scholarly journals Comparison of the success rate after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection among patients with or without a sinus tract

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Deng ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Hongyi Shao ◽  
Baozhan Yu ◽  
Jiying Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Sinus Tract ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Potential Risk Factors

Abstract Background The relevance between the presence of a sinus tract and the failure risk after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip or knee arthroplasty is still unclear. This study aimed to compare the success rate of DAIR between patients with or without a sinus tract and to explore the possible risk factors for failure after DAIR in patients with a sinus tract. Methods Consecutive DAIR cases for PJI after hip or knee arthroplasty between January 2009 and June 2019 with a minimum 1-year follow-up in two tertiary joint arthroplasty centers were included. Patients were classified into the sinus tract group and the non-sinus tract group according to the presence of a sinus tract. The success rate after DAIR were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Potential risk factors for failure in the sinus group were also explored. Results One hundred seven patients were included. At a median 4.4 years of follow-up, 19 of 52 (36.5%) cases failed in the sinus tract group, while 15 of 55 (27.3%) cases failed in the non-sinus tract group. The 1-year and 5-year cumulative success rates were 71.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.8-84.6%) and 56.8% (95% CI: 42.6-75.7%) in the sinus tract group, respectively, which were similar to the counterparts in the non-sinus tract group (P = 0.214). Among patients with a sinus tract, DAIR with the exchange of modular components showed a higher success rate (75.8% versus 47.4%, P = 0.038). Conclusions The presence of a sinus tract does not affect the success rate of DAIR. Modular component exchange in DAIR was proposed for patients with a sinus tract for an improved infection control rate.

Current actual success rate of the two-stage exchange arthroplasty strategy in chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1682-1688
Author(s):  
Pablo S. Corona ◽  
Matías Vicente ◽  
Lluís Carrera ◽  
Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo ◽  
Sebastián Corró
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Medical Issues ◽  
American Society

Aims The success rates of two-stage revision arthroplasty for infection have evolved since their early description. The implementation of internationally accepted outcome criteria led to the readjustment of such rates. However, patients who do not undergo reimplantation are usually set aside from these calculations. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of two-stage revision arthroplasty when considering those who do not undergo reimplantation, and to investigate the characteristics of this subgroup. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with chronic hip or knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with two-stage revision between January 2010 and October 2018, with a minimum follow-up of one year, were included. Variables including demography, morbidity, microbiology, and outcome were collected. The primary endpoint was the eradication of infection. Patients who did not undergo reimplantation were analyzed in order to characterize this subgroup better. Results A total of 162 chronic PJIs were included in the study. After a mean follow-up of 57.3 months (12.1 to 115.7), 18 patients (11.1%) did not undergo reimplantation, due either to medical issues (10), the patient’s choice (4), or death (4). When only considering those who underwent reimplantation, the success rate was 80.6%. However, when those who did not undergo reimplantation were included, the success rate dropped to 71.6%. Advanced age, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade ≥ III, McPherson’s C host, and Gram-negative related PJI were independent risk factors for retention of the spacer. The mortality was higher in the non-reimplanted group. Conclusion The real success rate of two-stage revision may not be as high as previously reported. The exclusion of patients who do not undergo reimplantation resulted in a 9% overestimation of the success rate in this series. Many comorbidity-related risk factors for retention of the spacer were identified, as well as higher death rates in this group. Efforts should be made to optimize these patients medically in order to increase reimplantation and success rates, while decreasing mortality. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1682–1688.

scholarly journals Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Steinicke ◽  
J. Schwarze ◽  
G. Gosheger ◽  
B. Moellenbeck ◽  
T. Ackmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Exchange Arthroplasty ◽  
Parametric Testing

