scholarly journals Standardisation and application of the single-breath determination of nitric oxide uptake in the lung

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 1600962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald S. Zavorsky ◽  
Connie C.W. Hsia ◽  
J. Michael B. Hughes ◽  
Colin D.R. Borland ◽  
Hervé Guénard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Hold Time ◽  
Haemoglobin Concentration ◽  
Specific Conductance ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Detection Range ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Alveolar Oxygen

Diffusing capacity of the lung for nitric oxide (DLNO), otherwise known as the transfer factor, was first measured in 1983. This document standardises the technique and application of single-breathDLNO. This panel agrees that 1) pulmonary function systems should allow for mixing and measurement of both nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO) gases directly from an inspiratory reservoir just before use, with expired concentrations measured from an alveolar “collection” or continuously sampledviarapid gas analysers; 2) breath-hold time should be 10 s with chemiluminescence NO analysers, or 4–6 s to accommodate the smaller detection range of the NO electrochemical cell; 3) inspired NO and oxygen concentrations should be 40–60 ppm and close to 21%, respectively; 4) the alveolar oxygen tension (PAO2) should be measured by sampling the expired gas; 5) a finite specific conductance in the blood for NO (θNO) should be assumed as 4.5 mL·min-1·mmHg-1·mL-1of blood; 6) the equation for 1/θCO should be (0.0062·PAO2+1.16)·(ideal haemoglobin/measured haemoglobin) based on breath-holdingPAO2and adjusted to an average haemoglobin concentration (male 14.6 g·dL−1, female 13.4 g·dL−1); 7) a membrane diffusing capacity ratio (DMNO/DMCO) should be 1.97, based on tissue diffusivity.

scholarly journals Reference equations for pulmonary diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide and nitric oxide in adult Caucasians

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 1500677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Munkholm ◽  
Jacob Louis Marott ◽  
Lars Bjerre-Kristensen ◽  
Flemming Madsen ◽  
Ole Find Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Carbon Monoxide ◽  
Hold Time ◽  
Specific Conductance ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Capillary Membrane ◽  
Reference Equations ◽  
Hb Concentration

The aim of this study was to determine reference equations for the combined measurement of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxide (NO) (DLCONO). In addition, we wanted to appeal for consensus regarding methodology of the measurement including calculation of diffusing capacity of the alveolo-capillary membrane (Dm) and pulmonary capillary volume (Vc).DLCONO was measured in 282 healthy individuals aged 18–97 years using the single-breath technique and a breath-hold time of 5 s (true apnoea period). The following values were used: 1) specific conductance of nitric oxide (θNO)=4.5 mLNO·mLblood−1·min−1·mmHg−1; 2) ratio of diffusing capacity of the membrane for NO and CO (DmNO/DmCO)=1.97; and 3) 1/red cell CO conductance (1/θCO)=(1.30+0.0041·mean capillary oxygen pressure)·(14.6/Hb concentration in g·dL−1).Reference equations were established for the outcomes of DLCONO, including DLCO and DLNO and the calculated values Dm and Vc. Independent variables were age, sex, height and age squared.By providing new reference equations and by appealing for consensus regarding the methodology, we hope to provide a basis for future studies and clinical use of this novel and interesting method.

Pulmonary diffusing capacities for oxygen-labeled CO2 and nitric oxide in rabbits

1998 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 606-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut Heller ◽  
Gabi Fuchs ◽  
Klaus-Dieter Schuster
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Membrane Component ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Partial Pressures

Heller, Hartmut, Gabi Fuchs, and Klaus-Dieter Schuster. Pulmonary diffusing capacities for oxygen-labeled CO2 and nitric oxide in rabbits. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(2): 606–611, 1998.—We determined the pulmonary diffusing capacity (Dl) for18O-labeled CO2(C18O2) and nitric oxide (NO) to estimate the membrane component of the respective gas conductances. Six anesthetized paralyzed rabbits were ventilated by a computerized ventilatory servo system. Single-breath maneuvers were automatically performed by inflating the lungs with gas mixtures containing 0.9% C18O2or 0.05% NO in nitrogen, with breath-holding periods ranging from 0 to 1 s for C18O2and from 2 to 8 s for NO. The alveolar partial pressures of C18O2and NO were determined by using respiratory mass spectrometry. Dl was calculated from gas exchange during inflation, breath hold, and deflation. We obtained values of 14.0 ± 1.1 and 2.2 ± 0.1 (mean value ± SD) ml ⋅ mmHg−1 ⋅ min−1for[Formula: see text]and Dl NO, respectively. The measured[Formula: see text]/Dl NOratio was one-half that of the theoretically predicted value according to Graham’s law (6.3 ± 0.5 vs. 12, respectively). Analyses of the several mechanisms influencing the determination of[Formula: see text]and Dl NOand their ratio are discussed. An underestimation of the membrane diffusing component for CO2 is considered the likely reason for the low[Formula: see text]/Dl NOratio obtained.

