Phase II Trial of Weekly Intravenous Gemcitabine With Continuous Infusion Fluorouracil in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2419-2426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Nicholas J. Vogelzang ◽  
Mary C. Dumas ◽  
James L. Wade ◽  
David A. Taber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical response rate of the combination of weekly intravenous (IV) gemcitabine with continuous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1998 and February 1999, 41 patients with metastatic RCC were enrolled onto this multi-institutional phase II study of gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and 5-FU 150 mg/m2/d via continuous IV infusion through a permanent catheter on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients had a Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status of 0 or 1, with a median time since diagnosis of metastatic disease of 10 months (range, 0 to 129 months). Thirty-three patients (80%) had multiple metastatic sites, and 34 patients (83%) had prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 39 assessable patients, there were no complete responses but seven partial responses (objective response rate = 17%; 95% confidence interval, 8% to 34%). Five minor responses (25% to 50% decreased tumor size) were also observed. The duration of response for the seven partial responders was 2, 3, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 14 months. Median progression-free survival for the gemcitabine/5-FU group was 28.7 weeks versus 8 weeks for a similar cohort of patients treated on previous phase II studies at the University of Chicago (P = .008). The regimen was well tolerated, with fatigue, mucositis, nausea/vomiting, and grade 2 hematologic toxicities being most common. CONCLUSION: Weekly gemcitabine with continuous infusion 5-FU is an active combination in patients with metastatic RCC. Therapy was well tolerated and produced an improvement in progression-free survival over historical controls.

An Italian, multicenter, real-world, retrospective study of first-line pazopanib in unselected metastatic renal-cell carcinoma patients: the ‘Pamerit’ study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Mosca ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Giuseppe Procopio ◽  
Umberto Basso ◽  
Giacomo Cartenì ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

Abstract Objective Despite the current immunotherapy era, VEGFR inhibitors maintain effectiveness in metastatic renal cell cancer. Real-world data concerning pazopanib are limited. The aim of this study is to add information about efficacy and safety of pazopanib as first-line treatment in metastatic renal cell cancer patients not enrolled into clinical trials. Methods Retrospective analysis (the PAMERIT study) of first-line pazopanib in real-world metastatic renal cell cancer patients among 39 Centers in Italy. Outcomes were progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate and treatment-related adverse events. Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank test and multivariable Cox’s models were used and adjusted for age, histology, previous renal surgery, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium score and pazopanib initial dose. Results Among 474 patients, 87.3% had clear cell metastatic renal cell cancer histology. Most of them (84.6%) had upfront renal surgery. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 15.8 and 34.4 months, respectively, significantly correlating with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium’s good prognosis (P < 0.001), ECOG PS 0 (P < 0.001), age (<75 years, P = 0.005), surgery (P < 0.001) and response to pazopanib (P < 0.001). After 3 months of pazopanib, overall disease control rate have been observed in 76.6% patients. Among International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium’s favorable group patients, 57/121 (47%) showed complete/partial response. No unexpected AEs emerged. Conclusions In this real-world study, metastatic renal cell cancer patients treated with first-line pazopanib reached greater progression-free survival and overall survival than in pivotal studies and had high response rates when belonging to International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium’s favorable group, without new toxicities. Pazopanib has been confirmed a valid first-line option for International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium’s good prognosis metastatic renal cell cancer patients who cannot be submitted to immunotherapy.

scholarly journals Salvage Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (27) ◽  
pp. 3088-3094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Gul ◽  
Tyler F. Stewart ◽  
Charlene M. Mantia ◽  
Neil J. Shah ◽  
Emily Stern Gatof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The safety and activity of the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients who have received prior ICI targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway remains unknown. We evaluated ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC after prior treatment with anti–PD-1 pathway–targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic RCC who received prior anti–PD-1 pathway-targeted therapy and subsequently received ipilimumab and nivolumab were reviewed. Objective response rate and progression-free survival per investigator assessment were recorded. Toxicity of ipilimumab and nivolumab was also assessed. RESULTS Forty-five patients with metastatic RCC were included. All patients (100%) received prior ICIs targeting the PD-1 pathway. The median age was 62 years (range, 21-82 years). At a median follow-up of 12 months, the objective response rate to ipilimumab and nivolumab was 20%. The median progression-free survival while on ipilimumab and nivolumab was 4 months (range, 0.8-19 months). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade with ipilimumab and nivolumab were recorded in 29 (64%) of the 45 patients; grade 3 irAEs were recorded in 6 (13%) of the 45 patients. CONCLUSION Ipilimumab and nivolumab demonstrated antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic RCC who had prior treatment with checkpoint inhibition.

