scholarly journals Research led by people who use drugs: centering the expertise of lived experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zach R. Salazar ◽  
Louise Vincent ◽  
Mary C. Figgatt ◽  
Michael K. Gilbert ◽  
Nabarun Dasgupta
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Drug Market ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Medical Community ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Research Collaborations ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Research collaborations between people who use drugs (PWUD) and researchers are largely underutilized, despite the long history of successful, community-led harm reduction interventions and growing health disparities experienced by PWUD. PWUD play a critical role in identifying emerging issues in the drug market, as well as associated health behaviors and outcomes. As such, PWUD are well positioned to meaningfully participate in all aspects of the research process, including population of research questions, conceptualization of study design, and contextualization of findings. Main body We argue PWUD embody unparalleled and current insight to drug use behaviors, including understanding of novel synthetic drug bodies and the dynamics at play in the drug market; they also hold intimate and trusting relationships with other PWUD. This perfectly situates PWUD to collaborate with researchers in investigation of drug use behaviors and development of harm reduction interventions. While PWUD have a history of mistrust with the medical community, community-led harm reduction organizations have earned their trust and are uniquely poised to facilitate research projects. We offer the North Carolina Survivors Union as one such example, having successfully conducted a number of projects with reputable research institutions. We also detail the fallacy of meaningful engagement posed by traditional mechanisms of capturing community voice. As a counter, we detail the framework developed and implemented by the union in hopes it may serve as guidance for other community-led organizations. We also situate research as a mechanism to diversify the job opportunities available to PWUD and offer a real-time example of the integration of these principles into public policy and direct service provision. Conclusion In order to effectively mitigate the risks posed by the fluid and volatile drug market, research collaborations must empower PWUD to play meaningful roles in the entirety of the research process. Historically, the most effective harm reduction interventions have been born of the innovation and heart possessed by PWUD; during the current overdose crisis, there is no reason to believe they will not continue to be.

Harm Reduction Policy for the Opioid Epidemic

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yngvild Olsen ◽  
Joshua M. Sharfstein
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Harm Reduction ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Opioid Epidemic ◽  
Negative Consequences

What is harm reduction? Harm reduction is “a set of practical strategies aimed at reducing negative consequences associated with drug use.” It is also “a movement for social justice built on a belief in, and respect for, the rights of people who use drugs.”...

scholarly journals Harm reduction via online platforms for people who use drugs in Russia: a qualitative analysis of web outreach work

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arsen Davitadze ◽  
Peter Meylakhs ◽  
Aleksey Lakhov ◽  
Elizabeth J. King
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Injection Drug Use ◽  
Injection Drug ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Online Platforms ◽  
Outreach Work ◽  
Outreach Workers

Abstract Background Harm reduction services to people who use drugs (PWUD) in Russia are insufficient in terms of quantity, government endorsement, and accessibility. The situation has recently deteriorated even further because of social distancing measures of the COVID-19 pandemic. Several organizations have started to provide some harm reduction services via online platforms by web outreach. However, little is known on how online outreach services are organized and implemented. Drawing on the example of St. Petersburg-based NGO “Humanitarian Action,” we explored web outreach work in Telegram instant messenger. Methods Our data were comprised of 4 semi-structured interviews with the NGO staff and 301 cases of web outreach work with PWUD. We used thematic analysis to study the process of web outreach, harm reduction service provision, and needs of PWUD. Results Three stages of the process of web outreach work were identified: clients initiating communication, NGO workers addressing clients’ needs, and NGO workers receiving clients’ feedback. Communication proceeded in group chat or direct messages. Challenges in addressing clients’ needs happened when clients turned for help after hours, sent recorded voice messages, sent unclear messages, and/or were unwilling to transition to telephone communication. All web outreach workers reported receiving only positive feedback on their work. The needs of PWUD were categorized into two major themes, depending on whether they can be addressed fully or partially online. In cases of online only provision of services, web outreach workers helped PWUD treat minor injection drug use complications, obtain verified harm reduction information and receive general psychological support. In instances of partial online services provision, PWUD were assisted in getting treatment of severe injection drug use complications, overdoses, and in accessing offline medical, psychological, social, legal and harm reduction services. Conclusions Our research demonstrated that web outreach work is a convenient tool for delivering some harm reduction services to PWUD either partially or completely online and for recruiting new clients (including hard-to-reach PWUD that avoid attending brick-and-mortar facilities). Harm reduction organizations should consider incorporating online harm reduction services into their activities. However, further research is needed to explore relative advantages and disadvantages of online harm reduction services.

