scholarly journals Microsatellite Instability Is Associated With the Presence of Lynch Syndrome Pan-Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Latham ◽  
Preethi Srinivasan ◽  
Yelena Kemel ◽  
Jinru Shia ◽  
Chaitanya Bandlamudi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Immunohistochemical Staining ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing

PURPOSE Microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) testing has traditionally been performed in patients with colorectal (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) to screen for Lynch syndrome (LS)–associated cancer predisposition. The recent success of immunotherapy in high-frequency MSI (MSI-H) and/or MMR-D tumors now supports testing for MSI in all advanced solid tumors. The extent to which LS accounts for MSI-H across heterogeneous tumor types is unknown. Here, we establish the prevalence of LS across solid tumors according to MSI status. METHODS MSI status was determined using targeted next-generation sequencing, with tumors classified as MSI-H, MSI-indeterminate, or microsatellite-stable. Matched germline DNA was analyzed for mutations in LS-associated mismatch repair genes ( MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM). In patients with LS with MSI-H/I tumors, immunohistochemical staining for MMR-D was assessed. RESULTS Among 15,045 unique patients (more than 50 cancer types), LS was identified in 16.3% (53 of 326), 1.9% (13 of 699), and 0.3% (37 of 14,020) of patients with MSI-H, MSI-indeterminate, and microsatellite-stable tumors, respectively ( P < .001). Among patients with LS with MSI-H/I tumors, 50% (33 of 66) had tumors other than CRC/EC, including urothelial, prostate, pancreas, adrenocortical, small bowel, sarcoma, mesothelioma, melanoma, gastric, and germ cell tumors. In these patients with non-CRC/EC tumors, 45% (15 of 33) did not meet LS genetic testing criteria on the basis of personal/family history. Immunohistochemical staining of LS-positive MSI-H/I tumors demonstrated MMR-D in 98.2% (56 of 57) of available cases. CONCLUSION MSI-H/MMR-D is predictive of LS across a much broader tumor spectrum than currently appreciated. Given implications for cancer surveillance and prevention measures in affected families, these data support germline genetic assessment for LS for patients with an MSI-H/MMR-D tumor, regardless of cancer type or family cancer history.

scholarly journals Feasibility of Screening for Lynch Syndrome Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (35) ◽  
pp. 5783-5788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Hampel ◽  
Wendy L. Frankel ◽  
Edward Martin ◽  
Mark Arnold ◽  
Karamjit Khanduja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
Gene Testing ◽  
Revised Bethesda Guidelines ◽  
Repair Genes ◽  
Entire Study Cohort

Purpose Identifying individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) is highly beneficial. However, it is unclear whether microsatellite instability (MSI) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) should be used as the screening test and whether screening should target all patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or those in high-risk subgroups. Patients and Methods MSI testing and IHC for the four mismatch repair proteins was performed on 500 tumors from unselected patients with CRC. If either MSI or IHC was abnormal, complete mutation analysis for the mismatch repair genes was performed. Results Among the 500 patients, 18 patients (3.6%) had LS. All 18 patients detected with LS (100%) had MSI-high tumors; 17 (94%) of 18 patients with LS were correctly predicted by IHC. Of the 18 probands, only eight patients (44%) were diagnosed at age younger than 50 years, and only 13 patients (72%) met the revised Bethesda guidelines. When these results were added to data on 1,066 previously studied patients, the entire study cohort (N = 1,566) showed an overall prevalence of 44 of 1,566 patients (2.8%; 95% CI, 2.1% to 3.8%) for LS. For each proband, on average, three additional family members carried MMR mutations. Conclusion One of every 35 patients with CRC has LS, and each has at least three relatives with LS; all of whom can benefit from increased cancer surveillance. For screening, IHC is almost equally sensitive as MSI, but IHC is more readily available and helps to direct gene testing. Limiting tumor analysis to patients who fulfill Bethesda criteria would fail to identify 28% (or one in four) cases of LS.

Microsatellite Instability, Mismatch Repair Deficiency, and BRAF Mutation in Treatment-Resistant Germ Cell Tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (13) ◽  
pp. 2129-2136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedemann Honecker ◽  
Hendrik Wermann ◽  
Frank Mayer ◽  
Ad J.M. Gillis ◽  
Hans Stoop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Cisplatin Resistance ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Mmr Deficiency