Measurement of temporal changes in DLSBCO-3EQ from small alveolar samples in normal subjects

1994 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 1494-1501 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Soparkar ◽  
J. T. Mink ◽  
B. L. Graham ◽  
D. J. Cotton
Keyword(s):  
Hold Time ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Gas Diffusion ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Mixing Efficiency ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Inspiratory Capacity ◽  
Ventilation Inhomogeneity ◽  
Single Breath

The dynamic changes in CO concentration [CO] during a single breath could be influenced by topographic inhomogeneity in the lung or by peripheral inhomogeneity due to a gas mixing resistance in the gas phase of the lung or to serial gradients in gas diffusion. Ten healthy subjects performed single-breath maneuvers by slowly inhaling test gas from functional residual capacity to one-half inspiratory capacity and slowly exhaling to residual volume with target breath-hold times of 0, 1.5, 3, 6, and 9 s. We calculated the three-equation single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for CO (DLSBCO-3EQ) from the mean [CO] in both the entire alveolar gas sample and in four successive equal alveolar gas samples. DLSBCO-3EQ from the entire alveolar gas sample was independent of breath-hold time. However, with 0 s of breath holding, from early alveolar gas samples DLSBCO-3EQ was reduced and from late alveolar gas samples it was increased. With increasing breath-hold time, DLSBCO-3EQ from the earliest alveolar gas sample rapidly increased, whereas from the last alveolar gas sample it rapidly decreased such that all values from the small alveolar gas samples approached DLSBCO-3EQ from the entire alveolar sample. These changes correlated with ventilation inhomogeneity, as measured by the phase III He concentration slope and the mixing efficiency, and were larger for maneuvers with inspired volumes to one-half inspiratory capacity vs. total lung capacity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Single-breath breath-holding estimate of pulmonary blood flow in man: comparison with direct Fick cardiac output

1989 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 673-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. H. Kendrick ◽  
A. Rozkovec ◽  
M. Papouchado ◽  
J. West ◽  
G. Laszlo
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Pulmonary Blood Flow ◽  
Hold Time ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cardiac Disorders

1. Resting pulmonary blood flow (Q.), using the uptake of the soluble inert gas Freon-22 and an indirect estimate of lung tissue volume, has been estimated during breath-holding (Q.c) and compared with direct Fick cardiac output (Q.f) in 16 patients with various cardiac disorders. 2. The effect of breath-hold time was investigated by comparing Q.c estimated using 6 and 10 s of breath-holding in 17 patients. Repeatability was assessed by duplicate measurements of Q.c in the patients and in six normal subjects. 3. Q.c tended to overestimate Q.f, the bias and error being 0.09 l/min and 0.59, respectively. The coefficient of repeatability for Q.c in the patients was 0.75 l/min and in the normal subjects was 0.66 1/min. For Q.f it was 0.72 l/min. There was no significant difference in Q.c measured at the two breath-hold times. 4. The technique is simple to perform, and provides a rapid estimate of Q., monitoring acute and chronic changes in cardiac output in normal subjects and patients with cardiac disease.

