessed. Results: In total, 25 patients were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of study medication; all patients completed the study. Mean ±SD age was 31.3 ±12.6 years; 5 patients were <18 years; 9 patients were Asian and 16 were white. ABR results are summarized in the Table; ABR for the prophylaxis period was significantly lower (P<.0001) than the ABR for the on-demand period. Of the 507 bleeding events treated over the study, 271 (53.5%) first infusions resulted in an “excellent” response and 177 (34.9%) resulted in a “good” response; the majority of bleeding events (416/507; 82.1%) resolved with 1 infusion. Of the 1254 prophylaxis infusions administered during the study, none were associated with an occurrence of LETE. No patient developed a FIX inhibitor or experienced a thrombotic event during the study. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent AEs (≥20%) were inappropriate schedule of drug administration (24%), arthralgia (20%), upper respiratory tract infection (20%), and toothache (20%) during the prophylaxis period, and headache (32%) and arthralgia (20%) during the on-demand period. Five patients (20%) experienced a total of 6 serious AEs; blood pressure decreased, pain resulting in hospitalization, chicken pox, lipoma, and nephrolithiasis (2 events in 1 patient). Only the serious AE of blood pressure decreased was considered related to study drug. No deaths occurred during the study. Conclusions: Prophylactic treatment with nonacog alfa 100 IU/kg once weekly significantly reduced the number of bleeding events compared with on-demand treatment in patients with moderately severe to severe hemophilia B. Nonacog alfa 100 IU/kg once weekly was well tolerated; no new safety issues were observed. Table. Comparison of Annualized Bleed Rates Between On-Demand and Prophylaxis Regimens Parameter On-Demand (n=25) 100 IU/kg Once-Weekly Prophylaxis (n=25) Over 6 Months Mean (SD) 32.9 (17.4) 3.6 (4.6)* Median 33.6 2.0 Minimum, maximum 6.1, 69.0 0, 13.8 Spontaneous bleeding events Mean (SD) 23.1 (17.1) 2.6 (4.1) Median 22.4 1.0 Minimum, maximum 0, 54.2 0, 13.8 Traumatic bleeding events Mean (SD) 9.9 (14.5) 1.0 (1.6) Median 4.1 1.0 Minimum, maximum 0, 52.2 0, 6.9 *P<.0001 for comparison of on-demand vs prophylaxis treatment. Disclosures Kavakli: Pfizer Inc.: Honoraria; Pfizer Inc.: Scientific Congress Expenses, Scientific Congress Expenses Other; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Smith:Pfizer Inc.: Employment; Pfizer Inc.: Stock Ownership, Stock Ownership Other. Korth-Bradley:Pfizer Inc.: Employment; Pfizer Inc.: Stock Ownership, Stock Ownership Other. Fuiman:Pfizer Inc.: Stock Ownership, Stock Ownership Other; Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Zupancic-Salek:Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding. Rendo:Pfizer Inc.: Employment; Pfizer Inc.: Stock Ownership, Stock Ownership Other.

RESULTS OF THE OPEN MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY OF THE EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF MOROCTOCOG ALPHA IN 6 TO 12 YEAR OLD CHILDREN WITH HEMOPHILIA A

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-245
Author(s):  
M.A. Timofeeva ◽  
◽  
T.A. Andreeva ◽  
V.V. Vdovin ◽  
A.N. Mamaev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Drug Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Spontaneous Bleeding ◽  
On Demand