scholarly journals Randomized Open-Label Phase II Trial of Apitolisib (GDC-0980), a Novel Inhibitor of the PI3K/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway, Versus Everolimus in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (14) ◽  
pp. 1660-1668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Mark R. Lackner ◽  
Stéphane Oudard ◽  
Bernard Escudier ◽  
Christy Ralph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to compare dual inhibition of PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) by apitolisib (GDC-0980) against single inhibition of mTORC1 by everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients and Methods Patients with clear-cell mRCC who progressed on or after vascular endothelial growth factor–targeted therapy were randomly assigned to apitolisib 40 mg once per day or to everolimus 10 mg once per day. End points included progression-free survival, safety, overall survival, and objective response rate. Biomarker assessments were conducted. Results Eighty-five patients were randomly assigned. After 67 events, stratified analysis revealed that median progression-free survival was significantly shorter for apitolisib than for everolimus (3.7 v 6.1 months; hazard ratio, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.23 to 3.63; P < .01]); apitolisib was not favored in any stratification subgroup. Median overall survival was not significantly different but trended in favor of everolimus (16.5 v 22.8 months; hazard ratio, 1.77 [95% CI, 0.97 to 3.24; P = .06]). The objective response rate was 7.1% for apitolisib and 11.6% for everolimus. Patients administered apitolisib with a greater incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events were more likely to discontinue treatment (31% v 12% for everolimus). No drug-related deaths were observed. Apitolisib in comparison with everolimus was associated with substantially more high-grade hyperglycemia (40% v 9%) and rash (24% v 2%). Apitolisib pharmacokinetics suggested a relationship between exposure, and rash and hyperglycemia. Retrospective biomarker analyses revealed a relationship between VHL mutation status and outcome with everolimus but not with apitolisib. High hypoxia-inducible factor 1α protein expression was associated with better outcome in both arms. Conclusion This study demonstrated that dual PI3K/mTOR inhibition by apitolisib was less effective than was everolimus in mRCC, likely because full blockade of PI3K/mTOR signaling resulted in multiple on-target adverse events. VHL mutation and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression may be predictive of an mTOR inhibitor benefit, although prospective validation is required.

Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine Combination Chemotherapy in Taxane-Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study of the Kinki Multidisciplinary Breast Oncology Group (KMBOG) 1015

Chemotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 307-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Yamamura ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
Daigo Yamamoto ◽  
Shigeru Tsuyuki ◽  
Masahide Yamaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival

Background: This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the chemotherapy combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in taxane-pretreated Japanese metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: In this multicenter, phase II, single-arm study, patients with recurrent or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer were administered gemcitabine (1,200 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate, and other endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled in this study. The objective response rate and clinical benefit rate were 24 and 43%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months. The median overall survival was 11.1 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was the most common hematologic toxicity, occurring in 22 patients (54%). Nonhematologic toxicity was moderate and transient, with fatigue (48%) being the most common condition and no severe adverse event reported. Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is an effective and tolerable regimen for HER2-negative, taxane-pretreated, metastatic breast cancer patients in Japan.

Randomized Phase II Study of Erlotinib Combined With Bevacizumab Compared With Bevacizumab Alone in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (29) ◽  
pp. 4536-4541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald M. Bukowski ◽  
Fairooz F. Kabbinavar ◽  
Robert A. Figlin ◽  
Keith Flaherty ◽  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Additional Clinical Benefit ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

PurposeBevacizumab (Bev) has clinical activity in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and, when combined with erlotinib (Erl), has shown encouraging objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). We performed a phase II, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial to assess whether Erl provides additional clinical benefit with regard to PFS and ORR when combined with Bev in first-line treatment of metastatic RCC.Patients and MethodsOne hundred four patients received intravenous Bev (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks in combination with oral Erl (150 mg) or placebo daily. Patients were treated until progression or toxicity.ResultsA landmark analysis was performed 9 months after enrollment was completed (median follow-up, 9.8 months). Sixty-five patients had discontinued therapy; time to study discontinuation did not differ between the two treatment groups. The median PFS was 9.9 months (Bev + Erl [B+E]) versus 8.5 months (Bev; hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.49; P = .58). ORR (complete plus partial) was 14% (B+E) versus 13% (Bev). One complete response occurred in the B+E group. Median survival was 20 months for B+E but not reached for Bev. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (> 5% of patients) were hypertension, rash, proteinuria, diarrhea, and hemorrhage. One treatment-related death occurred on study (GI perforation, B+E group).ConclusionThe addition of Erl to Bev was well tolerated, but did not provide additional clinical benefit compared with Bev alone. Bev has encouraging clinical activity for previously untreated metastatic RCC patients.

