scholarly journals Concordant integrative gene set enrichment analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample expression data sets

BMC Genomics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinglei Lai ◽  
Fanni Zhang ◽  
Tapan K Nayak ◽  
Reza Modarres ◽  
Norman H Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment ◽  
Gene Set

scholarly journals Towards a gold standard for benchmarking gene set enrichment analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludwig Geistlinger ◽  
Gergely Csaba ◽  
Mara Santarelli ◽  
Marcel Ramos ◽  
Lucas Schiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment ◽  
Gene Set ◽  
Gene Sets ◽  
Enrichment Methods

AbstractBackgroundAlthough gene set enrichment analysis has become an integral part of high-throughput gene expression data analysis, the assessment of enrichment methods remains rudimentary and ad hoc. In the absence of suitable gold standards, evaluations are commonly restricted to selected data sets and biological reasoning on the relevance of resulting enriched gene sets. However, this is typically incomplete and biased towards the goals of individual investigations.ResultsWe present a general framework for standardized and structured benchmarking of enrichment methods based on defined criteria for applicability, gene set prioritization, and detection of relevant processes. This framework incorporates a curated compendium of 75 expression data sets investigating 42 different human diseases. The compendium features microarray and RNA-seq measurements, and each dataset is associated with a precompiled GO/KEGG relevance ranking for the corresponding disease under investigation. We perform a comprehensive assessment of 10 major enrichment methods on the benchmark compendium, identifying significant differences in (i) runtime and applicability to RNA-seq data, (ii) fraction of enriched gene sets depending on the type of null hypothesis tested, and (iii) recovery of the a priori defined relevance rankings. Based on these findings, we make practical recommendations on (i) how methods originally developed for microarray data can efficiently be applied to RNA-seq data, (ii) how to interpret results depending on the type of gene set test conducted, and (iii) which methods are best suited to effectively prioritize gene sets with high relevance for the phenotype investigated.ConclusionWe carried out a systematic assessment of existing enrichment methods, and identified best performing methods, but also general shortcomings in how gene set analysis is currently conducted. We provide a directly executable benchmark system for straightforward assessment of additional enrichment methods.Availabilityhttp://bioconductor.org/packages/GSEABenchmarkeR

scholarly journals Revealing Biological Pathways Implicated in Lung Cancer from TCGA Gene Expression Data Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 13s1 ◽  
pp. CIN.S13882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binghuang Cai ◽  
Xia Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment ◽  
Gene Set ◽  
Pathway Gene

Analyzing biological system abnormalities in cancer patients based on measures of biological entities, such as gene expression levels, is an important and challenging problem. This paper applies existing methods, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and Signaling Pathway Impact Analysis, to pathway abnormality analysis in lung cancer using microarray gene expression data. Gene expression data from studies of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LUSC) in The Cancer Genome Atlas project, and pathway gene set data from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes were used to analyze the relationship between pathways and phenotypes. Results, in the form of pathway rankings, indicate that some pathways may behave abnormally in LUSC. For example, both the cell cycle and viral carcinogenesis pathways ranked very high in LUSC. Furthermore, some pathways that are known to be associated with cancer, such as the p53 and the PI3K-Akt signal transduction pathways, were found to rank high in LUSC. Other pathways, such as bladder cancer and thyroid cancer pathways, were also ranked high in LUSC.

scholarly journals Evaluating Gene Set Enrichment Analysis via a Hybrid Data Model

2014 ◽  
Vol 13s1 ◽  
pp. CIN.S13305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianping Hua ◽  
Michael L. Bittner ◽  
Edward R. Dougherty
Keyword(s):  
Simulation Study ◽  
Data Model ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Gene Set ◽  
Ranking Performance ◽  
Hybrid Data

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSA) methods have been widely adopted by biological labs to analyze data and generate hypotheses for validation. Most of the existing comparison studies focus on whether the existing GSA methods can produce accurate P-values; however, practitioners are often more concerned with the correct gene-set ranking generated by the methods. The ranking performance is closely related to two critical goals associated with GSA methods: the ability to reveal biological themes and ensuring reproducibility, especially for small-sample studies. We have conducted a comprehensive simulation study focusing on the ranking performance of seven representative GSA methods. We overcome the limitation on the availability of real data sets by creating hybrid data models from existing large data sets. To build the data model, we pick a master gene from the data set to form the ground truth and artificially generate the phenotype labels. Multiple hybrid data models can be constructed from one data set and multiple data sets of smaller sizes can be generated by resampling the original data set. This approach enables us to generate a large batch of data sets to check the ranking performance of GSA methods. Our simulation study reveals that for the proposed data model, the Q2 type GSA methods have in general better performance than other GSA methods and the global test has the most robust results. The properties of a data set play a critical role in the performance. For the data sets with highly connected genes, all GSA methods suffer significantly in performance.

scholarly journals XGSEA: CROSS-species Gene Set Enrichment Analysis via domain adaptation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Menglan Cai ◽  
Canh Hao Nguyen ◽  
Hiroshi Mamitsuka ◽  
Limin Li
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Domain Adaptation ◽  
Gene Knockout ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment ◽  
Gene Set ◽  
Gene Sets

