scholarly journals Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction with Cladribine: Effects of Age and Leukemia Risk

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3988-3988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin W. Schoen ◽  
Susan K. Woelich ◽  
James T. Braun ◽  
Mark J. Fesler ◽  
Paul J. Petruska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
One Year ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) induction traditionally includes seven days of cytarabine and three days of an anthracycline (7+3). Co-administration of cladribine may increase efficacy of cytarabine. This rationale directed Saint Louis University (SLU) to adopt a regimen derived from the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (Holowiecki, JCO 2012) which adds five days of cladribine to idarubicin based 7+3 (IAC). We report the SLU experience with toxicity and survival following IAC induction. Additionally, we discuss the effects of IAC in patients 60 and older as an area of particular interest. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed AML (APL excluded) and high-risk MDS who received IAC from January 2009 to September 2015. IAC was initiated as cytarabine 200mg/m2 by continuous infusion for seven days, idarubicin 12mg/m2 daily for three days, and cladribine 5mg/m2 for five days. Mortality and disease response were analyzed, with stratification by age and NCCN leukemia risk classification. Results: Of 107 patients, 57 patients (53%) were age 60 and older. By NCCN cytogenetic and molecular stratification, 21 (20%) had favorable risk; 43 (40%) intermediate risk; and 43 (40%) poor risk leukemia. Complete response (CR) occurred in 75 (70%) patients and CRi in an additional 9 patients (8%) for an overall response rate of 79% (see Table 1). At one year, 58% of patients were still alive with 47% (27/57) of patients ≥60 years and 72% (36/50) of those <60 years surviving (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-6.4). When stratifying by NCCN risk, no deaths at one year occurred among the favorable risk group (0/21), but 16/43 (37%) and 28/43 (65%) occurred in intermediate and poor-risk strata, respectively (p<0.001 by chi-squared). Median overall survival was 17.2 months with mean follow-up of 32.8 months. Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) for death were significant for age ≥60 compared to age <60 (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.7). Additionally, HR for intermediate risk leukemia was 6.2 (95% CI 1.8-21) and for poor risk leukemia it was 11 (95% CI 3.4-36), when each were compared to favorable risk. Thirty-three (31%) of patients were known to have received an allogeneic transplant, of which 42% (14/33) were 60 and older. Adverse events: Overall, the treatment related mortality (TRM) (defined as death within the first 28 days) was 11%. Eleven of 12 TRM events occurred in patients ≥60 years (OR 12, 95% CI 1.5-94). Diarrhea occurred in 71% of patients with 46% enduring mucositis. Intensive care unit admission occurred in 23% overall, and infections were documented in 73% of patients. Most common infectious etiology was coagulase negative staph in 29% (23/78). For patients surviving to discharge (90/107), median hospitalization was 30 days post induction. Conclusions: Cladribine combined with cytarabine and idarubicin is an effective induction regimen for AML with high rates of CR, even in patients 60 and older. Our data show that NCCN leukemia risk is a better predictor of survival compared to age and that patients aged ≥60 years have better survival (lower HR for death) compared to those with intermediate or poor risk leukemia. Additionally, CR and 1 year overall survival with IAC are better than expected in the older cohort, however, TRM is elevated among those 60 and older. Higher intensity regimens in older patients may be justified in select patients, especially given the greater life expectancies enjoyed in the modern era. Several ongoing prospective trials investigating the safety and efficacy of cladribine in older patients will provide additional information to inform the use of IAC in older patients. Table 1 Table 1. Figure Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The FLAG Chemotherapy Regimen Is an Alternative to Anthracycline Based Therapy for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia for Patients with Multiple Co-Morbidities or Preexisting Cardiac Disease

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 961-961
Author(s):  
Lalit Saini ◽  
Robert Turner ◽  
Loree Larratt ◽  
Joseph Brandwein ◽  
