scholarly journals A randomized, open-label, multicentre, comparative study of therapeutic efficacy, preventive potential and tolerability of BNO 1030 extract, containing Althea root, Chamomile flowers, horsetail herb, walnut leaves, yarrow herb, oak bark, dandelion herb in the treatment of acute non-bacterial tonsillitis in children aged 6 to 18 years

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasyl Popovych ◽  
Ivana Koshel ◽  
Oleksandr Malofiichuk ◽  
Lubov Pyletska ◽  
Oleksandr Semenyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Control Point ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Acute Tonsillitis ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Acute tonsillitis tends to recur. In cases where patients do not meet the Paradise criteria, the possibilities of non-surgical treatment are more often considered. The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy during the long-term follow-up and the effect on the recurrence of the phytoneering extract BNO 1030 (Imupret®) in patients with acute non-bacterial tonsillitis. Methods In this Randomized, Open-Label, Multicentre, Comparative Study, 238 outpatients aged 6–18 years were randomized to receive either BNO 1030 (Imupret®) for 4 weeks in addition to standard symptomatic treatment, or to receive standard treatment. Evaluation criteria: reduction in the symptom severity less than 1 point, the number of tonsillitis recurrences at each control point after 3, 6 and 12 months during the one-year follow-up. Results A significant reduction in the severity of local symptoms and the general condition at each control point within the year of follow-up and a significant decrease (by 66.56%) in the recurrence rate of tonsillitis were noted. The anti-recurrent action was manifested during within the year of follow-up. All patients tolerated phytotherapy well; no adverse reactions were noted. Conclusions BNO 1030 (Imupret®) is a safe and effective medicinal product for acute non-bacterial tonsillitis in children aged 6–18 years. In addition to the main symptomatic treatment, it leads to a significant reduction in the clinical manifestations and the number of recurrences of tonsillitis within the year of follow-up. Trial registration This trial was registered in German Clinical Trials Register retrospectively on June 27, 2018. Trial Acronym: ATi-1 DRKS-ID: DRKS00015020

Rituximab Therapy after Response to R-CHOP Induction Therapy for Patients with Previously Untreated Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL): Clinical Outcomes and Pharmacokinetics (PK)

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1295-1295
Author(s):  
Louis Fehrenbacher ◽  
Jonathan A. Polikoff ◽  
Robert Hermann ◽  
Haresh Jhangiani ◽  
Jean Bjerke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Residual Concentration ◽  
Ann Arbor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Abstract The addition of rituximab (R) therapy significantly improves PFS in patients with relapsedl/refractory disease responding after CHOP as well as responders after R-CHOP induction (van Oers, 2005). The aim of this study was to assess, in patients with previously untreated indolent NHL, the safety, efficacy and PK of additional R therapy in responders to R-CHOP induction. Between 10/01 and 08/06, 102 patients aged 28–84 (mean 57 yr) yrs with Ann Arbor Stage III (28.4%) or IV (71.6%) indolent NHL were treated on this Phase II single-arm, open-label, multi-center, community-based trial. Baseline LDH and β2 microglobulin were above normal in 20.6% and 66.3% of patients, respectively. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles of R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 all IV on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle; prednisone 100 mg/d po Days 1–5; and R 375 mg/m2 IV 2–3 days prior to first dose of CHOP and thereafter on Day 1 of each cycle). Patients with ongoing response (CR/CRu or PR) received R 375 mg/m2 weekly x 4, repeated every 6 months x 2 yrs, for a total of up to 16 R doses, within 28 days after completion of R-CHOP. Median follow-up was 39 mos. ORR after R-CHOP was 86.3% (95% CI: 78.3, 92.1), with CR/CRu 48% (95% CI: 38.0, 58.2). As measured from initiation of R-CHOP, PFS at 2 and 3 yrs was 75.2% (95% CI: 64.0, 83.3) and 67.3% (95% CI: 54.6, 77.2), respectively. OS at 2 and 3 yrs was 92.9% (95% CI: 85.7, 96.6) and 89.4% (95% CI: 81.2, 94.2), respectively. Infusion-related toxicity with R given after R-CHOP was less frequent than seen with R-CHOP in this study. The overall incidence of serious adverse events during R therapy given after R-CHOP was 8.5%, including 3 NCI-CTC grade 3/4 events: viral encephalitis (n=1), patellar fracture (n=1) & development of colon cancer (n=1). Serum R concentrations were collected over serial timepoints from 12 patients. Both pre- and end of infusion serum R concentrations were similar across cycles 2–4 of R therapy given after R-CHOP. R concentration was higher just prior to infusion of the first R dose given after R-CHOP due to residual concentration from the R-CHOP treatment. Concentrations were very low (< 10 ug/mL) just prior to initiation of the subsequent R cycles. During R therapy given after R-CHOP, serum R concentrations were similar to those previously reported during R monotherapy treatment (Berinstein, 1998). In summary, this study demonstrated that R therapy given after R-CHOP to be generally well-tolerated, and associated with 75.2% PFS and 92.9% OS at 2 yrs, and 67.3% PFS and 89.4% OS at 3 yrs. Moreover, the current study demonstrates that PK data from R induction can be extrapolated to R given after R-CHOP. The benefit of adding additional R therapy to responders to R-chemotherapy will be addressed in the analysis of the ongoing Phase III PRIMA study, wherein patients with advanced follicular lymphoma who respond to R-chemotherapy induction are randomized to receive further R therapy vs. observation.