Abstract Introduction Two-stage revision is a frequently chosen approach to treat chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, management of recurrent infection after a two-stage exchange remains debated and the outcome of a repeat two-stage procedure is unclear. This study investigates the success rates of repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty and analyzes possible risk factors for failure. Materials and methods We retrospectively identified 55 patients (23 hips, 32 knees) who were treated with repeat resection arthroplasty and planned delayed reimplantation for recurrent periprosthetic joint infection between 2010 and 2019 after a prior two-stage revision at the same institution. The minimum follow-up was 12 months with a median follow-up time of 34 months (IQR 22–51). The infection-free survival, associated revision surgeries, and potential risk factors for further revision were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and comparative non-parametric testing. Results 78% (43/55) underwent reimplantation after a repeat implant removal. Of those who completed the second-stage surgery, 37% (16/43) underwent additional revision for infection and 14% (6/55) underwent amputation. The reinfection-free implant survivorship amounted to 77% (95% CI 64–89%) after 1 year and 38% (95% CI 18–57%) after 5 years. Patients with a higher comorbidity score were less likely to undergo second-stage reimplantation (median 5 vs. 3, p = 0.034). Furthermore, obese patients (p = 0.026, Fisher’s exact test) and diabetics (p < 0.001, log-rank test) had a higher risk for further infection. Most commonly cultures yielded polymicrobial growth at the repeat two-stage exchange (27%, 15/55) and at re-reinfection (32%, 9/28). Pathogen persistence was observed in 21% (6/28) of re-reinfected patients. Conclusion The success rates after repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty are low. Patients must be counseled accordingly and different modes of treatment should be considered.

scholarly journals Risk factors affect success rate of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in periprosthetic joint infection

Arthroplasty ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yihong Xu ◽  
Liping Wang ◽  
Weidong Xu
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Sinus Tract ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
High Quality Research ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Heavy Burden ◽  
Hospital Stays

Abstract Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most devastating complication of joint replacement that seriously affects the quality of life and causes a heavy burden to the families and society. Due to shorter hospital stays, lower costs, improved joint function and less morbidity, a process of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is recommended as the preferred treatment for acute periprosthetic joint infection. However, the factors that impact the success rate of DAIR remain controversial. This article evaluates the influential factors of DAIR and provides insights for orthopaedics surgeons to make optimal decisions to improve the success rate of DAIR. Conclusion The poor general condition of patients, high preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) level, repeated joint surgeries, and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections may be associated with lower DAIR success rate. To the contrary, early surgery, radical debridement, exchange of removable components, washing with iodine and vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) may improve the success rate of DAIR. A sinus tract may not be absolutely contraindicated, but surgeons should treat it with caution. As there is no consensus on many issues, more high-quality research is required.

scholarly journals Low frequency of local findings in periprosthetic hip infection caused by low-virulent bacteria compared to periprosthetic knee infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Imagama ◽  
Kazushige Seki ◽  
Toshihiro Seki ◽  
Yuta Matsuki ◽  
Kazuhiro Yamazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Sinus Tract ◽  
Musculoskeletal Infection ◽  
Knee Infection ◽  
Hip Infection ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
Periprosthetic Knee Infection

AbstractPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is suspected when local findings such as pain, swelling, hyperthermia, and sinus tract are present. However, the frequency of these findings and the difference between hip and knee are unclear. This study compared the positive rates of local findings in periprosthetic hip infection (PHI) with periprosthetic knee infection (PKI), and aimed to identify potential risk factors associated with the frequency. One hundred one PJI (46 hips and 55 knees) fulfilled the 2018 Musculoskeletal infection society criteria were analysed retrospectively to assess the positive rates of each local finding. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of each local finding, and the influence of two potential risk factors [body mass index (BMI) and C-reactive protein (CRP)] was investigated. Causative bacterial species were divided into high and low-virulent groups, and then culture negative cases were included in low-virulent group. PHI had significantly lower rates of pain, swelling and hyperthermia compared to PKI. Overall, up to one-third of PHI had pain as only symptom. High BMI and low-virulent bacteria were associated with lower frequency of swelling and hyperthermia in PHI. CRP had no impact on positive rates of local findings. PHI was oligosymptomatic in a significant percentage of cases. This is particularly important in obese patients and infection by low-virulent bacteria.

scholarly journals Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Is a Viable Treatment Option for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection Presenting More Than 4 Weeks After Index Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 630-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia A M Löwik ◽  
Javad Parvizi ◽  
Paul C Jutte ◽  
Wierd P Zijlstra ◽  
Bas A S Knobben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Time Point ◽  
Viable Treatment

Abstract Background The success of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) largely depends on the presence of a mature biofilm. At what time point DAIR should be disrecommended is unknown. This multicenter study evaluated the outcome of DAIR in relation to the time after index arthroplasty. Methods We retrospectively evaluated PJIs occurring within 90 days after surgery and treated with DAIR. Patients with bacteremia, arthroscopic debridements, and a follow-up &lt;1 year were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as (1) any further surgical procedure related to infection; (2) PJI-related death; or (3) use of long-term suppressive antibiotics. Results We included 769 patients. Treatment failure occurred in 294 patients (38%) and was similar between time intervals from index arthroplasty to DAIR: the failure rate for Week 1–2 was 42% (95/226), the rate for Week 3–4 was 38% (143/378), the rate for Week 5–6 was 29% (29/100), and the rate for Week 7–12 was 42% (27/65). An exchange of modular components was performed to a lesser extent in the early post-surgical course compared with the late course (41% vs 63%, respectively; P &lt; .001). The causative microorganisms, comorbidities, and durations of symptoms were comparable between time intervals. Conclusions DAIR is a viable option in patients with early PJI presenting more than 4 weeks after index surgery, as long as DAIR is performed within at least 1 week after the onset of symptoms and modular components can be exchanged.

