Design Strategies for the Seismic Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Frames

1993 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 817-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
José A. Pincheira

Due to economical and practical considerations, the seismic rehabilitation of buildings is generally confined to strategic areas of the structure in which only selected elements are modified or new elements are added. While these modified or new elements can be designed to have substantial strength and ductility, studies have shown that unless the retrofit scheme is stiff enough to control lateral drifts, significant damage to existing non-strengthened elements can be expected. This paper summarizes some of the results of a series of analytical studies conducted on prototype reinforced concrete frames strengthened with some of the most commonly used rehabilitation techniques. Based on the results of these studies, a design strategy that uses lateral drift rather than lateral strength as the main criterion for the design of retrofit schemes is presented.

2015 ◽  
Vol 789-790 ◽  
pp. 1140-1144
Author(s):  
Fatih Bahadir ◽  
Fatih Süleyman Balik

This study used test frames were purposely detailed and constructed with observed deficiencies in investigated dormitory buildings of Turkey. In this study, four reinforced concrete frames were produced two storeys, one bay and 3D in 1/6 geometric scale was tested. Since the studied frame was the external frame of the structure, brick infill wall with a window opening was also included. The first specimen was the reference specimen and contained no strengthening and no brick wall. The second specimen was contained brick wall. The third specimen was strengthened with internal steel panel. Finally fourth specimen’s was strengthened with infilled RC shear wall. The test specimens were subjected to reversed cyclic quasi-static lateral loading. Strength of the test specimens were measured and compared. Test results indicated that the strengthened specimens displayed significantly higher lateral strength than the reference specimen considerably.


Author(s):  
M. Rodriguez

The strength and ductility capacities of several structural sections of members in typical reinforced concrete frames designed with Mexican Codes are calculated using analytical models for confined concrete and reinforcing steel. These ductility capacities are associated with global displacement ductilities in the RC frames using approximate methods of analysis described in this paper. Results obtained in this investigation are correlated with typical pattern of structural damage in RC frames observed during the 1985 Mexico Earthquake. Some aspects of the seismic performance of fully ductile frames designed according to the 1987 Mexico City Building Code are also discussed, as well as the effect of some mechanical properties of reinforcing steel on the strength and ductility of RC frames.


1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 565-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Park

In the design of multistorey moment-resisting reinforced concrete frames to resist severe earthquakes the emphasis should be on good structural concepts and detailing of reinforcement. Poor structural concepts can lead to major damage or collapse due to column sidesway mechanisms or excessive twisting as a result of soft storeys or lack of structural symmetry or uniformity. Poor detailing of reinforcement can lead to brittle connections, inadequate anchorage of reinforcement, or insufficient transverse reinforcement to prevent shear failure, premature buckling of compressed bars or crushing of compressed concrete. In the seismic provisions of the New Zealand concrete design code special considerations are given to the ratio of column flexural strength to beam flexural strength necessary to reduce the likelihood of plastic hinges forming simultaneously in the top and bottom of columns, the ratio of shear strength to flexural strength necessary to avoid shear failures in beams and columns at large inelastic deformations, the detailing of beams and columns for adequate flexural strength and ductility, and the detailing of beams, columns and beam-column joints for adequate shear resistance and bar anchorage. Differences exist between current United States and New Zealand code provisions for detailing beams and columns for ductility and for the design of beam-column joints.


2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.V. FEDOROVA ◽  
◽  
FAN DINH GUOK ◽  
NGUYEN THI CHANG ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Seung-Jae Lee ◽  
Tae-Sung Eom ◽  
Eunjong Yu

AbstractThis study analytically investigated the behavior of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills. For the analysis, VecTor2, a nonlinear finite element analysis program that implements the Modified Compression Field Theory and Disturbed Stress Field Model, was used. To account for the slip behavior at the mortar joints in the masonry element, the hyperbolic Mohr–Coulomb yield criterion, defined as a function of cohesion and friction angle, was used. The analysis results showed that the lateral resistance and failure mode of the infilled frames were significantly affected by the thickness of the masonry infill, cohesion on the mortar joint–brick interface, and poor mortar filling (or gap) on the masonry boundary under the beam. Diagonal strut actions developed along two or three load paths on the mortar infill, including the backstay actions near the tension column and push-down actions near the compression columns. Such backstay and push-down actions increased the axial and shear forces of columns, and ultimately affect the strength, ductility, and failure mode of the infilled frames.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document