scholarly journals Long-Term Update from the Open-Label Extension of the NEURO-TTR Study in Patients with Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 498-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Brannagan ◽  
Annabel K. Wang ◽  
Teresa Coelho ◽  
Marcia Waddington Cruz ◽  
Michael J. Polydefkis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stage Ii ◽  
Extension Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Transthyretin Amyloidosis ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Duration Of Disease ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (hATTR) is a rare, progressive, and fatal disease caused by the buildup of transthyretin-derived amyloid protein in major organs, predominantly affecting the peripheral nerves and heart. Inotersen, a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide targeting TTR mRNA, has shown efficacy and safety in patients with hATTR in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, NEURO-TTR (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01737398; Benson NEJM 2018). Patients with hATTR amyloidosis who completed the NEURO-TTR study were eligible to receive inotersen for up to 5 years in a phase 3 open-label extension study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02175004). Methods: In NEURO-TTR, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive inotersen (300-mg weekly subcutaneous doses) or placebo. In the open-label extension, patients continued inotersen (inotersen-inotersen) or switched from placebo to inotersen (placebo-inotersen). Evaluations included modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7 neurophysiologic tests composite score (mNIS+7; higher scores indicate worse neuropathy), Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy questionnaire total score (Norfolk QoL-DN; higher scores indicate worse QoL), and adverse events (AEs). Cardiomyopathy (CM) was defined by a diagnosis of hATTR-CM at trial entry or by an interventricular wall thickness of 13 mm or more on transthoracic echocardiography at baseline, as ascertained by a central reader, or no known history of persistent hypertension (systolic blood pressure, ≥150 mm Hg) within 12 months before screening. Results : In the placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 NEURO-TTR study, 112/172 patients were randomized and received inotersen. At baseline, patients were predominantly white (91.9%) males (68.6%) with a mean age of 59.2 years. A total of 67.4% had stage I (ambulatory) and 32.6% had stage II (ambulatory with assistance) disease. Inotersen-treated patients who had stage II disease had a longer duration of disease from diagnosis (40.9 vs 24.8 months, respectively) and from onset (72.6 vs 63.2 months, respectively) of hATTR polyneuropathy symptoms compared with placebo-treated patients who had stage II disease, indicating more advanced disease. A higher proportion of inotersen-treated patients had CM at baseline (67% vs 55%, respectively), and more severe CM, measured by higher NT-proBNP levels and longer duration of disease from hATTR-CM symptom onset, compared with placebo-treated patients. In the phase 3 open-label extension study as of Sept 15, 2017, 134 of 135 patients enrolled received ≥1 dose of inotersen. The mean age was 60.4 years and most patients were male (69.4%). Extended dosing with inotersen up to 27 months continued to improve mNIS+7 and Norfolk QoL-DN in the open-label extension compared to placebo-treated patients at week 66 in the double-blind NEURO-TTR study; mean changes from open-label extension baseline to open-label extension week 52 in the inotersen-inotersen group were 5.1 points for mNIS+7 (vs 25.5 for placebo-treated patients in the double-blind NEURO-TTR study) and 3.9 points for Norfolk QoL-DN (vs 10.7 for placebo-treated patients in the double-blind NEURO-TTR study). Initiation of inotersen in placebo-treated patients (placebo-inotersen) resulted in improvement in mNIS+7 and Norfolk QoL-DN by week 26. Few patients discontinued treatment because of AEs (inotersen-inotersen, 9%; placebo-inotersen, 4%). The rate of treatment-related serious AEs was low in both treatment groups (2% each). There was no evidence of increased risk for grade 4 thrombocytopenia or severe renal events with increased duration of exposure. We will present 2-year follow-up results from the open-label extension study. Conclusions: Results of the open-label extension show continued benefit, measured by mNIS+7 and Norfolk QoL-DN, and confirmed that earlier initiation of treatment is important for optimal clinical outcomes. No new safety concerns were identified. Results from the longer-term follow-up for the open-label extension will further elucidate how inotersen may benefit patients with hATTR amyloidosis. Disclosures Brannagan: Alnylam: Honoraria, Other: Investigator, Speakers Bureau; Ionis: Other: Investigator. Wang:Ionis: Other: Investigator, Speakers Bureau. Coelho:Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ionis: Consultancy, Other: Investigator; Alnylam: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Investigator; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Investigator. Waddington Cruz:Ionis: Honoraria; Genzyme/Sanofi: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Polydefkis:Pfizer: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria. Dyck:Ionis: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy. Plante-Bordeneuve:Alnylam: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: reimbursement for travel and meeting; Ionis: Other: reimbursement for travel and meeting. Berk:Ionis: Honoraria, Other: Investigator; Alnylam: Honoraria, Other: Investigator; Pfizer: Other: Investigator. Barroso:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Thaos registry, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Honoraria, Other: Investigator. Conceição:Alnylam: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hughes:Ionis: Employment. Kwoh:Ionis: Employment. Jung:Ionis: Employment. Guthrie:Akcea: Employment. Pollock:Akcea: Employment. Benson:Ionis: Other: Investigator, Research Funding. Gertz:janssen: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; Ionis: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; annexon: Consultancy; Prothena: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study of Therapeutic Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of BNO 1030 application in the technology of delayed prescription of antibiotics in patients with severe acute tonsillitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Popovych ◽  
I. V. Koshel ◽  
O. N. Malofiichuk ◽  
L. I. Pyletska ◽  
O. A. Semeniuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Medicinal Product ◽  
Sore Throat ◽  
Antibiotic Prescription ◽  
Therapeutic Benefit ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Acute Tonsillitis ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Delayed Antibiotic Prescription