AbstractGene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) has been widely used to identify gene sets with statistically significant difference between cases and controls against a large gene set. GSEA needs both phenotype labels and expression of genes. However, gene expression are assessed more often for model organisms than minor species. More importantly, gene expression could not be measured under specific conditions for human, due to high healthy risk of direct experiments, such as non-approved treatment or gene knockout, and then often substituted by mouse. Thus predicting enrichment significance (on a phenotype) of a given gene set of a species (target, say human), by using gene expression measured under the same phenotype of the other species (source, say mouse) is a vital and challenging problem, which we call CROSS-species Gene Set Enrichment Problem (XGSEP). For XGSEP, we propose XGSEA (Cross-species Gene Set Enrichment Analysis), with three steps of: 1) running GSEA for a source species to obtain enrichment scores and p-values of source gene sets; 2) representing the relation between source and target gene sets by domain adaptation; and 3) using regression to predict p-values of target gene sets, based on the representation in 2). We extensively validated XGSEA by using four real data sets under various settings, proving that XGSEA significantly outperformed three baseline methods. A case study of identifying important human pathways for T cell dysfunction and reprogramming from mouse ATAC-Seq data further confirmed the reliability of XGSEA. Source code is available through https://github.com/LiminLi-xjtu/XGSEAAuthor summaryGene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) is a powerful tool in the gene sets differential analysis given a ranked gene list. GSEA requires complete data, gene expression with phenotype labels. However, gene expression could not be measured under specific conditions for human, due to high risk of direct experiments, such as non-approved treatment or gene knockout, and then often substituted by mouse. Thus no availability of gene expression leads to more challenging problem, CROSS-species Gene Set Enrichment Problem (XGSEP), in which enrichment significance (on a phenotype) of a given gene set of a species (target, say human) is predicted by using gene expression measured under the same phenotype of the other species (source, say mouse). In this work, we propose XGSEA (Cross-species Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) for XGSEP, with three steps of: 1) GSEA; 2) domain adaptation; and 3) regression. The results of four real data sets and a case study indicate that XGSEA significantly outperformed three baseline methods and confirmed the reliability of XGSEA.

scholarly journals Fast gene set enrichment analysis

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennady Korotkevich ◽  
Vladimir Sukhov ◽  
Alexey Sergushichev
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Polynomial Algorithm ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment ◽  
P Values ◽  
Gene Set

AbstractPreranked gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) is a widely used method for interpretation of gene expression data in terms of biological processes. Here we present FGSEA method that is able to estimate arbitrarily low GSEA P-values with a higher accuracy and much faster compared to other implementations. We also present a polynomial algorithm to calculate GSEA P-values exactly, which we use to practically confirm the accuracy of the method.

scholarly journals Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of Interaction Networks Weighted by Node Centrality

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Zito ◽  
Marta Lualdi ◽  
Paola Granata ◽  
Dario Cocciadiferro ◽  
Antonio Novelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Betweenness Centrality ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Comparative Genomic ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment ◽  
Gene Set ◽  
Ppi Networks

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) is a powerful tool to associate a disease phenotype to a group of genes/proteins. GSEA attributes a specific weight to each gene/protein in the input list that depends on a metric of choice, which is usually represented by quantitative expression data. However, expression data are not always available. Here, GSEA based on betweenness centrality of a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network is described and applied to two cases, where an expression metric is missing. First, personalized PPI networks were generated from genes displaying alterations (assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization and whole exome sequencing) in four probands bearing a 16p13.11 microdeletion in common and several other point variants. Patients showed disease phenotypes linked to neurodevelopment. All networks were assembled around a cluster of first interactors of altered genes with high betweenness centrality. All four clusters included genes known to be involved in neurodevelopmental disorders with different centrality. Moreover, the GSEA results pointed out to the evidence of “cell cycle” among enriched pathways. Second, a large interaction network obtained by merging proteomics studies on three neurodegenerative disorders was analyzed from the topological point of view. We observed that most central proteins are often linked to Parkinson’s disease. The selection of these proteins improved the specificity of GSEA, with “Metabolism of amino acids and derivatives” and “Cellular response to stress or external stimuli” as top-ranked enriched pathways. In conclusion, betweenness centrality revealed to be a suitable metric for GSEA. Thus, centrality-based GSEA represents an opportunity for precision medicine and network medicine.

scholarly journals Higher Acid-Base Imbalance Associated with Respiratory Failure Could Decrease the Survival of Patients with Scrub Typhus during Intensive Care Unit Stay: A Gene Set Enrichment Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung Min Moon ◽  
Kyueng-Whan Min ◽  
Mi-Hye Kim ◽  
Dong-Hoon Kim ◽  
Byoung Kwan Son ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Scrub Typhus ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Acid Base ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment ◽  
Gene Set ◽  
Gene Sets

Ninety percent of patients with scrub typhus (SC) with vasculitis-like syndrome recover after mild symptoms; however, 10% can suffer serious complications, such as acute respiratory failure (ARF) and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Predictors for the progression of SC have not yet been established, and conventional scoring systems for ICU patients are insufficient to predict severity. We aimed to identify simple and robust indicators to predict aggressive behaviors of SC. We evaluated 91 patients with SC and 81 non-SC patients who were admitted to the ICU, and 32 cases from the public functional genomics data repository for gene expression analysis. We analyzed the relationships between several predictors and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with SC. We performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to identify SC-specific gene sets. The acid-base imbalance (ABI), measured 24 h before serious complications, was higher in patients with SC than in non-SC patients. A high ABI was associated with an increased incidence of ARF, leading to mechanical ventilation and worse survival. GSEA revealed that SC correlated to gene sets reflecting inflammation/apoptotic response and airway inflammation. ABI can be used to indicate ARF in patients with SC and assist with early detection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document