Harm Reduction Services in Ottawa: The Culture of Drug Use

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-202
Author(s):  
Marlene Haines ◽  
Patrick O'Byrne
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Physical Environment ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Cultural Norms ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Access To Services ◽  
Policy Changes ◽  
Best Practice Guidelines ◽  
Depth Interviews

Between January 2016 and June 2019, there were over 13,900 apparent opioid-related deaths in Canada, solidifying the need for appropriate and effective services for people who use drugs (PWUD). Within government initiatives and policies, PWUD are often inappropriately considered a homogeneous group of individuals, with implementation of services nationally often being guided by these governmental bodies without meaningful consultation and collaboration with PWUD. However, recent harm reduction research and best practice guidelines have emphasized the importance of tailoring services to local drug scenes. Despite this, very little research on the cultural norms of PWUD exists in the literature. In an attempt to explore the local culture of drug use in Ottawa, a literature review ultimately uncovered very few articles on this topic. However, by expanding the search beyond Ottawa and using a social determinants of health framework, the factors of culture, income and social status, physical environment, and access to services were revealed as unique experiences for PWUD. Further, through four in-depth interviews with current harm reduction providers in Ottawa, the themes of (1) uncertainty and concerns surrounding the overdose crisis; (2) lack of flexibility in resources and access issues; and (3) diversity in the culture of drug use in Ottawa were explored. Recommendations surrounding partnering with PWUD, policy changes, and a safer supply were subsequently discussed. These findings helped to validate the reality of the unique drug-use culture in Ottawa, and the requirement for harm reduction services to be adapted to the local needs of PWUD.

scholarly journals A critical exploration of professional perceptions of harm reduction policy and practice in Vietnam

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Tuan Dung Truong
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Brain Diseases ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Public Health Perspective ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative Methods ◽  
Reduction Strategies

<p>Throughout the 1990s, Vietnam experienced a dramatic rise in the prevalence of HIV among people who use drugs. In response, Vietnam’s Ministry of Health implemented several legal and policy interventions in the name of harm reduction. However, perceptions about drug use, people who use drugs, addiction and the nature of official interventions are contested. For many Vietnamese officials, abstinence remains the dominant philosophy. Drug use is considered a ‘social evil’ in Vietnam and people who use drugs face draconian controls and incarceration in the name of treatment and crime prevention.  Against this background, this thesis explores how key stakeholders perceive harm reduction philosophy and how they apply it in policy and practice. Based on qualitative and quantitative methods, it presents findings from a survey with 250 respondents and 26 semi-structured interviews, all with professionals involved in responding to drug use in Vietnam. The thesis illustrates that these professionals prefer abstinence approaches, and often see addiction as the result of moral failings and brain diseases.  While some interventions in the name of harm reduction are accepted, they are firmly rooted within a narrow public health perspective. Professional misperceptions about the key principles and practices of ‘authentic’ harm reduction are widespread. Many professionals believe, for example, that harms can only be limited through reductions in the demand and supply of drugs, or that detaining people who use drugs in compulsory treatment centres is a form of harm reduction.  These rationales have resulted in continuing police crackdowns, and the use of ‘pseudo’ harm reduction strategies to control and punish people who use drugs. Meanwhile, there are limited official attempts to address problems experienced by people who use drugs, like social isolation, stigma, discrimination, human rights violations, or problems of community reintegration. In conclusion, while a harm reduction rhetoric is regularly employed in Vietnam, ‘pseudo’ harm reduction strategies are carried out.</p>

The “Drugs-Crime Nexus”

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique de Andrade
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Good Evidence ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Reduction Strategies ◽  
At Risk Populations ◽  
Prison Populations ◽  
The Impact

The prioritization of imprisonment as a response to drug use in many countries has led to growing prison populations, with little impact on drug use, drug-related harm, or drug-related crime. There is increased international debate around how to best manage and respond to at-risk populations, with good evidence to suggest that embracing harm reduction strategies in the community and in prison can lead to reduced rates of imprisonment, infectious disease, and other preventable harms. Despite this, evidence-based treatment and harm reduction programs have largely failed to penetrate the walls of correctional institutions in most countries. This chapter provides an overview of major drug groups and explores the impact of drug policy on international imprisonment rates, and the diversity of responses to people who use drugs in the community and prison. The potential for corrections to play a significant therapeutic role in addressing the urgent treatment and harm reduction needs of at-risk, drug-using populations in prison and during their transition back to the community is highlighted.

