Randomized study of continuous infusion fluorouracil versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Kemeny ◽  
K Israel ◽  
D Niedzwiecki ◽  
D Chapman ◽  
J Botet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Carcinoma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Partial Response Rate ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Routine Therapy

One hundred twenty-two chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma were entered into a randomized trial comparing infusional fluorouracil (FU) versus cisplatin (CDDP) and FU. In both groups, patients received continuous infusion FU 1,000 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Patients randomized to CDDP/FU also received CDDP 20 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) bolus on days 1 to 5 of each cycle. Patients were comparable in terms of age, performance status, baseline laboratory values, dominant sites of measurable disease, and percent of liver involvement. The partial response rate was significantly greater in patients who received CDDP/FU versus FU alone (25% v 3%, P = .001). Patients who received CDDP/FU experienced significantly greater toxicity compared with FU alone: grades 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 22% and 0% of patients, respectively (P = .0001); grades 2 to 4 nausea and vomiting occurred in 80% and 15% of patients, respectively (P = .0001). There were no significant differences in either the duration of response (median, 6 and 4.7 months for CDDP/FU and FU groups, respectively) or survival (median 10, and 12 months, respectively). Compared with infusional FU alone, CDDP/FU provided a significantly greater partial response rate with increased toxicity, but it did not improve overall survival in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Therefore, the use of CDDP/FU as routine therapy for the treatment of colorectal carcinoma cannot be recommended.

Phase II Evaluation of 4'EPI-Doxorubicin in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma

1984 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eros Ferrazzi ◽  
Giovanni L. Pappagallo ◽  
Ornella Nicoletta ◽  
Adriano Fornasiero ◽  
Franca Refarti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Carcinoma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma ◽  
Colonic Primary ◽  
Gastrointestinal Complaints ◽  
Electrocardiographic Abnormalities

Thirty-four evaluable patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (13 rectal primary and 21 colonic primary, 4 pretreated and 30 untreated) received 4'epi-doxorubicin at the dose of 75 mg/m2 i.v. once every 21 days, for a minimum of 2 courses. Symptomatic toxicity (mainly confined to gastrointestinal complaints) was short-lived and easily managed. Hematologic toxicity was mild. Transient electrocardiographic abnormalities were found in 50 % of patients, without signs of significant cumulative cardiotoxicity. Three previously untreated patients achieved a partial response (lasting 16, 12 and 12 weeks, respectively) with a response rate of 9 % (3 % - 23 %, 95 % confidence interval). More interestingly, all responsive patients had rectal cancer: further studies of 4'epi-doxorubicin confined to the rectal localization seem warranted.

Comparison of Results from a Phase 1/2 Study of Lumiliximab (Anti-CD23) in Combination with FCR for Patients with Relapsed CLL with Published FCR Results.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 32-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Januario Castro ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Variable Regions ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Lumiliximab is a PRIMATIZED® anti-CD23 monoclonal antibody with human IgG1 constant regions and macaque variable regions. Preclinical data demonstrated that lumiliximab enhanced both fludarabine- and rituximab- mediated apoptosis in CLL cells. Thus, a Phase 1/2, open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter study (Study 152–30) evaluating lumiliximab + fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (L + FCR) for relapsed CD23+ B-cell CLL was initiated. Treatment has been completed and follow-up is ongoing. Thirty-one patients (pts) received either 375 mg/m2 (n=3) or 500 mg/m2 (n=28) of lumiliximab in combination with a 28-day cycle of FCR for up to 6 cycles. Median age at study entry was 58 yrs. The majority of pts (74%) were Rai Stage I/II. The most common adverse events included nausea (77%), pyrexia (61%), chills (55%), neutropenia (55%), and fatigue (48%). Twenty pts (65%) experienced a Grade 3 or 4 event. An overall response rate of 71% was demonstrated: 48% complete response (CR), 10% partial response (PR), and 13% unconfirmed PR. Currently, baseline cytogenetic data is available for 21 pts who received 500 mg/m2 of lumiliximab. Although preliminary, 1 of the 4 pts with del(17p13.1) responded; of the 6 pts with del(11q22.3), 5 responded with 4 attaining a CR. A comparison with published data from a study of FCR alone in 177 pts with relapsed or refractory CLL conducted at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) (Wierda W, O’Brien S, Wen S, et al. J Clin Oncol.2005;23:4070–4078) demonstrated that L + FCR has an acceptable safety profile, does not appear to increase the toxicity (including myelosuppression) of the FCR regimen, and compares favorably with the CR rate of the FCR regimen alone, as displayed in Table 1. Most pt characteristics (age, gender, median number of prior therapies, and WHO performance status) were similar between the 2 studies; however, more pts in the MDACC study were Rai Stage III-IV (50% vs 22%) and were rituximab-naïve (88% vs 40%). Furthermore, there were no obvious differences in hematologic toxicity between the 2 studies and the tolerability of L + FCR was similar to that of FCR, with approximately 50% percent of pts completing 6 cycles of treatment in both studies. These data suggest that L + FCR may produce a higher complete response rate than FCR without additional toxicity. Based upon this data, a multicenter, global, randomized study of L + FCR vs. FCR alone is being initiated. Table 1. Comparison of Responses in Study 152–30 and the MDACC Study Study 152–30, L + FCR (N=31), n (%) MDACC, FCR (N =177), n (%) 1CR and PR response criteria were the same in both studies. 2PRu is included in the OR. Overall Response 22 (71%) 130 (73%) Complete Response1 15 (48%) 45 (25%) Partial Response1 3 (10%) 85 (48%) Unconfirmed Partial Response2 4 (13%)