Trebananib (AMG 386) in Combination With Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase II Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (30) ◽  
pp. 3431-3438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Gwenaelle Gravis ◽  
Kazimierz Drosik ◽  
Tomasz Demkow ◽  
Piotr Tomczak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Trebananib, an investigational recombinant peptide-Fc fusion protein, neutralizes the receptor-ligand interaction between Tie2 and angiopoietin-1/2. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate trebananib plus sunitinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Patients and Methods Adults with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were enrolled sequentially onto two cohorts that received sunitinib 50 mg once per day for 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off and intravenous trebananib once per week at a dose of 10 mg/kg in cohort A or 15 mg/kg in cohort B. The primary end points were incidences of adverse events (AEs) and dose interruptions of sunitinib during the first 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included objective response rate and progression-free survival. Results Eighty-five patients were enrolled: 43 in cohort A, and 42 in cohort B. During the first 12 weeks of treatment, 58% and 57% of patients in cohorts A and B, respectively, had sunitinib dose interruptions (dose decrease, withholding, or withdrawal). The most frequent AEs were diarrhea (cohort A, 74%; cohort B, 67%), mucosal inflammation (cohort A, 49%; cohort B, 60%), and hypertension (cohort A, 52%; cohort B, 45%). AEs of grade 3 or greater occurred in 58% of patients in cohort A and in 69% of patients in cohort B. The objective response rate was 58% and 63% in cohorts A and B, respectively. The median progression-free survival time was 13.9 months (95% CI, 10.4 to 19.2) and 16.3 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 21.4) in cohorts A and B, respectively. The median overall survival time was 36 months (95% CI, 25.2 to not estimable) in cohort A and was not estimable (median follow-up, 25 months) in cohort B. Conclusion Trebananib plus sunitinib seemed to increase toxicity at the tested doses. Efficacy results suggest a potential benefit for the addition of trebananib to sunitinib.

Is there any prognostic importance of pretreatment serum M30 and serum M65 levels on progression-free survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line sunitinib?

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15569-e15569
Author(s):  
Mert Basaran ◽  
Ibrahim Yildiz ◽  
Fatma Sen ◽  
Leyla Kilic ◽  
Serkan Keskin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Cell Death ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Serum ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

e15569 Background: Effective cancer biomarkers for early detection, prognosis, or prediction of therapy response are urgently need in metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC). Soluble cytokeratin 18 fragments (M30, M65) are released from human cancer cells during epitelial cell death. Specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) using related antibodies distinguish between apoptotic (M30) or apoptotic and necrotic (M65) tumor cell death in serum samples. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of plasma M30 and M65 levels in predicting survival rates of patients with metastatic RCC treated with first-line sunitinib. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with metastatic RCC and 39 healthy controls were included in this study. The patients’ samples were collected prior to the first cycle of sunitinib therapy and serum M30 and M65 levels were measured by ELISA. Results: The median ages of the patients and controls were 60 and 58 years, respectively. No difference was detected in the median serum M30 level between the patients and controls (53.7 vs. 49.1 U/l, P = 0.31). The median serum M65 level was significantly higher in patients than in controls (334.0 vs. 179.1 U/l, P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the best cut-off value for serum M65 level for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) was 313.6 U/l. The median PFS of patients whose M65 levels were lower than or equal to 313.6 U/l was better than that of patients whose M65 levels were greater than 313.6 U/l (P = 0.03) in univariate analysis. But serum M65 levels in patient group were not found to be an important prognostic factor for PFS in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Serum M65 levels were significantly elevated in patients with metastatic RCC compared to healthy individuals. Future prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed to address the possible impact of M30 and M65 levels on the treatment responses of patients and whether these markers may be prognostic factors for PFS or OS in patients with RCC.

scholarly journals Interleukin-2 in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic renal cell cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastien Hotte ◽  
Tricia Waldron ◽  
Christina Canil ◽  
Eric Winquist
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Free Survival