scholarly journals Challenges of creative collaboration in geographical research

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-310
Author(s):  
Candice P Boyd ◽  
Kaya Barry
Keyword(s):  
Research Team ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Research Assistant ◽  
Creative Collaboration ◽  
Arts Based Research ◽  
Research Dissemination ◽  
Research Collaborations ◽  
Art Practices ◽  
Creative Research ◽  
History Of

There is a long history of collaboration between artists and geographers, with creative forms of research and dissemination of findings taking shape as artworks. In addition, there has been significant push from academia for researchers to maximise their research in ways that cater to, and engage with, broader public audiences. Art and creative practices tap into this through formats such as exhibitions, performances and participatory workshops which draw upon arts-based research methodologies with which geographers are becoming increasingly engaged. However, with this enthusiasm to adopt art practices for research dissemination purposes, tensions can arise in determining the levels of collaboration and authorship between artists and geographers, especially when the artist is employed as a research assistant on the project. In this ‘In Practice’ article, we explore the tensions and challenges that creative collaborations produce with respect to copyright and authorship, specialist skills and the delicate balance of doing creative research as part of a research team. We argue that geographers and artists need to address these issues from the outset and revisit them throughout the research process, and we offer some suggestions for how art–geography research collaborations might best be negotiated.

scholarly journals Drug use practices among people who inject drugs in a context of drug market changes: Challenges for optimal coverage of harm reduction programs

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Élise Roy ◽  
Nelson Arruda ◽  
Pascale Leclerc ◽  
Carole Morissette ◽  
Caty Blanchette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Harm Reduction ◽  
People Who Inject Drugs ◽  
Drug Market ◽  
Market Changes

scholarly journals An ethical analysis of UK drug policy as an example of a criminal justice approach to drugs: a commentary on the short film Putting UK Drug Policy into Focus

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Holland
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Drug Policy ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
War On Drugs ◽  
Current Approach ◽  
Convincing Evidence ◽  
Short Film ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Related Harm

Abstract Background Drug-related deaths in the UK are at the highest level on record—the war on drugs has failed. A short film has been produced intended for public and professional audiences featuring academics, representatives of advocacy organisations, police and policymakers outlining the problems with, and highlighting alternative approaches to, UK drug policy. A range of ethical arguments are alluded to, which are distilled here in greater depth for interested viewers and a wider professional and academic readership. Main body The war on drugs is seemingly driven by the idea that the consumption of illegal drugs is immoral. However, the meaning ascribed to ‘drug’ in the illicit sense encompasses a vast range of substances with different properties that have as much in common with legal drugs as they do with each other. The only property that distinguishes illegal from legal drugs is their legal status, which rather than being based on an assessment of how dangerous they are has been defined by centuries of socio-political idiosyncrasies. The consequences of criminalising people who use drugs often outweigh the risks they face from drug use, and there is not convincing evidence that this prevents wider drug use or drug-related harm. Additionally, punishing someone as a means, to the end of deterring others from drug use, is ethically problematic. Although criminalising the production of harmful drugs may seem more ethically tenable, it has not reduced the supply of drugs and it precludes effective regulation of the market. Other potential policy approaches are highlighted, which would be ethically preferable to existing punitive policy. Conclusion It is not possible to eliminate all drug use and associated harms. The current approach is not only ineffective in preventing drug-related harm but itself directly and indirectly causes incalculable harm to those who use drugs and to wider society. For policymakers to gain the mandate to rationalise drug policy, or to be held accountable if they do not, wider engagement with the electorate is required. It is hoped that this film will encourage at least a few to give pause and reflect on how drug policy might be improved.

scholarly journals Harm reduction via online platforms for people who use drugs in Russia: A qualitative analysis of web outreach work

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arsen Davitadze ◽  
Peter Meylakhs ◽  
Aleksey Lakhov ◽  
Elizabeth J. King
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Injection Drug Use ◽  
Injection Drug ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Services Delivery ◽  
Online Platforms ◽  
Outreach Work ◽  
Outreach Workers

