scholarly journals iRECIST: how to do it

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorsten Persigehl ◽  
Simon Lennartz ◽  
Lawrence H. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Working Group ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Response Patterns ◽  
Objective Monitoring ◽  
Oncologic Patients ◽  
Cytotoxic Therapies ◽  
Near Future

Abstract Background iRECIST for the objective monitoring of immunotherapies was published by the official RECIST working group in 2017. Main body Immune-checkpoint inhibitors represent one of the most important therapy advancements in modern oncology. They are currently used for treatment of multiple malignant diseases especially at advanced, metastatic stages which were poorly therapeutically accessible in the past. Promising results of recent studies suggest that their application will further grow in the near future, particularly when used in combination with chemotherapy. A challenging aspect of these immunotherapies is that they may show atypical therapy response patterns such as pseudoprogression and demonstrate a different imaging spectrum of adverse reactions, both of which are crucial for radiologists to understand. In 2017 the RECIST working group published a modified set of response criteria, iRECIST, for immunotherapy, based on RECIST 1.1 which was developed for cytotoxic therapies and adapted for targeted agents. Conclusion This article provides guidance for response assessment of oncologic patients under immunotherapy based on iRECIST criteria.

scholarly journals Impact of PET/CT for Assessing Response to Immunotherapy—A Clinical Perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3483
Author(s):  
David Lang ◽  
Gerald Wahl ◽  
Nikolaus Poier ◽  
Sebastian Graf ◽  
David Kiesl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Response Prediction ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Ct Imaging ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Pet Ct

Cancer immunotherapy using immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of various malignancies like non-small-cell lung cancer or melanoma. Pre-therapy response prediction and assessment during ICI treatment is challenging due to the lack of reliable biomarkers and the possibility of atypical radiological response patterns. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) enables the visualization and quantification of metabolic lesion activity additional to conventional CT imaging. Various biomarkers derived from PET/CT have been reported as predictors for response to ICI and may aid to overcome the challenges clinicians currently face in the management of ICI-treated patients. In this narrative review, experts in nuclear medicine, thoracic oncology, dermatooncology, hemato- and internal oncology, urological and head/neck tumors performed literature reviews in their respective field and a joint discussion on the use of PET/CT in the context of ICI treatment. The aims were to give a clinical overview on present standards and evidence, to identify current challenges and fields of research and to enable an outlook to future developments and their possible implications. Multiple promising studies concerning ICI response assessment or prediction using biomarkers derived from PET/CT alone or as composite biomarkers have been identified for various malignancies and disease stages. Of interest, additional major incentives in the field may evolve from novel tracers specifically targeting immune-checkpoint molecules which could allow not only response assessment and prognosis, but also visualization of histological tumor cell properties like programmed death-ligand (PD-L1) expression in vivo. Despite the broad range of existing literature on PET/CT-derived biomarkers in ICI therapy, implications for daily clinical practice remain elusive. High-quality prospective data are urgently warranted to determine whether patients benefit from the application of PET/CT in terms of prognosis. At the moment, the lack of such evidence as well as the absence of standardized imaging methods and biomarkers still precludes PET/CT imaging to be included in the relevant clinical practice guidelines.

scholarly journals Radiological Monitoring of Modern Immunotherapy: A Novel Challenge for Interdisciplinary Patient Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 192 (03) ◽  
pp. 235-245
Author(s):  
Simon Lennartz ◽  
Stefan Diederich ◽  
Christian Doehn ◽  
Bernhard Gebauer ◽  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Therapy Monitoring ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
White Paper ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Clinical Routine ◽  
Frankfurt Am Main ◽  
Oncologic Patients

Background Immunotherapy represents an effective therapeutic approach for many malignant diseases that were previously difficult to treat. However, since immunotherapy can lead to atypical therapy response patterns in the form of pseudo-progression or mixed responses and comprise an altered spectrum of adverse reactions, they present a new challenge for oncologic imaging. Detailed knowledge in this area is essential for oncologic clinical radiologists, since the radiological report is a cornerstone of response assessment, and increasingly influences therapy regimens and coverage by health insurances. Method This white paper is based on an expert meeting in Frankfurt am Main and subsequent discussions between the authors. Based on the iRECIST criteria, it is intended to provide orientation for a response assessment of oncologic patients undergoing immunotherapy that can be applied in the clinical routine. Results Radiological therapy monitoring outside clinical studies is subject to inherent limitations, but should be performed based on iRECIST criteria, according to the opinion of the expert panel. It should be taken into account that immunotherapies can in principle lead to pseudo-progression and autoimmunological side effects. Since radiological follow-up is currently the only method to accurately distinguish real progressive disease from pseudo-progression, clinically stable patients with disease progression under immunotherapy should undergo additional short-term follow-up imaging according to the suspected diagnosis. Biopsy should be used cautiously and predominately in curative settings. Conclusion For response assessment of immunotherapy in clinical studies, the new iRECIST criteria were published in 2017. Outside studies, the application of iRECIST criteria in the clinical routine is subject to several limitations. The recommendations implied in these criteria can, however, be used in conjunction with the current literature as a guideline in clinical practice and outside studies. Key points:  Citation Format

scholarly journals An outline of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and the complement cascade of immune system