Marlene Ann Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cardiac Disease ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract BACKGROUND: Anthracycline based treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality amongst older patients or those with significant co-morbidities. Furthermore, for patients with previous anthracycline exposure or preexisting cardiac disease anthracyclines pose an increased risk of cardiotoxicity. For such patients intensive treatment options are limited. The FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and filgrastim) regimen is a non-anthracycline based chemotherapy useful for relapsed/refractory AML and as initial therapy for “fit” eligible patients. We present our experience using FLAG as first line therapy in a cohort of newly diagnosed AML patients with advanced age, significant co-morbidities or preexisting cardiac disease. METHODS: A single institution retrospective chart review was undertaken of patients treated with FLAG as frontline therapy from 2004 – 2013 with follow-up until June 2014. All patients were considered ineligible for standard ‘3+7’ treatment by the attending physician. RESULTS: Over the study period 56 patients received FLAG. Due to patient refusal or induction complications bone marrow assessments to ascertain remission status were not performed in 10 patients – to minimize bias these patients were evaluated for toxicity and overall survival (OS) but excluded from complete remission (CR) and relapse free survival (RFS) analysis. Of the 56 patients, 68% were males. The median age was 69 (21 – 80) with 79% aged ≥ 60 and 43% aged ≥ 70. Fifty-five percent (31) of the patients had primary AML and cytogenetics were favorable in 5% (3), intermediate in 66% (37), poor-risk in 21% (12) and failed in 7% (4). Forty-six percent (26) were treated with FLAG due to preexisting cardiac disease and others due to advanced age (20%), poor performance status (16%), co-morbidities (16%) or previous anthracycline exposure (2%). The ages of patients treated with FLAG due to cardiac disease or other reasons was similar (63.5 years vs. 66.9 years, p=0.27). Amongst patients with cardiac disease a pre-chemotherapy cardiac evaluation revealed wall motion abnormalities in 39% and an ejection fraction (EF) ranging from 33% - 81% with a borderline (≤ 50-51%) EF in 46%. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 82% (46) of patients, 27% (15) required intensive care support and the induction mortality was 16% (9). Amongst patients evaluated for a CR (46/56), 48% (22/46) obtained a CR. Although a CR was seen in 100% (3/3), 46% (15/33) and 37% (3/8) of patients with favorable, intermediate and poor-risk cytogenetics respectively there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.22) between groups. A CR was obtained in two additional patients following a second course of FLAG for an overall CR rate of 52% (24/46). Of these 24 patients, 8 (33.3%) received no additional treatment while 16 (66.7%) received consolidative chemotherapy. Of 10 eligible patients, 4 proceeded to an allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) including two with preexisting cardiac disease. Of patients not transplanted 50% (10/20) eventually relapsed. There was no difference in relapse rates for those receiving FLAG for age/co-morbidities vs. cardiac disease (60% vs. 40%, p= 0.66) or for patients age <60 vs. ≥ 60 (50% vs. 50%, p=1.0). The median RFS was 441 days with no difference between patients treated with FLAG for cardiac reasons vs. other reasons (p=0.33) or for patient’s age < 60 vs. ≥ 60 (p=0.66). The median OS for the 56 patients was 278 days with 1 and 2 year survivals of 44% and 22% respectively. The median OS for patient’s age < 60 was higher than those age ≥ 60 (1102 days vs. 218 days, p=0.009) but there was no difference in the OS between patients treated with FLAG for cardiac disease and those treated for other reasons (305 days vs. 254 days, p=0.202). The median survival of patients with favorable, intermediate and unfavorable risk cytogenetics was 523 days, 311 days and 87 days respectively but this was not statistically significant (p=0.25) likely due to limited patient numbers. Conclusions: The FLAG regimen is a non-anthracycline based regimen that may serve as an alternative to the standard ‘3+7’ induction for AML in older adults or those with significant co-morbidities including preexisting cardiac disease. It is associated with comparable remission rates and overall survival in older patients. In addition, it may allow some patients with preexisting cardiac disease to proceed to allo-SCT. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Demographic, Physiopathogenic, Clinical and Therapeutic Comparative Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5096-5096
Author(s):  
Roberto Ovilla ◽  
Renee Leonor Crisp ◽  
Pamela E Baez-Islas ◽  
Jorge A Arbelbide ◽  
Sofia Grille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