Effect of ventilation inhomogeneity on "intrabreath" measurements of diffusing capacity in normal subjects

1993 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 927-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Cotton ◽  
M. B. Prabhu ◽  
J. T. Mink ◽  
B. L. Graham
Keyword(s):  
Lung Volume ◽  
Hold Time ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Ventilation Inhomogeneity ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
The Mean ◽  
And Diffusion

In normal seated subjects we increased single-breath ventilation inhomogeneity by changing both the preinspiratory lung volume and breath-hold time and examined the ensuing effects on two different techniques of measuring the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). We measured the mean single-breath DLCO using the three-equation method (DLCOSB-3EQ) and also measured DLCO over discrete intervals during exhalation by the "intrabreath" method (DLCOexhaled). We assessed the distribution of ventilation using the normalized phase III slope for helium (SN). DLCOSB-3EQ was unaffected by preinspiratory lung volume and breath-hold time. DLCOexhaled increased with increasing preinspiratory lung volume and decreased with increasing breath-hold time. These changes correlated with the simultaneously observed changes in ventilation inhomogeneity as measured by SN (P < 0.01). We conclude that measurements of DLCOexhaled do not accurately reflect the mean DLCO. Intrabreath methods of measuring DLCO are based on the slope of the exhaled CO concentration curve, which is affected by both ventilation and diffusion inhomogeneities. Although DLCOexhaled may theoretically provide information about the distribution of CO uptake, the concomitant effects of ventilation nonuniformity on DLCOexhaled may mimic or mask the effects of diffusion nonuniformity.

scholarly journals Implementing the Three-Equation Method of Measuring Single Breath Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian L Graham ◽  
Joseph T Mink ◽  
David J Cotton
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Monoxide ◽  
Lung Volume ◽  
Equation Method ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Conventional Methods ◽  
Made In

Conventional methods of measuring the single breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLcoSB) are based on the Krogh equation, which is valid only during breath holding. Rigid standardization is used to approximate a pure breath hold manoeuvre, but variations in performing the manoeuvre cause errors in the measurement of DLcoSB. The authors previously described a method of measuring DLcoSBusing separate equations describing carbon monoxide uptake during each phase of the manoeuvre: inhalation, breath holding and exhalation. The method is manoeuvre-independent, uses all of the exhaled alveolar gas to improve estimates of mean DLcoSBand lung volume, and is more accurate and precise than conventional methods. A slow, submaximal, more physiological single breath manoeuvre can be used to measure DLcoSBin patients who cannot achieve the flow rates and breath hold times necessary for the standardized manoeuvre. The method was initially implemented using prototype equipment but commercial systems are now available that are capable of implementing this method. The authors describe how to implement the method and discuss considerations to be made in its use.

scholarly journals Rate of nitric oxide production by lower alveolar airways of human lungs

1999 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar J. Geigel ◽  
Richard W. Hyde ◽  
Irene B. Perillo ◽  
Alfonso Torres ◽  
Peter T. Perkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Nitric Oxide Production ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Constant Flow Rate ◽  
Oxide Production ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Human Lungs ◽  
Lower Airways

This report describes methods for measuring nitric oxide production by the lungs’ lower alveolar airways (V˙no), defined as those alveoli and bronchioles well perfused by the pulmonary circulation. Breath holding or vigorous rebreathing for 15–20 s minimizes removal of NO from the lower airways and results in a constant partial pressure of NO in the lower airways (Pl). Then the amount of NO diffusing into the perfusing blood will be the pulmonary diffusing capacity for NO (Dno) multiplied by Pl and by mass balance equalsV˙no, or V˙no = Dno(Pl). To measure Pl, 10 normal subjects breath held for 20 s followed by exhalation at a constant flow rate of 0.83 ± 0.14 (SD) l/s or rebreathed at 59 ± 15 l/min for 20 s while NO was continuously measured at the mouth. Dno was estimated to equal five times the single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. By using breath holding, Pl equaled 2.9 ± 0.8 mmHg × 10−6and V˙noequaled 0.39 ± 0.12 μl/min. During rebreathing Pl equaled 2.3 ± 0.6 mmHg × 10−6 andV˙no equaled 0.29 ± 0.11 μl/min. Measurements of NO at the mouth during rapid, constant exhalation after breath holding for 20 s or during rebreathing provide reproducible methods for measuringV˙no in humans.

