BECAM: A salvage protocol with bevacizumab, capecitabin, and mitomycin C for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) or gastric cancer (GC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13554-13554 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Peinert ◽  
D. Arnold ◽  
R. Siewczynski ◽  
T. Kegel ◽  
C. Heider ◽  
...  

13554 Background: Bevacizumab (Bev), a monoclonal antibody targeted against VEGF, has shown to improve efficacy in CRC when combined with chemotherapy. Combination schedules of fluoropyrimidines with mitomycin C (MMC) are active in both CRC and GC. This study was to explore the combination of Bev with a previously reported schedule of Capecitabine (Cap) and MMC (BECAM) in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with GC or CRC. Methods: Pts had to be refractory to at least 3 treatment lines, incl. 5-FU, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and cetuximab in CRC; 2 lines with 5-FU, platinum, irinotecan or taxane in GC. A treatment cycle consisted of a 1-hour-infusion of Bev 7.5 mg/kg d1, bolus MMC 7mg/m2 d1 and Cap 1000mg/m2 bid d1–14, all qd22. Toxicity was assessed every 3 weeks (wk) and tumor evaluation (CT/MRI) was done every 9 wk. Results: 19 pts were included: m/f 8/11; GC 4, CRC 15, age 63 yrs [42–76], Karnofsky PS 80% [70–100]. Median no. of preceding regimens was 3 [2–6]. A total of 87 cycles were given. Median no. of cycles per pt. was 3 [2–15]. 18 pts were evaluable for toxicity (WHO scale) and efficacy: Grade 3/4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (5/0), hypertension (1/0), and hemorrhage (0/1). The latter caused cessation of further administration of Bev. Gastrointestinal and other hematologic toxicities did not exceed grade 2. Response: PR was seen in 3 pts (16%; 1/4 GC, 2/14 CRC), stable disease for > 9 wk in 5 pts (1 GC, 4 CRC), leading to a tumor control rate of 44%. Median progression free and overall survival were 3.0 [2–11] and 5.0 [2.5–13] months. However, duration of objective response was remarkable in lasting 7.4–10.0 months. Conclusions: BECAM shows considerable activity in this group of heavily pretreated pts with CRC or GC. Toxicity was generally mild except for MMC-induced thrombocytopenia and (probably) Bev-induced bleeding (gastric tumor site). Despite previous reports of limited activity with Bev/5-FU in refractory pts (NCI TRC trial), BECAM is able to induce long lasting objective responses and therefore merits further investigation in both tumor types. [Table: see text]

Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Moon Ki Choi ◽  
Yongjun Cha ◽  
Ji Yeon Baek

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Due to few efficacious options in later lines of therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there has been considerable interest in the possibility of retreatment with previously administered agents. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan retreatment (IRI2) in patients with refractory mCRC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with mCRC who were retreated with irinotecan-based regimens. The retreatment regimens with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies were excluded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 64 patients were included. Patients had a median age of 56 years and were offered mainly in the setting of third- or fourth-line therapy with IRI2. The disease control rate was 78.2% including an objective response of 23.5%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 and 19.3 months, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or higher toxicities were nausea/vomiting (27.9%) and neutropenia (25%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> IRI2 might be a reasonable option for heavily pretreated patients with mCRC who achieved disease control with prior irinotecan therapy.


1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Rougier ◽  
R Bugat ◽  
J Y Douillard ◽  
S Culine ◽  
E Suc ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14555-14555
Author(s):  
P. Zoran ◽  
D. Tarabar ◽  
R. Doder

14555 Background: This is a phase II study combination of capecitabine plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of both irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-containing regimens. Methods: The dose of capecitabine was 1000 mg/m2, administered twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks. Bevacizumab was given at a dose of 5mg/kg on day 1 as i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. Treatment was repeated until the occurrence of disease progression or unaccepted toxicity. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Of 28 patients, the overall response rate was 14.3% and the disease control rate was 42.9%. With a median follow-up period of 7 months, median time to progression and overall survival duration were 3 months and 14 months, respectively. The 1-year survival rate of all patients was 60.7%. The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included leukopenia/neutropenia in 4 patients and thrombocytopenia in 3 patients. Nonhematologic toxicities attributable to bevacizumab included bleeding in 3 patients, hypertension in 4 patients, thromboses in 3 patients, proteinuria in 5 patients, and gastrointestinal perforation in 1 patient. Conclusions: This drug regimen was well tolerated and combination of bevacizumab and capecitabine shows potential as third line chemotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2539-2539
Author(s):  
N. Isambert ◽  
G. Spitaleri ◽  
P. Fumoleau ◽  
C. Noberasco ◽  
C. Ramazeilles ◽  
...  

