scholarly journals Cervical screening in assertive outreach team patients

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S99-S100
Author(s):  
Hannah Reynolds ◽  
Samaila Bello ◽  
Hanna Leech

AimsTo assess the uptake of cervical screening in patients under Birmingham and Solihull Assertive Outreach Teams; this included a re-audit of patients under the Central Birmingham Assertive Outreach Team.BackgroundPatients with severe and enduring mental illness are known to have poorer physical health outcomes. In Birmingham and Solihull there are 6 Assertive Outreach Teams. These teams manage patients with a diagnosis of psychosis who have complex needs requiring intensive multidisciplinary input and often struggle to engage with health services. The national cervical screening programme aims to prevent cervical cancer by detecting and treating cervical abnormalities. Acceptable coverage is defined as screening at least 80% of people aged 25–49 years within the last 3.5 years and 80% of people aged 50–64 years within the last 5.5 years. In 2018 71.4% of women in England and 70.9% in the West Midlands were screened adequately. An audit of 15 patients under the Central Birmingham Assertive Outreach Team in 2014 showed 46.2% had taken up screening, measured in the last 5 years for those aged 50–64 years and the last 3 years for those aged 25–49 years.MethodA list was obtained of all female patients under the Assertive Outreach Teams with patients excluded if they were under 25 years or over 64 years or if they were known to have undergone a total hysterectomy. All GP practices with eligible patients registered to them were written to requesting the date of the patient's most recent smear test. Cervical screening was classed as in date if carried out in the last 3.5 years for patients aged 25–49 years or 5.5 years for patients aged 50–64 years.ResultOut of 127 eligible patients, 110 had correct GP details on their record. Responses were received regarding 101 patients, 48 of whom had in date cervical screening (47.5%). Of 58 patients aged 25–49 years, 26 had in date cervical screening (44.8%). Of 43 patients aged 50–64 years, 22 had in date cervical screening (51.2%).Conclusion13.4% patients did not have a known GP practice, increasing the risk of multiple poor physical health outcomes. The rates of cervical screening among Assertive Outreach Team patients are similar to the original audit in 2014 and fall significantly below the national standards and averages. These findings, along with the importance of working together to address the need for physical health monitoring in this population, will be communicated with the local Assertive Outreach Teams and GP practices.

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin L. Toblin ◽  
Brian Kok ◽  
Lyndon A. Riviere ◽  
Charles W. Hoge

Author(s):  
Gayathri S. Kumar ◽  
Jenna A. Beeler ◽  
Emma E. Seagle ◽  
Emily S. Jentes

AbstractSeveral studies describe the health of recently resettled refugee populations in the US beyond the first 8 months after arrival. This review summarizes the results of these studies. Scientific articles from five databases published from January 2008 to March 2019 were reviewed. Articles were included if study subjects included any of the top five US resettlement populations during 2008–2018 and if data described long-term physical health outcomes beyond the first 8 months after arrival in the US. Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria (1.5%). Refugee adults had higher odds of having a chronic disease compared with non-refugee immigrant adults, and an increased risk for diabetes compared with US-born controls. The most commonly reported chronic diseases among Iraqi, Somali, and Bhutanese refugee adults included diabetes and hypertension. Clinicians should consider screening and evaluating for chronic conditions in the early resettlement period. Further evaluations can build a more comprehensive, long-term health profile of resettled refugees to inform public health practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-294
Author(s):  
Jeannie B. Concha ◽  
Kristen Kelly ◽  
Briana Mezuk

Background. Hispanics/Latinos in the United States experience both a health advantage and disadvantage in developing diabetes. Ethnic identity, a predictor of psychological well-being, has not been widely applied to physical health outcomes. The objective of this study is to apply what is known regarding ethnic identity and psychological health to physical health outcomes (diabetes) and to explore the moderating effect of education as a possible underlying mechanism of the Hispanic Health Advantage/Disadvantage. Specifically, this study examines (a) the association between ethnic identity and diabetes prevalence among adult Hispanics/Latinos and (b) determines whether education modifies this relationship. Method. Data come from the nationally representative adult U.S. household study, National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS), collected in 2001 to 2003 ( N = 1,746). Multiple logistic regression was conducted to examine the relationship between ethnic identity, education, and their interaction with likelihood of diabetes. Results. Hispanics/Latinos with high ethnic identity have a higher odds of reporting diabetes among those with 13 to 15 years of education (odds ratio: 1.84; 95% confidence interval: 1.16–2.92) and a lower odds among those with 16+ years of education (odds ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.34–0.84). Ethnic identity is associated with diabetes prevalence and the relationship is moderated by educational attainment. Conclusion. Given the growth, diversity, and diabetes disparities among Hispanics/Latinos, our buffering and exacerbating findings exemplify the complexity and fluidity of theory in understanding psychological/behavioral processes. The findings highlight the importance of designing targeted health interventions that take into account the diverse psychosocial and educational experiences of Hispanics/Latinos.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document