A phase III randomized study comparing cisplatin and fluorouracil as single agents and in combination for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Jacobs ◽  
G Lyman ◽  
E Velez-García ◽  
K S Sridhar ◽  
W Knight ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Significant Difference

PURPOSE To determine whether combination chemotherapy is superior to single agents for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin (CP) and fluorouracil (5-FU), alone and in combination in a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred forty-nine patients with recurrent head and neck cancer were randomized to one of three treatments: CP (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1 g/m2 x 4), CP, or 5-FU every 3 weeks. RESULTS The overall response rate to the combination (32%) was superior to that of CP (17%) or 5-FU (13%) (P = .035). Response was associated with good performance status (PS) but not with primary site, site of recurrence, histology, prior irradiation, or relative dose intensity. Median time to progression was less than 2.5 months, and there was no significant difference in median survival (5.7 months) among the groups. By multivariate analysis, patients with better PS and poorly differentiated tumors had superior survival. Hematologic toxicity and alopecia were worse in the combination arm. CONCLUSION Although the response rate to the combination of CP plus 5-FU was superior to that achieved with single agents, survival did not improve.

Gemcitabine as a Single Agent in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 3786-3792 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Fosså ◽  
A. Santoro ◽  
W. Hiddemann ◽  
L. Truemper ◽  
N. Niederle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphomas

PURPOSE: A multicenter phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with B-cell intermediate or high-grade NHL (Working Formulation) were enrolled onto the study. The median age was 61 years, with a Karnofsky performance status of ≤ 80% in 65% of patients. Forty-eight percent had stage III or IV (Ann Arbor Classification) at study entry. Pretreatment consisted of one, two, or three chemotherapeutic regimens in nine, 11, and 11 patients, respectively. Gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 was administered intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day schedule. RESULTS: Thirty patients were assessable for efficacy, and 31 were assessable for toxicity. No complete responses were observed, but six patients showed a partial response, 11 stable disease, and 13 progressive disease. The overall response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 39%) for assessable patients and 19% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 34%) for the intent-to-treat analysis. The median duration of partial response was 6 months (range, 3.7 to 15+ months). Nonhematologic World Health Organization grade 3 toxicity included hepatic toxicity in four patients and infection in two. Hematologic toxicity was observed as grade 3 anemia in three patients, grade 3 leukopenia in two patients, grade 3/4 neutropenia in two patients, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in six patients. CONCLUSION: The present schedule of gemcitabine displays modest efficacy and mild toxicity in pretreated aggressive NHL.

Treatment of refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia with fludarabine phosphate via the group C protocol mechanism of the National Cancer Institute: five-year follow-up report.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 458-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Sorensen ◽  
D A Vena ◽  
A Fallavollita ◽  
H G Chun ◽  
B D Cheson
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
National Cancer Institute ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Motor Dysfunction ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Contributing Factors

PURPOSE To provide fludarabine to physicians for the management of patients with advanced refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and to determine the response rate and duration, toxicity, and survival with this agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase II protocol was open to all eligible patients whose local physicians obtained written permission from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to register patients onto this protocol. Of 791 national and international enrolled patients, 724 with a median age of 65 years received fludarabine, of which 703 were assessable for response. RESULTS Thirty-two percent of assessable patients responded (95% confidence interval [CI], 29% to 36%), with 21 patients (3%) obtaining a complete response and 205 (29%) a partial response. The median duration of response was 13.1 months and the median survival time from registration was 12.6 months. Age, performance status (PS), and Rai stage correlated with survival (P < .01). Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was reported in 43% and was associated with infection in 22%. Neurotoxicity (primarily grade 1 motor dysfunction) was reported in 14% patients and correlated with age. CONCLUSION This study describes the toxicity and activity of fludarabine in refractory CLL in a setting that more closely resembles clinical practice than most published trials. The low response rate may be related to advanced stage (89% Rai high-risk), disease-related symptoms (63% had B symptoms), and/or degree of prior treatment. Other contributing factors inherent in a group C treatment protocol included lack of central pathology review, variable supportive care, and a tendency to use this mechanism at a later stage in the disease.