White Blood Count ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acute Myeloid

INTRODUCTION Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (s-AML) evolves from a previous hematopoietic clonal disease such as Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS/AML), myeloproliferative neoplasia (NPM/AML), medullary insufficiencies - aplastic anemia - (AA/AML) or exposure to chemo or radiotherapy (t-AML). The objective of this work is to describe and highlight the demographic, pathophysiologic and clinical-therapeutic characteristics of s-AML patients compared with p-AML. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study based on the casuistry from 34 reference centers in Latin America during a period of 10 years (JAN10'-MAY19'). Patients ≥18 years old with primary AML, excluding the promyelocytic subtype (p-AML), and s-AML were admitted. Age, gender, performance status, comorbidity, cytogenetics, mutations, AML subtypes, extramedullary compromise, treatments and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Statistically, Graph Pad Prism version 5.00 and, SPSS version 17 were used. RESULTS One thousand eleven patients with newly diagnosed AML were recruited, 693 (68.5%) corresponded to p-AML and 318 (31.5%) to s-AML. The demographic differences between p-AML and s-AML are shown on Table 1. Subtypes of s-AML: t-AML (18.5%), MDS/AML (58.2%), NMP/AML (13.5%), AA/AML (5.7%) and others s-AML (4.1%). Global median age was 58 years (R 18-93) and male 52%. Extramedullary compromise in CNS (3.2%) and other organs (5.5%). Seven hundred ninety-three cytogenetic studies were evaluable (based on MRC classification): High (22.3%), Intermediate (68.3%) and Low Risk (9.3%). FLT3 mutation was more frequently found in p-AML. In s-AML, the multivariate study showed short overall survival associated with ECOG ≥2 (HR:2.0), white blood count ≥ 50x109/L at diagnosis (HR:1.9), poor risk karyotype (HR:1.6) and age over 60 years (HR:1.5). At least, 883 patients received treatment (Table 2). During this study period, 211 patients (21%) were transplanted; 49 (23%) were s-AML; histoidentical related donor (46%), haploidentical (39%), non-related (8%) and autologous (7%). The median survival for all AML was 11.0 months with a statistically significant difference in favor of the p-AML (Figure 1). CONCLUSION Performance status (by ECOG ≥2), age ≥60, level of leukocytes a ≥50x109/L, poor risk karyotype and s-AML subtype at diagnosis had a significant worse impact on overall survival. Most patients with s-AML came from MDS, they were older and their incidence increased as the population aged. They presented more comorbidities and worse performance status. Undoubtedly, our findings showed that s-AML is a distinct high risk subset of myeloid disorder with adverse prognosis and represents a therapeutic challenge. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Low expression of MN1 associates with better treatment response in older patients with de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (15) ◽  
pp. 4188-4198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Schwind ◽  
Guido Marcucci ◽  
Jessica Kohlschmidt ◽  
Michael D. Radmacher ◽  
Krzysztof Mrózek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Favorable Group ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractLow MN1 expression bestows favorable prognosis in younger adults with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML), but its prognostic significance in older patients is unknown. We analyzed pretherapy MN1 expression in 140 older (≥ 60 years) de novo CN-AML patients treated on cytarabine/daunorubicin-based protocols. Low MN1 expressers had higher complete remission (CR) rates (P = .001), and longer overall survival (P = .03) and event-free survival (EFS; P = .004). In multivariable models, low MN1 expression was associated with better CR rates and EFS. The impact of MN1 expression on overall survival and EFS was predominantly in patients 70 years of age or older, with low MN1 expressers with mutated NPM1 having the best outcome. The impact of MN1 expression was also observed in the Intermediate-I, but not the Favorable group of the European LeukemiaNet classification, where low MN1 expressers had CR rates and EFS similar to those of Favorable group patients. MN1 expresser-status-associated gene- and microRNA-expression signatures revealed underexpression of drug resistance and adverse outcome predictors, and overexpression of HOX genes and HOX-gene–embedded microRNAs in low MN1 expressers. We conclude that low MN1 expression confers better prognosis in older CN-AML patients and may refine the European LeukemiaNet classification. Biologic features associated with MN1 expression may help identify new treatment targets.

