scholarly journals Mental health of postgraduate trainees in primary care: a cross-sectional study

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Till J. Bugaj ◽  
Katja Krug ◽  
Annalena Rentschler ◽  
Christoph Nikendei ◽  
Joachim Szecsenyi ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 5554
Author(s):  
Neeraja Meesala ◽  
GV D Harsha ◽  
Pradeep Kandikatla ◽  
PVenkata Karteekvarma ◽  
SandhyaR Nadakuditi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alberto dos Santos Treichel ◽  
Ioannis Bakolis ◽  
Rosana Teresa Onocko-Campos

Abstract Background: Although it is known that several factors may influence the access to specialized care, the factors related to the maintenance of a link with Primary Care by patients who accessed Specialized Mental Health Services (SMHS) remain unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the determinants of timely access to SMHS and maintenance of a link with Primary Care. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study, conducted with 341 users of SMHS at outpatient and community level in a medium-sized city in Brazil. Associations between the outcomes and the other variables were explored with the use of Poisson regression models with robust variance estimators. Results: Among the factors associated with the study outcomes, those related to the organization of services and the movement between them were noteworthy. Patients referred by Primary Care were less likely to access specialized services in a timely manner (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.93). However, the referral of cases by Primary Care (RR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.79) and follow-up with visits by Community Health Agents (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.53) appeared to favor maintenance of the patient-Primary Care link. Conclusion: This study reinforces the idea that integration between Primary Care and SMHS should be strengthened, both to reduce waiting times for between-service referrals and benefit continuity of care.


2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (658) ◽  
pp. e314-e320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bosco Baron-Franco ◽  
Gary McLean ◽  
Frances S Mair ◽  
Veronique L Roger ◽  
Bruce Guthrie ◽  
...  

BackgroundComorbidity is common in heart failure, but previous prevalence estimates have been based on a limited number of conditions using mainly non-primary care data sources.AimTo compare prevalence rates of comorbidity and polypharmacy in those with and without chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).Design and settingA cross-sectional study of 1.4 million patients in primary care in Scotland.MethodData on the presence of LVSD, 31 other physical, and seven mental health comorbidities, and prescriptions were extracted from a database of 1 424 378 adults. Comorbidity prevalence was compared in patients with and without LVSD, standardised by age, sex, and deprivation. Pharmacology data were also compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were 17 285 patients (1.2%) who had a diagnosis of LVSD. Compared with standardised controls, the LVSD group had greater comorbidity, with the biggest difference found for seven or more conditions (odds ratio [OR] 4.10; 95% confidence interval (CI] = 3.90 to 4.32). Twenty-five physical conditions and six mental health conditions were significantly more prevalent in those with LVSD relative to standardised controls. Polypharmacy was higher in the LVSD group compared with controls, with the biggest difference found for ≥11 repeat prescriptions (OR 4.81; 95% CI = 4.60 to 5.04). However, these differences in polypharmacy were attenuated after controlling for the number of morbidities, indicating that much of the additional prescribing was accounted for by multimorbidity rather than LVSD per se.ConclusionExtreme comorbidity and polypharmacy is significantly more common in patients with chronic heart failure due to LVSD. The efficient management of such complexity requires the integration of general and specialist expertise.


2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (655) ◽  
pp. e118-e129 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N Blane ◽  
Daniel Mackay ◽  
Bruce Guthrie ◽  
Stewart W Mercer

BackgroundLittle is known about how smoking cessation practices in primary care differ for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) who have different comorbidities.AimTo determine the association between different patterns of comorbidity and smoking rates and smoking cessation interventions in primary care for patients with CHD.Design and settingCross-sectional study of 81 456 adults with CHD in primary care in Scotland.MethodDetails of eight concordant physical comorbidities, 23 discordant physical comorbidities, and eight mental health comorbidities were extracted from electronic health records between April 2006 and March 2007. Multilevel binary logistic regression models were constructed to determine the association between these patterns of comorbidity and smoking status, smoking cessation advice, and smoking cessation medication (nicotine replacement therapy) prescribed.ResultsThe most deprived quintile had nearly three times higher odds of being current smokers than the least deprived (odds ratio [OR] 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.49 to 3.05). People with CHD and two or more mental health comorbidities had more than twice the odds of being current smokers than those with no mental health conditions (OR 2.11; 95% CI = 1.99 to 2.24). Despite this, those with two or more mental health comorbidities (OR 0.77; 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.98) were less likely to receive smoking cessation advice, but absolute differences were small.ConclusionPatterns of comorbidity are associated with variation in smoking status and the delivery of smoking cessation advice among people with CHD in primary care. Those from the most deprived areas and those with mental health problems are considerably more likely to be current smokers and require additional smoking cessation support.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document