scholarly journals Deep infection after hip hemiarthroplasty: risk factors for infection and outcome of treatments

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 958-965
Author(s):  
Simon Craxford ◽  
Ben A. Marson ◽  
Jessica Nightingale ◽  
Adeel Ikram ◽  
Yuvraj Agrawal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Cemented Arthroplasty ◽  
Deep Surgical Site Infection ◽  
One Year ◽  
Excision Arthroplasty

Aims Deep surgical site infection (SSI) remains an unsolved problem after hip fracture. Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) has become a mainstream treatment in elective periprosthetic joint infection; however, evidence for DAIR after infected hip hemiarthroplaty is limited. Methods Patients who underwent a hemiarthroplasty between March 2007 and August 2018 were reviewed. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify and adjust for risk factors for SSI, and to identify factors predicting a successful DAIR at one year. Results A total of 3,966 patients were identified. The overall rate of SSI was 1.7% (51 patients (1.3%) with deep SSI, and 18 (0.45%) with superficial SSI). In all, 50 patients underwent revision surgery for infection (43 with DAIR, and seven with excision arthroplasty). After adjustment for other variables, only concurrent urinary tract infection (odds ratio (OR) 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57 to 4.92; p < 0.001) and increasing delay to theatre for treatment of the fracture (OR 1.31 per day, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.52; p < 0.001) were predictors of developing a SSI, while a cemented arthroplasty was protective (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.96; p = 0.031). In all, nine patients (20.9%) were alive at one year with a functioning hemiarthroplasty following DAIR, 20 (46.5%) required multiple surgical debridements after an initial DAIR, and 18 were converted to an excision arthroplasty due to persistent infection, with six were alive at one year. The culture of any gram-negative organism reduced success rates to 12.5% (no cases were successful with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas infection). Favourable organisms included Citrobacter and Proteus (100% cure rate). The all-cause mortality at one year after deep SSI was 55.87% versus 24.9% without deep infection. Conclusion Deep infection remains a devastating complication regardless of the treatment strategy employed. Success rates of DAIR are poor compared to total hip arthroplasty, and should be reserved for favourable organisms in patients able to tolerate multiple surgical procedures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):958–965.

Surgical Site Infection After Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Cohort Study Using a Hospital Database

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 1198-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Grammatico-Guillon ◽  
Sabine Baron ◽  
Philippe Rosset ◽  
Christophe Gaborit ◽  
Louis Bernard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Prosthetic Material ◽  
Hospital Database ◽  
Prosthetic Joint

BACKGROUNDHip or knee arthroplasty infection (HKAI) leads to heavy medical consequences even if rare.OBJECTIVETo assess the routine use of a hospital discharge detection algorithm of prosthetic joint infection as a novel additional tool for surveillance.METHODSA historic 5-year cohort study was built using a hospital database of people undergoing a first hip or knee arthroplasty in 1 French region (2.5 million inhabitants, 39 private and public hospitals): 32,678 patients with arthroplasty code plus corresponding prosthetic material code were tagged. HKAI occurrence was then tracked in the follow-up on the basis of a previously validated algorithm using International Statistical Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, codes as well as the surgical procedures coded. HKAI density incidence was estimated during the follow-up (up to 4 years after surgery); risk factors were analyzed using Cox regression.RESULTSA total of 604 HKAI patients were identified: 1-year HKAI incidence was1.31%, and density incidence was 2.2/100 person-years in hip and 2.5/100 person-years in knee. HKAI occurred within the first 30 days after surgery for 30% but more than 1 year after replacement for 29%. Patients aged 75 years or older, male, or having liver diseases, alcohol abuse, or ulcer sore had higher risk of infection. The inpatient case fatality in HKAI patients was 11.4%.CONCLUSIONSThe hospital database method used to measure occurrence and risk factors of prosthetic joint infection helped to survey HKAI and could optimize healthcare delivery.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36(10):1198–1207

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document