scholarly journals Editorial: the political determinants of health inequities and universal health coverage

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Kristine Kittelsen ◽  
Sakiko Fukuda-Parr ◽  
Katerini Tagmatarchi Storeng
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Shahiq Rizvi ◽  
Rundell Douglas ◽  
Owain D Williams ◽  
Peter S Hill

Abstract The uptake and implementation of universal health coverage (UHC) is primarily a political, rather than a technical, exercise, with contested ideas and diverse stakeholders capable of facilitation or resistance—even veto—of the policy uptake. This narrative systematic review, undertaken in 2018, sought to identify all peer-reviewed publications dealing with concepts relating to UHC through a political economy framing. Of the 627 papers originally identified, 55 papers were directly relevant, with an additional eight papers added manually on referral from colleagues. The thematic analysis adapted Fox and Reich’s framework of ideas and ideologies, interests and institutions to organize the analysis. The results identified a literature strong in its exploration of the ideologies and ideas that underpin UHC, but with an apparent bias in authorship towards more rights-based, left-leaning perspectives. Despite this, political economy analyses of country case studies suggested a more diverse political framing for UHC, with the interests and institutions engaged in implementation drawing on pragmatic and market-based mechanisms to achieve outcomes. Case studies offered limited detail on the role played by specific interests, though the influence of global development trends was evident, as was the role of donor organizations. Most country case studies, however, framed the development of UHC within a narrative of national ownership, with steps in implementation often critical political milestones. The development of institutions for UHC implementation was predicated largely on available infrastructure, with elements of that infrastructure—federal systems, user fees, pre-existing insurance schemes—needing to be accommodated in the incremental progress towards UHC. The need for technical competence to deliver ideological promises was underlined. The review concludes that, despite the disparate sources for the analyses, there is an emerging shared narrative in the growing literature around the political economy of UHC that offers an increasing awareness of the political dimensions to UHC uptake and implementation.


The Lancet ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 385 (9975) ◽  
pp. 1343-1351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Odorico Monteiro de Andrade ◽  
Alberto Pellegrini Filho ◽  
Orielle Solar ◽  
Félix Rígoli ◽  
Lígia Malagon de Salazar ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shannon Berg

Fisher et al have provided a solid addition to health policy literature in their finding that universal health coverage supports equitable access to Australian primary healthcare (PHC), despite factors such as episodic care and poor distribution of services. Their definition of PHC was comprehensive, extending beyond medical care to include social determinants of health and public policy. However, they limited their operational definition for purposes of the study to general practice, community health and allied health. Applying a narrower definition risks lost opportunities to identify policy implications for equity beyond financial accessibility. The populations most at risk of non-communicable diseases also face significant language, culture, and individual and systemic discrimination barriers to access. Future policy research should consider using a comprehensive PHC definition in determining variables of interest and designing research methodologies, to avoid missing important knowledge that allows existing biases within primary care to continue.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Anchana NaRanong

The Thai universal health coverage scheme (UHCS), or “30 Baht Scheme”, has played an important role in increasing the accessibility of health care services for low income earners. The objective of this paper is to study poor beneficiaries’ awareness of the UHCS. Quantitative research methods were employed. Data were collected, and multiple regression performed, to explore the determinants of health coverage awareness. The regression shows that age, education level, and number of years as card holder are significant determinants of health coverage awareness. Those with a higher age or level of education scored higher than those who were younger or with a low level of education or no education. Those who held UHCS cards for long periods of time possessed higher health coverage awareness than those who had recently received their membership cards. Greater exposure to news and information, therefore, is needed for those of a younger age and those who have less education, if awareness is to be increased. The same applies to those who have only held UHCS cards for a short period.


Global Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (S6) ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
Katerini Tagmatarchi Storeng ◽  
Sakiko Fukuda‐Parr ◽  
Manjari Mahajan ◽  
Sridhar Venkatapuram

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Dawes

Since January 2020, the U.S. has had over 150,000 deaths attributed to the Coronavirus, and morbidity and mortality rates continue to rise. In the United States, minorities are more likely to die from COVID-19 than other populations - a fact that further solidifies the disparate nature of race and ethnicity relative to one’s health and the inequities in care. COVID-19 has not struck all equally because our economic and social policies have not benefited all equally. This paper introduces a new model, the political determinants of health, which focuses on their role in creating, perpetuating, and exacerbating health inequities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document