scholarly journals Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Kessler Distress Scale (K10): an application of the rating scale model

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evandro Morais Peixoto ◽  
Daniela Sacramento Zanini ◽  
Josemberg Moura de Andrade
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Clinical Population ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
General Factor ◽  
Measurement Models ◽  
Distress Scale ◽  
Rating Scale Model

Abstract Background The Kessler Distress Scale (K10) is a self-report scale for the assessment of non-specific psychological distress in the general and clinical population. Because of its ease of application and good psychometric properties, the K10 has been adapted to several cultures. The present study seeks to adapt the K10 to Brazilian Portuguese and estimate its validity evidence and reliability. Methods A total of 1914 individuals from the general population participated in the study (age = 34.88, SD = 13.61, 77.7% female). The adjustment indices were compared among three different measurement models proposed for the K10 through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The items’ properties were analyzed by Andrich’s Rating Scale Model (RSM). Furthermore, evidence based on relations to other variables (depression, stress, anxiety, positive and negative affects, and satisfaction with life) was estimated. Results CFA indicated the adequacy of the bifactor model (CFI= 0.985; TLI= 0.973; SMR= 0.019; RMSEA= 0.050), composed of two specific factors (depression and anxiety) and one general factor (psychological distress), corresponding to the theoretical hypothesis. Additionally, it was observed multiple-group invariance by gender and age range. The RSM provided an understanding of the organization of the continuum represented by the psychological distress construct (items difficulty), which varied from −0.89 to 1.00; good adjustment indexes; infit between 0.67 and 1.32; outfit between 0.68 and 1.34; and desirable reliability, α= 0.87. Lastly, theoretically coherent associations with the external variables were observed. Conclusions It is concluded that the Brazilian version of the K10 is a suitable measure of psychological distress for the Brazilian population.

Using the Rating Scale Model to Examine the Psychometric Properties of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Driver Competence

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Sundström
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Measurement Precision ◽  
The Self ◽  
Test Theory ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Two Samples

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a self-report scale for assessing perceived driver competence, labeled the Self-Efficacy Scale for Driver Competence (SSDC), using item response theory analyses. Two samples of Swedish driving-license examinees (n = 795; n = 714) completed two versions of the SSDC that were parallel in content. Prior work, using classical test theory analyses, has provided support for the validity and reliability of scores from the SSDC. This study investigated the measurement precision, item hierarchy, and differential functioning for males and females of the items in the SSDC as well as how the rating scale functions. The results confirmed the previous findings; that the SSDC demonstrates sound psychometric properties. In addition, the findings showed that measurement precision could be increased by adding items that tap higher self-efficacy levels. Moreover, the rating scale can be improved by reducing the number of categories or by providing each category with a label.

An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Behavior Change Strategies for Healthy Eating Scale

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Royal ◽  
Rachael A. Royal
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Change ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Validity Evidence ◽  
Change Strategies ◽  
Allied Health Professions ◽  
Rasch Rating Scale Model ◽  
Rating Scale Model

Background and Purpose: The Behavior Change Strategies for Healthy Eating Scale (BCSHES) has potentially broad implications for use by researchers, practitioners, and educators across various medical and allied health professions. To date, however, the psychometric properties of the BCSHES have not been rigorously evaluated, potentially limiting its use. The purpose of this study was to thoroughly evaluate the psychometric properties of the BCSHES. Methods: The Rasch Rating Scale Model was used to analyze BCSHES data on a sample of 191 graduate/professional program students. Results: Messick’s framework for construct validity was used to discern validity evidence, which noted the BCSHES possessed very strong psychometric properties and is capable of yielding valid and reliable scores. Conclusions: Use of the scale is encouraged, where appropriate.

scholarly journals An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Advising Survey for Medical and Professional Program Students

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Royal ◽  
Liara M. Gonzalez
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Professional Programs ◽  
Rasch Rating Scale Model ◽  
And Behaviors ◽  
Rating Scale Model