scholarly journals CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (26) ◽  
pp. 2684-2692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E. Lancet ◽  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Laura F. Newell ◽  
Tara L. Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Bone Marrow Cells ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin that delivers a synergistic 5:1 drug ratio into leukemia cells to a greater extent than normal bone marrow cells. Prior clinical studies demonstrated a sustained drug ratio and exposure in vivo and prolonged survival versus standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy (7+3 regimen) in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Patients and Methods In this open-label, randomized, phase III trial, 309 patients age 60 to 75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk/sAML received one to two induction cycles of CPX-351 or 7+3 followed by consolidation therapy with a similar regimen. The primary end point was overall survival. Results CPX-351 significantly improved median overall survival versus 7+3 (9.56 v 5.95 months; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; one-sided P = .003). Overall remission rate was also significantly higher with CPX-351 versus 7+3 (47.7% v 33.3%; two-sided P = .016). Improved outcomes were observed across age-groups and AML subtypes. The incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable between arms, despite a longer treatment phase and prolonged time to neutrophil and platelet count recovery with CPX-351. Early mortality rates with CPX-351 and 7+3 were 5.9% and 10.6% (two-sided P = .149) through day 30 and 13.7% and 21.2% (two-sided P = .097) through day 60. Conclusion CPX-351 treatment is associated with significantly longer survival compared with conventional 7+3 in older adults with newly diagnosed sAML. The safety profile of CPX-351 was similar to that of conventional 7+3 therapy.

Usefulness of Charlson Comorbidity Index to Predict Early Mortality and Overall Survival in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 804-812.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prajwal Dhakal ◽  
Valerie Shostrom ◽  
Zaid S. Al-Kadhimi ◽  
Lori J. Maness ◽  
Krishna Gundabolu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Charlson Comorbidity Index ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Clinical Useful Prognostic Index for Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Relapse.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2011-2011
Author(s):  
Dimitri A. Breems ◽  
Wim L.J. Van Putten ◽  
Bob Lowenberg
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Free Interval ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
One Year ◽  
First Complete Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse is associated with unsatisfactory rates of complete responses that are usually short lived. Previously proposed prognostic classification methods serving therapeutic decisions and evaluation of investigational treatment strategies at relapse of AML have been based on the duration of the relapse free interval and have largely neglected the influence of other known prognostic factors. Here we present an improved clinically useful prognostic index. This index has been developed from a multivariate analysis of 667 AML patients in first relapse among 1540 newly diagnosed non-M3 AML patients of age 15 to 60 years entered into three successive HOVON/SAKK Collaborative Group trials. The score, which has a range of 0 to 14 points, uses four relevant parameters. The parameters are: length of relapse free interval after first complete remission (more than 18 months: 0 points; 7 to 18 months: 3 points; 6 months or less: 5 points), cytogenetics at diagnosis (t(16;16) or inv(16): 0 points; t(8;21): 3 points; other cytogenetics: 5 points), age at relapse (35 years or younger: 0 points; 36 to 45 years: 1 point; older than 45 years: 2 points) and whether or not a previous stem cell transplantation (SCT) has been undertaken in first complete remission (no SCT: 0 points; previous SCT: 2 points). These points were assigned following estimations of the relative values of each of these factors contributing to outcome. Ultimately, three risk groups were defined: a favorable prognostic group A (0 to 6 points; overall survival of 70% at one year and 46% at five years), an intermediate risk group B (7 to 9 points; overall survival of 49% at one year and 18% at five years), and an unfavorable risk group C (10 to 14 points; overall survival of 16% at one year and 4% at five years). Thus, four commonly applied clinical parameters may identify among patients with AML in first relapse those for salvage or investigational therapy.