Pemetrexed (MTA) and carboplatin (CBDCA) in the treatment of advanced pleural mesothelioma (MPM)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7093-7093 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Castagneto ◽  
M. Mencoboni ◽  
D. Degiovanni ◽  
A. Muzio ◽  
L. Giaretto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

7093 Background: Aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of MTA and CBDCA combination as first line chemotherapy in advanced MPM. Methods: Chemonaive patients (pts) with histologically proven, an ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2, and measurable advanced MPM were considered. The schedule of administration was: pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 in combination with CBDA AUC 5, once every 21 days for 8 cycles. Results: From July 2003 to March 2005 76 pts (54 male and 22 female) have been treated with this combination chemotherapy. Median age was 62.7 years (range 40–70); median PS 0 (range 0–3); epithelial histologic findings were in 57 (75%), mixed in 13 (17.1%), sarcomatous in 3 (3.9%), and unspecified in 3 (3.9%) pts. A total of 537 cycles was administered (median 7, range 1 to 13). Grade 3 hematologic toxicity according to WHO criteria was seen in 43 (56.6%) pts (neutropenia in 30, thrombocytopenia in 8, and anemia in 5); grade 4 hematologic toxicity in 5 (6.6%) pts. The most common nonhematologic events were grade 3 nausea/vomiting in 10 (13.1%), and fever in 4 (5.3%) pts. 74 pts were evaluable for clinical response. There were 16 (21.%) partial responses (PR) and 3 (3.9%) complete responses (CR), for an overall response rate of 23.9%. 29 (38.2%) pts reported stable disease (SD). The overall survival was considered from date of diagnosis to date of death from any cause or to date of last follow-up. The median survival time for the entire group was estimated at 23 months. Conclusions: The results of this phase II study indicate that, at this dose and schedule, the combination of CBDCA and MTA is moderately active and that the profile of toxicity is acceptable in pts with advanced MPM. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II trial of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14599-14599
Author(s):  
N. Lee ◽  
S. Bae ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
D. Kim ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

14599 Background: We prospectively conducted a phase II trial to test the efficacy and safety of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) regimens for the first-line treatment of previously untreated patients with recurrent or metastatic advanced CRC. Methods: Thirty-four previously untreated patients with advanced CRC were enrolled in this study from June 2001 to December 2006. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, no prior systemic therapy in palliative setting, ECOG PS = 2, adequate organ function, written informed consent and at least one measurable disease. The patients received either irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1 with a LV bolus of 200 mg/m2 and a FU bolus of 400 mg/m2, and this was followed by a FU continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 2 (the classic FOLFIRI regimen), or they were treated with a LV bolus of 400 mg/m2 and a FU bolus of 400 mg/m2 followed by a FU continuous infusion of 2,400 mg/m2 for 46 hours (the simplified FOLFIRI regimen), and these treatments were repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression. Results: There were 13 females and 21 males with median age of 54 years (range: 41–79). The most common metastatic sites were lung and liver. A total of 262 cycles were administrated with median 6 cycles per patient (range: 1–22). All pts were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 pts for response to the treatment. The objective response rate was 26.4% with 2 complete responses respectively. Sixteen (47%) pts had stable disease and 7 (20.5%) had a progression. The tumor control rate was 73.4%. The median TTP was 5.3 months, and the overall survival was 10.1 months. The prognostic factor for longer TTP and survival was the ECOG performance status (PS). The type of regimens was not affected on response rate, TTP and survival. The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and the most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea. The non- hematological toxicities were similar for both treatment groups, with more frequent grade =3 neutropenia being noted for the simplified FOLFIRI regimen. Conclusions: The FOLFIRI regimen was demonstrated to have a moderate antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity profiles, and tend to show more favorable outcome for patients with good ECOG PS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Efficacy of the addition of cisplatin to single-agent first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A joint analysis of the multicenter, randomized phase III MILES-3 and MILES-4 studies.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9002-9002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Gridelli ◽  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Luigi Cavanna ◽  
Andrea Luciani ◽  
Paolo Maione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Joint Analysis ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Single Agent Chemotherapy