AbstractAcute bacterial tonsillitis occurs in 20 –30 % of immunocompetent children; however, the frequency of antibacterial drug prescriptions reaches up to 90 %. Delayed antibiotic prescription is recommended by current guidelines. The study objective was to determine the efficacy of phytoneering extract BNO 1030 in the technology of delayed antibiotic prescription in patients with severe acute tonsillitis.MethodsIn the multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 182 out of 200 randomized children with acute tonsillitis aged 6 –12 years completed the study. Evaluation criteria: a reduced severity of sore throat when swallowing and at rest, throat irritation at rest, hyperemia of the tonsils assessed by a physician according to a 4-point scale at each visit compared to Visit 1, dynamics of self-assessment of general well-being, intensity of sore throat and difficulty swallowing according to a 10-point visual analogue scale, frequency of antibiotic prescriptions, therapeutic benefit from BNO 1030 in days.ResultsThe use of phytotherapeutic medicinal product BNO 1030 in addition to the standard symptomatic treatment of severe acute tonsillitis provides a clinically significant, adequate reduction in the symptom severity assessed by a physician at V2 (p < 0.005). There are significant differences in the patient’s self-assessment of the symptoms from treatment Day 2 (p < 0.005). This allows to significantly reduce the duration of systemic antipyretic administration (p < 0.005). In the first days of treatment, when a decision on delay of antibiotic prescription is made, a therapeutic benefit in two days in patients of the treatment group was observed compared to the control group. The use of BNO 1030 in patients with severe acute tonsillitis significantly reduces, by 43.7 % or 2.3 times, the need for prescribing antibiotic therapy as part of the technology of delayed antibiotic prescription (p < 0.005). During treatment, no side effects and complications of the disease were recorded.ConclusionBNO 1030 is a safe and effective medicinal product for the treatment of severe acute tonsillitis in children aged 6 –12 years. It provides a significant therapeutic benefit when administered in addition to standard symptomatic therapy and reduces the irrational antibiotic prescription.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04537819https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04537819?term=ATi-2&draw=2&rank=1