Purpose Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and microsatellite instability (MSI) are associated with cisplatin resistance in human germ cell tumors (GCTs). BRAF mutation (V600E) is found in MSI colorectal cancers. The role of RAS/RAF pathway mutations in GCT treatment response is unknown. Patients and Methods Two patient cohorts were investigated: 100 control GCTs (50 seminomas and 50 nonseminomas) and 35 cisplatin-based chemotherapy-resistant GCTs. MMR proteins were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, and eight microsatellite loci were examined for MSI. Tumors were assessed for specific BRAF and KRAS mutations. Results Resistant tumors showed a higher incidence of MSI than controls: 26% versus 0% in two or more loci (P < .0001). All resistant tumors were wild-type KRAS, and two controls (2%) contained a KRAS mutation. There was a significantly higher incidence of BRAF V600E mutation in resistant tumors compared with controls: 26% versus 1% (P < .0001). BRAF mutations were highly correlated with MSI (P = .006), and MSI and mutated BRAF were correlated with weak or absent staining for hMLH1 (P = .017 and P = .008). Low or absent staining of hMLH1 was correlated with promoter hypermethylation (P < .001). Tumors lacking expression of hMLH1 or MSH6 were significantly more frequent in resistant GCTs than in controls (P = .001 and 0.0036, respectively). Within the subgroup of resistant tumors, patients with MSI showed a trend to longer progression-free survival (P = .068). Conclusion We report for the first time a correlation between a gene mutation—BRAF V600E—and cisplatin resistance in nonseminomatous GCTs. Furthermore, a correlation between MMR deficiency, MSI, and treatment failure is confirmed.

Antitumor activity of dostarlimab in patients with mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability–high tumors: A combined analysis of two cohorts in the GARNET study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2564-2564
Author(s):  
Dominique Berton ◽  
Susana N. Banerjee ◽  
Giuseppe Curigliano ◽  
Sara Cresta ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Tumor Types

2564 Background: Dostarlimab is an investigational, humanized programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction with the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. GARNET (NCT02715284) is a phase 1 study assessing the antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with solid tumors. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study is being conducted in 2 parts: dose escalation and expansion. Here we report on the 2 expansion cohorts that enrolled mismatch repair–deficient/microsatellite instability–high (dMMR/MSI-H) patients. Cohort A1 enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer (EC), and cohort F enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H or POLε-hypermutated non-EC solid tumors, mainly gastrointestinal (GI) tumors (99 [93.4%] had GI tumors, including 69 [65.1%] with colorectal cancer). Patients received 500 mg IV of dostarlimab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by RECIST v1.1. Here we report ORR and DOR, by individual cohort and as an overall population, in patients with dMMR tumors identified by immunohistochemistry testing. Results: For this interim analysis, an efficacy analysis was performed for the patients who had baseline measurable disease and ≥6 months of follow-up in the study (N = 209). The ORR was 41.6% (95% CI, 34.9%–48.6%) for the combined A1+F dMMR cohorts (Table). Responses were durable, and median DOR has not been reached in either cohort (median follow-up: cohort A1, 16.3 months; cohort F, 12.4 months). A total of 267 patients were included in the safety population (all patients who received ≥1 dose; cohort A1, N = 126; cohort F, N = 141). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were consistent across tumor types. Overall, the most frequently reported any-grade TRAEs were asthenia (13.9%), diarrhea (13.5%), and fatigue (11.2%). The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were anemia (2.2%), lipase increased (1.9%), alanine aminotransferase increased (1.1%), and diarrhea (1.1%). No deaths were attributed to dostarlimab. Conclusions: Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with dMMR solid tumors, with consistent antitumor activity seen across endometrial and nonendometrial tumor types. The safety profile was manageable, with no new safety signals detected. Most TRAEs were low grade and were similar across cohorts. Clinical trial information: NCT02715284. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Immunotherapy, Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Robert Lichtenstern ◽  
Rachael Katie Ngu ◽  
Shabnam Shalapour ◽  
Michael Karin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
The United States ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Adoptive T Cell Therapy ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
T Cell Therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer type, and third highest in mortality rates among cancer-related deaths in the United States. Originating from intestinal epithelial cells in the colon and rectum, that are impacted by numerous factors including genetics, environment and chronic, lingering inflammation, CRC can be a problematic malignancy to treat when detected at advanced stages. Chemotherapeutic agents serve as the historical first line of defense in the treatment of metastatic CRC. In recent years, however, combinational treatment with targeted therapies, such as vascular endothelial growth factor, or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, has proven to be quite effective in patients with specific CRC subtypes. While scientific and clinical advances have uncovered promising new treatment options, the five-year survival rate for metastatic CRC is still low at about 14%. Current research into the efficacy of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) in mismatch repair deficient and microsatellite instability high (dMMR–MSI-H) CRC tumors have shown promising results, but its use in other CRC subtypes has been either unsuccessful, or not extensively explored. This Review will focus on the current status of immunotherapies, including ICI, vaccination and adoptive T cell therapy (ATC) in the treatment of CRC and its potential use, not only in dMMR–MSI-H CRC, but also in mismatch repair proficient and microsatellite instability low (pMMR-MSI-L).

scholarly journals Understanding Inherited Risk in Unselected Newly Diagnosed Patients With Endometrial Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Karen A. Cadoo ◽  
Diana L. Mandelker ◽  
Semanti Mukherjee ◽  
Carolyn Stewart ◽  
Deborah DeLair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Germline Variants ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Generation Sequencing

