Scalar reverse‐time depth migration of prestack elastic seismic data

Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 1519-1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Sun ◽  
George A. McMechan

Reflected P‐to‐P and P‐to‐S converted seismic waves in a two‐component elastic common‐source gather generated with a P‐wave source in a two‐dimensional model can be imaged by two independent scalar reverse‐time depth migrations. The inputs to migration are pure P‐ and S‐waves that are extracted by divergence and curl calculations during (shallow) extrapolation of the elastic data recorded at the earth’s surface. For both P‐to‐P and P‐to‐S converted reflected waves, the imaging time at each point is the P‐wave traveltime from the source to that point. The extracted P‐wave is reverse‐time extrapolated and imaged with a P‐velocity model, using a finite difference solution of the scalar wave equation. The extracted S‐wave is reverse‐time extrapolated and imaged similarly, but with an S‐velocity model. Converted S‐wave data requires a polarity correction prior to migration to ensure constructive interference between data from adjacent sources. Synthetic examples show that the algorithm gives satisfactory results for laterally inhomogeneous models.

Geophysics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. WB135-WB149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qunshan Zhang ◽  
George A. McMechan

We have developed an alternative (new) method to produce common-image gathers in the incident-angle domain by calculating wavenumbers directly from the P-wave polarization rather than using the dominant wavenumber as the normal to the source wavefront. In isotropic acoustic media, the wave propagation direction can be directly calculated as the spatial gradient direction of the acoustic wavefield, which is parallel to the wavenumber direction (the normal to the wavefront). Instantaneous wavenumber, obtained via a novel Hilbert transform approach, is used to calculate the local normal to the reflectors in the migrated image. The local incident angle is produced as the difference between the propagation direction and the normal to the reflector. By reordering the migrated images (over all common-source gathers) with incident angle, common-image gathers are produced in the incident-angle domain. Instantaneous wavenumber takes the place of the normal to the reflector in the migrated image. P- and S-wave separations allow both PP and PS common-image gathers to be calculated in the angle domain. Unlike the space-shift image condition for calculating the common-image gather in angle domain, we use the crosscorrelation image condition, which is substantially more efficient. This is a direct method, and is less dependent on the data quality than the space-shift method. The concepts were successfully implemented and tested with 2D synthetic acoustic and elastic examples, including a complicated (Marmousi2) model that illustrates effects of multipathing in angle-domain common-image gathers.


Geophysics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. S157-S164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Sun ◽  
George A. McMechan

We have extended prestack parsimonious Kirchhoff depth migration for 2D, two-component, reflected elastic seismic data for a P-wave source recorded at the earth’s surface. First, we separated the P-to-P reflected (PP-) waves and P-to-S converted (PS-) waves in an elastic common-source gather into P-wave and S-wave seismograms. Next, we estimated source-ray parameters (source p values) and receiver-ray parameters (receiver p values) for the peaks and troughs above a threshold amplitude in separated P- and S-wavefields. For each PP and PS reflection, we traced (1) a source ray in the P-velocity model in the direction of the emitted ray angle (determined by the source p value) and (2) a receiver ray in the P- or S-velocity model back in the direction of the emergent PP- or PS-wave ray angle (determined by the PP- or PS-wave receiver p value), respectively. The image-point position was adjusted from the intersection of the source and receiver rays to the point where the sum of the source time and receiver-ray time equaled the two-way traveltime. The orientation of the reflector surface was determined to satisfy Snell’s law at the intersection point. The amplitude of a P-wave (or an S-wave) was distributed over the first Fresnel zone along the reflector surface in the P- (or S-) image. Stacking over all P-images of the PP-wave common-source gathers gave the stacked P-image, and stacking over all S-images of the PS-wave common-source gathers gave the stacked S-image. Synthetic examples showed acceptable migration quality; however, the images were less complete than those produced by scalar reverse-time migration (RTM). The computing time for the 2D examples used was about 1/30 of that for scalar RTM of the same data.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Watremez ◽  
Sylvie Leroy ◽  
Elia d'Acremont ◽  
Stéphane Rouzo