Validation of Monosomal Karyotype Based Model In the Risk Stratification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2745-2745
Author(s):  
Murtadha K. Al-Khabori ◽  
Karen Yee ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Aaron Schimmer ◽  
Andre Schuh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Structural Abnormality ◽  
Complex Karyotype ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Monosomal Karyotype ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 2745 Background: The influence of cytogenetic abnormalities on the prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been well-documented; however, the relative impact of certain miscellaneous abnormalities remains controversial. Recently, monosomal karyotype-based risk stratification has been shown to further discriminate the prognosis within the poor-risk karyotype group (Breems et al. JCO 2008), but this finding requires further validation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 779 consecutive adult AML patients treated with standard induction chemotherapy, consisting of daunorubicin plus cytarabine (3+7), at our institution from 1998–2008. After excluding patients with favourable risk, normal, missing or failed karyotype, 290 patients remained and were included in the analysis. Results: The baseline characteristics of these 290 patients were as follows: median age 59 y (range 18–81), male 181, prior malignancy 110, median white cell count (WBC) 7.6 × 10^9/L (range 0–246). The karyotypic features included single monosomy in 42, 2 or more monosomies in 51, and non-monosomy structural and numerical abnormalities in 197 patients. Of the 290, 116 (40 %) had three or more abnormalities (complex karyotype, CK). A total of 141 patients (49 %) achieved complete remission (CR) with 3+7 induction chemotherapy. Sixty-four patients received allogeneic stem cell transplantation in CR. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 12 months (95% CI: 10–14 months). The median OS was 10 (95% CI: 6–18), 7 (95% CI: 6–10) and 14 months (95% CI: 12–16) in the single monosomy, 2+ monosomy and non-monosomy groups, respectively (p < 0.0001 by log-rank test comparing the three groups). Among the patients containing at least one monosomy, the OS was not significantly different between the CK and non-CK groups (p = 0.08 by log rank). Similarly, in the non-monosomy structural abnormality group, the OS was not significantly different between the CK and non-CK groups (p = 0.2). Conclusions: Our results provide validation for the monosomal karyotype-based risk stratification for AML, indicating that patients with at least one monosomy have an inferior OS compared to other poor-risk non-monosomy groups. Within each of the monosomy and non-monosomy groups, the presence of a complex karyotype does not significantly influence the OS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A Prognostic Score of Overall Survival In Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2730-2730
Author(s):  
Murtadha K. Al-Khabori ◽  
Gordon Guyatt ◽  
Mark D. Minden ◽  
Karen Yee ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Good Discrimination ◽  
Prior Malignancy ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Deviance Residuals

Abstract Abstract 2730 Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant myeloid disorder with heterogeneous outcomes. A number of factors have been shown to be prognostic; age, white blood cell (WBC), prior malignancy, performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ECOG) and cytogenetics. Methods: We planned to develop and validate a prognostic score for the 5-year (y) overall survival (OS) of adults with AML receiving intensive induction chemotherapy. We used Cox model to estimate the regression coefficients and Kaplan-Meier to estimate the 5-y OS. We used Cox-Snell, Schoenfeld and deviance residuals for model diagnostics and bootstrap validation to estimate the performance measures; Harrell's concordance and deviance residuals. Results: We retrospectively analyzed 779 patients treated between 1998–2008, using a prospectively collected database. The median age was 58 y. Most patients had intermediate risk cytogenetics (61%) and good performance status (ECOG 0–1: 79%). The median follow up for the surviving patients was 26.7 months (95% CI 18.8–32.9 months). The 5-y OS was 26% (22- 30%). All variables were statistically significant in the multivariable Cox regression model; age (y) (Hazard Ratio, HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.018–1.034), WBC (1*10^9/L) (HR 1.004; 1.002–1.006), prior malignancy (HR 1.58; 1.26–2.00), ECOG (ECOG 2 HR 1.41; 1.06–1.88, ECOG 3–4 HR 9.99; 4.72–21.18) and cytogenetics (intermediate risk HR 2.49; 1.41–4.39, poor risk HR 4.74; 2.65–8.50). The score divided patients into four risk groups; good (n=47), intermediate (n=129), poor (n=198) and extremely