Effect of breath-hold time on DLCO(SB) in patients with airway obstruction

1985 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1319-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. L. Graham ◽  
J. T. Mink ◽  
D. J. Cotton
Keyword(s):  
Hold Time ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Incomplete Mixing ◽  
Capillary Membrane ◽  
Phase Iii Slope ◽  
Alveolar Capillary ◽  
Short Breath

The single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for CO [DLCO(SB)] is considered a measure of the conductance of CO across the alveolar-capillary membrane and its binding with hemoglobin. Although incomplete mixing of inspired gas with alveolar gas could theoretically influence overall diffusion, conventional calculations of DLCO(SB) spuriously overestimate DLCO(SB) during short breath-holding periods when incomplete mixing of gas within the lung might have the greatest effect. Using the three-equation method to calculate DLCO(SB) which analytically accounts for changes in breath-hold time, we found that DLCO(SB) did not change with breath-hold time in control subjects but increased with increasing breath-hold time in both patients with asthma and patients with emphysema. The increase in DLCO(SB) with increasing breath-hold time correlated with the phase III slope of the single-breath N2 washout curve. We suggest that in patients with ventilation maldistribution, DLCO(SB) may be decreased for the shorter breath-hold maneuvers because overall diffusion is limited by the reduced transport of CO from the inspired gas through the alveolar gas prior to alveolar-capillary gas exchange.

scholarly journals Chemiluminescent measurements of nitric oxide pulmonary diffusing capacity and alveolar production in humans

2001 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 1931-1940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene B. Perillo ◽  
Richard W. Hyde ◽  
Albert J. Olszowka ◽  
Anthony P. Pietropaoli ◽  
Lauren M. Frasier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
No Production ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Volume Changes ◽  
Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation ◽  
Oxygen Tensions ◽  
Single Constant

Measurements of nitric oxide (NO) pulmonary diffusing capacity (Dl NO) multiplied by alveolar NO partial pressure (Pa NO) provide values for alveolar NO production (V˙a NO). We evaluated applying a rapidly responding chemiluminescent NO analyzer to measure Dl NO during a single, constant exhalation (DexNO) or by rebreathing (DrbNO). With the use of an initial inspiration of 5–10 parts/million of NO with a correction for the measured NO back pressure, DexNO in nine healthy subjects equaled 125 ± 29 (SD) ml · min−1 · mmHg−1 and DrbNO equaled 122 ± 26 ml · min−1 · mmHg−1. These values were 4.7 ± 0.6 and 4.6 ± 0.6 times greater, respectively, than the subject's single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DsbCO). Coefficients of variation were similar to previously reported breath-holding, single-breath measurements of DsbCO. Pa NOmeasured in seven of the subjects equaled 1.8 ± 0.7 mmHg × 10−6 and resulted in V˙a NO of 0.21 ± 0.06 μl/min using DexNO and 0.20 ± 0.6 μl/min with DrbNO. DexNO remained constant at end-expiratory oxygen tensions varied from 42 to 682 Torr. Decreases in lung volume resulted in falls of DexNO and DrbNO similar to the reported effect of volume changes on DsbCO. These data show that rapidly responding chemiluminescent NO analyzers provide reproducible measurements of Dl NO using single exhalations or rebreathing suitable for measuring V˙a NO.

Effect of lung volume on breath holding

1987 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1962-1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Whitelaw ◽  
B. McBride ◽  
G. T. Ford
Keyword(s):  
Lung Volume ◽  
Hold Time ◽  
Esophageal Pressure ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Pressure Waves ◽  
Expiratory Muscle ◽  
Inspiratory Muscles ◽  
Consistent Change ◽  
Rhythmic Contractions

The mechanism by which large lung volume lessens the discomfort of breath holding and prolongs breath-hold time was studied by analyzing the pressure waves made by diaphragm contractions during breath holds at various lung volumes. Subjects rebreathed a mixture of 8% CO2–92% O2 and commenced breath holding after reaching an alveolar plateau. At all volumes, regular rhythmic contractions of inspiratory muscles, followed by means of gastric and pleural pressures, increased in amplitude and frequency until the breakpoint. Expiratory muscle activity was more prominent in some subjects than others, and increased through each breath hold. Increasing lung volume caused a delay in onset and a decrease in frequency of contractions with no consistent change in duty cycle and a decline in magnitude of esophageal pressure swings that could be accounted for by force-length and geometric properties. The effect of lung volume on the timing of contractions most resembled that of a chest wall reflex and is consistent with the hypothesis that the contractions are a major source of dyspnea in breath holding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document