9002 Background: The role of platinum in first line treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC is still debated. We tested its efficacy in two parallel phase 3 trials. Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients, > 70 years, ECOG performance status 0-1, were eligible. In MILES-3 (started in 2011) patients with any tumor histology were randomly assigned 1:1 to cisplatin/gemcitabine (C 60 mg/m² d1, G 1000mg/m² dd1,8) or gemcitabine (G 1200 mg/m² dd1,8). In MILES-4 (started in 2013 with a factorial design) patients with non-squamous histology were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to CG, G, cisplatin/pemetrexed (C 60 mg/m² d1, P 500 mg/m² d1) or pemetrexed (P 500 mg/m² d1). Six cycles were planned. In each trial, to have 80% power in detecting a HR of death 0.75 (corresponding to 3-month prolongation of median survival), with 0.05 two-tailed α, 382 events were required. The two trials were closed prematurely because of slow accrual but a joint analysis allowed to properly perform the final analysis, according to IDMC advice. Analysis was based on intention-to treat and adjusted by possible confounding factors. Results: From Mar 2011 to Aug 2016, 531 patients (MILES-3: 299, MILES-4: 232) were assigned to cisplatin-doublet (n = 263) or single-agent chemotherapy (n = 268). Median age was 75, 79% were male, 70% had non-squamous histology. Median number of cycles was 4 and 3 with and without cisplatin, respectively. With a median follow-up of 2 years, 384 deaths and 448 progression-free survival (PFS) events were reported. With and without cisplatin, median OS was 9.6 vs 7.5 months (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.04, p = 0.14); median PFS was 4.6 vs 3.0 months (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.92, p = 0.005); response rate was 15.5% vs 8.5% (p = 0.02). Significantly more severe hematologic toxicity and fatigue were reported with cisplatin. Conclusions: Although improving PFS and response rate, addition of cisplatin to single-agent chemotherapy does not significantly prolong overall survival of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. QOL data will be reported separately. Partially supported by AIFA (grant FARM8KAJZK) and Eli Lilly. Clinical trial information: NCT01405586 and NCT01656551.

Fluoxiuridine (FUDR) chronoinfusion and Interferon for treatment of metastatic renal carcinoma

1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-461
Author(s):  
M. Dal Bianco ◽  
T. Prayer-Galetti ◽  
M. Iafrate ◽  
L. D'Urso ◽  
L. De Zorzi
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Renal Carcinoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Major Side Effect

Fluoxiuridine (FUDR) chronoinfusion through a subcutaneous pump seems to give a 24% objective response rate with mild side effects. From April 1992 to December 1993 we included 18 patients with metastatic renal cell cancer and good performance status (ECOG 0-2) in a phase II study. In our experience we observed a 16% objective response rate without any major side effect. Based on these results we suggest a phase III prospective randomized study.

Effect of Single-Agent Rituximab Given at the Standard Schedule or As Prolonged Treatment in Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Study of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 705-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Ghielmini ◽  
Shu-Fang Hsu Schmitz ◽  
Sergio Cogliatti ◽  
Francesco Bertoni ◽  
Ursula Waltzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Improve Response Rate ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Duration Of Response

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of single-agent rituximab given at the standard or a prolonged schedule in patients with newly diagnosed, or refractory or relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).Patients and MethodsAfter induction treatment with the standard schedule (375 mg/m2weekly × 4), patients who were responding or who had stable disease at week 12 from the start of treatment were randomly assigned to no further treatment (arm A) or prolonged rituximab administration (375 mg/m2) every 8 weeks for four times (arm B).ResultsThe trial enrolled 104 patients. After induction, clinical response was 27% with 2% complete responses. Among patients with detectable t(11;14)-positive cells in blood and bone marrow at baseline, four of 20, and one of 14, respectively, became polymerase chain-reaction–negative after induction. Anemia was the only adverse predictor of response in the multivariate analysis. After a median follow-up of 29 months, response rate and duration of response were not significantly different between the two schedules in 61 randomly assigned patients. Median event-free survival (EFS) was 6 months in arm A versus 12 months in arm B; the difference was not significant (P = .1). Prolonged treatment seemed to improve EFS in the subgroup of pretreated patients (5 months in arm A v 11 months in arm B; P = .04). Thirteen percent of patients in arm A and 9% in arm B presented with grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity.ConclusionSingle-agent rituximab is active in MCL, but the addition of four single doses at 8-week intervals does not seem to significantly improve response rate, duration of response, or EFS after treatment with the standard schedule.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document