poor (n=87). The estimated 5-y OS was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.53–0.81), 0.37 (0.28–0.46), 0.15 (0.10–0.21) and 0.03 (0.01–0.10) respectively. The model showed good discrimination with large differences between survival curves and good Harrell concordance of 0.69. It showed good calibration using Cox-Snell and deviance residuals. In the intermediate risk cytogenetic group, the model showed good discrimination with over 45% difference in 5-y OS between the good and extremely poor groups. Conclusions: Our study confirmed the prognostic impact of the 5 variables reported in the literature. Using these factors, we developed a score to predict long term OS that showed good discrimination and calibration. The score added further discrimination in the intermediate risk cytogenetic group. Prospective external validation of the score is needed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Patients with FLT3 Negative Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Normal Cytogenetic who Have the Combination Mutations (NPM1-/CEBPA-) Have Better Survival Than Patients Who Have the Combination Mutations (NPM1+/CEBPA+)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4874-4874
Author(s):  
Shamail Butt ◽  
Pascal Akl ◽  
Himanshu Bhardwaj ◽  
Samer A Srour ◽  
Terry Dunn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Mutation Analysis ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Cebpa Mutations ◽  
Normal Cytogenetics ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 4874 Introduction: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is the most common type of acute leukemia in adults. About 50% of patients with AML have normal karyotype, and are categorized as intermediate risk group. However, the clinical behavior and response to treatment in this group is heterogeneous. As a result, there is strong interest in characterizing molecular genetic features in the intermediate-risk AML patients that might rectify their stratification risk. In this group, FLT3-ITD (Internal Tandem Duplication) and FLT3-TKD (Tyrosine Kinase Domain) mutations are known to confer unfavorable risk whereas NPM1 and CEBPA mutations are known to be favorable risk markers. The purpose of this study is to analyze the combination of NPM1 and CEBPA mutations in presence or absence of FLT3 mutations on prognosis of AML patients referred to the State's largest tertiary care center over a period of 10 years for the treatment of leukemia. Patients and Method: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with AML evaluated at University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center between January 2000 and December 2010. Patient's age, gender, race, laboratory and clinical data as well as bone marrow biopsy and aspirate findings were reported. PCR and Fragment Analysis were conducted on all available DNA preserved bone marrow materials to test the FLT3, NPM1 and CEBPA mutations. For statistical analysis, Kaplan-Meyer curve was used. Results: A total of 239 patients were evaluated. Male to female ratio was 2/1. Median age at diagnosis was 46y. 21 out of the 239 patients were less than 18 year old. DNA samples were present on 132 patients and mutation analysis for FLT3, CEBPA and NPM1 was performed. Correlation between mutations and AML prognosis was determined. 67/132 (50.8 %) patients were categorized into intermediate risk group (majority of patients had normal cytogenetics). 14/67 (20.9%) pts were FLT3+ (FLT3-ITD or FLT3-TKD mutation). 17/67 (23.9%) were NPM1+. 7/67 (10.4%) were CEBPA +. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to identify cumulative proportion surviving over time. FLT3 presence or absence itself was not identified to be statistically significant (p 0.416) in terms of overall survival. Interestingly, presence or absence of combined NPM1/CEBPA mutation in FLT3 negative patients, among intermediate risk group, was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) in determining overall survival. In this subgroup, presence of NPM1/CEBPA combination (NPM1+/CEBPA+) was associated with poor prognosis (figure 2, lower curve), while absence of NPM1/CEBPA combination (NPM1-/CEBPA-) carries a better prognosis (figure 2, upper curve). Conclusion: Results of our study highlight the importance of performing combinations of mutation analysis in evaluation of overall prognosis in AML patients. FLT3-/NPM1+ profile in patients with normal cytogenetics is thought to confer a favorable prognosis. We demonstrated in this study that using combination mutation analysis in patients with FLT3- can change the risk stratification in patients with intermediate risk group and might affect therapeutic interventions in this patient population. Larger prospective studies are needed in the future for further validation of our findings. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document