<p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a newly developed instrument intended to measure faculty competence as it pertains to their role as advisors, particularly in medical and professional programs. A total of 166 students completed the Faculty Advisor’s Skills and Behaviors Inventory (FASBI). The psychometric properties of the FASBI were evaluated using the Rasch Rating Scale Model. Results indicate the FASBI is a psychometrically-sound instrument capable of producing valid and reproducible measures.</p>

scholarly journals Psychometric properties of the Subjective Well-Being Scale using the Rating Scale Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-63
Author(s):  
Lucas de Francisco CARVALHO ◽  
Cristian ZANON ◽  
Rodolfo Augusto Matteo AMBIEL ◽  
Carla Fernanda FERREIRA-RODRIGUES
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Item Response ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Female College Students ◽  
Subjective Well Being ◽  
Psychometric Quality ◽  
Rating Scale Model ◽  
Do So

Abstract Positive Psychology has gained momentum in the international scenario, and one of its first constructs that has been studied in Brazil is subjective well-being. This study aims to verify the Escala de Bem-Estar Subjetivo (Subjective Well-Being Scale) Scale’s psychometric properties by independently applying the Item Response Theory’s rating scale model to each scale component. Evidence of validity was verified based on internal structure and reliability coefficients, which were assessed through internal consistency. In order to do so, a subject database consisting of 182 male and female college students aged between 18 and 57 years old was used (mean age of 24.6 years). Results showed evidence of unidimensionality of all three factors of the scale. In addition, only one of the factors’ response category did not have the expected results. Participants tended to choose mostly Positive Affect items, and negative affect had the lowest theta average. The implications of these findings to the instrument’s psychometric quality are thoroughly discussed.

scholarly journals Psychometric Properties of the Inventário Dimensional Clínico da Personalidade (IDCP) using the Rating Scale Model

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas de Francisco Carvalho LDF ◽  
◽  
Ricardo Primi R ◽  
Gregory E. Stone GE ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Rating Scale Model

Crisis Occurrence and Resolution in Patients with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness

Crisis ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 160-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. Links ◽  
Rahel Eynan ◽  
Jeffrey S. Ball ◽  
Aiala Barr ◽  
Sean Rourke
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Suicide Ideation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Psychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Persistent Mental Illness ◽  
Crisis Events ◽  
Symptom Distress Scale ◽  
Distress Scale

Abstract. Assertive community treatment appears to have limited impact on the risk of suicide in persons with severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI). This exploratory prospective study attempts to understand this observation by studying the contribution of suicidality to the occurrence of crisis events in patients with SPMI. Specifically, an observer-rated measure of the need for hospitalization, the Crisis Triage Rating Scale, was completed at baseline, crisis occurrence, and resolution to determine how much the level of suicidality contributed to the deemed level of crisis. Second, observer-ratings of suicidal ideation, the Modified Scale for Suicide Ideation, and psychopathology and suicidality, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, were measured at baseline, crisis occurrence, and resolution. A self-report measure of distress, the Symptom Distress Scale, was completed at baseline, crisis occurrence, and resolution. Finally, the patients' crisis experiences were recorded qualitatively to compare with quantitative measures of suicidality. Almost 40% of the subjects experienced crisis events and more than a quarter of these events were judged to be severe enough to warrant the need for hospitalization. Our findings suggest that elevation of psychiatric symptoms is a major contributor to the crisis occurrences of individuals with SPMI; although the risk of suicide may have to be conceived as somewhat separate from crisis occurrence.

An IRT Investigation of the Validity of Non-Patient Analogue Research Using the Beck Depression Inventory

1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Hammond
Keyword(s):  
Differential Item Functioning ◽  
Beck Depression Inventory ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Latent Trait ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Item Functioning ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Analogue Research ◽  
Rating Scale Model

This paper presents an IRT analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory which was carried out to assess the assumption of an underlying latent trait common to non-clinical and patient samples. A one parameter rating scale model was fitted to data drawn from a patient and non-patient sample. Findings suggest that while the BDI fits the model reasonably well for the two samples separately there is sufficient differential item functioning to raise serious duobts of the viability of using it analogously with patient and non-patient groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document