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Padmalochan Hembram
Keyword(s):  
Immune System ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Main Body ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Transmission Chain ◽  
The World ◽  
Therapeutic Molecules ◽  
Rapid Transmission ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Near Future

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 19 is a viral infection caused by a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. It was first notified in Wuhan, China, is now spread into numerous part of the world. Thus, the world needs urgent support and encouragement to develop a vaccine or antiviral treatments to combat the atrocious outbreak. Main body of the abstract The origin of this virus is yet unknown; however, rapid transmission from human-to-human “Anthroponosis” has widely confirmed. The world is witnessing a continuous hike in SARS-CoV-2 infection. In light of the outbreak of coronavirus disease 19, we have aimed to highlight the basic and vital information about the novel coronavirus. We provide an overview of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, timeline and its pathophysiological properties which would be an aid for the development of therapeutic molecules and antiviral drugs. Immune system plays a crucial role in virus infection in order to control but may have dark side when becomes uncontrollable. The host and SARS-CoV-2 interaction describe how the virus exploits host machinery and how overactive host immune response can cause disease severity also addressed in this review. Short conclusion Safe and effective vaccines may be the game-changing tools, but in the near future wearing mask, washing hands at regular intervals, avoiding crowed, maintaining physical distancing and hygienic surrounding, must be good practices to reduce and break the transmission chain. Still, research is ongoing not only on how vaccines protect against disease, but also against infection and transmission.

scholarly journals Recent Progress in Dendritic Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2495
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Matsuo ◽  
Osamu Yoshie ◽  
Kosuke Kitahata ◽  
Momo Kamei ◽  
Yuta Hara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Targeted Delivery ◽  
Cancer Vaccines ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Host Immune Responses ◽  
Near Future ◽  
Identification And Characterization

Cancer immunotherapy aims to treat cancer by enhancing cancer-specific host immune responses. Recently, cancer immunotherapy has been attracting much attention because of the successful clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways. However, although highly effective in some patients, immune checkpoint inhibitors are beneficial only in a limited fraction of patients, possibly because of the lack of enough cancer-specific immune cells, especially CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs), in the host. On the other hand, studies on cancer vaccines, especially DC-based ones, have made significant progress in recent years. In particular, the identification and characterization of cross-presenting DCs have greatly advanced the strategy for the development of effective DC-based vaccines. In this review, we first summarize the surface markers and functional properties of the five major DC subsets. We then describe new approaches to induce antigen-specific CTLs by targeted delivery of antigens to cross-presenting DCs. In this context, the chemokine receptor XCR1 and its ligand XCL1, being selectively expressed by cross-presenting DCs and mainly produced by activated CD8+ T cells, respectively, provide highly promising molecular tools for this purpose. In the near future, CTL-inducing DC-based cancer vaccines may provide a new breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy alone or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

scholarly journals Robustness of radiomic features in CT images with different slice thickness, comparing liver tumour and muscle

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Escudero Sanchez ◽  
Leonardo Rundo ◽  
Andrew B. Gill ◽  
Matthew Hoare ◽  
Eva Mendes Serrao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Fraction ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Ct Images ◽  
Optimal Number ◽  
Image Features ◽  
Liver Tumour ◽  
Slice Thickness ◽  
Invasive Method ◽  
Feature Values

AbstractRadiomic image features are becoming a promising non-invasive method to obtain quantitative measurements for tumour classification and therapy response assessment in oncological research. However, despite its increasingly established application, there is a need for standardisation criteria and further validation of feature robustness with respect to imaging acquisition parameters. In this paper, the robustness of radiomic features extracted from computed tomography (CT) images is evaluated for liver tumour and muscle, comparing the values of the features in images reconstructed with two different slice thicknesses of 2.0 mm and 5.0 mm. Novel approaches are presented to address the intrinsic dependencies of texture radiomic features, choosing the optimal number of grey levels and correcting for the dependency on volume. With the optimal values and corrections, feature values are compared across thicknesses to identify reproducible features. Normalisation using muscle regions is also described as an alternative approach. With either method, a large fraction of features (75–90%) was found to be highly robust (< 25% difference). The analyses were performed on a homogeneous CT dataset of 43 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and consistent results were obtained for both tumour and muscle tissue. Finally, recommended guidelines are included for radiomic studies using variable slice thickness.