PURPOSE Mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes and PTEN, diagnostic of Lynch and Cowden syndromes, respectively, represent the only established inherited predisposition genes in endometrial cancer to date. The prevalence of other cancer predisposition genes remains unclear. We determined the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in unselected patients with endometrial cancer scheduled for surgical consultation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients prospectively consented (April 2016 to May 2017) to an institutional review board–approved protocol of tumor-normal sequencing via a custom next-generation sequencing panel—the Memorial Sloan Kettering–Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets—that yielded germline results for more than 75 cancer predisposition genes. Tumors were assessed for microsatellite instability. Per institutional standards, all tumors underwent Lynch syndrome screening via immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair proteins. RESULTS Of 156 patients who consented to germline genetic testing, 118 (76%) had stage I disease. In 104 patients (67%), tumors were endometrioid, and 60 (58%) of those tumors were grade 1. Twenty-four pathogenic germline variants were identified in 22 patients (14%): seven (4.5%) had highly penetrant cancer syndromes and 15 (9.6%) had variants in low-penetrance, moderate-penetrance, or recessive genes. Of these, five (21%) were in Lynch syndrome genes (two MSH6, two PMS2, and one MLH1). All five tumors had concordant IHC staining; two (40%) were definitively microsatellite instability–high by next-generation sequencing. One patient had a known BRCA1 mutation, and one had an SMARCA4 deletion. The remaining 17 variants (71%) were incremental findings in low- and moderate-penetrance variants or genes associated with recessive disease. CONCLUSION In unselected patients with predominantly low-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer, germline multigene panel testing identified cancer predisposition gene variants in 14%. This finding may have implications for future cancer screening and risk-reduction recommendations. Universal IHC screening for Lynch syndrome successfully identifies the majority (71%) of high-penetrance germline mutations.

Tumor site discordance in mismatch repair deficiency in synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1951-1958
Author(s):  
Soyoun Rachel Kim ◽  
Alicia Tone ◽  
Raymond Kim ◽  
Matthew Cesari ◽  
Blaise Clarke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Ovarian Tumor ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Mismatch Repair Deficiency ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
Repair Deficiency ◽  
Endometrial Tumor ◽  
Germline Testing

ObjectivesFor synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers, most centers rely on mismatch repair testing of the endometrial cancer to identify Lynch syndrome, and neglect the ovarian tumor site completely. We examined the mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability results from the endometrium and ovary to assess discordance between the tumor sites and between tests.Methods30 women with newly diagnosed synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer were prospectively recruited from three cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. Both tumor sites were assessed for mismatch repair deficiency by immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability test; discordance in results between tumor sites and discordance between test results at each site was examined. Cases with discordant results had tumors sequenced with a targeted panel in order to reconcile the findings. All women underwent mismatch repair gene germline testing.ResultsOf 30 patients, 11 (37%) were mismatch repair deficient or microsatellite instable at either tumor site, with 5 (17%) testing positive for Lynch syndrome. Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry expression was discordant between endometrial and ovarian tumor sites in 2 of 27 patients (7%) while microsatellite instability results were discordant in 2 of 25 patients (8%). Relying on immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability alone on the endometrial tumor would have missed one and three cases of Lynch syndrome, respectively. One patient with Lynch syndrome with a PMS2 pathogenic variant was not detected by either immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability testing. The rate of discordance between immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability test was 3.8% in the ovary and 12% in the endometrium.ConclusionsThere was discordance in immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability results between tumor sites and between tests within each site. Endometrial tumor testing with mismatch repair immunohistochemistry performed well, but missed one case of Lynch syndrome. Given the high incidence of Lynch syndrome (17%), consideration may be given to germline testing in all patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers.

Use of immunohistochemical versus microsatellite analyses as markers for colorectal cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-141
Author(s):  
Utku Tantoğlu ◽  
Seher Yüksel ◽  
Cihangir Akyol ◽  
Haldun Doğan ◽  
Nükhet Kutlay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Immunohistochemical Analysis ◽  
Sporadic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Molecular Tests ◽  
Antibody Panel ◽  
Mismatch Repair Proteins ◽  
Good Concordance

Abstract Objectives: Our aim was to determine how well immunohistochemical analysis identified colon cancer patients with microsatellite instability in Turkish patients. Material and methods: Subjects were patients that underwent surgery for colorectal cancer in our institution between 2006 and 2011. Patients were grouped as: (1) suspected Lynch syndrome (n=14), (2) familial colorectal cancer (n=14), and (3) sporadic colorectal cancer groups (n=14). Mismatch repair proteins were analyzed by a four antibody-panel immunohistochemistry. Microsatellite instability analysis was conducted on DNA samples using MSI-PCR followed by fragment analysis. Results: The immunohistochemistry and PCR results had good concordance in 35/42 patients. Both microsatellite instability and at least one mismatch repair protein deficiency were detected in 11 patients, and both microsatellite stability and normal expression of mismatch repair proteins were detected in 24 patients. Test results were discordant in seven of the patients. Conclusion: As it is not feasible to perform expensive molecular tests in healthcare units in many developing countries, the four antibody-panel immunohistochemistry is a reliable and affordable method for screening for colorectal cancer, including Lynch syndrome and sporadic cases when suspected.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document