Objective: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy of interleukin-2 (IL-2) for the treatment of patientswith unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Methods: We searched the literature to identify RCTs or meta-analyses of RCTscomparing treatment regimens with IL-2 to those without. Outcomes of interestincluded overall or progression-free survival, response rate, toxicity andquality of life.Results: We identified 36 RCTs, and 6 met the eligibility criteria (1098 patients).We studied IL-2 alone and in combination with other agents, including interferon-alpha (IFN-a), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and 13-cis-retinoic acid or tamoxifen.No trials comparing high-dose IL-2 to non-IL-2 regimens were identified.A meta-analysis of 1-year mortality data from the 6 trials did not show a differencebetween IL-2-based regimens and non-IL-2 controls. Two of the 6trials detected statistically significant longer survival with IL-2 combinedwith IFN-a and 5-FU. Of the 4 trials that assessed progression-free survival, 3 reported significantly longer progression-free intervals with IL-2-based regimens.Five trials reported response rates; pooling the rates from these trialsgave an overall weighted response rate of 13.3% (range 9%–39%) and 5.3%(range 0%–20%) for IL-2-containing regimens and non-IL-2 regimens, respectively.IL-2-based regimens were more toxic than were non-IL-2 controls;the most frequently reported grade 3–4 toxicities were hypotension (range6%–68%), fever (2%–56%), nausea or vomiting or both (6%–34%), diarrhea(1%–28%) and cardiac toxicity (11%–25%). None of the trials reported healthrelatedquality-of-life data.Conclusion: Non-high-dose IL-2 containing regimens do not provide superiortreatment efficacy over non-IL-2-based regimens, with added toxicity, and thereforeshould not be used as standard treatment for patients with unresectableor metastatic RCC. High-dose IL-2 should only be used by experienced physiciansin the context of a clinical trial or investigative setting.

Modest efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidekazu Tachibana ◽  
Tsunenori Kondo ◽  
Hiroki Ishihara ◽  
Hironori Fukuda ◽  
Kazuhiko Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Purpose Combined immunotherapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma showed prolonged progression-free survival and high objective response rate in a randomized phase III clinical trial. However, the efficacy of this treatment for papillary renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. In the present study, we analysed the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy for papillary renal cell carcinoma compared with that for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study of 30 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received nivolumab and ipilimumab as first-line therapy between December 2015 and May 2020. The objective response rate, progression-free survival and toxicity were compared between the two groups (clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma). Results Out of 30 patients, 7 and 23 were diagnosed with papillary renal cell carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma, respectively. With a median follow-up of 7.2 months, the median progression-free survival was significantly shorter in papillary renal cell carcinoma than in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (2.4 vs. 28.1 months, P = 0.014). Of the seven patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma, one had partial response, one had stable disease and five had progressive disease, resulting in an objective response rate of 14.2%, which was lower compared to that of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (14.2 vs. 52.1%, P = 0.06). Discontinuation due to toxicity was not observed with papillary renal cell carcinoma, meanwhile 60.8% of patient with clear cell renal cell carcinoma discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Conclusion Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had modest efficacy for papillary renal cell carcinoma compared with that for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab remains an option for a limited number of patients with intermediate- or poor-risk papillary renal cell carcinoma.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Brain Metastases From Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN Multicenter Phase II Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (23) ◽  
pp. 2008-2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronan Flippot ◽  
Cécile Dalban ◽  
Brigitte Laguerre ◽  
Delphine Borchiellini ◽  
Gwénaelle Gravis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE Nivolumab is standard of care for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) after failure of antiangiogenic therapies, but its activity on brain metastases from ccRCC remains unknown, because these patients were excluded from pivotal studies. We aimed to assess the activity of nivolumab in this population. METHODS The GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN phase II trial assessed the activity and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic ccRCC who failed vascular endothelial growth factor–directed therapies ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03013335 ). Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases were prospectively identified and underwent dedicated brain evaluation. Two cohorts were constituted: cohort A comprised patients with previously untreated brain metastases, and cohort B comprised patients whose brain metastases underwent prior therapy. The primary end point was intracranial response rate in cohort A. RESULTS Seventy-three patients with brain metastases were included: 39 in cohort A and 34 in cohort B. Intracranial response rate was 12% in cohort A; no objective response was reported in patients with brain lesions that were multiple or larger than 1 cm. Median intracranial progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.3 to 4.6 months) in cohort A and 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 8.0 months) in cohort B, with adjusted hazard ratio of 2.04 (95% CI, 1.08 to 3.83). Overall survival rate at 12 months was 67% (95% CI, 49.6% to 79.1%) in cohort A and 59% (95% CI, 40.6% to 73.2%) in cohort B. Most patients in cohort A (72%) needed subsequent focal brain therapy. Nivolumab was well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicity. CONCLUSION Nivolumab activity is limited in patients with untreated brain metastases from ccRCC. Brain imaging and focal therapy should be considered before immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic ccRCC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document