IMMU-06. COMBINATORIAL IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS FOR TARGETED INTRATUMORAL DELIVERY IN GBM

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi93-vi93
Author(s):  
Stephanie Sanders ◽  
Denise Herpai ◽  
Waldemar Debinski
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Live Cells ◽  
Normal Brain ◽  
Cytotoxic Therapies ◽  
Checkpoint Receptors

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is an immunologically cold tumor. Using single cell sequencing of CD45+ cells we confirmed that T cells are present within GBM samples. These T cells are positive for exhaustion markers such as LAG3 and TIGIT, as well as CTLA4 and PD1 checkpoint receptors. Modulating T cell activity through use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of solid tumors, and the combination of anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 ICIs has shown increased efficacy over use of a single therapeutic. Additionally, targeting ICIs to the tumor cells may increase efficacy of this treatment. We therefore constructed a combinatorial ICI redirected to GBM via interleukin 13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13RA2), a receptor over-expressed on the majority of GBM cells but not normal brain. The first component of the construct, labeled with a histidine tag, targets CTLA4 while the second component, tagged with a StrepII tag, targets PD1. The tags added to the constructs will allow for purification of a combinatorial heterodimer simultaneously targeting PD1, CTLA4 and IL13RA2. We purified individual components via fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) using a proteinG column followed by a HisTrap or StrepTrap column. We obtained a recombinant, targeted multivalent ICI at &gt; 95% purity. We found that these constructs are able to bind their target receptors via ELISA in which the Kd values ranged from picomolar to low nanomolar range. Additionally, our constructs bind their target on live cells by flow cytometry. We next designed a heterodimeric construct which can combinatorially target CTLA4 and PD1 while also directing the ICI therapy to GBM. These constructs in conjunction with other immune stimulants like cytotoxic therapies are intended to facilitate the interaction between T cells and GBM tumor cells directly in a tumor microenvironment.

EXTH-40. MULTIDIMENSIONAL INTERROGATION OF GLIOBLASTOMA MICROENVIRONMENT TREATMENT RESPONSE IN EXPLANT CULTURES

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi172-vi172
Author(s):  
Tala Shekarian ◽  
Ewelina Bartoszek-Kandler ◽  
Carl Zinner ◽  
Christian Schuerch ◽  
Gregor Hutter
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Cellular Composition ◽  
Cytokine Analysis ◽  
Adaptive Immune Cells ◽  
Bioreactor Cultures ◽  
Tumor Center ◽  
Explant Cultures

Abstract The immune tumor microenvironment (iTME) of glioblastoma (GBM) contains microglial, macrophage, other myeloid cell populations and as adaptive immune cells. Recent therapeutic strategies for GBM aim at targeting iTME components to induce antitumoral immunity. A patient-tailored, ex vivo drug testing and response analysis platform would facilitate personalized therapy planning, provide insights into treatment-induced immune mechanisms in the iTME, and enable the discovery of biomarkers of response and resistance. Here, we generated patient-derived, live 3D GBM bioreactors from different tumor regions to assess iTME treatment responses to microglia modulators and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Intact GBM tissue specimens from the tumor center and periphery were cultured for 7 days in the presence or absence of anti-PD1, anti-CD47 antibodies or their combination. Tissues were analyzed by CODEX highly multiplexed microscopy using an immune-centered 54-marker panel, and changes in cytokine and chemokine levels in culture supernatants were investigated. A computational pipeline for integrative therapy response assessment was implemented. Explant cultures from n=8 IDH wt GBM were subjected to this integrative personalized analysis. Tissue integrity after 3D bioreactor cultures was comparable to tissue taken directly after surgery. FFPE CODEX workflow was feasible with adequate staining quality in bioreactor cultures. 850'000 single cells were segmented and clustered. Cellular composition between tumor center and the peripheral invasion zone differed significantly in immune phenotypes, cytokine profile and response to innate, adaptive or combinatorial local immunotherapies. Multiplexed cytokine analysis revealed IFNγ response signatures in a subset of center samples, whereas the peripheral invasion zone displayed a blunted cytokine response. This cytokine signature corresponded to cellular composition shifts within specific cellular neighborhoods. CD4 and CD8 T cells were invigorated and left their vascular niche. Our study demonstrates that local immunotherapies enable an active antitumoral immune response within the tumor center, and provides a multidimensional personalized framework for immunotherapy response assessment.

scholarly journals Proposals for revised IWG 2018 hematological response criteria in patients with MDS included in clinical trials

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (10) ◽  
pp. 1020-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Platzbecker ◽  
P. Fenaux ◽  
L. Adès ◽  
A. Giagounidis ◽  
V. Santini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Response Criteria ◽  
Patient Response ◽  
Erythroid Response ◽  
Clinical Responses

Abstract The heterogeneity of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) has made evaluating patient response to treatment challenging. In 2006, the International Working Group (IWG) proposed a revision to previously published standardized response criteria (IWG 2000) for uniformly evaluating clinical responses in MDSs. These IWG 2006 criteria have been used prospectively in many clinical trials in MDSs, but proved challenging in several of them, especially for the evaluation of erythroid response. In this report, we provide rationale for modifications (IWG 2018) of these recommendations, mainly for “hematological improvement” criteria used for lower-risk MDSs, based on recent practical and reported experience in clinical trials. Most suggestions relate to erythroid response assessment, which are refined in an overall more stringent manner. Two major proposed changes are the differentiation between “procedures” and “criteria” for hematologic improvement–erythroid assessment and a new categorization of transfusion-burden subgroups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document