<p>The Gulf of Aden is a young and active oceanic basin, which separates the south-eastern margin of the Arabian Plate from the Somali Plate. The rifting leading to the formation of the north-eastern Gulf of Aden passive margin started ca. 34 Ma ago when the oceanic spreading in this area initiated at least 17.6 Ma ago. The opening direction (N26°E) is oblique to the mean orientation of the Gulf (N75°E), leading to a strong structural segmentation.</p><p>The Encens cruise (2006) allowed for the acquisition of a large seismic refraction dataset with profiles across (6 lines) and along (3 lines) the margin, between the Alula-Fartak and Socotra-Hadbeen fracture zones, which define a first order segment of the Gulf. P-wave velocity modelling already allowed us to image the crustal thinning and the structures, from continental to oceanic domains, along some of the profiles. A lower crustal intermediate body is observed in the Ashawq-Salalah segment, at the base of the transitional and oceanic crusts. The nature of this intermediate body is most probably mafic, linked to a post-rift thermal anomaly. The thin (1-2 km) sediment layer in the study area allows for a clear conversion of P-waves to S-waves at the top basement. Thus, most seismic refraction records show very clear S-wave arrivals.</p><p>In this study, we use both P-wave and S-wave arrivals to delineate the crustal structures and segmentation along and across the margin and add insight into the nature of the rocks below the acoustic basement. P-wave velocity modelling allows for the delineation of the structure variations across and along the margin. The velocity models are used as a base for the S-wave modelling, through the definition of Poisson’s ratios in the different areas of the models. Picking and modelling of S-wave arrivals allow us to identify two families of converted waves: (1) seismic waves converted at the basement interface on the way up, just before arriving to the OBS and (2) seismic waves converted at the basement on the way down, which travelled into the deep structures as S-waves. The first set of arrivals allows for the estimation the S-wave velocities (Poisson’s ratio) in the sediments, showing that the sediments in this area are unconsolidated and water saturated. The second set of arrivals gives us constraints on the S-wave velocities below the acoustic basement. This allows for an improved mapping of the transitional and oceanic domains and the confirmation of the mafic nature of the lower crustal intermediate body.</p>


1966 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-221
Author(s):  
Shuzo Asano

abstract The effect of a corrugated interface on wave propagation is considered by using the method that was first applied to acoustical gratings by Rayleigh. The problem is what happens when a plane P wave is incident on a corrugated interface that separates two semi-infinite media. As is well known, there are irregular (scattered) waves as well as regular waves. By assuming both the amplitude and the slope of a corrugated interface to be small, quantities of the order of the square of corrugation amplitude are taken into account. In the case of normal incidence for three models considered, the effect of corrugation on reflection is larger than the effect of corrugation on refraction; the amplitude of the regularly reflected waves decreases, and that of the regularly refracted waves and of the irregular waves increases, as the corrugation amplitude becomes larger. Generally, the larger the velocity contrast, the larger the variation of wave amplitude with the wavelength and the amplitude of corrugation. The S wave component generally becomes larger as the wavelength of corrugation becomes smaller. Boundary waves exist, depending upon the ratio of wavelength of corrugation to that of the incident wave. For a specified interface, it is possible that there is a significant difference in wave amplitude as a function of the elastic constants. In the case of oblique incidence, computation was carried out for angles of incidence smaller than 15° for one model. For these small angles of incidence, almost all results for the case of normal incidence still hold. Furthermore, it can be concluded that the effect of the angle of incidence on reflected S waves is larger than for the other waves and that large differences in the amplitudes of waves at different angles of incidence may be expected for the irregular waves.


Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. R235-R250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiming Ren ◽  
Zhenchun Li ◽  
Bingluo Gu