Phase I evaluation of vandetanib with radiation therapy (RT) ± cisplatin in previously untreated advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6016-6016 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Papadimitrakopoulou ◽  
S. J. Frank ◽  
G. R. Blumenschein ◽  
C. Chen ◽  
M. Kane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
To Receive

6016 Background: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral anticancer agent that selectively targets VEGF, EGF and RET receptor tyrosine kinases. We report preliminary results from an ongoing open-label phase I study of vandetanib with RT ± cisplatin in patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresected, locally advanced (stage III-IV) HNSCC. Methods: Eligible pts received once-daily vandetanib for 14 days followed by either 1) concomitant vandetanib + RT (2 Gy/d, 5 d/wk; total 70 Gy) + cisplatin (30 mg/m2, 2 h iv infusion/wk) for 7 wks, or 2) concomitant vandetanib + RT (2.2 Gy/d accelerated fractionation, 5 d/wk; total 66 Gy) for 6 wks. The primary objective was to determine the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vandetanib in both regimens. The first pt cohort received vandetanib 100 mg/day; escalation to 200 mg and 300 mg in subsequent cohorts was permitted providing <2/6 (33%) pts in the preceding cohort experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Cohort expansion at the MTD of vandetanib was also planned. Results: As of Dec 1 2008, 24 pts (median age 53.5 yrs; 19 male; all M0) had received treatment with vandetanib + RT + cisplatin (n=18) or vandetanib + RT (n=6). In the triplet arm, no DLTs occurred in the initial vandetanib 100 mg cohort (n=6); an additional 6 pts were enrolled to receive vandetanib 200 mg but this dose was considered to exceed the MTD since DLTs were reported in 3/5 evaluable pts (Table). Vandetanib 100 mg was therefore declared the MTD with RT + cisplatin and cohort expansion at this dose continues. In regimen 2), 6 pts have received vandetanib 100 mg + RT and evaluation of this initial cohort is ongoing. Conclusions: This study, which continues to recruit, is the first to evaluate dual targeting of VEGFR/EGFR tyrosine kinases with chemoradiation or radiation alone in HNSCC pts. Among the 24 treated pts, 2 have completed the 2-year follow up, 1 death occurred that was causally related to cisplatin, and 21 remain in follow up or continue to receive treatment. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

A randomized phase II/III study of naptumomab estafenatox plus IFN-α versus IFN-α in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3073-3073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Hawkins ◽  
Martin Eric Gore ◽  
Yaroslav Shparyk ◽  
Vladimir Bondar ◽  
Oleg Gladkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
To Receive

3073 Background: Naptumomab estafenatox/ANYARA (Nap) is a fusion protein of an antibody (5T4) and a superantigen (SEA/E-120). After phase I studies (Borghaei. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27:4116) a prospective, randomized phase II/III trial of Nap + IFN-α (A) vs IFN-α (I) was conducted. Methods: Patients (pts) with RCC were randomized in an open label study to receive A or I. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were PFS, response rate and safety. Baseline (bl) plasma IL-6 was predictive of pazopanib (Tran. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13:827) and MVA-5T4 vaccine (Harrop. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012, 61:2283) benefit in RCC pts. IL-6 and anti-SEA/E-120 antibodies (a-S) were analyzed. A subgroup SG1 had bl levels below median for IL-6 (<7 pg/ml) and a-S. Another subgroup SG2 had IL-6 below 13 pg/ml (Tran. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13:827) and excluding upper quartile of a-S according to phase 1 levels (Borghaei. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27:4116). Results: From 5/2007 to 10/2010 513 pts were treated (ITT) with a median follow-up time for censored pts of 43 months. Unexpectedly, pts in certain territories had increased bl a-S (median of 61 pmol/ml in Russia vs 34 in UK). The table summarizes efficacy results. The primary endpoint was not met. Multivariate analysis adjusted for risk scores and subsequent TKI usage verified Nap benefit in pts with low IL-6 and normal a-S. Nap was well tolerated. Pyrexia (A:46%/I:18%), nausea (21%/11%), back pain (18%/6%), vomiting (16%/7%) and chills (12%/4%) were more common after Nap. Conclusions: The study did not meet primary endpoint. In pts with low IL-6 and normal levels of a-S, addition of Nap to IFN-α improves OS and PFS. The results warrant further studies with Nap in sequence or combo with e.g. TKIs in this subgroup. More generally, as bl IL-6 appears to be prognostic and predictive of outcome on treatment with TKIs and immunotherapies this may be a stratification factor for RCC studies. Clinical trial information: NCT00420888. [Table: see text]

Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Fluconazole Compared with a 7-Day Regimen of Itraconazole in the Treatment of AIDS-Related Oropharyngeal Candidiasis

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
S De Wit ◽  
E O'Doherty ◽  
C De Vroey ◽  
N Clumeck
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Immune Deficiency Syndrome ◽  
Deficiency Syndrome ◽  
Oropharyngeal Candidiasis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Lower Response Rate ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Concomitant Medications ◽  
To Receive

The primary aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of single-dose fluconazole and a 7-day regimen of itraconazole for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus (HlV)-positive patients. In this open-label trial, 40 HIV-positive patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis were randomized to receive either one dose of fluconazole 150 mg or seven daily doses of itraconazole 100 mg. Clinical condition was assessed at baseline, day 8, and day 30 (follow-up). In the fluconazole group, 15 of 20 (75%) patients were clinically cured on day 8, three (15%) were clinically improved, and two (10%) were treatment failures. At follow-up, six (30%) patients experienced relapse. In the itraconazole group, four of 17 (24%) patients were clinically cured at 8 days, and two (12%) were clinically improved; two patients relapsed by day 30. Ten (50%) patients in the itraconazole group were taking concomitant medications that could potentially affect the bioavailability of itraconazole. After excluding the results from these patients, clinical response rates remained significantly higher in the fluconazole treatment arm. These results suggest that a single 150-mg dose of fluconazole may be a safe, effective, and convenient therapy for acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related oropharyngeal candidiasis. The lower response rate in the patients who received itraconazole 100 mg daily for 7 days could be explained by drug interactions and the unpredictable absorption of itraconazole.

Serotonin Syndrome Induced by Low-Dose Venlafaxine

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Jhy Pan ◽  
Winston W Shen
Keyword(s):  
Serotonin Syndrome ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Probability Scale ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Pharmacodynamic Interaction ◽  
Case Summary ◽  
Taiwanese Woman ◽  
To Receive

OBJECTIVE: To report the case of a patient with serotonin syndrome induced by low-dose venlafaxine. CASE SUMMARY: A 29-year-old Taiwanese woman with major depressive disorder abruptly developed serotonin syndrome during low-dose (37.5 mg/d) venlafaxine monotherapy, with symptoms of restlessness, tremor, shivering, diarrhea, vomiting, ataxia, tachycardia, and myoclonus. The patient recovered in 2 hours after receiving prochlorperazine and lorazepam in the emergency department. Venlafaxine was discontinued, and she was discharged home. Two weeks later, the patient started to receive fluoxetine 20 mg/d and reported no adverse adverse effects during follow-up clinic visits. DISCUSSION: The clinical manifestations of this case meet Sternbach's criteria of serotonin syndrome. Its possible etiologic factors include panic attack, adverse drug reaction, pharmacodynamic interaction, and congenital absence of CYP2D6 enzyme activity. The Naranjo probability scale suggested a probable causality of venlafaxine treatment and serotonin syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the risk of serotonin syndrome when the patient receives not only a combination of 2 antidepressants, but also the single potent serotonergic agent venlafaxine.

scholarly journals A Phase 2 Study of Camrelizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Two-Year Outcomes and Continued Treatment beyond First RECIST-Defined Progression

Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Zhenggang Ren ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Zhiqiang Meng ◽  
Zhendong Chen ◽  
Xiaoli Chai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Phase 2 Study

