scholarly journals Individual and joint contributions of genetic and methylation risk scores for enhancing lung cancer risk stratification: data from a population-based cohort in Germany

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haixin Yu ◽  
Janhavi R. Raut ◽  
Ben Schöttker ◽  
Bernd Holleczek ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Harada ◽  
Kazuaki Miyamaoto ◽  
Masami Kimura ◽  
Tetsuro Ishigami ◽  
Kiyomi Taniyama ◽  
...  

Background Assuming that the entire airway is affected by the same inhaled carcinogen, similar molecular alterations may occur in the lung and oral cavity. Thus, we hypothesized that DNA methylation profiles in the oral epithelium may be a promising biomarker for lung cancer risk stratification. Methods A methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was performed on oral epithelium from 16 patients with lung cancer and 32 controls without lung cancer. Genes showing aberrant methylation profiles in the oral epithelium were compared between patients and controls. Results The analysis revealed that HOXD11 and PCDHGB6 were methylated more frequently in patients than in controls ( p = 0.0055 and p = 0.0247, respectively). Combined analyses indicated that 8 of 16 (50%) patients and 3 of 32 (9.4%) controls showed DNA methylation in both genes ( p = 0.0016). Among the population limited to current and former smokers, 6 of 11 (54.5%) patients showed methylation in both genes, compared to 1 of 17 (5.9%) controls ( p = 0.0037). In a subgroup analysis limited to the population above 50-years old, 8 of 16 (50%) patients and 2 of 16 (12.5%) controls showed methylation in both genes ( p = 0.0221). Conclusions The results of this study indicate that specific gene methylation in the oral epithelium might be a promising biomarker for lung cancer risk assessment, especially among smokers. Risk stratification through the analysis of DNA methylation profiles in the oral epithelium may be a useful and less invasive first-step approach in an efficient two-step lung cancer screening strategy.


2021 ◽  
pp. 137-151
Author(s):  
Rohit Rastogi ◽  
Mukund Rastogi ◽  
D. K. Chaturvedi ◽  
Sheelu Sagar ◽  
Neeti Tandon

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 1365-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perfenia Paul Pletnikoff ◽  
Jari A. Laukkanen ◽  
Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen ◽  
Jussi Kauhanen ◽  
Rainer Rauramaa ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Lee ◽  
Tram Lam ◽  
Dario Consonni ◽  
Agnela Pesatori ◽  
Pier Bertazzi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 3303-3316
Author(s):  
Ali Khawaja ◽  
Brian J. Bartholmai ◽  
Srinivasan Rajagopalan ◽  
Ronald A. Karwoski ◽  
Cyril Varghese ◽  
...  

Thorax ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 858-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick C Yong ◽  
Keith Sigel ◽  
Juan Pablo de-Torres ◽  
Grace Mhango ◽  
Minal Kale ◽  
...  

PurposeLung cancer risk models optimise screening by identifying subjects at highest risk, but none of them consider emphysema, a risk factor identifiable on baseline screen. Subjects with a negative baseline low-dose CT (LDCT) screen are at lower risk for subsequent diagnosis and may benefit from risk stratification prior to additional screening, thus we investigated the role of radiographic emphysema as an additional predictor of lung cancer diagnosis in participants with negative baseline LDCT screens of the National Lung Screening Trial.MethodsOur cohorts consist of participants with a negative baseline (T0) LDCT screen (n=16 624) and participants who subsequently had a negative 1-year follow-up (T1) screen (n=14 530). Lung cancer risk scores were calculated using the Bach, PLCOm2012 and Liverpool Lung Project models. Risk of incident lung cancer diagnosis at the end of the study and number screened per incident lung cancer were compared between participants with and without radiographic emphysema.ResultsRadiographic emphysema was independently associated with nearly double the hazard of lung cancer diagnosis at both the second (T1) and third (T2) annual LDCT in all three risk models (HR range 1.9–2.0, p<0.001 for all comparisons). The number screened per incident lung cancer was considerably lower in participants with radiographic emphysema (62 vs 28 at T1 and 91 vs 40 at T2).ConclusionRadiographic emphysema is an independent predictor of lung cancer diagnosis and may help guide decisions surrounding further screening for eligible patients.


2000 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Gustavsson ◽  
Robert Jakobsson ◽  
Fredrik Nyberg ◽  
Göran Pershagen ◽  
Lars Järup ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren R Brenner ◽  
Rayjean J Hung ◽  
Ming-Sound Tsao ◽  
Frances A Shepherd ◽  
Michael R Johnston ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document