2539 Background: SSR244738 is a new cytotoxic agent (G2-cell cycle inhibitor). In this first in man study the original schedule of administration was an IV infusion once every 3 weeks (Q3W); and due to the high clearance variability, 1300 mg/m2 was considered the maximum administered dose (MAD). The study was amended to test the twice weekly schedule (D1-D4-D8-D11-D15, every 3 weeks). Methods: Standard escalation was used in cohorts of 3–6 pts. PK profiles (up to T48h or T96h) were obtained in each pt after the 1st and the 5th administration (D1 and D15) of Cycle 1. In the Q3W, there was a trend to lower clearance (CL) in CYP2C9 *3/*3 and *1/*3 genotype pts therefore genotype samples were analyzed at baseline to identify poor metabolizers (PM) and adjust-dosing accordingly. Results: 22 heavily pretreated patients received SSR244738 at doses of 200 (3 pts), 280 (4 pts), 400 (3 pts), 560 (3 pts), 780 (3 pt), 1000 (6 pts; one pt was a PM and received 500 mg/m2). 15 females, 7 males, median age: 60 years (29–82), ECOG: (0:12, 1:9, Unk:1). Main tumor types: ovary, lung, breast, colon and prostate. Nb cycles/pts: > 2 cycles/21 (95%), > 4 cycles/9 (41%), > 6 cycles/6 (27%), > 8 cycles/2 (9%). The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression. DLT was seen in 2 pts at 1000 mg/m2 dose level: one patient had febrile neutropenia associated with Grade 3 mucositis and the second patient had Grade 3 neutropenia, which caused a treatment delay. Both pts showed high SSR244738 plasma exposures on D15. SD was reported in 11 patients. No CRs or PRs were observed. SSR244738 exhibited an overall low plasma CL (mean [range]: 0.9 [0.3–2.1] L/h). CL slightly decreased with repeated administration. The distribution volume was low [Vss mean (CV%): 11.6 L (30%)] and the terminal half life was long [mean (CV%): 15.6 h (58%)]. No deviation from dose proportionality could be observed, despite the moderate-to-high inter-individual variability (CV<64%) in exposure. Conclusions: SSR244738 is well tolerated with PK profile similar to the Q3W schedule; by changing the schedule of administration we were able to reach the MAD dose (5000 mg/m2/cycle). [Table: see text]


2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1759-1766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus M. Borner ◽  
Daniel Dietrich ◽  
Roger Stupp ◽  
Rudolf Morant ◽  
Hanspeter Honegger ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced nonpretreated and pretreated colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three nonpretreated patients and 26 patients who had experienced one fluoropyrimidine-containing regimen for advanced colorectal cancer were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 bid on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks. Patients with good performance status (World Health Organization grade 0 to 1) were accrued onto two nonrandomized parallel arms of a phase II study. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 65%) for nonpretreated and 15% (95% CI, 4% to 35%) for pretreated patients. The main toxicity of this combination was diarrhea, which occurred at grade 3 or 4 in 35% of the nonpretreated and 50% of the pretreated patients. Grade 3 or 4 sensory neuropathy, including laryngopharyngeal dysesthesia, occurred in 16% of patients on both cohorts. Capecitabine dose reductions were necessary in 26% of the nonpretreated and 45% of the pretreated patients in the second treatment cycle. The median overall survival was 17.1 months and 11.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combining capecitabine and oxaliplatin yields promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The main toxicity is diarrhea, which is manageable with appropriate dose reductions. On the basis of our toxicity experience, we recommend use of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 at an initial dose of 1,250 mg/m2 bid in nonpretreated patients and at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 bid in pretreated patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15584-e15584
Author(s):  
Kseniya Yakimovich ◽  
Mariya Alaniya ◽  
Polina Shilo ◽  
Anastasia Mochalova ◽  
Evgeny Ledin

e15584 Background: Options of therapy are limited for patients with colorectal cancer who developed disease progression during standard 5-FU-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-contained regimens. There is straight information about synergy of irinotecan (SN-38) and oxaliplatin gained from fundamental and early clinical trials. We aimed to analyze effectiveness and safety of triple drug-combination of 5-FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients with a metastatic colorectal cancer who received more than 2 lines of standard 5-FU-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based doublet regimens with or without targeted therapy were included. Reinduction of chemotherapy in previous lines was allowed. The retrospective analysis of medical histories was done. Eligible patients had to receive number of cycles that were sufficient for response rate estimation. Disease response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Tolerability was estimated by CTCAE v. 5.0. Results: Forty-six patients were included in retrospective per protocol analysis. The median follow-up was 19 months. The median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 2 (2-6). Primary resistance to oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemo during previous lines was noted in 20 patients (43%) and 16 patients (35%), respectively, while seven patients (15%) developed the primary resistance to both agents given in a sequential order. All patients were treated with targeted therapy during previous treatment lines. The median of FOLFOXIRI cycles was 8 (range, 2-19). Two patients (4%) were treated with FOLFOXIRI without any targeted agents. The objective response rate was 33% (n = 15). The disease stabilization was reached in 43% (n = 20). The disease control rate was 76% (n = 35). Eleven patients (24%) had the progression of disease at the first follow-up. The median progression free survival and median overall survival were 6 months and 11 months, respectively. Toxicity was evaluated in 35 patients. The most common severe adverse events (grade 3 and 4) were neutropenia (46%) and fatigue (26%). Treatment was delayed in 20 patients (57%), and 13 patients (37%) required dose reduction. One patient had to discontinue treatment due to unacceptable toxicity. Conclusions: According to our study FOLFOXIRI provides the objective response and increased life expectancy in heavily pretreated patients. The further assessment of FOLFOXIRI regimen for refractory colorectal cancer in the prospective trials is needed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (23) ◽  
pp. 5314-5322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Chan ◽  
Max E. Scheulen ◽  
Stephen Johnston ◽  
Klaus Mross ◽  
Fatima Cardoso ◽  
...  