Abstract Background Harm reduction services to people who use drugs (PWUD) in Russia are insufficient in terms of quantity, government endorsement, and accessibility. The situation has recently deteriorated even further because of social distancing measures of the COVID-19 pandemic. Recently several harm reduction organizations have started to provide some harm reduction services via online platforms by web outreach. However, little is known on how online outreach services are organized and implemented. Drawing on the example of St. Petersburg-based NGO “Humanitarian Action” we explored web outreach work in Telegram instant messenger. Methods 4 semi-structured interviews with the NGO staff and 301 cases of web outreach work with PWUD comprised the dataset. The process of web outreach, service provision to PWUD, and PWUD’s needs were thematically analyzed. Results Three stages of the process of web outreach work were determined: clients initiating communication, NGO workers addressing clients’ needs, and NGO workers receiving clients’ feedback. Communication proceeded either in group chat or in direct messages. Challenges in addressing clients’ needs happened when clients turned for help in nighttime, sent recorded voice messages, sent unclear messages, and/or were unwilling to transition to telephone communication. All web outreach workers reported receiving only positive feedback on their work. PWUD’s needs were categorized into two major themes, depending on whether they can be addressed fully or partially online. In cases of online only provision of services, web outreach workers helped PWUD treat minor injection drug use complications, obtain verified harm reduction information and receive general psychological support. In instances of partial online services provision, PWUD were assisted in getting treatment of severe injection drug use complications, overdoses, and in accessing offline medical, psychological, social, legal and harm reduction services. Conclusions Our research demonstrated that web outreach work is a convenient tool for delivering some harm reduction services to PWUD either partially or completely online and recruiting new clients (including hard-to-reach PWUD that avoid attending brick-and-mortar facilities). It indicates that harm reduction organizations should consider incorporating online harm reduction services into their activities. However, more research is needed to explore relative advantages and disadvantages of online harm reduction services delivery.

scholarly journals 612. Empowering Patients with Addiction to Self-Administer Parenteral Antibiotics at Home: A Pilot Project

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S409-S410
Author(s):  
Emily Hoff ◽  
Bilal Ashraf ◽  
Jillian Smartt ◽  
Kapila Marambage ◽  
Kavita Bhavan
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Parenteral Antibiotic ◽  
Addiction Severity ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Nearly 20% of people in the United States use drugs each year. People who use drugs (PWUD) are predisposed to complex infections that require long term intravenous (IV) antibiotics. A frequent clinical quandary in PWUD is safe administration of extended IV antibiotics. Current standard of care is IV antibiotic administration in skilled nursing facilities. In this system, PWUD frequently do not finish antibiotic therapy, resulting in avoidable complications of untreated infections and increased healthcare utilization. We present a pilot study of ten patients with a history of addiction who required long-term IV antibiotics to evaluate the feasibility of self administered outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (S-OPAT) for PWUD. Methods Ten patients who had a history of mild addiction and stable housing, social support and transportation were enrolled at Parkland Health and Hospital System to complete S-OPAT. We extracted demographic, drug use, clinical and access to care variables and patients were followed with weekly clinical appointments. Addiction severity was defined using the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) -Modified ASSIST Score. We completed post-intervention surveys to evaluate the impact of the intervention on provider-patient trust. Results A total of 10 patients were enrolled in S-OPAT (Table 1). The patients were 48 years old on average, all were male and seven were Hispanic. All patients had stimulant use disorder and no patients had commercial insurance. Treated infections were bone/ joint and skin/soft tissue in origin. All patients completed their antibiotic course, nearly all appointments were attended (96%) and there were no 30-day hospital readmissions (Table 2). More than two-third of patients experienced improvement in addiction severity with progress in multiple psychosocial factors including housing instability, social support and legal problems (Figure 1; Table 2). Table 1. Demographic, substance use and clinical variables among people who use drugs enrolled in the pilot project for S-OPAT (N=10). Table 2. Clinical, drug use and psychosocial outcomes among people who use drugs and received S-OPAT (N=10). Addiction severity was defined using the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) -Modified ASSIST Score. Figure 1. Progression of addiction severity before and after completion of self-administered outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy pilot among patients with a history of drug use (N=10). Addiction severity was defined using the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) -Modified ASSIST Score. Conclusion We demonstrate that PWUD can successfully complete S-OPAT with simultaneous improvement in addiction severity and psychosocial factors. We hope to create a framework for the patient-centered administration of extended courses of antibiotics for PWUD and to advocate for the expansion of individualized approaches to extended courses of IV antibiotics for PWUD. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document