Currently, the main method of treatment for hemophilia A is replacement therapy with drugs of blood coagulation factors VIII (FVIII). As a result of the development of new production technologies, recombinant FVIII are increasingly used for the treatment of hemophilia A. The justification for the use of new drugs in pediatric clinical practice requires careful preparation and clinical research studies of their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of domestic B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII of Moroctocog alpha (Octofactor, GENERIUM JSC) in a cohort of children with hemophilia A aged 6 to 12 years in the framework of phase III clinical study of moroktocoga alpha in children 2 to 12 years old with hemophilia A. Materials and methods of the research: the age cohort of 6 to 12 years olds of an open multicenter prospective noncomparative study included 27 male children with severe hemophilia A (mean age 8,3±1,9 years). The study was carried out sequentially in 2 stages. Stage I included the study of PK parameters in 22 patients after a single study drug dose of 50 IU/kg. At stage II, the efficacy and safety of the drug was assessed in patients of stage I, as well as in additionally included 5 patients who received the study drug dose of 30±10 IU/kg per day every 2–3 days for 22±1 weeks of treatment. To assess the efficacy, we analyzed the incidence of spontaneous bleeding that occurred within 48–72 h after drug administration; the number of injections and the dose of FVIII used for prophylaxis, as well as for treatment on demand of one episode of bleeding, taking into account its severity; number of patients with severe hemophilia A with residual FVIII activity >/=1% 48–72 h after drug administration; the investigator's overall assessment of response to therapy on the acute hemarthrosis response scale. The main indicators for the analysis of PK properties were the area under the «concentration-time» curve, the half-life, the elimination constant, the increase in activity, and the degree of recovery of activity. To assess safety, the frequency of formation of an inhibitor to FVIII, the dynamics of vital and laboratory parameters, the frequency and characteristics of adverse events (AEs) associated with the administration of the drug were taken into account. Results: the area under the FVIII-time activity curve in the region of 0–48 h (AUC0-48) and with exponential extrapolation to infinity (AUC0-inf) was 731,82±264,94%*h and 756,11±270,16%*h, respectively. The half-life (T1/2) was 10,32±2,27 hours. In the examined age group, 78 bleeding were recorded, of which only 27 (35%) were spontaneous, including 24 (30%) episodes that occurred during 48–72 hours after the administration of drug under investigation. Haemorrhage within 48–72 hours after administration of the Octofactor drug was absent or was observed rarely (1–3 times) against the background of prophylactic treatment in most patients (88%), the median number of bleeding within 48–72 hours after administration of the study drug was 2 episodes per observation period. The proportion of spontaneous bleeding was the smallest in patients receiving a single prophylactic doses of the study drug 2000–3000 IU (7% of all bleeding), the largest proportion of spontaneous bleeding was observed in patients receiving a single prophylactic doses of the study drug 1000–2000 IU (70% of bleeding). The average single dose of Octofactor for preventive treatment was 1290,4±458,6 IU or 39,12±7,79 IU/kg, for on-demand treatment – 1641,7±722,4 IU per single injection. Of the 78 reported bleeding episodes, 68 (87%) required the study drug administration for relief, while the remaining 10 bleedings were selfcontained. On average, to stop bleeding, it took 1,5±0,8 injections of the drug on demand, median doses were 1 [1; 2], and average doses were 2434,3±1501,7 IU. During the study, 37 AEs were recorded in 15 (56%) patients. At the same time, 36 AEs (97%) were not associated with the drug under investigation, and one AE (allergic reaction), according to the researchers, was associated with the use of the drug. Thus, the analysis of data indicates the efficacy and safety of the Octofactor drug both the prophylactic treatment and treatment of on-demand bleeding in 6 to 12 year old patients with severe hemophilia A.

T-Cell Alterations in Hemophiliacs Treated with Commercial Clotting Factor Concentrates

1983 ◽  
Vol 50 (02) ◽  
pp. 552-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Lechner ◽  
H Niessner ◽  
P Bettelheim ◽  
E Deutsch ◽  
I Fasching ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Absolute Number ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
T Helper ◽  
Immunological Parameters

SummaryVarious immunological parameters were determined in 46 patients with severe hemophilia A and in 9 patients with severe hemophilia B. All patients were treated over many years with commercial factor VIII or IX concentrates. Patients with severe classic hemophilia had a significantly reduced relative and absolute number of T-helper cells and a significantly increased relative and absolute number of T-suppressor cells. About half of these patients had an inverse T-helper/suppressor cell ratio. Patients with moderate hemophilia A and severe hemophilia B did not show these abnormalities. Hemophiliacs with an inverse ratio had a significantly higher concentration of serum total protein, IgG and IgM. No relationship between the amount of factor VIII concentrate administered, the HLA-type of the patient, the presence or absence of CMV-antibodies, hepatitis markers, thrombocytopenia and abnormal liver function tests to the T-cell abnormalities could be established. Lymphadenopathy was frequently associated with an inverse ratio. Indirect evidence suggests that the alterations of the immune system began in 1979/80.

scholarly journals Safety, Immunogenicity, and Hemostatic Efficacy of Nonacog Gamma in Patients With Severe or Moderately Severe Hemophilia B: A Continuation Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 107602962095083
Author(s):  
Jerzy Windyga ◽  
Oleksandra Stasyshyn ◽  
Toshko Lissitchkov ◽  
Vasily Mamonov ◽  
Margit Serban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Factor Ix ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Treatment Standard ◽  
Pediatric Study ◽  
Bleeding Episodes ◽  
Hemostatic Efficacy

This phase 3, prospective, open-label, multicenter, continuation study (NCT01286779) investigated the use of a recombinant factor IX (FIX), nonacog gamma (BAX 326, RIXUBIS®) in patients with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B. The study population included 85 patients transitioning from a phase 1/3 pivotal study (NCT01174446), a pediatric study (NCT01488994), and 30 newly recruited patients, naïve to nonacog gamma. Patients received nonacog gamma as prophylaxis treatment (standard, modified or PK-tailored) or on-demand, as determined by the investigator. Treatment was assessed for safety, immunogenicity, hemostatic efficacy and consumption. In this study, after ≥100 exposure days, nonacog gamma resulted in no treatment-related serious adverse events, and no patients developed inhibitory antibodies to FIX. Nonacog gamma was efficacious at controlling bleeding episodes, with an 89.1% overall hemostatic efficacy rating of excellent or good, and 56% of bleeds resolved with one infusion. The annualized bleeding rate was considerably lower during prophylactic treatment (median ABR of 1.3 in 108 patients) than during on-demand treatment (median ABR of 16.5 in 13 patients). These results show that in previously treated patients and nonacog gamma-naïve patients, long-term use of nonacog gamma had acceptable safety and tolerability, and was efficacious as a prophylactic treatment for the management of bleeding episodes. NCT01286779, EudraCT: 2010-022726-33

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document