Full-waveform inversion (FWI) has the potential to obtain an accurate velocity model. Nevertheless, it depends strongly on the low-frequency data and the initial model. When the starting model is far from the real model, FWI tends to converge to a local minimum. Based on a scale separation of the model (into the background model and reflectivity model), reflection waveform inversion (RWI) can separate out the tomography term in the conventional FWI kernel and invert for the long-wavelength components of the velocity model by smearing the reflected wave residuals along the transmission (or “rabbit-ear”) paths. We have developed a new elastic RWI method to build the P- and S-wave velocity macromodels. Our method exploits a traveltime-based misfit function to highlight the contribution of tomography terms in the sensitivity kernels and a sensitivity kernel decomposition scheme based on the P- and S-wave separation to suppress the high-wavenumber artifacts caused by the crosstalk of different wave modes. Numerical examples reveal that the gradients of the background models become sufficiently smooth owing to the decomposition of sensitivity kernels and the traveltime-based misfit function. We implement our elastic RWI in an alternating way. At each loop, the reflectivity model is generated by elastic least-squares reverse time migration, and then the background model is updated using the separated traveltime kernels. Our RWI method has been successfully applied in synthetic and real reflection seismic data. Inversion results demonstrate that the proposed method can retrieve preferable low-wavenumber components of the P- and S-wave velocity models, which are reliable to serve as a starting model for conventional elastic FWI. Also, our method with a two-stage inversion workflow, first updating the P-wave velocity using the PP kernels and then updating the S-wave velocity using the PS kernels, is feasible and robust even when P- and S-wave velocities have different structures.


Geophysics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. S103-S113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Sun ◽  
George A. McMechan ◽  
Han-Hsiang Chuang

The reflected P- and S-waves in elastic displacement component data recorded at the earth’s surface are separated by reverse-time (downward) extrapolation of the data in an elastic computational model, followed by calculations to give divergence (dilatation) and curl (rotation) at a selected reference depth. The surface data are then reconstructed by separate forward-time (upward) scalar extrapolations, from the reference depth, of the magnitude of the divergence and curl wavefields, and extraction of the separated P- and S-waves, respectively, at the top of the models. A P-wave amplitude will change by a factor that is inversely proportional to the P-velocity when it is transformed from displacement to divergence, and an S-wave amplitude will change by a factor that is inversely proportional to the S-velocity when it is transformed from displacement to curl. Consequently, the ratio of the P- to the S-wave amplitude (the P-S amplitude ratio) in the form of divergence and curl (postseparation) is different from that in the (preseparation) displacement form. This distortion can be eliminated by multiplying the separated S-wave (curl) by a relative balancing factor (which is the S- to P-velocity ratio); thus, the postseparation P-S amplitude ratio can be returned to that in the preseparation data. The absolute P- and S-wave amplitudes are also recoverable by multiplying them by a factor that depends on frequency, on the P-velocity α, and on the unit of α and is location-dependent if the near-surface P-velocity is not constant.


Geophysics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. S177-S184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Sun ◽  
George A. McMechan

We evaluate the physical validity of surface boundary conditions of the computational model in reverse-time extrapolation of 3D, three-component (3-C) elastic seismic data acquired at the earth’s free surface by using mathematical derivations and numerical simulations. Reverse-time extrapolation of elastic data assumes that only the incident P- or S-waves are reconstructed during extrapolation into the computational grid. However, superposition of the (upgoing) incident waves and the (downgoing) reflected and converted waves generated at the free surface also is recorded in data acquisition and is input into reverse-time extrapolation. In elastic reverse-time extrapolation, the computational model needs to have an absorbing top boundary. When the 3D, 3-C elastic data are inserted into the computational model during reverse-time extrapolation, the originally incident P- or S-wave is reconstructed. In addition, the free-surface P-to-P reflected and P-to-S converted waves recombine to reconstruct a second incident P-wave, and the free-surface S-to-S reflected and S-to-P converted waves recombine to reconstruct a second incident S-wave. Therefore, 3D elastic reverse-time extrapolation reconstructs the incident waves with displacement amplitudes increased by a fixed factor of exactly two when free-surface reflections and conversions are in the data. In this implementation, reconstructed (virtual) waves propagating upward from the free surface enter an absorbing zone and disappear.


Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. S199-S207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Sun ◽  
George A. McMechan ◽  
Chen-Shao Lee ◽  
Jinder Chow ◽  
Chen-Hong Chen

Using two independent, 3D scalar reverse-time depth migrations, we migrate the reflected P- and S-waves in a prestack 3D, three-component (3-C), elastic seismic data volume generated with a P-wave source in a 3D model and recorded at the top of the model. Reflected P- and S-waves are extracted by divergence (a scalar) and curl (a 3-C vector) calculations, respectively, during shallow downward extrapolation of the elastic seismic data. The imaging time for the migrations of both the reflected P- and P-S converted waves at each point is the one-way P-wave traveltime from the source to that point.The divergence (the extracted P-waves) is reverse-time extrapolated using a finite-difference solution of the 3D scalar wave equation in a 3D P-velocity modeland is imaged to obtain the migrated P-image. The curl (the extracted S-waves) is first converted into a scalar S-wavefield by taking the curl’s absolute value as the absolute value of the scalar S-wavefield and assigning a positive sign if the curl is counterclockwise relative to the source or a negative sign otherwise. This scalar S-wavefield is then reverse-time extrapolated using a finite-difference solution of the 3D scalar wave equation in a 3D S-velocity model, and it is imaged with the same one-way P-wave traveltime imaging condition as that used for the P-wave. This achieves S-wave polarity uniformity and ensures constructive S-wave interference between data from adjacent sources. The algorithm gives satisfactory results on synthetic examples for 3D laterally inhomogeneous models.


Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. Q27-Q36 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Gaiser ◽  
Ivan Vasconcelos ◽  
Rosemarie Geetan ◽  
John Faragher

In this study, elastic-wavefield interferometry was used to recover P- and S-waves from the 3D P-wave vibrator VSP data at Wamsutter field in Wyoming. S-wave velocity and birefringence is of particular interest for the geophysical objectives of lithology discrimination and fracture characterization in naturally fractured tight gas sand reservoirs. Because we rely on deconvolution interferometry for retrieving interreceiver P- and S-waves in the subsurface, the output fields are suitable for high-resolution, local reservoir characterization. In 1D media where the borehole is nearly vertical, data at the stationary-phase point is not conducive to conventional interferometry. Strong tube-wave noise generated by physical sources near the borehole interfere with S-wave splitting analyses. Also, converted P- to S-wave (PS-wave) polarity reversals occur at zero offset and cancel their recovery. We developed methods to eliminate tube-wave noise by removing physical sources at the stationary-phase point and perturbing the integration path in the integrand based on P-wave NMO velocity of the direct-arrival. This results in using nonphysical energy outside a Fresnel radius that could not have propagated between receivers. To limit the response near the stationary-phase point, we also applied a weighting condition to suppress energy from large offsets. For PS-waves, a derivative-like operator was applied to the physical sources at zero offset in the form of a polarity reversal. These methods resulted in effectively recovering P-wave dipole and PS-wave quadrupole pseudosource VSPs. The retrieved wavefields kinematically correspond to a vertical incidence representation of reflectivity/transmissivity and can be used for conventional P- and S-wave velocity analyses. Four-component PS-wave VSPs retrieve S-wave splitting in transmitted converted waves that provide calibration for PS-wave and P-wave azimuthal anisotropy measurements from surface-seismic data.


2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Rajput ◽  
Michael Ring

For the past two decades, most of the shear-wave (S-wave) or converted wave (P-S) acquisitions were performed with P-wave source by making the use of downgoing P-waves converting to upgoing S-waves at the mode conversion boundaries. The processing of converted waves requires studying asymmetric reflection at the conversion point, difference in geometries and conditions of source and receiver, and the partitioning of energy into orthogonally polarised components. Interpretation of P-S sections incorporates the identification of P-S waves, full waveform modeling, correlation with P-wave sections and depth migration. The main applications of P-S wave imaging are to obtain a measure of subsurface S-wave properties relating to rock type and fluid saturation (in addition to the P-wave values), imaging through gas clouds and shale diapers, and imaging interfaces with low P-wave contrast but significant S-wave changes. This study examines the major differences in processing of P and P-S wave surveys and the feasibility of identifying converted mode reflections by P-wave sources in anisotropic media. Two-dimensional synthetic seismograms for a realistic rocky mountain foothills model were studied. A Kirchhoff-based technique that includes anisotropic velocities is used for depth migration of converted waves. The results from depth imaging show that P-S section help in distinguishing amplitude associated with hydrocarbons from those caused by localised stratigraphic changes. In addition, the full waveform elastic modeling is useful in finding an appropriate balance between capturing high-quality P-wave data and P-S data challenges in a survey.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document