Purpose In this study, two doses of temsirolimus (CCI-779), a novel inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, were evaluated for efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had been heavily pretreated. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 109) were randomly assigned to receive 75 or 250 mg of temsirolimus weekly as a 30-minute intravenous infusion. Patients were evaluated for tumor response, time to tumor progression, adverse events, and pharmacokinetics of temsirolimus. Results Temsirolimus produced an objective response rate of 9.2% (10 partial responses) in the intent-to-treat population. Median time to tumor progression was 12.0 weeks. Efficacy was similar for both dose levels but toxicity was more common with the higher dose level, especially grade 3 or 4 depression (10% of patients at the 250-mg dose level, 0% at the 75-mg dose level). The most common temsirolimus-related adverse events of all grades were mucositis (70%), maculopapular rash (51%), and nausea (43%). The most common, clinically important grade 3 or 4 adverse events were mucositis (9%), leukopenia (7%), hyperglycemia (7%), somnolence (6%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and depression (5%). Conclusion In heavily pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, 75 and 250 mg temsirolimus showed antitumor activity and 75 mg temsirolimus showed a generally tolerable safety profile.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Ginevra Lolli ◽  
Beatrice Casadei ◽  
Lisa Argnani ◽  
Alessandro Pileri ◽  
Cinzia Pellegrini ◽  
...  

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a disease almost impossible to cure. In the context of heavily pretreated patients, the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) pembrolizumab is a valid therapeutic option. The alteration of the PD-1-PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis is often present in MF, and this aspect explains the feasibility of this therapy. We report the case of a 60-year-old woman diagnosed with MF in 2003, Olsen stage IA (T1M0NXBO). Since the moment of the diagnosis, she received 10 lines of therapy, with a short duration of response after each one of them. In April 2020, our patient started pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, and she achieved a partial response after the 4th cycle, consistent with the modified severity assessment tool (mSWAT) 1, which she is still maintaining after 10 cycles. No grade ≥3 adverse events were recorded. We conclude that pembrolizumab can induce extremely rapid responses in MF, with very low toxicity.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Claudio Cerchione ◽  
Lucio Catalano ◽  
Davide Nappi ◽  
Anna Emanuele Pareto ◽  
Gerardo Musuraca ◽  
...  

Background Pomalidomide is a new generation IMID, with a very good compliance, thanks to oral administration, which can be used also in heavily pretreated patients, in a domestic setting. Aims In this retrospective observational trial, It has been evaluated efficacy and tolerance of pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (PD) as salvage regimen in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory MM (rrMM), whose prognosis is particularly severe. Methods 57 patients (31 M/26 F), with rrMM, median age at diagnosis 69 years (r. 52-86), and median age at start of treatment 76 years (r.56-90) treated with several lines of treatments (median 7, r. 2-11), every refractory to all the drugs previously received (also Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Lenalidomide), received Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone (Pomalidomide 4 mg for 21 days, Dexamethasone 40 mg days 1,8,15,22, pegfilgrastim day +8) every 28 days, until progression. ISS was equally distributed, and cytogenetic at relapse was evaluable in 14 patients. All the patients had previously been treated with schedule containing bortezomib and IMIDs. 63% (36/57) had undergone at least to a single ASCT. All patients were relapsed and refractory to last therapies received before PD. Results Pomalidomide was well tolerated, with grade 3-4 transfusion-dependent anemia in 58% (33/57) of patients, 44% (23/57) grade 3-4 neutropenia (pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis was given, no hospitalization was required, no septic shocks were observed), 40% (23/57) grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia without hemorrhagic events and transfusion-dependence. No severe extra-hematologic toxicity was observed. According to IMWG, ORR1 (≥PR) was 47.3% (27/57: 5 CR, 11 VGPR, 7 PR, 4 MR), but, considering that we are evaluating a cohort of heavily pretreated patients, with poor prognosis, another parameter should be considered, ORR2 (≥SD), considering stable disease as a successful result in progressive MM. ORR2 was 77.1% (17 SD). These can be considered as impressive result in this subset of patients. Oral treatment gives a really good compliance, in frail and unfit patients, and response, when present, is always really fast (median time to response: 2 months (r.1-6)), median OS from diagnosis was 94 months (range 21-234), median OS from start of pomalidomide was 9 months (range 1-25). Nine patients have surprisingly achieved a notable response (3 VGPR, 4 PR, 2 MR) after failure of novel agents (i.e. Carfilzomib, Daratumumab and Pomalidomide). Conclusions Pomalidomide-dexamethasone has shown significant efficacy and a very good compliance, thanks to oral administration, in a particularly severe setting of heavily pretreated patients, relapsed and refractory to all available therapeutic resources, also after failure of novel agents. Disclosures Lucchesi: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document