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> In a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, phase 2 study for pretreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), camrelizumab showed potent antitumor activity and acceptable safety profile. The aim of this report was to provide long-term data and evaluate potential benefit of treatment with camrelizumab beyond progression. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From November 15, 2016, to November 16, 2017, 217 patients received camrelizumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 or 3 weeks. Treatment beyond first Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-defined progression (TBP) with camrelizumab was allowed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> At data cutoff of December 16, 2019 (&#x3e;2 years after the last patient enrollment; median duration of follow-up, 13.2 months [IQR 5.7–25.8]), 14 (43.8%) of the 32 responses per blinded independent central review were ongoing. The median duration of response was not reached (range 2.5–30.5 + months). The ongoing response rates at 12, 18, and 24 months were 68.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.7–82.2), 59.8% (95% CI 38.8–75.6), and 53.1% (95% CI 31.0–71.0), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months (95% CI 11.5–16.3). The 18- and 24-month OS rates were 41.3% (95% CI 34.6–47.9) and 33.7% (95% CI 27.3–40.2), respectively. Of the 172 patients who experienced RECIST-defined progression per investigator, 102 received TBP, while 70 did not (non-TBP). The median OS was 16.9 months (95% CI 13.3–22.6) in the TBP group versus 9.4 months (95% CI 5.8–14.8) in the non-TBP group, and the 18- and 24-month OS rates were 47.5% (95% CI 37.3–56.9) versus 33.1% (95% CI 22.3–44.3) and 38.8% (95% CI 29.2–48.4) versus 23.2% (95% CI 13.8–34.1), respectively. No new safety signals of camrelizumab were observed. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> With prolonged follow-up, camrelizumab continues to demonstrate the durable response and long survival in pretreated advanced HCC patients with manageable toxicities, especially in those who continued the treatment beyond first RECIST-defined progression.

scholarly journals FRI0487 APREMILAST IN MONOTHERAPY OR COMBINED IN NON-ULCER MANIFESTATIONS OF BEHÇET’S DISEASE. NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 34 REFRACTORY CASES OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 841.1-842
Author(s):  
A. Herrero Morant ◽  
B. Atienza Mateo ◽  
J. Loricera ◽  
V. Calvo del Rio ◽  
J. L. Martín-Varillas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Dose ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Biologic Dmards ◽  
Aphthous Ulcers ◽  
Musculoskeletal Manifestations ◽  
Del Rio

Background:Apremilast (APR) has demonstrated efficacy in orogenital ulcers of Behçet´s disease (BD). Response of other clinical manifestations remains unknown.Objectives:To assess the efficacy and safety of APR in monotherapy or combined with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in non-aphthous ulcers of BD.Methods:National multicenter open-label study on 34 BD patients treated with APR at maintained standard dose of 30 mg twice daily.Results:From a cohort of 51 patients with APR by refractory orogenital ulcers of BD, we selected 34 (24 women/10 men, mean age 43.8±14.3 years), cases with another clinical manifestation/s.Excluding CTs, colchicine or NSAIDs, APR was given in monotherapy (n=21) or combined with conventional and/or biologic DMARDs in 13 cases (5 methotrexate, 3 azathioprine, 3 hydroxychloroquine, 1 sulfasalazine, 1 dapsone, 2 tocilizumab, 1 IFX). Other active manifestations present at APR onset were: arthralgia/arthritis (16, true arthritis in 5), folliculitis/pseudofolliculitis (14), erythema nodosum (3), furunculosis (2), paradoxical psoriasis by TNFi (2), intestinal ileitis (2), deep venous thrombosis (2), leg ulcers (1), erythematosus and scaly skin lesions (1), fever (1), unilateral anterior uveitis (1) and neurobehçet (1).After a median follow-up of 6 [3-12] months, folliculitis and ileitis improved, neurobehçet remained stable and musculoskeletal manifestations evolved in a variable way.(TABLE)TABLE.Conclusion:In addition of orogenital ulcers, APR in monotherapy or combined, seems to be useful in skin manifestations of BDDisclosure of Interests:Alba Herrero Morant: None declared, Belen Atienza Mateo: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Vanesa Calvo del Rio Grant/research support from: MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen and Celgene, Speakers bureau: Pfizer and Lilly, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Jenaro Graña: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Manuel Martín Martínez: None declared, Elvira Diez: None declared, María Dolores García-Armario: None declared, Esperanza Martínez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Patricia Moya Alvarado: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Jaime Calvo Grant/research support from: Lilly, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Jansen, Celgene, Isabel de la Morena: None declared, Francisco Ortiz Sanjuán: None declared, José Andrés Román Ivorra: None declared, Ana Pérez Gómez: None declared, Alejandro Olive: None declared, Carolina Díez: None declared, Juan José Alegre: None declared, D Ybáñez-García Speakers bureau: Lilly, Roche, Sanofi, Ángels Martínez-Ferrer: None declared, Javier Narvaez: None declared, Ignasi Figueras: None declared, Ana Isabel Turrión: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Pilar Trénor: None declared, Soledad Ojeda Speakers bureau: AMGEN, LILLY, GEBRO, Miguel Á. González-Gay Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document